Contraceptive care coverage also an issue at some plastics firms

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: July 3, 2014 12:08 pm ET
Updated: July 3, 2014 1:11 pm ET

Image By: Grote Industries Inc. Grote Industries Inc., a maker of lighting and other safety systems for commercial vehicles, has its own case pending in court on contraceptive coverage mandate.

Related to this story

Topics Public Policy United States
Companies & Associations

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court waited until the very end of its term to deliver a 5-4 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, declaring privately held, for-profit companies should be allowed exemption from providing certain types of birth control for religious reasons.

But for some plastics companies, the fight had already been going on for years.

While the Hobby Lobby case was the one suit the high court chose to consider, it was only one of the nearly 80 pending cases from around the country challenging the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) contraception mandate, including several from plastics processors.

Companies including Sioux Chief Manufacturing Co. Inc., a plumbing OEM that works in both copper shaping and plastic injection molding based in Peculiar, Mo.; Sterling Heights, Mich.-based injection molder M&N Plastics Inc.; Minnetonka, Minn., medical device manufacturer Annex Medical Inc.; and automotive molder Grote Industries Inc. in Madison, Ind., have been waiting — some for years — with their own cases on hold while the court considered the Hobby Lobby case.

The common thread through all the cases is that the plaintiffs maintain the federal government, by requiring contraceptive coverage under ACA, is infringing on their religious views. Like Hobby Lobby, many of the companies already covered birth control under their insurance plans, but oppose the ACA requirement that health plans also cover the so-called morning-after pill, which they argue causes abortions.

The Department of Health and Human Services had amended the rule to exempt churches and houses of worship and to provide special concessions to some religiously affiliated entities such as Catholic hospitals and universities. However, the agency stopped short of allowing other types of employers to opt out of the mandate for personal religious reasons.

The mandate put family businesses “in a terrible position” having to choose between violating their faith or being punished by the government for following their faith, said Bryan Beauman a lawyer with Lexington, Ky., firm Sturgill, Turner, Barker and Moloney, PLLC who worked on the Grote case through the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal group.

“Americans, we don’t surrender our freedom when we open a family business,” Beauman said. “All of us must be free to live and work according to our beliefs without fear of government punishment.”

Grote, a family-owned company since its founding in 1901 by William D. Grote, estimated it would have faced approximately $928,000 in fines if the company had refused to cover certain types of contraception to which the devout Catholic owners object for religious reasons.

Grote originally filed suit in October 2012, but the U.S. District Court in New Albany, Ind., denied the Grotes relief from the federal mandate.

The family appealed to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in January 2013, getting a temporary injunction pending the appeal a month later. The three-judge panel ruled in Grote’s favor in November 2013 in a 154-page decision. Another injunction was issued after the government filed the last possible appeal, but the Supreme Court refused to hear the Grote case because it was already considering a similar case — Burwell v Hobby Lobby.

Now that the decision has been handed down, is the fight over for small business owners with strong religious convictions? Justice Samuel Alito writes in the majority opinion that the White House provided an out for nonprofit religious corporations, asking why the same standard cannot be applied to this apply to the for-profit employers as well.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the Administration considering its options. “It is our view... that Congress needs to take action to solve this problem that’s been created and the Administration stands ready to work with them to do so,” Earnest told reporters.

But those with pending cases expect to soon have a permanent injunction in place.

“I can’t begin to predict what the Obama Administration is going to do next,” Beauman said, “But things look very, very strong for folks like the Grotes who want to run their companies according to their beliefs.”


Comments

Contraceptive care coverage also an issue at some plastics firms

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: July 3, 2014 12:08 pm ET
Updated: July 3, 2014 1:11 pm ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Congress makes another attempt to update chemical regulations

April 15, 2015 11:09 am ET

A new Congress means taking yet another crack at updating the 1970s law regulating U.S. chemical manufacturing, transportation and use.    More

Image

GN Thermoforming changes management following founder's arrest

April 15, 2015 4:47 pm ET

GN Thermoforming Equipment officials say Georg Nemeskeri has stepped away from active involvement with the company he founded 34 years ago and a...    More

Image

OSHA targets firm making plastic balls used in fracking

April 15, 2015 4:55 pm ET

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration announced that it may fine a manufacturing company in New York for 48 alleged violations of...    More

Image

Economic déjà vu: strong spring growth expected after a rough winter

April 15, 2015 2:03 pm ET

The long, harsh winter is finally over, and the first quarter of the calendar is history. So now is an appropriate time to review the emerging trends ...    More

Image

Arizona bans bag bans, mandatory recycling

April 15, 2015 11:52 am ET

Swimming against the stream of bag bans around the country, a new Arizona law prohibits local bans, taxes or fees on plastic bags and other containers...    More

Market Reports

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Injection Molding Market Analysis & Processor Rankings

Plastics News BUNDLED package contains our in-depth Market Analysis of the Injection Molding segment. You will gain keen insight on current trends and our economic outlook.

As a BONUS this includes PN's updated 2014 database of North American Injection Molders RANKED by sales volume. Sort, merge, mail & prospect by end market, materials processed, region, # of plants and more.

Learn more

Plastics Caps & Closures Market Report

The annual recap of top trends and future outlook for the plastics caps & closures market features interviews with industry thought leaders and Bill Wood’s economic forecast of trends in growing end markets. You will also gain insight on trends in caps design, materials, machinery, molds & tooling and reviews of mergers & acquisitions.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 15, 2015 - September 17, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

More Events