Conflicting studies continue debate on BPA

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: March 14, 2014 11:58 am ET
Updated: March 14, 2014 12:01 pm ET

Related to this story

Topics Public Policy, Materials Suppliers

WASHINGTON — Conflicting claims by separate BPA exposure studies are adding fuel the fire in the continuing saga of bisphenol A.

Findings by Cincinnati Cancer Center researchers published in PLOS ONE say small amounts of BPA in men’s urine could be a cancer marker, making it the first study to claim that low-dose BPA may cause cancer development in the prostate.

In the study, published in early March, researchers assessed the prostate-specific antigen of 60 urology patients using urine samples. Higher levels of BPA were found in prostate cancer patients than in non-prostate cancer patients, and the difference was more significant in patients younger than 65.

Principle investigator Shuk-mei Ho, director of the Cincinnati Cancer Center, and professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, said human exposure to BPA is a common occurrence and while animal studies have shown that BPA contributes to development of prostate cancer, human data is scarce.

“We examined the centrosome profile of prostate cancer cells treated with BPA and found that treatment with BPA increased the number of cells with abnormal centrosomes,” Ho said in a news release. “All of these findings reveal a previously unknown relationship between BPA exposure and prostate cancer and suggest a mechanism underlying the role of BPA in cellular transformation and disease progression. With this insight, we hope to further investigate ways we can decrease exposures to potentially cancerous-causing chemicals in every day products and substances and reduce the onset of prostate cancer in men.”

The American Chemistry Council, however, says the UC study is flawed and misleading because it is based on a misunderstanding about how BPA is processed in the human body.

“The fundamental flaw in this report is the authors’ complete misunderstanding of important analysis from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on interpretation of BPA exposure measurements from single urinary spot samples. Because BPA is processed quickly in the body and eliminated, measuring BPA levels at one point in time provides essentially no information about BPA levels at an earlier time period,” said Steven Hentges of ACC’s Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group via email. “In direct contrast, the authors suggest that a single urine sample collected from study participants when prostate cancer is diagnosed could represent their exposures when prostate cancer initiated and developed, which likely would have been many decades earlier. This suggestion is absolutely contrary to the analysis from CDC and, accordingly, this study has no capability to establish a cause-and-effect relationship from the reported statistical associations.”

BPA, which is a feedstock for polycarbonate and epoxy, has been the subject of hundreds of studies, some of which suggest a link with adverse health effects while others exonerate it.

In fact, another BPA study by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health, released weeks before the UC study, found that low doses of BPA had no effect on the health of rats.

While rats exposed in the womb and as newborns to the two highest doses of BPA had lower body weights, abnormal female reproductive development and altered hormone levels, there were no such effects when the rats were exposed to the low doses that humans are routinely exposed to.

Researchers exposed rats to BPA a few days after conception and continued through sexual maturity. Doses ranged from about 70 times the amount that Americans typically get through their diet to millions of times that amount. Even when rats got more than 70,000 times what a typical American ingests, there was no change in body weight, reproductive organs or hormone levels, the scientists reported. It took exposures millions of times higher than what humans typically receive to cause adverse effects like lower body weights, abnormal reproductive development or altered hormone levels, the study said.

The research is part of a two-year FDA project — funded by the FDA and the National Institutes of Health — to determine the toxicity of BPA, which is critical to setting any future regulations on its use in food products. A group of academics from several universities working with the FDA will be conducting more studies over the next year.


Comments

Conflicting studies continue debate on BPA

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: March 14, 2014 11:58 am ET
Updated: March 14, 2014 12:01 pm ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Foster building medical polymers plant

September 19, 2014 1:39 pm ET

Foster Delivery Science is investing $8 million in a new plant in Putnam, Conn., for production of medical polymer blends, as well as rods, film or...    More

Image

BP to restart damaged PTA unit in limited capacity by November

September 19, 2014 10:27 am ET

British Petroleum plc may restart its fire-damaged purified terephthalic acid (PTA) feedstock unit in South Carolina in late October or early...    More

Image

Bayer spinning off plastics business

September 18, 2014 8:49 am ET

Bayer AG will spin off its MaterialScience plastics group into a separate, publicly-traded company within the next 12 to 18 months.    More

Image

Study: 75 percent of Australia's ocean debris is plastic

September 18, 2014 7:48 pm ET

About 75 percent of the trash found in the waters off Australia's beaches is plastic, with most of that coming from local sources rather than sea-...    More

Image

Investor group wants DuPont to split in two

September 18, 2014 7:37 pm ET

Investment firm Trian Fund Management LP is calling for plastics and chemicals giant DuPont Co. to split itself into two firms, one of which would inc...    More

Market Reports

Plastics Caps & Closures Market Report

The annual recap of top trends and future outlook for the plastics caps & closures market features interviews with industry thought leaders and Bill Wood’s economic forecast of trends in growing end markets. You will also gain insight on trends in caps design, materials, machinery, molds & tooling and reviews of mergers & acquisitions.

Learn more

Shale Gas Market - Analysis of North American Region

This report highlights the impact of shale-based natural gas on the North American plastics market and features an in-depth analysis of production trends in the United States during 2013 and a forecast for 2014 and beyond.

Learn more

Thermoformed Packaging 2014 Market Review & Outlook – North America

This in-depth report analyzes economic and market trends, legislative/regulatory activity impacting supply and demand, business opportunities and threats, materials pricing, manufacturing technology, as well as growth strategies being implemented by thermoformed packaging companies.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

January 14, 2015 - January 14, 2015Plastics in Automotive

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

More Events