If you just read the headline, "Expanded polystyrene ban in Brookline gets 'no' from Selectmen," you might think this is a story about a community where the plastics industry was victorious in the wave of product bans that seems to be sweeping across parts of the United States.
But take a closer look.
First, you've got a resident proposing a ban on polystyrene because it is "bad for the environment because it is not biodegradable and the federal government classified styrene, a chemical found in Styrofoam, as a possible carcinogen in 2011."
So only products that are degradable are good for the environment? And can we get some data on human exposure to styrene from "Styrofoam" cups?
So her reaction? Let's ban those, too.
The Brookline Board of Selectmen decided against that proposal, but not because they were well informed about the benefits of PS food service products and packaging.
One said: "When I drink a cup of coffee out of a standard foam polystyrene cup, I taste the Styrofoam," he said. "I suspect that when you have a heated beverage, that there is something unhealthful about it...I liked our first version where we were banning the extended foam version of polystyrene."
So Brookline is banning PS foam, but not solid PS products like lids and straws. Retailers and restaurants will have to adjust but that's no problem, according to the Selectmen -- there are plenty of biodegradable alternatives to PS.
And those are automatically better products, right?
No need to put any real research into this issue -- at least not in Brookline.