New regulations favor plastic manufacturers

Michael J. Devereux

Published: August 13, 2014 11:03 am ET
Updated: August 13, 2014 11:10 am ET

Devereux

Related to this story

Topics Public Policy, Financial

In the past nine months, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued two sets of regulations that are favorable to plastics manufacturers. These regulations relate to the definition of research expenditures and the ability to elect the simplified method of calculating the R&D tax credit on amended returns.

Section 174

On Sept. 5, 2013, the Treasury proposed five changes to regulations defining research expenditures under Internal Revenue Code Section 174. As an added bonus, Treasury indicated that taxpayers may rely upon these proposed regulations for all tax years. On July 18, these regulations were finalized with minimal changes.

The first change to the Section 174 regulations likely has the most significant impact for plastics manufacturers. The proposed regulations provide that if expenditures qualify as research or experimental expenditures, it is irrelevant whether a resulting product is ultimately sold or used in the taxpayer’s trade or business. Plastics processors should be considering whether the costs of newly developed molds, prototype parts and machinery or equipment that is developed in-house may qualify as research expenditures.

Other changes include the application of the definition of research to depreciable property, the definition of a pilot model and makes clear that the general rule that the costs of producing a product after uncertainty concerning the development or improvement of a product is eliminated are not eligible expenses under Section 174 because these costs are not for research or experimentation.

Finally, the proposed regulations introduce a shrinking back rule to the Section 174 expenditures, requiring taxpayers to “shrink back” to the subset of activities or expenditures that are directly involved in research, thereby limiting the amount one may classify as research. Historically, the internal revenue code has provided that research expenditures include all such costs incident to the development of a product. However, the shrinking back rule is not a new concept. It has been part of the fabric of IRC Section 41 — The Credit for Increasing Research Activities — for over 15 years. For instance, if a taxpayer is developing a new mold and its research activities relate to the cores and cavities of the mold and not the mold base, the taxpayer may be required to “shrink back” its research supply expenditures to the materials used and tested in the development of the cores and cavities and exclude the cost of the mold base. Contrast this example with a company that designs and develops a custom mold base in conjunction with the cores and cavities. This may be done due to complex venting or water-line designs. In this instance, the mold base is an instrumental part of the design of the mold and may qualify as a qualified research expenditure.

Section 41

On June 3, the Treasury proposed regulations indicating that the IRS will now begin allowing taxpayers to claim the Alternative

Simplified Credit (ASC) on amended tax returns if the taxpayer had not claimed the research credit on its original tax return. For taxpayers not claiming the credit in prior years, this development can mean significant savings.

The R&D tax credit is meant to encourage taxpayers to increase their research activities. As such, taxpayers must exceed a base amount in order to qualify for the tax credit. Two methods exist: the traditional method and the ASC. The ASC method allows utilization of more recent documentation that may be more readily available than what was previously required. Before these new regulations, taxpayers that amended their return to claim the credit may have been required to rely on information from 1984-1988 to claim the R&D Tax Credit.

The R&D tax credit is one of the most under-utilized tax savings opportunities for companies in the plastics industry. The R&D tax credit rewards companies who invest resources in innovation, product development, mold design, new materials or resins, and process development/improvement. In addition to federal tax savings, over 30 states have a similar program that rewards companies for the development or improvement to its products or processes.

Michael J. Devereux is partner and director of manufacturing and distribution services for Mueller Prost.


Comments

New regulations favor plastic manufacturers

Michael J. Devereux

Published: August 13, 2014 11:03 am ET
Updated: August 13, 2014 11:10 am ET

Post Your Comments


Back to story


More stories

Image

Indian plastics group targets waste

November 24, 2014 12:46 pm ET

An Indian plastics environmental group and the country's largest brand for packaged water, Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd., have launched a trial...    More

Image

Wilbur Ross steps down from IAC board

November 24, 2014 11:38 am ET

Financier Wilbur Ross Jr. has resigned from the boards of International Automotive Components Group SA and its subsidiaries due to new regulatory...    More

Image

EU sets consumption goal of 40 plastic bags per person by 2025

November 24, 2014 9:27 am ET

Representatives of European Union member states hammered out a deal Nov. 21 to reduce consumption of lightweight plastic bags to 40 bags per person...    More

Image

Residents ask court to close pipe maker

November 21, 2014 3:22 pm ET

Residents living by National Pipe & Plastics Inc.'s new factory in an industrial zone of Endicott, N.Y., say the facility has “devastated the...    More

Image

Ineos making its UK shale play

November 21, 2014 9:29 am ET

Chemical giant Ineos Group AG is planning to be the biggest player in the United Kingdom's shale gas industry.    More

Market Reports

Plastics in Brazil - State of the Industry Report

This in-depth report examines the Brazilian plastics industry from a historical and geographical context. Our analysts provide insight on economic trends and forecasts, growing manufacturing sectors that utilize plastics, private investment opportunities, market environment challenges, and innovations in R&D.

Data tables and charts on producer prices, trade, plastics production and end market indicators is also included.

Learn more

Plastics Recycling Trends in North America

This report is a review and analysis of the North American Plastics Recycling Industry, including key trends and statistics based on 2013 performance. We examine market environment factors, regulatory issues, industry challenges, key drivers and emerging trends in post-consumer and post-industrial recycling.

Learn more

Injection Molders Market Report & Ranking 2014

This special package contains our 132-page 2014 Market Report on the Injection Molding segment and our exclusive 2014 RANKINGS database of 500+ Injection Molders for a discounted package price.

Learn more

Upcoming Plastics News Events

January 14, 2015 - January 14, 2015Plastics in Automotive

February 4, 2015 - February 6, 2015Plastics News Executive Forum 2015

June 2, 2015 - June 3, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - Chicago 2015

September 16, 2015 - September 18, 2015Plastics Caps & Closures - September 2015

October 27, 2015 - October 29, 2015Plastics Financial Summit - New York - 2015

More Events