Report offers alternatives to extended producer responsibility

Published: September 14, 2012 6:00 am ET

Related to this story

Topics Sustainability, Packaging

PITTSBURGH (Sept. 14, 1:25 p.m. ET) — A cost analysis done for the Grocery Manufacturers Association argues that alternatives to extended producer responsibility policies can achieve high municipal solid waste recycling rates at reasonable costs and address a wider spectrum of the waste stream.

The report, released at the Sustainable Forum in Pittsburgh on Sept. 12, also claims that mandatory EPR programs aimed at food, beverage and consumer product packaging would not deliver on their promise of creating more cost-effective residential recycling programs and driving packaging redesign.

The report analyzed recycling rates, system costs, packaging changes, and other data from various European and Canadian jurisdictions that employ EPR for packaging. In the U.S., it looked at nationwide recycling rates and recycling programs in Ramsey County, Minn.

Among the study’s principal findings:

• Packaging use has declined in the United States, where there is no packaging EPR, but it has increased slowly in Europe, where there is widespread packaging EPR.

“There is no indication that EPR has reduced packaging use economy-wide or had any effect on package design or selection,” said the 68-page report, prepared for GMA by SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC.

• Price signals sent by EPR to manufacturers are very weak in most jurisdictions compared to the overall value of the products they contain and price of packaging.

“Packaging EPR generally does not change the relative package cost among different package alternatives for a product,” said the report. “There is insufficient EPR fee differentiation to cause consumer packaged goods companies to switch from one package format to another.

The study also said that the U.S. has a higher recycling rate for municipal solid waste than both the European Union, 23 percent, and Canada, 18 percent, where EPR is widely employed.

It also noted that Ramsey County, a non-EPR jurisdiction in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, has a lower net cost per ton ($156) than EPR programs in the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Ontario, where costs are $166/ton and $202/ton, respectively. However, the report did not look at costs in any other specific municipalities in the U.S.

The report further argued that “states and municipalities already have at their disposal a suite of non-EPR policies that are both effective and efficient in terms of raising recycling rates.”

Specifically, the report cited more than a dozen approaches including disposal limits, recycling rewards or rebates for consumers, penalties, pay-as-you-throw disposal pricing, disposal bans, mandatory recycling of certain materials, diversion goals, landfill surcharges or taxes, advanced recycling/disposal fees, mandatory retail take-back programs, and building design standards.

“Together, [these initiatives] can achieve high recycling rates, without excess cost or administrative burden that results from EPR,” the report said.

“The most successful recycling and waste recovery programs will result from comprehensive approaches that leverage industry innovation and collaborative partnerships between NGO’s, government and industry, not one-size-fits-all mandates,” asserted Meghan Stasz, senior director of sustainability at GMA.


Comments

Report offers alternatives to extended producer responsibility

Published: September 14, 2012 6:00 am ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Pactiv expanding in North Carolina

March 5, 2015 4:18 pm ET

Pactiv LLC is spending more than $24 million on an expansion project in North Carolina that will create 59 new jobs.    More

Image

LiquiForm looks to fundamentally change blow molding process for bottles

March 5, 2015 12:13 pm ET

Those in the know are lifting the veil, just a bit, on fledgling technology being developed that would fundamentally change the way plastic bottles...    More

Image

VisiPak adds to customer mix, product offerings with Tulox acquisition

March 5, 2015 2:19 pm ET

VisiPak has acquired Tulox Plastics Corp., a maker of clear plastic packaging.    More

Image

Bigger doors, windows gain appeal

March 5, 2015 11:43 am ET

Door and window manufacturers are continuing to super-size product lines to make a grander first impression at main entrances and to expand vista...    More

Image

PET makes it possible to have your beer and be sustainable too

March 5, 2015 10:45 am ET

PET could replace stainless steel beer kegs in a material swap product developers say will be more environmentally friendly and cost effective for the...    More

Market Reports

Flexible Packaging Trends in North America

North America represents about 30 percent of the global consumption of flexible packaging. Annual growth in this region is forecast at 4 percent during the next 5 years.

For more insight on growth opportunities, drivers of growth and the outlook for 2015, download this report.

Learn more

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Plastics in Mexico - State of the Industry Report

This report analyzes the $20 billion plastics industry in Mexico including sales of machinery & equipment, resins and finished products.

Our analysts provide insight on business trends, foreign investment, top end markets and plastics processing activity. The report also provides important data on exports, production, employment and value of plastics products manufactured.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 16, 2015 - September 18, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

More Events