Is earning ISO worth money?

Daryl Guberman

Published: September 28, 2012 6:00 am ET

For over 30 years I’ve been involved in manufacturing and quality, starting at Sikorsky Aircraft and weaving through myriad industries — plastics, medical implants, industrial materials and printing. Indeed, I can remember the time when it was a significant achievement and honor for a company to acquire ISO certification/registration.

Unfortunately, it has since metamorphosed from an ethical standardizations process to a profit-driven system controlled by a monopoly supposedly overseeing all major registration companies.

In short, the fundamental principles of quality went from an esteemed achievement to one that can be bought. Is this quality? Or quality out of control?

The lack of added value continues to be the primary concern of quality managers seeking ISO certification. More companies are realizing it’s just not feasible to invest thousands of dollars to acquire and maintain a certificate. Moreover, the registrar will return 364 days later to perform another audit, which further increases the expense. Nevertheless, ISO can be a wise investment if the company gets value-added benefits proven to increase its bottom line, grow revenues and attract more customers.

I have personally experienced in my years in manufacturing what ISO has become. In fact, I have had auditors tell me one year, “Daryl you run a great system,” and the following year they come back for another surveillance audit and claim they need to issue a corrective action because it’s what the registration body expects.

No wonder companies are increasingly seeing ISO and the quality process as being distorted and financially driven, requiring an investment of a lot of money to gain acceptance and approval based on standardization procedures that are non-consistent. You end up with a standard that is not clear, which only devalues the confidence people have in the standards-setting process.

Since nearly all registrars are required to report to the same international accreditation body, the certification process as it stands today is flawed, and no better than the fox guarding the henhouse.

For this reason I founded G-PMC LLC as a stand-alone registrar reporting directly to the Industrial Leaders Group, which serves as its sole accrediting body. G-PMC is an independent entity of Guberman-PMC LLC, which provides consultation and technical assistance in achieving many ISO, AS and TS ratings, as well as Nadcap compliance and certification.

Daryl Guberman

Stratford, Conn.


Comments

Is earning ISO worth money?

Daryl Guberman

Published: September 28, 2012 6:00 am ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story

Market Reports

Plastics Caps & Closures Market Report

The annual recap of top trends and future outlook for the plastics caps & closures market features interviews with industry thought leaders and Bill Woods economic forecast of trends in growing end markets. You will also gain insight on trends in caps design, materials, machinery, molds & tooling and reviews of mergers & acquisitions.

Learn more

Shale Gas Market - Analysis of North American Region

This report highlights the impact of shale-based natural gas on the North American plastics market and features an in-depth analysis of production trends in the United States during 2013 and a forecast for 2014 and beyond.

Learn more

Thermoformed Packaging 2014 Market Review & Outlook North America

This in-depth report analyzes economic and market trends, legislative/regulatory activity impacting supply and demand, business opportunities and threats, materials pricing, manufacturing technology, as well as growth strategies being implemented by thermoformed packaging companies.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

January 14, 2015 - January 14, 2015Plastics in Automotive

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

More Events