Shrink-sleeve labels create a huge expense for PET recyclers

By Jim Johnson
Senior Staff Reporter

Published: March 19, 2014 10:46 am ET
Updated: March 19, 2014 10:50 am ET

Image By: Plastics News Steve Alexander, director of the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers

Related to this story

Topics Packaging, Sustainability, Recycling
Companies & Associations Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers

ORLANDO, FLA. — Dealing with shrink-sleeve labels, new research shows, is an expensive proposition for plastic bottle recyclers.

Members of the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers are on the front line of this issue as they are increasingly being challenged to process an ever-growing number of plastic bottles utilizing the full-sleeve labels known to provide additional visual pizzazz on the shelf.

But while shrink-sleeve labels are an effective marketing tool, they are denting the wallets of plastics recyclers.

“There is a significant cost associated with the use of shrink-sleeve labels today that’s damaging to the recycle industry” said John Standish, APR technical director, at an association meeting in Orlando. “And it limits the availability of post-consumer material.”

APR, through its research, has come up with an estimate of just how much extra recyclers are spending to remove and deal with the labels as they process bottles and create recycled PET flake.

Use of shrink-sleeve labels has been growing in recent years, with one estimate indicating they now represent 7-9 percent of the total recycling stream. That’s up from 5-6 percent in 2012 and about 3 percent in 2011. The figure was about 1 percent in 2007.

Shrink-sleeve labels are most commonly found in recycled bottle bales made from curbside collection, the trade group said.

Recyclers are spending anywhere from 2-4 cents per pound of reprocessed plastic to remove the shrink-sleeve labels, which are typically incompatible with PET recycling.

That’s not 2-4 cents per pound of bottles that have shrink sleeve labels. That’s 2-4 cents for every pound of bottle plastic they reprocess.

While that added amount might not seem like much on a per-pound level, the numbers become more significant when expressed on a per-ton cost basis, which was estimated to be $40 to $70 at the association’s meeting.

For a company that reprocesses 70 million pounds per year, and using a mid-range estimate of 3 cents per pound of added cost, the financial hit could be $2 million per year, said APR member Curt Cozart, owner of plastics recycling consulting firm Common Sense Solutions Inc.

Weilong Chiang is a senior principal engineer for PepsiCo and helped lead APR’s investigation into the impacts of shrink-sleeve labels.

“The shrink label problem is hurting the profitability and the financial health of the PET recycling industry and also diverting investment from the areas which would add more value to increase the supply and the quality,” Chiang said.

APR, as part of raising the red flag regarding shrink-sleeve labels, has sliced and diced the issue from several different views in the recent months. Members split into a handful of teams to examine the problem from various fronts, including: industry impact; bottle sorting; label removal; use of floatable labels; the impact of ink bleeding on recycled plastic; and testing methods.

APR Executive Director Steve Alexander pointed to all the work association members have done in recent months examining the issue and said the work should not stop there.

“This is not the end. This is the beginning. So we go forward,” he said about the need to communicate the association’s views on the impact of shrink-sleeve labels. “This does us no good if we don’t tell anybody about it.”

Chiang indicated that de-labeling machines, currently being used by some recyclers, are a high-cost, but expedient partial stopgap to address shrink sleeves until floatable labels or other solutions are widely adopted.

“Shrink labels continue to cause problems in yield loss and quality deterioration and capability for the recyclers to supply recycled PET,” he said.


Comments

Shrink-sleeve labels create a huge expense for PET recyclers

By Jim Johnson
Senior Staff Reporter

Published: March 19, 2014 10:46 am ET
Updated: March 19, 2014 10:50 am ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Ineos making its UK shale play

November 21, 2014 9:29 am ET

Chemical giant Ineos Group AG is planning to be the biggest player in the United Kingdom's shale gas industry.    More

Image

PET film maker Evertis expanding production in Mexico, Brazil, Portugal

November 20, 2014 2:52 pm ET

Evertis, a PET film maker, is expanding production at plants in Mexico, Brazil and Portugal, the company said.    More

Image

Coveris changes culture, eyes IPO

November 20, 2014 1:40 pm ET

CEO Gary Masse has a simple message, and some new math, for everyone at Coveris Holdings Corp. Get on board or get out of the way.    More

Image

New York City officials avoid taking a stand on plastic bag fee

November 20, 2014 11:28 am ET

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration claimed Nov. 19 to be committed to dramatically reducing plastic bag consumption in New York City, but ...    More

Image

Agilyx facing nearly $50,000 in fines from Oregon DEQ

November 20, 2014 11:59 am ET

Agilyx Corp., a plastic waste-to-oil company, is facing nearly $50,000 in fines for alleged hazardous waste violations at its Tigard, Ore., research f...    More

Market Reports

Plastics in Brazil - State of the Industry Report

This in-depth report examines the Brazilian plastics industry from a historical and geographical context. Our analysts provide insight on economic trends and forecasts, growing manufacturing sectors that utilize plastics, private investment opportunities, market environment challenges, and innovations in R&D.

Data tables and charts on producer prices, trade, plastics production and end market indicators is also included.

Learn more

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Injection Molders Market Report & Ranking 2014

This special package contains our 132-page 2014 Market Report on the Injection Molding segment and our exclusive 2014 RANKINGS database of 500+ Injection Molders for a discounted package price.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

January 14, 2015 - January 14, 2015Plastics in Automotive

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 16, 2015 - September 18, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

October 27, 2015 - October 29, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - New York - 2015

More Events