<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>PlasticsNews</title>
      <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:17:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Plastics and sports</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Here are a few sports-related items that caught my eye today.

First, <a href="http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/suttonnews/display.var.2257734.0.new_football_goals_in_sutton_are_more_than_just_hot_air.php">a story</a> from a news Web site in England about a team using inflatable soccer goalposts. The goals were used in a match between Hackbridge Primary School and the Stanley Park Juniors.

The PVC <a href="http://www.igoalusa.com/">iGoal</a> inflates on the spot, has a built-in net, and looks pretty much like the "real" thing. In addition to portability, there's a safety advantage, too. A <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/326.html">significant number</a> of injuries occur every year when kids hang on portable soccer goals.

I wonder how the ball rebounds off of the inflatable goals, especially in comparison to wood and metal posts and crossbars.

Now if they could only make a pitch that's pre-mowed and lined. No, wait, they do! But that brings me to the second sports-related link of the day. In the past few weeks, I've seen a number of stories questioning the safety of artificial turf. This story from <i>USA Today</i>, for example, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2008-05-07-artificial-turf-cover_N.htm">reported</a> that a half-dozen artificial fields in New York and New Jersey have been closed because of concern about high levels of lead in the turf fibers. Now the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is investigating.

<blockquote>The closed fields include four New Jersey surfaces &#8212; in Jersey City, Newark, Hoboken and at the College of New Jersey in Ewing &#8212; as well as a high school field in Cicero, N.Y., that were found to contain high levels of lead. Another closed high school field in Liverpool, N.Y. is being tested.

New Jersey health officials discovered the lead, used in pigment to color some fields, in the turf fibers. Kids and athletes could be exposed by inhaling or swallowing lead-laced turf fibers or "dust" kicked up by those playing on the fields, state epidemiologist Eddy Bresnitz says. 

There have been no known cases of illness attributed to the fields, but at least four of the closed fields will be torn up and replaced with new artificial surfaces.</blockquote>

Other fields around the United States are being tested, and California is looking into whether signs should be posted near artificial turf fields warning that users could be exposed to toxic chemicals.

Artificial turf manufacturers, meanwhile, say the product is safe. They held a news conference yesterday to <a href="http://www.astroturfusa.com/news/science.html">present findings</a> from an "expert panel" that concluded, in part, that lead does not leach from synthetic turf, and the "amount of ingested turf required to pose a threat is absurdly unrealistic."]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/plastics_and_sports.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/plastics_and_sports.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:17:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Get ready for the giant duck</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Minneapolis TV station KARE-11 has the intriguing headline "What's the deal with the big duck," along with a photo of a giant yellow "toy" duck in front of the Minnesota State Capitol. The story is about an effort to gain support for a bill that would ban phthates from some children's products.

<table><tr><td><img src="http://www.plasticsnews.com/pictures/0856123731_ducky.jpg" align="left" border="1" hspace="2" vspace="2"></td><td></table><font face="Arial" size="1">The Duck</font><p></p>

<blockquote>Senator Sandy Rummel, DFL - White Bear Lake, is the chief author of the bill in the senate. 

She said she was elected to protect people from harmful things and who better to protect than Minnesota's children.

"We need to remove risk and there should be no acceptable risk especially when it comes to children," said Sen. Rummel.

"We live in a chemical world and some of those chemicals are unsafe and we know that."</blockquote>

I imagine we'll see this duck at other State Capitols around the country in coming weeks. If we can get a copy of the duck's itinerary, we'll know what state legislatures will be looking at phthalate bans this summer.

I wonder if it's also available for birthday parties?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/get_ready_for_the_giant_duck.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/get_ready_for_the_giant_duck.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:36:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ground zero for bag bans</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The small village of Modbury, England, was the flash point for the latest trend of communities trying to ban plastic bags, and Rebecca Hosking was the spark. The <em>Washington Post'</em>s May 6 issue has an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/05/AR2008050502223.html">interview and feature</a> about her role in the issue.

<blockquote>Rebecca Hosking's moment, when a happy English farm girl cried tears that changed her life, came on a speck of sugar-white beach in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

"All you could smell was death," Hosking recalled, sitting snugly in a 600-year-old pub in her rainy home town, which has been transformed by her epiphany two years ago on Midway Atoll.

The beach on Midway, 1,300 miles northwest of Honolulu, was covered with thousands of dead albatrosses rotting in the tropical sun. In their split-open bellies, the BBC wildlife film producer said she saw the plastic that had killed them: cigarette lighters, pens, toys, pill bottles, knives and forks, golf balls and toothbrushes.</blockquote>

Powerful writing, and I'm sure other U.S. media will pick up this story, or decide to do their own interviews with Hosking. Get ready for another wave of anti-bag publicity.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/ground_zero_for_bag_bans.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/ground_zero_for_bag_bans.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:36:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Manufacturers cutting jobs</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The U.S. stock market is gaining ground today after the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/02/business/02econ-web.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin">Labor Department reported</a> that the U.S. economy lost "only" 20,000 jobs in April -- experts had been predicting the figure would be closer to 85,000.

The service sector added jobs, but manufacturers cut 46,000, and construction companies laid off 61,000.

This is good news? Apparently investors think so -- they're taking it as a sign that the "economic downturn is beginning to abate," according to the <i>New York Times</i> story.

Scott Paul, executive director for the <a href="http://www.americanmanufacturing.org/">Alliance for American Manufacturing</a> had this statement:

<blockquote>&#8220;We're in a jobs crisis.  America lost another 46,000 manufacturing jobs last month.  While Washington cheers the tax rebates, it continues to ignore the structural challenges that face manufacturing.  Unless Congress and the Administration hold China accountable for its cheating -- which is the single greatest factor contributing to manufacturing's woes -- and get serious about making American manufacturing more competitive, these job losses will grow every month.  The economy is top of mind for voters in Indiana, North Carolina, and all over America.  It's time for all three presidential candidates to offer a vision for jobs and manufacturing in the future -- and it's crucial for Congress and the Administration to act now.&#8221;</blockquote>

Do plastics processors agree that China is "the single greatest factor contributing to manufacturing's woes"? I think rising energy and commodity prices are a bigger problem than China right now.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/manufacturers_cutting_jobs.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/manufacturers_cutting_jobs.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:35:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bags against humanity?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A city councilman in Baltimore, Md., recently <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-1367182~Business_owners_blast_plan_for_bottle_deposit__plastic_bag_ban.html">equated using plastic bags with the Nazi holocaust,</a> and <i>The Baltimore Examiner</i> newspaper took him to task for the hyperbole in a <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-1369241~Bags_against_humanity.html">May 1 editorial</a>.

<blockquote>Having your heart in the right place is a nice quality. But it often makes for bad public policy, and in the case of Baltimore City Councilman <a href="http://www.baltimorecitycouncil.com/district1/default.htm">James Kraft, D-1</a>, the practice of putting his emotions first seems to have displaced his head. 

He equated using plastic bags with Nazi extermination tactics at a City Council meeting earlier this week.

&#8220;We don&rsquo;t want to be criticized by future generations for not doing enough now as were those who dealt with the Germans then,&#8221; Kraft said.

So what follows? Should those who use plastic bags be charged with murder? Genocide? </blockquote>

The editorial goes on to suggest that instead of trying to ban plastic bags, Kraft try less drastic measures to improve the environment, such as asking the city of Baltimore to stop buying bottled water, requiring city employees to pay for their own parking to encourage them to use public transportation, and doing more to encourage plastic bag recycling.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/bags_against_humanity.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/05/bags_against_humanity.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">recycling</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:16:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>BPA debate on the radio</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://wamu.org/programs/dr/08/04/29.php#19037">Diane Rehm radio show</a> today (Tuesday, April 29) features a discussion on the bisphenol A safety issue. The show, hosted by WAMU in Washington and nationally broadcast on many National Public Radio stations, is scheduled for 10 a.m. (if you miss it live, you can check the Web site for a recording and a transcript later today).

Scheduled guests are:

Steven Hentges, American Chemistry Council, PhD, Senior Director Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group

Frederick vom Saal, reproductive scientist and professor, Division of Biological Sciences, College of Arts & Science at the University of Missouri-Columbia

Warren Foster, director, center for reproductive care and reproductive biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

John Bucher, associate director, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Tony Clement, Health Minister, Canada.

Sounds like a heavyweight lineup.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bpa_debate_on_the_radio.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bpa_debate_on_the_radio.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:38:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bioplastics confuse consumers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The UK national daily newspaper <i>The Guardian</i> made a splash over the weekend with a story headlined: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/26/waste.pollution">'Sustainable' bio-plastic can damage the environment: Corn-based material emits climate change gas in landfill and adds to food crisis</a>.

<blockquote>Concern is mounting because the new generation of biodegradable plastics ends up on landfill sites, where they degrade without oxygen, releasing methane, a greenhouse gas 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. This week the US national oceanic and atmospheric administration reported a sharp increase in global methane emissions last year. 

"It is just not possible to capture all the methane from landfill sites," said Michael Warhurt, resources campaigner at Friends of the Earth. "A significant percentage leaks to the atmosphere."

"Just because it's biodegradable does not mean it's good. If it goes to landfill it breaks down to methane. Only a percentage is captured," said Peter Skelton of Wrap, the UK government-funded Waste and Resources Action Programme. "In theory bioplastics are good. But in practice there are lots of barriers."

Recycling companies said they would have to invest in expensive new equipment to extract bioplastic from waste for recycling. "If we could identify them the only option would be to landfill them," said one recycler who asked to remain anonymous. "They are not wanted by UK recycling companies or local authorities who refuse to handle them. Councils are saying they do not want plastics near food collection. If these biodegradable [products] get into the recycling stream they contaminate it.</blockquote>

Our sister publications in Europe, <i>Plastics & Rubber Weekly</i> and <i>European Plastics News</i>, noted today that <i>The Guardian</i>'s report didn't really break new ground.

"This and the other issues covered about bioplastics, recycling and oxy-degradables have all been covered over the past few years by <i>PRW</i> and <i>EPN</i>," online editor Katie Coyne <a href="http://www.prw.com/homePBP_NADetail_UP.aspx?ID_Site=818&ID_Article=24627&mode=1&curpage=0">wrote</a>. "These include concerns over contamination by bioplastic into oil-based plastics recycling streams."

So far coverage of bioplastics in the United States has been largely uncriticial. It will be interesting to see if the popular press here picks up on <i>The Guardian</i>'s lead.

(One notable exception came up on April 16, with <a href="http://www.telluridenews.com/homepage/x121157044">this curious story</a>, "Questioning how Biota sprung a leak," from the Telluride, Colo., <i>Daily Planet</i>, which quoted two former employees of a Colorado bottler who alleged that water containers blow molded by a now-defunct company company using corn-based plastic leaked on store shelves.)]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bioplastics_confuse_consumers.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bioplastics_confuse_consumers.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:17:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vinyl music coming back, sort of</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Don't throw away your old turntable. Vinyl records are making a mini-comeback, according to <a href="http://76.74.24.142/81128FFD-028F-282E-1CE5-FDBF16A46388.pdf">the latest data</a> from the Recording Industry Association of America.

In 2007, RIAA estimates that 1.3 million vinyl LPs and EPs were shipped in the United States. That's up for the first time since 2004, when shipments were at 1.36 million (in 2006 they fell to 900,000).

Recording artists like <a href="http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080419/LIFE/804190301/-1/NEWS">Elvis Costello</a> prefer vinyl for the superior sound -- and perhaps the harder-to-steal format has some appeal, too.

Wired music critic Eliot Van Buskirk noticed the trend back in October when he wrote <a href="http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/commentary/listeningpost/2007/10/listeningpost_1029">this column</a>, which explained the phenomena:

<blockquote>Golden-eared audiophiles have long testified to vinyl's warmer, richer sound. And now demand for vinyl is on the rise. Pressing plants that were already at capacity are staying there, while others are cranking out more records than they did last year in order to keep pace with demand. 

Don MacInnis, owner of Record Technology in Camarillo, California, predicts production will be up 25 percent over last year by the end of 2007. And he's not talking about small runs of dance music for DJs, but the whole gamut of music: "new albums, reissues, majors and indies ... jazz, blues, classical, pop and a lot of (classic) rock."</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/vinyl_music_coming_back_sort_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/vinyl_music_coming_back_sort_o.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:55:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Get ready for the Plastiki</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Men.style.com, the online home of <i>GQ</i> and <i>Details</i> magazines, has a <a href="http://men.style.com/fashion/trend_report/slideshow/h/022508BLUE?loop=0&slideshowId=slideshow47775&iphoto=25&nphoto=29&play=false">short blurb</a> and photograph today about a plastics-related environmental project that I had not seen before.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Mayer_de_Rothschild">David de Rothschild</a>, described as a "banking heir and <i>Global Warming Survival Handbook</i> author,", plans to set sail in December on an 8,000-mile journey from San Francisco to Australia, on a boat named <a href="http://www.exploration-architecture.com/section.php?xSec=37">The Plastiki</a>, made from post-consumer plastic bottles.

The trip will take him through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Garbage_Patch">Eastern Garbage Patch</a>, the area in the Pacific Ocean where floating plastic is said to vastly outnumber marine plankton.

It will be interesting to see what approach the Plastiki voyagers take to encouraging solutions to the marine debris problem.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/get_ready_for_the_plastiki.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/get_ready_for_the_plastiki.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">recycling</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A look at vom Saal&apos;s world</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Kansas City's <i>The Pitch</i> newspaper has a very interesting story about the bisphenol A controversy. <a href="http://www.pitch.com/2008-04-24/news/ever-since-university-of-missouri-biologist-frederick-vom-saal-and-his-team-learned-the-dangers-of-bisphenol-a-and-plastic-the-chemical-industry-has-been-trying-to-discredit-them/">The story</a> is told primarily from the perspective of University of Missouri Professor Frederick vom Saal and his team, although it includes reaction from a variety of industry sources.

Vom Saal is the researcher who managed to keep a spotlight on BPA safety for the past decade. It would not be an exaggeration to say that his efforts are responsible for the what <a href="http://www.plasticsnews.com/subscriber/printer.html?id=1208551154">we called</a> "the beginning of the end for polycarbonate bottles that contain bisphenol-A in North America" in our April 21 issue.

Here's an excerpt from <i>The Pitch</i>'s story:

<blockquote>Vom Saal is a controversial figure in his area of expertise &#8212; at least where the manufacturers of bisphenol A are concerned. His willingness to speak frankly about his findings is alarming to the top five makers of bisphenol A: Dow Chemical, Bayer Material Science, Sunoco Chemicals, SABIC Innovative Plastics and Hexion Specialty Chemicals. 

More than 6 billion pounds of bisphenol A are produced every year. 

"If I were to say to you, 'Oh, here's a pack of birth control pills. I'm going to extract out the hormone and make plastic out of them,' you'd think I was crazy," vom Saal says. "And indeed, the idea that you're using sex hormones to make plastic is just totally insane." 

For a decade, vom Saal has seen the chemical industry distort his research and government regulators ignore it. 

But after years of quietly publishing studies in scientific journals and presenting papers at toxicological conventions, vom Saal is starting to be heard. Since the first study of bisphenol A came out of vom Saal's lab in 1997, he has been interviewed about the chemical for PBS' <i>Frontline</i> series and by ABC's <i>20/20</i>. For Fox News, he has measured the amounts of bisphenol A that leach out of plastic baby bottles, and he has even been quoted in subculture-celebrating <i>Vice</i> magazine regarding the Texas-sized island of discarded plastic floating in a remote part of the Pacific Ocean. Recently, he has flown around the country to testify in front of state legislators writing measures against the use of bisphenol A. </blockquote>

The story details some serious allegations against the chemical industry. For example, it describes a 1997 meeting with Dow Chemical Co.'s John Waechter, who offered to replicate vom Saal's research in a larger, industry-funded study.

<blockquote>Vom Saal says he'll never forget Waechter's words: "Can we arrive at a mutually beneficial outcome where you withhold publishing this paper until authorized to do so by the Chemical Manufacturers Association?" 

The scientists felt they were being offered a bribe. 

Mark Walton, the lead spokesman for Dow Chemical, has been asked about Waechter's visit by media outlets before &#8212; Frontline, specifically. He tells <i>The Pitch</i> that what felt to the scientists like bribery was "simply an enormous misunderstanding between what Dr. Waechter attempted to communicate and what was heard by Dr. vom Saal. And there was no intent or effort in any way, shape or form to do anything that would cause Dr. vom Saal to do anything other than to publish science that was accurate." 

Vom Saal says that he told Waechter, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his offer. 

It was the MU scientists' first glimpse of industry backlash.</blockquote>

Some of the mistakes in the story jumped out as I read them. For example, trying to make a connection between vom Saal's research and the American Plastics Council's "Take another look at Plastic" ad campaign was a ridiculous stretch. And calling the Society of the Plastics Industry a subsidiary of American Chemistry Council is a sloppy mistake.

Still, this is an interesting story, worth reading for anyone involved in BPA- or polycarbonate-related issues.

Vom Saal seems destined to be an individual who will make a major impact on the future of the plastics industry. It's obvious from his comments that his interactions with industry people to date has not impressed him.

"Honesty in industry is not a requirement," vom Saal said. "As a matter of fact, the willingness to be dishonest seems to be the criterion for these people being hired and representing the chemical industry. We're playing on a very uneven playing field when we talk to them."]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/a_look_at_vom_saals_world.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/a_look_at_vom_saals_world.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Congratulations to Robert Cervenka</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Congratulations to Robert Cervenka, founder, chairman and CEO of injection molder <a href="http://www.phillipsplastics.com/">Phillips Plastics Corp.</a>, for being <a href="http://www.jawis.org/events_fame.html">inducted into the Wisconsin Business Hall of Fame</a> today.

This Milwaukee <i>Journal Sentinel</i> story describes Cervenka's success: "Cervenka <a href="http://www.phillipsplastics.com/corporateoverview/history.html">founded</a> the Phillips-based plastic molding company in 1964 with an initial investment of $52,000. Today, the company employs 1,600 people and tallied sales of more than $250 million in 2007."

He is joined by Don Davis, former chairman and chief executive of Milwaukee-based Rockwell Automation Inc., and the late Leonard Gentine, founder of Plymouth, Wis.-based Sargento Foods Inc.

The event benefits <a href="http://wisconsin.ja.org/">Junior Achievement of Wisconsin</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/congratulations_to_robert_cerv.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/congratulations_to_robert_cerv.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:31:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Two hot videos</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Here are a couple of fresh videos that folks in the plastics industry should watch today.

<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/24235752#24235752">The first</a> is from NBC's <i>Today</i> show, which yet again tackled the issue of BPA safety. This time Matt Lauer interviewed <a href="http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_acc/sec_leadership.asp?CID=351&DID=4429">Sharon Kneiss</a> of the American Chemistry Council and <a href="http://endocrinedisruptors.missouri.edu/vomsaal/vomsaal.html">Frederick vom Saal</a>, the University of Missouri professor who has taken a leading role in efforts to restrict BPA.

Watch the video and judge for yourself how they did. Neither is really a TV personality (but I'm not pretending that I could do better). They both had a lot to say and little time to make their points.

I don't think Kneiss helped her case near the end of the interview, where she tried to squeeze in some information that didn't really fit in with the topic.

"Let's look at the benefits that BPA-containing products afford. ... Safety in bicycle helmets, children's seats for the back of your car. There are a lot of good, important benefits that BPA affords," Kneiss said.

Yes, that's true -- but this debate is about the safety of polycarbonate water and baby bottles, not durable goods.

Perhaps this will be <i>Today</i>'s final word on BPA. I wonder how much typical viewers have been paying attention, and what impression they've come away with of BPA, polycarbonate, and plastics packaging in general.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/SocietyofPlasticsInd">The second video</a> is from the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc., and the topic is related (although it doesn't directly come out and say so).  The video is narrated by Bill Carteaux, SPI's president and chief executive officer, and it explains the "chasing arrows" resin identification symbols on plastic containers.

SPI released the video "to clarify the intended purpose of the resin identification codes."

"The resin codes do not signify whether or not our local towns will recycle those containers. They do not indicate the safe or intended use of a bottle or container, and they should not be used for that purpose," Carteaux says. "Furthermore, the resin codes do not provide guidance on the safe or intended use of a product inside the container."

He also clarifies that the No. 7 recycling code applies to all non-PET, HDPE, LDPE, PVC, PS and PP containers -- not just polycarbonate, as many recent news reports have implied.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/two_hot_videos.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/two_hot_videos.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:22:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bag makers win injunction against ban</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Plastic bag makers were granted an injunction on Thursday putting a halt to a proposed ban on bags in Oakland, Calif., according to <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/18/BAJD107MDG.DTL">this story</a> from the <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>.

"We feel vindicated," Michael Mills, attorney for the Coalition to Support Plastic Bag Recycling, told the newspaper.

The next step? The city will decide whether to challenge the ruling, to drop the ban, or whether to go ahead with an environmental impact study of the proposal.

Watch <em>Plastics News' </em><a href="http://www.plasticsnews.com/subscriber/headlines.phtml">Web site</a> for more information on the ruling, and reaction from all sides, later in the week.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bag_makers_win_injunction_agai.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/bag_makers_win_injunction_agai.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:56:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Paper bags: Roach city</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Jeff Stier, associate director of the <a href="http://www.acsh.org/">American Council on Science and Health</a>, has <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/04162008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/paper_bags__roach_city_106774.htm">an amusing op-ed column</a> in the <i>New York Post</i> about an unexpected consequence of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/business/23bags.html?_r=1&em&ex=1201237200&en=3fd060412e8f941d&ei=5070&oref=slogin">Whole Foods Market dropping plastic bags</a>: Cockroaches prefer paper bags, which Stier said would contribute to the city's "asthma epidemic."

<blockquote>Entymologists, including Coby Schal of North Carolina State University, have observed that cockroaches prefer paper to plastic. "They really like to live in the creases found in paper bags," said Schal, the nation's top expert on cockroaches. Many cockroach species chew into paper bags to lay their eggs - something they don't do with plastic.

This is a problem beyond just the yuck factor. Darryl Zeldin, a senior scientist with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, says: "Cockroaches significantly increase asthma symptoms in allergic individuals. And while a third of inner-city residents are cockroach-sensitive, sensitivity to cockroach exposure is widespread in our nation - not just in the inner cities."

If Whole Foods' "green" move starts a trend among food stores, it may contribute to New York's asthma epidemic.

It gets worse. The move flies in the face of the enviro mantra to "reduce, reuse and recycle" - in that order. Almost everyone keeps a stash of plastic bags. We reuse them to line garbage cans, bring lunch to work and clean up after the dog - try doing that with paper. Plastic bags are easier to reuse and more efficient to recycle than paper. In fact, starting this summer, New York City will require large stores to offer shoppers recycling bins. (Maybe the city's overbearing emphasis on public health resulted in something positive, this time.)

That makes a lot more environmental sense than San Francisco's governmental greenwash: an outright plastic-bag ban. If you are worried about the environment, reusing plastic bags is a better choice than paper bags, which rarely get reused.</blockquote>

Stier goes on to say that too many people "mindlessly follow green initiatives and bask in how good it feels -- without recognizing the unintended consequences." He gave the example of the Penn and Teller <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi3erdgVVTw">video</a> in which hundreds of people sign a petition to ban water -- they call it dihydrogen monoxide -- because it is a "chemical found in reservoirs and lakes" and used in pesticides and nuclear energy that is finding its way into grocery stores and baby food.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/paper_bags_roach_city.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/paper_bags_roach_city.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">materials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">packaging</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:02:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>ACC battles back</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_acc/sec_newsroom.asp?CID=151&DID=194">American Chemistry Council</a> is <a href="http://www.pr-inside.com/acc-addresses-recent-concerns-about-the-r542276.htm">planning a conference call with journalists</a> on Thursday to address "Recent media reports have raised unfounded issues and concerns about the safety of plastic bottles."

<blockquote>Specifically, on April 9 and 10 the Today Show aired a "consumer alert" story about the alleged dangers of plastics, plastic bottles and, in particular, Bisphenol-A, which is used to make polycarbonate containers. The reports were full of inaccuracies which have unnecessarily alarmed the public. In addition, Health Canada is expected to soon release a draft risk assessment about Bisphenol-A which may further confuse and unnecessarily alarm the public. Also this week the National Toxicology Program's (NTP) Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction released a draft report providing reassurance that consumers can continue to use products made from bisphenol A. Importantly, this conclusion has been affirmed by scientific and government bodies worldwide.</blockquote>

It will be interesting to see how many reporters participate in the call, and (assuming ACC takes questions), what sort of comments they'll get.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/acc_battles_back.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.plasticsnews.com/blog/2008/04/acc_battles_back.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:17:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
