Contraceptive care coverage also an issue at some plastics firms

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: July 3, 2014 12:08 pm ET
Updated: July 3, 2014 1:11 pm ET

Image By: Grote Industries Inc. Grote Industries Inc., a maker of lighting and other safety systems for commercial vehicles, has its own case pending in court on contraceptive coverage mandate.

Related to this story

Topics Public Policy, United States

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court waited until the very end of its term to deliver a 5-4 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, declaring privately held, for-profit companies should be allowed exemption from providing certain types of birth control for religious reasons.

But for some plastics companies, the fight had already been going on for years.

While the Hobby Lobby case was the one suit the high court chose to consider, it was only one of the nearly 80 pending cases from around the country challenging the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) contraception mandate, including several from plastics processors.

Companies including Sioux Chief Manufacturing Co. Inc., a plumbing OEM that works in both copper shaping and plastic injection molding based in Peculiar, Mo.; Sterling Heights, Mich.-based injection molder M&N Plastics Inc.; Minnetonka, Minn., medical device manufacturer Annex Medical Inc.; and automotive molder Grote Industries Inc. in Madison, Ind., have been waiting — some for years — with their own cases on hold while the court considered the Hobby Lobby case.

The common thread through all the cases is that the plaintiffs maintain the federal government, by requiring contraceptive coverage under ACA, is infringing on their religious views. Like Hobby Lobby, many of the companies already covered birth control under their insurance plans, but oppose the ACA requirement that health plans also cover the so-called morning-after pill, which they argue causes abortions.

The Department of Health and Human Services had amended the rule to exempt churches and houses of worship and to provide special concessions to some religiously affiliated entities such as Catholic hospitals and universities. However, the agency stopped short of allowing other types of employers to opt out of the mandate for personal religious reasons.

The mandate put family businesses “in a terrible position” having to choose between violating their faith or being punished by the government for following their faith, said Bryan Beauman a lawyer with Lexington, Ky., firm Sturgill, Turner, Barker and Moloney, PLLC who worked on the Grote case through the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal group.

“Americans, we don’t surrender our freedom when we open a family business,” Beauman said. “All of us must be free to live and work according to our beliefs without fear of government punishment.”

Grote, a family-owned company since its founding in 1901 by William D. Grote, estimated it would have faced approximately $928,000 in fines if the company had refused to cover certain types of contraception to which the devout Catholic owners object for religious reasons.

Grote originally filed suit in October 2012, but the U.S. District Court in New Albany, Ind., denied the Grotes relief from the federal mandate.

The family appealed to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in January 2013, getting a temporary injunction pending the appeal a month later. The three-judge panel ruled in Grote’s favor in November 2013 in a 154-page decision. Another injunction was issued after the government filed the last possible appeal, but the Supreme Court refused to hear the Grote case because it was already considering a similar case — Burwell v Hobby Lobby.

Now that the decision has been handed down, is the fight over for small business owners with strong religious convictions? Justice Samuel Alito writes in the majority opinion that the White House provided an out for nonprofit religious corporations, asking why the same standard cannot be applied to this apply to the for-profit employers as well.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the Administration considering its options. “It is our view... that Congress needs to take action to solve this problem that’s been created and the Administration stands ready to work with them to do so,” Earnest told reporters.

But those with pending cases expect to soon have a permanent injunction in place.

“I can’t begin to predict what the Obama Administration is going to do next,” Beauman said, “But things look very, very strong for folks like the Grotes who want to run their companies according to their beliefs.”


Comments

Contraceptive care coverage also an issue at some plastics firms

By Gayle S. Putrich
Staff Reporter

Published: July 3, 2014 12:08 pm ET
Updated: July 3, 2014 1:11 pm ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Coveris makes another flexible packaging buy

August 22, 2014 9:34 am ET

Coveris Holdings is continuing its rapid acquisition pace, this time picking up flexible print specialist Learoyd Packaging (Holdings) Ltd. to boost...    More

Image

Non-recyclable items gumming up the works at recycling centers

August 21, 2014 3:46 pm ET

The influx of all sorts of unacceptable items at recycling centers has gotten to the point that Charlotte, N.C.-based ReCommunity is trying to bring...    More

Image

NanoHolding, Applied Nanotech merge to form PEN Inc.

August 21, 2014 4:44 pm ET

Nanotechnology firms NanoHolding Inc. and Applied Nanotech Holdings Inc. are merging to create PEN Inc., a publicly held firm whose product mix will...    More

Image

Investment firm specializes in emerging polymer firms in Ohio

August 21, 2014 3:20 pm ET

A plastics market veteran is working with an investment firm and a research foundation to help commercialize polymer technology in the Buckeye State.    More

Image

Report predicts growth for flexible packaging

August 21, 2014 12:34 pm ET

Flexible packaging in the United States grew last year and is expected to continue to grow this year, according to a new report by the Flexible Packag...    More

Market Reports

Thermoformed Packaging 2014 Market Review & Outlook North America

This in-depth report analyzes economic and market trends, legislative/regulatory activity impacting supply and demand, business opportunities and threats, materials pricing, manufacturing technology, as well as growth strategies being implemented by thermoformed packaging companies.

Learn more

Pipe, Profile & Tubing Extrusion in North America 2014

U.S. demand for extruded plastics is expected to grow by 3 percent in 2014, with PVC remaining the largest segment.

Plastic pipe will post the strongest gains through 2018, continuing to take market share from competing materials in a range of markets.

Our latest market report provides in-depth analysis of current trends and their financial impact on the pipe, profile and tubing extrusion industry in North America.

Learn more

2014 Injection Molding Industry Report

GROWTH, OPPORTUNITY IN SIGHT FOR INJECTION MOLDERS IN 2014

In the wake of the economic turbulence earlier in this decade, molders today find themselves in much better shape. Molders are gaining a competitive advantage by investing in people, equipment and seeking inroads into new markets on a global scale.

Growth in the injection molding industry is going to be driven by low financing costs and a continued move to reshore some business.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

September 10, 2014 - September 12, 2014Plastics Caps & Closures 2014

January 14, 2015 - January 14, 2015Plastics in Automotive

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

More Events