The Plastics Blog
By Don Loepp | About The Plastics Blog

Extreme and unreasonable: declaring plastic waste 'hazardous'

By Don Loepp | February 18, 2013 12:19 pm ET

Last week I posted a short story from our sister publication, Plastics & Rubber Weekly, about a pair of scientists who want governments around the world to classify certain kinds of plastic waste as "hazardous." I thought that would be the end of the discussion.

But the debate is continuing to get attention, so let's take a closer look.

As the first story noted, the issue was raised in a "Comment" column in the periodical Nature: "Classify plastic waste as hazardous." Two California-based graduate students -- Chelsea Rochman and Mark Anthony Browne -- claim that labeling some plastics -– specifically PVC, polystyrene, polyurethane and polycarbonate -- as hazardous would cut health risks and protect wildlife. ("Pair urges government to classify some plastic waste as hazardous.")

The pair wrote: "We believe that if countries classified the most harmful plastics as hazardous, their environmental agencies would have the power to restore affected habitats and prevent more dangerous debris from accumulating. Ultimately, such a move could boost research on new polymers and replace the most problematic materials with safer ones."

They write later in the article: "We feel that the physical dangers of plastic debris are well enough established, and the suggestions of the chemical dangers sufficiently worrying, that the biggest producers of plastic waste -- the United States, Europe and China -- must act now. These countries should agree to classify as hazardous the most harmful plastics, including those that cannot be reused or recycled because they lack durability or contain mixtures of materials that cannot be separated."

The precautionary principle is a key part of their point. According to the article, "We believe that manufacturers of plastic, along with the food and textile industries that rely heavily on it, should have to prove that their products and packaging are safe."

I sympathize with the authors' concern about plastic marine debris -- this is a real problem that the global plastics industry was slow to address, but now is finally starting to take action. But the idea that the answer to the problem is to declare large segments of the plastic industry "hazardous" is an extreme and unreasonable approach.

First, the safety of PVC, polystyrene, polyurethane and polycarbonate have been investigated for years. While the fine details may be debated, and some materials are not appropriate in certain applications, the government agencies charged with deciding chemical safety have largely determined that these plastics are not "hazardous."

Second, I don't anticipate that governments will be eager to take on all the legal and regulatory burdens that would result from such a determination. Better to let them focus on materials that clearly are dangerous, rather than keeping them busy with lesser threats.

American Chemistry Council reaction

Steve Russell, vice president of plastics for the American Chemistry Council, issued a statement on the Nature commentary that's worth sharing:

"America's plastics makers agree that litter doesn't belong in our oceans, waterways or any part of our natural environment. And, the global plastics industry has organized to combat the problem, sponsoring research and working in public-private partnerships. But the suggestions by the commenters in the journal Nature are neither justified nor helpful.

"We agree that marine debris deserves serious attention; but it also deserves serious debate. The suggestion to classify plastic as hazardous waste does not reach that mark. ... Plastics used in food contact and medical device applications are evaluated for safety by governments around the world. And the plastics identified by the authors as 'higher priorities' are used in durable applications (pipes, siding, roofing, refrigerators) which are not generally littered or found in the ocean.

"Scientists have long understood that persistent organic pollutants (POPs) can bind to organic compounds, such as plastics; what is currently not known is whether pollutants bound to plastics are then bioavailable or a significant route for exposure to marine life. For example, NOAA has stated that 'POPs have a high affinity for plastic in seawater. This is the basis for several POP sampling techniques, including passive sampling. While this high affinity results in elevated POP concentrations on microplastic particles, these POPs may not be readily bioavailable.'

"America's plastics makers agree more research is needed on this subject, and we are supporting a comprehensive scientific review of this issue by the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection (GESAMP)working with international agencies and NOAA."

Should common plastics be labeled toxic?

For the last word today -- or, if you're so inclined, an opportunity to jump into the debate -- check out The New York Times' Rendezvous blog, which asked readers "Should common plastics be labeled toxic?"

So far 14 readers have weighed in, with the majority in favor of the proposal. Not a scientific sample, to be sure, but evidence that the public image of plastics is not nearly as high as many in the industry would like.

Recent Blog Posts

Cool dad breaks Hot Wheels record   April 23, 2015 4:20 pm ET
Molding company founder and art collector makes headlines in Chicago   April 22, 2015 11:05 am ET
People who ditch single-use plastic bags eat more cookies   April 20, 2015 11:38 am ET
From space to Earth   April 8, 2015 11:31 am ET
Plastics recyclers suffering, PN pricing in the news   April 6, 2015 11:43 am ET
Plastic gets official for March Madness   March 19, 2015 10:47 am ET


Extreme and unreasonable: declaring plastic waste 'hazardous'

By Don Loepp

Published: February 18, 2013 12:19 pm ET
Updated: February 18, 2013 1:09 pm ET

Post Your Comments

Back to story

Market Reports

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Injection Molding Market Analysis & Processor Rankings

Plastics News BUNDLED package contains our in-depth Market Analysis of the Injection Molding segment. You will gain keen insight on current trends and our economic outlook.

As a BONUS this includes PN's updated 2014 database of North American Injection Molders RANKED by sales volume. Sort, merge, mail & prospect by end market, materials processed, region, # of plants and more.

Learn more

Plastics Caps & Closures Market Report

The annual recap of top trends and future outlook for the plastics caps & closures market features interviews with industry thought leaders and Bill Wood’s economic forecast of trends in growing end markets. You will also gain insight on trends in caps design, materials, machinery, molds & tooling and reviews of mergers & acquisitions.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 15, 2015 - September 17, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

More Events