The New York Times is officially in favor of banning plastic bags. In an editorial posted on Dec. 2, the paper said "banning plastic bags would be a relatively effortless way to protect the environment, save energy and reduce a danger to wildlife as well as dogs and other pets."
Here's an excerpt from the column:
Here are some facts: Unlike paper bags, which can be easily recycled, relatively few plastic bags (about 7 percent) are ever used a second time. They last what seems an eternity, probably longer than most of the people using them. They put toxins in the soil, water and food chain. They are made of oil, something we should be saving rather than using when we do not need it. (It takes millions of barrels of oil to make the 100 billion plastic bags that Americans use in a year.)And, as you may have noticed, they fly and tumble with the wind — to bodies of water where they endanger fish and aquatic life and to low-lying shrubs, lawns and woodlands where they pose a real danger for wildlife and pets that get tangled up in them. Dogs have been known to choke on them.
This column goes a bit farther than a column the paper ran on Nov. 25, which supported a bill that would encourage recycling of plastic bags.
The Houston Chronicle, meantime, had a story on its Web site this weekend on how plastic bag makers including Superbag Corp. and the Progressive Bag Alliance trade group are fighting back against bag ban proposals -- and New York is a key battleground.
The plastic bag industry hopes that recycling programs, if passed in some major cities, could serve as models for the rest of the nation."We believe New York is the tipping point," said Isaac Bazbaz, whose family owns Superbag, a major plastic bag supplier to Wal-Mart that has its headquarters and factory in northwest Houston.
Bazbaz has spent more than $1 million to start the Progressive Bag Alliance, in part because he believes the industry has gotten a bad rap.
"We have been good corporate citizens," he said. "We just don't understand why no one has taken the time to hear our story."
This issue seems to surface somewhere new every week. It's interesting to see the PBA take a leading role in this debate.
















As managing editor of
Comments (5)
Rather than fight the ban on plastic bags Super Bags Corp. and the Progressive Bag Alliance should seize the opportunity to champion sustainable plastic bags made from post consumer recycled content or compostable films made from annually renewable resources. If you can't beat them join them. Who knows you might just profit while and enjoy the triple bottom line.
Posted by BJ Maloy | December 3, 2007 6:38 PM
Posted on December 3, 2007 18:38
Does the New York Times deliver their newspaper in plastic bags?
Posted by Tim Hanrahan | December 4, 2007 7:53 AM
Posted on December 4, 2007 07:53
The NY Times continues to slip into from its moorings. Never underestimate the NYT's capability for obtuseness. That they might actually care about my home state, NJ, is laughable. That they characterize everyone who objects to plastic bag bans with the pejorative "lobbyists" is intellectual and journalistic sloth. Likewise that they think any kind of recycling is "easy." My late stepfather was correct about NYT's superiority as fish-wrap.
Posted by Mark Sofman | December 4, 2007 9:31 AM
Posted on December 4, 2007 09:31
I'm scared. If the Times doesn't check the veracity of its sources, who will? The article undermined my faith in the media, which I have counted on to sprinkle a little truth over the mountains of baloney we see (and often want to see). Here's another example: the readership wants to see plastics bashed. Why? Why aren't we who are trained to believe what we see and not vice versa asking why the public is so primed to eat what this editorial is feeding us?
Posted by allan griff | December 4, 2007 5:25 PM
Posted on December 4, 2007 17:25
There they go again- thinking that paper is the
the answer.One would expect that newspapers made of paper would be ignorant to sustainability princibles. I'm sure the paper
industry keeps there customers well "oiled".
Doesn't anybody remember why the plastic bag
beat out paper to begin with? LOWER COST !
PLA plastic is not recyclable and is not the
answer.The public will not pay a premium for
paper or PLA plastic bags when the truth comes
out. Shame on the New York Times, once again
they mislead the public.
Posted by David A Frecka | December 5, 2007 11:04 AM
Posted on December 5, 2007 11:04