JM Eagle found liable for faulty PVC pipes

By Catherine Kavanaugh
Staff Reporter

Published: November 15, 2013 12:30 pm ET
Updated: November 15, 2013 12:57 pm ET

Related to this story

Topics Legal, Construction, Municipal water & sewer, Extrusion, Pipe/Profile/Tubing
Companies & Associations J-M Manufacturing Co. Inc.

A California jury found J-M Manufacturing Inc. knowingly manufactured and sold substandard PVC pipes to government entities for water and sewage systems across the country from 1996 to 2006.

The unanimous verdict reached Thursday comes seven years after whistle-blower John Hendrix alleged J-M, which is now called JM Eagle, violated the False Claims Act by selling products with shorter life spans than promised.

Hendrix is a plaintiff along with the states of Nevada, New Mexico and Virginia, 21 cities in California and 21 water districts in California. Originally filed by Hendrix in 2006, the suit was unsealed Feb. 8, 2010, in Los Angeles in U.S. District Court, when the government entities formally joined the suit.

Los Angeles-based JM Eagle, which is the largest pipe extruder in North America according to Plastics News' ranking, plans to appeal the verdict. It said the lawsuit was brought by a disgruntled former employee.

JM Eagle is on the line for paying a yet-to-be-determined amount of damages to the plaintiffs, as well as dozens of other states, cities and water districts that bought the company's pipe products but didn't join the lawsuit.

During the seven-week trial, the jury heard technical testimony about various pipe failures, Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) standards and the forensic analysis of plastic to determine the root causes of failure. They also saw more than 300 JM Eagle documents.

Next phase: determining damages

Jurors deliberated for a week before reaching their verdict, which ends the first phase of the trial that began Sept. 17 before U.S. District Judge George H. Wu. Damages will be determined in a second phase of the trial. Hendrix is entitled to 15-25 percent of the amount recovered.

The trial exposed JM Eagle's deliberate efforts to cut costs by using shoddy manufacturing processes to make weaker but more profitable PVC pipe, according to Eric Havian, a lawyer with Phillips & Cohen LLP who represented the plaintiffs.

"The jury obviously decided that JM Eagle management cared only about the amount of pipe JM produced, not the quality of the pipe," Havian said in a statement. "JM Eagle deceived outside inspection agencies and ignored over a decade of a failing test results."

JM Eagle officials respect but strongly disagree with the jury, according to Neal Gordon, the company's vice president of marketing and waterworks sales.

"During a seven-week trial with over 20 witnesses, JM Eagle presented irrefutable evidence that our products meet and even exceed national standards based on hundreds of independent tests and audits by outside certifying agencies," Gordon said in a statement.

Even after learning about the lawsuit, Gordon said, two plaintiffs in the case acquired tens of thousands of additional feet of JM Eagle pipe that were installed in their public utility systems.

Gordon said another plaintiff, the City of Reno — which maintained that three pipe breaks in a wastewater reclamation project supported the false claim allegations — nominated the same project for a 2002 Outstanding Achievement in Civil Engineering award, calling JM Eagle piping "the backbone" of the project.

In addition to Reno, the claims in the trial focused on the city of Norfolk, Va., and the Calleguas Municipal Water District, South Tahoe Public Utility District and Palmdale Water District, which are all in California.

Those five government entities were selected from the larger group as exemplar plaintiffs. However, all the states, cities and water districts named in the case could share in the damages that are recovered. The damages are supposed to cover the cost to replace pipes that have failed as well as the cost government entities will pay to replace PVC pipes sooner than expected.

Managers say production quotas led to cutting corners

During the trial, JM Eagle plant managers told the court they were under pressure to meet production quotas and that lead to cutting corners.

Hendrix worked as an engineer in the product assurance division of a New Jersey facility of J-M. He alleged the company cherry-picked the product it tested and much of what it sold did not meet industry standards — but he did not take the stand to testify.

Other witnesses told the court that plant managers removed "reject" tags from pipe identified as substandard and shipped it to customers. When customers complained, the witnesses said they were told to blame factors other than manufacturing defects, such as improper installation.

PVC pipe has failed across Nevada and will have to be replaced sooner than expected, creating a "budget nightmare" for states and cities there, according to Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto.

"We know from firsthand experience that this PVC pipe will prematurely leak or break and can jeopardize lives," she said in a statement.

Judge to rule on settlement with Formosa

In a related matter, Judge Wu is scheduled to rule Dec. 19 on a proposed $22.5 million settlement between the plaintiff's and JM Eagle's former parent company, Formosa Plastics Corp. USA.

Formosa acquired Johns-Mansfield Corp. in 1982 and changed the name to J-M. Walter Wang, son of the late Formosa founder and Taiwanese billionaire Y.C. Wang, was later named J-M president. The lawsuit says that under his leadership, a series of cost-cutting measures was implemented — switching to inferior ingredients, accelerating production and not maintaining extruders — that undermined the quality of J-M's PVC pipe products.

In the proposed settlement, Formosa, which supplied some of the PVC resin for J-M pipes, admits no liability and agrees to settle all state and federal claims to avoid further litigation.

In the JM Eagle trial, government officials are lauding the jury's decision. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli said in a statement the verdict affirms the company is liable for falsely representing the quality and durability of its product, which leaked and cost cities in that state millions to repair or replace.

New Mexico Attorney General Gary King added, "JM defrauded New Mexico taxpayers when they sold us substandard products and jeopardized our citizens' access to clean drinking water. By joining in this suit, we are sending a message to JM and other would-be fraudsters that they will be held accountable."


Comments

JM Eagle found liable for faulty PVC pipes

By Catherine Kavanaugh
Staff Reporter

Published: November 15, 2013 12:30 pm ET
Updated: November 15, 2013 12:57 pm ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Kingspan adds more European production with Joris Ide acquisition

January 27, 2015 10:30 am ET

Kingspan Group plc has purchased insulated panels and building systems supplier Joris Ide Group for 315 million euros ($356 million).    More

Image

Auto supplier Cooper-Standard to trim operations in Europe

January 22, 2015 11:08 am ET

Novi, Mich.-based Cooper-Sandard Holdings Inc. said Jan. 21 it plans to consolidate its operations in Europe, including reducing manufacturing in...    More

Image

New Vinyl Building Council leader out to build on grassroots efforts

January 20, 2015 12:54 pm ET

As the new executive director of the Vinyl Building Council, Kevin Koonce will oversee advocacy for the most-used plastic in building and...    More

Image

Plastics help create net-zero energy home

January 20, 2015 3:31 pm ET

The New American Home — a working lab of best construction practices since 1984 — has reached its greenest goal yet with plastic pushing...    More

Image

Public utilities appeal latest decision in JM Eagle case

January 20, 2015 1:08 pm ET

The law firm representing public utilities in a False Claims Act lawsuit against J-M Manufacturing Co. — now called JM Eagle — plans to ap...    More

Market Reports

Plastics in Automotive: Innovation & Emerging Trends

This special report newly released by PN and sponsored by The Conair Group examines current trends in the use of plastics in automotive, materials innovations and the changing landscape. It includes a review of legislative/regulatory activity impacting vehicle development and lightweighting, market opportunities & challenges for mold and toolmakers, innovative design strategies being implemented by major OEMs and suppliers, as well as a review of key indicators in Canada, Mexico, Brazil and China.

Learn more

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Injection Molding Market Analysis & Processor Rankings

Plastics News BUNDLED package contains our in-depth Market Analysis of the Injection Molding segment. You will gain keen insight on current trends and our economic outlook.

As a BONUS this includes PN's updated 2014 database of North American Injection Molders RANKED by sales volume. Sort, merge, mail & prospect by end market, materials processed, region, # of plants and more.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 16, 2015 - September 18, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

More Events