Experts: Producer responsibility needed, but hard to manage

Mike Verespej

Published: September 13, 2012 6:00 am ET

Related to this story

Topics Consumer Products, Sustainability, Recycling

AUSTIN, TEXAS (Sept. 13, 3:50 p.m. ET) — As more companies and brand owners debate the pros and cons of extended producer responsibility, several individuals currently involved in mandated product take-back programs caution that putting together the right system is a daunting task that gets further complicated when government mandates vary from state-to-state.

They also note that there are not many precedents for how companies can work together — which breeds caution and conservation. In addition, collection can be fragmented, preventing programs from getting the volumes needed to successful.

In addition to different mandates, “the biggest challenges are collection and influencing consumer behavior,” said Walter Alcorn, vice president of environmental affairs and industry sustainability for the Consumer Electronics Association, at the recent Resource Recycling Conference in Austin.

Carl Smith, CEO and president of Call2Recycle — a non-profit organization funded by Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corp. members to advance recycling — agreed.

“Recycling of items needs to be in an environment that pushes things forward,” said Smith, whose organization now recycles both batteries and cell phones. “That is difficult because often it is so fragmented that there is not enough critical mass for recycling to be efficient.”

“In most voluntary systems, the brand owner should be active in taking the product back and playing an important role in financing, but that doesn’t always happen,” he said.

The other collection challenge is engaging and incenting consumers to recycle products, they said.

“Products are widely distributed, but consumers own them until they dispose of them, and collection ultimately depends on consumer behavior and often there is no direct incentive for consumer,” Alcorn said.

“Recycling is good for a lot of reasons, but there is no direct incentive for consumers,” he said. “We need recycling programs convenient to the public. Our long-term goal is to make recycling as easy as a purchase.”

In addition, Smith said Call2Recycle believes — based on its nearly 20 years of experience — that “voluntary collection eventually maxes out at a certain number, unless there is a huge end value in the market for what you are collecting.”

“Without putting more of backbone to it, you don’t get huge collection numbers,” he said

That’s why both Call2Recycle are both seeking nationwide product stewardship solutions to help their organizations spur more recycling — and to bring uniformity to take-back programs that have different rules in different states.

A case in point: e-waste, where 25 states now have mandated take-back program, many of which are similar in natural — but still different.

“The differences in state laws present long-term difficulties and challenges,” said Alcorn. “We are now working [as an industry] toward a national solution to get the scale of collection to where we can get efficiencies. A national problem should have a national solution. All parties must be held to the industry standards.”

That was one of the factors that triggered CEA and a dozen leading consumer electronics companies to launch a nationwide eCycling leadership initiative 18 months ago with the aim of recycling 1 billion pounds of consumer electronics goods by 2016.

“We are doing it to keep state 26 from happening,” admitted Alcorn, “We are trying to reduce the need for legislation. You could almost say that we were almost a failure because it took us [the industry] this long” to put together a national program.

“The eCycling leadership initiative provides an operational model for an industry-led national system and the opportunity for us to learn what works and what doesn’t as we go forward,” Alcorn said. “It really marks the shift in our industry from talking about a national solution to setting goals and expectations that will help make that happen.”

Similarly, Call2Recycle — whose predecessor organization was originally formed to prevent more states from adopting mandated battery recycling — now advocates “a nationwide product stewardship” approach in order to get companies that do not join in industry-wide recycling initiatives — to participate, Smith said.

“We were collecting more and more, but less and less that had a revenue stream,” Smith said. “Up to 40 percent of what we were collecting did not have a revenue stream.”

Since 1996, Call2Recycle has diverted over 70 million pounds of rechargeable batteries and established a network of 30,000 public collection sites to collect rechargeable batteries and cell phones. In 2011, it collected a record 7.6 million pounds of rechargeable batteries in the U.S. and Canada, and 1.3 million pounds of non-rechargeable batteries in Canada.

Similarly, in 2011, CEA — which estimates that there are more than 7,500 permanent drop-off locations for consumer electronics in the United States — said that manufacturers and retailers recycled 460 million pounds of electronics up 53 percent from 2010 with 96 percent of that done through certified third-party recycling facilities.

Also giving electronics recycling a boost was Best Buy’s decision nine months ago to eliminate the fees it had been charging consumers for dropping off items for recycling.

Both groups agree that for recycling to succeed that national programs are needed, and that recycling needs to be viewed “as a component of a company’s business model,” Alcorn said.

‘What I’d like to see is an industry-driven system for recycling consumer electronics where companies make it part of their business model,” said Alcorn. “If you can get companies to integrate recycling into their business model, it will happen nationally.”

Eventually, Alcorn said he’d like “to see five or six product stewardship organizations that collect a variety of products—not material or product-specific programs.”

Smith agreed.

“We have to look at ways to work across product streams,” said Smith. “As we expand product-specific recycling, we also need to put time into thinking about this to develop collection and recycling properly so that is not all splintered, and so we are doing it efficiently, not inefficiently.”

Garth Hickle, product stewardship leader with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, concurred.

“There is an increasing demand from the public for more recycling of products, and major brand owners are stepping forward and managing products at the end of their life,” he said. “We are starting to see kernels of multi-material approaches. The idea is starting to gain traction.”

“We need to research to determine what contributes to a well-funded voluntary stewardship program and how to make these programs efficient because we need to get a revenue stream associated with it,” said Hickle. “The fundamental stumbling block has been getting brand owners to work together and their concern whether benefits will accrue to them” or to their competitors.


Experts: Producer responsibility needed, but hard to manage

Mike Verespej

Published: September 13, 2012 6:00 am ET

Post Your Comments

Back to story

More stories


Unilever puts Dove brand on a MuCell diet

April 23, 2014 1:57 pm ET

New technology employed by Unilever NV in the manufacture of bottles for its Dove Body Wash range of products could end up saving the brand owner up...    More


Coffee roaster looks to improve footprint of single cup systems

April 22, 2014 1:30 pm ET

One of the largest coffee and tea manufacturers in North America has introduced a single-serve beverage capsule intended to curb the waste created by ...    More

Two Eastman buildings among 10 biggest energy savers in national contest

April 22, 2014 11:35 am ET

Two offices at the headquarters of Eastman Chemical Co. in Kingsport, Tenn., ranked in the Top 10 for energy efficiency in the latest Energy Star...    More

Europe's bag use still expected to climb despite possible bag restrictions

April 22, 2014 9:29 am ET

Ceresana, a Germany-based research company, has released a report forecasting that by 2020 the sales volume of bags and sacks in Europe will reach 9....    More

DuPont: Asia's food packaging market at a major transition point

April 21, 2014 1:26 pm ET

DuPont Co. touted its packaging innovations and applications, and updated the firm's commercial status at a media event two days before the Chinaplas ...    More

Market Reports

Market Data Book - Rankings & Lists

A one-stop download of Plastic News' exclusive annual lists and processor rankings containing essential data including sales, employees, end markets, materials and more.
EXCLUSIVE EXCEL FEATURE: full mailing address details for available plant locations.

Learn more

Thermoformed Packaging 2014 Market Review & Outlook North America

This in-depth report provides analysis and discussions of economic and political conditions, market trends, legislative/regulatory activity impacting supply and demand, business opportunities and threats, materials pricing, manufacturing technology, as well as strategies being implemented by thermoformed packaging companies. In addition, there are reviews of 25 leading thermoformers in the packaging segment, assessing their growth initiatives and performance metrics over 10 years.

Learn more

Mold Making and Tooling Review and Outlook 2014 North America

This report provides in-depth analysis of the mold and toolmaking market for North America, including discussions of trends, opportunities, threats, the latest developments in production and labor and equipment trends impacting moldmakers.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

May 6, 2014 - May 8, 2014Plastics in Medical Devices 2014

May 12, 2014 - May 12, 2014Plastics News Brazil Pharma Summit

September 10, 2014 - September 12, 2014Plastics Caps & Closures 2014

February 3, 2015 - February 7, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

More Events