Related to this story
DETROIT (Dec. 17, 2:15 p.m. ET) — United Auto Workers President Bob King expects few defections by his members when Michigan’s right-to-work law takes effect in March.
Unionized workers at parts suppliers will be among the first to test King’s confidence. As supplier contracts with UAW expire and are renewed or negotiated after the law takes effect, employees will be able to leave the union.
Contracts with the Detroit 3 expire in September 2015, so the law will have no impact on those plants until then. There’s a provision in the law that prohibits the legislation from abrogating existing contracts.
King, who negotiated Detroit 3 contracts for about 115,000 auto workers last year, said the union is providing value to members, as evidenced by the fact that 90 percent of UAW-represented auto workers in right-to-work states have chosen to stay in the union. “We’re going to continue doing the best job we can and be rewarded with the loyalty of the membership,” King said. He spoke by phone from Geneva, where he was attending a meeting of global union federations.
UAW has about 151,000 members in Michigan at assembly and parts plants, public employers and other businesses. UAW would not disclose how many are in the auto industry.
The legislation is a threat to the lifeblood of a union still trying to organize nonunion automakers in the South.
For Detroit 3 auto workers, dues amount to two hours of wages per month, or about $600 per year.
Last week Michigan became the 24th state to enact so-called right-to-work legislation. Under right-to-work, employees cannot be required to join a union, stay in a union or pay union dues at companies at which unions have won the right to bargain collectively for workers.
King said UAW and other unions fought hard to prevent the legislation because right-to-work undermines wages and benefits and suppresses workplace democracy. Michigan Republican Governor Rick Snyder signed the legislation last week after it was fast-tracked through the Republican-dominated state legislature in a matter of days, with no committee hearings, during a lame-duck session.
King said the best way to keep members from leaving the union is to bargain hard for wages and benefits and continue to represent worker interests in health, safety and work rules. “That’s why there’s solidarity in the workplace,” King said.
In addition to representing about 115,000 Detroit 3 auto workers across the country, UAW represents tens of thousands of workers employed by parts suppliers. An exact number was not available from UAW.
But as supplier contracts expire sooner and workers can choose to leave the union, the true value proposition of UAW will be put to the test, said Neil De Koker, president of the Original Equipment Suppliers Association in suburban Detroit. The association represents about 430 parts suppliers, including most of the largest ones that do direct contracting and engineering with the carmakers, the so-called Tier 1 suppliers.
De Koker said right-to-work laws in many Southern states have proved a magnet to automakers and their suppliers desiring to operate without unions.
He said right-to-work in Michigan will make the unions more accountable for how they spend the dues of members because those members will be in a position to leave the union if they disagree with that spending.
He said UAW spends heavily on the political campaigns of mostly Democratic Party candidates despite a membership that includes many conservatives and Republicans.
In 2011, UAW collected about $122 million in dues passed through to the International, according to the union’s most recent regulatory filing.
“The unions are really going to have to focus on the priorities of their members,” De Koker said.
Adam Forman, a Detroit lawyer with Miller Canfield, said Michigan parts suppliers with union contracts that expire soon need to make preparations for right-to-work.
They will need to have a mechanism for turning off the collection of union dues for workers who leave the union, Forman said.
He said they also have to be careful about communicating the rights of workers under the new legislation so as not to conflict with regulatory prohibitions against swaying workers to belong or not belong to unions.