As editor of Plastics News, I scan scores of Web sites, emails and news releases daily, and stay in constant touch with our network of global staff reporters and correspondents -- the largest reporting team in the plastics industry. I distill the more interesting items into commentary for this blog. Plastics News, part of Crain Communications Inc., began publishing weekly news in 1989, and launched a bilingual China site in mid-2005. In 2007, Crain acquired the two leading English-language plastics publications in Europe - Plastics & Rubber Weekly and the monthly European Plastics News.
How often do you see polyurethane foam as the cover story in a business weekly like Barron's?
Today's issue has the story -- although the subject matter may seem more appropriate for Cosmopolitan!
The story, "Sex or Sleep?", looks at PU's growing stake in the mattress market, and what it means to activity in the American bedroom.
OK, I'll spell it out: "They induce a blissful snooze but make sex a challenge."
Sadly, polyurethane never gets mention in Miriam Gottfried's cover story. The story calls it by the generic name "memory foam," described as a "dense material that softens in reaction to body heat" that dates back to NASA research in 1966.
Memory foam has shaken up the sleepy mattress industry, accounting for almost 20 percent of the market, Barron's reported.
Check the link for the salacious details. Don't worry, it's all in good taste -- despite Rupert Murdoch's role, Barron's is still a Dow Jones flagship.
Plastics News featured the one-cup coffee maker trend a few weeks ago, highlighting the rapid growth in the segment -- and how plastics were benefitting.
The New York Times' Dealbook reported this week that Green Mountain founder Robert P. Stiller resigned his position as chairman on May 8 after he sold 5 million shares of the company's stock -- worth about $125 million -- to pay off loans he had taken against the shares.
Stiller, who is still on the company's board, now owns only about 5.4 percent of Green Mountain, down from 27.5 percent in early 2008, according to the report.
Indepedent shareholders took a bath as a result of Stiller's margin call too -- the value of Green Mountain stock lost about half their value in the past few weeks.
Report links flame retardants and tobacco industry
The Chicago Tribune is in the middle of publishing an investigative series on the safety and effectiveness of chemical flame retardants -- which are used widely in plastic foam upholstery.
The first two stories in the series, "Playing with fire," charge that the chemical industry misled consumers and legislators in order to require widespread use of flame retardants.
A primary player in the debate, according to the story, was Peter Sparber, a former Tobacco Institute executive who helped create and steer the National Association of State Fire Marshals.
The meat for the report came from tobacco industry documents that became public after cigarette companies settled lawsuits over the health costs of treating smokers, according to the Tribune.
Watch for the next two installments in the series on Wednesday and Thursday.
A controversial pro-plastics section has been removed from a proposed environmental curriculum in California, according to a report by California Watch.
Last year California Watch had reported that Gerald Lieberman, a private consultant hired by California school officials, added a new section to the 11th-grade teachers' edition textbook called "The Advantages of Plastic Shopping Bags," with the title and some of the textbook language inserted almost verbatim from letters written by the American Chemistry Council.
In the wake of that disclosure, the state Environmental Protection Agency took another look at the proposed curriculum, which is part of a statewide K-12 curriculum on the environment.
In a follow-up story posted last week, Suzanne Rust of California Watch reported that the curriculum has been rewritten.
The lesson (PDF) "no longer includes a section titled, 'The Advantages of Plastic Shopping Bags,' and it incorporates more recent and relevant recycling statistics," she wrote.
The story quotes Bryan Ehlers, Cal/EPA's assistant secretary for education and quality programs, who said: "We went back and looked at the whole unit and really picked through it with a fine-tooth comb."
"Our concern always with the curriculum was to ensure integrity and accuracy," Ehlers said.
In "Advantages of Plastic Shopping Bags" workbook section had asked students to list some advantages of plastic bags. The correct answer, according to the teachers' edition, was: "Plastic shopping bags are very convenient to use. They take less energy to manufacture than paper bags, cost less to transport and can be reused."
CNN's Jane Velez-Mitchell covered the debate over sustainability of PET water bottles yesterday, and while the report is worth a look, it also has some serious problems.
With a "Ban the Bottle" graphic looming in the background, Velez-Mitchell tells viewers that she has an ally -- none other than 84-year-old Jean Hill, who led the effort to ban single-serve PET water bottles in Concord, Mass. (See PN's April 26 story, "Concord, Mass., voters pass ban on PET water bottles ")
I enjoyed hearing what Hill has to say -- it's the first time I've seen her on camera. Her message is that the bottle ban in Concord is a big deal, and the media's coverage has been shallow.
She's absolutely right about that.
Velez-Mitchell is a little over-the-top, literally applauding Hill and saying "Thank you for leading the crusade against plastic bottles." But that's her opinion, so it's OK.
But then the story stumbles by using some discredited information.
Velez-Mitchell describes the garbage patch as "a giant mound of garbage ... bigger than Texas in the Pacific Ocean." That's hyperbole that's been discredited by ocean researchers.
She also cites a website (thinkoutsidethebin.com) that says plastic debris kills 100,000 marine animals a year. Remember that one? I wrote last year about how Harold Johnson, a Saco, Maine, journalist and author of "The Flotsam Diaries" blog, researched and discredited the oft-cited number.
Note to CNN: Interesting story, but don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Plastics found deeper into ocean, driving up trash estimates
The plastic debris problem in the ocean could be worse than some studies have estimated, according to a new report.
University of Washington oceanographer Giora Proskurowski and Tobias Kukulka of the University of Delaware say they found that high winds push lightweight plastic particles deep below the ocean surface -- deeper than previous studies had realized.
That meant decades of research on plastic marine debris may in some cases vastly underestimate the true amount of plastic debris in the oceans, Proskurowski said in a news release from UW.
Proskurowski's data came from a 2010 North Atlantic expedition, where he and his team collected samples at the surface, plus an additional three or four depths down as far as 100 feet.
"Almost every tow we did contained plastic regardless of the depth," he said.
Proskurowski said more research is needed, because at this point oceanographers just don't have a good handle on how much plastic is in the ocean.
He added: "On this topic, what science needs to be geared toward is building confidence that scientists have solid numbers and that policy makers aren't making judgments based on CNN reports."
Here are some short takes on plastics headlines from the past week:
"Lego gets snapped at over girls' line of toys," from the San Francisco Chronicle's SFGate.com. According to the story, "a pair of feminist activists" is unhappy with the new Lego Friends line of toys designed for girls.
Characters in the Lego Friends line include Mia, an athlete; Olivia, an inventor; Stephanie, an animal lover; Emma, who enjoys fashion; and Andrea, who likes to sing and dance.
The activists, Stephanie Cole and Bailey Shoemaker-Richards, started a petition on Change.org protesting Lego's marketing strategy.
And more than 55,000 people have signed the petition.
The story notes that according to Clean Ocean Action, 7,500 people participated in 2011 Beach Sweeps on the New Jersey Shore, and they collected 452,698 pieces of marine debris that had washed up in 65 locations.
Some 83 percent of the total was plastic.
There was some good news -- for the first time in 19 years, cigarette debris (filters, packaging, lighters and cigar tips) were not in the top three pollutants.
So perhaps there's hope after all for changing consumer behavior.
Thanks to all the volunteers who participated in the Beach Sweeps. Were there any Plastics Blog readers in the clean-up crews?
It's not surprising that the auto industry is taking the looming shortage of nylon 12 resin seriously.
Remember, this industry has first-hand experience with what a fractured supply chain can do to OEMs and suppliers alike, following natural disasters in Japan (earthquake and tsunami) and Thailand (flooding) last year.
I've been watching coverage of the nylon 12 situation -- triggered by a March 31 explosion and fire at an Evonik Industries AG plant in Marl, Germany. So far the best story came from David Vink, who wrote "Evonik warns customers about nylon 12 supply constraints," which Plastics News posted on April 15.
If you want to bring yourself up to speed on cyclododecatriene feedstocks, nylon 12, competitors to Evonik, potential replacement materials, plans to rebuild the Marl factory and the supply-demand picture prior to the explosion, you should start with Vink's story.
To help fill in the blanks with information since that report, here are some important additions:
Paul Blanchard from IHS Chemical noted that Evonik and Arkema SA -- which buys cyclododecatriene from Evonik -- together account for about half the world's supply of nylon 12. So if it wasn't clear before, that number should drive home the point that this isn't just a problem for Evonik.
Despite that, Dustin Walsh, a staff reporter for Crain's Detroit Business, noted today that automakers have not announced any planned shutdowns or cutting forecasts as a result of the anticipated shortage.
Walsh wrote in his "Shifting Gears" blog: "Mike Goss, general manager of external affairs for Farmington Hills-based Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc., said in an emailed statement: 'The material provided by Evonik is in our North American supply chain, but until we complete an assessment with our suppliers, the impact is unknown. At this time, there is no need to adjust production, and we will continue to work closely with our suppliers to ensure ongoing production.'"
Walsh also wrote that hundreds of auto industry executives are meeting in Troy, Mich., this afternoon to discuss the situation. Their goals:
Help the industry understand and quantify the current state of global nylon 12 inventories and production capacities.
Collaboratively brainstorm options to strategically extend current nylon 12 capacities and/or identify alternative materials or designs to offset projected capacity shortfalls.
Identify/recruit the necessary industry resources required to technically vet, test and approve such options.
We'll continue to stay on top of this story, so watch PlasticsNews.com for updates.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has put a lot of muscle behind its sustainability campaign -- global plastics companies are well aware of the company's supplier scorecards.
There's only one mention of plastics in the report, and it's not critical. Wal-Mart's plastics recycling record is held up as an example of a project that the company wants environmentalists -- and the public -- to notice:
Walmart's sustainability campaign is not your typical corporate greenwash. It is more complex and clever than that. It has enough substance mixed in with the spin to draw you in. It's easy to get swept up in the big numbers Walmart can roll out -- like the 30 tons of plastic hangers it recycles every month -- and to be charmed by the very fact of this giant company, with its hard-nosed corporate culture, using a word like 'sustainability.'
More than a few environmentalists have been won over. With their endorsements and the flood of positive press that seems to follow each of Walmart's green announcements, the company has managed to turn around flagging poll numbers, shift its labor practices out of the limelight, and, most crucially, crank up its expansion machine.
ILSR takes the company to task for failing to take action on climate change, and falling fall short of a goal set seven years ago to use more renewable energy.
Some more materials-related items, potentially of interest to Plastics Blog readers:
The report criticizes Wal-Mart's sale of shoddy products, like $6.24 toasters and clothing that doesn't last.
It question's the company's Green Product Rankings, an "ambitious project" that "doesn't have much to show for itself."
The report says:
In the first year or two after its founding in July 2009, the Sustainability Consortium was closelipped about its progress. In the last few months, the consortium has finally said that it is not in fact developing a rating system or even product-specific information. It is assembling general lifecycle data for types of products - a typical environmental footprint for orange juice or detergent, say, but not for specific brands within those categories.
Spokesperson Jon Nicol says this data could be a starting point for a rating system should a company wish to develop one. So far, the consortium has finished just 10 assessments.23 A Walmart supercenter carries roughly 140,000 items across thousands of product types.
Was Walmart woefully naive about what it would take to create the kind of Sustainability Index it promised? Was it a miscalculation to have corporations play a big role in developing environmental standards for their own products? Should Walmart have put its efforts instead into refining and adapting an existing rating system, one not controlled by industry, such as GoodGuide? Was the index just a PR ploy from the start?
The auto industry is getting serious about using plastic composites to reduce weight and improve fuel economy.
Every week, it seems, we're seeing stories about automakers and suppliers using or studying ways to use plastics and/or composites to make vehicles lighter.
The project is part of Ford's goal of cutting average vehicle weight by 750 pounds.
For some additional insight into this issue, check out this video from our sister publication Automotive News. It features Plastics News' own auto industry beat reporter Rhoda Miel.
For some additional context, check out these stories on automotive weight savings, all in the past three weeks:
When I attended Plastics News' last "Plastics in Lightweight & Electric Vehicles" conference, I was impressed with what the plastics industry people were saying about the potential weight savings they could bring to the table.
But at the time, I got the feeling that many automakers felt they could hit aggressive fuel economy goals through other means, like powertrain improvements, and slightly cutting the size of vehicles.
Now it's beginning to look like automakers are more serious about the potential of plastics and composites.
Is that the result of federal MPG mandates, or consumers who are starting to believe that they're never again going to see $2 per gallon gasoline?
A funny thing happened on the way to Orlando airport. At 6:30 am today, on the day after the NPE2012 show wrapped up at the Orange County Convention Center, Plastics News' Robert Grace piled into a metered taxi at the Rosen Centre Hotel.
Here's his first-hand report:
The first thing the driver said to me was how happy he was that our show, meaning NPE, had taken place here this week. "This city really needed it." He said it was the biggest show ever at the OCCC, and that he'd never seen anything like it. He met a lot of nice people this week, he continued.
I started to explain how that this was the first time for NPE in Orlando, and that previously it had been held ... "in Chicago", he said, finishing my sentence. He knew the back story about the NPE show! Go figure.
My driver was a Haitian-born resident of Orlando for the past 20 years. About a year ago a lack of work caused him to be laid off from his construction job, where he had helped to build some of the longest bridges in Florida and Mississippi. He had been driving a cab for only 10 months, but he likes it. He meets interesting people.
I shared with him some of the background about why the show moved from McCormick Place, saying how many exhibitors were really fed up with the strict union rules that made logistics expensive and frustrating. He was incredulous, and said "that won't happen here."
He thanked me for being here, flashing a gold-toothed smile, and said that NPE had "helped put food on the table for a lot of families." I gave him a healthy tip and he appreciatively said he was really looking forward to NPE returning to his home town in three years.
Unbelievable. But it was symbolic of the sort of warm reception that many show attendees experienced throughout the week at NPE. It's nice to feel wanted, and to be respected. And that bodes well for all of us in 2015.
Jean Hill, the 84-year-old Concord, Mass., grandmother of six, is at it again -- trying to ban sales of single-serve plastic water bottles.
According to the Boston Herald, Concord residents will vote at an April 25 town meeting on a bylaw that would ban sales of bottled water in sizes of one liter or less, except in an emergency.
Concord is a historic town -- site of the first battle of the Revolutionary War. If the bylaw passes, it apparently would be the first of its kind in the United States.
This isn't Hill's first attempt to ban single-serve water bottles. Last year the town narrowly defeated her measure, by a 272-265 vote.
"I'm coming back next year. I'm 83 and I'm tough. I don't give up," Hill said at the time.
While local retailers are worried that they'll lose business to competitors in nearby towns, Hill says they have nothing to worry about.
"If the ban did pass -- and I'm quite optimistic that it will -- I believe that any loss of revenue would be ... more than made up if they sell Thermos bottles, refillable bottles," she told the Herald.
I'm not a big user of single-serve water bottles. I prefer tap water, at home and at work. And I acknowledge that the recycling rate for these containers is way too low -- Plastics News has editorially supported bottle deposit legislation for years.
That said, I think there's something wrong with allowing voters to decide which legal, safe and convenient products stores can sell.
If Hill wants to discourage residents from buying single-serve bottled water, I've got no problem with that. But making it illegal doesn't mesh with the concepts of freedom and liberty that are synonymous with the name Concord.
Add actress Kyra Sedgwick to the list of celebrities who are crusading against single-use plastics.
Last week Sedgwick, star of TV's "The Closer," moderated ""A Global Call to End Plastic Pollution" at the United Nations in New York.
Lisa Kaas Boyle, an environmental attorney, co-founder of the Plastic Pollution Coalition and a board chair at Heal the Bay, posted a blog item about the talk over the weekend on The Huffington Post.
"When I became aware that plastic trash like the disposable plastic water bottle would survive not only my lifetime but my children's and their children's lifetimes, I knew that we, as a society, had a major problem. When I learned that in developed countries like the U.S., we recycle at best around 30 percent of the plastic we use and that even then, we turn the plastic into relatively useless items like plastic ashtrays, I became obsessed with the waste. I can be thrown into a severe anxiety attack at my neighborhood spinning class as I see mothers whom I know to be intelligent responsible parents go through a jumbo size water and then throw it 'away.'
There is no 'away,' and much of the plastic packaging we use could end up in one of the five Gyres -- swirling areas of the world's ocean current where trash is concentrated. Plastic pollution kills and injures wildlife. Tiny plastic pellets in the water absorb toxins, and studies are now being done to learn whether it is poisoning fish, which is globally the most important source of protein for humans.
I have done my best to alter my lifestyle to help solve this problem; avoiding plastic whenever possible and spread the word about its damaging effects. But I can only do so much. This is where the government must step in. There is a real solution that can be implemented now.
What will new crackers mean to plastics processors?
Increasing availability of natural gas in North America has the potential to make a big difference in the plastics industry in the next decade. But how exactly will it change?
North American processors may be salivating over the prospects for plentiful, inexpensive polyethylene. But will that perception of shale feedstocks become reality?
Speakers at the IHS World Petrochemical Conference in Houston touched on the topic this week, and Alex Tullo, senior editor for Chemical & Engineering News, wrote about it in his "The Chemical Notebook" blog.
The post, "Petrochemicals, Front And Center," notes that "petrochemical executives may be exuberant about the prospects of feedstocks from shale, but they are also realistic."
Plastics News has reported on expansion plans related to shale gas from Formosa Plastics Corp. USA, Nova Chemicals Corp., Chevron Phillips, Dow Chemical Co., Shell Oil Co. and Westlake Chemical Corp.
But announced projects don't always get built. That's typical in the boom-and-bust cycle of the chemical industry.
Tullo quotes two executives at the conference who say that not all of the crackers that are currently on the drawing board will get built -- at least not on their current schedule. That makes sense.
The location of some of the new capacity also has the potential to change the North American plastics industry. Shell Chemicals, for example, is looking at Monaca, Pa., for its new capacity.
Tullo cites comments on the topic by Ben van Beurden, executive vice president of Shell Chemicals Ltd. Tullo writes that there is "a big advantage being close to the converters -- customers would enjoy quicker delivery and less working capital tied up in inventory."
That seems likely. I asked Frank Esposito, Plastics News' senior reporter who covers materials suppliers, and he pointed out that there is a large number of packaging and rotational molding firms in the Midwest that could benefit from lower PE shipping costs from western Pennsylvania, compared to current suppliers in the U.S. Gulf Coast.
And even if new capacity doesn't necessarily result in lower resin prices, Esposito said the new North American PE capacity would mean more reliability of supply.
Consider the short-term impact on pricing of Gulf Coast hurricanes, for example -- wouldn't new capacity in the Midwest temper those fluctuations?
I expect to hear more comments from the materials sector on shale feedstocks next week at NPE2012 in Orlando, Fla. Probably not any new capacity announcements, but certainly more talk about what the future holds for plastics processors.
Take this as a sign of Orlando, Fla.'s interest in the plastics industry -- specifically NPE.
The Orlando Sentinel posted a story last night about NPE2012, saying North America's largest plastics show "could become the next undisputed heavyweight champion of the region's convention industry."
Sara K. Clarke's story, "Orlando faces test with huge plastics trade show," looks at the latest numbers and makes the case that NPE2012 could "initiate Orlando into the ranks of those very few travel destinations capable of handling even the largest industrial trade shows."
"Other manufacturing, other heavy-equipment trade shows will see the success of [NPE] and, I believe, based on that success, Orlando will be in a stronger position to compete for that business for years ahead," Gary Sain, president and CEO of Visit Orlando, the local convention-and-visitors bureau, told the Sentinel.
The story does a nice job of framing what NPE means to Orlando -- and what the new location potentially means to the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc., the show's owner.
"Part of the challenge will be convincing the trade group that the show will continue to draw the industry's Midwest-based crowd despite the added travel distance to Orlando, compared with Chicago," Clarke wrote.
SPI is counting on Orlando to help draw an international crowd -- but she's absolutely right about the importance of keeping the tried and true Midwest attendees, too.
The story quotes Gene Sanders, SPI's senior vice president of trade shows and conferences, saying that this year's show registration may approach 60,000. If so, that certainly would be a sign that the new show location is a hit.
There are a few paragraphs at the end of the story that may give readers pause.
The story notes that SPI "hasn't signed a contract for its 2015 show," but "wouldn't object if Orlando became the event's new long-term home."
"We hope that the show just knocks it out of the park and we'll be back there in '15 and '18 and '21," Sanders said. "That's our goal."
When I first read that, I thought it was odd that SPI has not signed a contract for 2015. SPI has been saying for three years that both the 2012 and 2015 shows will be in Orlando.
But it would go too far to assume that means SPI will be looking for a new home for NPE in three years.
In fact, I've been assured by SPI that nothing has changed -- the group still plans to hold the 2015 show in Orlando. The final agreement just hasn't been signed yet.
So Orlando can feel free to "knock it out of the park," as Sanders put it, without worrying to much about being pulled from the lineup in 2015.
As far as 2018 and 2021 are concerned ... well, it's a little to soon to worry about that!
Who's Emily Utter? She's an anti-plastics activist who helped pass a ban on plastic bags in San Francisco, and now she's working to help other cities and towns do the same.
Utter is making "huge progress ... in spite of the plastic and chemical industries millions of dollars and best efforts," according to a Q&A interview with her that's making the rounds in environmental blogs.
The interview has a David vs. Goliath tone, which is understandable given the subject matter.
To help balance that, I'll mention here that the U.S. plastics industry traditionally doesn't rank all that high on lists of most influential trade groups.
Also, let's assume that the plastics industry is correct -- how would you expect it to respond to numerous efforts across the country to ban or tax legal products? It's one thing to urge consumers to use less plastic, and quite another to make them illegal.
Here are a few snippets from the interview:
How would I go about getting a plastic bag ban in my town?
If it is just an individual that wants to get involved I always recommend people look for other groups in their area that are either interested in doing it or are currently doing something about the plastic bag problem - a Sierra Club Chapter, a Surfrider chapter or an environmental club are good places to start. Once people do the research they often find there are already groups in their area working on the plastic bag issue.
Then, once a group has formed they should check out the city council to determine the environmental leader within the council that would sponsor plastic bag ban or fee legislation and set up a meeting to see if the council person identified is interested in sponsoring legislation.
Are there are general challenges that everyone is facing regardless of town size or structure in passing plastic bag legislation?
The plastic industry. They are extremely well funded and they will send their representatives all over the country to fight the legislation.
How are people overcoming the challenges the plastic industry is creating?
Perseverance. We see the impact of plastic on our health and on our environment. There is a lot passion and understanding about this issue now. We see the plastic bags in our neighborhoods, in our parks and on our beaches. People know there are practical and easy ways to take care of this problem. We have seen this in Europe for years and now the US is finally starting to catch up. With all of the global examples, we are also seeing global momentum for this issue. It gives us the mental support to keep at it. It is not like we are proposing something totally out of the blue. Everything we are proposing is practical and it has a really obvious impact that we can see immediately.
It seems like the plastic industry would be kind of scary, especially to little towns.
I think for some of the smaller towns the plastics industry just kind of says, 'We are not going to bother.' They are focused on bigger targets and being strategic about it. Everyone looks to California for environmental legislation and the plastic industry is really trying to battle us here. Given the focus on suing California cities, some of the non-Californian cities have had an easier time because all of the plastic industry resources are going to California. I think if Denver brought the plastic bag issue up again you would see the plastic industry bringing in the big guns again. I know Chicago is starting to work on legislation and we will see the plastic industry come out in force. This is also why the plastic industry shows up to the smaller towns outside of Chicago because they see when a smaller town outside of a bigger city does it it spurs other cities around them to do it.
Reshoring and 'buying American' -- Is it a trend yet?
Anecdotal evidence continues to pile up that some manufacturers are "reshoring" -- bringing work back to North America.
The story is becoming familiar. Companies say the advantages of bringing work back from places like China are the shorter supply chain, reduced lead time and stable pricing. With prices rising in China, and North American manufacturers becoming lean and more efficient, the cost difference that started the offshoring trend in the first place isn't as significant.
In the past few days, Plastics News has covered Whirlpool Corp.'s KitchenAid brand is bringing production of its hand mixers back to the U.S. from China, and Readfield, Maine-based Saunders Manufacturing Co. Inc. relocating some plastics work from China to LC Industries in Jackson, Miss.
In the KitchenAid story, staff reporter Rhoda Miel writes from the International Home + Housewares Show that the company is in the process of moving production now to Greenville, Ohio, which is already home to KitchenAid's larger stand mixers.
That shift will mean new business for suppliers of the mixers injection molded parts, said Larry Simpson, global business development manager for KitchenAid Small Appliances. Among other parts, the mixers' bodies are injection molded plastic, some of them painted and some using a molded-in-color process.
In the Saunders story, PN intern Brandi Shaffer writes that Saunders President and CEO John Rosmarin said the company is "committed to produce as many of our products as possible here in the U.S.A."
The company started a "Made in USA" product line in 2008.
And speaking of "Made in USA," here's a story for readers who want to jump into the trend with both feet.
"Except for the granite countertop, the microwave oven and the recessed lighting, everything will be made in America, down to the nails," writes Janet Miller from AnnArbor.com.
For all the consumers who claim they can't find American-made products, this should be an eye-opener.
In keeping with my "countdown to NPE" theme, I spotted an item today with good tips for exhibitors at any trade show.
The source is Mike Thimmesch, director of industry relations for Skyline Exhibits, who wrote "18 Hidden Rules of Trade Shows" for Trade Show News Network.
Some of my favorites:
The larger the crowd of people already in your booth, the more other people will want to visit your booth.
The person who complains the most about the value of trade shows is usually the one who knows (and tries) the least.
The more fun trade show attendees have in your booth during the show, the more serious business you will do after the show.
The more years you exhibit at the same show, the more you will have repeat customers visit you in your booth.
The faster you follow up your trade show leads, the greater the sales you will generate from that show.
Seems like common sense, right? But why do so many exhibitors ignore these tips?
I know a lot of marketing specialists read the Plastics Blog. Please share your thoughts about Thimmesch's tips, and offer a few of your own.
On top of the rest of the plastics industry's marine litter problems, get ready for a new twist. Experts say debris from last year's tsunami that devastated parts of Japan are headed for the West Coast of the United States and Canada.
The experts say the debris will hit North American beaches later this year or in early 2013.
And given the nature of marine trash, the most visible products are going to be plastic.
I've heard people argue that marine litter is an education problem, not a plastics problems. But this tsunami debris is pretty clear proof that the issue isn't quite so black and white.
We're not talking about people intentionally failing to dispose of or recycle their plastic trash -- this was unavoidable.
Unless the industry gets out in front of this issue, it's got the potential to be a black eye.
Ford Asia official to keynote PN's China conference
Attendees to the China Plastics in Automotive 2012 conference in Shanghai on April 17 will gain insights into Ford Motor Co.'s vision for creating greener, more lightweight and fuel-efficient vehicles globally when they hear from keynote speaker Jennifer Gilhool.
She's Ford Asia Pacific & Africa's Shanghai-based director of sustainability, environment and safety engineering.
Gilhool has a law degree from the University of Michigan. she started in Ford's legal department, then moved to the regulatory side of the business, working on safety and compliance matters.
Other topics to be covered at the conference include vehicle design trends, and the role plastics and advanced polymer composites will play in interiors, seating, powertrain and under-the-hood components, as well as in electrification and hybrid technology.
The bilingual event is being organized by Plastics News at the Kerry Hotel on the day before the huge Chinaplas 2012 trade show. See full event details at www.pnchina.com/cpa2012.
A few months ago I wrote about the potential for viewers to take away an anti-plastics message from "The Lorax," a Dr. Seuss-inspired film that opened today.
Upon further review, I think the American Chemistry Council's response is more on target.
ACC knew the film was coming, so it prepared a website designed to capture kids' enthusiasm for the film and its central message around making a difference.
ACC's "Plastics and the Lorax" isn't about fighting back against anti-plastics stereotypes (you may recall that the film's protaganist lives in "Thneedville," a town made of plastic).
Instead, ACC is focused on how kids can help recycle more plastic. The site educates visitors about what plastics can be recycled and how they are used.
ACC's Jennifer Killinger, the senior director of sustainability and public outreach, says the site went live yesterday. ACC is taking a low-key approach to the film -- after all, the audience is children.
The intent of the site is to promote recycling and give them simple tips to get more plastics in the bin.\
But ACC's not picking a fight with Dr. Suess -- which seems like the right approach.
Have you noticed any of the new package recycling labels?
Some manufacturers are voluntarily using the labels in an effort to make recycling easier. One of the biggest problems with the status quo labels is related to plastics -- specifically, complaints from consumers and recyclers who say many people don't understand the chasing arrows resin ID codes.
Today, thanks to a tweet from the American Chemistry Council's "Recycle Plastic" feed, I found a handy website that's supposed to help the public navigate the new labels.
The labels are being called "How 2 Recycle Labels," and the site is www.how2recycle.info.
Check it out for more information, and to better understand exactly what the labels mean.
Meanwhile, to help you recognize them when you see them, here's an example of one of the new labels:
I remembered that Plastics News wrote the very first stories about Inteplast's plans to build a massive extrusion plant in Lolita, Texas.
Now 20 years ago is pre-Internet, so I had to research this blog post the old-fashioned way -- I looked up our back issues from 1991 and 1992.
When I found those early stories about the plant, I discovered that my memory was mostly correct.
But I was surprised to see my byline on one of the first stories -- a Page 1 story on Oct. 19, 1992, about how the plant had started production.
How in the world did I forget one of my own stories?
Anyway, I thought it would be interesting to look at what that first story predicted, and to compare it what actually happened.
The initial story said the plant would eventually have capacity to make more than 150 million pounds of film annually, with sales greater than $100 million.
Pretty big numbers. But they're dwarfed by what Inteplast is today.
According to the Wave's story, Inteplast now has 21 plants and 2011 sales of more than $1.3 billion. That resin throughput figure is a bit higher too -- now it's more than 1 billion pounds.
Back when Inteplast opened its doors, I remember some sources in the industry predicted it would be a game-changer in several markets -- T-shirt bags, BOPP film, extruded profiles and more.
Those predictions, in this case, turned out to be true.
Here's a suprising fact: It has been five years since Procter & Gamble Co. launched a brand in the United States, and that product was niche probiotic Align.
Is P&G, which has a long history as a creator of innovative products, slipping?
Some analysts "doubt the power of P&G's innovation machine and voiced concerns that the company is too big and too complacent," Neff writes.
Chairman and CEO Bob McDonald is aware of the criticism and he's working on rebuilding the company's image. P&G spent more than $2 billion on R&D in the past two years, and it has projects in the pipline, he said.
What's the view of plastics suppliers to P&G?
We know on the packaging side that the company has been undertaking significant materials-related changes -- first disclosed in 2010 ("P&G outlines broad sustainability plans").
Does P&G have more plastics-related innovations ready to hit the market? Neff's story hints at one: a product named T@U, a patch for removable or temporary tattoos.
But don't expect Jon Jr. to come knocking on your door selling polyurethane resin.
One reason people run for president is for the publicity. Let's put it this way: How many people outside northeast Ohio knew Dennis Kucinich before 2003?
Now, after campaigning in the population-light states of Iowa and New Hampshire, Huntsman is a household name all across the country. His gig speaking at NPE even got a mention today in The Washington Post's "In the Loop" politics blog.
The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. often gets big names to speak at NPE, but it's rare to recruit one who gets a mention in the Post.
I fully expect that Huntsman's speech in Orlando will be a rehearsal for a primetime spot on the podium at August's Republican National Convention in Tampa.
Conventional wisdom says Huntsman isn't a natural choice for vice president. Utah's not packed with electoral votes, and if Romney is the nominee, I don't think the Republicans will be pushing an all-Mormon ticket.
But, depending on the results in November, Huntsman could be on his way to a nice head start on the GOP primary race for 2016.
I've described the proliferation of bag bans and taxes around the country -- indeed around the world -- like a Whac-a-Mole game.
For the industry, they're always popping up in different places, always requiring an urgent response.
For a while, all the action was in California. Now we've got bans and taxes on both coasts, and proposals in Texas, Ohio, Illinois -- just about everywhere.
Wondering how to keep up? There are several websites devoted to plastic bag laws. One I rediscovered this morning, thanks to Susan Freinkel's blog, is called plasticbaglaws.org.
Jennie Roemer, a San Francisco Bay-area lawyer, started the site as a resource for her own research, writes Freinkel, author of "Plastic: A Toxic Love Story."
In addition to keeping up with bag bans and taxes, the site also includes a links section with descriptions of all the sites.
After a slow start, it seems that more people in the plastics industry are getting interested in social media. But where to get started?
Quite a few blogs offer advice, and I've linked to some in the past. Today I received a note about a new site that specializes in social media for the business-to-business audience.
The site, by Global B2B Communications, is aimed at a non-marketing audience -- for example, engineers and technically-oriented managers.
My favorite post so far: "What happens when engineers use social media," by Amy Munice of Global B2B.
Other than LinkedIn groups, she writes, there's little in social media for engineers to get excited about.
"I've yet to speak to an engineer who is enthused about Tweets," she wrote.
Watch PlasticsNews.com for more on social media next week -- you may even learn more about why you should be using more than LinkedIn, and what Facebook and Twitter have to offer to the B2B audience.
Here's a good link for all the environmentalists in the plastics industry -- as well as those who realize that it's in the industry's best interest to irmprove its recycling record.
Today the American Chemistry Council sent a link to RecycleYourPlastics.org, a web site created to help communities recycle more plastics.
The portal includes information on different types of plastics, recent news releases recycling rates for film, containers and non-container rigid plastics.
It also includes tips, tools, best practices, case studies, and a section where readers can submit questions to experts.
The new report on plastic film and bag recycling is encouraging, but it's not going to end the debate on grocery bag taxes and bans.
Plastics News' Mike Verespej reported today that film and bag recycling in the United States jumped 14 percent in 2010 to 971.8 million pounds -- the first annual increase of more than 3 percent since 2006.
But Mark Murray, executive director of the Sacramento, Calif.-based Californians Against Waste, still feels that bag recycling has been a "failure."
Today our sister publication Waste & Recycling News posted a column by H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at NCPA, arguing that plastic bag bans hold hidden costs, and result in "little or no benefit for the environment."
"Contrary to the myth propagated by environmental lobbyists and other plastic bag opponents, plastic bags are rarely single-use items," Burnett wrotes. "Rather, long after plastic bags transport the groceries, people find a variety of ways to reuse them. They are used as lunch bags, car litter bags, to line bathroom trash bins, to collect dog waste and to seal soiled diapers. Other uses include carrying donation items to goodwill, transporting laundry to the cleaners and securing items in the garage and attic. Some people carry bags on walks to pick up stray trash.
"Without them, we will likely buy more trash bags and baggies to compensate. In stores that ban plastic grocery bags, shoppers have become creative, using thin plastic bags from the fresh vegetable sections of stores to carry out groceries -- double- and triple-lining them to make them work. Now that´s a waste nightmare and a sheer waste of resources."
How appropriate -- a day after the Super Bowl, Forbes.com has a Q&A interview today with the "other" Tom Brady -- you know, the plastics guy.
Of course I'm talking about Tom Brady, the founder of Plastic Technologies Inc., the packaging and recycling specialists in Holland, Ohio.
Gregg Fairbrothers interviewed Brady for a Forbes section on leadership. The interview covers his background at Owens-Illinois Inc., including his role in the company's efforts to commercialize PET containers, plus insight into his decision to leave the company and form PTI.
"Like many entrepreneurs, I began as a company of one person. I was Chairman, CEO, President, Chief Engineer, and Customer Service Manager; I was also the accountant and the janitor," Brady told Fairbrothers.
"The PTI family of companies now includes two manufacturing companies, two technical development and engineering service companies and three joint venture companies that license technology or sell specialty services to the packaging industry. We have more than 200 employees worldwide and many of the products you buy every day are sold in plastic containers designed by one of our companies.
"Interestingly, all of the other PTI companies were the "brainchildren" of PTI employees. Today we remain a private, employee-owned company and only a handful of professional employees have left us over our 26-year history," he said.
Check out the link for the full interview. Unlike that other Tom Brady, this one should be feeling pretty good about his team's performance today.
On top of the Forbes interview, I discovered just minutes after I posted this today that Brady is a new member of the Plastics Hall of Fame. He's one of 10 new inductees who will join the hall on April 1 at NPE2012 in Orlando, Fla.)
Here's the full list:
Thomas E. Brady, PhD. A pioneer of today's PET industry, Dr. Brady did fundamental research on polymer and packaging technology, founded Plastic Technologies, Inc. (PTI) and six other packaging-related companies, and received patents relating to PET and packaging.
Lawrence J. Broutman, ScD. A prolific researcher, Dr, Broutman has developed techniques for the analysis and characterization of polymer materials that have spurred further research and generated innovation in many plastics sectors. He has written nearly 170 technical publications and two textbooks, been awarded four patents, and received five best paper honors from the Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE).
Jay L. Gardiner. A tireless volunteer for plastics causes, Mr. Gardiner has been continuously active in service to the industry for more than two decades and has held leadership positions or board memberships with many plastics organizations.
Jobst U. Gellert. One of the most prolific inventors in Canadian history, Mr. Gellert has been awarded hundreds of patents. He patented the first commercially viable hot runner system in 1965 and built Mold-Masters Limited, a leading worldwide supplier of hot runner systems.
H. Gunther Hoyt. Mr. Hoyt has played important roles in the internationalization of the plastics industry and in the progress of SPI and the NPE exposition. He has also been a technological leader in the field of machine components.
Robert P. Kittredge. An entrepreneur and philanthropist, Mr. Kittredge founded Fabri-Kal Corp. in 1950. It is now the eighth-largest thermoformer in North America, serving the packaging market. Mr. Kittredge also established the Fabri-Kal Foundation, which has provided millions of dollars in scholarships and community grants.
H. Richard Landis. An inventor and entrepreneur, Mr. Landis has been a pioneer in injection molding. His company, Landis Plastics, grew from a one-machine operation in 1956 to an enterprise with six U.S. locations employing more than 2,100 people. He has been awarded 16 patents in the design of plastic parts. He participated in SPI's development of the resin identification code for the "chasing-arrow" recycling symbol.
Robert A. Malloy, PhD. An educator, researcher, and author, Dr. Malloy chairs one of the leading U.S. plastics engineering departments and has trained many engineers who have gone on to make an impact on the industry. He holds 16 patents, has been a principle investigator for more than 70 funded research projects, and has authored or co-authored more than 60 conference and journal papers in the field of plastics engineering.
Daniel W. McGuire, Jr. Dubbed "the father of resin distribution," Mr. McGuire founded the first plastics distributor in North America. His vision was to create an organization to fill in the gap between resin producers and small or medium-size processors. This became the mission of his company, General Polymers.
Timothy W. Womer. A widely recognized authority on plasticizing screws, Mr. Womer has designed thousands of these components. He holds 15 patents and is a prolific author and lecturer. He has been extensively involved with industry associations, held a number of leadership positions, and received several of the industry's most prestigious honors.
The story focuses on what types of bags local retailers use, and how some of them explain the decision to their customers.
The story isn't entirely pro-plastic, despite what the headline may imply. But Augusta Dwyer covers both the pluses and minuses of the different options in a balanced way.
That's good for consumers, who need facts to help make decisions -- not one-sided lectures.
Toronto retailers have been using fewer plastic bags since 2009, when they were required to start charging consumers 5 cents per bag.
That's resulted in a 75 percent drop in plastic bag use, according to the story.
Forget about moon colonies. A new thermoset composite, developed in part by Owens Corning through a joint development program with Lockheed Martin under the name Applied NanoStructured Solutions LLC, provides electrical magnetic interference shielding for vital components on the Juno satellite, which will orbit Jupiter to provide the best view yet of that planet.
The hybrid composite includes carbon enhanced reinforcements, produced by ANS.
Lockheed Martin describes the part as providing: "contoured supports to prevent thermal blanketing from interfering with the three solar array support mechanisms. The supports also provide an electrostatic discharge path. During its 5-year journey to Jupiter, the Lockheed Martin-made Juno spacecraft will rely on solar energy to power it computers and instruments."
Thanks to Plastics News staff reporter Rhoda Miel for today's post -- she discovered the project at the Society of Plastics Engineers Topcon event in San Antonio, Texas.
I'm praising one company today for its sustainability message, so forgive me for going negative on two others.
My targets -- Repurpose Compostables Inc. and Bed Bath & Beyond stores, for their misleading messages about line of compostable cups made from polylactic acid.
The original WRN story said: "Repurpose cups are made from polylactic acid -- made from corn -- and require 65 percent less carbon dioxide to make than plastic, the company said. The lids also are compostable, and no plastic means the cups are nontoxic."
Plastics industry defender and consulting engineer Allan Griff spotted that paragraph and sent me a quick note: "I assume the cupmaker said this, but PLA is a plastic, isn't it?"
Absolutely right, I replied, so I quickly corrected the story.
But Griff wasn't finished. He did some research on what else Repurpose and Bed Bath were saying about the cups, and he found more misleading information.
Both companies were openly contrasting their PLA product with "plastic," he said, feeding the public's fear of the plastics industry.
Griff found this on the Bed Bath & Beyond site:
The plant-based cup is made from corn, not oil like traditional disposable cups, so it's non-toxic and BPA free. It also lowers your carbon footprint, and uses soy based inks, so it is compatible with a zero waste program. Includes set of 12 cups and 12 lids.
As Griff points out, mentioning BPA in a commercial message about foam cups is like putting "no trans fats" on a water bottle label. Of course there's no bisphenol A. There's none in polystyrene cups, either.
So he added this review to the company's website, in the consumer comments section:
BB&B misinforms us. The cup material may be compostable, but who does this at home, and how many cities do it? As for petroleum, it takes plenty of petrobased energy to grow the corn and convert it to the compostable plastic (yes, plastic) PLA. As for carbon dioxide, by far the biggest producers are heating, cooling, lighting and transportation, and all this greenwashing is really a distraction from having to deal with room temperatures, lighting waste, and capricious car use.
He did some more checking and found that the cup maker, Repurpose, said this about itself:
Repurpose was founded in 2009 by a group of young environmental entrepreneurs, looking for quality solutions to the problem of single-use petroleum-based plastic products ... its mission [is] to replace all single-use disposable plastics with high quality, innovative, plant-based alternatives. Repurpose makes products from plants, not petroleum, using Ingeo resin.
Its FAQ section sometimes calls the cups polymers, but stresses the differences between PLA and plastic. For example, it says: "Repurpose products are now available to consumers and to businesses allowing everyone the opportunity to lessen their dependence on oil, lower their carbon footprint, and find non-toxic, safe alternatives to plastic."
Looking further, Griff found more information that he considered misleading.
One section says: "The revolutionary new insulated cup requires no sleeve, uses 65 percent less CO2 than a traditional cup to produce, and can be composted in 90 days."
Griff wrote to me: "But what are they talking about? We don't use CO2 to make cups. And we want to get it out of the atmosphere, not leave more in!
"What's a "traditional cup" now? Do they mean the foam cup, or the Starbuck Standard -- a paper cup with PE coating and a paper sleeve? If they mean that the manufacture of the cup uses less energy and production of energy creates CO2, that's creating less, not using less! And if they compare with paper as traditional, doesn't paper degenerate in composting as well?
"And if they compare [Repurpose cups] with foam cups, I'm not sure it takes more energy to produce them. The biggest energy impact of the foam cups arises from their lightness and volume, which means fewer cups per truck and thus more truck fuel per cup to ship it to its point of sale/use. I don't think they think that way. They got the words "less CO2" together, that sounds green and that's enough for them."
Did I mention that Griff is a pit bull when it comes to defending plastics against misinformation?
What's the next step? Griff is sharing his correspondence with the American Chemistry Council's plastics division, and he's also including it in his file of topics to discuss in a course he teaches at the University of California Berkeley Adult Extension program, "Plastics in the Environment."
That's not a typo -- Griff is teaching a course on plastics in the environment at Berkeley. Plastics Blog readers in California should consider enrolling -- it's sure to be both informative and entertaining.
Meanwhile, I'm happy to share Griff's efforts to shine the light on some companies that are using "bolonium" [one of his favorite terms] to prey on public plastophobia.
Glad highlights source reduction - but will consumers understand?
I don't expect to see commercial messages that reference plastic resin consumption during an NFL game.
But in commercials that ran last weekend during the football playoffs, Glad Products Co. chose to highlight source reduction achieved by its its Tall Kitchen trash bag line.
According to the ads, the bags are stronger, yet use less plastic, allowing the company to save 6.5 million pounds of plastic per year.
Or as the company puts it, the equivalent of keeping 140 million extra trash bags out of landfills annually.
Seems like a simple, clear message. But will the public understand? Can consumers be convinced that source reduction is a legitimate path to product sustainability?
It might be a tough sell, since many consumers are pre-programmed to think that the only way for a product to be sustainable is for it to be biodegradable or contain recycled content.
But Glad Products deserves credit for this very high profile attempt at educating customers about source reduction -- a strategy that's widely used by plastics processors.
The report cites Charles Shepard of Brandon, Manitoba, who noticed that when the bills are folded, they can develop cracks that can turn into rips.
Shepard ... put a full can of Coke on top of a new $100 bill.
When he pulled on it, he said the plastic bill ripped in half.
"It's similar to thin tin foil or plastic food wrap. "You pull on it but as soon as it's got a mark or tear on it, it just peels apart," he said.
I'd like to think a $100 note can stand up to a can of Coke. And the next time I find myself with a wallet full of hundreds, you can be sure I'll give it a try.
Political news junkies in the plastics industry got more than their share of interesting headlines this weekend.
The big new is that Jon Huntsman Jr. decided to drop out of the race for the Republican presidential campaign.
Huntsman, son of plastics Hall of Famer Jon M. Huntsman, entered the race six months ago, putting his efforts into the New Hampshire primary. But he finished third, and today he endorsed Mitt Romney for the GOP nomination.
Insiders don't expect this will end Huntsman Jr.'s political career. Perhaps we'll see him on the presidential campaign trail again in 2016.
The other big plastics-in-politics news comes from Missouri, where Dave Spence, the former president and CEO of St. Louis blow molder Alpha Packaging Inc., is running for governor.
Jake Wagman of the St. Louis Post-Dispatchreported this weekend that Spence's website contained some misleading biographical information.
The site said Spence earned a degree in economics from the University of Missouri. But he actually earned a bachelor of science degree in home economics.
Spence has changed the website, and he deflected the story with a bit of humor about his academic performance in college.
Is this all just a tempest in a teapot? Stay tuned to see how voters respond. Spence faces an opponent in the GOP primary.
What will the ADM-Metabolix divorce mean to bioplastics?
The future of bioplastics is a little fuzzier today, following Archer Daniels Midland Co.'s decision to drop out of its alliance polyhydroxyalkanoate resin company Metabolix Inc.
I included some insight into the news in the story posted on PlasticsNews.com last night:
Metabolix reported a loss of $29.2 milliion for the nine month period that ended Sept. 30, on sales of $567,000. ADM considered the business one that was "not delivering sufficient results now," and it was "not expected to deliver sufficient results within a reasonable timeframe."
Despite the steady news coverage of biopolymers in recent months -- remember Coke's commitment to using more bio-based resins? -- I differentiated the activity in making conventional resins made from plant materials vs. making corn-based polymers like PHA.
This morning I asked PN's two authorites on plant-based polymers, Frank Esposito and Mike Verespej, for their thoughts on the news. Here are some of our additional observations:
Metabolix and ADM started production of their Telles-brand PHA last year at a 110-million-pound-per-year plant in Clinton, Iowa. Typically that's the point where a resin takes a big step forward, when high-volume production brings down prices.
But PHA is still substantially more expensive than polylactic acid -- its main competition in plant-based resin. And lower prices for conventional plastics like polyethylene and polypropylene hurt prospects for bio-based materials, too.
Metabolix's stock price has fallen more than 40 percent today, to about $2.60 per share, following ADM's announcement.
Metabolix said it is conducting a strategic review of its business plans for 2012, and that it will restructure its bioplastics business and downsize its operations. CEO Richard Eno said the company is still "committed to successfully commercializing PHA bioplastics."
Going forward without ADM will require a major change in strategy, though.
Despite what you've heard, US plants still make plastic
I don't tend to spend a lot of time trying to correct news reports in other media, but I'll make an exception today.
Earlier today, National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" did a report on Shell Oil Co.'s plan to build a new petrochemical cracker in Ohio, West Virginia or Pennsylvania.
(As an aside, my guess is they'll pick West Virginia).
The report quotes a Case Western Reserve University geologist about the importance of the cracker to the domestic plastics industry. Unfortunately, the interview is boiled down to a point where it sounds like she believes plastic resin is no longer made in the United States.
"Plastic was made overseas, and that's because there wasn't enough natural gas," Beverly Saylor said. "But now with all the shale gas development, the price has come down on that, and so it's now worth it."
NPR tends to do good work, but I think they left listeners with the wrong impression on this story.
What they meant to say is that until recently, when companies started to tap into natural gas in the Western Marcellus and Utica Shale regions, there have been few investments in new polyethylene capacity in the United States.
Plastics News said as much last month, in a story by senior reporter Frank Esposito that started: "Cross this one off the list of things that were never going to happen again: New polyethylene capacity is headed for the U.S."
But that doesn't mean that no one has been making resin in the United States for the past decade. The truth is that the U.S. is consistently a net exporter of plastic resin. Even as the U.S. has racked up big trade deficits, plastic resin has been a rare bright spot.
For a while it has looked like at some point in the future the U.S. would become a net importer of resin. The experts had predicted that low-cost feedstocks in the Middle East would encourage manufacturers to make resin there and ship it around the world.
But the new natural gas discoveries in the United States seem to be giving new life to the domestic industry.
I hope this helps to set the record straight. Shell's new cracker will be big news. But it would be hyperbole to imply that it marks a return of resin manufacturing to the United States. Because it never really left.
What's actually returning is the investment in new capacity.
Recyclability is the only answer. Unfortunately although recycling packaging makes sense, in many cases the infrastructure isn't in place to make it a widespread practice. Consumers have to want to recycle too. In many cases it's simply too much trouble to save and dispose of in a recycling facility. Another quandary, washing out containers to recycle (you are using energy and water so where's the eco win?)
All plastic packaging is bad. Not true. There are so many new compounds and formulations that have been introduced. Companies are seriously looking at ways to not only reduce the amount of plastic used but alternative methods for disposal and reuse. I might mention here too that in many cases the eco plastic alternatives use more energy to manufacture and have disposal issues of their own.
Author describes challenges of living in a plasticized world
Journalist and author Harold Johnson has posted a column on the perils of plastics pollution that's worth a look, even for readers who are unapologetically pro-plastics.
You may remember Johnson -- he's the writer who researched and debunked the oft-cited statistic that plastic debris kills 100,000 marine animals a year.
He's also author of The Flotsam Diaries blog, where he records all the trash he picks up on a quiet beach in Saco, Maine..
Johnson's latest column appeared in The Portland Press Herald's "Maine Voices" section,
The headline: "In Maine and around the world, oceans, shores filling with plastic." Obviously he's not a big fan of single-use disposable plastics.
"We have filled our households and our lives with stuff we use for a month or a day or five minutes, but which persists for a dozen lifetimes," he writes. "The average American goes through 220 pounds of plastic a year."
He anticipates the argument that plastic pollution is a result of improper disposal, saying: "Garbage has always escaped from the waste stream. (Not to mention from windstorms, floods and worse disasters.) It always will. Despite our best efforts. Now that most garbage is plastic, every escapee adds to the persistent fouling of our shores and waters."
Johnson has a point. Remember the dramatic video footage of the tsunami striking Japan last year, sweeping away everything in sight?
Plastic pollution is already a serious problem -- Johnson knows from his own beach clean-up routine, and he also cites Columbia University research that estimates at least 73 million pounds of plastic now floats in the world's oceans.
Johnson's solution to the problem is simple -- he's an advocate of the philosophy that I'll call "use less stuff."
"Plastics certainly have their benefits and their place. But our gross overuse of them has polluted nearly every last pristine, remote place left in the world, as well as our own backyard. It's time to change the game," he writes.
Could there be another solution? Truly biodegradable plastics could help, although I don't expect them to be more than niche materials for the foreseeable future.
And I believe stepped up efforts to recycle single-use plastics can help. In the United States, at least, there's a lot of room for improvement in recycling nearly all plastic products. As Johnson notes, that wouldn't completely put a stop to the plastics litter problem.
Here's a fun plastics-related headline: the Occupy Seattle movement is banning plastic sporks (and paper plates) from their encampment's food service.
The news comes from Real Change, a Seattle, Wash., organization focused on providing opportunity and a voice for low-income and homeless people and taking action for economic justice.
They may not be clean, but they're green. Faced with criticism for alleged violence, drug use, and an insufficient political agenda, organizers of the leaderless movement known as Occupy Seattle are touting the "sustainability" of their Seattle Central Community College encampment.
Residents have banned plastic cutlery and paper plates from the encampment's meal service as part of a sustainability initiative, the campers said in a statement.
If they're going to be using traditonal metal forks and spoons, let's hope the encampment is clean, and not just green. No need to invite food poisoning to the Occupy movement.
Too bad they couldn't have found someone willing to recycle those used sporks.
In case you haven't been paying attention, not everyone thinks plastic bag bans are a bad thing.
Last week, Greenbiz.com senior editor Marc Gunther wrote a post in defense of plastic bags. Today, Stiv Wilson offers a counterpoint, "In Defense of Plastic Bag Bans."
Wilson works for the 5 Gyres Institute, which is focused on plastic pollution. Close readers of Plastics News will also remember his name for the petition he started on change.org to encourage the National Park Service to ban single-use water bottles from at the Grand Canyon.
It's clear that both Wilson and Gunther have a strong grasp of the issues related to plastic bags -- yet they come to opposite conclusions.
To Wilson, the bottom line is that plastic does not biodegrade.
What's at issue is this: Plastic does not biodegrade in a meaningful if even comprehensible timeframe. Thus, some portion of it accumulates in the environment. The more we produce, consume, and recycle plastics, the more plastic will come into the world and accumulate in landfills, on land, in rivers, and the sea. Plastics at sea concentrate incredibly dangerous chemicals, fish eat plastic, and we eat fish.
It's really that simple. This is why we care. It sure as hell isn't for the paycheck.
But wait -- is biodegradability a good thing? We've heard from recyclers concerned that increasing use of biodegradable plastics and additives would hurt their business.
Wilson points out that -- at least when it comes to plastic bags -- recycling isn't an issue. He estimates that the recycling rate for single-use plastic bags is about 1 percent.
That figure might be low -- Plastics News estimated the bag recycling rate at 2 percent in 2008, and it's likely to have grown since then. But that's not a record to crow about. So what we've seen the past few years is instead of running on its record of bag recycling, the industry has been forced to respond to bans by talking about the potential to recycle more bags.
Wilson knows that, and writes: "That plastics bags are 100 percent recyclable isn't the issue. It's that by a massive percentage they are not recycled. ... Furthermore, why are we investing in a system that has to fabricate bag recycling rates to trend positively, even though the fabricated trend still amounts for next to nothing? What society accepts a 4.3 percent efficacy rate in any system without abandoning it and going back to the drawing board?"
Wilson's post won't be the last word -- but it's required reading for anyone interested in the bag ban debate.
Care to guess the topic of the most-read story on PlasticsNews.com in 2011? Was it about resin pricing? A major industry acquisition? A hot trend like sustainability?
Take a guess -- I'll give the answer later in this column. But first, let's look at the biggest Plastics News stories from the second half of 2011, measured by web traffic.
Again, these are only the stories posted after July 1. Let's look at the top 25:
Braskem buying Dow's PP business Brazilian plastics giant Braskem SA made another big move in the polypropylene market in 2011, this time acquiring the PP business of Dow Chemical Co. for $323 million.
Prices fall for PP, PE, PVC, PS and ABS This story from early November reported that commodity resin prices were tumbling, with polypropylene experiencing the steepest drop -- a 14-cent dive since Oct. 1.
Neil Kruschke Jr., former Stopol owner and CEO, dies in chainsaw accident PN was the first to report the sad news that Neil Kruschke Jr., former owner and CEO of plastics equipment dealer Stopol Inc. and its auction business, Stopol Auctions LLC, had died in a tragic accident on Aug. 26 at age 44.
Sabic's Charlie Crew retiring, DuPont's Keith Smith on board In the afternoon of Nov. 23, just before the Thanksgiving holiday, Sabic Innovative Plastics announced that long-time executive Charlie Crew would retire on Jan. 1, and that he would be replaced by Keith J. Smith, most recently DuPont Co.'s vice president for sourcing and logistics.
China's new regulation shakes up plastic recycling industry In November we reported that plastics scrap imports through China's Guangzhou customs fell by more than 80 percent in the past two months, as the local customs stepped up enforcement of a new regulation on solid waste imports.
Markets shift, struggles persist Resin supply and demand is in the spotlight again -- this time it's our annual report on the outlook for commodity materials.
Kraft pushes innovation, sustainability How does Perfecto Perales, senior director of packaging research for Kraft Foods Inc., feel about the sustainability of plastics packaging? Not surprisingly, a lot of you wanted to know.
Fortis closing Fort Smith, Ark., plant This was our first story that hinted at problems at Fortis Plastics LLC. Within a matter of weeks, most of the company had shut down.
Dow ramping up molding of solar shingles We've been writing about Dow Chemical Co.'s foray into solar shingles since 2008. Quite a few Plastics News readers are paying close attention.
Phillips Sumika closing Texas PP plant As polypropylene prices fell in the second half of 2011, this supplier reacted to the news by shutting down capacity.
Fortis Plastics to auction off equipment The New Year will bring a giant auction -- more than 130 injection presses and 20 extruders -- from four closed-down plants of Fortis Plastics LLC.
Our coverage of the problems at the Coke joint venture recycling plant in Spartanburg, S.C., generated big reader traffic in the first half of this year.
A voice in defense of plastic bags -- but is it too late?
Marc Gunther, senior writer for GreenBiz.com, posted a long defense of plastic bags on his website today. But judging by other headlines in recent weeks, I wonder if anyone will pay attention.
Plastic bag litter is not as bad as some critics have implied.
Recycling is a viable alternative to bans.
He concludes: "The truth is, we don't really have a clear answer to the age-old question of 'paper or plastic,' now amended to say 'paper, plastic or reusable?' Too many variables are at play.
"My own answer? I carry several reusable bags in the trunk of my (hybrid) car and bring them into the grocery store when I remember. When I don't, I take plastic and bring it back to be recycled. I don't feel bad about that. Neither should you," Gunther wrote.
But is it too late for debate and reasoned arguments? Recent headlines suggest to me that the pace of bag bans and taxes will accelerate in 2012.
Seattle passed a bag ban on Dec. 19. The law may face a challenge -- although Seattle Times columnist Danny Westneat thinks that's unlikely. He opposed Seattle's previous effort to tax bags, but he says this attempt is "reasonable."
Hawaii's Big Island also approved a bag ban -- that news came yesterday. Mayor Billy Kenoi could still veto the bill. But there's momentum for eventual approval of a bag ban or tax that would cover all of Hawaii.
For more background on the plastics industry's strategy for fighting bag bans, check Plastics News staff reporter Mike Verespej's recent story.
He explains how the Society of the Plastics Industry is taking charge of fighting local efforts to tax or ban plastic bags, while the American Chemistry Council is putting its muscle behind an effort to improve film and bag recycling.
It seems like a reasonable plan. But the question remains, is it too late?
How would you like your heirs battling over your estate, in court, through press releases and social media?
That's what's happening with the heirs to Yung-Ching Wang, multi-billionaire founder of Formosa Plastics Group. I wrote about the battle in August 2009, and now things are starting to heat up.
According to the release, Winston Wong -- YC Wang's oldest son -- believes certain defendants named in his claim have siphoned off assets that are part of YC Wang's estate.
"Since my father's death more than three years ago, I have sought a full and transparent global accounting of all assets that should have been included in his estate. What I have found, through an extensive independent international investigation, is a web of deception intended to conceal his assets and deny the majority of his heirs, including my brother and sisters, their rightful legacy. The results of this international investigation have brought me to Hong Kong," Wong said in the release.
"My legal team and I intend to show the Hong Kong court how businesses and assets belonging to my father were wrongfully diverted into shadow corporations, bank accounts and secretive off-shore trusts. We have a very strong case in Hong Kong. As Y.C. Wang's eldest son I will carry this fight to other jurisdictions wherever necessary, until justice is done. My cause is just and my fight continues."
The news release refers readers to this video, posted on YouTube and at www.ycwangtruth.com.
Formosa Plastics Corp. USA is a major PVC and polyolefin supplier, and the company has other major U.S. affiliates.
I wrote back in 2009 that this case promised enough personal intrigue to keep a team of soap opera writers busy for the next year.
It looks like I underestimated how long it would take to play out.
Some thoughts on Coke's leadership on bio-based resin
Coca-Cola Co. is taking a leading role in advancing bio-based plastics. That's been obvious for about two years, since the company introduced PET bottles made, in part, from renewable monoethylene glycol.
Now the company is working on the next step, to make large quantities of its bottles from 100 percent plant-based plastics.
Plastics News' staff reporter Mike Verespej reported yesterday how Coke is making multi-million dollar investments in three bio-based companies: Virent Inc., Gevo Inc. and Avantium Research and Technology.
Mike's story was one of the first on the announcement, but more importantly it was probably the most thorough. That's because he was already quite familiar with all three of Coke's new partners and the technology that they bring to the table.
Mike wrote in detail about Virent and Gevo earlier this year. I encourage PN readers who are interested in more information about bio-based plastics to re-read that story: "Cost, viability will determine bio-winners."
Coke is making a big push into bio-based materials this year. The company has said it expects to convert all of its PET packaging to PlantBottle materials -- made from sugar-cane ethanol -- by 2020.
We could be headed for a debate on the merits of recycled vs. bio-based content in plastics packaging. If so, there will be winners and losers -- and I doubt Coke will be on the losing side.
I got some criticism from readers for that comment. And it may be that Coke will stay committed to both goals: using more recycled content and using bio-based plastics.
But I feel it's still worth watching.
Finally, let me highlight a comment from Mike's story yesterday. He wrote that Rick Frazier, Coke's vice president of commercial bottle supply, said moving to bottles made entirely from plants is imperative because of Coke's goal is to double the daily serving from Coca-Cola beverages to 3 billion by 2020.
"To double our business in a sustainable way, we must find a new way to do more with less," he said.
At the risk of repeating myself: Coke has some big goals that are related directly to plastics packaging. This is a company that looks further ahead than most OEMs.
I would argue that even companies that don't supply Coke -- even companies that aren't in the packaging sector -- are going to be impacted by this decision.
Do strangers notice you checking the bottoms of containers in the supermarket?
Most normal people aren't curious about who made the container, or the tool, or what kind of resin they used.
But if you're like me, you can't resist checking out unusual packages.
In fact, I'm sure that the real hard-core plastics packaging fans who read the Plastics Blog are thinking, "Why doesn't he start taking pictures and sharing them in the blog?"
Right?
It's a sickness.
I bring this up because I spotted a delightful story today from Window Film magazine by its editor, Katie Hodge.
Hodge writes about how she took her soon-to-be husband to the SEMA trade show in Las Vegas, where he learned about her business: covering manufacturers of window film and tinting.
Later, while they were honeymooning in Costa Rica, he pointed out some "terrible" tint jobs.
"The film is bubbling and in some places has totally peeled off. Plus, it definitely has that purple color," he told her.
Hodge writes: "I agreed and we chatted for a minute about window film. Then I sat in silence and wondered how I managed to find a way to discuss window film while on my honeymoon. At first I thought maybe I am just contagious and the week spent in Vegas at SEMA infiltrated his brain. Then it hit me. Window film is everywhere. It's not that we are obsessed with window film (really, I'm not!), but you can't escape it. It's a worldwide product with global appeal."
Can you relate? I'm not sure I've ever consciously noted a bad window film before. But now that she put the idea in my head, I'll probably start.
Remember a couple of years ago, when we rarely saw stories about U.S. molders buying more than a press or two?
I could go on, so I will.
Rememer when most of the M&A stories were about distressed companies, and many had a "Chapter 11" in their history?
When a lot of the Page 1 and Page 3 news in each week's Plastics News were about plant closings? It got to the point where layoffs alone weren't really newsworthy -- almost everyone was doing that.
I bring it up because lately it seems like we're being buried in good news stories, and I'm hoping that PN readers have noticed the trend.
Today we have twostories about machinery company expansions in the United States -- and that follows a string of others in recent weeks. That would have been unheard of in 2008 or 2009.
After hearing whispers and rumors for months about processors bringing back work to the United States from China, we've had several stories about specific projects -- including one more today. A lot of these stories have been about small projects, but it's still a promising trend for U.S. molders.
We've even got a $6 million investment by a start-up construction sector company today. I don't know if that market is going to start to show signs of life, but this is a good start.
And, as we've noted in numerous stories this year, the U.S. resin sector is starting to re-invest in production, thanks to the anticipated in natural gas boom.
A year ago, a lot of companies were unsure about their prospects for 2011. It's nice to think that managers are more confident going into 2012,
Diane Todd, senior chemist, quality control laboratories at Westlake Chemical Corp., said a survey of D20 members found that many did not have a written procedure for identifying pellet abnormalities.
So members were surveyed and asked to list terms used by their organizations, and these terms formed the initial list used to develop ASTM D7711.
"Anyone who is in contact regarding polymeric pellets will now be able to communicate with the same terminology to anyone else," said Todd, the chairman of D20.92, as well as the chair of the task group that developed ASTM D7711.
"This will hopefully help polymer manufacturers, sales personnel, technical service representatives, quality control/quality assurance personnel and buyers/users identify issues with the pellets the same way, thereby expediting assistance with the issues."
I have to believe the subcommittee had some fun developing this standard. Couldn't we come up with amusing names for undersized, bloated or oddly shaped pellets?
And think of the revenue-generating opportunities. Having an abnormal pellet named after you could be the equivalent of naming a star.
The Uni-Bell PVC Pipe Association and its members have long been trying to get people to pay attention to the decaying water infrastructure. Now they're trying a new approach.
The group is encouraging its 9,000+ Facebook followers to shoot pictures of water main breaks or repairs in their local communities and submit them as contest entries to win an iPad.
The goal is to create more awareness of our nation's decaying water infrastructure. According to Uni-Bell:
More than 850 water main breaks happen each day in North America, the majority from corrosion-prone iron pipes.
The corrosion epidemic costs U.S. drinking water and wastewater systems more than $50.7 billion annually.
Submitted photos will be posted on the association's Facebook page on Feb. 1, and the winner will be determined through voting by the followers. The deadline for entries is Jan. 30.
Interesting use of social media. Given what people will do for an iPad these days, I imagine this will help Uni-Bell attract some new "followers," and possibly raise the awareness of the nation's leaky drinking water infrastructure.
Remember the story about the antique cannon that was stolen from a Michigan plastics fabricator? Good news: it's been recovered.
Edston Plastic Co. in Romulus, Mich., was making a plastic replica of the cannon to be used as a donation container at a museum, but it was stolen in November, probably by thieves who expected to sell the 225-pound bronze item for scrap,
According to the Detroit Free Press, Detroit police found the cannon on Tuesday after receiving a tip about its whereabouts.
And I was waiting for it to show up on Pawn Stars.
"In this new trailer, we get a little more than just a boy who falls in love with a girl kind of story," Mike Lee writes for FusedFilm.com. "It is revealed that there are villainous industrial tycoons who will try to do anything to stop our hero from successfully growing a tree in a world of plastic. Fox News is going to have a field day with this one when the movie is released. "
Check out the trailer below. Celebrity voices include Danny DeVito, Zac Efron, Ed Helms, Taylor Swift, Rob Riggle, and Betty White.
Hewlett-Packard Co., leads Greenpeace International's new list of electronics companies ranked by energy usage, green products and sustainable operations.
Jeremy Carroll, a colleague at Waste & Recycling News, wrote about the report today. He notes new criteria this year also challenged the companies to reduce their carbon footprint in manufacturing, in their supply chain and through the end-of-life phase for their products.
Here are some materials-related highlights, directly from the Greenpeace reports. In addition to the details about phasing out certain materials, processors may note that Greenpeace now is looking favorably about companies that are using post-consumer plastics.
"[HP] scores the least points in the Products category; although it scores comparatively well for its progress on phasing out the use of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from its product range and is on track to achieve 90 percent of its new goal to phase out BFR and PVC in newly introduced personal computing products in 2011. HP needs to report on the amount of post-consumer plastics it uses as a percentage of all plastics and publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines, as well as show more innovations to extend product life. HP does not provide a summary of the energy efficiency of its products by giving
a percentage of its products that meet the latest Energy Star standards (or other relevant international standard for external power systems); this should be published on its
website, for each product range. However, HP risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of trade associations that have commented against stringent
energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"Dell scores poorly on all the other Products criteria. Although it reports on the quantities of post-consumer recycled plastics used, this is not given as a percentage
of total plastics use and there is no target and timeline for increasing its use. Dell needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product
lines in order to score any points for extending its products life cycle. Dell does not provide figures on the percentage of its products that meet and exceed the latest Energy Star
standard, although it offers tools for users to optimise energy efficiency. Dell also risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of trade associations that
have commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"On Products [Nokia] scores no points for the use of recycled plastics; although it now reports that the Nokia 700 is its first smartphone to use recycled plastics which make up 33 percent of the plastics used, it needs to expand its use further and report total use as a percentage of all plastics used in order to score points. To score on the products life cycle criteria it needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines. It scores close to maximum points on the new criteria for hazardous substances in products, with all of its products free from almost all the specified hazardous substances, missing the target because it does not include all antimony compounds in its restrictions on hazardous substances. It continues to score maximum points for the energy efficiency of its products; it has achieved its target of reducing no-load power used by its chargers by 50 percent from 2006 to 2010 and has set a new target of 75 percent by 2012. However, Nokia risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of trade associations that have commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"[Apple] continues to score well on the Products criteria; all Apple products are now free of PVC vinyl plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs), with the exception of PVC free power cords in countries where their safety certification process is still ongoing; however, it does not mention plans to phase out antimony or beryllium. Apple scores a point for its information on battery life for the product life cycle criterion, but it needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines. It provides no information on its use of post-consumer recycled plastics. It gets maximum points for reporting that all of its products meet or exceed the latest Energy
Star standards for energy efficiency, however, it risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of a trade association that has commented against stringent
energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"On Products [Philips] has brought a number of product ranges onto the market that are free from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs), as well as six phthalates and antimony, to add to the industry's first PVC/BFR free TV, the Econova LED TV, as part of its commitment for all new products to be free from these substances from 2011. It needs to commit to phase out exempted uses of beryllium and all phthalates. Philips has a target to double its use of recycled plastics by 2015, but needs to specify if this is post-consumer recycled plastics; it also needs to report the percentage of post-consumer plastics it uses currently. To score points on the product life cycle criteria Philips needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for their main product lines. It also has targets to increase the energy efficiency
of its products but needs to update its information on the percentage of its products that meet and exceed the Energy Star standards. Philips risks a penalty point in future
Guide editions as it is a member of a trade association that has commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive
positions with a strong statement."
"Sony Ericsson takes 6th place in the re-launched Guide. It is one of the top scorers in the Products category, scoring maximum points for the energy efficiency of its
phones, its advice to users and its targets to increase their efficiency. It is close to scoring maximum points for its avoidance of hazardous substances in its products, with only a few exemptions for uses of antimony and some types of phthalates remaining. It reports the recycled plastics content for several of its phones but still needs to report the amount of recycled plastic sourced as a percentage of all plastics used. To score on the product life cycle category it needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines."
"Samsung takes 7th position in the re-launched Guide. The penalty point which was first imposed in v.14 of the Guide for backtracking on its commitment to eliminate
brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in new models of all products by January 2010 and PVC vinyl plastic by end of 2010 has been lifted. It now has notebooks, mobile phones
and MP3 players that are free from these substances, but its commitment to phase out hazardous substances now only covers some product groups - TVs and household
appliances are no longer included. Samsung does reasonably well on other Products criteria - it is one of the leaders on the new product life cycle criteria for providing
information on its warranties and provision of spare parts as well as details of innovations. Samsung also scores well for the energy efficiency of its products, but it risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of a trade association that has commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"Lenovo takes 8th place in the re-launch of the Guide; it benefits from the removal of the penalty point that was imposed for backtracking on its commitment to eliminate PVC vinyl plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in all its products by the end of 2009. While its current goal for new products in 2011 to be PVC/BFR free has not been completely met, Lenovo has launched a number of PVC/BFR free products, including notebooks and a desktop and many components are PVC/BFR free. On other Products
criteria it scores well for its use of recycled plastics, where a slightly higher percentage of post-consumer plastics use would earn Lenovo maximum points. However, to score any points on product life cycle it needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines. It reports on the percentage of products that meet and exceed the Energy Star standard, although this needs to be a higher percentage for more points. Lenovo risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of a trade association that has commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"Panasonic is one of the top scorers on Products, scoring well for product life cycle as it provides information about its warranties and replacement parts, as well as many examples of innovation to make its products last longer. It has many products that are free from polyvinyl chloride plastic (PVC), and plans to eliminate PVC and brominated
flame retardants (BFRs) from its notebooks and mobile phones by the end of 2011, but this commitment does not extend to all of its products. It reports on its use of recycled plastics but does not specify whether this is post-consumer plastic. It scores maximum points for the energy efficiency of its products for reporting that 100 percent of its TVs meet the latest Energy Star standards and exceed the standby power requirement. However, it risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of trade associations that have commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"Sony also risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of trade associations that have commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement. On Products its performance on the energy efficiency of its products earns top marks; all of its TVs meet or exceed the latest Energy Star standards. It uses comparatively high quantities of post-consumer recycled plastics but no longer provides information on its use of recycled plastics as a percentage of total plastics used. It is less impressive on the other products criteria; it scores no points on product life cycle as it does not report on the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines. Although it has phased out polyvinyl chloride plastic (PVC) from many of its products the scope of its phase out of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) is limited."
"[Sharp] scores most of its points on the Products criteria for the energy efficiency of its products, reporting that all of its TVs meet the latest Energy Star standard, with 90 percent of them exceeding the requirements for sleep mode. However, it risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member of a trade association that has commented against
stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement. Sharp has many products that are free from polyvinyl
chloride plastics (PVC) but its phase out of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) is mostly limited to casings and it has not met its commitment; it it needs to communicate the
dates when new products will be free of PVC, phthalates, BFRs and antimony. It reports on its use of recycled plastics but not as a percentage of total plastics used. Sharp provides some examples of extending product life cycle but does not publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines."
"Acer takes 12th position with a score of 2.9. ... However, it does report on the use of post- consumer recycled plastic in monitor casings of seven families of EPEAT Gold models. It has also launched many new models of products that are free from polyvinyl chloride plastic (PVC) and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and it has informed Greenpeace that the majority of its products will be PVC/BFR free in the near future. A higher percentage of its products need to meet or exceed the latest Energy Star standards
in order for it to score more points on product energy efficiency."
"LGE scores 2.8 points and takes joint 13th place, together with Toshiba. It benefits from having a penalty point lifted, imposed for backtracking on its commitment to have all its products free of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) by the end of 2010. All of LGE's mobile phones are now free from PVC and BFRs as well as phthalates, antimony trioxide and beryllium oxide; other products such as TVs and notebooks have many PVC/BFR free parts and LGE aims to phase these substances out
from TVs monitors and PCs by 2012 and household appliances by 2014. On other Products categories LGE scores best for its product energy efficiency; it regains points that it lost in the last edition by making a strong statement in support of more stringent Energy Star verification standards. LGE reports on the quantities of post-consumer plastics that it uses and gives an example of a product with recycled content, but does not have a target to increase its use of recycled plastics. It does not yet score on the product life cycle category, as there is no information on product warranties or replacement parts availability."
"Toshiba scores 2.8 points and takes joint 13th place, together with LGE. It also benefits from having its two penalty points lifted, which were imposed for backtracking on its commitment for all new consumer electronics products to be free of PVC vinyl plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) by 1 April 2010 and for misleading its customers
and Greenpeace by not admitting that it would not meet its public commitment. It released a PC in March 2011 which is PVC and BFR free. It has also made a new commitment
to phase out PVC, BFRs, antimony and compounds, beryllium and compounds and phthalates by FY2015 from ALL its consumer products; the timeline is unreasonable, however, the fact that it covers all products and a range of hazardous substances is welcome. It also scores poorly on other Products criteria; it provides some information on extending product life but does not publish information on its warranties and availability of spare parts. The quantities of recycled plastics it uses have also gone down. It needs to report on the percentage of its products that meet and exceed Energy Star standards for each product range. However, it risks a penalty point as it is a member of a trade association
that has commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement."
"RIM makes its first appearance in the Guide in last place, with 1.6 points. ... For Products it only scores points for the energy efficiency of its products, for reporting that its Blackberry charger gets the European Commission IPP 4-star rating, although it does not report on the energy efficiency of its chargers as a percentage of all its external power devices. It also risks a penalty point in future Guide editions as it is a member
of a trade association that has commented against stringent energy efficiency standards; it needs to distance itself from such regressive positions with a strong statement. For hazardous substances, RIM should set timelines to phase out their use in all of its products. It needs to publicly disclose the length of warranty and spare parts availability for its main product lines to score points on the product life cycle criteria."
Would the phrase "Make it work" be appropriate here? Lexus had four designers -- jewelry, shoes, eyewear and clothing -- create something from parts from its CT Hybrid.
Final products included:
"Nomadic Sanctuary"--A sleek trench coat, shorts and clutch designed by John Patrick, featuring floor mats made from plant-based plastic, sustainable sound-dampening material, wire harness, leather seat covers and cargo covers
"The Luna Shoe"--Created by Alejandro Ingelmo using armrest leather trim and clear plastic tubing.
Thanks to Rhoda Miel, Plastics News' staff reporter in Detroit, for this item.
And Rhoda's not even embarrassed to say that she remembers that TV's "Project Runway" had a challenge to make clothing out of car parts some seasons ago. (A Saturn.)
How's this for a pro-plastics message: "Open up your eyes to the generation of plastic and see how it affects every part of your day."
That line comes from "Wake Up! It's the Plastics Age," the big winner in the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s first student video contest.
The video was submitted by Jason Paris of the Pennsylvania College of Technology. The prize: An iPad2 with 64GB, Wi-Fi +3G; $2,000; and a three-day trip to NPE2012 in Orlando, Fla., iincluding round-trip air transportation and hotel accommodations, one NPE2012 Expo Pass, and two Universal Studios Tickets.
The contest was created to celebrate SPI's 75th anniversary. College students (undergraduate and graduate level) studying in plastics programs were invited to submit original videos that honor plastics' innovation.
"We were extremely impressed with the videos we received. They will all help to spread the good news about how plastics benefit our society," Washington-based SPI said in a news release announcing the winners.
Second place goes to "The True Meaning of Plastics," submitted by Angela Beltran of the University of Akron.
And third place goes to "Plastics," submitted by Emily Bowser & Meghan Stefanko of Penn State-Behrend.
Following up on their meeting and joint declaration on plastics and marine debris back in March, global plastics industry leaders met again in Dubai this week.
According to a news release put out by the American Chemistry Council's Plastics Division and PlasticsEurope, the group identified 100 projects in 32 countries that are aimed at addressing the issue.
The group is inviting assistance from other stakeholders.
"The global plastics industry is determined to do its part and to play a constructive role in building new partnerships to create solutions to the issue of marine litter," PlasticsEurope Executive Director Wilfried Haensel said in the release.
"Plastics makers from around the globe agree that our products don't belong in world's oceans," said Steve Russell, vice president of plastics for the American Chemistry Council. "And, plastics are valuable resources even after use. We look forward to doing our part and working with partners to implement solutions that keep more valuable plastics in productive use through improved stewardship and expanded infrastructure to grow recycling and energy recovery."
The plastics industry isn't standing in the way of recycling
The plastics industry is not an obstacle to recycling. But despite all the effort that many have put into recycling, that's not universally understood outside the industry.
I've been writing editorials for Plastics News pushing for expanding bottle deposit programs for almost 20 years.
In a 1994 column favoring a national deposit program, I wrote:
"Certainly this would appear to be a radical idea. But consider the benefits to the industry:
It would provide recyclers with a plentiful supply of clean, uncontaminated raw material.
"Supporting, rather than opposing, the legislation would provide a shot in the arm for the industry's environmental image.
"It would give a huge boost to the industry's recycling rate-which may be needed if plastics packaging is to reach its goal of recycling 25 percent of bottles and rigid containers by 1995."
It may surprise readers outside the plastics industry to learn that my column did not prompt an outcry from readers, or a slew of canceled subscriptions.
That's because, despite the reputation that plastics may have, your average plastics industry executive/ company owner/ worker is not opposed to recycling.
As I've written before, many actually consider themselves environmentalists. And the fact that they work in plastics doesn't present a moral dilemma. They know that plastics can help save energy and materials in many applications.
But her column seems to imply that plastics manufacturers are the obstacle.
"Consider single-use plastic water bottles," she writes. "Companies that manufacture the billions of plastic water bottles flooding the market claim the product is 'eco friendly' because the bottles are recyclable.
"In reality, only 12 percent of the 15 billion throwaway water bottles manufactured each year are being recycled. ... That being the case, manufacturers should make good on their claim that their bottles are recyclable by putting a deposit on the bottles to ensure they're returned to a recycling facility."
First -- and this is a relatively minor point -- the 2010 U.S. recycling rate for PET bottles was 29.1 percent. I think that's a more relevant number to cite than MacEachern's 12 percent number.
But the more important point is that her column may give readers the impression that plastic bottle manufacturers are opposed to plastics recycling. And that's just not true.
If anything, bottle manufacturers would like access to more high-quality recycled PET -- the kind that they could get from expanded bottle deposit programs.
And in the spirit of America Recycles Day, let me thank all the readers who diligently recycle all of their plastic containers -- whether or not they get a dime in the process.
Alpha Packaging's Dave Spence running for governor
Another plastics company CEO is trying his hand at politics.
Today Dave Spence, president and CEO of St. Louis blow molder Alpha Packaging Inc., said he will pursue the Republican nomination for governor of Missouri.
The official announcement will come sometime in the next few weeks.
Spence will likely face a primary race against current GOP Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder. The winner will probably face the incumbent Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat.
Eli Yokley of PoliticMo.com writes that Spence, "armed with his own money and Republican unease about the current field of candidates, is a major setback to Lt. Governor Peter Kinder, who has hoped for years to have an easy shot at the Republican nomination."
"[I] was hoping to avoid a primary but it is not a perfect world unfortunately," Spence told PoliticMo.com. "You just can't talk about things, sometimes you have to jump in and fix them. I am doer and not one to armchair quarterback things,"
Alpha Packaging ranked No. 18 in Plastics News' most recent survey of North American blow molders, with sales of $189 million.
If Spence wins, he could be following in the footsteps of another plastics industry political novice. In 2010, Ron Johnson, then president of sheet extruder Pacur LLC in Oshkosh, Wis., unseated Democrat Russ Feingold for a U.S. Senate seat in Wisconsin.
But not all plastics executives-turned politicians have had the same degree of success. Here's a quick rundown on some recent examples:
Jon Huntsman Jr. -- former plastics company executive, governor of Utah and ambassador to China -- is currently a candidate for the GOP nomination for president.
Bill Binnie, the founder of Carlisle Plastics Inc. -- once a major film extruder, blow molder and injection molder -- last year lost the GOP nomination for a U.S. Senate seat in New Hampshire.
U.S. Rep. John Boehner, the current Speaker of the House of Representatives, was previously the president of Nucite Sales, a small distributor of plastics and packaging products.
Darrell Issa, a member of the U.S. House of Representative from Vista, Calif., also has a plastics industry background. Issa is the former CEO of Directed Electronics Inc., a business he founded that makes vehicle security systems and car audio equipment. Initially the company injection molded components for the systems, but later outsourced the work to custom molders.
Can you think of more politicians with plastics industry experience? Share them in the comments section, and we'll try to compile a more complete list.
Report: Chicago's high costs were an 'excuse' to move NPE
Our sister newspaper Crain's Chicago Business has a report on what went wrong in the city's convention business, resulting in McCormick Place losing several events, including the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows.
Among the findings: internal memos from the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, (the agency known as McPier that runs McCormick Place) that the agency "made an unprecedented effort" to keep NPE in Chicago.
According to the story: "McPier offered financial incentives for the triennial plastics show to stay in 2012 and 2015, including discounts on space rental and price freezes for services and labor. (McPier redacted the exact numbers from the documents it provided Crain's.)"
Juan Ochoa, McPier's CEO, "even laid off 100 electricians to demonstrate his commitment to making some changes," the story says.
Ochoa told Crain's that McPier probably didn't stand a chance. As we all recall, the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s NPE executive committee decided to move the 2012 and 2015 shows to Orlando, Fla.
NPE was declining and it "needed to create a diversion," Ochoa told the newspaper. "The [higher costs] were certainly an excuse for them to leave the city, especially since we gave them the most aggressive package of incentives we had given to any show during my tenure."
Crain's reported that SPI reported a 28 percent drop in show attendance between its 2006 and 2009 events, and a 24 percent decline in membership revenue in the same period, forcing the group to lay off one-third of its staff.
Crain's also reports: "[An SPI spokesman] says the association is looking forward to its upcoming Orlando event and will not comment on what happened at McCormick Place or on the state of its finances. But a spokesman for the Chicago riggers union confirmed that up to 75 of its members will travel to Orlando to help secure the heavy machinery on the show floor, working at Chicago labor rates and with all expenses paid."
To add some context to the story, keep in mind that attendance at the 2009 NPE show suffered because of the impact of the Great Recession. SPI membership also took a major hit with the economic crisis.
Is it a surprise that McPier offered unprecedented incentives to keep NPE? No way. As we reported at the time, the five-day NPE2009 show generated $95.3 million in direct spending, according to the Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau. The numbers for the 2006 show -- held in healthier economic times -- were even better, an estimated $154.7 million.
McPier had to pull out all the stops to try to keep that business in the city.
Is it possible that SPI's NPE executive committee would have voted to move NPE to Orlando regardless of what McPier offered? I don't know, but it's possible.
It's not a big scoop to say many NPE exhibitors who were unhappy with McPier. Remember the $345.39 that one exhibitor paid for four cases of Pepsi, and how that story captured how many felt they were being ripped off in Chicago?
I've talked to exhibitors who felt that real change in Chicago would never happen unless they moved the show to Orlando, at least for two show cycles. Some definitely felt a warm fuzzy feeling about dealing with Orlando and the Orange County Convention and Visitors Bureau, especially in comparison to McPier.
Some exhibitors say Chicago never got serious about changing its convention center until it became clear that SPI was serious about moving the show.
For the record, I think Chicago is a great place for NPE. Geographically, it's almost perfect for a U.S. manufacturing show. Exhibitors and attendees are familiar with the city and the venue. And you can't beat June in Chicago.
But after holding NPE in Chicago since 1971, some SPI members were looking for a change,
Cost was a big part of the decision to move the show. SPI says exhibitors in Orlando will save an estimated $10 million on travel and exhibiting compared to what they would have paid in Chicago.
There are still some big questions to answer about the future of NPE, not the least of which is whether companies will really save that much money.
But I expect the 2012 show will be better than 2009. The economy is better, and manufacturing in North America has stabilized. And now Orlando -- not Chicago -- is poised to benefit from a stronger NPE.
According to the story, the fabricator was making a plastic replica of the cannon. The replica was going to be used as a donation container at a museum.
Ed Roberts, owner of Edston Plastic, said the burglars cleaned out his business, taking power tools and several 200-pound boxes of aluminum -- and the cannon.
The cannon's owner is offering a $1,000 reward -- about double the scrap value of the weapon, but significantly less than its actual value.
When raw material prices are high, I tend to see more stories about plastics companies being robbed of valuable commodities: steel tooling, copper piping, even plastic pallets.
Let's just hope the burglars in this case don't decide to use the cannon in their next armed robbery.
Bruce Benda, vice president for automotive & transportation at Bayer MaterialScience LLC, had one of the best answers.
First, the context. Benda cited an example of a long fiber polyurethane underbody that the company helped design for a Ford Explorer simulation. The part could have helped save a whopping 45 pounds.
For an industry that's trying to save grams, 45 pounds is massive.
So why isn't this in commercial production yet?
"This industry is very firmly entrenched in existing infrastructures and technologies," Benda said. But he hastened to say that he's excited about the potential for progress now.
What's changed is that the government is now pushing automakers for rapid fuel economy improvements. The current 25 mpg average is supposed to hit 34.1 mpg by 2016, and 54.5 mpg by 2025.
OEMs will be using a wide variety of strategies to meet those goals -- the experts say electrification will be a big part of the equation.
But making vehicles lighter is also a high priority.
Tom Pilette, vice president of product and process development at Magna International Inc., said the OEMs he talks to now say their No. 1 priority is mass reduction.
Here are some more highlights from the conference today. Make sure to watch our Twitter page for updates throughout the event:
Maurice Sessel, senior vice president at International Automotive Components North America, said future vehicle designs may eliminate the crossbeam, a metal structural part under the instrument panel that accounts for 30 percent of the weight in a vehicle interior.
Sessel added that it will take close cooperation with OEMs to bring home new technology.
Magna's Pilette highlighted the company's extensive use of different materials, noting that Magna is materials agnostic. But he added that while the company is looking at applications for biomaterials, it won't step up their use until they are cost-neutral to customers.
Jay Baron, president and CEO of the Center for Automotive Research, said so-called "driverless technology" is technologically feasible now, and could be commercial by 2020. That's a trend being driven by the federal government too -- regulators want to create cars that won't crash, in order to reduce vehicle fatalities to zero.
There are materials implications to that push. For example, think of all the automotive parts that have to be steel or aluminum now in order to protect the driver and passengers in a crash. Now imagine that the car is designed to never crash...
Baron believes the future lightweight vehicle will be a mixed material product - not aluminum-intensive, steel-intensive or plastics-intensive.
Tom Gould, design director for North America for Johnson Controls Inc., says suppliers and OEMs need to collaborate to make lightweight vehicles.
That means bringing designers to the table. And once they're part of the team, push them to solve problems.
"That's what they're trained to do," he said. "Don't let them off the hook."
Likewise, Jim Tobin, chief marketing officer at Magna, said that to cut weight, suppliers need to use high tech expertise to deliver solutions that are affordable, environmentally friendly and reliable.
Is the CD about to go the way of 8-track tapes and disappear from music store shelves?
That's the word from music magazine Side Line. Its story, citing unnamed sources, says major music labels plan to eliminate music CDs by the end of 2012.
CDs would be replaced by downloads from iTunes and other music services. Only limited edition CDs would remain, and they would be sold primarily through Amazon.
"3 weeks ago we heard it for the first time and since then we have tried getting some feedback from EMI, Universal and Sony. All declined to comment," the story says.
Some readers seem pretty skeptical, but it's not completely unrealistic. As the story points out, CDs cost money to make, store, and recycle (when they go unsold). It must be tempting for music companies to believe they can eliminate all those costs.
According to Wikipedia, the first album to be released on CD was Billy Joel's 52nd Street, which was sold beginning Oct. 1, 1982, in Japan. CDs and CD players were released in the United States in eary 1983.
Remember Anderson? She spent 14 years at SPI. When she left, she was SPI's trade, economic and policy issues officer. Now she's at the Alexandria, Va.-based group that represents manufacturers, users and suppliers of on-premise sign equipment.
The Committee of 100 represents association members before the U.S. Chamber's board of directors, to enhance Chamber lobbying and coalition work, recommend programming, and strengthen outreach to the business and association community.
The other new members include:
Michael D. Bellaman, President and CEO, Associated Builders and Contractors
Gov. Matt Blunt, President, American Automotive Policy Council
Stephen Gold, President and CEO, Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI
Gov. Dirk Kempthorne, President and CEO, American Council of Life Insurers
Thomas E. Stenzel, President and CEO, United Fresh Produce Association
David H. Stevens, President and CEO, Mortgage Bankers Association
Susan B. Waters, EDM, CAE, President and CEO, National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors
Glancing at the list of current members, there are others with connections to plastics on the committee, including Cal Dooley of the American Chemistry Council.
"This Committee of 100 has a long-standing reputation as one of the most prestigious appointments in the association community," said Rob Engstrom, senior vice president of political affairs and federation relations. "These new members reflect our continued dedication to naming diverse, high-profile leaders to serve on this important committee."
The term "polyester slacks" might be not seem exactly cool or modern, but recycled PET just might help to make something old-fashioned seem new again.
According to our sister publication Advertising Age, 85-year-old Haggar Clothing Co., is preparing to launch an ad campaign for "Life Khaki" pants, which are made in part from recycled PET.
Ad Agesays the company is hoping the eco-friendly pants "will give it cachet with a younger consumer."
Using recycled PET to make polyester fabric isn't exactly new. But I've noticed a few companies highlighting the recycled content of the fabric used to make graduation gowns and soccer uniforms.
"CNN Reports" did a report on plastic bags yesterday that focused on marine debris.
Correspondent Amber Lyon starts the report in a boat off the coast of California, fishing for plastic bags. Then she dives beneath the surface to find more bags, and she talks to a veterinarian who has seen plastic bags in the stomachs of whales, sea lions and dolphins.
According to CNN, this is the first in a two-part report.
OK, this isn't a high-volume application for recycled plastics, but it's still pretty cool.
Jim Griffioen, a stay-at-home Dad in the Detroit area, has blogged about making his son's Halloween costumes the past couple of years, and taken shots in appropriate run-down Detroit locations.
Last year's RoboCop was made from an old bike helmet, laundry detergent bottles and "a bunch of plastic crap," among other items. Check out the link, you'll love the photos (and captions) of the little guy visiting with some of Detroit's finest.
This year, he's "The Rocketeer", with a helmet made from an old BMX helmet, the lenses out of an old pair of sunglasses and a piece of acrylic, along with a rocket pack made from two-liter soda bottles.
Super creative stuff.
Thanks to Rhoda Miel, Plastics News' staff reporter in Detroit, for contributing this item today -- and have a Happy Halloween.
Penn State Erie has officially opened its new Medical Plastics Center of Excellence, aimed at educating students and helping companies develop new medical devices and packaging.
The center held a grand opening ceremony on Oct. 26.
The center is located on the first floor of the Jack Burke Research and Economic Development Center, and it is adjacent to the school's 10,500-square-foot plastics processing facility.
It includes a medical plastics lab that features an ISO Class 8 clean room, a 55-ton liquid silicone injection molder, a materials compounding extruder, autoclave sterilization, and injection molding machines with clamping forces up to 200 tons.
"Our mission is to partner with companies to maximize medical device performance and lower the cost of healthcare," said Jason Williams, head of the Medical Plastics Center of Excellence, in a news release.
In this age of downloadable music, is it possible that vinyl records are experiencing even faster growth than the numbers indicate?
David Giffels wrote a story for The New York Times Magazine on a small vinyl record company in Cleveland, Gotta Groove Records. Giffels says the company is one of about 20 left in the United States that still press vinyl records.
According to the story, vinyl record makers are still enjoying a resurgence in interest from music fans. Last year, according to the story, 2.8 million vinyl records were sold in the United States, according to Nielsen Co., and this year's numbers are about 40 percent higher.
(The Recording Industry Association of America has different numbers -- 4 million LPs or EPs, up nearly 26 percent between 2009 and 2010, and about 300,000 vinyl singles, down about 4 percent).
But Giffels' source at Gotta Groove says the real sales figures for vinyl are much, much higher. Nielsen's estimate only gets about 15 percent of the total, Vince Slusarz said, because most vinyl records are sold in independent shops, at clubs and through websites.
"The majority of the stuff we press, it doesn't even have a bar code," Slusarz said.
To put it all in perspective, though, keep in mind that 225.8 million [polycarbonate] CDs were shipped in the United States in 2010, according to RIAA. And an estimated 1,16 billion singles and 83.1 million albums were downloaded in 2010.
Dow Chemical Co. is making a significant donation to universities with chemical engineering programs over the next decade -- $250 million.
According to The Wall Street Journal, a big part of the donation is aimed at helping chemical engineering to catch up to some faster-growing academic fields, including biomedical engineering.
In the last decade, according to the WSJ story, undergrad degrees in biomedical engineering more than tripled, to 3,670 per year, while undergrad degrees in chemical engineering were flat at 5,948 per year.
The trend is similar on the graduate degree level.
"We think the shift has gone too far," Theresa Kotanchek, a Dow vice president, told the newspaper.
Schools that will get funding include the California Institute of Technology; Carnegie Mellon; the Georgia Institute of Technology; Northwestern; Pennsylvania State; the University of California's Berkeley and Santa Barbara campuses, and the Universities of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, according to The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Today the Society of the Plastics Engineers Automotive Division named the finalists for its 41st annual awards competition. The winners will be announced Nov. 9.
Here are the finalists:
CATEGORY: Body Exterior
SPOILER WITH INTEGRATED ANTENNA & AMPLIFIER
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2011 MY Chevrolet Camaro convertible sports car
Tier Supplier/Processor: ABC Group - Exterior Systems
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Dow Automotive / ABC Group - Supreme Tooling
Material / Process: Pulse® 2000 EZ PC/ABS / Blow molding
Description: This is the first-ever integrated amplifier and antenna in a blow-molded spoiler. An innovative method was used to incorporate the antenna into and locate the amplifier in the spoiler. Not only were rear-vehicle aesthetics improved, but a 10% weight savings and 66% indirect cost savings were achieved.
STRUCTURAL ASA AERO SPOILER
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Edge & Lincoln MKT CUVs
Tier Supplier/Processor: ABC Group / Delta Tool
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC Innovative Plastics / Delta Tool
Material / Process: Geloy XP4034 ASA+PC / Gas-counter-pressure injection molding
Description: A patented chemical foaming agent combined w/ASA in a non-traditional injection molding process was used to mold this aero spoiler, which reduces weight 1.5 lb / vehicle (for better fuel economy) and better meets customer requirements. The design allowed for parts integration while maintaining a Class A surface appearance and saving $5.6MM USD direct costs and an estimated $200,000 of indirect costs due to reduced complexity vs. the previous process.
RAM BOX ASSEMBLY WITH LID
OEM Make & Model: Chrysler Group LLC 2012 MY Dodge Ram pickup
Tier Supplier/Processor: Penda Corp. / Penda Corp. (lid), Evco Plastics (bin), River Bend Industries (end caps)
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Asahi Kasei Plastics North America Inc. / Cavalier Tool & Mfg. Ltd. (injection molded bin); Tooling Technology LLC (thermoformed lid)
Description: Twin-sheet thermoforming replaces blow molding to create the structure and ribbing of this tough storage box with lid. The result is a more uniform, more dimensionally accurate part whose length was increased from 5 ft 7 in. to 6 ft 4 in., requiring greater emphasis on the "heavy-duty" nature of the structure's design and materials of construction. A special new grade of GR-PP eliminated the need to upgrade to heavier and more costly PA 6/6, avoiding a 9% weight and 20% cost increase.
CATEGORY: Body Interior
SECOND-ROW VANITY MIRROR & DOME LAMP WITH DUAL LED
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2013 MY Lincoln Town Car livery
Tier Supplier/Processor: Daimay NA Automotive, Inc. / Not Stated
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Not Stated / Not Stated
Material / Process: PC/ABS / Not stated
Description: This second-row vanity and dome lamp combo shares a single LED circuit board to serve both vanity and courtesy/reading light functions. Additional features include a light ramp-up intensity feature to provide a luxury feel for Lincoln customers. Molded-in-hooks and snaps on the back of the vanity bezel helped eliminate 4 J-clips, 4 high-retention clips, 4 screws and screw caps, plus labor during vehicle assembly. The resulting system saves 2.02 lb / vehicle vs. previous systems and saved $4/unit direct and $8/vehicle indirect costs vs. separately packaged units.
SEAT-CONTROLS PLASTIC-MODULE BRACKET
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Escape SUV / Kuga SUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Magna Seating LVSS / Genesis
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: BASF Corp. / ETCS Inc.
Material / Process: Ultramid A3WG6 PA 6/6 30% GF / Injection molding
Description: This plastic module bracket for seat controls replaced a steel stamping manufactured in progressive dies with an injection-molded 30% glass-reinforced PA 6/6 material. The approach saves 805 g of weight per vehicle vs. the previous design and only is required on 31% of seats whereas the previous design was used on 100% of seats, reducing the number of parts that must be managed, controlled, and installed and lowering the potential for failure modes. Further, it reduces parts from 2 to 1 and increases design frequency from 30 Hz to 61 Hz, eliminating potential NVH issues via a tripod mounting approach with honeycomb construction. It also eliminated $260,000 in tooling costs and piece-costs were reduced $0.15/set.
OVERMOLD-CUSHION SUSPENSION
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Escape SUV & Kuga CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Flex-O-Lators Div. of Leggett & Platt Inc.
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Washington Penn / Advanced Mold Engineering Inc.
Material / Process: PPC5UF0 PP / Injection molding
Description: The injection-molded PP design reduces part count from 6 to 1 / seat, piece cost $0.56 per seat, tooling costs $288,000, and per-vehicle mass by 1.93 kg vs. the previous design. The single-piece design provides wire harness routing and retention, seat-cushion and back-trim retention, and climate-control system retention - functionality that previously required 6 parts to achieve. Now there are 5 fewer parts to manage, control, and install and fewer opportunities for potential failure modes.
CATEGORY: Chassis / Hardware
PLASTIC RATCHETING-STUD INSERT
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2012 MY Chevrolet Camaro sports car
Tier Supplier/Processor: ITW Super Products / ITW Shanghai
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Mitsubishi Engineering Plastics / Donglei Shanghai
Material / Process: Lupital F20-03 POM / Injection molding
Description: This all-plastic, self-centering ratcheting insert replaces metal nuts and allows for a much quicker load / hold (vs. traditional nut / bolt). The POM insert also acts as an isolator to protect the assembly from corrosion, paint chipping, and noise while achieving over 100 lb in pull-force retention. Weight is also reduced 50% and assembly time and warranty costs are reduced.
OUTER BELT WEATHERSTRIP HIDDEN FASTENER RETENTION
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2011 MY Ford All Focus compact cars (globally)
Tier Supplier/Processor: Henniges Automotive / MANUFACTURAS MAHER II, S.L .
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: BASF Corp. / Camoplast Inc.
Material / Process: Ultramid polyamide 6/6 / Injection molding
Description: The outer belt weatherstrip eliminates a threaded steel fastener and utilizes a plastic clip retainer. This is industry's first injection-molded plastic output pinion, which ensures functionality for 6-way locating with just 1 clip. Tough PA 6/6 provides robustness for impact resistance and holding force even after heat aging and high-pressure car washing. The application led to a 70% weight reduction, direct cost savings of $850,000 annually and an indirect savings of $450,000 each year.
POWER-WINDOW MOTOR OUTPUT GEAR & SHAFT
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2011 MY Ford All Focus compact cars (globally)
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: DuPont Automotive / Camoplast Inc.
Material / Process: Hytrel TPC-ET polyester / Injection molding
Description: This power-window motor changed from a steel output pinion to a new injection-molded polyester one for a quieter/lighter motor to meet customer targets while still complying with window velocities. It is industry's first plastic output pinion that ensures functionality. Additionally, the design allows for regulator plug-'n-play capability into the power drum for better motion control. Packaging of the involute onto the spline gear to the accommodating drum spline was critical to the customer. The application saved $450,000 USD direct and $250,000 indirect cost savings annually
CATEGORY: Environmental
RECYCLED MATERIALS FROM GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILL
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2011 MY Chevrolet Volt extended-range EV
Tier Supplier/Processor: GDC Inc. / Not Stated
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Mobile Fluid Recovery, Inc. / Not Stated
Material / Process: Enduraprene 2395 PP/PE/SBR / Multiple
Description: This project demonstrates how engineers came to aid the Gulf of Mexico coast community to improve the response efforts to the oil spill and to conserve resources. Air-baffle components were molded from 100%-recycled material comprised of 25% PP Gulf oil-boom absorbent (recycled previously from automotive waste), 25% Milford Proving Ground test tires, and 25% polymer packaging aids from other General Motors' facilities, plus 25% post consumer PE bottles.
LOADFLOOR USING COCONUT FELT NAME
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Focus BEV
Description: This loadfloor uses coconut fiber agricultural waste for reinforcement of the polymer matrix. The coir fibers are carded and needle punched to create a mat and then calendared inline to achieve the desired thickness before being die-cut to shape and assembled with other components. This provides income to farmers and reuses a waste material that otherwise would have little market usefulness.
BIO-FOAM FOR INSTRUMENT PANEL
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Focus compact car
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: BASF Corp. / Not Stated
Material / Process: Elastofoam Balance 27730 & 27731 PUR foam / Foam in place
Description: The use of bio-based components for the polyurethane foam in this application provides a partially sustainable alternative to conventional urethanes with 100% petroleum inputs. By reducing petroleum-based content, the carbon footprint of vehicles is reduced, thanks to the CO2 sequestering plants do during their growth cycle. The bio-foam also provides softness for this foam-in-place application, which required no tooling changes and was cost neutral.
REDUCED-VOC HYDROGRAPHICS
OEM Make & Model: Chrysler Group LLC 2011 MY Chrysler 300 luxury sedan
Description: The supplier's proprietary E-Cubic process eliminates the need for top coating and reduces VOCs vs. conventional hydrographics, paint, and in-mold film use while providing unique decorating features, including dual gloss levels and 3D texturing.
RENEWABLY SOURCED PA FOR BIODIESEL FUEL LINES
OEM Make & Model: Fiat S.p.A. 2011 MY Fiat Diesel engines, various models
Tier Supplier/Processor: Hutchinson
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: DuPont Automotive / Not Stated
Material / Process: Zytel RS 1610 PA 10/10 / Extrusion
Description: This is the first automotive use of PA 10/10 and the first bio-based PA 10/10 application. It is used in a diesel fuel line replacing PA 12. The bio-based resin provides superior temperature and chemical resistance, as well as heat-aging performance in biodiesel fuel blends vs. PA 12. This specific composition also contains a minimum of 60% bio content by weight for a more sustainable solution.
CATEGORY: Materials
VOLCANIC-FILLER PILLAR TRIM
OEM Make & Model: Hyundai-Kia Automotive Group 2011 MY Kia Pride subcompact & Optima mid-size sedan and Hyundai Elantra compact car
Tier Supplier/Processor: Plakor Co. Ltd.
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Hyundai EP Co. Ltd. / Not Stated
Material / Process: Supol HL345CL PP / Injection molding
Description: This lightweight, injection-molded PP pillar trim provides the texture and appearance of more costly fabric-wrapped trim through use of a unique filler combination consisting of volcanic rock, fiber pile, and glass spheres replacing talc-filled PP and fabric-wrapped PP. No special tooling was required but process control was important so as not to crush the glass spheres and to distribute the fiber pile evenly during compounding and molding. A 10% weight and a 50% direct cost savings was achieved. Other benefits gained from using the volcanic mineral are that it emits negative ions (to reduce pollutants) and far-infrared energy.
TRANSMISSION COMPONENTS IN FLUOROELASTOMERS
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2011 MY All GM Vehicles using 6L45, 6L50, 6L80, & 6L90 transmissions
Tier Supplier/Processor: Robert Bosch LLC / Freudenberg-NOK
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Freudenberg-NOK / Freudenberg-NOK
Material / Process: FluoroXprene B FKM & ETFE / Injection molding
Description: Replacing both injection molded PA and conventional rubber, a new multi-patented fluoropolymer offers the chemical resistance of FKM with the rapid processing of thermoplastics. It also provides excellent compression set over the range of application temperatures, good permeation and fluid resistance vs. traditional fluorinated TPVs and TPEs, while solving a warranty issue and preventing seal failure, which can lead to electrical shorts. The unique 2-phase morphology of the material allows the ratio to be manipulated to produce either TPV or TPE formulations. Zero-waste, single-cavity direct injection leads to no scrap.
EP BIO-BASED POLYESTER POLYMER
OEM Make & Model: Toyota Motor Co. 2011 MY Toyota Prius "A" Alpha station wagon
Tier Supplier/Processor: Kojima Press Industry Co., Ltd. / Howa Plastics Co., Ltd.
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: DuPont Automotive / Not Stated
Material / Process: Sorona EP 2045 PTT / Not stated
Description: This is the first use of polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), an entirely new thermoplastic polyester that also happens to be bio-based. This high-temperature thermoplastic polyester delivers improved performance (vs. PBT and PET), including higher stiffness and strength, higher use temperature but lower melt temperature at a lower specific gravity. Despite the fact that it contains 45% glass, it provides excellent surface finish, allowing elimination of a paint operation and the VOC and costs associated with painting. In addition, its bio-based content provides for CO2 reduction and a more sustainable solution.
CATEGORY: Powertrain
PLASTIC TRANSMISSION ACCUMULATOR PISTON
OEM Make & Model: Chrysler Group LLC 2012 MY All Chrysler Vehicles with Automatic Transmissions
Tier Supplier/Processor: Chrysler Group LLC / Freudenberg-NOK Sealing Technologies
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Chevron-Phillips Chemical Co. LLC / Freudenberg-NOK Sealing Technologies
Material / Process: Ryton R-Y-120 PPS / Injection molding
Description: This molded plastic transmission accumulator piston was designed around the current application so that the bore, seal rings, and return springs did not have to be changed and it was a drop-in replacement. Maximum effort went into material choice (PPS) and model shape to achieve the appropriate toughness to handle time, temperature, pressure, and combined cycling to create a 200,000-mile capable piston. The resulting part is 29 g vs. typical 47 g for aluminum pistons. A direct thermoplastic injection technology was developed to produce the parts, resulting in zero material waste through the use of a single-cavity design. The process allowed for a 33% improvement in cycle times and reduces the total floor space required by 20% over previous multi-cavity processes. The change in philosophy also eliminated the need for material regrind / reclamation equipment and lowered total capital expenditures. The innovative approach used here has allowed for a modular business cell that is adaptable to large market-volume fluctuations.
NI-MH BATTERY PACKAGE FOR HEV
OEM Make & Model: Volkswagen AG 2010 MY Volkswagen® Touareg® hybrid CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Sanyo Electric / Not Stated
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC Innovative Plastics / Not Stated
Material / Process: Noryl SE100P M-PPE / Injection molding
Description: Injection molded modified-PPE resin was used for this compact Ni-MH battery module package, providing greater dimensional accuracy than glass-reinforced PBT and lower weight vs. glass-reinforced PPE/PS. The resulting assembly is 50% lighter than it would have been in competitive GR-PBT and 10% lighter than GR-PPE/PS, making it the best material choice for the required properties at low weight.
BATTERY PACK
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2011 MY Chevrolet Volt extended-range EV
Tier Supplier/Processor: General Motors Co. / MANN+HUMMEL GmbH
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: BASF Corp. / Omega Corp.
Material / Process: Ultramid 1503-2F PA 6/6 33% GF, HS / Injection molding
Description: Thermoplastic battery frames are an integral part of electric-vehicle thermal management, channeling coolant to and from the cells. The use of injection-molded hydrolysis-resistant PA 6/6 for thermal-cycling management is a lightweight enabling material for this design, which required exacting manufacturing consistency and high levels of repeatability and reproducibility.
CATEGORY: Process / Assembly / Enabling Technologies
INTEGRATED LIFTGATE TRIM GRAB HANDLE
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford Focus compact hatchback
Tier Supplier/Processor: NYX Inc.
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Not Stated / Aalbers Tool
Material / Process: PP / Injection molding
Description: Through design and tooling innovations, the injection-molded polypropylene liftgate grab handle was molded in a single piece vs. previous 2-piece assemblies thanks to 3 large cavity-side slides in the tool. The innovation saved 0.1 lb and $0.60 USD / vehicle.
COMPOSITE WHEEL WEIGHTS
OEM Make & Model: General Motors Co. 2011 MY Cadillac CTS sedan & Corvette sports car
Tier Supplier/Processor: ESYS Automation / 3M
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: 3M / ESYS Automation
Material / Process: 3M proprietary / Extrusion
Description: This innovation uses extrusion of a highly filled polymer and automation equipment to provide significant product flexibility and performance improvements that, for the first time, enable fully automated tire balance weight installation. Replacing stamped, painted steel parts that required manual installation, and reducing the SKUs from 24 to 1, the innovation uses large spools of wheel weights in tape form with an adhesive backing that can be automatically cut and applied very accurately to reduce labor, scrap, application cycles, and an average of 0.3-0.5 grams of excess weight per wheel.
MUCELL INSTRUMENT PANEL
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2012 MY Ford® Escape® compact SUV & Kuga® compact CUV
Material / Process: Stamax EXRP-49 30YK270 & AP3335-HF long glass / 30% talc-filled PP / Microcellular injection molding
Description: This is the largest automotive component molded in the patented MuCell injection-molding process and the first instrument panel to be molded in this process. By creating the part in microcellular foam, weight is reduced over 1 lb, mechanicals are improved, cycle time is reduced 10%, and clamp tonnage is reduced 45%, saving an estimated $2 / vehicle vs. solid injection molding.
CATEGORY: Safety
REINFORCED AIRBAG LID IN FOAM (RALF)
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2011 MY Ford Focus compact car
Tier Supplier/Processor: Faurecia Interior Systems
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: Not stated / Not stated
Material / Process: PET & PUR / Not stated
Description: RALF technology is an optimized instrument panel / passenger airbag door system that uses a reinforced structural 3D-skeleton of PET mesh textile and polyurethane foam lid. RALF replaces the traditional metal or plastic airbag lid door and offers much improved airbag lid positioning with less risk of windshield breakage. It offers significant weight savings over traditional foam-in-place airbag construction and is cost-neutral.
UNDERTRAY WITH PEDESTRIAN-SAFETY FUNCTIONALITY
OEM Make & Model: Ford Motor Co. 2011 MY Ford C-Max world car
Tier Supplier/Processor: Faurecia
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC Innovative Plastics / Not stated
Material / Process: Xenoy iQ1103R PC/PBT / Injection molding
Description: The undertray structure was uniquely designed with "spring-back action" to help the vehicle achieve a Euro-NCAP 5 Star rating while eliminating the need for a separate lower spoiler, saving 1.5-2.0 kg of weight and $10-15 in extra cost. The lightweight corrugated structure incorporates other functional requirements, including air guides for air intake to cool the tower assembly and to meet stone chipping requirements. The PC/PBT resin used to injection mold this part is upcycled from post-consumer plastic waste, reducing landfill burden and hydrocarbon-fuel consumption while providing excellent impact resistance.
PEDESTRIAN-SAFETY UPPER LOAD PATH
OEM Make & Model: Range Rover 2011 MY Range Rover Evoque CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Magna International Inc.
Material Supplier / Toolmaker: SABIC Innovative Plastics / Not Stated
Material / Process: Xenoy iQ1103R PC/PBT / Injection molding
Description: This 1-piece injection-molded fascia reinforcement eliminates the need for support brackets and offers tuned stiffness to control lower-leg kinematics during pedestrian impact with this cross-over utility vehicle (CUV). The fascia reinforcement, also tuned for pedestrian protection, eliminates the need for an additional energy absorber in front of the bumper beam. Good lateral rigidity and creep behavior minimizes sag during sun load. Molded-in air intake guides bring cooling air to the intercooler. The upcycled PC/PBT material used in this application is reclaimed from post-consumer plastic waste, reducing landfill burden and hydrocarbon fuel needs. The application reduced weight 20% by eliminating the metal bracket. Another 0.5-1.0 kg of weight was saved by eliminating the need for the foam energy absorber.
For more information about the SPE Automotive Innovation Awards Competition and Gala, visit the SPE Automotive Division website.
The town of Sioux Lookout in northwest Ontario is bucking a trend -- it just decided to reverse a ban on plastic bags.
Bryan Meadows of The Chronicle Journal in Thunder Bay, Ontario, reports today that the town council removed the 4-month-old ban on single-use plastic bags because of opposition from the community.
"We had a whole pile of petitions from business people and up to 400 names of private citizens" who opposed ban, Mayor Dennis Leney told the newspaper. "It was pretty unanimous that people were not happy with it."
The law had not been fully implemented -- it took effect this summer, but there was a one-year phase-in period.
Sioux Lookout had been the first municipality in Ontario to ban plastic bags, according to the report.
What's this -- a community rolling back a bag ban without a lawsuit? I'm not sure Plastics Blog readers in the United States will be able to relate to this story.
Bill Carteaux, president of the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. in Washington,was present today when President Obama formally signed into law legislation for the South Korea, Colombia and Panama free-trade agreements.
Here's a photo of Carteaux at the Rose Garden ceremony. Carteaux and Jon Kurrle, SPI's senior vice president for government and industry affairs were part of a group of business leaders who joined Obama after the bills were signed in the Oval Office.
"I am honored to be invited to the White House to celebrate these trade agreements because SPI's advocacy team, aided by our dedicated members, worked countless hours and made, literally, hundreds of Capitol Hill visits in support of these agreements," Carteaux said in a statement prepared prior to the ceremony.
"I know I will feel proud and have a real sense of accomplishment because the signing ceremony will represent the end result of a long advocacy process that involves being engaged with Congress from the start and making sure our industry's collective voice is heard. SPI has long-supported these pro-growth measures and they create a more level playing field for the U.S. plastics industry and increases our competitiveness in these three countries."
The trade agreements eliminate the barriers U.S. exporters face in these three markets. SPI released these plastics-relevant facts about the deals and the markets:
The U.S. International Trade Commission has estimated that the U.S.-South Korea FTA alone will generate $10 to $11 billion in additional exports, and every additional $1 billion dollars in exports creates 6,000 jobs.
South Korea is the 10th largest export market for U.S. plastics. Since 2000, plastics exports to South Korea have increased by 44 percent.
Colombia is the 16th largest export market for U.S. plastics. Since 2000, plastics exports to Colombia have increased by 163 percent.
Although not presently a top market for the U.S. plastics industry, Panama has shown tremendous growth potential as well. Since 2000, plastics exports to Panama have increased by 107 percent.
Here's a copy of a video of Obama's remarks, where he mentions the plastics industry's interest in the trade deals:
"For single-use bags, it is a double whammy: the pass-through cost from the retailers, as well as the cost of dealing with billions of discarded plastic bags in our landfills, sewers, gutters, parks, trees, rivers, beaches and oceans. We all pay for the estimated 1.2 billion to 2.3 billion (yes, billion) single-use plastic bags and 400 million paper bags used each year in the city, whether we know it or not," the column says.
I wonder about the accuracy of an estimate with such a wide range -- 1.2 billion to 2.3 billion. But that's not my problem with the column.
Take a look at this part:
The most pervasive argument against the ban of single-use bags is that doing so kills jobs at companies that produce plastic bags. That doesn't make sense when you consider reusable bags are often made from plastic. And shoppers won't stop needing bags to carry their purchases, though it's true they won't need as many.
In fact, some forward-thinking companies have already jumped on the opportunity to make reusable bags, creating jobs that didn't exist before. That includes the Van Nuys-based company, Green Bag America, which makes private-label reusable shopping bags for retailers.
So it's OK to kill jobs at companies that make one kind of plastic bags because there are other companies making other bags willing to step in and create jobs "that didn't exist before"?
That's a pretty big leap in logic.
My other example comes from The News-Herald in Willoughby, Ohio, which did a lengthy feature story on college campuses that are banning sales of single-serve water bottles.
My problem here is the focus on bottled water. I don't have concerns about drinking water from public fountains, I do it almost every day.
But I know many people avoid drinking fountains -- some for health and safety reasons, some for taste. If colleges ban bottled water, don't they end up encouraging people to buy less healthy alternative drinks? That's not their aim, but it's a logical result.
And aren't college campuses prime spots for recycling empty bottles?
I don't have a problem with policies that encourage people to use less stuff. That includes giving out fewer single-use bags at stores, and encouraging customers to use reusable bags, or to reuse and recycle single-use bags.
But making the leap from encouraging people to use less stuff and legally requiring it is a pretty big jump.
This sounds like a candidate for one of former Sen. William Proxmire's Golden Fleece awards: Researchers at Kassel University in Germany have developed a polyurethane toy for pigs to play with to help release their aggression.
The "Wühlkegel," (translation: "rooting cone"), a PU ball on a spring, is designed to relieve boredom and inactivity among captive pigs in order to improve animal welfare.
According to a report from Urethanes Technology International, researchers at the university carried out the $276,000 project along with the German federal ministry of food, agriculture and consumer protection.
The toys are currently being tested -- pigs' behavior is being monitored on video. Researchers said in a university statement that they are optimistic the project will be successful, especially as European legal requirements regarding the quality of toys for pigs are due to become stricter in the next years.
Will Microsoft's sustainability goals impact plastics suppliers?
Add Microsoft Corp.'s suppliers to the growing list of companies that are going to have to keep track of -- and report -- data on their environmental records.
Yesterday the company announced that starting in 2013, it will require "a cross section" of its suppliers to provide reports on how they adhere to Microsoft's Vendor Code of Conduct.
That could have some specific plastics-related implications.
Bort writes that Microsoft's policy might push suppliers like Dell Inc. to accelerate efforts to move away from PVC and brominated flame retardants.
"One of the policies in Microsoft's code of conduct is: 'If applicable, identify the chemicals or other materials being released that pose a threat to the environment and manage them appropriately to ensure their safe handling, movement, storage, use, recycling or reuse, and disposal,'" Bort wrote.
"Greenpeace has been after Dell for years to cut the dangerous chemicals out of its electronics manufacturing."
Microsoft's proposal is a response to a shareholder proposal received from New York City Comptroller John C. Liu on behalf of the New York City Pension Funds.
Today the American Chemistry Council announced that it has created a new American Chemistry Matters blog where it can "highlight and respond to news coverage and discuss relevant policy issues and their effect on innovation, competitiveness, job creation and safety."
ACC says the blog will have daily updates written by staff members including President and CEO Cal Dooley.
"As stakeholders increasingly turn to the internet for information, it's important that the central role of chemistry in our economy and in making modern life possible be part of the conversation," Dooley wrote in a news release today.
Many of the posts are plastics-specific, including today's from Steve Russell, ACC's vice president of plastics.
For 27 years, experts have been citing this statistic: that plastic debris kills 100,000 marine animals a year. And it turns out that no one really knows whether the number was ever accurate.
The research today comes from Harold Johnson, a Saco, Maine, journalist and author of The Flotsam Diaries blog.
Johnson, who's outspoken of his criticism of the plastics industry, was nonetheless skeptical of the number, which he wrote "keeps cropping up, on personal blogs, nonprofit Web sites, popular scientific eZines, press releases."
(Plastics News has mentioned the number a few times, most prominently in coverage of a 2006 conference on plastic debris and the oceans.)
"It's too round. Too easy. Too 'everywhere.' The vanilla ice cream of heartstring-tugging environmentalism," Johnson wrote.
So he set out to find the source -- and determine if it's worth repeating.
It turns out that it's not.
Johnson's research took him all the way back to a December 1984 story from The New York Times, "Deadly Tide of Plastic Waste Threatens World's Oceans and Aquatic Life." The story cited its source: a report from a group called The Entanglement Network at a November 1984 Workshop on the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris in Honolulu.
The Entanglement Network's report itself, from the conference's proceedings (PDF) does not cite the 100,000 figure.
"And just like that, I had the answer," Johnson wrote. "A 'fact' handed down & bandied about from article to nonprofit, conservation society to international organization, over years and years. So long that it has taken a life of its own, and becomes unquestioned, and unsourced. Whether there is -- or was -- any science behind it remains in doubt."
And, as he points out, even if it was accurate in 1984, it's out of date.
Marine debris is clearly a significant problem. But it is a magnet for hyperbole. We've seen that before in descriptions of the North Pacific Central Gyre that imply it is an actual floating island. And we've seen other exaggerated reports on the threats to marine life.
As Johnson wrote today, just because you see a 'fact' in 100 places, doesn't make it true.
But don't be surprised if, a year from now, you see it another 100 times.
At daily newspapers, editors know stories about dogs or ice cream belong on Page 1. Readers love 'em.
But in the world of plastics journalism, we rarely get the opportunity.
So imagine the reaction today to a news release from PolyOne GLS Thermoplastic Elastomers that combines both. I can't resist sharing their feature on the Happy Lapper, a dish designed to help dogs eat ice cream without making a mess.
(Aren't the best new products just solutions to problems we didn't know we had?)
The material -- a 60 Shore A durometer thermoplastic elastomer from PolyOne GLS. The TPE resin is FDA compliant and is soft enough to grip most types of flooring without tipping over.
Finally, the customer is Linda Haverstock, founder of Dillsburg, Pa.-based Pup Peeves.
PolyOne GLS's Rick Noller cites the Happy Lapper as an example of collaboration involving a molder, a material supplier and a customer.
No mention, unfortunately, of the key role played by man's best friend.
It can be fun to see what others think about plastics. For some really creative takes, check out these videos created by college students in plastics and plastics engineering programs.
The contest was created to celebrate SPI's 75th anniversary. College students (undergraduate and graduate level) studying in plastics programs were invited to submit original videos that honor plastics' innovation.
First Prize is an iPad2, a $2,000 check and a three-day trip to NPE 2012 in Orlando, Fla.
What's your favorite? I laughed at a few, including "Life without plastics" and "Plastics cab" (inspired by the TV game show "Cash cab," which I suppose will be an iconic program for this generation like "The Dating Game" or "The Gong Show" was to mine).
Some were quite creative. "The True Meaning of Plastics" uses some neat cartoon artwork, for example.
Take a look and enjoy all the entries. SPI is preparing to announce the finalists -- maybe we can treat this like our own plasticky Oscar pool.
Plastics notes from Reckitt Benckiser's sustainability report
Reckitt Benckiser plc, known for its Clearasil, Lysol, Durex and Woolite brands, among others, released its 2010 sustainability report today. Here are some of the plastics-related highlights:
The company's very proud of that eliminated all the PVC packaging from its household products by the end of 2009. The step is highlighted in big blue letters on page 3 of the report (downloadable here), and on top of the company's news release.
It notes, however, that "Healthcare products are excluded from this target as no viable alternatives have yet been identified for some healthcare applications."
Under the category of "material use," the company notes several plastics-related innovations:
In 2010 a packaging redesign introduced an all-plastic trigger in the North American market. This will eliminate more than 198 metric tons of stainless steel a year. Since it is mainly polypropylene resin, it is also widely compatible with US recycling streams.
We have also made progress with 'light weighting' in North America, most notably on the Lysol Dual Action Wipes, Lysol Spray, and Lysol 32oz cleaners. This has avoided more than 290 metric tons of resin usage and reduced our carbon emissions by 920 metric tons.
Small savings can make a big impact In Europe we have changed the dosing scoop for Vanish powder from an injection moulded scoop to a thermoformed scoop. This change in manufacturing technology has reduced the weight by nearly 50% resulting in 153 tons of PP resin saved. As the thermoforming process requires much less energy than injection moulding this project also saved around 638 metric tons of CO2.
Actually, PP caps aren't widely recycled in the United States, although there's growing interest among recyclers and cap makers.
Americans are becoming much more confident with their knowledge about the environment, according to a new survey commissioned by SC Johnson.
That's despite the often confusing or even contradictory messages that they receive on many environmental issues, from global warming to the benefits of paper vs. plastic bags.
This poll isn't specifically about plastics, but I expect it will be studied carefully -- and quoted extensively -- in the coming year.
According to the survey, 73 percent of Americans say they know a lot or fair amount about environmental issues and problems. That's up 20 percentage points since 1995.
Also, fewer people now agree with the statement "I am very confused about what's good and what's bad for the environment." Just 18 percent agreed with that statement in 2011, down a whopping 21 percentage points since 1990.
A growing number of respondents say they've made lifestyle changes that have a positive environmental impact. For example, 58 percent said they recycle on a regular basis -- twice as many as 20 years ago -- and 29 percent said they buy "green" products.
Click here (PDF) for a copy of the full report, "The Environment: Public Attitudes and Individual Behavior -- A Twenty-Year Evolution."
Let's say you're on the city council of a coastal community where many residents are concerned about marine debris. Some of your constituents want to ban single-use plastic bags.
But if you pass a ban without first doing an expensive study on the environmental impact of the decision, you'll face a lawsuit -- and the prospect of an expensive legal battle.
That's the dilemma that communities in California face now, following the California Supreme Court's recent decision in the Manhattan Beach plastic bag lawsuit.
Last week, for example, the Save the Plastic Bag Coalition said it would ask the First District California Court of Appeal to overturn a bag ban in unincorporated areas of Marin County.
(Also, in a related move, yesterday Hilex Poly Co. LLC announced that it will be part of a lawsuit against the County of Los Angeles in response to a ban on plastic bags and a tax on paper bags.)
Now Huntington Beach is taking a slightly different approach. The community says it will look at a plastic bag ban. But it wants environmental groups to pay for the expensive study.
According to The Orange County Register, the Huntington Beach City Council voted 4-3 yesterday to pay Rincon Consulting nearly $30,000 to prepare an environmental impact report
The Surfrider Foundation has already given the city $3,000 for the study, and it plans to raise the rest of the money -- plus funding to copy and disseminate the report.
The newspaper quotes Surfrider Foundation member Bill Hickman: "Think of this as an investment, not a cost to the city. ... Recycling is not the answer for plastic bags. [Less than] 10 percent are recycled."
For a few years now, the Surfriders group has been a serious player in debates about plastics bags and litter, especially in California.
The decision to pay for Huntington Beach's environmental impact report will be an interesting test of how much support the group has, and whether its clout can eventually spread to other communities.
Brazilian plastics giant Braskem SA is now the largest polypropylene resin supplier in the United States. Today the company closed on its $323 million purchase of Dow Chemical Co.'s PP business.
The deal which was first announced July 27, includes two U.S. plants and two in Germany, with total annual capacity of 2.3 billion pounds.
Mark Nikolich, formerly VP of commercial and supply chain for Braskem America, has been named CEO and general manager of Braskem Europe GmbH.
Robert Nadin, formerly VP of innovation and technology for Braskem America, has been appointed VP of commercial and supply chain for polypropylene in North America.
As Plastics News' Frank Esposito has reported, this deal comes at an interesting time for the North American PP market, which has been rocked this year by extreme price volatility.
Increased use of natural gas feedstocks has reduced the amount of propylene monomer available to make PP in the region. Natural gas-based ethane feedstocks make less propylene per unit than do feedstocks based on crude oil-based naphtha.
The supply-demand situation got even more interesting earlier this month, when Phillips Sumika Polypropylene Co. announced it was closing its 700 million pound-per-year PP resin plant in Pasadena, Texas.
Plastics pioneer Eric Ross donates $17m to Holocaust museum
Eric Ross, who founded a Newark, N.J., company that eventually became compounder AlphaGary Corp., never forgot his roots as a Jewish refugee from Nazi Germany.
Ross, who died a year ago at age 91, was a longtime supporter of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Earlier this week, the museum announced that it received a $17.2 million gift from Ross -- the largest in the institution's history.
Ross and the plastics industry go back a pretty far. He apprenticed at a rubber company in Germany before the war. He fled Germany in 1938, eventually making his way to America.
"Most of his family, including his parents, never got out. He arrived here not knowing English and with no money," a friend, Rabbi Clifford M. Kulwin of Temple B'nai Abraham in Livingston, N.J., wrote. "He collected used tires for scrap and began in a menial position in a chemical business. Compared to him, Horatio Alger heroes had it easy."
After a stint in the U.S. Army, Ross got a foot in the still-fledgling PVC sector in 1950, when he started Alpha Chemical & Plastics in Newark, N.J.
Ross was a pioneer in using PVC in medical devices, working with customer C.R. Bard, according to this excellent history of Alpha Chemical from Newark's The Star-Ledger newspaper.
In 1985 he sold the company to Dexter Inc., starting a string of changes and new owners for the company. Some of the most noteable: Alpha merged with Leominster, Mass.-based Gary Corp. in 1994, and Mexichem SAB de CV bought the whole company earlier this year.
In retirement, Ross and his wife, Lore, were active supporters of the Holocaust museum. In 2003, President George W. Bush appointed Ross to the United States Holocaust Memorial Council.
Over the years, the couple donated more than $30 million to the museum.
"Having experienced firsthand Nazi antisemitism and hatred, Eric and Lore Ross became determined and generous investors in Holocaust education," Museum Director Sara J. Bloomfield said earlier this week. "Their loss and suffering inspired remarkable generosity."
I'm happy to share the story with you today, it seems particularly appropriate during the Rosh Hashanah holiday. L'Shanah Tovah, Tikatevu!
Q I'm from Austin, Texas. I've been in sales in the plastics industry for 20 years. I lost my job in 2009 and fortunate enough to have found another position, become reemployed. My question is what can we do as American citizens to unite ourselves and help the economy?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, are you a native of Austin? Because that's one of my favorite cities in the country.
Q Actually, I'm a native of Charlotte, North Carolina, but just relocated to Austin, and I love it there.
THE PRESIDENT: Austin is great. Charlotte is not bad. (Laughter.)
Q Thank you, thank you, thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: That's the reason why I'm having my convention in Charlotte, because I love North Carolina as well. But how long did it take you to find a new job after you had gotten laid off?
Q It took nine months.
THE PRESIDENT: It took nine months?
Q Yes, sir.
THE PRESIDENT: And that's one of the challenges that a lot of folks are seeing out there. You've got skilled people with experience in an industry. That industry changes, and you were fortunate enough to be able to move. Some folks, because of the decline in the housing industry, are having trouble with mobility in finding new jobs and relocating in pursuit of opportunity.
(... From there Obama made a pitch for his American Jobs Act ... read the transcript for the full plug.)
Is anyone surprised that a plastics industry executive would get the first question today? Considering how scripted something like a Town Hall meeting with the President can be, I'm sure nothing is left to chance.
Here's an odd twist to the plastic marine debris problem: your laundry may be a major source of microscopic plastic particles found in the ocean.
Until now, litter and spilled pellets have received most of the attention. But according to Clothing Sheds Microplastics Into Sea, from Chemical & Engineering News, synthetic fabrics are a major -- if often overlooked -- source.
According to the story, researchers from University College Dublin collected samples of microplastics from 18 coastal sites around the world.
The particles' shapes and sizes indicated they were fibers of synthetic fabrics. The researchers used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to determine the fibers' chemical composition. They found that polyester made up about three-quarters of the plastics; the rest consisted of polyamide, polypropylene, and acrylic, a composition that matches that of textiles.
The spectroscopy data led the team to think of washing clothes. So the researchers analyzed the water drained from frontloading washing machines after throwing fleece jackets, blankets, and synthetic business shirts into them. In one wash cycle, they found, a single piece of clothing shed more than 1,900 tiny fibers.
The scientists also determined that the chemical composition of their coastal plastic samples matched that of microscopic plastic found in treated discharge they collected from two wastewater treatment plants in Australia. [Researcher Mark Anthony] Browne and his team concluded that plastic fragments from synthetic fabrics most likely flow from wastewater treatment plants down to the seashore, and perhaps out to sea.
If other researchers confirm the findings, it will be interesting to see if:
Scientists determine if this microscopic plastic is harmful,
Clothing manufacturers, laundry products makers, or wastewater treatment plants can do anything to reduce the volume of microscopic plastics being released into the environment, and,
Which community will be the first to suggest banning polyester slacks.
Pam interviewed mostly smaller to mid-sized companies for the report, so many Plastics Blog readers should be able to relate to their experiences.
I'll highlight one of the findings, on the unexpected benefits that companies are experiencing as a result of their efforts. Here's what a few companies had to say:
"Through social media, we've been able to connect with other marketers in related fields. In addition to nurturing business relationships, our social media communication helps us find new ideas and tricks for promoting our company." - Ashley Jernigan, UniTherm International.
"It was quite a learning curve fitting a plastics manufacturer into a social media environment. But as we started and continue to connect with other SMBs we were provided with more ideas than we could keep track of. By engaging more, we found more ways to engage." - Johnny Bravo, PolyPak America.
"At first I thought social media was all about promoting our product, but we have found a couple of really good suppliers and freight companies [through social media] that have actually saved us money! We have also formed some valuable relationships from some very supportive businesses." - Jennifer Toolis, ABC Plastics, Inc.
"We were actually surprised at the number of leads that came in within the first few months of participating in social media. Knowing that an effective social media presence can take time to build, we really didn't expect to get leads through these efforts as fast as we did. It just goes to show that you don't have to be out there for a very long time in order to get people's attention; you just have to be there at the right moment when they need you!" - Pam Aungst Teubner, E&T Plastics.
Pam interviewed me for the report too, so check the link for more information on my experience with social media at Plastics News, plus tips and information on challenges, useful tools, how to get started, and dealing with competitive concerns.
Exercise in technology: 3D-printed Stradivarius violin
By now we've all seen cool examples of 3D printing used to quickly make prototype products from computer drawings.
Today let's go old school -- with a fun story about a replica of a Stradivarius violin made from polyaryletherketone on a 3D printer.
Wired.co.uk has the story. The violin was made by Krailling, Germany-based EOS GmbH.
"The violin was a technology exercise," EOS told Wired.co.uk. "We wanted to test what we can achieve with our technology, which...is ideally suited for complex structures. This is why we chose a complex musical instrument which normally is being made in a very traditional way and with a traditional material -- wood."
How about it, music fans? Is the sound any good? How does it compare to the original?
I received a note this week from a vinyl window fabricator that donated product for a deserving family featured on ABC's "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition."
The company, National Vinyl LLC of Chicopee, Mass., said its vendors -- Chelsea Building Products, Edgetech, AGC Glass, Guardian, Timber Trading and OSI Sealants -- also donated material for the project, a home in Springfield, Mass.
Chelsea Building Products supplied all the vinyl profiles.
"We are extremely proud to be involved in this project," said National Vinyl General Manager Scott Channell. "The ability to assist a deserving member of our community is an honor and our employees as well as our vendors are excited to be contributing to this great cause."
My wife is a fan of "Extreme Makeover," and we always notice the not-so-subtle product placements shots. We're not bothered by them, though -- half the fun of watching the show is seeing which companies supply the cool building products and appliances.
Congratulations to National Vinyl and Chelsea, we'll be watching for you in a future episode.
Defects and malfunctions can be fixed, but design problems are forever. And auto interiors are full of them, according to a new report from J.D. Power and Associates.
According to the 2011 U.S. Interior Quality and Satisfaction Study, released today, design problems account for a majority of the quality issues that new owners have with vehicle interiors.
The top five most frequently reported problems: material scuffs/soils easily; cruise control difficult to use/controls in poor location; cup holders difficult to use; center console difficult to use; and door locks difficult to use/controls in poor location.
I come across reviews all the time where journalists complain about the plastics in new cars. The material isn't mentioned specifically in this report -- the emphasis here is more on the design than material selection.
Owners reported an average of 17.2 problems per 100 vehicles related to the vehicle interior, and 11.6 per 100 are the result of design issues, according to the report.
Allan Dix, research director of automotive product quality at J.D. Power and Associates, noted that interior comfort is very important to buyers.
"In fact, more than one-half of new-vehicle buyers cite interior comfort as one of the most important factors in choosing a vehicle," he said. "As a result, it's crucial to improve on interior design issues -- such as difficulty using the center console or door locks -- as these are issues that can really make a difference to the overall vehicle ownership experience."
The study is based on responses from more than 73,000 new-vehicle owners who purchased a 2011 model-year vehicle. The study was fielded between February and May 2011.
If you're an auto supplier, you're talking resin pricing
Processors of all types have been dealing with rising prices for many commodity and engineering resins this year. For auto suppliers like Magna International Inc., that signals the start of negotiations on who pays for the increases.
Magna CEO Don Walker recently talked to Automotive News senior writer David Sedgwick about the company's purchasing strategy, including dealing with rising resin prices.
Here are a few of the plastics-related highlights from the interview:
We're told that suppliers generally get compensated for the rising price of copper, aluminum and steel. But we hear that plastic resin has been a headache.
"Resin is a bit of an odd one. It's hard to figure out what the cost drivers really are. Quite often, the resin suppliers don't even care about the auto industry because they have other [customers]. So they'll say, 'We'll give you this price if the economy is up, or that price if the economy is down. And if you don't like it, don't buy it.'"
Are your customers compensating you for the rising cost of plastic resin?
"Typically it takes a bit of time, and you have to have a lot of discussions. If [resin costs] go up 25 percent, the car companies will expect us to do something to mitigate it. It's never a straight pass-through. Hopefully it's an intelligent and relatively fair negotiation. [Customers] who are not fair will pay the price later."
Are automakers getting more realistic about raw material costs?
"I would say they are reasonable. But we still usually have a delay of three to six months. There are a lot of discussions going on right now."
Duluth, Ga., recycler U.S. Plastics Recovery has a good story to tell about how it started operations just before the start of the Great Recession, but it still managed to thrive.
Plastics News staff reporter Mike Verespej shared the story last year.
Steve Hogan, one of the firm's co-founders, tells the WSJ blog that the industrial plastics recycling company "was nearly swept under by the world-wide recession which hit in the fall of 2008. Our inventory was devalued by 90 percent and our sales fell by 70 percent in the first few months following the global collapse."
The company decided the only way to survive was to buy all the scrap it could at low prices, and wait for demand to pick up.
"To do this, we needed to raise capital, buy additional processing equipment and move into a larger facility. If we could implement this strategy quickly, we would leapfrog the competition," Hogan said.
Check the competition website for more stories about small businesses that are trying to innovate their way out of the recession. Eventually the newspaper will pick a company to feature in its Nov. 21 Small Business report.
Here's a sad update to an earlier story: Michelle Caudle, the wife of the former manager at a plastics compounder who joined the U.S. Army at age 39, has died of cancer.
You may recall that Bill Caudle joined the service in 2009. He had been laid off from his job at PolyOne Corp.'s plant in Sussex, Wis., and he joined the Army because he needed healthcare insurance for his family.
Michelle had ovarian cancer. She died Friday at age 42. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has a lengthy obituary that brings readers up to date on the family's story.
Thoughts on bag hoarding and self-destructing plastic
U.S. readers might believe California is ground zero for the debate on plastic bag taxes and bans. But long-time Plastics Blog readers know that the latest wave of anti-bag legislation actually originated in the United Kingdom.
Film maker Rebecca Hosking sparked the debate in the small village of Modbury, England, after a trip to the Pacific Ocean where she saw environmental damage created by plastic marine debris.
The bag ban battle rages on today, in England, Wales and Scotland, as you can see from these headlines from sister newspaper PRW. And the latest, somewhat surprising, word comes from a newspaper that has long crusaded against plastic bags, the Daily Mail.
First, she claims that "some people are starting to hoard free plastic carrier bags because they are so fearful they will become unavailable."
Why do I find this surprising? Because just about everyone who cares for dogs will hoard free plastic bags all the time -- not just when they're afraid they'll become unavailable -- for obvious reasons. Perhaps Lord Baroness of Parkes would like to visit my house and help clean up after our terriers.
Second, she suggests that plastic bag makers can control the degradability of bags to a degree that sounds a bit exaggerated.
"The chemical additive D2W, which has been used since the 1970s, has now been developed to a degree of accuracy that almost the exact date of self-destruct can be built into plastic bag manufacture," she said.
"Would not it be an advantage for everyone to know this date so that bags could be tailored to certain markets such as the fast food industry to prevent bags clogging our waterways and to prevent other bags intended for long-term storage unexpectedly turning into confetti?"
While Symphony is an active participant in the bag ban debate, I'm skeptical that the company would go so far to say they can predict "almost the exact date" that bags manufactured with their additives will "self-destruct."
Hype and exaggeration are often weapons used in the debate over plastic bags -- both in the United States and the United Kingdom.
U.S. manufacturing is at a "critical crossroads" according to a new report from consulting firm Booz & Co., with the plastics sector "on the edge" -- it could become a global competitor or see its operations displaced to other countries.
The report, "Manufacturing's Wake-Up Call" (PDF), warns that manufacturers and policymakers are at a true crossroads.
If things go well, U.S. manufacturing could account for 95% of all products Americans consume. But if they don't, output could drop by half.
Today, U.S. manufacturers provide about 75% of the products that Americans consume.
"As labor costs and currency rates play a smaller part in manufacturing decisions, there is an opportunity for U.S. business leaders and policymakers to rise to the challenge and create conditions that support manufacturing," said Arvind Kaushal, a partner at Booz & Co,
"The potential for a rebound is there, but only if the right actions are taken," he said.
The report breaks down each manufacturing segment, classifying their prospects into four different categories:
Global leaders. Aerospace, chemicals, machinery, medical equipment, and semiconductor industries have a critical worldwide advantage stemming from their high investment scale, established intellectual property, skilled workforces, and close ties with customers.
Regional powers. Food, beverages, and tobacco; nonmetallic mineral products; wood products, and petroleum coal segments, among others, benefit from the U.S. as their largest market. Mexico and Canada offer additional markets for these companies.
On the edge. Paper, plastics, electrical equipment and components, computer equipment, fabricated metal products, pharmaceuticals, printing, and certain automotive equipment companies are besieged by low-cost overseas competitors. They could become global competitors themselves or see their operations displaced to other countries.
Niche players. Textiles, apparel, leather, furniture, and appliances companies serve small-scale niche markets through domestic operations, while most production is outside the United States.
Plastics may fall into the "on the edge" category, but just as important to Plastics Blog readers are the various important end markets. And the inclusion of chemicals in the "global leaders" category is still a potential plus, since U.S. manufacturers may benefit if their domestic suppliers remain strong.
The report calls for the private sector and policymakers to concentrate on four actions to provide the greatest momentum for manufacturing:
Think and grow regionally. The U.S. needs to build a better future with Mexico, shifting less-demanding, labor-intensive processes to that country while helping to build a safer consumer economy there and retaining highly skilled work in the United States.
Develop and attract skilled talent. The U.S. needs more robust manufacturing education programs, immigration reform, and promoting the attractiveness of manufacturing careers.
Foster high-impact clusters. The public and private sectors can build geographical concentrations of suppliers, service providers and academic institutions, reinforced by investments in infrastructure.
Simplify and streamline the tax and regulatory structure. The official U.S. statutory corporate tax rate stands at 39%. Closing the gap between statutory and effective rates (typically 28%) would be a revenue-neutral way to put U.S. manufacturing on a level global playing field.
Now that we're 14 months away from a presidential election, I imagine that some candidates will embrace parts of this report -- at least the parts they agree with. (Do you expect anyone to stick their neck out for immigration reform?)
But if that translates to a real, comprehensive manufacturing policy from Washington is a longshot at best.
Newell Rubbermaid posted a news release today on its plans to open a premium child care center at its headquarters in Georgia. That got me thinking about how rare it is these days for companies to promote that they offer excellent benefits.
I'm not a complete skeptic. I know that many companies -- including plastics suppliers and processors -- are known for their great worker relations.
But after we all witnessed the debates in Ohio and Wisconsin this year about public sector union worker benefits, I'm starting to feel like there's a backlash against workers getting anything beyond the bare minimums.
Newell Rubbermaid's news release said the child development center at its Sandy Springs headquarters "will complement the company's comprehensive benefit offerings designed to meet the diverse needs of a multi-generational workforce."
The company said it also offers flexible work options, back-up child and elder care and a program to help new mothers transition back to work.
"Newell Rubbermaid is committed to being an employer of choice by providing benefits that support the needs of a diverse and multi-generational workforce," said Joe Ketter, vice president of corporate human resources.
Offering employees convenient, affordable child care will help retain top talent, he said.
The company said classrooms at the new child care center will incorporate Newell Rubbermaid products, incuding Graco-brand items. (I had to think for a minute why Little Tikes toys weren't mentioned in the release -- then I remembered that Tikes now is owned by MGA Entertainment Inc.)
Is Newell Rubbermaid's announcement a sign of good things to come for employee benefits at other companies? I think we can be skeptical about that.
Good workers may be hard to find (and retain). But until the economy shows more robust signs of improvement, I don't expect most employers to pull out all the stops on improving benefits.
Manufacturing is alive and well in North America -- more on that later. But I always get a kick out of companies that serve odd or unusual niche markets.
How about bowling balls, CDs and chopsticks, for example?
A few of the products have plastics connections -- polycarbonate CDs and DVDs, for example:
The physical is dead, long live the download. That's what entertainment observers have been saying since the turn of the century and they're not wrong. Last year CD sales fell by 20% from 2009, marking the fourth year in a row of increasingly brutal decline. But despite this, Sony DADC this spring announced a $72 million expansion of its existing Terre Haute, Indiana, manufacturing plant, in which it makes compact discs, Blu-ray equipment, video games and other electronics, while employing some 1,312 people (the planned expansion will add another 100 jobs).
Why? Well, partly, it's just consolidation. With the closing of its Pittman, New Jersey compact disc plant, Sony DADC is merely shifting operations east (and shedding 200 jobs - the Pittman plant employed 300 people).
And partly, it's a question of demographics. You, future-embracing consumer that you are, may be eager to embrace the world of on-demand downloads or dodgy torrents, but Aunt Gertrude in Duluth is going to be hanging on to those newfangled CDs until the day she dies. And there are a heck of a lot of Aunt Gertrudes out there, with a good decade or so left in them.
These aren't examples of booming industries -- there's global competition for pencils, socks, ironing boards, sneakers, pianos, sparklers and electrical relays (the other examples cited in the article).
The reader who sent me the link said she thought the article was very interesting, but also a bit sad.
Still, there are plenty of North American manufacturing success stories. Think of that the next time you break out the Georgia-made chopsticks at your favorite Chinese restaurant.
Steve Jobs' decision to resign as CEO of Apple Inc. last night is the biggest story on the business page today. Jobs is one of the rare corporate CEOs who became a household name. Newspaper readers understand that, no matter the company culture, Apple without Jobs will be a different company.
Apple may not be the No. 1 player in personal computers, but the company's impact in that market -- and in smartphones, tablet computers and portable media players -- has been significant.
And that's not limited to operating systems, software and features. Apple also put an emphasis on design -- the materials, the colors, the shapes -- that has been revolutionary.
That's one way that Jobs has had a major impact on the plastics industry.
Plastics News correspondent Roger Renstrom touched on Apple and plastics design in a sidebar story to a special report on electronics earlier this year.
Jonathan Glancey of The Guardian newspaper also wrote about Jobs' influence on design, in a feature today headlined "Steve Jobs: iDesigned your life."
Here's part of Glancey's column that highlights the plastics-related design breakthroughs at Apple:
One of Jobs's greatest contributions to design was the promotion of Jonathan Ive, the brilliant young British designer, to senior vice president of industrial design at Apple Inc in 1998. Jobs had been away from Apple for some years - creating Pixar and thus Toy Story in the interim - yet when he came back, he teamed up with Ive to create a range of hugely appealing products. The first was the colourful iMac of 1998, a bold attempt to break away from the dull world of beige and grey plastic computer cases. With its oddball marriage of boiled sweet colours and transparent plastics, the iMac was certainly eye-catching, and it also sold - two million in the first 12 months.
But Jobs and Ive really got into their stride in 2001 with the iPod MP3 player, a small, minimalist design that evoked the work of the legendary German designer Dieter Rams, who had done so much since the 1950s to make Braun products, from record players to electric shavers, sell in prodigious quantities worldwide. The iPhone (2007) and iPad three years later have seen the Jobs-Ive design partnership come to fruition. These lightweight yet well-made, jewel-like objects, with their crystal-clear screens, finally imbued the design of computers and digital gizmos with a seductive quality. Once seen and touched, sales were made.
Another way that Jobs has had an impact on plastics is related to material choices -- specifically those that have been the result of pressure from environmentalists.
For years, Greenpeace has pressured Apple to avoid PVC and brominated flame retardants. Long before the word "sustainability" become a buzzword, Apple's plastics material choices have been under a microscope.
Greenpeace determined that a significant number of Apple buyers cared about these issues. Apple, indeed, has paid attention, and it has adjusted its material portfolio as a result of the campaign.
Now that Jobs is retiring, will we see changes from Apple that will impact its plastics part and material suppliers? Or will the company be cautious about straying too far from Jobs' strategies?
The folks at Inc. magazine must have had a tough time picking the 5,000 fastest-growing U.S. companies this year.
Despite the sour economy, firms that managed to survive the recession have probably experienced growth between 2007 to 2010, the time frame that Inc. measured this year.
Paso Robles, Calif.-based IQMS -- a developer of enterprise resource planning software -- sent a news release today highlighting that it made the Inc. 5000 list for the first time this year. The company ranked No. 4,723, reporting three-year organic sales growth of 11 percent.
So I decided to check out the full list to look for other plastics-related companies.
After scrolling through 5,000 companies, I have no doubt that I missed some. But here are a few that I spotted:
Injection molder Steinwall Inc ranked No. 3,909, with three-year sales growth of 35 percent. Plastics News readers know Steinwall -- the company was a finalist for our Processor of the Year award, and won our first-ever PN Excellence Award for employee relations.
Integra Enclosures, a Mentor, Ohio-based manufacturer of polycarbonate and nonmetal enclosures used to protect electrical devices. The company ranked No. 3,872 on the Inc. list, with 2010 sales of $4.5 million and three-year sales growth of 36 percent.
Congratulations to all the winning companies -- if you spot another plastics firm, post a comment below and we'll add them to the list.
All of the winners will be invited to an awards ceremony on Sept. 24 at the Gaylord National Resort in National Harbor, Md.
The reality TV craze is looking at the plastics industry this year -- well, sort of -- with a new program on Animal Planet that features an acyrlic fabricator.
It's not just any fabricator, though. The subject of "Tanked," which airs on Friday nights, is Acyrlic Tank Manufacturing Inc., a family-owned company, based in Las Vegas, that specializes in huge aquariums.
ATM appears to have some significant manufacturing capabilities -- check them out here.
Check out the video below for a sample of the type of tanks this company makes, or this link for more videos.
And for a taste of another acrylic fabricator that's doing impressive work, see Plastics News senior reporter Frank Esposito's feature story on Reynolds Polymer Technology Inc. of Grand Junction, Colo., which built a giant display enclosure for a historic carousel in Brooklyn Bridge Park in New York.
Trivia time: Which plastics material supplier pledged this week to donate $1 million over the next three years to the world-famous Cleveland Orchestra?
If you answered Lubrizol Corp., give yourself an appropriate fanfare.
The funds will go to the Cleveland Orchestra's Sound for the Centennial campaign. The money will go to the orchestra's education and community programs.
"We are honored to be in a position to support the Orchestra in such a significant way as they approach their centennial," said Chairman, President and CEO James L. Hambrick. "Beginning with Lubrizol's founders, the company has maintained a commitment to supporting the communities in which it operates and what better way to continue this tradition than with ensuring the future of the Orchestra, a true regional gem. We extend our best wishes for their continued success."
Personal computers turn 30 -- is it time for their obituary?
"Personal" computers have been around since the 1970s -- I worked on a TRS-80 in high school, and let's just say that was sometime before 1980. But today the world is celebrating the 30th birthday of the PC, because the IBM 5150 was introduced on Aug. 12, 1981.
PCs have used a lot of pounds of engineering resins in the past 30 years, and I've contributed my share. I must have 50 pounds of obsolete equipment in my basement and garage.
But the market is changing, and now analysts are wondering if the PC era is over.
On Wednesday, Mark Dean, chief technology officer for IBM Middle East and Africa, wrote on the company's "Building a Smarter Planet" blog that although he was proud to help design the first PC, he's also proud that IBM exited the PC business in 2005, when it sold that division to Lenovo.
"While many in the tech industry questioned IBM's decision to exit the business at the time, it's now clear that our company was in the vanguard of the post-PC era," Dean wrote.
I, personally, have moved beyond the PC as well. My primary computer now is a tablet. When I helped design the PC, I didn't think I'd live long enough to witness its decline. But, while PCs will continue to be much-used devices, they're no longer at the leading edge of computing. They're going the way of the vacuum tube, typewriter, vinyl records, CRT and incandescent light bulbs.
PCs are being replaced at the center of computing not by another type of device--though there's plenty of excitement about smart phones and tablets--but by new ideas about the role that computing can play in progress. These days, it's becoming clear that innovation flourishes best not on devices but in the social spaces between them, where people and ideas meet and interact. It is there that computing can have the most powerful impact on economy, society and people's lives.
Is the PC era dead? I doubt it -- tech analysts and writers are always eager to write off yesterday's technology. Sure, PCs have replace typewriters. But I think we've got at least a decade or two left before PCs disappear.
Court rejects class certification for BPA lawsuits
U.S. District Judge Ortrie Smith in Missouri has denied a request by plaintiffs' lawyers for class certification in lawsuits against six makers of polycarbonate baby bottles and sippy cups.
The ruling (PDF), dated July 5, involves a case with defendants Handi-Craft Co., Gerber Products Co., Playtex Products Inc., Evenflow Co. Inc., Nalge Nunc International Corp. and RC2 Corp.
The plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers failed to warn consumers of the dangers of BPA despite their knowledge of its alleged toxicity.
Denying class certification doesn't end the lawsuits. But it's interesting that the court had some comments about the debate over BPA safety, which it addressed in determining if the lawsuits could satisfy federal guidelines on "commonality."
Here's a portion of the ruling:
"Defendants contend - and the Court agrees - that a consumer's knowledge of BPA's existence and the surrounding controversy is legally significant. Knowledge of the controversy carries with it knowledge of the likelihood (or at least possibility) that a plastic baby bottle contained BPA. A consumer who knew about the controversy and also knew that the bottle s/he purchased contained BPA would have all the knowledge Plaintiffs allege should have been disclosed, and will have tremendous difficulty convincing a jury that the seller was unjustly enriched. Similarly, a consumer who knew about the controversy and exhibited no concern about whether the product purchased contained BPA may have difficulty convincing a jury that the seller was unjustly enriched. This same analysis holds true for claims under consumer protection statutes."
A fountain featuring rotomolded sharks -- could plastics be any more fun? Greg Lynn, a California-based architect, created the project for the Hammer Museum in Los Angeles.
Now the fountain is in the front yard of Lynn's home, and on Aug. 3 The New York Times featured a Q&A interview with the Ohio-born materials connoisseur.
Much of the interview is focused on the material, so here's a snippet of what Lynn has to say about plastics:
Plastics, as a material, are very nasty, but as an alternative to, let's say, a brick, which seems really natural, they start to look pretty good. They're very low energy to produce, very lightweight to transport and construct. That's why they're so popular. And that's part of the problem with plastic: it's so good and so cheap that it becomes disposable.
Seems fitting that the fountain was featured at the Hammer -- the museum was founded by Armand Hammer, former chairman of Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Check out the video for more about the project, Lynn's thoughts about plastics, and shots of the fountain under construction.
Many businesses are skittish about marketing sustainability benefits of their products these days because they are afraid of being branded as "greenwashers" -- I think that's especially true in the plastics sector.
Thwart the most discriminating of critics by visibly making progress toward measurable goals. Being proactive in responding to the public's concerns and expectations starts with a visible and committed CEO. That's because CEOs can create an emotional link between the company and its customers. Empower your employees, too. Educate them on environmental issues and the specifics of their company's processes so they can fuel authentic communications about your company's green initiatives.
Don't mislead. Be specific, prominent and comprehensive so as not to confuse. Consumers may claim to know what commonly used terms such as "recyclable" and "biodegradable" mean, but they can be easily mistaken -- creating risk for unsuspecting sustainable marketers.
The best advice for green marketers is to adopt specific standards for disclosure of green initiatives and to follow the FTC Green Guides or other appropriate government guidelines.
Don't expect this to be the last word on the issue, but the latest study on bisphenol A safety suggests that people don't accumulate enough of the chemical to cause harm.
The Wall Street Journaleditorialized on the study yesterday. The research was led by Justin Teeguarden at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and published in the journal Toxicological Studies -- and funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
According to the WSJ report, subjects were fed a BPA-rich diet for 24 hours, then their blood and urine was monitored for traces of the chemical.
"The results of the study, which was duplicated in two separate government labs, may not change the fate of BPA in the court of public opinion," the newspaper editorialized. "Lost amid the hysteria were the benefits of BPA, including the fact that it helped to eliminate botulism in canned food. Where does a chemical go to get its reputation back?"
Maybe I've been following bag ban lawsuits for too long, but when I read this story today I chuckled.
According to The Beach Reporter, the former city attorney in Manhattan Beach, Calif., plans to file a lawsuit against the city. He's upset that he's not being credited with winning the landmark case that allows the city to ban plastic bags.
Former city attorney Robert Wadden was terminated in April. Then, earlier this month, the state Supreme Court ruled in favor of the city in the bag ban case.
"Their argument in firing me was that I was not competent. But you have to be fairly competent to win a Supreme Court case," Wadden told The Beach Reporter, a weekly newspaper in Manhattan Beach.
Wadden, who is 62 and worked for the city for more than 15 years, says he plans to file an age discrimination case, and he is seeking at least $155,000 in severance.
The city's elected leaders have applauded the ruling as a major victory for Manhattan Beach, but excluded mentioning Wadden in public remarks. His name was not included in a press release issued shortly after the ruling was announced, nor was it mentioned during a brief ceremony marking the victory at the most recent City Council meeting.
Wadden believes the lack of public recognition is intentional.
I guess the city could have saved itself some embarrassment by mentioning Wadden in their press release. Now the courts may have to decide who gets credit for winning the bag suit!
It's often fun to see what sorts of products that designers can create from plastics. Today I spotted an item in the Gizmodo blog that's worth sharing: the Frii, a super-strong all-plastic bicycle.
Gizmodo's Kwame Opam noted that design student Dror Peleg created the bike with flat-proof tires, a shorter fork, and a ribbed body.
"So, while its not winning any beauty pageants, it could probably take a good beating," Opam wrote.
There's a photo below of the colorful Frii. If you want to see more, or get more information, check Designboom.com.
Keith McLoughlin, president and CEO of appliance maker Electrolux AB, singled out rising resin costs yesterday when the company presented its latest quarterly results.
It's not surprising -- Electrolux reported that its quarterly sales and profits both fell, yet its raw material prices are rising. That's not a good trend.
McLoughlin said the company plans to raise prices to offset its higher costs -- "a risky strategy," The Wall Street Journalreports today, "given low consumer confidence in mature markets."
Electrolux raised some eyebrows last year when the company hired a marketing firm to help it scout the United States for injection molders that could help lower its part costs.
Is it a coincidence that now the company is blaming rising resin costs for its troubles? Electrolux looks like a company that's trying pretty hard to keep a close eye on its suppliers.
Mike SanClements, an ecologist at the University of Colorado, just concluded a two-week attempt to minimize the plastics in his life, which he blogged about for Grist.org.
I've blogged about "let's live without plastics" efforts before, and some of SanClements' observations are pretty typical. So let's focus on what he does differently.
He started the series by observing that plastic is "both amazing and horrible. Think about all the great things made from plastic -- the computer I'm typing on, our phones, medical and scientific equipment. I don't think wooden cell phones would work so well.
"At the same time, we use far too much plastic and the environmental and health effects are terrible. Plastic is made from fossil fuels so it's energy-intensive to produce. It doesn't go away when you put it in the trash and when you recycle it, it doesn't get used over and over and over again like aluminum."
SanClements had an entertaining post about trying to minimize plastics that he encounters because he has a dog, Hank. SanClements eventually purchases some biodegradable plastic bags (made from cornstarch) to clean up after Hank.
It's interesting how the term "plastic" is being applied only to materials that are made from natural gas or oil and take a long time to degrade. Is that intentional -- are suppliers of resins made from renewable materials and/or degrade more quickly intentionally avoiding the term "plastic"? I don't think so. But that's how SanClements uses the terms, and I think that's a pretty typical attitude these days.
Also interesting -- check out the comments from his readers about how they tackle the dog waste issue without using plastic bags.
SanClements concluded his series yesterday, noting that "it would be nearly impossible to avoid plastic entirely unless maybe you were homesteading in Alaska. Even then, I think you'd be hard pressed."
He then divides plastics into three categories -- the good, the bad, and the ugly.
"The good is your phone, camera, computer, medical equipment, ski bindings, etc. These things last a long time and using plastic makes possible, or greatly improves, their performance. Backpacking with a canvas tent? I'm cool with nylon, thanks.
"The bad is stuff like plastic food storage containers. It gets reused over and over but while you are using it, who knows whether or not it's leaching nasty chemicals into your food? It's nice to know that in some instances, like water bottles, BPA-free plastics are now available for purchase.
"The ugly is what I call lazy plastic -- single-use plastic that's easily avoidable with almost no effort required to find a substitute. Plastic grocery bags are the king of ugly plastic. There is never a need to get a plastic grocery bag at the store. They should be banned. You can bring your bags and you can also bring your own bags for produce."
Donated pipe delivers water to rural African villages
There's a crisis that takes the lives of millions of people every year -- lack of access to safe drinking water. Los Angeles-based pipe extruder JM Eagle has been working around the globe to ease that burden in developing nations.
In late 2009, the company shipped nearly 400 miles of pipe -- worth about $2 million -- to Kenya, Uganda, Mali, Malawi, Rwanda, Ghana and Tanzania for water-related infrastructure projects. President and CEO Walter Wang also provided funding to engineer and design of the project, according to a news release from the company.
The company issued the release yesterday as Wang concluded a tour of water infrastructure projects that he helped support in Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya.
"Piping water to these villages, step by step, will eventually lead them out of poverty and sickness and show them a prosperous future. I thank God we are so blessed to be able to do these projects," Wang said.
This is the latest in a string of water infrastructure projects for Walter and his wife, Shirley Wang, founder and CEO of fiberglass door maker Plastpro Inc.
In 2005, JM Eagle provided plastic pipe and other materials to transport drinking water from a mountain spring to a community of 5,000 people in Honduras, and supported a project to develop water delivery and sanitation systems for needy communities in northern Thailand.
In 2005, JM Eagle sent more than 70 miles of pipe to Potou, Senegal, providing water to 67 villages with a population of more than 13,500 people.
JM Eagle currently is working with the Millennium Villages Project, launched by Columbia University's Earth Institute in 2005, which is working to provide safer water to more than 125,000 people living in Africa.
Professor Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute, said: "With water there can be productive agriculture, good nutrition, sanitation and health. Without it there is only poverty and disease. I am pleased to be able to travel Africa again with my good friend Walter to see the difference our partnership is making to the future of the continent. Thanks to the generosity of private sector leaders like Walter, we are changing that."
The story, from our colleagues at Waste & Recycling News, said that biodegradable products such as some disposable cups and utensils may be doing more harm than good in landfills, because they release a powerful greenhouse gas as they break down.
Since there was so much interest, I want to make sure that readers notice that we've published a Perspective column from one of the authors of the study that prompted the first story.
The column, headlined "Collecting landfill gas good step," is by James Levis, a researcher and doctoral student at North Carolina State University.
Levis notes that he is aware that his report, "Is Biodegradability a Desirable Attribute for Discarded Solid Waste? Perspectives from a National Landfill Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model," had generated news headlines.
In some cases, he said, writers have drawn improper conclusions from the report.
For example, writers who he identified as anti-environmentalists "have tried to use the results to portray environmentalists and environmentalism as naive and/or misguided. This argument is nonsensical when made by those who deny anthropogenic climate change. This research is meaningless if one does not first accept basic climate science. The purpose of the research is to allow us to more effectively mitigate GHG emissions by making informed decisions."
What the study does suggest is that landfill operators should be much more aggressive about collecting methane from landfills. In addition, it suggests that "increasing composting infrastructure could also be beneficial if additional life-cycle research shows benefits from composting these materials instead of landfilling."
I know this won't be the final word on the merits of degradable plastics. But it should help to put the North Carolina State research into the proper perspective.
California had a long history of groups trying to secede from the rest of the state -- and the newest one has a plastics angle!
Jeff Stone, a member of the Riverside County board of supervisors, has proposed that 13 mostly inland, conservative counties break away from the rest of the state and form a new state of "South California.''
His proposed new state would include Fresno, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Mono, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Tulare counties.
Los Angeles is the largest city in southern California, but it's not included in Stone's "South California" -- and that's where the plastics angle comes in.
Stone told Phil Willon of The Los Angeles Times:
"Los Angeles is purposely excluded because they have the same liberal policies that Sacramento does. The last thing I want to do is create a state that's a carbon copy of what we have now. ... Los Angeles just enacted a ban on plastic grocery bags. That put three or four manufacturers out of business.''
Willon's story notes that Stone's proposal has the proverbial's snowball's chance of actually going anywhere.
A spokesman for Gov. Jerry Brown called it "a supremely ridiculous waste of everybody's time," and a USC historian noted that secessionist movements are nothing new in California.
"It's never passed, and it will never pass. It's been up to bat 220 times and struck out every time," said USC history professor Kevin Starr.
Dow's Williams on shingles, leadership and innovation
Plastics News readers have a lot of interest in Dow Chemical Co.'s solar shingle project -- the company is actually injection molding durable plastic shingles that double as solar panels.
Carol Williams, a Dow group senior vice president and president of the chemicals and energy division, mentions the shingle project prominently today in an interview posted by James daSilva in the SmartBlog on Leadership.
"Driving the invention is solar, but innovation is putting it into the shingle," including making such shingles more energy- and cost-efficient for residential installations, Williams said.
She cites the shingle as an example of an innovative project that Dow is investing R&D dollars in, in hopes that the company can create a significant business by responding to major challenges facing society.
Williams says Dow invested $1.6 billion in R&D last year, while coming up with 500 projects that the company believes could generate $30 billion in sales.
Some thoughts on SPI, ACC and CPIA working together
A newbie might not think today's news is all that important -- the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc., the plastics division of the American Chemistry Council and the Canadian Plastics Industry Association are forming an alliance to help the industry speak with a single voice in North America.
But formalizing this spirit of cooperation -- even naming it the North American Plastics Alliance -- is noteworthy. Especially in an industry that, despite its size, sometimes suffers from lack of political clout.
Mike Verespej, Plastics News' staff reporter in Washington, wrote about the agreement today. He points out that the alliance initially will focus on four areas: pellet containment, advocacy, energy recovery and initiatives aimed at getting key stakeholders to look more favorably on plastics.
Again, to a newcomer, the list of challenges that the industry is facing today may seem daunting and unprecedented: bag bans, PS foam container bans, regulatory concerns about the safety of bisphenol A and phthalates.
But scrutiny is nothing new to plastics. Think back to the late 1980s, when SPI formed the Council for Solid Waste Solutions. Just like today, plastic bags were under attack, PS foam was being banned, and chemical safety was on the public docket.
If anything, it's surprising how little has changed.
Yes, some of these issues are on the rise. Mike listed them in his story today:
Some 22 communities in the United States have bans on plastic carryout bags, eight of them enacted this year. In addition, Washington, D.C., and Montgomery County, Md., have a 5-cent tax on paper and plastic carryout bags.
In California alone, 36 cities and three communities -- most of them adjacent to the ocean -- have banned polystyrene takeout food-service containers.
Nine states, the city of Chicago and four counties in New York have bans on BPA in baby bottles.
Considering those challenges, it's essential that the North American plastics industry's leading trade groups cooperate at all levels. And, to their credit, that's been the case -- at least in recent years.
But it wasn't that long ago that the groups were at odds. SPI and ACC went through a bitter divorce. For a while, they seemed to battle over anything and everything. Plastics News frequently took them to task in editorials, which didn't make us popular -- but they deserved the criticism. Disagreement contributed to balkanization, with special interest groups popping up outside the structure of what should have been the industry's umbrella organizations.
Today, the industry's leaders deserve credit for handling issues the right way. Their staffers regularly cooperate on important topics. And they recognize that they should formalize the relationships to make sure that they continue, regardless of who is in charge.
In journalism school, professors tell young reporters that conflict is news. But today, at least, cooperation is news. It's a welcome development.
Report: More study needed on biodegradable plastics
Biodegradable plastics offer some promise for dealing with waste issues like litter and marine debris. But a new report prepared for the European Commission's Directorate-General Environment recommends more study before policymakers take actions that encourage manufacturers to redesign products to use biodegradable polymers.
The redesign of plastics and bioplastics has the potential to reduce the use of fossil fuels, decrease carbon dioxide emissions and decrease plastic waste.
More agreement is needed on the use of Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) to assess the environmental impact of bioplastics and redesigned plastics and LCAs need to focus more on end-of-life analysis.
Clearer definitions and better labeling on the new breeds of plastics are required as well as improved public communication.
Assessments of the impacts on waste management infrastructure should be performed at a local and national level.
Research is needed to assess the critical mass needed to make bioplastics affordable and to identify the most appropriate plastics to substitute.
The report doesn't go into a great deal of depth, but it is a useful primer for readers interested in the issues involved with the potentially growing market for biodegradable plastics.
First up is John Spevacek, author of the "It's the Rheo Thing" blog, which I started following after his post. John writes about a wide variety of topics -- sometimes fun, sometimes technical, always with an authoritative voice and just enough of his personal opinion and experience. I highly recommend his work.
John shared this about his social marketing efforts:
Anytime I create a new post on my blog, I immediately go to Twitter and send a tweet. I know it directs more traffic to the site, and certain readers look first at the Twitter feed before going to the site. I know there are utilities that will allow for crossposting the Twitter feed to Facebook, but I haven't set that up yet. Ditto for LinkedIn.
Also, every once in a while I write a post that I consider pretty good and interesting. When that happens, I make sure (via a friend) that it is submitted to reddit. That really drives the traffic over.
Next up is Jennifer from ABC Plastics Inc., a plastic spool supplier in Lodi, Ohio. She's involved in the company's extremely active Facebook and Twitter pages -- follow them if you want frequent updates -- and a LinkedIn page with 120 connections.
Here's what Jennifer had to share:
We are using social media, but we haven't had our a-ha moment yet and come up with something imaginative, so I will use something I saw someone else do that I thought was pretty creative.
Last week there was a company trying to get to 3,000 fans on Facebook, so they promised a free t-shirt to the 3,000th fan. The number went up really fast until 2,998...it took a couple of minutes for someone to click "like" knowing they were about to let someone else win. Now they have 3,057 fans and one of them has a new t-shirt.
I did not know of this company before this and I did not actually find them on Facebook. They tweeted about the give-away and someone I follow on Twitter re-tweeted it. It did lead me to their Facebook page and I was too late for the t-shirt, but I am now a fan of a company I didn't even know existed. The hype over the t-shirt was enough to draw people to their page and see what they're all about.
Since her post, I've noted quite a few plastics companies using the "help us reach our goal" to win new followers, often with quick results.
Finally, there's Pam Aungst Teubner from E&T Plastics, a distributor and manufacturer that was established in 1946.
But don't let that fool you -- E&T may be an older company by plastics industry standards, but it's a leader in the newfangled world of social marketing.
E&T Plastics has a colorful, frequently updated blog, a very interactive Twitter feed, and a fun Facebook page.
Here's what Pam shared about her social marketing efforts:
Hubspot and MarketingProf are considered to be the two of the best examples of effective B2B social media. Their strategy is quite simple. They write whitepapers and host webinars and online virtual conferences that help their potential customers do their jobs. The information distributed is genuinely useful and valuable to the participants, even if the participant doesn't sign up for any of the hosting firm's services at the end.
This content-distribution strategy may not result in immediate acquisition of new customers, but it will develop a reputation for the hosting firm as an authority in its industry. Therefore, when a company does come across a need for a related service, the firm that established itself as an authority on the matter will come to mind first, and will be quite likely to get the sale in the end. This strategy also works well for lead generation, as the participants need to give their contact information in order to sign up. Again, even if that doesn't result in an immediate sale, the opportunity to make initial contact and a personal introduction from a salesperson could turn out to be profitable later on.
This strategy can be adopted to any industry with a little creativity. For example, Quicken Loans uses social media to distribute a steady stream of valuable information on how people can better manage their money. This increases satisfaction and retention among existing customers and attracts potential new customers.
The most effective part of this strategy is frequency. A steady stream of genuinely useful information, distributed via the company's website, blog, and all social media channels, is essential for establishing credibility in the eyes of the potential customer. If a prospect is visiting your website, blog, or social profile for the very first time, they will be much more likely to engage with you if they can scroll through a history of posts that are chock full of information useful to them. Only then will they click "like" or "follow" or "sign up for our webinar here", and those clicks are the meat and potatoes of your B2B social media success.
One individual brilliantly creative and imaginative B2B social media campaign may immediately increase a company's number of followers; however, those followers will not stay engaged unless they are being supplied with a steady flow of information that is useful to them. Therefore, I believe it to be more effective for the B2B marketer to focus their energy on their pipeline of useful content rather than searching for that one big-bang campaign idea.
Congratulations to John, Jennifer and Pam, and thanks for sharing your ideas with all the Plastics Blog readers. I encourage everyone to click on their links and learn more about their efforts.
The Monterey County Weekly in Seaside, Calif., is unhappy that many restaurants in its circulation area are ignoring local bans on polystyrene take-out containers. So the newspaper has created a database of offenders, and now it is asking readers to help add to the list.
"Nobody likes to tattle on their favorite restaurants. And we understand that in these times, any added expense is hard on business owners," Kera Abraham writes today. "But elected officials - like our own readers - have sent a strong and united message that getting this toxic stuff out of the waste stream (and natural streams) is worth the extra investment."
She writes that as of June 15, 18 local restaurants were apparently violating local PS bans, while 12 were in compliance.
City officials don't really have the time or staff to go around and check on whether restaurants are complying with bans. So if anyone is going to pressure them to do so, it's likely to be local papers like this one, and grassroots environmental groups.
Even if 99 percent of customers don't care if a restaurant is using PS take-out containers, it takes just one complaint to draw attention to an offender.
So while I don't think most patrons would bother to report a violation, this "tattle" strategy could work in towns where the local media embrace the bans.
Business reporter Laura Elder, who wrote the item for her twice-weekly Biz Buzz column, also posted it in her Buzz Blog today, so watch that space, and the blog's comment section, for more speculation on the potential deal.
Jon Huntsman Jr. -- former plastics company executive, governor of Utah and ambassador to China -- is officially in the 2012 race for the GOP nomination for president.
Huntsman made the announcement today at Liberty Park. Check out the video. Pundits say Huntsman is doing his best to evoke the memory of Ronald Reagan, and I think they're right. Even the new commercials showing Huntsman riding a motorcycle through the desert remind me of the old shots of Reagan riding his horse around the ranch in California.
Huntsman isn't the front-runner, and the plastics industry's poor public image isn't his primary problem. But you have to believe he has a chance. The Daily Beast ran a story a few weeks ago, "How Jon Huntsman could win in 2010," that makes his case.
Would you pay $600 to vacuum the carpet at your trade show booth -- just once? That's how much one exhibitor paid at a recent trade show at Chicago's McCormick Place.
Remind anyone of the $345.39 that an exhibitor at NPE famously paid for four cases of Pepsi?
The story goes into detail about the cost of exhibiting at trade shows at McCormick Place. Instead of focusing on just the unions, Crain's Chicago's James Ylisela Jr. spent three months investigating all the issues -- especially the mark-ups charged by general contractors at the show, Freeman and Global Experience Specialists Inc. (GES).
Vlisela also explores the roles that show organizers -- primarily trade associations -- have played in the McCormick costs debate.
Today Crain's Chicago posted an interactive calculator on its web site that allows readers to see how much it would cost to exhibit at the convention center.
Pittsfield, Mass., is well known in plastics circles as the home of Sabic Innovative Plastics --formerly GE Plastics. The city and the company are just about synonymous. So it makes perfect sense that the city, which is celebrating its 250th anniversary, is marking the event with a plastic memento.
The medallions, made of Lexan polycarbonate, "depicts an historic image of Park Square and the old elm tree; the other side commemorates the plastics industry's long and innovative history in Pittsfield."
Sabic donated the resin in three different colors. The medallions will be on sale during the city's "Welcome Back Reunion Weekend," July 1-4, for $3 each, or for $5 with a display sleeve.
Way to embrace that plastics heritage, Pittsfield!
General Motors Co. is honoring the supplier that spearheaded a program to recycle hundreds of miles worth of used oil booms from the Gulf of Mexico and use the material in car parts.
Mobile Fluid Recovery Inc. of Birmingham, Ala., worked with the Detroit-based automaker previously on efforts to clean and recycle rags used during auto production.
The multi-company effort headed by Mobile Fluid Recovery cleaned and recovered more than 200 miles of polypropylene, polyethylene, PVC and other materials from booms used in the 2010 oil spill cleanup in the Gulf.
The plastics were then used in air baffles for the Chevrolet Volt electric car.
GM announced in a June 10 news release that it gave the company is Environmental Excellence Award for providing unique recycling ideas and collaboration on projects.
(Thanks to Rhoda Miel, Plastics News' staff reporter in Detroit, for writing this up).
It's a pleasure to report tonight that Plastics News was honored by the Press Club of Cleveland with two Excellence in Journalism 2011 awards.
The entire Plastics News editorial staff was honored with a second place in the "Best Trade Publication in Ohio" award. PN actually tied with a sister publication, Waste and Recycling News, in the category.
Here's what the judges had to say about PN and WRN: "These publications made it difficult to pick one over the other, as both are jam packed with relevant news for their industry and provide must-have content for their audience."
I couldn't have said it better myself! (First place in the category went to a landscaping magazine).
PN also was honored in the "Departments or Columns" category. I received a second place award for my Viewpoint columns. (First place went to Michael Feuer of Smart Business Cleveland).
It's a treat to be recognized by our peers in journalism for the work we do every day for our readers. Congratulations team!
After I posted a video tour of Marglen Industries' PET recycling plant yesterday, I received an email link to another good recycling plant tour. So today I encourage readers to check out Placon Corp.'s EcoStar recycling plant in Fitchburg, Wis.
Jennifer Mitchell, Placon's marketing communications manager, says the company put together the video to provide a virtual tour the new recycling facility.
"We wanted to show the recycling story, not only tell it," she said. "Our EcoStar facility is unique in its ability to run mixed thermoform bales as well as bottles. Watching how it starts out as dirty plastic and comes out clean food-grade flake is quite the process. There are several washing cycles, sorting processes, metal detectors and even a decontamination process that can only clearly be explained by watching how it flows through."
Mitchell brought up another good reason for companies to create video tours of their plants (I mentioned a few in my blog post yesterday) -- it helps potential customers who have limited travel budgets.
"Many of our customers were interested when we announced we were adding this facility, but with traveling freezes it isn't always possible for companies to come and tour it," she said.
"This video has been used for more than customers though. We showed it at our open house a few weeks ago prior to employees and local community members going through the plant.
"Even with a tour guide it is difficult to hear the step-by-step process so this familiarizes them before they go in and may prompt some additional questions as they go through."
Placon hired a local company in Madison, Wis., to shoot and edit the video.
"We discussed trying to do it ourselves but because of the noise level from the machines it is hard to take a camera through and do it at a level we would be happy with," Mitchell said. "We are very pleased how it turned out and summarizes the story."
I hope the Marglen and Placon examples encourage more plastics processors to look into how they might use video to help promote their companies.
I don't think we're to this point yet, but perhaps it's almost here: At a debate in Aspen, Colo., yesterday on "Rethinking plastics," one participate made the argument that the time for debate is over -- single-use plastics should be banned.
That's the position of David de Rothschild, an environmentalist and author who in 2010 made a trip across the Pacific in a boat made from recycled plastics to raise awareness of ocean debris.
According to this report from The Aspen Times, Rothschild "said the debate is getting bogged down because the American Chemistry Council (ACC) is pumping millions of dollars annually into a campaign to warn people that the 'plastics police' will ruin the economy."
"Rothschild said the argument that banning plastic grocery bags will doom the economy is ridiculous. It will benefit imperiled ocean life and improve the food chain that threatens human health, he claimed," according to Scott Condon's report.
The plastics industry was represented at the debate by Marsha Craig, engineering polymers global business manager for DuPont Co. She's quoted in Condon's report talking about plastics recycling, adding: "I'm an optimist. I think plastics are good. I think they are going to get better."
"This video traces the path that an empty bottles travels, from a bound bale to being made into clean plastic flake that is then heated and converted to make either food-grade [recycled PET] pellets, which are used to make PET containers for food, or rPET fiber which is used in pillows, mattresses and carpeting," said Tom Lauria, IBWA's vice-president of communications
The video highlights the technology used to recycle PET, as well as the persistent issue that recyclers have getting enough bottles to feed their plants.
"We hope that this video will help promote recycling through a better understanding of the need for more recycled material and the useful products that can be made from empty PET bottles," Lauria said.
Other manufacturers might consider doing similar videos to highlight their technology and processes. They could come in handy helping to recruit new talent and in explaining the importance of your business to your community.
I've blogged many times about thieves targeting plastic pallets and crates, and various efforts to foil them. The state of Arizona is raising the ante, with a new law aimed specifically at protecting plastic pallets.
One bottling company executive quoted in the story estimates his firm spends $700,000 replacing pallets that "disappear."
"At night, people go out and scavenge and sell them," said John Kalil, vice president of Kalil Bottling Co. in Tucson. "If you're unemployed, lack cash, have a pickup truck, you're in business. We need something to shut them down."
According to the story, starting July 20 if a company -- for example, a plastics recycler or scrap dealer -- buys more than five pallets at a time that have a company logo, they'll have to collect personal information from the seller, including name, phone number, driver's license and license plate information. The buyers will have to keep the information on file for a year.
The penalty for failing to comply is a fine of up to $30,000.
Some states have similar laws that apply to other frequently stolen recyclables, like copper piping and catalytic converters.
Who's the former plastics exec behind '5-Hour Energy'?
I didn't know until today that Manoj Bhargava, CEO of Living Essentials LLC, maker of the popular 5-Hour Energy drink, has a background in the plastics industry.
The news comes from Plastics News' sister publication Crain's Detroit Business, which has a story on Bhargava's new $100 million venture fund.
According to PN's story archives, Bhargava was formerly the majority owner of Prime PVC Inc., a Marion, Ind., compounder that was purchased by investment firm Spell Capital Partners LLC in 2007.
Crain's Detroit reporters Daniel Duggan and Dustin Walsh pieced together a story on Bhargava -- a difficult task, since he is not well known and has done few interviews.
"In 1998, he started Innovative Ventures LLC after he bought the formula for a drug for hangovers from a New Jersey chemist," they wrote. "The product was later named Chaser and was the start of Bhargava's success. He created Living Essentials as a new arm to market Chaser."
In December he spoke at a Beverage Digest conference, where he said the company had exceeded $1 billion in sales since it was introduced in 2004, $500 million of which from 2009.
Bhargava's investment venture is already giving him a higher profile in Michigan business circles. The co-founder of the initiative is Tom LaSorda, former CEO of Chrysler Group LLC.
NewsChannel 8 in Washington is reporting that 38 percent of the business there are not complying with the city's 5-cent-per-bag tax on single-use plastic and paper grocery bags.
The station's report quotes an unidentified official with the district's ">Department of the Environment who has been visiting stores as a "secret shopper" to check on whether they're complying with the law.
My question: Why are they failing to comply?
According to the story, the problem is that stores "simply don't understand" the law. Also, many shoppers don't understand that the law applies to businesses like sporting goods stores and hot dog stands.
This is something other cities mulling bag taxes will have to consider -- there will be a cost associated with enforcing the law, even if it's just aimed at educating retailers.
Some technology-related websites are buzzing that the new white iPhone 4 is 0.2 millimeters thicker than the black model. (Don't believe me? Do a Google search on "0.2 millimeters.")
Blogger Ryan Cash first noticed the difference when the white version of the phone came out in late April. He actually noticed that it felt thicker, so he measured both versions. Cash works in marketing for Marketcircle, a company that makes business apps for Mac, iPhone, and iPad.
At first Apple tried to dismiss the story. Senior Vice President Phil Schiller tweeted: "It is not thicker, don't believe all the junk that you read."
But the story wouldn't go away, so Apple finally tried to explain -- while emphasizing that 0.2 millimeters really doesn't make a difference, even to iPhone accessory manufacturers.
Some of you are probably thinking, "it's because the white ones are painted." But PC Magazine points out that "a coat of paint is so thin, thinner than a human hair ... it wouldn't account for anything more than a couple of thousands of a millimeter."
It turns out that the thickness issue is actually related to the plastic case. The white iPhone does have some design and engineering difference from the black model. But the bottom line is that there are small -- and apparently unintentional -- differences in the injection tooling used to mold the cases.
PC Magazine calls the issue "Sizegate," but it's clearly tongue in cheek. Peter Pachal, the website's news director, writes that Apple must have been aware of the difference, but officials decided that because it had no practical effect, they didn't need to say anything.
"Given that there haven't been any reports of people lining up to return cases they bought for their white iPhones, you could conclude (rightly) that a difference of 0.15 millimeters simply isn't a big deal after all," he writes.
"'Sizegate' certainly isn't on par with the iPhone 4's antenna problems that plagued the phone upon its initial release. But for anyone who's ever looked at a spec sheet as definitive, it's a reminder that every number cited is really just an average, and your mileage may vary. Sometimes a lot," Pachal said.
Maybe a molder making a case for a high-end product like the iPhone doesn't have to worry too much about a few extra grams of plastic. But I doubt it.
If you've ever been to the finish line at a marathon -- at least in a cold-weather location like Cleveland -- you know that runners wrap themselves in disposable blankets that look like giant pieces of aluminum foil to stay warm after the long race.
But runners don't tend to like to carry a lot of extra gear, so most of the blankets are discarded at the end of the day.
Let's see, we've got a relatively large volume of a material made of an identical material -- This sounds like an opportunity for a recycler, right? You've got it.
Today AFM Inc., the manufacturer of Heatsheets-brand blankets, announced that it worked with wood-plastic composite decking and railing manufacturer Trex Co. Inc. to recycle the finish line blankets from the Greater Washington Sports Alliance's SunTrust National Marathon on March 26.
According to the companies, this was the first race to participate in the new program, which allows events of any size to recycle and repurpose their Heatsheets thermal-reflective finish line blankets at Trex collection facilities across the country for transformation into durable decking and railing products.
"The Blankets to Boards program allowed us to easily recycle our Heatsheets, reduce our event's waste and improve our environmental impact while still providing the finish line blankets that runners need, especially on a cold day," said Daniella Levy, event manager for the Greater Washington Sports Alliance and finish line director for the SunTrust National Marathon.
With temperatures dipping into the low 30s during the marathon, the Greater Washington Sports Alliance provided 12,000 Heatsheets to runners. Approximately 2,000 - or 16 percent - were returned for recycling.
The sheets, which are made of low density polyethylene, were taken to a local Safeway store, then sent on to Trex.
Did you know that plastic food is a big business in Japan, and it's growing in China? This surprised me, but it's the topic of an informative report on the OddityCentral blog -- complete with some great photos of some realistic-looking plastic food.
According to the report, Japanese restaurants started to use wax models of meals in 1917, and eventually manufacturers shifted to plastic. The manufacturing process is pretty complicated:
Restaurants send fake food makers the exact item they want replicated, along with photos. Silicon is poured around and over the disk and solidifies into a mold, which is then filled with liquid plastic and cooked in an oven. Then comes the really hard part - getting the details right. Oil based paints, regular brushes, air brushes, knives and carving tools are all part of fake food artist's arsenal, but they all keep their techniques a secret.
Maiduru Corp. is one of the big players in the market, check out their website for more photos of plastic food.
According to Wikipedia.com, which actually has a listing for "Fake food in Japan" (isn't the web wonderful?), Japanese makers of plastic food now are targeting restaurants overseas, including in China.
But I'm not sure it will be in the ways they intended.
The Xtranormal video is a make-believe interview of a chemical company spokesman by a mom who apparently has her own late-night TV talk show.
The chemical guy says ridiculous things like "toxic chemicals are perfectly safe already. The real problem is people who worry too much," and "scientists worry too much, they're scaring people with too many facts."
The interview concludes when the mom offers the chemical industry guy a drink from "a plastic water bottle made by your company. It contains chemicals that have been shown to lower sperm counts."
Not exactly a fair debate.
The video equates the plastics bottle maker with the chemical industry, and personifies industry with a PR-speaking buffoon who says one ridiculous thing after another.
For readers who want to dig deeper than what the video offers, the Safer Chemicals/Healthy Families blog does offer more information on bisphenol A safety in its "resources" section. The information is even presented pretty fairly, considering it's specifically there to convince the public to lobby Congress for tighter regulations on BPA.
It's another interesting example of how the debate on plastics and chemicals safety is playing out in social media, with easy-to-use tools like blogs, YouTube and Xtranormal.
Congratulations to Trexel Inc., which on May 11 received a 2011 Smaller Business Innovation Award from the Smaller Business Association of New England (SBANE).
The NEIA program recognizes companies that have transformed innovative ideas into products and services that deliver proven value to customers.
Steve Braig, president & CEO of Trexel, said in a news release: "This is a great honor for our company, as nearly 200 companies competed in this year's competition. It's a testament to the hard work and dedication of our employees, who continue to build a strong, innovative and rapidly-growing global business in the plastics industry."
Trexel is well known in plastics circles for its MuCell microcellular foaming technology, which allows injection molders to make parts faster and using less material with enhanced dimensional stability.
Trexel was one of nine companies honored this year, and the only plastics firm.
(Two other winners have tangential plastics connections: Biovation LLC, a Boothbay, Maine, company that develops non-woven fiber products with antimicrobial properties for food packaging, wound care and customer OEM applications; and TEI Biosciences Inc., a Boston biomedical company that makes devices used for soft tissue repairs).
Cascade reports on environmental and social progress
Injection molder Cascade Engineering Inc. is continuing its annual report on its "triple bottom line," noting its efforts in promoting environmental and social progress as well as economics.
The Grand Rapids, Mich.-based firm recently released details for 2010, which are available as a pdf file here.
Cascade notes its continued reduction in waste going to landfills, its use of post-consumer recycled content and investments in solar as well as wind power. The company's welfare-to-work program averaged a 97.13 percent retention rate, while Cascade's pink trash carts -- which support breast cancer awareness programs -- are now available in 35 states.
The report also notes new efforts for 2010. Cascade -- aided by donations from Dow Chemical Co. and other groups -- worked with the U.S. Navy to send 1,000 large scale water filters to Haiti following the earthquake there.
"The U.S. Navy's Project Handclasp provided the logistics to get the filters transported to Haiti and through customs. Another willing partner, Pure Water For The World, was waiting on the ground in Haiti to begin installations while our local neighbor, Amway, provided chlorinators and de-chlorinators to make the filters work immediately," the report notes.
"Since the original filters were installed, we have continued to receive emails, pictures and stories about how the filters have impacted lives. In one orphanage, many children used to be seriously ill from the water, but thanks to the filter they are no longer at risk due to unsafe drinking water. Our filter was even profiled on a CNN broadcast. The Navy has also shared with us that it is the, 'No. 1 requested item on all of the ships,' because of its effectiveness and the positive impact it has on people's lives."
CK Technologies also joined an outreach program working with the Toledo Correctional Institution inmates while Cascade also participated in two different youth job mentoring programs.
Yash Awasthi, vice president of operations at PET resin manufacturer AlphaPet Inc., had a first-hand experience with a line of storms and tornadoes that hit the company's Decatur, Ala., plant on April 27.
His story is so powerful that I'm sharing it with Plastics Blog readers. It's very interesting to see how a company dealt with the disaster, as well as the local and corporate response in the aftermath. Perhaps it will help other companies with their disaster preparedness planning.
Here's Awasthi's story:
"It was a day of tornado warnings: 141 warnings, one after the other. The weathermen had predicted damaging winds throughout the day. The first siren went off at 10:00 am and all of us evacuated the plant and gathered at the designated spot next to the break room. After a while, we received the all clear signal and went back to our work areas. At 11:15 I got a grim forecast of what was about to happen. One of the DCS operators was watching the rooftop security camera and spotted a twister north of us and alerted everybody of the impending danger. We began to hear about the tornados on the radio. Normally, we would have waited for the siren, but as I looked out of my window and saw the menacing dark clouds, I ordered everyone in the trailer to rush to the evacuation site. It was almost too late.
"Gas cylinders came flying toward us as we made a sprint for the Utility building. Everyone made it to shelter without injury. Heavy rain and golf ball-sized hail hammered the building. The storm passed and during the calm weathermen announced that even more powerful storms were expected in the afternoon. The schools announced that they would dismiss early. It was then that we decided to send as many people home as we could to take care of their families as well as reduce the number of people on site.
"It was 4:15pm when the next big twister came our way after decimating three communities about five miles away. The tornado passed just northwest of the BP facility, about a mile from us, and badly damaged several companies across the road - literally demolishing everything in its path, including the 500KV power lines that supply much of the power to northern Alabama. Power failed immediately and we were left huddled inside the process building next to the break room in the dark. We held each other and prayed.
"It was at this point that we realized that nothing could be done to deal with the forces of nature. In total darkness, everyone had to sit for the next two hours as the storm whooped and whined outside relentlessly. Just after 7:00pm the weather subsided and it was safe for us to go outside. Portable generators were arranged to try and drain the polymer in the process lines but all the lines in the plant had frozen. In the early morning hours we realized this was going to be a lengthy and complex process. We decided to call everything off and wait for the resumption of power. The shift crew did an excellent job of making sure everybody was safe.
"The next day we made calls to the homes of all our employees to find out if they were okay. Fortunately, all employees and their immediate families were safe although some had lost some of their extended family members. Around 252 people died in Alabama during those storms when 21 tornados hit the state. Five employees suffered extensive damage to their homes, though there was no appreciable damage to AlphaPet.
"Frantically, we struggled to get generators on site to hasten the plant's restart process. It was quite a scramble to locate large enough generators but our team did a great job in locating the type we needed. Our colleagues over at Starpet in North Carolina pitched in, to our eternal gratitude. Power was restored after a week and the start up activities commenced.
"All around Alabama it was like living in the Stone Age once again. No power in over 650,000 homes, no gasoline, no shops, no communications - yes, no internet, TV or phones - and limited water supply. Food in the refrigerator started spoiling. Everyone started having cook-outs in the evenings to use it all up.
"Finally, power in our homes was restored after about 5 days. As a humanitarian effort we have extended some financial support to employees who suffered damage to their homes and some support to the other employees who faced particular hardship. Food was arranged at the plant for the workers who were helping to restore things back to normal. Our PET CEO, Mr. Dilip Kumar Agarwal, flew in to speak with the shift crew on Sunday May 8 and offer some comfort. His sincere empathy was felt by everyone. The BP Chemicals site next to us also offered excellent support throughout and we thank them for this gesture."
Why are design experts obsessed with coffee cup lids?
Every once in a while I run across the blog post so complete and entertaining that it leaves me with almost nothing to add. That's the case today with Nicola Twilley's post on TheAtlantic.com, "The Rise of the Plastic, Disposable Coffee Cup Lid."
Twilley covers the history and industrial design highlights of the lowly coffee cup lid, with special attention to the Solo Traveler, a favorite of some industrial design experts. But she doesn't stop there.
Despite the Solo Traveler's celebrity status, to my mind, these lids are most interesting when considered as a group, unified by function and yet differentiated in form. Patton, Harpman, and others have traced their design evolution over time, from the 'primitive days' of simple vented plastic circles, through the invention of the sip tab, to the multi-functional straw/sip-through domes of today.
She cites an I.D. Magazine feature story by design historian and author Phil Patton, who had a collection of more than 30 lids that was once on display at the Cincinnati Art Museum.
A lid also was featured in a 2004 exhibit titled "Humble Masterpieces" at the Museum of Modern Art.
Check TheAtlantic.com for all of Twilley's research, and enjoy her links.
Get ready to meet "Kai," a real goldfish that is the centerpiece of a social media-focused ad campaign designed to raise awareness of plastic marine debris.
The campaign, on behalf of Project Kaisei, a non-profit ocean cleanup initiative, was created by advertising agency Cohn & Wolfe.
The plan? They're putting "Kai" (pronounced KÄ«) in a fish tank filled with plastic trash. Starting today, for the next 30 days, the sponsors will stream live video of the tank on the "Kai's Home" Facebook page.
In order to "Save Kai" and remove plastic from his tank, Facebook friends can make donations to the project. As donations increase, plastic debris will be removed.
"With this campaign we want to help people around the world to understand the impact of plastic pollution in the ocean and rethink our use of materials that end up there as debris," said Doug Woodring, co-founder of Project Kaisei.
Cohn & Wolfe prepared the campaign as part of a pro-bono partnership with Project Kaisei -- the goal was to create a project that would cost just $1,000, be orchestrated in 30 days, and raise 10 times that amount to help fund Project Kaisei's next ocean expedition.
"This was a creative exercise to push our people's thinking to the outer limits, giving them almost no money or time to design a program that would accomplish something rewarding. Who knew the idea would center on a single goldfish? We know people will donate to help save Kai," said Cohn & Wolfe Chief Creative Catalyst Jeremy Baka.
The Plastics Blog is pleased and humbled to be included on "50 Best Blogs for Industrial Design Students," a list put together by OnlineUniversities.com.
The list is described as "50 blogs that anyone interested in learning more about great product design should check out, with news, stunning photos and tips that can help you improve your skills in the field."
There are also blogs listed under the "General Design," "Inspiration," "Designers and Firms," "The Business of Design" and "Niche" categories.
The Plastics Blog is in that last category, with this description: "So much of what we use and what you'll be designing will require plastics. Why not learn a bit more about it now? Start with this blog."
In the wake of natural disasters we often see US plastics companies lend a hand, donating money, plastic sheeting and bottled water. Now, following the storms and tornadoes that hit the South on April 28-29, the shoe is on the other foot.
According to Alabama Atty. Gen. Luther Strange, the government of Japan has donated 150 "huge pieces of plastic sheeting," as well as 8,000 blankets, to the state's tornado victims -- even as Japan itself is recovering from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
"As I have traveled throughout Alabama this last week visiting with people who are struggling from the tornado damage, I can assure that these supplies are greatly needed and will be much appreciated by our people. This gesture is a sign of the goodwill between our countries, for which we are thankful," Strange said.
Takuji Hanatani, consul general of Japan, at the Japanese Consulate in Atlanta; and Keiichiro Nakazawa, chief representative of the Japan International Cooperation Agency in Washington, represented the Japanese government at a recent ceremony in Alabama.
The other day at Antec, someone asked a question during my panel discussion about how plastics recycling could be more like aluminum. The question kicked off a good discussion on the differences between the materials.
Today the "Save the Plastics" blog posted an item on high density polyethylene recycling that, if I'd seen it last week, I could have cited it as a source. So for the benefit of everyone, I'll share it here.
According to the blog, recycling HDPE makes great sense these days, in part because of the high costs of energy and virgin resin.
Here's the part that reminded me of aluminum: according to the post, "converting previously used HDPE plastic into resin uses 90 percent less energy than virgin resin to produce."
On the aluminum side, we've often seen the claim that recycling scrap aluminium requires only 5 percent of the energy used to make new aluminium.
Of course aluminum is more expensive than plastic, so the comparison isn't perfect. But that's a great fact that Plastics Blog readers can cite in support of the commercial viability of plastics recycling.
I'm at the Society of Plastics Engineers' Antec 2011 conference today in Boston. My head is just spinning a bit after sitting in on forums with names like "High temperature polyimide film for roll-to-roll copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) deposition."
All good stuff, and thoroughly researched. I love how the Q&A after a technical presentation can be so specific -- or how sometimes an entire roomful of experts has no questions at all!
SPE provided some facts and figures today about the conference:
Experts will make more than 700 presentations at 108 topical sessions this year.
Paper and presentation submissions were up 25 percent from 2010 levels.
Student presentations have hit a 10+ year high.
If you forgot about Antec and still want to come, there's plenty of time. The conference continues Tuesday and Wednesday at the Hynes Convention Center in Boston.
Next year, Antec will take place April 2-4 in Orlando, Fla., in conjunction with the NPE 2010 trade show.
There's a spirited discussion about BPA safety and science reporting taking place in Milwaukee this week. One point that it reinforces to me: If you want to get a journalist's attention, attack his ethics.
Jon Entine, director of the Genetic Literacy Project at STATS, writes about the controversy today in The American, the Journal of the American Enterprise Insititute.
The post, headlined "Milwaukee's Best No Longer," goes into detail about the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's coverage of a report about BPA safety by the German Society of Toxicology.
(Entine first gave the German report a wider audience last week, as I covered in this previous post).
I've been watching the Journal Sentinel's coverage on its web site this week. Even before I saw Entine's post today, I thought the debate was quite interesting.
There's obviously disagreement about BPA safety between the paper's news reporters and editors and a conservative columnist. The dispute seems to have spilled over into the paper's own web site, with a spirited debate in the comments section.
I won't recap everything here -- check Entine's post for the full story and his links.
I doubt this will be the last word on the issue. The Journal Sentinel has put a lot of resources behind its BPA reporting. So I expect it will take steps to defend its credibility.
It will be interesting to see if, in the end, the paper decides to keep both of its conflicting "voices" that it has speaking about BPA -- its news reporters and editors, and its conservative columnist.
Plastic bag bans and taxes remain hot issues. Five U.S. communities have approved bans so far this year. And the state of Oregon could be next.
The Oregon legislature is considering a bill that would ban plastic bags. The industry is fighting back, and now residents are hearing radio ads urging legislators to reject the bill.
Plastics News staff reporter Mike Verespej wrote last month about the pro-bag effort, spearheaded by major bag maker Hilex Poly Co. LLC.
The company created a website -- www.bagthebanoregon.com -- in addition to bankrolling radio and newspaper ads, and submitting editorial page columns to newspapers around the state.
I thought it would be interesting to share the radio ads with Plastics Blog readers, so here's a link to the "bagthebanoregon" multimedia page with the latest spots.
To summarize, the ads stress pretty strongly that if the ban passes, grocery prices would go up -- not a popular consequence in Oregon's troubled economy.
The ads also touch on some other hot buttons likely to appeal to some voters: Doesn't the legislature have more important issues to deal with? A ban would threaten U.S. jobs -- they even call them "green jobs." Reusable bags aren't as clean as single-use bags.
These are arguments that we'll likely see repeated elsewhere around the country, anywhere that a serious bag ban proposal surfaces.
The economic angle has been successful before -- voters aren't likely to support proposals that hit them in the pocketbook. Will that strategy work in Oregon?
You might not expect an interview with an environmental activist to include comments like "Plastic can be an incredibly reusable, resilient, sustainable material."
Joe Fassler has a nice Q&A interview with Rothschild on The Atlantic's web site today.
I've blogged about Rothschild's mission before -- about the little boat made of recycled PET bottles, and about his effort to promote a recycled PET resin called Seretex. So we won't cover that again.
But the entire interview is very much focused on plastics, so I'll encourage you to click the link, while teasing you with a couple of the questions and Rothschild's answers:
Why do you think the plastic industry hasn't tapped into long-term use for its plastics? Wouldn't it make their own products more valuable?
"No. It's the high-volume, high-consumption model. The margins on a straw, say, are tiny. They want to sell 60 billion straws every year to make their profits, as opposed to something where you buy one, and that's it. It's not in the interest of the plastic industry to make products that are reusable and last longer when they're making money on high-volume, low-margin products, and churn, and consumption. It's an age-old problem: we live in a disposable society. At one point, it was a sign of affluence, I guess. These days, we've become highly suspicious of hygiene--so we use plastic forks once and throw them out. And we're hooked on convenience."
It's interesting that plastic is both villain and hero of your story. Yes, plastic's a dangerous, ubiquitous pollutant--but it's also a useful industrial material with vast untapped sustainable-design potential. How should we feel about it?
"I think we have to recognize that plastic's not going to disappear any time soon, and we've got learn to live with the consequences of our modern materials. Plastic can be an incredibly reusable, resilient, sustainable material. It can be the right material. Look at the number of applications--you're sitting on a plastic phone, writing notes on a plastic computer, using a plastic pen to draw up some other notes. When you look around, you see how ubiquitous it is. It's probably the most ubiquitous of all man-made materials."
Cigarette butts are a big component of litter, but they are difficult to deal with and often overlooked. Blake Burich, from the Columbus suburb of Dublin, Ohio, thinks he has a solution.
Burich's company, InnovaGreen Systems, is touting a process for turning the cellulose acetate butts into a material that can be used to make new products.
The Columbus Dispatch published a feature story on Burich a few weeks ago.
According to the story, Burich has patented a process to recycle the filters by mixing them with different solvents, creating plastics with a range of properties. The company is still a part-time, R&D-phase operation.
"I work on this thing from Saturday morning to Sunday night a lot of times," Burich told the Dispatch's Robert Vitale. "We're a bunch of guys who want to do something to improve Mother Earth."
Burich's current project is to create a sculpture for the city of Columbus using butts collected by volunteers.
This may be one of the oddest materials I've ever seen recycled -- and I once visited a plant that was trying to recycle disposable diapers.
If you're wondering how environmentalists feel about Coca-Cola Co.'s PlantBottle -- PET and HDPE containers made in-part from bio-based raw materials ... well, let's say it's not completely positive.
The Earth Resource Foundation sent a news release today after some of them received an invitation to an Earth Day event to launch Coke's Dasani-brand bottled water in a PET PlantBottle.
The release, titled "No Glee from Environmentalists for Coca-Cola 'PlantBottle'," takes the company to task. Much of the critcism could apply to any bottled water manufacturer, but a few of the points are specific to the PlantBottle material:
We Regret that despite your green leaf logo, your "plant bottle" is still just a PET plastic bottle and is not biodegradable or compostable on land or at sea.
We Regret that Coca-Cola will not be collecting and recycling their own PET "plant bottles," and that only approximately 20.9% percent of PET bottles are "recycled" (mostly into lower grade material that is not used in bottles again) in America. The remainder, at over 20 billion bottles, last forever in our landfills or in our environment, including our oceans. We also regret that Coca-Cola failed to achieve it's own pledge of using at least 10% recycled content in PET bottles and has just announced the shut down of it's PET recycling joint venture in South Carolina.
We Regret that Coca-Cola is substituting its chemical-laden petroleum plastic bottle with a chemical-laden petroleum and plant plastic bottle.
We Regret that estrogenic compounds in your PET "plant bottle" may leach into the water and impair human health and reproduction.
The release is in the form of a petition, and is signed by a number of leaders of California-based environmental groups.
While the petition does not link to Plastics News, we are the source of the information about Coke's recycling plant in South Carolina. For that story, check out this news story (which was updated today), as well as this interview with Coke's Scott Vitters.
Remember the paper "bottle" that Ecologic Brands Inc. rolled out last month for its Seventh Generation laundry detergent? A sustainability consultant blogged today about how he is disappointed in the package.
Paul Smith, the founder of GreenSmith Consulting, wrote that "there was something about the design that missed the mark, on a psychological level. The lack of handle made it feel strange to hold. It was only then that I realized how crucial a handle is to my laundry detergent paradigm. The package utilizes pressed recycled paper, which makes the inclusion of a handle quite a challenge."
He added that the sample bottle he received leaked, and he also was critical of the company's claim about how much plastic it was saving.
That's blasphemy to some in a city that's proud of its environmental legacy. (Among other things, the city is home to the University of California at Santa Barbara's Bren School of Environmental Science & Management.)
According to the Sound's report, a majority of the city's ordinance committee support a plan to voluntarily reduce single-use plastic bag consumption, and encourage residents to use reusable bags.
Kathi King of the Santa Barbara Community Environmental Council likened the defense of the plastic bag industry to those defending tobacco companies, according to Joshua Molina's report.
With that level of rhetoric, watch for sparks to fly as the City Council continues its debate on plastic bag bans.
Apollo Global Management LLC, a private equity firm with major plastics holdings, is now a publicly traded company. The firm held an initial public offering on March 30.
The company owns stakes in a wide variety of companies in many industries -- plastics are a small part of the pie.
Nevertheless, Apollo highlighted some plastics operations in a footnote in its S-1 statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The footnote is titled "Our Investment Edge Creates Proprietary Investment Opportunities," and it highlights the firm's ability to take advantage of its expertise in certain businesses.
"Recent examples include the creation of Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc., a $5 billion chemical company and Berry Plastics, a $3 billion plastic packaging company, both of which we have built through multiple acquisitions in our core industry verticals," the S-1 says.
Is public concern about bisphenol A safety rooted in science, or in poor journalism? According to Jon Entine, director of the Genetic Literacy Project at STATS, the problem lies with ink-stained wretches (like me).
Entine wrote a blistering column for The American, the Journal of the American Enterprise Insititute, where he pronounces BPA safe and says the problem is that journalists have an anti-plastics bias.
His latest example: the lack of coverage of a comprehensive review of BPA safety from the German Society of Toxicology, which concluded that "[BPA] exposure represents no noteworthy risk to the health of the human population, including newborns and babies."
"Although this evaluation is noteworthy because of its prestigious authorship, it will come as news only to those who ... well, it will probably come as news to almost all readers," Entine wrote. "Many journalists long ago signed the 'plastics are dangerous' pledge and have ignored the slew of recent comprehensive international meta-reviews that contradicted that narrative."
STATS is affiliated with the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.
Pour yourself a cup of melted butter and check out this story about University of Maine researchers who are using lobster shells to mold biodegradable golf balls.
The best parts: the lobster-dervived balls are made from a waste material, and they may be cheaper to make than biodegradable golf balls already on the market.
In conjunction with the Lobster Institute, Professor David Neivandt and undergraduate student Alex Caddell developed the technology.
These balls aren't meant for the PGA Tour, or even for duffers like me. The ball was created for use on cruise ships.
According to the university, the balls are the first to be made with crushed lobster shells with a biodegradable binder and coating. The shells would otherwise end up in a landfill.
Biodegradable golf balls now on the market retail for just under $1 per ball. The raw materials for the lobster shell balls cost as little as 19 cents each.
"The flight properties are amazing," Caddell told the university. "It doesn't fly quite as far as a regular golf ball, but we're actually getting a similar distance to other biodegradable golf balls."
UMaine has filed a provisional patent for the lobster-shell mixture, which can also be used for such products as plant pots that decompose in the ground, surveying stakes and other applications.
Grossman clearly explains which plastics, and what sorts of products, may contain BPA. She also gives some detail on the current status of BPA regulation and legislation. This story goes beyond the typical news report on BPA safety.
She cites Eastman's Tritan copolyester as a material being marketed as a BPA-free alternative to polycarbonate, but without the long history of testing.
"The point is not to single out the Eastman Chemical Co. or Tritan copolyester, which may be entirely environmentally benign, but to highlight the dilemma we're in when it comes to assessing the safety of new materials," she writes.
"Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the U.S. law that regulates chemicals in commerce, it's entirely permissible to launch a new material into high-volume production without disclosing its precise chemical identity or any information about its toxicity.
"This makes it impossible for the public to assess product safety independently of manufacturer claims. And currently, despite EPA and FDA policies that support 'safe' alternatives to a chemical of concern like BPA, neither federal agency conducts safety testing of new materials destined for consumer products before they come on the market."
Grossman concludes that the U.S. needs a better system for testing new materials before they become commercially available.
As an observer (but not a participant) of the process for winning food-contact approval, I think she implies too strongly that FDA approval is simple. But it's still a thought-provoking story that will likely get some attention, since BPA remains a material in the headlines.
Roz Savage: Another ocean voyager focused on plastics
Blog readers will recall the Plastiki and Project Kaisei ocean voyages, which aimed to increase public awareness of plastic marine debris. Somehow I missed another adventurer with a similar goal -- Roz Savage, a British woman who had already rowed across the Atlantic Ocean.
This week Savage set off from Australia to row across the Indian Ocean. She's traveling alone in the 23-foot boat on a 4,000-mile journey that should take about four months.
She has an interesting story, which she shares on her web site. Here's a taste:
It was the year 2000, I was 33 years old, and I seemed to have the perfect life. I had a job, a husband, a home, a little red sports car.
In theory, I should have been happy.
Fast forward to March 2006. I am 38, divorced, homeless, and alone in a tiny rowing boat in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. My last hot meal was two months ago, before my camping stove broke. My stereo is bust. I've had no human contact since my satellite phone stopped working several weeks ago. All four of my oars are broken and I've had to patch them up with duct tape and makeshift splints. I have tendonitis in my shoulders and saltwater sores on my backside.
I have battled twenty-foot waves, sleep deprivation, self-doubt and depression. But I have never been happier.
They said I was crazy. They said I wasn't big enough, not tall enough, not strong enough.
But at last, after three thousand miles and 103 days at sea, I am about to accomplish my goal. I am proving that anybody can achieve the extraordinary, if only they have enough guts and determination and sheer bloody-mindedness to see it through.
I am realizing my dream, one stroke at a time.
Her mission is less focused on plastics than the Plastiki and Project Kaisei voyages, which is probably how she's escaped my notice until now. But banning plastics is part of Savage's message.
"Although every action counts, some actions count more than others. The further up the ladder of engagement we move, the more powerful our actions become," she writes. "For example, saying no to plastic - that's at the consumer level. Canvassing the neighborhood to get bags out of the local grocery store - that's the distribution level. Petitioning legislation to outlaw plastic bag production and voting reaches the manufacturing and extraction level. With each level upstream the effectiveness magnifies exponentially. Upstream actions pay off more, but no action is too small, and every action fits and has a purpose and helps us reach a better place."
Savage's trip should generate plenty of publicity -- her website explains her media strategy (PDF), as well as a solicitation for corporate sponsors.
Getting abundant natural gas through hydraulic fracturing contributes to global warming as much as coal, if not more, according to a study quoted by political news website TheHill.com.
The [greenhouse gas] footprint for shale gas is greater than that for conventional gas or oil when viewed on any time horizon, but particularly so over 20 years. Compared to coal, the footprint of shale gas is at least 20 percent greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon and is comparable when compared over 100 years.
The study will run in the journal Climatic Change, according to the E2 blog.
The blog quotes an expert from an energy consulting firm -- with clients in the natural gas industry -- who questions Howarth's study study.
This isn't decades down the road, either -- in the past month, three ethylene projects have been announced in North America to take advantage of the newfound supplies of natural gas in the region.
Tom Nosker, a plastics recycling expert long affiliated with Rutgers University, is featured in the April issue of Inventors Digest magazine. Nosker is being recognized as a mechanical engineers whose problem-solving skills touch our daily lives.
"It's a great honor for any group of peers to recognize one's work, and this is no exception," Nosker said in a news release. "Since my undergraduate days I've dedicated my career to finding a solution to the large amounts of waste that normally end up in landfills. If we can continue to search for innovative ways to convert garbage to useful products or energy, we're going to find ourselves a lot closer to solving some of the world's most pressing environmental and sustainability issues. And the solutions aren't hard to find. They just take creativity, dedication and sometimes a little luck. Okay, maybe a lot of luck."
Inventors Digest selected Nosker and five other mechancial engineers "based on peer recognition, societal impact of their work and commitment to their craft."
Today Nosker is also working with Axion International Inc. on using recycled plastics to replace wood and other traditional materials in applications such as railway ties and bridges.
It's hard to believe that Plastics News has been writing about Tom Nosker for more than 20 years.
At the risk of giving readers the impression that Ford vehicles are made of mushrooms and recycled carpeting, here's another post on how the automaker is highlighting its use of sustainable materials.
Ford Motor Co. today put out a news release on how it is using EcoLon nylon, made from 100 percent recycled carpet, to make cylinder head covers.
Ford said the cover is "the first automotive product of its kind manufactured from post-consumer recycled nylon," and is used in the Escape, Fusion, Mustang and F-150
To date, the program has saved more than 4.1 million pounds of carpet from landfills, the equivalent of nearly 154 football fields.
"By working with Wellman and Dana, Ford has found a way to bring green applications to a new, unique location in our vehicles," said Brett Hinds, Ford manager, engine design. "This single use has made an incredible impact, and we're continuing to look for ways to expand the use."
Just how much does Ford like mushroom-based plastics?
Ford Motor Co. has a well documented history of using bio-based polymers. But mushrooms? That's the word from Ecovative Design LLC, a Green Island, N.Y.-based company that makes polymers from agricultural waste.
The news is all over the environmental blogs this week. This one is reporting that Deborah Mielewski, head of Ford's plastic research department, is interested in using Ecovative's mushroom foam "to replace 30 pounds of each car's petroleum-based foams with more environmentally sensible alternatives."
I was surprised to see the story explode in blogland. I had to go back a few days to find the source. It was this press release announcing that Mielewski and Ford research engineer Angela Harris will give presentations at the upcoming BioPlastek 2011 Forum, set for June 27-29 in New York.
"Ms. Harris' presentation will outline Ford's R&D process for finding and developing novel bio-based material solutions that meet the rigorous requirements for automotive, highlighting key technical obstacles that must be overcome before widespread usage of these materials takes place," the release said.
Ford was the first major automaker in North America to begin using soy foam blends (in the Mustang), and the company has also used natural fiber-reinforced composites. It will be interesting to see just how committed Ford will be to using mushroom-based plastics.
For more about Ecovative Design, check out this video. Note that co-founder and CEO Eben Bayer isn't a big fan of polystyrene, and he makes a special effort to call the company's Ecocradle a "polymer," rather than a bio-based plastic.
Plastics aren't the focus, but the recently announced $9.7 billion purchase of specialty chemicals maker Lubrizol Corp. by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. is the subject of intense media scrutiny today.
David Sokol, a top Berkshire Hathaway executive, has resigned amidst controversy involving his purchase of Lubrizol shares prior to mentioning the company to Warren Buffett as a takeover candidate.
For those who don't recall, here's the plastics angle: Lubrizol generates about 30 percent of its sales and about 20 percent of its operating income from its Advanced Materials unit, which includes its market-leading Estane-brand thermoplastic polyurethane. Lubrizol acquired the business -- then known as Noveon -- for $1.4 billion in 2004 from private equity firm AEA Investors Inc.
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission issued an alert today urging consumers not to use plastic water walking balls, because of the potential to suffocate or drown.
"CPSC has informed state amusement ride officials of the risks associated with this product and encourages state officials not to permit this ride in their state," the agency said in a March 31 news release. "CPSC does not know of any safe way to use this product."
According to the agency, at least some of the balls have no emergency exit and can be opened only by a person outside of the ball.
An individual climbs into the large, see-through plastic ball; it is inflated with a blower through the zipper opening; and the zipper is closed, making the ball air-tight. The ball, with the person locked inside, then rolls around on a number of surfaces, including water, ice, or grass. The product is most commonly used by children and is used mainly as a ride in amusement parks, carnivals, malls, sporting events and other high-traffic areas. The product is also sold directly to the public for personal use.
Several states have banned or refused to provide permits for rides that use this product. CPSC is aware of two incidents involving this product. In one incident, a child was found unresponsive after being inside the ball for a very brief period of time, and emergency medical treatment was sought. In the second incident, a person inside of a ball suffered a fracture when the ball fell out of the shallow, above-ground pool onto the hard ground.
Forget about Libya, the budget deficit and Social Security. Some pundits think they can swing a U.S. House of Representatives election by focusing on the polystyrene vs. compostable foodservice debate.
You'll recall that this issue popped up in February, when the new GOP-controlled House decided to stop using compostable foodservice products in its cafeteria, and went back to using PS.
Today the political newspaper Roll Callis reporting that some California Democrats think the issue may be enough to beat Rep. Dan Lungren -- one of the architects of the move to PS -- in his 2012 relection race.
They've even given Lungren a new nickname: "Styrofoam Dan."
Hmm. The last politician I recall with a plastics-related nickname was Ronald Reagan, once known as the Teflon President.
The Financial Times is reporting today that Dow Chemical Co. is looking for a buyer for its polypropylene licensing and catalyst business.
The FT's story cites all unnamed sources, but it has enough detail to sound convincing.
According to Marlene Givant Star's report, Midland, Mich.-based Dow has hired Citi to sell the business, which it estimates generated $1 billion in sales and $50 million in profit.
Sources expect that a strategic buyer will be interested in Dow's metallocene PE technology.
The impact of Japan's March 11 earthquake on the automotive supply chain has been well documented. How about other sectors? (Watch both Plastics News and www.autonews.com for updates).
Electronics is an obvious one. The Wall Street Journal has a story in its Asia Technology section today, "Chemical Reaction: iPod Is Short Key Material." According to the report, the shutdown of a Kureha Corp. polyvinylidene fluoride plant in Japan has created a shortage of lithium-ion batteries for Apple Inc.'s iPods.
Have you heard of other supply chain problems that have been a result of the earthquake and tsunami? Share them with me, we'll check them out.
I've noticed some manufacturing experts talking about what lessons OEMs will learn from this disaster. I don't think this is a new lesson -- remember how OEMs reacted in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2008? But it does reinforce the value of shorter supply chains, and multiple vendors, at least when it comes to critical, non-commodity products.
What's new in biobased polymers? How about high-strength plastics made from bananas and pineapples? I'm getting hungry just thinking about it.
I'm seeing headlines from all over the world today about an announcement from scientists in Brazil who are developing "super-strong automotive plastics" that may be commerialized in as little as two years.
"The properties of these plastics are incredible," project leader Alcides Leão of Sao Paulo State University said in a news release.
"They are light, but very strong -- 30 percent lighter and three to four times stronger. We believe that a lot of car parts, including dashboards, bumpers, side panels, will be made of nano-sized fruit fibers in the future. For one thing, they will help reduce the weight of cars and that will improve fuel economy."
Leão revealed the materials at the National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society in Anaheim, Calif.
I'd argue that Joseph, thanks to his quotablility, and the attention that he attracts with his cleverly named Save the Plastic Bag Coalition, may currently be the highest-profile advocate for the plastics industry in the world.
By the way, the reader comments section attached to the WSJ's story is active, and worth reading.
The plastics industry will generate some international news headlines in the next couple of days, following its "Global Declaration for Solutions on Marine Litter," announced March 22 in Honolulu.
With SPI's participation, more U.S. plastics processors can feel like they're now taking part in the debate.
"SPI and its member companies continue to embrace the concept of sustainability, and I am proud that we have joined with our peer organizations across the globe to make this formal declaration concerning marine debris," SPI President and CEO Bill Carteaux said in a news release. "The plastics industry has always been about creating innovations that meets societal needs. Marine litter is no exception and SPI stands ready to participate with others in problem-solving this issue."
Will the declaration make a difference in this issue, which until now has been driven largely by grass-roots environmental groups pushing for taxes and bans on products like plastic bags and polystyrene foodservice products?
Sarah Abramson Sikich, coastal resources director for Heal The Bay in Santa Monica, Calif., told Mike that it will not.
"Strong regulatory and policy action is needed that prevents trash from getting into waterways in the first place, as well as to promote the use of more sustainable items, like reusable bags and water bottles," she said. "We recommend target trash reductions, bans or charges on the most prevalent items found in aquatic environments be established to truly address the plastic pollution problem."
The Boston Globe had a nice story on Sunday about a trend in the housewares sector that we've been following, the rise of recycled-content products. The story went into some detail on housewares brand Preserve Products.
Plastics News staff reporter Rhoda Miel touched on this a few weeks ago, when recycled resins specialist NextLife LLC announced at the International Housewares Show that it had signed a partnership to supply post-consumer polypropylene to Recycline Inc., the Waltham, Mass., company that developed Preserve.
NextLife, based in Boca Raton, Fla., has worked with other companies to source recycled resins for their products. Its resins include proprietary post-consumer recycled PP and polystyrene that meet U.S. food safety requirements.
For Preserve, NextLife will provide PP for a range of items including toothbrushes, dishes and food storage products.
The Globe's story goes into some more detail on Preserve's plans, including naming the company's custom molder -- G&F Industries Inc.
G&F Industries Inc. of Sturbridge makes the Mini, along with other Preserve products, including colanders and reusable drinking cups. The two companies began working together in 2007. G&F president John J. Argitis says Preserve is still his only customer using 100 percent recycled plastic in its products. "From my perspective, I think it's pretty rare in the industry,'' he says.
While the relationship started small, today Preserve is a major customer of the 100-person plastic molding company. Once the Mini has been produced, G&F applies several labels (like "BPA Free'' and a bar code), puts a dozen of them into a cardboard box, and sends the boxes off to a distribution center in upstate New York. (Preserve uses software to analyze the environmental impact of nearly every decision it makes, such as whether to use trucks or trains to transport materials and products. The finished Minis are trucked; plastic the company reuses travels by rail.)
Check out the March 21 issue if Plastics News for our special report, "Plastics in Housewares," which includes a story on more products that are using recycled content.
And watch PlasticsNews.com tomorrow for Rhoda Miel's video reports from the show.
Columnist says plastic is 'too good to throw away'
After all the talk in recent weeks about avoiding plastics, The New York Times has a little different take on the topic today, with an op-ed column "Plastic: Too Good to Throw Away."
The column is written by Susan Freinkel described as the author of the forthcoming "Plastic: A Toxic Love Story."
While "Plastics Blog" readers may relate to the Times column's headline, the article itself isn't exactly a love letter to the industry. But it does have a message that some readers may consider positive -- that plastics have many worthwhile attributes.
"It's estimated that half of the nearly 600 billion pounds of plastics produced each year go into single-use products. Some are indisputably valuable, like disposable syringes, which have been a great ally in preventing the spread of infectious diseases like H.I.V., and even plastic water bottles, which, after disasters like the Japanese tsunami, are critical to saving lives," she writes.
"In a world of nearly seven billion souls and counting, we are not going to feed, clothe and house ourselves solely from wood, ore and stone; we need plastics. And in an era when we're concerned about our carbon footprint, we can appreciate that lightweight plastics take less energy to produce and transport than many other materials. Plastics also make possible green technology like solar panels and lighter cars and planes that burn less fuel. These "unnatural" synthetics, intelligently deployed, could turn out be nature's best ally."
But she takes plastics -- and, it seems, consumers -- to task for wasting this valuable resource on too many single-use throw-away products.
Disposables like bags, straws, packaging and lighters are "essentially prefab litter with a heavy environmental cost," she writes, adding that "...we can't hope to achieve plastic's promise for the 21st century if we stick with wasteful 20th-century habits of plastic production and consumption."
Freinkel seems to be echoing the opinions of some "Plastics Blog" readers who bridle at what they consider unfair attacks on plastics, while at the same time complaining that at least some of the industry's problems are the result of a culture that encourages overuse.
Look at this way: Crusades to outlaw water packaged in PET, or grocery bags made of polyethylene are shortsighted. Bottled water has definite attributes, as do PE bags. But just as shortsighted is our culture that encourages consumers to drink bottled water every day at home or on the job, when they have access to inexpensive and safe tap water, or to accept a PE bag with every single purchase at the grocery store, even when the product is small enough to carry out of the store -- or to put in your pocket.
I have a feeling that not all "Plastics Blog" readers will agree with Freinkel's column -- but also that she's not that far off from expressing the opinions of many in the plastics industry.
We see stories about plastics packaging and sustainability every day. But not on "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart."
Comedy Central's Stewart opened his March 7 show with a rant against Del Monte Fresh Produce Inc.'s individually wrapped bananas.
He nominated the product for the show's honorary "Pantry of Shame," saying the product was designed "for people who love bananas but hate their biodegradability."
James Epstein-Reeves wrote a well researched item on the issue today for Forbes magazine's "The CSR Blog," which focuses on corporate social responsibility issues.
I won't repeat all of Epstein-Reeves' work here ... check the link for a good Q&A interview with Dionysios Christou, Del Monte Fresh Produce's vice president of marketing.
As the plastics packaging experts on "The Plastics Blog" already know, there's a purpose for the individually wrapped banana -- to extend the shelf life of the product.
Certainly not all bananas need Del Monte's "Controlled Ripening Technology" package. But, used properly, it can help reduce food waste.
In the aftermath of the terrible earthquake and tsunami that devastated parts of Japan last week, global plastics companies are starting to join the relief effort.
Today we received word that Barcelona, Spain-based TPU supplier Merquinsa and Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical Co. have made donations.
Merquinsa made its donation to the Red Cross, to assist in emergency relief and rescue operations.
"We are shocked and saddened with what happened. Our thoughts are with all the people of Japan going through this very difficult time", said Jose Luis Ayuso, Merquinsa's president and executive chairman, "People of Japan are giving us a lesson of courage and responsibility."
Dow Chemical will make a donation of up to $6 million in humanitarian aid, including $2 million to the City of Soma Community Rescue Fund; up to $3 million to the Soma region in Dow product, technology and financial resources for long-term rebuilding; plus the company has a plan under development to offer employees a matching grant opportunity of up to $1 million.
"Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of Japan, including our Dow family, communities and partners, who are coping with the aftermath of last week's devastating earthquake and tsunami," said Andrew Liveris, Dow chairman and CEO. "It's clear that the need for assistance is paramount in Japan, so we hope our contributions can help expedite emergency response and the country's efforts to rebuild."
The students received information and training aimed at helping them to reduce plastic pollution in their hometowns.
So you can expects the newly motivated troops to start to take action to get taxes and bans passed in many, many more communities in the coming months.
Plastics News also has a story related to the summit today, on a study showing the extent that ocean fish eat plastic debris.
Response to the column was strong, she wrote in her Green Living blog on March 9. One note that stood out, she said, was from Craig Blizzard, a polypropylene industry veteran now working as an industry consultant in West Chester, Pa.
He wrote:
First, if one wishes to reduce personal plastic consumption for solid waste reasons, immediately stop consuming things which overuse plastic packaging since not many humans actually consume plastics per se. Glaring examples include soft drinks/beer at the stadium in heavy polypropylene cups, fast food pre-packaged salads in glossy polystyrene plates and lids, windshield wipers in their annoying PVC sleeve packages and TV sets, etc. swathed in polystyrene and polyethylene foam.
Second, if one wishes to reduce personal plastic consumption for personal health reasons such as a fear of any detectable level of plastic additive migration, stop consuming things packed/conveyed in plastics altogether. Every plastic can be made to exfoliate its chemical additives under some set of (possibly extreme) laboratory conditions if that's what the researcher wants to demonstrate. Under normal usage of most things plastic, my scientific sense suggests that our breathing of the exhaust emissions from our >150 million vehicle fleet in North America is likely to be order-of-magnitude more damaging to individual health than any plastic additive migration and that one's use of plastics is relatively riskless.
Third, if one wishes to reduce personal plastic consumption for energy conservation reasons, better and easier to reduce personal auto travel by 5-10%. The energy conservation by that action would likely dwarf the total energy content of the amount of plastics even the "greenest" person could reasonably save by meticulously reducing his/her consumption. Plastics are not a "low hanging fruit" in energy conservation.
Its interesting that Bauers devoted an entire blog post to Blizzard's thoughtful response to her column. Perhaps there's an example here that others could follow.
There's no arguing that a substantial number of Americans want to tax or ban plastic bags. But is it a majority?
In El Paso, Texas, the answer is no. That's according to this story from the El Paso Times, on a scientific poll conducted on March 5-6. The poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, according to the story.
The poll, conducted by Reuel Group Inc.,, found that 48.1 percent of poll respondents did not want plastic bags banned, and another 20.2 percent said consumers should have a choice between paper or plastic.
Just under 30 percent supported a ban.
The city of El Paso is considering putting a 10-cent fee on plastic bags, with 2 cents going to the retailer and 8 cents to the city.
Surfriders' lawyer explains stance against plastics
Do you wonder why environmentalists think taxes and bans on plastics are a good thing?
I'm sure many readers of the Plastics Blog disagree, but here's a video with Angela Howe, legal manager with the Surfrider Foundation, explaining why the group sponsors its "Rise Above Plastics" campaign, and how it is working on getting more bans and taxes adopted in states and municipalities in 2011.
Plastic packaging manufacturers have some new competition jockeying for attention from consumers who value sustainability.
Ecologic Brands Inc. this week is rolling out a cardboard bottle for Seventh Generation laundry detergent. USA Todaywrote about the package yesterday.
Ecologic calls its packages pouches, but they look like bottles. They're made from recycled cardboard and newspaper, and when they're empty they can be torn up and recycled with newspapers. (That's assuming anyone out there is still buying newspapers and recycling them, right?)
The packages still have plastic caps -- so that they look like a regular laundry bottle, according to Ecologic CEO Julie Corbett. "If you change too much, you can end up scaring consumers from buying it," she told USA Today's Bruce Horovitz.
Remember the National Debt Clock in New York? The Uni-Bell PVC Pipe Association is taking a page out of that playbook to highlight the staggering cost of water main breaks.
According to the trade association, every day, 850 water main breaks occur in North America at an annual repair cost of over $3 billion.
To hammer home the incredible waste of water -- and money -- Uni-Bell has launched a new web site, www.watermainbreakclock.com, where you can track the cumulative price tag to taxpayers of the high costs associated with repairs, replacement and more.
"The costs are astounding, not just in repairs, but emergency equipment, depleted water supply, traffic disruptions, and lost work time," said Executive Director Bruce Hollands. "Equally astounding is the fact that some local governments and utilities continue to use the same outdated, costly pipe material that corrodes over a very short period of time."
Uni-Bell members have a stake in the issue, since they hope to replace aging steel and concrete water pipe with PVC pipe, which they say can last in excess of 110 years.
Surfers have been on the front lines on the battle against plastic marine debris. Here's a video about a surfer and shaper who's trying to make boards from recycled plastic.
I noticed the story today on Discovery Communications' Treehugger.com blog. It's the story of Kevin Cunningham in Providence, R.I., who created the Spirare Sustainable Surf Craft project -- bringing together a desire to do something about marine debris with his passion for making surfboards from sustainable materials.
He explains in the video that his materials include post-consumer polystyrene.
A week ago, I wrote about the critical need for help -- in the form of portable toilets -- following the 6.3-magnitude earthquake that struck Christchurch, New Zealand, on Feb. 22.
Although the earthquake is already starting to slip off U.S. news coverage, the situation remains critical -- and it will remain so for a long time. According to Wilkinson, the public sewage system in the impacted area of Christchurch may not be operable for more than a year.
To get a better feel for the urgency of the effort, check this story, "Christchurch earthquake: Battle of Port-a-loos in dusty suburbs," from the New Zealand Herald.
To help out, SPI is heading an industry-wide effort to produce and ship 4,000 portable toilets to New Zealand.
According to a follow-up letter this week from Carteaux, one portable toilet manufacturer has already offered to manufacture and ship 50 units at no cost.
Now SPI is appealing for $1.5 million in donations by the next week -- in cash donations and in-kind contributions of resin and colorant -- to help meet the 4,000-unit goal.
Apple Computer Inc. may be phasing out a lot of external plastics, with a design ethic focusing on glass and aluminum, but it is still using some resins.
In the hype of the iPad 2 release, there's this information on the product's new cover:
"The innovative new iPad 2 Smart Cover provides protection for the iPad screen while maintaining its thin and lightweight profile. Designed with a unique self-aligning magnetic hinge that makes it easy to attach and remove, the new iPad 2 Smart Cover automatically wakes iPad 2 when it's opened and puts it to sleep when it's closed, and has a soft microfiber lining to help keep the screen clean. The Smart Cover also folds into a stand for typing or viewing videos and is available in vibrant polyurethane for $39 or rich leather for $69 in a range of colors, including a (PRODUCT) RED one which helps support the Global Fund to fight HIV/AIDS in Africa."
In this video from cnet, Apple's Steve Jobs says the covers "come in polyurethane, which is used to make space suits [audience laughter] ... or leather."
Thanks to Rhoda Miel, who covers design for Plastics News, for contributing this item.
The "Plastic-Free February" project is over. The bloggers who participated all discovered that it's awfully difficult to avoid plastics -- a lot harder than any of them expected.
For a sample of their experiences, check out this week-by-week report compiled by a rotating team of bloggers from publisher Rodale Inc., which sponsored the project.
It's full of stories about the problems they had avoiding plastic packaging and other products, as well as a few of their personal victories when they discovered a hard-to-find product made of an alternative material.
A few of her examples: Shampoo bottles, condiment bottles, takeout containers, garbage bags, pens and computers.
She actually suggests going back to glass ketchup and mustard bottles. But what about all the extra energy it would take to make and transport glass bottles instead of plastic? Wouldn't that more than offset any supposed benefits of avoiding plastic?
Unrest in the Middle East and the chemical industry
If you're interested in how political unrest in the Middle East might impact the pricing and availability of petrochemicals, check out Alex Tullo's post in "The Chemical Notebook" blog.
In the Feb. 28 post, "The Middle East Revolts And Chemicals," Tullo writes that the countries that have seen the most serious challenges to their ruling regimes -- Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, Yemen and Bahrain -- "don't have very large petrochemical industries, at least not in the sense that they are major producers of olefins and derivatives."
The Middle Eastern countries that do have large petrochemical industries -- Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar -- haven't seen as much unrest.
"If these countries do see serious challenges to the regimes, then there could be a disruption in chemical operations," he writes.
But he adds somewhat ominously: "never underestimate the power of high oil prices to sabotage the economy. The last time oil prices climbed into the 90s was in the fourth quarter of 2007, when the recession began."
Jan Schroers, a Yale University materials scientist, is touting a breakthrough that can help metal compete with plastic -- the ability to blow mold metal.
The blow molding process has some technological advantages for economically making complex, hollow shapes. Until now, blow molding has been pretty much limited to thermoplastics, because of the unique properties (viscocity, flow strength, etc.) of the material.
Schroers, in an article in the journal Materials Today, explains the conditions necessary for blow molding some metals.
Fans know that some sports have adapted to changes in equipment -- golf and football are prime examples. How about bowling?
Zach Berman from The Star-Ledger in Newark, N.J., wrote last week about professional bowlers bringing up to eight balls to the US Open tournament in North Brunswick, N.J.
"In the last 20 years, bowling balls evolved from rubber to polyester to urethane to reactive resins, with current technology that can control the amount of chemical friction a ball creates on the lane" Berman wrote in his story, "Competitors deploy a dizzying array of bowling balls at U.S. Open."
He quotes John Petraglia, a former bowler who now works for ball maker Brunswick: "You need a different ball, a different layout, a different surface on the ball for every condition you bowl on, almost every game now. A typical bowler will go through 80 to 100 balls a year now. Relate the bowling ball to NASCAR tires."
Unlike golf, which has resisted some equipment-related changes in the name of tradition, bowling has pretty much embraced this evolution ... with one exception.
The Professional Bowlers Association still gives a nod to "traditional materials" in the Mark Roth Plastic Ball Championship, scheduled to run from March 2-6 in Cheektowaga, N.Y.
In this tournament, all the players must use identical "throwback" polyester balls, like the ones that PBA Hall of Famer Mark Roth used back in the 1970s.
"The concept behind the plastic ball tournament is to put a premium on knowledge of changing lane conditions, subtle adjustments in hand positions and delivery techniques, and other skills rather than relying on advanced bowling ball technology," according to the PBA.
I'm aware that advances in bowling ball technology have resulted in much higher scores on all levels -- but I'm afraid that I wouldn't know the difference between the proper way to throw a polyester ball and a polyurethane ball.
Ken Layne from political blog Wonkette.com blasted the U.S. House of Representatives today for its decision to stop using compostable foodservice products in its cafeteria, and go back to using PS.
The story doesn't make the common mistake of calling PS foam foodservice "Styrofoam," even though the headline does.
But Layne jumps right into the blog with a rant against "foamed polystyrene," which he calls "a miraculous invention that manages to be completely awful through every step of its near-eternal "life cycle" -- it is manufactured with petroleum that must be imported from Middle East dictatorships, toxic "styrene oligomers" migrate into the food it holds, it's highly flammable and produces black poisonous smoke, and most of the 25 billion polystyrene cups tossed every year will take more than half a millennium to degrade."
Layne writes that "people with brains" ban PS.
The comment section on the blog is already going bananas. My favorite (?) so far: "Polystyrene cups are the perfect metaphor for the Repubicans (sic): White, lightweight and bad for the environment."
So much for the spirit of cooperation in Washington these days.
A group called the Catholic Coalition on Climate Change is suggesting that families make a sacrifice for Lent this year that will help make the world more sustainable.
The plastics-related suggestion caught my eye -- to give up disposable plastic or paper bags and replace them with reusable cloth bags.
But according to this story from the Catholic News Service, plastics aren't being singled out. The target is consumption and lifestyle, with a goal to focus on "Christian simplicity." And the coalition also has some suggestions that specifically mention paper, too:
Use cloth shopping bags instead of paper or plastic to reduce the estimated 380 billion plastic bags distributed in the United States each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Replace incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs. The U.S. Department of Energy says that if each U.S. household replaced just one bulb, it would save enough energy to light 3 million homes for a year and prevent 9 billion pounds of greenhouse gas emissions each year.
Give up disposable paper products such as napkins and paper towels.
Use a refillable mug instead of disposable cups. One coffee drinker using disposable cups can generate 22 pounds of waste in a year.
Are you up for debunking some myths about plastics recycling?
Envision Plastics Industries LLC's "Save the Plastics" is rapidly becoming my favorite plastics-related blog. Today the site posted a nice item that analyzes and comments on a well-traveled article from the Ecology Center in Berkeley, Calif., titled "Seven Misconceptions About Plastic and Plastic Recycling."
The folks at Envision Plastics, a major recycler of plastic packaging, is in a good position to comment on the "Misconceptions" article -- after all, they've got first-hand experience.
The blog notes that, despite the global audience that "Misconceptions" has enjoyed, the content of the article is actually more locally driven, "and not particularly accurate across a broader cross section of the country, or even California for that matter."
Here are a few of the seven "Misconceptions," along with Envision's take on the issues:
Misconception #1: "Plastics that go into a curbside recycling bin get recycled. Not necessarily.", says the Ecology Center. This statement is not accurate. Provided that we put the proper plastics in our recycling bins, as requested by our municipal waste authority, they will all be recycled. In Berkeley, they ask for #1 PET bottles and #2 HDPE bottles only. These plastics are in high demand and will be recycled back into plastics products.
The Ecology Center states that "In fact, none of the recovered plastic containers from Berkeley are being made into containers again...". This is not an accurate statement. We buy the #2 HDPE material from Berkeley (and many other California communities) and most of it is converted back into plastic bottles by Graham Packaging, Liquid Container, Consolidated Container, Clorox, Polytainer, Microdyne and other molders on the West coast. It is true that there are other end markets for this material and some of it may become plastic drainage pipe, plastic lumber or other products, but it certainly does not wind up in landfills.
Misconception #2: "Curbside collection will reduce the amount of plastic landfilled. Not necessarily.", says the Ecology Center. This doesn't make sense to us. Our plant in Chino, California saved 344,626,607 plastic bottles from being landfilled in 2010 alone and we are not the only recycler on the West coast.
The Ecology Center argues that more recycling will lead to more demand for plastics products. This is not how demand for consumer products is created; however, demand for recycled plastics currently exceeds supply of curbside collected plastics, so our attitude is, bring it on! We'll recycle it!
Envision doesn't just debunk the Berkeley article. They agree on some points, such as the meaning of the chasing arrows recycling symbol, and on the value of source reduction.
Check out the link for more "Save the Plastics" posts ... and keep up the good work, Envision.
The plastics industry is being called on to help out in the wake of the 6.3 magnitude earthquake that hit New Zealand's South Island on Feb. 22. The priority right now -- locating portable toilets.
"Since the devastating earthquake, the public heath focus has been on clean drinking water -- but sanitation remains a huge obstacle during the recovery efforts," Carteaux wrote. "If you manufacture portable toilets and would have an inventory available to ship overseas, please contact me tonight."
Given the urgent nature of the request, we're sharing it with Plastics Blog readers right away, as well as those of you who follow Plastics News via Twitter and Facebook. Post a reply to the blog, or send an email to editorial@plasticsnews.com, and I'll forward it immediately to Bill Carteaux and SPI.
In the meantime, Plastics News and the Plastics Blog will look for other opportunities to alert readers to ways that they can help. If you have a suggestion that you'd like to share with others, post it in the blog comment section.
PP pricing headlines, from Plastics News to Pravda
Polypropylene resin prices have been in the global spotlight for a couple of months, and Plastics News deserves much of the credit. Have you been watching?
In early January senior reporter Frank Esposito reported that PP prices had gone up 3 cents per pound, and were poised for another double-digit jump. He followed up a week later with news of a 17-cent-per-pound increase. The story noted that some manufacturers were considering moving out of PP to alternative materials.
On Feb. 14, The Economisttook note, with an item (attributed to PN) on how fast-food chains were switching from PP to paper cups.
Pravda cites The Economist as its source ... sadly, Plastics News fails to get any credit. Such is the nature of journalism on the web these days. But we still get a kick out of how far and wide this story has spread.
After plastic carry-out bags are banned, the next target may be the produce bags that consumers use to protect and transport fruit, vegetables and bulk products from grocery stores to their homes, according to one anti-bag activist.
The news was revealed in this story from the Santa Cruz Weekly. The proposed ban isn't the point of the story -- it's primarily a feature on singer/songwriter Jackson Browne's well-documented stance against plastic bags and water bottles.
Here's a taste of Browne's thoughts on plastics:
"The world is literally filling up with things that are designed to be used once and which never go away," Browne told the Santa Cruz Weekly. "Plastic bags are blowing around the Sahara desert. Camels are dying of starvation with their guts full of plastic." Browne says personal friends of his who have surfed on every continent have reported plastic bags washed up on beaches in Antarctica.
Browne will be honored for his high-profile anti-plastics stand on Feb. 23, when the environmental group Save Our Shores gives him an Ocean Hero award.
(Feb. 23 has also been designated as Jackson Browne Day in Santa Cruz, "to honor the veteran singer's anti-plastic campaign," the story says).
Laura Kasa, executive director of Save Our Shores, told the newspaper that after single-use grocery bags are banned, produce bags may become the group's next target.
Remember Colorforms, the toy made of thin vinyl shapes that stick to semigloss surfaces for creative play? The original Colorforms set was launched in 1951, so this is the toy's 60th anniversary.
According toPlaythings magazine, Colorforms were "the product of an offbeat idea of art students Harry and Patricia Kislevitz, who wanted something to use as a creative outlet for their children when in the bathroom."
Check out these classic TV ads for Colorforms, which highlight that kids can play with the forms that "stick like magic" with no scissors or glue. I didn't remember all of the versions of the game that featured licensed characters.
You won't believe who's being accused of greenwashing
S.C. Johnson & Son Inc. has spent millions on becoming a model of sustainability -- everything from using renewable energy, changing the formulation of products like Saran wrap, and launching recycling efforts.
So I was quite surprised today to see this report from The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on a lawsuit accusing the consumer products company with greenwashing.
Specifically, the suit questions the Racine, Wis.-based company's use of a proprietary "Greenlist" logo on its products.
The complaint, which seeks class-action status, says the Greenlist seal is misleading, because S.C. Johnson itself is the party judging the products' environmental attributes.
The Journal Sentinel's Rick Romell reports that the company isn't backing down.
S.C. Johnson says Greenlist criteria was reviewed by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. It also won an award from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and it claims that complying with the Greenlist goals has helped the company eliminate nearly 48 million pounds of volatile organic compounds from its products in the last five years.
Given the company's commitment to sustainability, I think the lawyers have targeted the firm with this suit. Yes, S.C. Johnson has deep pockets, and it makes a attractive target because of the high profile it has taken on sustainability issues.
But S.C. Johnson has walked the walk, and it would be a mistake to think they'll throw money at this lawsuit to get it settled.
We're on Day 8 of our "Plastics-Free February" watch, and I can finally report that the effort has generated an acknowledgment of the benefits of plastics.
I almost feel guilty. Yesterday I posted an item complaining that no one involved in the project was even questioning whether trying to live without plastics was a worthy goal.
"The universal assumption is that plastics are something that consumers should avoid," I wrote. "But I haven't seen any serious thought about the pros and cons of different materials."
Today, Rodale Inc., the magazine publishing company that cooked up "Plastics-Free February," took up the gauntlet.
Emily Main, online editor for Rodale.com, wrote a guest item for Maria Rodale's blog on The Huffington Post, headlined "Is Plastic Really That Bad?"
Regular Huffington Post readers may be surprised (the site often includes contributions that slam plastics over chemical safety issues), but Main took a careful look and concluded that plastics actually have benefits -- even plastics packaging!
Main wrote that after a visit to the grocery store on Sunday, she realized that it was very difficult to avoid buying anything that wasn't wrapped in plastic.
That got me thinking. Is plastic really that bad of a material? There must be some reason it's become the packaging material of choice for everything from crackers to contact lens solution. And, as it turns out, there is. Back in 1969, Coca Cola commissioned the very first life cycle analysis on packaging materials to determine whether the company should stick with its returnable glass bottles, switch over primarily to aluminum cans, or go with plastic bottles. The plastic bottles won out because, the analysis found, they used the least amount of oil and natural gas of the three alternatives. Glass is too heavy and requires more trucks to ship, and aluminum is extremely energy-intensive to manufacture.
Main goes on to cite other examples where plastic is superior to alternative packaging -- or to no packaging at all. She cites a study by Food Review stating that in countries where food packaging is minimal or nonexistent, food waste is as high as 50 percent.
Main doesn't ignore issues related to plastics packaging, including the still-in-the-spotlight chemical safety and marine debris problems. In the end, she concludes that plastics have benefits, but some products are grossly overpackaged.
I think most Plastics Blog readers will agree with that conclusion.
We're a week into "Plastics-Free February," and as expected the project is generating some attention -- including from some Plastics Blog readers, who are pointing out some chinks in the effort.
As a reminder, the project is sponsored by Rodale Inc., the publisher of magazines including Runner's World, Men's Health and Prevention.
Rodale's staffers are taking a stab at minimizing their use of plastics this month -- primarily in single-use disposables, packaging and food preparation/storage. They've also recruited a significant number of bloggers to participate. The rules are:
1. No buying or acquiring new plastic.
2. No cooking with plastic or storing food in plastic.
First, no one is questioning whether trying to live without plastics is a worthy goal. The universal assumption is that plastics are something that consumers should avoid. There are plenty of stories about bloggers substituting a product made of paper or some other material for plastic. But I haven't seen any serious thought about the pros and cons of different materials.
Second, they're discovering that living without plastic these days is just about impossible. Even minimizing it is very inconvenient. Bloggers are finding that they can find food without plastic packaging. But that often means lifestyle changes -- like buying different products or shopping at specialty stores.
And that doesn't even scratch the surface. Packaging and single-use disposables are the main target of "Plastics-Free February," but really living up to all the goals -- including no buying or acquiring new plastic and minimizing all other plastic use -- requires lifestyle changes that few are willing or able to accept.
Some Plastics Blog readers pointed out that readers of Rodale's magazines would have a tough time even making adjustments to their hobbies and leisure activities.
"I'd just love to see the subscribers to Runners World attempt to do their aerobic thing sans plastics," one wrote. "I was in a running shoe store on Saturday and there were polyesters, polypropylenes, polyethylenes, polyurethanes, polyamides and poly- this that and everything else on display throughout the store!"
Another pointed out that the latest Men's Health magazine has an article about the best way to cook a steak -- which includes putting the meat in a Ziploc bag and cooking it slowly in hot water first.
"I bet that [article] gets more readers than their blog does," the reader wrote to me.
I agree, the average Men's Health reader probably is more interested in cooking a delicious steak than in finding an alternative to his plastic toothbrush.
I'll keep watching the "Plastics-Free February" blogs for more insight, and I encourage more feedback from readers.
He wrote that the boy "is without a doubt being indoctrinated at the earliest possible age to hate all things that flow from the petrochemical industry. Could there be a more enlightened approach to rescuing the planet from Big Oil than to scare the living daylights out of the children?
"Memo to environmental fundamentalists: Please keep your sticky fingers off our children. We want them to learn how to think for themselves. We don't want them to be indoctrinated with fear and loathing of whichever people or objects you wish to dismiss or denounce."
Plastics proponents often say that educating young people is a key to the industry's future. But what message are children getting about plastics?
Up for an adventure that sounds just a bit nutty? Yesterday a raft made of polyethylene pipe left the Canary Islands on a 70-day (scheduled) sailing trip to the Bahamas.
One sailing publication describes the crew as "four elderly gentleman (one of them a fit, fighting 84)."
The raft, dubbed the An-Tiki, is made of PE pipe (some designed for potable water, some for natural gas transmission). That's appropriate, because the trip is aimed at raising awareness of the importance of clean water to the world's population. The trip is raising funds for a charity called Water Aid.
A pipe extrusion firm is even involved in the project. GPS PE Pipe Systems, a unit of Brussels-based Aliaxis SA, is a sponsor -- it donate the PE pipe used to make the vessel.
Looks like it's time for more bloggers to try to live "plastics free." Magazine publishing company Rodale Inc. has declared this "Plastics-Free February," and they have eight bloggers preparing to write about the effort.
The publisher is pushing readers to drop plastics for personal health benefits. That's in keeping with Rodale's overall tone -- its titles include Runner's World, Men's Health and Prevention magazines.
As usual, "plastics free" doesn't really mean plastics free. No one is talking about doing without electricity, computers, plumbing, transportation or medical care. The aim is primarily at single-use plastic and packaging.
Rodale's "Plastics-Free February" rules are:
1. No buying or acquiring new plastic.
2. No cooking with plastic or storing food in plastic.
3: Minimize all other plastic use.
I'll keep an eye on the bloggers' progress for any interesting reports.
Jon Huntsman Jr. appears to be edging closer to a run at the Republican nomination for president. Soon the question will shift from "will he run?" to "can he win?"
Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns of Politico.com have a story today about Huntsman's supporters forming a political action committee to help him hit the ground running, should he decide to throw his hat into the ring.
Of course Huntsman has a job right now -- U.S. Ambassador to China -- and the current occupant at the White House might not be thrilled to have one of his "employees" taking part in an active effort to take his job. But according to Politco, so far the Obama administration has just joked about Huntsman's plans.
(Some political web sites today are reporting that Huntsman may be preparing to resign from the U.S. Ambassador's job).
Can Huntsman win the nomination? Maybe not -- and the problem isn't his plastics industry background. His weakness might be that he's viewed by Republican primary and caucus voters as being too moderate -- although that could be strength in the general election, if Huntsman manages to win the nomination.
Politico points out that Huntsman won "exactly zero votes" in a recent presidential straw poll taken in New Hampshire
Bottled water sales suffered during the Great Recession, and some pundits predicted it would never come back -- the victim of thriftiness and environmentally enlightened consumers.
But perhaps they wrote the epitaph a bit too soon.
Convenience Store News reported yesterday that bottled water sales were up 4.2 percent in 2010, and are likely to grow another 3 percent in 2011.
Where's all the growth coming from? If you think it's all the fancy lemon- and berry-flavored waters that you've noticed in your local grocery, guess what -- you're wrong.
According to the experts quoted by Convenience Store News, the fastest growth is in sales of old-fashioned plain water.
Former Obama administration environmental adviser Van Jones will stir up the plastics industry with this speech recorded at the TedxGreatPacificGarbagePatch conference, held in Los Angeles in November.
His talk, "The economic injustice of plastic," links the ideas of social justice and the environment.
In his view, having an economy where throwaway plastic products are available leads to a society that also considers poor children "disposable."
Plastics have "horrific" impacts on the planet -- and also on people, Jones says.
Recycling makes consumers feel better about themselves, but he claims plastic isn't actually recycled -- it's burned, he says, in developing countries.
Some of this may seem ridiculous to an audience of plastics industry readers. But that does not mean it will be ignored.
Already, the Discovery Channel's Treehugger.com blog has linked to and posted the video.
Cast iron pipe suspected in Philadelphia explosion
A 71-year-old cast-iron gas main is suspected as a possible cause of a natural gas explosion on Jan. 18 that killed a utility worker and injured five people.
"There's always a concern about cast-iron pipe," Thomas Knudsen, chief executive of Philadelphia Gas Works, told The Wall Street Journal.
The story cites federal data for Philadelphia Gas Works indicating 18 incidents from 1985-2008 involving cast-iron pipes "that resulted in death, injury or significant property damage."
The utility, like others around the country, has been investing in recent years to replace old cast iron with new polyethylene pipe.
The Ecological Plastic is produced using less petroleum for manufacturing and additionally will limit the vehicles overall carbon emission. This development will contribute to Toyota's overall goal of going green and not hurting the environment.
It's interesting that this dealer finds it worthy enough to put out a news release on the material. One of my colleagues at Automotive News noticed it today, and I imagine some sustainability-minded car buyers will stumble across it online as well.
Thailand's Indorama Ventures has ambitious plans to be a top global player in PET resin -- that's been documented. So I was glad to see The Wall Street Journal post a Q&A interview today with company CEO Aloke Lohia.
In 1988 he moved to Thailand to set up a chemical business. He got into PET resin in 1995, and two years later he benefited when Thailand devalued its currency, the baht. That was a big plus for Indorama because most of the company's earnings were in U.S. dollars.
In the interview, Lohia highlights opportunities for growth in emerging markets:
China, India, other parts of Asia, some parts of east Europe, former [Commonwealth of Independent States] countries, Brazil, Mexico. So the lesser-developed countries, that's where the growth is and that's where our focus of growth is.
He also specifically mentioned Brazil, in the context of interest in using ethanol as a feedstock for PET, instead of petroleum.
"At the moment, all our free stock is petroleum-based. We are looking at the ethanol side of Brazil, and ethanol can be converted into plastic. So we are looking if we can have a good tie-up on the ethanol side and then convert it into what they call a bioplastic which is much greener than a petrol-based [plastic]," Lohia said. "We would like to partner with somebody who has ethanol availability."
PlasticsNews.com posted my latest column today about plastics and marine debris, along with a great cartoon by Rich Williams.
The column concludes that the plastics industry "has an important role in preventing more plastic from fouling the oceans."
What's being done now? Steve Russell, vice president of plastics at the American Chemistry Council posted a blog item yesterday on the topic, "Tackling Marine Debris in 2011."
Russell writes about plastic makers' commitment to finding marine debris solutions, and ACC's involvement in an upcoming event, the 5th International Marine Debris Conference (5IMDC).
"5IMDC presents a tremendous opportunity to deepen our understanding, meet with researchers and other experts, talk about best practices, and find new ways to work together on real solutions," Russell writes.
"Some of the things we look forward to sharing include successes we've had with public-private partnerships in California. For example, for the past three years we have worked in California (including with Keep California Beautiful, California State Parks, Caltrans and the City of Woodland) to place nearly 700 recycle bins throughout the state. Those bins diverted over 45 tons of plastic and over 105 tons of other recyclable materials from the waste stream, and importantly, prevented them from entering the marine environment as litter."
Check out Russell's post for more details and links.
"It's all around us--so much a part of our lives that we forget it's there. But try to survive a single day without packaging. This episode reveals the astounding technology and ingenuity required to create our packaged world. At a Michigan company that designs water bottles, we'll show you how engineers find their inspiration from a bell pepper. In New Jersey, the makers of bubble wrap clue you in on their manufacturing secrets. In Texas, workers conquer the challenge of packaging the world's largest crane. And you'll also see how America's military goods and supplies are packaged and shipped by the United States Transportation Command. Other stories include a new easy to open package that's the cure for "wrap rage"-- and how NASA engineers packed a fragile humanoid robot for a trip into orbit."
Set your TiVo, this program sounds like it will be worth checking out. And thanks to blog reader Andrew Peacock for passing along this tip.
Get ready for more negative stories about plastics, as the documentary film "Plastic Planet" opens tomorrow in some U.S. markets.
Austrian director and author Werner Boote is behind the project -- this review from The Hollywood Reporter notes that Boote's grandfather was "an early plastics manufacturing executive [who] delivered lengthy lectures -- shades of The Graduate -- extolling [plastics'] virtues to his young grandson."
Boote wasn't convinced. From the trailer, it looks like the focus of the movie will be on some of the most controversial issues the plastics industry has faced in recent years: marine debris and litter, and chemical safety (University of Missouri professor Frederick vom Saal is on screen talking about bisphenol A and polycarbonate.)
More from the Hollywood Reporter's review:
The filmmaker takes a wide-ranging approach to his topic, traveling to many far-flung locations and interviewing scores of subjects ranging from plastics industry executives to experts in such fields as biology and genetics. Needless to say, none of the latter have anything very positive to say about the way plastics have come to permeate modern society.
Take a look, you might see someone you know. I think I recognize some exhibits from the 2007 K show in Dusseldorf.
Oregon State University Professor Angelicque White made global headlines this week with her report criticizing the media for grossly exaggerating the size of the "Great Garbage Patch."
Blogger Sylvia Rowley says plastic clearly poses a threat to wildlife, and suffers from its visibility in marine debris and litter.
"However, in some cases, plastic is environmentally the better option," she writes, because plastic, if recycled, has a better carbon footprint than materials like cardboard.
Nevertheless, she cites the example of a UK company, Riverford Organics, that tried to switch its packaging from cardboard to durable plastic boxes, only to face a backlash from its customers.
Founder Guy Watson told the Guardian that the company decided to stay with cardboard because of the perception that it was better. Riverford Organics did not want to risk losing customers who believed plastic was environmentally unfriendly.
"You have to be quite courageous to fly in the face of people's intuitive judgement," Watson said, "and some might say commercially foolhardy." (Now he's investigating using bamboo, instead.)
Manufacturers can't expect many customers to step up and make the case that plastics are the superior choice. Publicity about studies like White's at Oregon State may help.
But until the plastics industry makes progress on its recycling efforts, and its image problem, potential customers like Watson will have a tough time carrying that burden on their own.
The Sunday morning talk shows were buzzing yesterday with news that Jon Huntsman Jr. may be interested in the Republican nomination for the White House in 2012.
The discussion got its start from Newsweek magazine, which posted a lengthy feature, "The Manchurian Candidate," on Saturday.
Huntsman is currently U.S. Ambassador to China -- hence the "Manchurian candidate" reference. President Obama picked Huntsman for the slot, a move that political insiders said may have been aimed in part as removing a strong potential rival from the 2012 race.
But Huntsman isn't out of the picture. Newsweek asked if he would rule out a 2012 run, and Huntsman declined to comment. Here's what he did have to say about his presidential ambitions:
You know, I'm really focused on what we're doing in our current position. ... But we won't do this forever, and I think we may have one final run left in our bones.
As Steve Toloken, Plastics News' Asia bureau chief, wrote in 2009, Huntsman is a familiar face to the U.S. plastics industry. He's a member of the family that owns part of The Woodlands, Texas-based chemical and plastics supplier Huntsman Corp. He also served as a top executive at Huntsman Corp., where his brother Peter is CEO and his father Jon Sr. -- the company founder -- is chairman.
On the political side of his resume, Huntsman has been U.S. ambassador to Singapore, deputy U.S. trade representative responsible for Asia and governor of Utah.
Toloken caught up with Huntsman last year at a news conference in Shenzhen -- check this link for his story, plus a link to an audio clip of Huntsman responding to a question about a U.S. manufacturer that planned to withdraw its research and development work from Shenzhen over IP concerns.
Meanwhile, here's an update on a plastics executive who is, indeed, on his way to Washington. Larry Bivins, who covers Washington for the Appleton, Wis., Post-Crescent, wrote a feature on Ron Johnson, the new GOP senator from Wisconsin.
Johnson will be sworn in on Wednesday. The story points out that with Johnson going to Washington, his younger brother Barry will take over management of Pacur LLC, Johnson's Oshkosh, Wis.-based sheet extrusion company.
In the news business, the week between Christmas and New Year's is big on "Year-in-Review" stories, so here's ours: The Most Popular Stories from PlasticsNews.com in 2010.
My criteria -- the number of times that readers viewed any story posted on our web site during the calendar year.
We've posted several updates on this case during 2010, so if you're just catching up now make sure to check our story archives for more information.
No. 2: Dow Chemical sticks to Basics, a feature by senior reporter Frank Esposito from April. Frank outlined the Midland, Mich.-based company's strategy for its plastics operations since the 2008 collapse of a proposed commodity plastics joint venture with a Kuwaiti firm.
Again, this is a topic that we've come back to several times this year, so check the archives for the most recent updates.
I took a break from the game to write this story at 10:30 p.m. on Super Bowl Sunday, complete with a timely response from the American Chemistry Council's Plastics Division, and reaction from advertising/media critics including Advertising Age's Bob Garfield.
No. 4: Amcor to buy Ball's plastics packaging unit, by staff reporter Dan Hockensmith. Big M&A news, always a mainstay on PlasticsNews.com, and this story featured solid reaction from several analysts.
No. 5: Mexico's plastics industry taking action to crack down on resin theft. Our coverage of Mexico is strong thanks to local correspondent Steve Downer. Here he wrote about gangs of thieves who were stealing trucks loaded with resin, an estimated 1,000 metric tons of material every year.
No. 9: Industry reacts to US healthcare plan. Mike Verespej, PN's staff reporter in Washington, was in a prime position to report on what President Obama's healthcare plan would mean to the plastics industry. First, obviously, he's based in D.C. and covers all the relevant trade associations. Second, Mike covers the medical sector for Plastics News, so he had sources ready with their take on how "Obamacare" would impact their end market.
No. 10: Four processors named finalists for Plastics News annual award. Our Processor of the Year award is extremely popular, and this story from January 2010 announced the finalists. (The winner ended up being GW Plastics Inc., a Vermont-based processor that has transitioned into a medical molder.)
Watch our Web site around Jan. 10 for the release of this year's finalists.
Thanks to all our loyal readers, and best wishes to everyone for a healthy and prosperous 2011.
According to the story, the suit was brought by the Lincolnshire County Council against Sainsbury plc, which packages its Taste the Difference Slow Matured Ultimate Beef Roasting Joint in plastic wrap, atop a plastic tray, under a clear plastic cover surrounded by a cardboard sleeve.
Interesting, since Sainsbury has gotten quite a bit of publicity for its effort to reduce single-use plastic packaging, particularly with its reusable cotton "I am not a plastic bag" bags, which it sold for $10.
Packaging is one of those topics where everyone feels like an expert -- like the weather. So the topic seems to have struck a nerve, especially with the timing around Christmas, when so many consumers are struggling to un-pack things like toys and electronics.
Check the comments posted on Rosenthal's blog for a taste of what consumers think of the packages that some Plastics Blog readers have a hand in creating.
Todd Wynn, vice president of the libertarian Cascade Policy Institute, has a thoughtful column about plastic bag bans on OregonLive.com.
"Plastic Bags: It's time to get beyond 'ban, ban, ban,'" argues that plastic bags are not the environmental nightmare that some environmentalists make them out to be. Litter and marine debris problems are not the result of plastic bags existing -- they are the result of bags not ending up in the proper place -- landfills, trash cans and recycling bins, Wynn says.
The problem is littering, yet the only solution proposed is an outright ban.
The argument doesn't make much sense anyhow. Plastic doesn't just exist in bags. It is in a whole host of products that the world consumes. What's next? Banning all plastic on Earth?
It is unfortunate that supposedly well-intentioned advocacy organizations put all their efforts into outright consumer bans. These organizations could work towards creating public awareness of a perceived problem and organizing a grassroots movement to use alternatives voluntarily.
The only way to effect meaningful change is to change culture, which requires voluntarily winning hearts and minds.
The column doesn't have any reader comments yet, but I imagine that will change soon. The bag ban issue is heating up in Oregon. I'll be checking back on this debate.
Single-use plastics are the subject of a pretty entertaining song parody set to the tune of "Empire State of Mind."
The song, "Plastic State of Mind," starts with the typical grocery store scene -- a shopper buying a few staples is asked if he wants paper or plastic.
Suddenly, the entire scene becomes a music video, with rapper/activist AshEL Eldridge and singer Jenni Perez taking the parts made famous by Jay-Z and Alecia Keys in "Empire State of Mind."
The video does go too far by implying that plastic bags are toxic. That term is thrown around so much that it's starting to lose its meaning.
Still, the video is catchy and entertaining. It does a good job of reinforcing the message that consumers should use durable reusable grocery bags (I have a half dozen sitting at home, but, like the hapless grocery customer in the video, I rarely remember to bring them to the store.)
Music and video is continuing to move to all-digital formats, and that's hurting companies that specialize in "old-fashioned" formats like CDs and DVDs.
The Wilkes-Barre, Pa., CitizensVoice.com had a story on Dec. 19 about the Cinram International Inc. plant in Olyphant, Pa., that continues to shed jobs as consumer tastes change. "Cinram workers ready for goodbye" explains how the workforce there -- which once numbered in the thousands -- now is down to 500.
The job losses were expected -- Toronto-based Cinram in February lost its biggest contract, with Warner Home Video Inc. which had accounted for about 28 percent of Cinram's US$1.5 billion in 2009 sales.
But even with the loss of the Warner Home Video work, companies that manufacture plastic media for the entertainment industry are losing business -- to the convenience of digital downloads.
According to the most recent statistics from the Recording Industry Association of America, a total of 1.13 billion music singles were downloaded in 2009. That compares to 292.9 million CDs. (As recently as 1996, there were 778.9 million CDs sold, according to RIAA).
Every few weeks I notice a newspaper feature on the "rebirth" of music on vinyl, but that's really a niche market. Vinyl LP/EP sales rose to 3.2 million units in 2009, up from 2.9 million in 2008. But the 1996 total was also 2.9 million units.
Some music fans may lament the digital download trend. But it's really a sustainability story -- this is an industry that's done away packaging, solid waste, energy consumption and material use.
If you buy a Barbie doll for a Christmas present, how many trees should you plant to offset the carbon footprint?
TinyGreenBubble.com reported today on Barbie's carbon footprint, thanks to research from the California College of the Arts Design Strategy program.
The post doesn't answer the tree question, unfortunately. But it does include a bit of detail about Barbie's chemical makeup (she's got a PVC head, nylon hair,an ABS body and a thermoplastic elastomer waist).
It also notes that every Barbie consumes 3.2 cups of oil -- or 1.127 watts of energy.
TinyGreenBubble isn't a fan of Barbie (or plastics, it seems).
In the past couple of days I've received word of a couple of new plastics-focused blogs, plus I received results from a big resin company's experiment with social media.
The new blogs first.
Lavergne Group, a company with a well known project to recycle ink cartridges for HP, has unveiled a blog focused on recycling-related issues and the company's capabilities. Lavergne added the blog in a recent redesign of its web site. The company also added a Facebook profile, and it plans to add Twitter and YouTube sites in the near future.
AMAMCO Tool, a Duncan, S.C., custom tooling provider, has also made the leap into blogland with CustomCarbideTools.Com, a web log devoted to information about efficient machining of carbon fiber composite parts.
It's interesting to see more companies dipping their toes into social media. The biggest plastics-related move into this area in 2010 had to be Dow Chemical Co.'s ambitious effort at K 2010, the "Stronger, Together" project.
Midland, Mich.-based Dow built a portal for its efforts at www.dowstrongertogether.com that linked its Twitter, Facebook and YouTube pages. The company updated the sites frequently before and during K 2010 -- I'm sure that was a key to the successful effort -- and it also did quite a bit of promotion of the project.
At the show, the company even had a staffer doing daily video reports from Dusseldorf.
How did it all work? Simon Dibb, who was involved with the project at marketing-PR firm Porter Novelli, said Dow was "pleasantly surprised" by the post-K metrics, and it is now evaluating the various channels to determine how to continue to use them to serve the online community it has built.
Key metrics to date include:
6,300 YouTube views of K-specific Dow videos, some featuring Dow managers expressing what Stronger, together means to them, plus the daily news updates (daily news videos accounted for 3,850 of the total video views).
1,771 page views on Dow's social media web portal www.dowstrongertogether.com
146 Dow at K 2010 Facebook fans, with 75 comments/likes generated in 4 weeks
129 Dow at K 2010 Twitter followers (including 20+ trade media)
Not huge numbers, to be sure, but Dow felt it had an opportunity to be a first-mover in social media compared to its rival resin suppliers.
Andrew Liveris of Dow Chemical Co. is the most influential person in the global chemical industry. That's according to ICIS Chemical Business magazine, which has compiled a Top 40 Power Players for 2010 list.
Plastics have a lot to do with Liveris winning the top spot. The story (PDF) notes that Dow has adjusted its strategy, and now plans to sell some commodity plastics operations in the next couple of years -- perhaps HDPE and PP -- and keep its LDPE and LLDPE assets.
The No. 2 "Power Player" is Peter Bahnsuk Kim, CEO of LG Chem. An ICIS news release notes that South Korea-based LG Chem "is making big strides in the battery and electronics markets, and also capitalizing on the growth in demand for plastics in China."
Mohamed Al-Mady, CEO of Saudi Basic Industries Corp, is the No. 3 player.
The majority of executives on the "Power Player" list have plastics-specific ties. Rounding out the top 10, they include: Yoshimitsu Kobayashi of Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings at No. 4; Kurt Bock of BASF on No. 5, James Gallogly of LyondellBasell Industries at No. 6, Mukesh Ambani of Reliance Industries at No. 7, Jim Ratcliffe of Inneos at No. 8, Abdullah bin Al-Attiyah of Qatar Petroleum at No. 9 and Stephen Pryor of ExxonMobil Chemical at No. 10.
Plastic bag ban proposals continue to pop up anywhere and everywhere. This week the city of Long Beach, Calif., took a step toward adoping a ban, while a proposal surfaced 1,700 miles away in Arkansas.
The Long Beach City Council on Dec. 7 voted 6-2 to instruct the city attorney to draft an ordinance that would ban plastic bags. Local news reports say the proposal will be similar to a ban recently adopted by Los Angeles County.
The Long Beach Press-Telegramis reporting that the ordinance would ban plastic bags beginning Aug. 1 at large stores, and at smaller stores starting Jan. 1, 2012.
The City Council is scheduled to vote on the proposal early next year.
Of course if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has his way and the state of California passes a ban, the debate could be moot. But he's a lame duck, so it may be unlikely that he'll get a ban passed before Gov. Jerry Brown takes over.
Meanwhile in Arkansas, Republican state Sen. Denny Altes filed "The Reusable Shopping Bag Act" this week. It would require large stores in the state to provide only paper bags and to sell reusable cloth bags.
President and CEO Richard Schloesser noted that Toray's relationship with the university began more than 20 years ago. The company provides nearly four dozen scholarships each year to the best undergraduate engineering students at URI, as well as internships at the company's plant in North Kingstown, R.I.
"Toray is committed to promoting excellence in higher education and to building strong partnerships within our community that enhance the lives of the people who live here and help foster innovation," Schloesser said in a news release. The company is a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Toray Industries Inc.
Toray's donation was part of the University's "Making a Difference" capital campaign and directed to an initiative that specifically provides funding opportunities to prospective graduate students in engineering.
The College of Engineering's Dean Ray Wright added: "Toray is a highly-valued partner of the College of Engineering, and we are grateful for its long-standing support on so many fronts."
German designer Konstantine Grcic, who made the pages of Plastics News a few years ago for his work on the Myto cantilever chair made of plastic, was named designer of the year at DesignMiami this week.
The New York Times posted a Q&A interview with Grcic this week, noting that the honor was a surprise -- most previous winners were artists, while he is "known for his rigorous focus on logic, utility and simplicity."
PN readers may recall that Grcic worked with BASF AG on the Myto chair, which featured a then-new high-speed version of its Ultradur polybutylene terephthalate resin. For background on that project, check out staff reporter Rhoda Miel's story.
With Haiti suffering through a recent cholera outbreak, some companies with plastics ties are working to help out by empowering Haitians to properly treat their drinking water.
Deep Springs International, a Grove City, Pa.-based non-profit organization, was on the ground in Haiti for three years before the earthquake hit, helping to improve the health of the population by distributing safe water storage containers and liquid chlorine solution.
As the cholera epidemic continues to spread, DSI has responded by providing chlorine solution for the water distribution network in St. Marc and 353 schools in the Artibonite region - the epicenter of the outbreak - as well as 16 other communities where DSI previously had established programs.
DSI's corporate partners secured funds for the distribution of 900 additional gallons of liquid chlorine solution and 500,000 solid chlorine tablets. The partners include Lanxess Corp., Nova Chemicals and PPG Industries.
Following the January earthquake, Lanxess allowed Jeff Ritter, who works in the company's procurement department, to dedicate all his time to the relief effort. Since then,
Lanxess has donated about $250,000 to help fund DSI's project, providing over 20,000 household water purification systems as well as tablets and other supplies that produced 20 million gallons of safe water for the relief effort.
Nova Chemicals donated two containers of high density polyethylene, which will allow DSI to manufacture nearly 30,000 water purification systems in Haiti. Nova, through its Inspirion Ventures subsidiary, also is donating four collapsible containers store the systems in remote areas.
PPG Industries provided more than 2,750 pounds of Accu-Tab tablets to treat water supplies.
To date, DSI has helped more than 450,000 individuals and 50,000 children under the age of five to benefit from clean drinking water. To date, according to the company, the project saved the lives of more than 100 children, who otherwise would have died of diarrheal-related dehydration. For more information, visit www.deepspringsinternational.org.
Fiji Water Co. LLC has reopened it bottling plant on Fiji's main island of Viti Levu, after temporarily shutting it down to protest a new 15-cent-per-liter tax on bottled water.
The company posted a brief statement about the decision on its blog:
Following discussions today with Fijian officials, Fiji Water will reopen its bottling plant, effective Wednesday morning, Dec. 1, at its regular start-up time of 8 a.m. Through our discussions, we have also agreed to comply with Fiji's new water tax law.
Moving forward, FIJI Water is committed to working with the Fijian government, and remains dedicated to helping the country's economy and its people.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today called on the state Legislature to pass a ban on plastic bags, possibly as early as December.
A bill that would have banned single-use plastic bags failed in the state Senate this summer. But Schwarzenegger said the state needs to reconsider in order to "terminate" plastic pollution.
"Of course we fell short a few votes, but we said, 'We'll be back,' and we are back again. And maybe in December we can do it. Who knows. And if we don't get it done in December, we'll get it done next year. We're going to try over and over again. Because we have seen in the past that when you don't give up, eventually you can be successful."
Check out the video below. Among other things, he criticizes the American Chemistry Council, saying that outside forces can say a ban would be too costly, but that does not take into account the costs that plastic bags create for shoppers, for local communities and for wildlife.
Fiji Water Co. LLC, a company that's long faced the ire of some environmentalists, might be looking for a new aquifer.
President and Chief Operating Officer John Cochran announced Nov. 28 that the Los Angeles-based company would shut down its factory in Fiji today, after the government there announced that it would impose a 15-cent-per-liter tax on water bottled at locations where more than 3.5 million liters per month are extracted.
Fiji Water, which currently pays 1/3 of a cent per liter, is the only bottled water producer in Fiji affected by the tax.
Cochran added:
As a leading exporter, Fiji Water has contributed greatly to the Fijian economy. We represent more than F$130 million in export revenue for the country and employ nearly 400 Fijians at our facility. Our investment in Fiji has created millions of dollars in value through direct employment and with our supplier network. We currently pay millions of dollars in duties and income tax to the government. We also contribute over F$1.8 million dollars annually in royalty payments to the Yaqara Pastoral Co. Ltd. and another F$250,000 annually to a trust that supports the six local villages surrounding our facility.
In addition, our company and the Fiji Water Foundation have worked tirelessly to help improve the quality of life for the Fijian people, including an annual investment of F$1 million to bring clean water to local villages, improve education, and provide access to health care services for those in need.
We consider the government's current action as a taking of our business, and one that sends a clear and unmistakable message to businesses operating in Fiji or looking to invest there: The country is increasingly unstable, and is becoming a very risky place in which to invest.
Fiji Water remains willing to work through this issue with the Fiji government, as it would be our preference to keep operating in Fiji.
Stewart and Lynda Resnick, owners of Fiji Waters, already own the Spring Fresh brand of bottled water in New Zealand, and "Spring Fresh's website now uses many of the same selling points as Fiji Water, including a claim that the company's operations are 'carbon negative,'" according to Mother Jones.
Plastics and fashion came together in a cool and unexpected way last night, when rapper/songwriter/producer will.i.am wore a hat made from Lego blocks to the 2010 American Music Awards in Los Angeles.
I was hoping to post a video, but haven't found a good one yet that I can share. But here are some nice photos. This one shows the hat's brim, and this one gives you the ability to zoom in on the blocks by putting your cursor over the hat.
Finally, here's a video from CNN, with an interview where wil.i.am is wearing the hat.
It's a nice, colorful and creative departure from the usual bling.
Chicago's McCormick Place picked up some good news today: Solar Power International announced that Chicago will be home to its 2013 conference, the largest of its kind in North America.
According to the Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau, the event will bring 27,000 attendees and generate at least $38 million in spending, according to this report from Crain's Chicago Business.
Plastics Blog readers will recall that it was a year ago this week -- Nov. 17, 2009 -- that the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. announced it was moving the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows to Orlando, Fla.
Injection moulding machines across the world are poised for a plastic souvenir bonanza, following yesterday's announcement of the Royal Wedding.
Amongst the acres of coverage about the design of the engagement ring and the wedding dress, and how they will inspire all of next year's brides to buy the same, there is so far little coverage of the containers full of plastic knick-knacks which will be heading for the impressionable markets of Europe and the US.
Britain's Guardian does have a story about the global rush to make souvenir mugs, plates, paperweights and other "collectables" to commemorate the wedding.
(If you haven't heard about the upcoming wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton -- please don't look to Plastics News for additional coverage.)
Also from the blogosphere today, Alex Tullo in The Chemical Notebook has a fun post wrapping up his coverage from Dow Chemical Co.'s recent investor day.
Dow CEO Andrew N. Liveris is not without his talents. CEOs of chemical companies often bring unique skills to their jobs. Jon M. Huntsman, for instance, is one of the industry's best negotiators. Liveris is at his best when he is moving his lips. He is a salesman of first rank. When you ask him a tough question, he acts as if he woke up that morning hoping someone would ask him that.
Even Andrew Liveris can be stumped. A reporter from Michigan Public Radio asked him about hypocrisy of investing in solar cells and lithium batteries in the U.S. while pursuing coal-to-chemicals in China. Liveris wobbled to his feet muttering things about best practices, Responsible Care, and planting lots of elm trees.
Check out the link for the rest of Alex's thoughts and observations.
The plastics industry's recycling record is the main focus of a multi-part report from the Canadian Broadcasting Corp.'s CBC News in Winnipeg, Manitoba, titled "The Predicament of Plastics."
Not a lot new here -- they reveal that most plastic that residents in Winnipeg put in their blue bins heads to China, where processors make durable goods like Barbie dolls and flyswatters.
The "story comments" sections for the report are filled with reader opinions -- both on the pro and con sides of the plastics industry's environmental record. According to the site, additional comments are welcome until 11:59 p.m. on Nov. 18.
Compostable, biodegradable polylactic-acid bags may be too noisy for U.S. snack food fans. But Frito-Lay has decided that Canadians are willing to put up with a loud bag in exchange for the environment.
Still think it's too loud? Then you can get a set of earplugs from the company!
Check out this advertisement from the company about the plan -- it's interesting they call it a "public service announcement."
And if you want more information about SunChips packaging and PLA, check out the upcoming Sustainable Plastics Packaging conference, scheduled for Dec. 8-9 in Atlanta.
JoAnn Hines, consultant and Packaging Diva, plans to speak on the topic: "When green goes wrong: What happened with the SunChips compostable packaging failure?"
Right now the group is asking students to come up with solutions to plastic waste problems in their towns. About 100 students will be selected to attend the summit, along with filmmakers, scientists, ocean researchers and "media experts" who will train the students to become expert on reducing plastic in their communities. Submissions are due by Nov. 30.
I spotted information about the summit thanks to Southern California Public Radio, which did an "Everyday Heroes" story about a local student and environmental activist who plans to attend the meeting.
Plastics industry spent $2 million on lobbying in California
The plastics industry spent about $2 million on lobbying in California between July 1 and Sept. 30 -- as the state legislature was considering a bill that would have banned many single-use plastic bags.
More than half of that total came from Hartsville, S.C.-based bag manufacturer Hilex Poly Co. LLC, according to a report from The Sacramento Bee, based on recently released data from the California Secretary of State.
In addition to Hilex's $1.08 million, the American Chemistry Council spent about $942,000 on lobbying in that three month stretch. ACC was interested in other legislation too, including a bill that would have tightened restrictions on bisphenol A.
Both the bag and BPA bans failed. But with all that money floating around, you can be sure the legislature will take them up again next year.
Usually Plastics News reporters get to ask questions at trade shows, but at K 2010 one exhibitor turned the tables, interviewing Frank Esposito as part of a social media project.
Dow Chemical Co.'s Erin Kuhl interviewed Frank -- PN's senior reporter who covers materials companies -- for Dow's social media project that I blogged about a few weeks ago.
In the interview (see below), Frank talks about sustainable products and show attendance.
PN readers know Frank already has plenty of on-camera video experience -- he hosts our regular weekly Material Insights webcast.
Here's a common question -- what kind of plastic is "greenest." A researcher at the University of Pittsburgh has compared a variety of plant-based polymers -- along with some traditional commodity thermoplastics.
The results indicate the biopolymers are not necessarily better for the environment than traditional plastic materials -- mainly because conventional plastics can be environmentally less taxing to produce.
The analysis was conducted by Michaelangelo Tabone, who did the study as an undergraduate student in the lab of Amy Landis, a professor of civil and environmental engineering in Pitt's Swanson School of Engineering.
The research team first performed a life-cycle assessment on each polymer's preproduction stage to gauge the environmental and health effects of the energy, raw materials, and chemicals used to create one ounce of plastic pellets. Then they checked each plastic in its finished form against principles of green design, including biodegradability, energy efficiency, wastefulness, and toxicity.
Conventional plastics took the top spots in the life-cycle assessments -- polypropylene was No. 1, followed by high density polyethylene and low density PE. A biopolymer polyhydroxyalkanoate -- placed No. 4.
According to the researchers, bio-based plastics scored poorly because of the pollution they create during the manufacturing process.
The team attributed this to agricultural fertilizers and pesticides, extensive land use for farming, and the intense chemical processing needed to convert plants into plastic. All four biopolymers were the largest contributors to ozone depletion.
Once in use, however, the biopolymers "cleaned up." Looking at the green design criteria, bioplastics took all the top positions: Two varieties of polylactic acid took the No. 1 and No. 4 spots, and two varieties of polyhydroxyalkanoate tied for No. 2.
Biodegradability, obviously, was a big advantage for the bio-based resins on the green design scale. And, using that as a criteria, conventional plastics took a beating. PP, for example, sank to ninth place as a "sustainable" material, judged by the green design criteria.
The story offers a decent overview on bioplastics for Plastics Blog readers who need some help getting their arms around the topic -- which, understandably, has generated a lot of headlines in the past couple of years.
The story asserts that while bioplastics currently make up just 0.2 percent of the 350 million metric tons of plastics consumed annually, the volume could jump 30 percent annually over the next 10 years.
That growth will depend on continued and growing interest by consumer product companies, which are using bio-based resins in packaging and some products. It will also depend on the price of natural gas and oil, because bio-based materials tend to be more competitive with conventional plastics when the cost of energy is high.
The WSJ report also includes a nice slide show of products made from bioplastics, including packaging, foodservice and durable products.
The buzz in the Detroit sports/business circles is that Dow Chemical Co. might be interested in sponsoring a Professional Golf Association event next year in Michigan.
That story did not mention Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical, but it did say that the Detroit Golf Club had already had some serious discussions with an unnamed potential sponsor.
Detroit's WJRT-ABC TV affiliate made the connection between the PGA and Dow in an Oct. 11 report, "Dow may sponsor Detroit PGA event."
The WJRT report notes that GolfWeek magazine earlier this summer mentioned that Dow was interested in sponsoring a PGA event.
According to The Telluride Watch, the Town Council voted 5-2 on Tuesday to approve a ban, making it the first community in Colorado with such a law.
The law takes effect on March 1, and like many other bans it excludes bags used for meat and produce. The Telluride ban also does not apply to prescription drug bags or newspaper bags.
To encourage residents to use durable reusable bags, the Town also is requiring grocery stores to charge a 10-cent-per-bag "advance recovery fee" on paper bags.
According to the Watch's report, one local business owner asked the Town Council to delay implementation of the law and instead put the decision before voters, but the suggestion was rejected.
You might recall that "The Plastics Blog" reported back in 2008 that Telluride had been taking a different approach to the bag issue -- a friendly competition with nearby Aspen, Colo., to see which town could get residents to use reusable bags instead of plastic.
But now Telluride instead is joining the trend of municipalities and counties around the country considering -- and in this case adopting -- a local ban.
You should expect more resort towns in Colorado to follow suit.
A big trade show can be a good place to try a social media strategy. You've got thousands of people in the same place. Many are likely to be interested in what you've got to say about the event -- and about your company. Why not let them know what you're doing, and what you're showing, with tools like Twitter and Facebook?
Dow Chemical Co. is taking that approach at K 2010, the big plastics trade fair set for Oct. 27-Nov. 3 in Dusseldorf, Germany.
Dow built a portal for its efforts at www.dowstrongertogether.com ("Stronger, together" is Dow's theme at K 2010) that links to its Twitter, Facebook and YouTube pages, plus other relevant sites (including the Plastics Blog).
Dow's using Twitter to update its followers about the show. (A typical recent post: What does Tomás Fernández, Dow's LDPE Product Director, Latin America, think about K 2010? Find out at http://tinyurl.com/2uenb98 #K2010 )
Facebook is about interaction, so that's where the company is encouraging discussion, while at the same time sharing information. (As of today, the company has 84 people who "like" the site).
At the show, Dow plans to use YouTube to post daily video news updates.
How will this all work? Will it be worth all the effort? Dow will know in a few weeks, and the company will be able to fine tune its social media strategy for future events.
This might be the biggest leap into social media by a resin company that I've seen.
Congratulations to Silberline Manufacturing Co. Inc., a family-owned effect pigment manufacturer in Tamaqua, Pa., that is celebrating its 65th year in business.
Lisa Jane Scheller, the third-generation president and CEO, hosted guests (including 30-year veteran employees) in an anniversary party at the headquarters.
"Conducting business with integrity and adhering to a strong moral compass were always hallmarks of the company and it's an honor to carry on that responsibility," she said.
Scheller credited the company's longevity to the core values championed by the company's founder, her grandfather, Ernest Scheller, Sr., and by her father, Chairman Ernest Scheller, Jr.
The company is still based in tiny Tamaqua, but it's global in scope these days -- it has facilities in Indiana, Scotland, China, Mexico and Singapore.
California gets most of the attention related to plastic bag bans, but North Carolina actually passed a state-mandated ban that takes effect today.
The Virginian-Pilot newspaper in Norfolk, Va., has a pretty thorough feature story about the Carolina ban.
The ban applies to retailers on the Outer Banks -- specifically, businesses in coastal Currituck, Dare and Hyde counties.
Retailers can continue to use bags they already have in inventory, but they can't buy any more. Plastic is still permitted for meat, fish and produce. Shoppers are encouraged to bring reusable bags from home -- they actually get a discount on purchases if they do.
If they don't, then retailers must offer paper bags with at least 40 percent recycled content.
The bag ban on the Outer Banks is driven by environmentalism, and by tourism.
A spokesman for state Sen. Marc Basnight, who proposed the law, notes: "A littered-up Outer Banks is not what will continue to attract visitors from around the country."
California's Legislature failed to pass a ban on plastic bags on Aug. 31. But you should expect more municipalities and counties around the country to consider local bans in the coming months.
Five years ago, consumer product company Johnson & Johnson set some sustainability-related goals that it hoped to achieve by 2010.
Let's check in and see how J&J did on the plastics-related targets -- much of it related to trying to eliminate PVC packaging.
J&J's "Healthy Planet 2010" project set minimum requirements for using post-consumer plastics, glass and metals in its Consumer segment, as well as a goal to reduce use of PVC packaging across the company.
On the PVC front, J&J looks at primary packaging (which comes into direct contact with the product) and secondary or tertiary packaging (which does not come into direct contact), such as bottle cap seals.
In the company's latest report updating progress on sustainability goals, J&J notes that "validating alternatives to PVC packaging is time-consuming and expensive," but added that "we continue to make progress."
In the Consumer business, J&J has eliminated 100 percent of the PVC in primary packaging, accounting for 2,490 tons of material. It has also elimated 92 percent of the PVC from its Consumer unit's secondary and tertiary packaging, for 884 tons of material. The remaining 82 tons are in bottle neck bands, and J&J said it is evaluating alternatives.
In the Medical Devices and Diagnostics unit, the company has eliminated 100 percent of the PVC from its secondary and tertiary packaging.
The Pharmaceutical unit has seen slower progress: it has eliminated 55 percent from the PVC in its secondary and tertiary packaging, or 19 tons.
Procter & Gamble Co. made a splash with its announcement this week of sustainability goals, including many that will have an impact on the types of plastics packaging it uses in the future.
In P&G's case, the company plans to eliminate all of its PVC packaging within two years.
Kathy Shwiff had an interesting "Inside Track" column yesterday about executives at Spartech Corp. buying shares in the company -- after recent bad news sent the price plummeting.
Remember the Spartech story? The sheet extruder and compounder on Sept. 8 named board member Victoria Holt as its president and CEO, replacing Myles Odaniell. The change came the same day that the company released poor third-quarter financial results that sent its stock price tumbling more than 30 percent.
Shwiff, in her column in The Wall Street Journal, noted that some Spartech executives took advantage of the stock price dip and bought lots of shares.
Holt, for example, bought 72,000 shares for more than $500,000 on Sept. 14. Other senior executives also purchased shares.
The column notes that as a new CEO, Holt might choose to make moves right away that could create more short-term pain for the share price, such as taking charges against earnings. But the insider stock purchases could be a postive sign for Spartech's longer-term prospects.
Jonathan Moreland, director of research for InsiderInsights.com, told Shwiff that the insider purchases show confidence in the new management and are a reason for investors to consider the stock.
"Not in my backyard" is likely the cry of some residents of Clinton, Iowa, as some residents have filed a lawsuit against Archer Daniels Midland Co. complaining about the company's new plant that makes Mirel bioplastics.
The plant opened in March. According to this report from the Quad City Times, 47 plaintiffs who own or rent homes near the plant filed a suit in U.S. District Court in Davenport, Iowa, complaining about noise, odor, light, dust, traffic and vibrations from the plant.
The plaintiffs want damages, and they're asking the court to make ADM stop operating the plant from until the company can address the problems.
I expect the court will encourage ADM to minimize its impact on the neighborhood -- without shutting it down.
In the meantime, all the other depressed communities that would like to have a company invest hundreds of millions of dollars and bring 100 new jobs to their town can sit back and imagine how nice it would be to be in Clinton, Iowa, right now.
Bayer AG's new CEO, Marijn Dekkers, met with the media on Monday, a few days before he officially takes over the chemical giant on Oct. 1.
One of the big questions: what are Dekkers' plans for the plastics business, Bayer MaterialScience?
Some reporters wondered if he plans to sell plastics and use the money to invest in businesses with more perceived upside, like healthcare or crop sciences.
Dekkers told reporters that he has no plans along those lines right now.
"All three main divisions are of strategic importance to me. I don't see the need at the moment to change this portfolio," he said, in this Reuters report. "A fundamental change is currently not on my agenda."
Dow Jones paraphrased Dekkers, saying that the most important thing is for divisions to be competitive and market leaders.
A blog post caused a minor disturbance in some plastics circles yesterday, after a political reporter wrote that a plastics show was moving back to McCormick Place.
The reference to plastics turned out to be a mistake, and the post has since been corrected.
Anyone who saw the original post may have wondered if the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. was having second thoughts about moving NPE 2012 and 2015 to Orlando, Fla.
The post updated readers on the situation at McPier, the agency that runs Chicago's McCormick Place convention center, and was the result of a lunch that Hinz had with McPier boss Jim Reilly.
The post was largely positive, noting that Reilly "seems to be doing some of the right things that the mayor, governor and Illinois General Assembly hired him to do."
Reilly stressed that reforms at McCormick -- all instituted after SPI announced that it was moving NPE away from Chicago -- have succeeded in stopping the exodus of shows from McCormick.
"Once the dust settles, cost-wise, I think we'll be very competitive . . . at or below prices in Las Vegas and Orlando," Reilly told Hinz.
The confusing part for plastics industry readers was a brief reference in the story to a couple of shows that, thanks to the reforms, Chicago had managed to keep.
"...two big shows that had threatened to leave -- representing the plastics and industrial technology sectors -- instead renewed in Chicago..." Hinz wrote.
At least one of Hinz's readers jumped on that snippet, emailing Plastics News a link, saying it was proof that SPI had decided to come back Chicago.
SPI quickly put a wet blanket on that rumor.
SPI President Bill Carteaux sent us this statement this morning: "As announced November 17, 2009, SPI's NPE trade show will be held in Orlando for the next two show cycles: April 1-5, 2012 and March 22-26, 2015."
We pointed this out to Hinz today, and he's now added a short addendum to his original blog post:
"One correction in the above. I wrote down 'plastics' in my notebook about shows that now are staying in Chicago, but the correct show is 'housewares.' The plastics show is still gone to Orlando. Should have double checked."
We're glad to have played a small part in setting the record straight, and perhaps keeping a unsubstantiated rumor from starting to spread.
NPE is going to continue to generate a lot of interest from the political and labor community in Chicago.
You can be sure that they'll want another crack at winning back the shows, which have been such an important -- and lucrative -- business for the city since 1971.
But despite any rumors you hear to the contrary, don't expect that to happen before the 2018 cycle.
A long-anticipated civil trial got started this week in Philadelphia. The plaintiffs in the case allege that a chemical plant in Ringwood, Ill., dumped vinylidene chloride at the site, which caused about 30 residents to develop brain cancer.
The suit, which is actually the first of 31 related cases, is Joanne Branham v. Rohm & Haas Co. The trial is being held in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.
The defendants are Rohm and Haas, Dow Chemical Co. and Morton International. Morton was the original operator of the Ringwood plant,which Rohm and Haas acquired when it bought Morton in 1999. Dow bought Rohm and Haas in 2008.
The plaintiffs allege that vinylidene chloride dumped at the site broke down into vinyl chloride mononer, and caused residents in the area to have higher-than-expected rates of brain cancer.
Lawyers for Rohm and Haas will argue that contamination from the plant could not have reached levels in the water or air to cause cancer, and that studies do not link VCM exposure to brain cancer.
Frederick vom Saal is one of 10 recipients if this year's Heinz Awards.
The awards, presented by Teresa Heinz and the Heinz Family Foundation, recognize extraordinary achievements in environmental issues.
Vom Saal is a University of Missouri professor and long-time leader in the field of research into bisphenol A safety. Here's an excerpt from the Heinz Award web site explaining his role in the issue:
Dr. Frederick vom Saal's groundbreaking research has significantly impacted public health policy as he has uncovered the risks associated with exposure to bisphenol A (BPA), a commonly used chemical ingredient in consumer products, such as baby bottles, receipt paper, food and soda cans. ...
Frederick vom Saal has been one of the leading scientists in demonstrating that human health problems may be preventable by reducing exposures to certain common contaminants, including one, bisphenol A, for which he is, according to many, the world expert. His efforts have borne fruit in the United States and elsewhere around the globe.
Heinz Awards recipients receive a $100,000 cash prize. The awards were established by Teresa Heinz in 1993 to honor the memory of her late husband, U.S. Sen. John Heinz, a Republican who supported environmental causes.
Teresa Heinz is currently married to U.S. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.
A new TV comedy set to premier on Thursday on NBC is at least partially inspired by a real-life plastics executive -- someone many Plastics Blog readers may know.
The show is "Outsourced," about an American novelties company that moves its call center to India, where it is managed by a young American played by Ben Rappaport.
That name may sound familiar because Ben -- the star of the new show -- is the son of Howard Rappaport, global business director for plastics at resin industry consulting firm/conference organizer Chemical Market Associates Inc.
The idea of "Outsourced" predates Ben Rappaport's involvement -- the show is inspired by a 2006 film with the same name.
But nonetheless Ben Rappaport says he is basing his character on his father.
"Outsourced" is starting the season with a prime slot -- right after the season premier of "The Office." So there should be plenty of Dunder Mifflin Inc. fans tuning in to see Rappaport and his colleagues at Mid American Novelties.
Plastics News readers know MBA Polymers Inc., the California company that's developed technology to separate and recycle plastics -- including engineering resins -- from durable products like computers.
Now millions more around the world know about MBA, as the company was featured on Sept. 18 by op-ed columnist Thomas Friedman in The New York Times.
Friedman's column, "Aren't we clever," highlights an oddity that Plastics News has previously covered: Although MBA developed its technology in the United States, right now it does almost all of its plastics recycling in Europe and Asia.
Why? Because even though the U.S. generates more electronic waste than any other country -- and more auto shredder waste than what's created in all of Europe -- there's no infrastructure or incentive for MBA to recycle those materials here at home.
"I employ 25 people in California and 250 overseas," MBA founder Mike Biddle told Friedman. "I am in the E.U. and China because the above-ground plastic mines are there or are being created there ... I am not in the U.S. because there aren't sufficient mines."
Should plastics firms pay to screen Calif. storm drains?
Some communities in Southern California are taking a low-tech approach to reducing plastic marine debris -- they're installing expensive screens on storm drains.
According to this story in the Los Angeles Times, 16 cities are installing the stainless steel screens on nearly 12,000 catch basins -- a project that officials expect to stop 840,000 pounds of debris from reaching the Pacific Ocean each year.
The screens cost up to $4,000 per catch basin -- and Charles Moore with the Algalita Marine Research Foundation is suggesting that the plastics industry should pick up the tab.
"You can't put this external cost to the throwaway society onto the municipalities and taxpayers," he told the Times. "They're asked to do all that work, when really, the plastic industry itself needs to be held responsible."
The screens aren't going to completely stop plastic marine debris -- far from it. According to the story, they won't stop small fragments of plastic, which will escape through the 5-millimeter mesh. And during heavy rains, the devices will swing open to avoid flooding.
Still, if the project is successful at reducing marine debris, expect to see other communities follow California -- and don't be surprised if they make the case that the plastics industry should be responsible for the expense.
Materials developments heating up for America's Cup
America's Cup defender BMW Oracle Racing is building the prototype for a group of six identical 45-foot-long catamarans for team competitions in 2011 "world series" races. The 34th America's Cup event is planned during 2013 using team-built 72-foot-long catamarans possibly in the waters off San Francisco, Valencia, Spain, or Rome, Italy.
A Sept. 16 report in the Rodney Times says that BMW Oracle is manufacturing the scaled-down one-design AC45 fleet at a facility that it acquired on New Zealand's North Island in 2008. The factory in Warkworth, about 38 miles north of Auckland, has polymer-matrix-composite capabilities.
The BMW Oracle team, headed by enterprise-software entrepreneur Larry Ellison, won the 33rd America's Cup on Feb. 13 in Valencia using a trimaran to defeat two-time defending champion Alinghi of Switzerland.
(And thanks to long-time Plastics News correspondent Roger Renstrom -- our resident expert on composites -- for this item.)
A leading plastics recycler, Envision Plastics Industries LLC in Reidsville, N.C., started a new blog yesterday that looks promising.
The company, which has long stressed that North American recyclers need more material, said the blog will address three key areas for plastics recyclers:
Educate on current issues in post-consumer recycling (PCR)
Provide clarification or additional information on issues related to PCR that may not have been presented accurately or been told the complete story by parties with vested interests
Introduce and elaborate on benefits of using PCR
Topics will include legislation, innovations, and positions and opinions plus opportunities to take in-depth looks at news and issues.
Here's a taste, starting with a quote from Scott Mouw, environmental supervisor with teh state's Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance:
In simple terms, the disposal bans are precisely and primarily intended to divert highly marketable recyclable materials away from the waste stream and into the stream of commerce. We have some early indications that the legislation is having that effect and will have extensive data from local governments by late fall that indicate the actual situation.
The next blog post topic: "California's Plastic Bag Ban Legislation - What are the impacts so far?"
The New York Times has a good story today on innovations in 3-D printing. The story, "3-D Printing Spurs a Manufacturing Revolution," highlights several companies including Bespoke, a California firm that uses the technology to make custom prosthetic limbs.
The accompanying video (see below) does a nice job demonstrating state-of-the-art 3-D printing. It also highlights how the price of the technology is becoming much more affordable, and how designers can use it to make moving parts, thanks to the ability to make items out of more than one material
Here's a twist that may muddy the waters in the debate over plastic bag bans -- its a question about the safety of reusable bags.
The Wegmans Food Markets chain in Rochester, N.Y., announced Friday that it will stop selling two reusable shopping bags designs because testing that indicates that they contain elevated levels of lead.
The bags -- decorated with green pea and 2009 holiday designs -- are made in China. The supermarket chain has stores in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia and Maryland.
A consumer group urged other grocery chains to test their bags for heavy metals.
Forbes magazine has an interesting little story in its Sept. 13 issue about Ford Motor Co.'s research into car interior odors.
According to the story, Ford employs five engineers "with exceptionally sensitive noses" who are focused on making sure their cars and trucks don't smell bad.
In fact, their "ultimate goal," according to the story, is to find a scent that "produces a sense of well-being inside a Ford."
This seems like an area where plastics materials suppliers and molders could create new products. My suggestions:
Ford 150 trucks should smell like hot coffee and donuts, perhaps with a hint of chewing tobacco or unfiltered cigarettes.
The Mustang should smell like Axe ... or Old Spice.
The Fusion Hybrid should smell like granola.
The Lincoln MKX should smell like bank lobbies and putting greens.
Is the US ready for recycled plastic building materials?
Jim Kerstein, CEO of composite bridge manufacturer Axion International, believes there's an urgent need to start using recycled plastics in construction applications.
Incorporating more plastics into automobiles was possible in the 1940s -- Henry Ford was a proponent -- and the shift would have reduced manufacturing costs and increased carmakers' profits. But automakers were slow to evolve.
America doesn't have 50 years to adapt to the idea of recycled plastic as a building material. "Couple concerns about the environment with almost unanimous agreement that the nation's infrastructure is in desperate need of repair, and you have what would seem like a perfect storm to drive market acceptance of new composite plastics that are capable of replacing legacy building materials," he wrote.
"...the private sector is so focused on the bottom line that unless you're extremely competitive in the short term, long-term benefits have little value."
Also, "being green doesn't seem to be very relevant when it comes to the decision-making process. While it is icing on the cake, a green solution is what sells the cake."
Recycling, litter, producer responsibility and related issues are on the table in Madison, Wis., where the state legislature's special committee on single-use plastics met for the first time a few weeks ago.
Rep. Spencer Black, chairman of the committee, said in a news release that the panel's job is to "find ways to keep more plastic out of our landfills as waste and out of our landscape as litter."
""Plastic is used widely because it is a very useful and convenient material for agricultural, industrial and commercial purposes. But its widespread use also poses a problem, both as litter and as a major source of waste for landfills," he said. "Plastic, as a petrochemical product, contains a valuable resource that we should seek to use again instead of using it once and throwing it out. Working with business in a cooperative manner, I believe we can draft legislation that will benefit both the environment and the economy."
The committee heard from local and national experts, including representatives from the American Chemistry Council and the Association of Postconsumer Plastics Recyclers.
Just when we thought they'd disappear forever, the plastic shoes that many people seem to love to hate are making a comeback.
The U.K. newspaper the Guardian has a feature story on the comeback today, "Crocs steps back from the brink of business oblivion: A sudden turnaround at Crocs proves the world never really fell out of love with its ugly plastic shoes."
The newspaper cited the company's most recent financial report for the "back from oblivion" reference:
After racking up huge losses in 2008 and 2009, Colorado-based Crocs Inc became a Wall Street joke, with one investment manager comparing the firm a year ago to a zombie. But, in an abrupt turnaround, Crocs has seen its stock leap by 130% in eight months. The company recently delivered a $32m (£21m) quarterly profit following a 31% jump in sales to $228m, prompting its chief executive, John McCarvel, to crow: "We hope those who published our obituary a year ago will now take some time to give us our due."
It goes to show you, you can't predict style trends.
For those who don't remember the plastics details, Crocs are made out of a proprietary closed-cell resin that make them soft, lightweight and odor-resistant.
California columnists: ACC lobbyists won the bag war
Yesterday I blogged about how California residents feel about their legislature failing to pass a ban on plastic bags. Today, we'll let columnists from several California newspapers weigh in.
One common theme: The American Chemistry Council won this battle with a strong lobbying effort.
Patty Fisher of the San Jose Mercury Newsattributed the Senate's "no" vote to "the lobbying blitz of the American Chemistry Council."
I think she's right on target when she says the debate will now shift to local communities. "Before long, there will be individual ordinances all over the state," she wrote in a column today, "The bag ban debate? There's only one way to make it go away."
Steve Lopez of the Los Angeles Times wrote "It took an army of lobbyists to kill California's ban on plastic bags." ACC spent millions opposing the bill, he wrote, adding: "It would have made neighborhoods cleaner and waterways safer for wildlife, but Sacramento is often where good ideas go to die."
John Bogert of the Torrance, Calif., Daily Breeze let legislators have it with both barrels. His column, "Plastic bag lobby shows politicians come cheap," draws a bright line between the contributions given to politicians by the ACC and its members, and the bag ban vote.
But what really bothers me isn't that elected officials appear to sell out. No, what gets me is how they aren't open for competitive bids. C'mon, $1,500? A politician will wag his little doggie tail for an amount a single concerned citizen could raise outside a post office with a tin can and a photo of a sweet otter smothered in a grocery bag?
That's outrageous! The least they could do is open up for online bids so we can all have a chance at being heard. Fact is, I would have paid $1,500 for a vote in favor of a bill to stop this one tiny assault in a massive war on our own planet.
Working together, can plastics and agricultural researchers help create a polylactic acid resin that's capable of handling hot-filled liquids?
That's the aim of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service, which is reporting that USDA chemist William J. Orts is working with Lapol LLC, of Santa Barbara, Calif., in an effort to make corn-derived plastics more heat-tolerant.
The team is developing a 90 percent corn-based modifier that is fully biodegradable that can be blended with PLA to make it more heat-tolerant.
The story quotes Randall L. Smith, chief operating officer at Lapol, who says there currently are no commercially available heat-deflection temperature modifiers for PLA.
Smith said ARS and Lapol are seeking a patent for their invention.
There's a group of consumers who aren't in love with plastic packaging and gadgets, and social networking web sites are helping them share information and ideas.
Terry started the "Plastic Crap" site in July. The mission:
To pull back the curtain and reveal this plastic "convenience" shit for the inconvenient, unsustainable mess it really is.
Upload and tag your photos. Post your links. Include a company address so we can write to them. This page is open to anyone to participate.
I stumbled across the "wall" today via a link from Siel Ju's Mother Nature Network blog.
Siel calls the wall "a fun way to rage against plastic waste."
As of this writing, the wall has just over 1,100 people who "like" it (using the terminology of Facebook), and a pretty active "wall," mostly filled with examples and photos of plastic products that someone, somewhere, doesn't like.
Instead of resorting to bag taxes and bans, some communities and retailers have tried voluntary efforts to reduce bag consumption. Let's check on the status of two -- one small-scale effort, and one on a very large scale.
On the small side, an IGA grocery store in Lennox Head, Australia, announced this week that it is bringing back plastic bags, after 12 months of being bag-free.
The store manager told The Northern Star newspaper that the decision was made due to overwhelming customer feedback.
"Due to customer feedback over the past 12 months we have reintroduced customer choice," the manager told the newspaper. "We have boxes, green bags, paper bags for 17 cents and reusable, biodegradable plastic bags."
Meanwhile, in Britain, groceries are reporting dramatic success with a voluntary effort.
Since the program started four years ago, British retailers say they have cut the number of plastic bags used by 4 billion annually.
Some 6.1 billion carrier bags were handed out in the first five months of 2010, a 43 percent drop from the 10.6 billion handed out 2006, according to the British Retail Consortium.
The Daily Mail -- which is sponsoring a Banish the Bags campaign -- reported that BRC said the figures are a "ringing endorsement" of the voluntary approach taken by supermarkets.
A designer in the United Kingdom is developing a plan to collect and recycle chewed gum and turn it into a plastic that can be molded into new products.
Gross, I know, but interesting.
The designer is Anna Bullus, who, according to her biography, left a job at Chase Furniture in 2008 to set up her own company, Gumdrop Ltd., "to tackle the global problem of gum litter."
Her web site is filled with statistics about the problems caused by gum litter, including the cost of cleaning it up that burdens big cities like London.
For example, she claims that Britain creates, on average, 7,000 metric tons of used gum each year.
More "gum facts" from her site:
On average 30,000 pieces of gum are irresponsibly discarded everyday on Oxford Street in London.
If everyone in the UK stopped irresponsibly discarding their gum on Oxford Street today, it would still take over 4 months to clean the existing gum off the street.
Cleaning chewing gum off the streets in the UK, on average, costs three times the price of a piece of gum.
Three and a half billion pieces of gum are disposed of irresponsibly each year in the UK.
The British Government spends £150 million each year on cleaning gum off the UK's streets.
Nine out of ten city paving stones have gum stuck to them.
Bullus has a solution to the problem: using recycled gum to make a gum-derived plastic that she calls "Bullus Recycled Gum Polymer," or BRGP.
Right now, in several pilot projects, BRGP is being molded into brightly colored pink bins where consumers can toss their used gum. (Not exactly closed-loop recycling, but let's not go there...)
When the bins are full, both the bins and their contents are collected and recycled into new BRGP.
I'm guessing the bins smell sort of fruity.
Eventually, Gumdrop Ltd. hopes to develop other applications for BRGP.
For Plastics Blog readers outside California, here's the advertisement that the American Chemistry Council prepared to fight AB 1998, the bill that would ban plastic bags.
The ad is tough on the state Legislature, accusing it of focusing on a relatively minor issue (banning plastic bags) while it failes to act on more important problems.
The ad also says the ban would be bad for the economy, a burden on consumers, and that it would kill manufacturing jobs.
Bag ban is about politicians 'micromanaging our lives'
The North County Times in Escondido, Calif., recently editorialized against the proposed California plastic bag ban with a column that blasted the legislative "nanny state" trend.
"... if plastic grocery bags can be banned, what other popular consumer items will the nanny state try to take away from us? After all, if plastic grocery bags are bad, then plastic trash bags can't be much better. Or perhaps the gurus in Sacramento will decide that we all have to purchase our movies and music digitally to keep CDs, DVDs and Blu-Rays out of our landfills," the editorial asserts.
"Keeping plastic out of our landfills (and more important, our ocean) is a good idea, so be a good steward and recycle that plastic. And offering tax credits for those who invest in research into biodegradable or recyclable alternatives to the many plastics would be a wise government policy indeed.
"But micromanaging our lives and imposing what amounts to a regressive tax on the poor and middle class -- while fundamental government tasks like passing a budget remain undone -- is, to put it as kindly as possible, irresponsible."
For more on the "nanny state" argument against plastic bans, check out this funny story from the San Francisco Chronicle, which notes that Lt. Gov. Abel Maldonado is using a similar tact against San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.
Maldonado sponsored a booth at the state Republican party convention with a table of products "banned in San Francisco," including plastic water bottles.
"With a pen and piece of paper and an executive order, he bans Pepsi and Coke," Maldonado told The Chronicle. "You know what? If I don't like Pepsi and Coke, I just don't drink it. But if Gavin doesn't like it, he bans it for everybody."
'Majestic Plastic Bag' aimed at Calif. legislature
A video that mimics a nature channel documentary is getting attention in California, where the state Senate is preparing to vote on AB 1998, which would ban plastic bags at some retailers.
The "mockumentary" is narrated by actor Jeremy Irons, and it follows the "migration" of a plastic bag from a grocery store to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
The project was created by advertising firm DDB Los Angeles, working with Heal the Bay. DDB's Regie Miller toldAdvertising Age's Karen Eglof that the team wanted to create a fun video that would engage consumers.
"You can lecture and scold people all you want, but these fist-shakings rarely get passed around," Miller said.
I love the subhead on this one: "Green Initiative Has Unintended Fallout: A Sack as Loud as "The Cockpit of My Jet."
Brad Rodgers, Frito-Lay's North American manager of sustainable packaging, fingers the biobased plastic, polylactic acid, as the cause of the very loud packaging.
The new polymers have a higher "glass transition temperature," which is when a polymer goes from a harder, glasslike state to a rubber state. Because the transition to rubberiness happens a bit above room temperature, the bag is "kind of crispy and crunchy," says Mr. Rodgers.
Don't believe the Sun Chips bag is really all that loud? Check out the video and judge for yourself.
Paper bag maker not happy with Brownsville bag ban
Duro Bag Manufacturing Co. was OK with the city of Brownsville, Texas, banning plastic bags. But now that the city may extend the ban to paper bags, the company is threatening to close its plant and leave town.
Plastics Blog readers may remember that earlier this year, Brownsville became the 12th U.S. city to ban single-use plastic grocery bags.
At the time, we connected the dots and pointed out that Brownsville was home to a big Duro Bag plant that employs 120 and makes about 9 million paper bags a day. The company touts itself as the world's No. 1 paper bag maker.
When the plastic ban was adopted, a Duro official told The Brownsville Herald that the ban was "for the good of the community, for the good of the people and the environment."
But now the tables have been turned.
According to the Valley Morning Star, an amendment to the plastic bag ban, proposed by city's Environmental Advisory Committee, would remove language in the original ordinance that specifically exempts "recyclable paper bags" from the ban.
City Commissioner Edward C. Camarillo told the newspaper that the change is not aimed at banning paper bags.
"Nobody is trying to ban paper bags," he said. "We are not banning paper bags."
But that's not how Duro is reading the latest developments. The newspaper says that Chris Klein, Duro's environmental director, thinks the revision is clearly aimed at banning most paper bags.
"Company officials said the company would have no choice but to move if paper bags were banned," the story says.
What happened to bag bans being "for the good of the community, for the good of the people and the environment"?
The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. calls the passage of the Manufacturing Enhancement Act of 2010 "a hard-earned victory for job creation and the competitive hopes of American plastics manufacturers."
I blogged earlier today about SPI President Bill Carteaux attending the White House ceremony today (Aug. 11) where President Barack Obama signed the act into law.
Here's what SPI has to say about the law today:
SPI's advocacy team worked tirelessly over two-plus years to strongly encourage Congress to pass the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill (H.R. 4380). The legislation renews a number of expired tariff measures and reduces duties on manufacturing materials (including several essential to the plastics industry) that are not produced domestically, thus lowering costs for U.S. manufacturers. The bill, now formally named the Manufacturing Enhancement Act of 2010, was approved by both the U.S. House and Senate in late July.
"It was an honor to attend the ceremony today and the occasion marks real progress toward leveling the playing field for U.S. plastics manufacturers competing in the global marketplace," said Carteaux. "This law will cut the cost of doing business for SPI members and the entire U.S. plastics industry. Free from the burden of tariffs on manufacturing inputs not produced in the U.S., plastics companies will find it less challenging to maintain or increase their current workforce, spur investments and eventually help turn the tide in the nation's economic recovery."
Obama highlighted a few plastics-related examples in his remarks:
"The Manufacturing Enhancement Act of 2010 will create jobs, help American companies compete, and strengthen manufacturing as a key driver of our economic recovery," Obama said. "And here's how it works. To make their products, manufacturers -- some of whom are represented here today -- often have to import certain materials from other countries and pay tariffs on those materials. This legislation will reduce or eliminate some of those tariffs, which will significantly lower costs for American companies across the manufacturing landscape -- from cars to chemicals; medical devices to sporting goods. And that will boost output, support good jobs here at home, and lower prices for American consumers."
Every so often, I come across a plastics-related idea that's so ridiculous that I try to ignore it, rather than sharing it with Plastics Blog readers.
The "Recycled Island" is just such an idea.
You may have seen stories on this project. Whim Architecture, a Dutch firm, has suggested using plastic waste floating in the Pacific Ocean to create a massive floating island.
The island -- check out the colorful illustration -- would use 44 million kilograms of plastic waste to create 3,861 square miles of "sustainable living space," where islanders could live on fishing and agriculture.
The aim is to create a floating environment for 500,000 people, powered by solar energy and wave motion.
When I first saw news reports about "Recycled Island" in June, I tried my best to ignore them. Seriously, no one is going to use recycled plastic to build a 3,861-square-mile island for 500,000 people in the Pacific Ocean.
This is not the answer to the plastics industry's marine debris problem -- it's a pipe dream.
But the project continues to generate headlines around the world. So I'm going on the record and saying -- enough. Please.
To help support my case -- that "Recycled Island" should be known as "Ridiculous Island" -- consider today's blog post from Miriam Goldstein, a doctoral student at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
The main problem is this: The vast majority of plastic bits (>90%) are smaller than a pencil eraser, and are spread out enough to be mostly invisible to the naked eye. It is therefore extremely hard to remove the plastic without catching a lot of ocean life. ...
The "Recycled Island" folks may be able to build a giant island out of recycled plastic - I am not an architect and I have no idea if this is feasible. (Though I hope they know that there are hurricanes in Central Pacific...) But I do know that it would be very, very difficult to remove a significant percentage of the plastic without catching a ton of zooplankton. And catching and killing tons of marine life would not be a good way to meet the criteria of the project.
Which happens to be to save marine life.
I could say a lot more about how little is known about the impacts of plastic in the North Pacific Central Gyre, or about the ridiculous notion that adding a giant land mass would "return more balance" to the open ocean - but I've got to sleep sometime. So to summarize, I do not think Recycled Island is feasible because it would be environmentally damaging to collect enough plastic in the North Pacific Central Gyre to build their enormous island.
Hear hear.
Projects like "Recycled Island" may help focus attention on the marine debris problem, which could be a good thing.
But there's also a risk that some sector of the public will think, "Hey, we don't need to worry about this any more, because I read a story about some Dutch conservationists who are building an island with all of our plastic waste."
Creating an island out of recycled plastic may be "romantic," or at least visually exciting. But the real solution to the marine debris problem is to stop creating marine debris.
Banning bags kills jobs, won't help the environment
After my post yesterday about the bag ban debate in California, Plastics News staff reporter Mike Verespej pointed out another column on the topic worth sharing with blog readers.
It's a strong column, which you'd expect from Kelly, a former BusinessWeek reporter, and now CEO of Emerald Packaging Inc., a family-owned firm in Union City, Calif., that makes printed plastic produce bags.
Kelly says the immediate impact of a bag ban would be the loss of jobs:
Today, plastic bag manufacturing employs thousands of Californians, including the 175 workers at my factory in Union City. These good-paying manufacturing jobs -- many of my workers make more than $20 an hour with health and dental benefits -- are at risk if this bill becomes law. Several thousand more of our residents working for suppliers to the industry could also be on the way to unemployment, and their families to public assistance.
Not to worry, says Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Woodland Hills. She insists that there won't be job losses because companies that produce plastic bags will "retool" to make reusable bags.
What a joke. The type of reusable bag that Brownley wants can be competitively made only in China because of labor cost. Today, China and other low-wage Asian countries make virtually 100 percent of the reusable bags in the United States. If Brownley has a secret business plan for allowing domestic companies to compete with low-wage Chinese firms that face almost no regulation and are underwritten by the government, she should detail it. Until then, simply flipping the switch to produce reusable bags is not a realistic option.
The truth is Brownley has made her peace with sacrificing jobs during the worst labor market since the Great Depression in exchange for a supposed environmental benefit. The tragedy is that benefit won't materialize.
Kelly makes some good, common-sense points about why banning T-shirt bags would not result in the reduction in bag use -- despite what proponents of the ban are predicting.
Kelly asserts that, for hygenic reasons, meat, fish and produce would need to be wrapped separately in plastic bags. On top of that, reusable bags must be washed periodically, requiring water, energy and polluting soaps.
In addition, consumers who currently use "single-use" bags to line their garbage cans and to pick up pet waste would have to start buying those bags, he says.
Check the link for more of Kelly's thoughts on the issue.
The debate is heating up on a proposal in California that would ban some plastic grocery bags.
Assembly Bill 1998 would ban grocery stores from giving out plastic bags and require customers to pay at least 5 cents for each paper bag.
Let's take a look at some of the viewpoints expressed about AB 1998 on various news-oriented websites today.
Thomas D. Elias, a syndicated columnist who writes about California state issues, is in favor of the ban/tax. His column today, "Plastic bag fee is a tax you don't have to pay," cites three reasons: "Oil, crowded landfills and the persistence of plastic."
Plastic comes from oil; each plastic bag not used is a small step toward energy independence. Meanwhile, using fewer paper bags would contribute to reducing greenhouse gases by keeping more trees intact.
Plus, many landfills are near capacity and the more trash piled into them, the greater the pressure to create new ones farther and farther out from where urban residents actually produce their trash. Then there's the ubiquitous nature of plastic bags: What swimmer hasn't washed up against one at an ocean beach; who hasn't seen them blowing in the wind?
But here's the real reason the so-called bag tax and the partial plastic bag ban are good ideas: This is one tax you don't have to pay. Reuse existing plastic or paper bags and there's no charge. Use cloth or rattan bags, backpacks or some other container, and you'll also avoid any levy.
Elias has a bias in favor of paper bags that isn't fully explained. He says: "Paper bags are neither as pernicious nor as persistent as plastic. They can be used several times if their bottoms stay dry and they decompose in landfills."
Is he aware of the lifecycle studies that give an edge to plastic over paper? I don't see the logic behind treating them differently.
Tim Shestek of the American Chemistry Council is opposed to the ban-tax bill.
As you consider this issue, keep in mind that this year, the Vacaville Police Department has to cut nearly $1 million from its budget. A budget cut of this size takes uniforms off the streets. But fear not -- AB 1998 will create its own force of "bag police." They won't keep our streets safe, but they'll be sure to fine any mom and pop store giving out grocery store bags -- up to $10,000. It's just another layer of misguided government bureaucracy.
We need jobs. We need teachers and real police. We need a state budget. Lawmakers should focus on these urgent problems facing Californians, not "paper or plastic?"
This looks like ACC is taking a page out of its successful playbook from Seattle, where it emphasized the cost of the bag tax to consumers and convinced voters to reject a proposed 20-cent fee on both plastic and paper bags last year.
On top of that, ACC is stressing that the industry has made an effort in California to recycle plastic bags -- and the Legislature should give that a chance to succeed rather than pulling out the rug and banning plastic bags.
Recycling creates jobs, after all, and if consumers can keep their bags and recycle them too, perhaps that can be a long-term solution to the state's marine debris and litter problem.
The Plastiki -- the all-recycled-PET catamaran that's been sailing across the Pacific Ocean since February -- has reached its destination in Sydney, Australia.
The last 200 nautical miles of the 10,000-nautical-mile journey were made with the help of a tow, after the main sail was damaged off the Queensland coast.
Captain David de Rothschild told the Sunshine Coast Daily: "To date we have made a number of routine and unplanned stops during the voyage and this tow and stop will be no different."
For more background, including a video and lots of links, check these earlier Plastic Blog posts that featured the Plastiki:
Add Mark and Melanie Rummel to the list of bloggers who say they're trying to live a plastics-free lifestyle.
The newlywed couple from Texas has a goal of buying nothing made of plastic for the next year, and they've set up a blog, nonewplastic.com, to share their story.
Susy Solis from the NBC affiliate in Dallas/Fort Worth has a story on the couple that sheds some light on the 4-month-old experiment.
According to the story, the Rummel's are continuing to find new ways to use less plastic --- but they say living completely without plastic is almost impossible.
"For us, it's more about, 'This is how we see a sustainable way of living, and that's how we want to live,'" Melanie Rummel said.
The other day, Mark and I went to our beloved Whole Foods to get groceries. As always, we made our way to the cheese counter and munched on the samples, bemoaning our inability to find plastic-free cheese. Then, I had an idea. I asked Brian behind the counter if there was a certain day they cut the wheels of cheese so we could get some not wrapped in plastic. He explained to us that they cut different wheels every day. Then, he asked if there was a certain cheese we would like that he could cut fresh for us right there. Heck yeah! I asked him about the cheese I'd already taken several samples of, a sharp cheddar, and he pointed out to me that even the wheel doesn't have plastic on it! Mark and I agreed to get a pound of the cheese.
We watched Brian get the cart to carry the large wheel of cheese to the counter. He peeled away the canvas it had been shipped in and used a wire cheese cutter to cut it open for us. As soon as he cut the wheel, he used a tool to dig out the first bite and gave it to us to taste. Several months ago, Mark and I took a Tour of Italy's Wine and Cheeses class at Whole Foods, and we learned that the cheese tastes the best within 20 minutes of the wheel being opened. It certainly was incredibly delicious!
After it was cut, Brian agreed to put it in our cloth produce bag. After weeks of not buying cheese, I was so thankful, I cried a little.
There are also quite a few posts about their efforts to potty-train their cat -- all to avoid the plastic components of kitty litter bags!
He links the BP oil spill to the marine debris issue, pointing out that according to some estimates, "the amount of oil used to produce plastic every day is the same amount as the oil that is spilling into the Gulf of Mexico every day from the damaged Deepwater Horizon drilling rig."
Browne then ties marine debris to bisphenol A safety, charging that plastic water bottles are made from BPA, "a known 'endocrine disruptor', which can mimic the body's hormones and can have side effects."
Despite the level of detail in the column, there's no evidence here that Browne knows that BPA is a precursor to polycarbonate, or that most plastic water bottles are made from PET, not polycarbonate.
In fact, he writes that last year his touring production company "decided to eliminate plastic water bottles from the list of things we are provided in the venues we perform in. Now we carry two five-gallon coolers, and each of the band and crew carries a stainless-steel water bottle."
It is more likely, of course, that those five-gallon coolers are made from polycarbonate than the single-serve bottles they replaced.
My favorite snippet from Browne is what he has to say about recycling:
The plastics industry insists that all we have to do is recycle. But why should we bear the cost and responsibility of recycling it? Why should we buy the stuff and then pay to dispose of it? In the case of the oceans, we will never be able to clean them up faster than the rate plastic is going in.
The answer is to stop producing it, to stop buying it. A few years ago I was on a remote beach in Spain and spent the day cleaning it up with another guy there, a German. It was mostly plastic. He muttered that the locals didn't appreciate the natural beauty of the place.
Both of us assumed it had been thrown away there carelessly, perhaps dumped there. But now I don't think so. I can see now that it had all washed up there. Humans are slobs.
There's no way around it. We are slobs. I know surfers who travel the world and ride the planet's most remote waves. They say there are plastic bottles washing up in Antarctica, in Patagonia, and all of the most distant and pristine beaches in the world.
Interesting take. Is that a popular opinion among environmentalists, that the public can't be trusted to recycle, so the answer to litter problems is to stop manufacturing products?
In my regular searches for news about plastics, I tend to see a lot of comments from celebrities about plastic packaging. I read them all, but I share very few with readers of the blog.
But Browne touches on so many issues in his column today, I made an exception.
Washington, D.C., has generated more than $1 million in revenue to date from its 6-month-old tax on plastic and paper bags.
The Christian Science Monitorreports that Washington collected about $150,000 from the 5-cent-per-bag tax in January -- the first month -- and revenues have increased each subsequent month, reaching $226,000 in May.
Revenues totaled $942,000 for January through May, so they've certainly topped $1 million by now. The funds are earmarked to clean up the Anacostia River.
The headline on the Monitor's story, "Plastic bags: Untapped tax gold mine?" is sure to attract attention.
So is it a "gold mine"? Not exactly.
While nearly $1 million is not chump change, in the context of that city's $6.1 billion general fund budget, it's no windfall, either. Perhaps the more significant result of the measure is that plastic bag use decreased sevenfold in the city after its implementation. Only 3 million bags were distributed in January (the first month of the tax) compared with 22.5 million per month in 2009.
The same was true in Ireland - the only country to institute a plastic bag tax, back in 2002. Plastic bag use dropped 94 percent within weeks of its passage.
The story quotes an expert from the Tax Foundation, who says that no matter how much money the tax generates, supporters will claim it a success.
If the tax brings in a lot of money to clean up the river, supporters will applaud. If it brings in little revenue, they'll say the tax is successful because it's discouraging people from using single-use bags.
Pete Grande, president and CEO of Command Packaging in Vernon, Calif., wrote a powerful defense of plastic bags in an op-ed column published today on the Los Angeles Times Web site.
Headlined "The unintended consequences of a plastic bag ban," Grande writes that if California adopts a ban on plastic bags, consumers would switch to environmentally unfriendly paper bags, and the state would lose jobs.
"Simply put, the phrase 'Ban the bag' is a sound bite, not a solution. It's a proposal that will make legislators feel good rather than do good. In fact, it will do much harm," Grande wrote.
Here are the facts. First, the ban will have an immediate impact. I disagree with those who say that banning plastic bags won't be effective. I believe it will be effective -- at killing jobs. At my factory alone, 200 people will lose good-paying jobs almost immediately. This comes at a time when our state budget is running a $19-billion deficit and when our state economy has an unemployment rate higher than 12%. Obviously, this is not the time to be pursuing regulatory policies that will kill jobs and hurt our economy.
Second, this ban will not only be bad for the economy, it will be bad for the environment. Studies demonstrate that plastic bags leave a lighter footprint on the earth than paper bags. Yet the proposed law would promote more paper bags and harm our ability to recycle. Ironically, stores and consumers shifted to plastic bags was because of environmental concerns about using paper bags. Now, in a complete reversal, we are on the verge of passing a law that will greatly increase the use of paper bags, thus destroying trees and increasing emissions of greenhouse gases, the leading cause of global warming. Is that smart environmental policy?
The goal of the bill may be to reduce first-use bags, but the net effect is simply a replacement of plastic bags with paper bags. And that's bad news for anyone who cares about the environment. An Environmental Impact Report by Los Angeles County acknowledges that if plastic bags are banned, 85% of consumers would switch to paper bags instead of reusable bags. We have seen this to be true in places where plastic bags have been eliminated, including San Francisco, Whole Foods and Trader Joe's. And what would this switch to paper bags mean for global warming? According to the figures in the report, 85% of Californians switching to paper bags would be the equivalent greenhouse gas emissions of between 250,000 and 550,000 more cars on the road every year. That's because life-cycle analysis calculates that paper bags result in more than three times the greenhouse emissions as plastic bags.
Grande writes that he opposes the excessive use of packaging, including plastic bags, and he urges readers to reuse or recycling bags, and not take more bags than they need at the store.
"That's the right way to curb plastic bag use. The wrong way is with a piece of legislation that ignores the facts and stirs fears. Any solution to this issue must be grounded in reality and deal with the fact that a ban on plastic bags will lead to job losses and more paper bags that will negatively affect the environment.
"Let's not ban the bag; let's bag the ban."
Grande's column is a response to the LA Times' own editorial on the topic, published June 24, which supported a state ban on plastic grocery bags.
"Banning plastic grocery bags" made the case that plastic bags "are a nuisance to the land, sea and animals. The state Senate should stand up to the bag industry and ban them by passing AB 1998."
PLAIN TWP. -- Amish-built outdoor furniture made from recycled plastic milk jugs is now available at Amish World, 3939 Everhard Rd. NW.
The "poly lumber" furniture is equivalent in weight and size to traditional hardwood patio furniture. The company says it has a 20-year warranty and will withstand all types of weather.
Electrolux wants to make vacuums from marine debris
Appliance maker Electrolux AB says it wants to make vacuum cleaners from plastic waste harvested from the world's oceans.
The project, called "Vac from the sea," would solve two problems, according to the company's video (see below).
First, it would help clean up the garbage patches. Second, it would boost the supply of recycled plastics that durable goods makers could use.
"The supply of sustainable raw material, such as recycled plastic, is crucial for making sustainable appliances, and assisting consumers in making their homes greener," Hans Stråberg president and CEO of Electrolux, says on a web page explaining the project.
"I therefore hope you will join us in raising awareness about the threat plastic poses to marine habitats, and the urgent need for taking better care of the plastic that already exists."
Electrolux isn't new to using recycled plastic. In the past few months, we've had a couple of stories about their Ergospace Green project, a canister vacuum made using 55 percent recycled plastic.
In that case, the material was supplied by MBA Polymers Inc. of Richmond, Calif.,, which uses automotive shredder residue as the raw material.
So while Electrolux's "vac from the sea" project sounds a little wacky -- how can a company mold a product from a feedstock that's so contaminated? -- this is a company that has a track record for using hard-to-recycle materials.
I expect they'll find a way -- and the right partners -- to make this work.
The New York Times has a story today about Jean Hill, the 82-year-old activist -- critics call her "a retiree with too much time on her hands" -- who managed to make it illegal to sell bottled water in Concord, Mass.
"Where Thoreau Lived, Crusade Over Bottles" manages to paint a portait of a city where a single citizen, through persistence, successfully convinces the majority of voters in her community to ban water bottles.
"I'm going to work until I drop on this," Hill told Abby Goodnough from the Times. "If you believe in something, you have to persist and you have to have a thick skin."
Plastic is clearly the prime target here -- the story notes that Hill started her crusade after her grandson told her about the Pacific garbage patch. She complains that millions of plastic water bottles were disposed of daily, and most are not recycled.
The International Bottled Water Association, rather than the plastics industry, is the leading industry authority quoted in the story. IBWA spokesman Tom Lauria says: "Some people in the industry kind of respect her because of her age and her vision ... but we believe that vision is distorted. There are far worse products to pick on than water."
110 years sounds like quite a streak, but the FT story points out that prior to Great Britain taking the crown in the 1850s, China had probably held the title for 1,500 years!
"If you have a country with four times the population of the U.S. and a tenth of the wages, it is fairly obvious they will pull ahead at some time in productive capabilities," economist Hal Sirkin told the Daily Mail.
Put into that perspective, the U.S. loss doesn't seem as significant.
Still, it's no surprise that the data from IHS Global Insight is getting attention.
There are plenty of experts lamenting the weakness in the U.S. manufacturing sector, and the fact that it's China taking the crown will feed the complaints that China doesn't play fair on the global stage.
New infrastructure that leverages private investment in plant and equipment, and modernizes our nation's communication networks, electric grids and air, sea and land transportation systems.
R&D that's cutting edge.
Education that leads the world, especially in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
A "pro-trade" policy that creates a "level playing field" with limited tariffs and barriers to entry.
An alternative energy strategy that will secure the abundant energy that industry needs to stay competitive.
Regulatory reform, "especially as concerns the environment. Regulation is necessary, but smart regulation isn't always practiced. All too often, we see rules that bog down product innovation or that lack a solid scientific basis."
A tax policy that supports manufacturing.
Tort reform.
"America needs an integrated and strategic approach that will incentivize manufacturers to create the jobs of the future," Liveris wrote.
Tired of looking at a vacant lot that some investor is sitting on, waiting for the market to bounce back? How about filling it, temporarily, with a plastic iceberg?
According to the item, international design firm Woods Bagot "has come up with a cool fix for the plethora of unsightly stalled building sites that dot the city's landscape."
The firm is proposing filling each site with an "iceberg" -- a recyclable structure with angular, bright-wight strutures that resemble an iceberg, that "would serve as sort of architectural placeholders while developers struggle to regroup and restart their projects."
The icebergs would be made of steel beams covered with a thin plastic film. The structures could be quickly removed when the construction project is ready to move ahead.
Check the link to the Crain's NY story to see an illustration of the iceberg concept.
Woods Bagot "has yet to build any icebergs, but it is in talks with several developers," the story says.
Thanks to the Cleveland Plain Dealer's John Soeder for a bit of trivia about a favorite plastic icon: The energy dome "hats" worn by the musical group Devo aren't just upside-down flower pots.
I was forced to go to Catholic school [at St. Patrick School in Kent, Ohio] when I was a kid. I was traumatized by the priests and the nuns, so I would sit in class and stare up at the ceiling.
The good thing about the building is that it was a very beautiful old Art Deco building. It had these light fixtures that were exactly the red hats, but imagine if they were upside down, hanging from the ceiling on three chains, with the bulb hidden inside. They weren't red; they were white milk glass. But exactly those proportions, exactly that size.
So it was just this epiphany one day -- I'll just use that shape, turn it around and paint it red like the cancellator helmet out of this 'Nancy' comic book. It was those two things: We'll make it the shape of the Art Deco ceiling fixture from my grade school, but we'll make it bright red like Nancy's cancellator helmet, and we'll put a hat liner inside so it can hover on your head.
There you go. I've been to St. Patrick's elementary school in Kent (thanks CYO basketball...), but I didn't bother looking up at the lights. Perhaps a blog reader in Kent can confirm the shape. I can't tell when the Devo guys are serious, or if they're just messing with the spuds.
Either way, music and marketing go hand-in-hand these days, and Casale pointed out that Devo fans can get their own energy domes -- now in a serene blue that was selected by a focus group (again, really?), on the band's web site, clubdevo.com.
"We found a manufacturer that uses the best ABS plastic, so they're nice and stiff, Casale said. "They're hard to break, and the color is beautiful."
It's been 15 years since Ball Corp. joined the PET bottle market. The decision, announced today, to sell the business to Amcor Ltd. for $280 million says a lot about the rapidly changing market.
Ball first made noise about entering the PET market in 1994. "We anticipate being in the market in 1995," Harold Sohn, then-vice president for corporate relations, told Plastics News in a Dec. 4, 1994 story. "We have been exploring the opportunities there might be to enter the market at a high level."
At the time, the company was the third-largest maker of glass packaging in the world, and it was No. 4 in both metal beverage cans and metal food cans.
In anticipation of the move, the company formed a plastic container division, and had staffed it with three former executives from Atlanta-based Constar International Inc.
Packaging analyst Tim Burns told us at the time that Ball was a big player in two very mature packaging markets, glass and metal, and was interested in finding a position where more growth was possible.
"This is a plain case of Ball facing the music, seeing the PET parade going by, and knowing that they need to get into the parade," Burns said.
This, apparently, was a company that had done its homework. If anyone was ever prepared to tackle a big, important new market, Ball was ready in PET.
Within weeks, Ball had made its move.
Ball was building its first PET bottle plant in California to supply Pepsi-Cola Co. The rest of the PET market had to take notice -- this was a new player that had the ability to hit the ground running.
In May, George Sissel, then president and CEO of Ball Corp., went to New York for the PaineWebber Packaging Wrap-Up to tell the investors and analysts how excited he was to be in PET.
Compared with Ball's traditional glass, steel and aluminum product lines, PET looked like a growth market. Sissel added that Ball already made either glass or metal packaging for most of its potential PET bottle customers.
"I'm not preoccupied with whether or not we're late entering the PET market,'' he said. "If we're late, so be it. But we're not too late. And if we had waited another year, we'd be even later."
"In our opinion, the growth is still in its infancy," he added.
Now, 15 years later, Ball is getting out of PET. The market has changed dramatically. Carbonated soft drink makers moved to self-manufacturing -- a trend that was already beginning before Ball's move. As the CSD market matured, consumers turned to water, sports drinks, energy drinks and tea -- and those bottlers, too, turned to self-manufacturing.
That's the big picture, at least. There's still room in the market for custom blow molders. But clearly its not the potential high-margin, high-growth niche that Ball was hoping to capitalize on back in 1994.
According to a recent report from the International Bottled Water Association, U.S. consumption of bottled water dropped 2.5 percent in 2009. Likewise, consumption of carbonated soft drinks fell 2.3 percent; sports drinks fell 12.3 percent; packaged fruit beverages fell 2 percent; and flavored and vitamin-added bottled water dropped 8.8 percent.
Those aren't numbers that make your CFO -- or your investors -- smile.
Meanwhile, bottles have downsized to the point where they're more like bags than rigid containers, and profit margins have gotten to be razor-thin. The PET market is officially mature.
Some still hope for a "next big breakthrough" -- like beer packaging. But the fact that Eastman Chemical Co. also is looking to exit PET is a pretty clear sign that the changes in this sector of the industry have been powerful.
It's been interesting to watch these changes first-hand, and I look forward to seeing how Amcor's strategy will succeed.
Cable TV's Sundance Channel is airing "Addicted to Plastic," a documentary by Ian Connacher.
Sundance describes it as "an international odyssey revealing the disturbing long-term effects of the most ubiquitous and versatile material ever invented. From water bottles and Styrofoam cups to toothbrushes and garbage bags, in less than a century the pervasive presence of plastics has marked every ecosystem and all aspects of human activity. Visually compelling, entertaining and thought provoking, ADDICTED TO PLASTIC is both a wake-up call and an inspiring consideration of possible recycling or down-cycling solutions."
The film is the result of three years of filming in 12 countries on 5 continents, including two trips to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, according to Bulfrog Films.
The film details plastic's path over the last 100 years and provides a wealth of expert interviews on practical and cutting edge solutions to recycling, toxicity and biodegradability. These solutions - which include plastic made from plants - will provide viewers with a new perspective about our future with plastic.
In the eastern time zone, Sundance will air the film tonight at 8:30 and 11:45 p.m., then again on Sunday at 10:30 a.m.
Bioplastics are a hot topic among recyclers -- especially biodegradable resins. Are processors paying attention?
Dordan Manufacturing Co. Inc., a thermoformer in Woodstock, Ill., has been studying the issue for some time, and today Chandler Slavin, the company's sustainability coordinator, posted a thoughtful item on the topic.
"Taken together, one would assume that the 2005 Ingeo PLA is a more sustainable option than traditional plastics, as manifest through this study," she concludes. "However, it is important to take into account the other dimensions discussed above, such as end of life management, complete biodegradation, and sustainable sourcing. By understanding the advantages and disadvantages of bio-based resins from an environmental perspective, packaging professionals can make informed material selections and truly comprehend the ecological ramifications of their packaging selections and designs."
It's nice to see a processor taking the time to do the research into the pros and cons of using bioplastics, and I know that Dordan isn't alone. I get a few phone calls a month from processors with questions about what materials are "most sustainable," and I know others at Plastics News get the same question.
As I wrote back in January, I think most processors are willing and able to adapt to their customers' materials-related sustainability goals -- they just need information and guidance.
Processors are flexible about using recycled content, or bio-based resins, or switching from one virgin material to another. It all depends on cost, performance and what the customer wants.
UMass Lowell today broke ground on a $70 million Emerging Technologies and Innovation Center, which will soon be home to research in fields including plastics engineering, nanotechnology, biomedicine and electro-optics.
The center is scheduled to be completed in 2012.
"The seeds of the next industrial revolution will be planted by the research conducted inside this building," UMass Lowell Chancellor Marty Meehan said at the groundbreaking, according to a news release from the university.
Private donations will help make the facility a reality. Included on the list of donors are Mark and Elisia Saab of Lowell, who co-own medical tubing company Advance Polymers Inc. in Salem, N.H. The pair will donate $750,000 to the ETIC.
The building will include:
Critiical controls for temperature, humidity and vibration necessary for research;
Cleanroom space, wet lab, engineering lab space and a plastics processing high bay;
A plastics museum representing contributions to the industry by Massachusetts companies;
An outdoor quad-style gathering space that mirrors the original Lowell Tech buildings;
Meeting areas on each floor for use in collaborative efforts with industry, government and academic partners.
The story, "One woman's mission to be plastic-free," is about Jean Healge, who made some drastic lifestyle changes about 2 years ago because she was concerned about the chemicals used in plastics.
She bakes her own bread now, for example, and makes her own toothpaste. Healge also buys most of her grocery staples from bins and from farmers' markets, and she doesn't store anything in plastic containers.
It's interesting to see the lengths that consumers need to make to avoid plastic packaging. But I was really hoping that someone would point out in the story that although there wasn't much plastic in her refrigerator, the refrigerator itself was clearly, at least in part, made of plastic.
Also, she pointed out there she did have a couple of plastic bottles in her refrigerator -- one for ketchup, one for mustard. That surprised me -- you can't find any ketchup or mustard in glass bottles anymore? I'll have to look the next time I'm in the store.
The legislation caps labor costs and let exhibitors do their own set-up instead of using convention center union workers. It also doubles the ground transportation tax charged on cab rides to and from the airports.
The Senate voted 51-2 Thursday afternoon to override Quinn's veto. The House followed soon after with a 93-19 vote, making the bill law.
It's safe to say that this wouldn't have happened if the city had not lost the 2012 and 2015 NPE shows to Orlando, Fla. By itself, that might not have been enough to get the politicians to act. But after the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. voted to leave Chicago, other trade show organizers also took action -- some of them leaving McCormick, others threatening to leave.
The law -- the final version of Senate Bill 28 -- has this to say about SPI's role in the reform:
In 2009, managers of the International Plastics Showcase announced that 2009 was the last year they would host their exhibition at McCormick Place, as they had since 1971, because union labor work rules and electric and food service costs make it uneconomical for the show managers and exhibitors to use McCormick Place as a convention venue as compared to convention facilities in Orlando, Florida and Las Vegas, Nevada. The exhibition used over 740,000 square feet of exhibit space, attracted over 43,000 attendees, generated $4.8 million of revenues to McCormick Place, and raised over $200,000 in taxes to pay debt service on convention facility bonds.
After the International Plastics Showcase exhibition announced its departure, other conventions and exhibitions managers and exhibitors also stated that they would not return to McCormick Place and Navy Pier for the same reasons cited by the International Plastics Showcase exhibition. In addition, still other managers and exhibitors stated that they would not select McCormick Place as a convention venue unless the union labor work rules and electrical and food service costs were made competitive with those in Orlando and Las Vegas.
I still find this all a little hard to believe. Did an exhibitor's complaint about the price of Pepsi really shake the foundation of the US trade show industry? It's certainly more complicated than that, but you can draw the connections.
Next up, we'll see if exhibitors and attendees at NPE2012 really save as much money as they've been promised -- and how the show in Orlando compares with what everyone is used to in Chicago.
NPE2012 is less than two years away -- remember, it will be in April instead of June next time. So we'll learn the answers to those questions before you know it.
peHUB.com, a web site for private equity investors, says there are promising investment opportunities being created by "plastics paranoia" -- namely, capitalizing on the public's fear of bisphenol A.
Senior writer Alexander Haislip posted a column today headlined "Plastics Paranoia Poses VC Profit Potential." He writes that even if some of the studies critical of BPA may not be correct, "doubt certainly opens up opportunities for competition. After all, BPA production is a $6 billion a year business -- and both investors and entrepreneurs should see this as a big fat opportunity."
But working with plastic is not without its challenges. For investors, it means getting garlic, crucifixes and holy water to tread into the badlands of materials science, where companies are quietly killed in the crib when their science projects fail to yield real products. It means having to work Dow, Dupont and dozens of other major chemical companies, learning to license effectively and optimizing the OEM process. And it means pulling products out of laboratories, hand-holding scientists and engaging non-techie executives and entrepreneurs.
Talk to the investors who are putting their money into plastics and you'll hear variations on the same theme: Tomorrow's biggest successes are going to be driven by materials. "The big gains will come from manipulating molecules instead of manipulating bits," says Martin Lagod, co-founder of Firelake Capital Management, which invests in both private and public companies focused on materials science and energy, water and information technologies. "This is going to be a major trend that's going to play out over the next 10 to 40 years."
Haislip wrote about some of the BPA replacement opportunities in a more general column about plastics in February for Venture Capital Journal.
Typically I think by the time the financial press discovers a business opportunity, it's too late for investors to cash in.
But with peHUB urging investors to take a look, processors, compounders and material suppliers can expect to see more interest from venture capitalists.
What color is "Giggle"? Or, for that matter, Bluff, Sharkskin, Joker, Orinoco or Cayman?
I get a kick out of the new colors that designers create, and the names and desriptions they attach to them.
Here's a list that came today from Bayer MaterialScience LLC. Check out the names and descriptions, and see if you can match them up with the photo below. I'll post the cutline for the photo in the blog comments section, so you can see how you did:
Bluff - This velvety, pinkish-tan hue provides depth and richness to auto interiors. The Bayblend LGX300 polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (PC/ABS) blend plastic used with this color is a low-gloss resin that draws in automotive designers with its high-end appearance.
Sharkskin - Bathed in silvery-gray, this is a cool, sleek and modern shade. Auto interiors will appear streamlined and smooth when draped in this hue. For this color, OEMs also turn to Bayblend LGX300 PC/ABS blend plastic for its good mar and scratch resistance qualities.
Joker - Take a splash of whimsy and add in a pinch of mischief, and you have Joker: a playful purple created in flame retarded Bayblend PC/ABS blend plastic for electronic device housings which are often used in homes and offices.
Orinoco - This moody green color takes you right to the depths of the jungle. Developed in flame retarded Bayblend PC/ABS blend plastic, this verdant shade complements interiors and is following the latest fashion trends for the housings of electrical and electronic devices.
Cayman - A deep blue, the shade of the warm waters of a spring break spent in the Caribbean. This bright, chromatic shade of azure will be a pleasant addition to many consumer products. Makrolon 2405 polycarbonate plastic, which is often used in consumer products, is the "workhorse" of plastic resins - a higher performing material that includes improved flowability for increased design flexibility.
Giggle - Like the soda bubbles that tickle your nose, this lighthearted orange hue will tickle any designer's fancy. This shade was also designed in Makrolon® 2405 polycarbonate plastic resin, which features a broad processing window that permits faster cycling and higher productivity.
Giggle, et al, are part of a new crop of spring offerings from the color experts at BMS, who come up with new products every year to stay on top of design trends.
John Skabardonis, polycarbonates marketing manager for North America, said BMS works closely with designers, and in fact most of the new colors were named at contests held a few weeks ago at the Industrial Designers Society of America's district conferences.
The winners were: David Thimm (Sharkskin); Faith Gagliardi, Wentworth Institute of Technology (Joker); David Randle (Cayman); and Christian LaPointe, New Jersey Institute of Technology (Giggle).
CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta will air an hour-long investigative story that will focus on PVC manufacturing plants and the communities that surround them on June 2 at 8 p.m. EST.
The report, according to anti-PVC activist group the Center for Health, Environment and Justice, will look into "the environmental health and justice problems plaguing the community of Mossville, Louisiana. Nestled amidst an alarming cluster of chemical plants, Mossville is home to more PVC chemical plants than anywhere else in the entire country, and has been dubbed the Vinyl Manufacturing Capital of America."
CHEJ is urging its supporters to watch the show, and to use it to draw attention to its PVC-Free campaign in schools and elsewhere.
Frito-Lay North America Inc. is spending a lot of money and effort to let the public know that its SunChips snack chip bags are "fully compostable." But one community decided this week that the bags may not be quite compostable enough.
The Regional Municipality of Niagara, Ontario, announced May 18 that it will not accept the bags in its Green Bin program because the film takes too long to degrade in the community's composting plant.
"The Sun Chips bags are made of polylactic acid, which is a corn starch-based product similar to that which is used in the compostable liner bags that are accepted in the Region's organics program. Both products compost under the right conditions, however, the Sun Chips bags have three layers of and compost in about 14 weeks, while the bin liner bags are a single layer and break down in three to four weeks," Andrew Pollock, director of waste management services, said in a news release.
"The Walkers' Gore Composting Facility, which processes the Region's Green Bin material, produces compost in eight weeks. As such, the Sun Chips bag may not fully break down in the composting process. Bags that do not fully break down would be screened out and landfilled.
"Walkers and the Region are currently conducting a controlled test to determine if the bags will break down in the eight-week Gore composting process. Once this test is completed, staff will determine if the Sun Chips bag can be accepted in Niagara's Green Bin program. Currently, only compostable bags carrying the Biodegradable Products Institute logo are the only compostable plastic item accepted in the Region's Green Bin program. In the meantime, the Niagara Region is reminding residents to continue to place all chip bags, including Sun Chip bags, in the garbage."
Frito-Lay has gotten quite a bit of positive press for its SunChips packaging, which the snack giant called the world's first 100 percent compostable chip bag.
If this community sticks with this decision, it's likely to go down as another case that will confuse consumers in the ongoing debate about the merits of packaging degradability.
When Plastics News writes about sustainability, we naturally tend to focus on materials-related issues, and most frequently about packaging.
Carbon footprint plays a role, too, as well as energy savings, either from the reduced transportation costs that lightweight plastics bring to the table, or insulating properties of plastic building products.
The item, "Sustainability Faceoff: Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo," does look at packaging, but that's just the beginning. How about issues like:
Where does the company source its sweetener?
How is its worker safety record? Do employees participate in wellness programs?
Do workers own a share of the company? How much does the CEO earn compared with the worker bees?
Does the company buy products from minority-owned and women-owned suppliers?
And the bottom line -- that's important to having a sustainable business, too. How profitable is the company?
It's interesting to see this big-picture approach. I expect most plastics companies will continue to have their customers like Wal-Mart or Procter & Gamble define what's sustainable -- but there's a lot more to the equation than a typical packaging scorecard.
What do taxes on plastic bags accomplish? Not much, according to the Tax Foundation, a non-profit Washington think tank.
According to the group, supporters exaggerate the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, landfill deposits and litter that bag taxes will accomplish. On top of that, the revenue that bag taxes generate for states and municipalities has been disappointing.
"Even when pitched more honestly as taxes, they are likely to fall short of ambitious environmental clean-up goals. Also, bag taxes cause unintended effects, such as stimulating bulk purchases of plastic bags, perhaps of a type that would cause equal environmental damage. And bag taxes invariably get caught up in the political process in which special interests in business and government are served more than the public's interest," the group said in a report released today.
"Whether assessed theoretically or practically, bag taxes are not a promising development in tax policy."
The Tax Foundation said bag taxes, in theory, should fall into the category of pigouvian taxes -- named for British economist Arthur Pigou -- which are set to depress purchase of a product in order to benefit society.
"Government-imposed charges for bags are best described as pigouvian taxes, though it is not clear how much environmental benefit the citizens will receive if fewer bags are used. The tendency, as in Seattle, is for public officials to greatly exaggerate environmental benefits. And with the likelihood of inter-governmental transfers, bag taxes may just be another way for a state or city to grab general revenue."
Nevertheless, don't expect to see the bag tax trend go away. While mainstream environmental groups are spending more time on global warming, there are too many grassroots groups calling for bans and taxes on plastic bags than you can count -- and new efforts seemingly popping up every week. (Here's one in Austin, Texas).
Richard Stein, a professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, penned an eloquent defense of plastics, which was published today on the Web site of The Valley Advocate in Northhampton, Mass.
I read your article on alternatives to plastics ("Back to Basics," May 6, 2010) with interest. I agree that there are problems with the use of plastics, but like with so many other things in life, plastics have their positive and negative aspects, and one should balance these in making decisions.
Modern electronics are possible because of the use of plastics in constructing circuit cards. While this has given rise to some problems, would we be willing to give up television or Internet? When I was young, milk bottles were made from glass, but such bottles have mostly disappeared because of the advantages provided by plastics in weight savings (leading to less fuel for washing and delivery) and less harm resulting from cuts occurring with breakage (which caused a serious injury to our milkman). Also, it takes much energy to make and recycle glass.
I have a letter from the former Director of Bell Labs commenting on the great economic savings and environmental gain in replacing lead-sheathed phone cables with plastic ones. I recently had a colonoscopy and I am thankful that it was possible to use a flexible plastic catheter for this rather than a rigid glass tube. There is concern about conventional plastics requiring petroleum for manufacture, but this process uses less than 5 percent of the petroleum supply while about 90 percent is used for fuel. The saving of fuel resulting from the weight saved by using plastics as a substitute for metal in vehicles and aircraft more than compensates for the petroleum needed to make the plastics. I do not think it desirable to use degradable plastic since the energy content of the plastics is lost upon degradation.
There is rightful concern about health damage arising from trace material leaching out of plastic used for food containers and bottles. One example is phthalates. I was involved, about 60 years ago, in the introduction of phthalates, which permitted the use of plastic film to avoid water damage to rifles during Pacific landings in World War II. I suspect the lives saved by this were many. My point is that plastics have their place and can help our lives, but they must be used properly.
As one of the founders of the world-renowned polymer program at UMass-Amherst, I became concerned with environmental problems arising from improper disposal. I helped produce a documentary video about this, Troubled Waters, which showed on more than 100 Public Broadcasting System TV stations. It advocated proper disposal procedures, some of which have been adopted (such as recycling soda bottles), without which the problems would be much worse.
It would not be beneficial to go back to glass for food containers, but it is essential that there be education and regulations to assure that [plastic containers] are used properly. We must educate our legislators to do this.
My plea in general is not to encourage an attitude of technology versus the environment. We must learn how to use technology properly to help the environment. As an example, the use of plastic membranes for reverse osmosis can replace boiling as a means for concentrating maple sap for syrup. The same can be used for desalinating seawater to produce fresh water, which is becoming increasingly scarce. This is already being used in regions such as Cape Hatteras and the Near East and on cruise ships, and will be more widely used when technology can reduce costs sufficiently.
It's rare to see such a thorough, balanced and thoughtful response to a news column on plastics.
Business is great at Kepner Plastics Fabricators Inc., a Torrance, Calif., company that makes booms that help to contain oil spills.
The company's Meryl Lee told Rob Schmitz of American Public Media's "Marketplace" program that Keper is "ordering lots of extra materials and talking about putting a second shift on."
Schmitz: So business is good?
LEE: Business is booming. I'm sorry, I had to say that.
Get it? The company makes oil spill containment booms.
Kepner Plastics also makes custom plastic fabrications and a variety of specialized products including inflatables, covers and liners, and water control products.
The company got into the oil containment market in 1968, when the Ocean Eagle tanker grounded in the entrance to San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico and broke-up, spilling 83,400 barrels of crude oil.
According to the company's web site, "Several containment methods were tried and failed before Kepner was called upon to create a containment solution to control the oil spill. In response, Kepner designed at its home office in Torrance, California and completed manufacture in a warehouse in Puerto Rico, the first "SeaCurtain" oil spill containment boom. The only conditions of that contract were, 'If it works, we'll pay you.' It worked, and they did!"
The Plastiki isn't just raising awareness of marine debris, it's also helping to publicize, and commercialize, a new composite sheet made out of recycled PET.
The Plastiki -- the boat made out of PET soda bottles that David de Rothschild is sailing from San Francisco to Australia -- managed to get a plug today for the composite sheet product.
Blogger Sindya N. Bhanoo writes that "after 38 continuous days at sea, the crew anchored at Christmas Island on April 27 for a few days' rest before the next leg, a 20- to 30-day voyage to Fiji." While the crew is in port, he traded emails with skipper Jo Royle, and put together a Q&A interview for the blog.
The plug? It comes in Royle's answer to this question: "Did you have any harrowing moments in those 38 days sailing the Pacific?"
We have arrived after sailing for nearly 40 days across some of the most remote ocean in the world with no visual fatigue in the super structure of the Plastiki. This is a great achievement for the project and proves that Seretex -- a fully recyclable self reinforced PET [polyethylene terephthalate] -- is a smart material to replace the use of more toxic and less recyclable plastics used to manufacture anything from garden furniture to bus stops to the interior of cars. The Plastiki is the first product to be built from Seretex.
Seretex didn't ring a bell with me, so I did some checking.
This web site describes it as Seretex srPET, short for self reinforced PET, "a revolutionary product that will change the way we build composite structures. This replacement for typical fiberglass/epoxy products is much safer and easier to work with. It can be made from 100% recycled content and can then be recycled again at the end of it's life. Your next tennis racket or pair of skis might be derived from drink bottles and when you are done with them recycled again into a jacket or sweater. This is the future, be part of it."
This earlier Plastics Blog post included a video that featured the Seretex material, although the story doesn't mention the material by name. The material is created by taking a polyester fabric made from recycled PET, applying heat and pressure, to create a rigid board.
I'm sure we'll hear more about Seretex after the Plastiki completes its voyage to Australia. Interesting that SmarterPlanet LLC is apparently using this eco-focused voyage to prove the durability of a recycled-content product.
Here's a nice headline for plastics packaging makers: "Marks & Spencer's mini wine range goes a shade greener with plastic bottles."
The story comes from British national daily The Guardian, in a report about U.K. retailer Marks & Spencer converting "its entire range of 25cl still wine bottles from glass to environmentally friendly plastic, meeting growing consumer demand for lighter and 'unbreakable' containers."
More from the story:
The new bottles are 88% lighter than glass bottles, less energy is required to manufacture a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle than a glass bottle and the lightweight bottle reduces distribution emissions. The company estimates that the switch will save it 525 tonnes of packaging a year.
Marks & Spencer has already converted its standard-sized 750ml wine bottles to plastic. But the story points out that the mini-bottles are popular on picnics. The retailer sells about 100,000 mini bottles a week, and sales are up 26 percent over the same period a year ago.
Check out the interview below. The anchors are poorly prepared. If they have a list of questions, you can't tell. They don't appear to be paying attention to what Davies is saying -- they're both reading their laptops while he talks, and then ask questions that barely make any sense when he pauses.
Davies does a nice job staying on point, especially given the circumstances. He's prepared, even though the reporters are not. He really holds together the 5-minute segment, unless you're interested in whether one of the Fox reporters can eat plant-based tableware, or if the other will get a free pair of shoes after the interview is finished.
I think most TV reporters do a good job. They handle many stories each day on a wide variety of topics, often covering issues and companies where they don't have a lot of expertise. That said, this report is disappointing.
I don't bring this up to slam these reporters. I'm not sure if the poor interview is their fault, or their producers', or the result of a technical problem.
But since I often counsel Plastics Blog readers that they should get their message out, including by doing interviews with journalists, this is an example of how an interview could go wrong if you don't prepare in advance.
This interview easily could have degenerated into a story that left viewers with the impression that all plastics, including bioplastics, are toxic. Davies is able to gently deal with that misconception and guide the reporters back to the point of the story, without getting into an argument.
The Wall Street Journal featured three start-up companies with plastics connections over the weekend: e-book company Plastic Logic, recycler TerraCycle Inc., and plastic wine closure maker Nomacorc LLC.
The trifecta features the companies in different sections -- there's no connection between the stories, just a coincidence that all three have significant plastics connections.
The Plastics Logic story is in the Journal's Technology section. The story, "First Plastic E-reader Was Fruit of Cambridge Spinoff's Labors," highlights how it took five years for the company to commercialize its plastic-circuit technology, which makes possible the company's Que Pro Reader -- the first e-reader made of plastic electronics.
The story notes that TerraCycle is in a critical stage right now. "The company's warehouses are jammed with about one billion wrappers and other garbage for which it had no big customers," the story notes, so the company "desperately needs more orders." The company is trying to ink some deals right now with big retailers like Wal-Mart.
Finally, the paper's Food & Drink section has a nice feature on Nomacorc, the Zebulon, N.C., company that's carved out a niche making plastic stoppers that compete with cork. According to the story, the company produced 1.4 billion plastic "corks" last year, and plastic stoppers now account for about 20 percent of the market. (Natural cork accounts for 69 percent, and screw caps account for 11 percent.)
The company has succeeded by applying plastics technology to the stopper market. Early plastic corks were made of solid plastic that were "difficult to insert and extract and can leave gaps around the edges that are prone to leaks." But Nomacorc succeed by making corks using two types of extruded plastics:
A firm inner core that would hold the shape of the cork and a spongy exterior that would fit better. The new corks had the feel of natural cork and were easier to remove with a cork screw, which addressed a key consumer objection. Not only that, but they could be printed to look like cork or made in fanciful colors. Nomacorc holds 30 patents on its products and the techniques to make them.
Interesting that these companies are all featured on the online.wsj.com site today. Beyond the obvious plastics connection, perhaps these stories, and these companies, do share something else in common -- the business truism that it takes time and money for new companies to get established, even when they have an innovation that seems like an obvious winner.
The Chinaplas trade show now appears to be the No. 2 global plastics trade show, measured by attendance, surpassing North America's NPE show. And that's despite volcano-related travel disruptions, which held down attendance from Europe.
Attendance at the Chinaplas 2010 trade show, held April 19-22 in Shanghai, reached 81,435, a 17.5 percent jump from last year's 69,300, according to show organizer Adsale Exhibition Services Ltd.
That's despite a 2 percent drop in attendance from Europe, which Adsale said might have been the result of the volcano eruption in Iceland that grounded most flights from Europe in the days leading up to the show.
The news that Chinaplas has apparently surpassed NPE, in terms of attendance, isn't a big surprise. Attendance at the last NPE, held in 2009 in Chicago, was down sharply (most exhibitors still felt it was a strong show, given the global economic recession). The show's organizer, the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc., estimated total registrations at 44,000, down about 28 percent compared to 64,451 three years ago.
Comparing attendance at trade shows is an inexact science to be sure. SPI counted total registrations last year, rather than actual bodies -- and there's no way of knowing how many of the 44,000 actually came to Chicago. Chinaplas uses a barcode system to count visitors, so the attendance figure is a total of daily unique visitors to the show ... and Adsale said it does not include exhibitors.
Still, if you've ever been to a show, and you see things like badge-sharing, you know attendance figures aren't precise.
The K trade shows, held every three years in Germany, are still apparently No. 1 in terms of attendance. K 2007 show drew about 242,000 visitors to Messe Düsseldorf -- although, again, precise comparisons with NPE and Chinaplas are difficult, because the organizers all count visitors differently.
It is amazing that Chinaplas saw such attendance growth this year despite obviously losing a chunk of people who simply couldn't get there. But China's plastics industry is in recovery mode since the recession, and this year's show benefited from strong attendance from the again-booming domestic market.
Of the total 81,435 attendees, 18 percent, or 14,701, came from outside China.
Chinaplas has the good fortune this year of being on the wave of economic recovery. NPE had the misfortune in 2009 of bad timing, with the severe financial meltdown, a major recession and the labeling of the United States an "epidemic zone" for the H1N1 virus, which might have held down attendance from Asia.
It will be interesting to see what sort of attendance NPE will get in 2012, when the show moves from Chicago to Orlando, Fla.
Is attendance important? Certainly there's some prestige here, for Chinaplas to take the No. 2 spot from NPE.
But all three are strong shows, and all three are important for any company with a goal of being an important player in the global plastics market.
On top of that, K, NPE and Chinaplas are very different shows, and exhibitors tailor their products and message for the unique sort of visitors that attend.
So let's consider the attendance figures for Chinaplas good news for the recovery of the global plastics industry -- a sign that business is continuing to improve.
And the numbers also reinforce the message that trade shows around the world, which bring processors and suppliers together for face-to-face meetings, remain relevant -- even when mother nature does its best to throw roadblocks in the way.
Last week Sarah Newman posted an item on The Huffington Post about "anti-plastic heroes" -- a list of 10 "artists, activists, politicians and even corporations who are offering inspiring ways to cut plastic consumption."
Newman charges that plastics are "suffocating our planet," and that "we are smothering our planet in plastic waste." Some of the "Ten Anti-Plastics Heroes" have been featured before in The Plastics Blog -- the No. 1 hero, for example, is Beth Terry of Fake Plastic Fish.
For her part, Terry says she's not anti-plastic:
I'm pro-living beings. Plastic is not destroying the Earth. The Earth will be around long after we and all the other living creatures have ceased to exist. And the plastic will have become just another geological layer. But the creatures on the Earth now... we are all suffering because of the misuse of the materials available to us, and that's why I do my work.
Misuse of materials -- that's an interesting take on the problem, and perhaps a common ground where environmentalists both inside and outside the plastics industry can establish a dialogue.
I saw Newman's and Terry's Earth Day-related posts last week, but was inspired to revisit them after seeing a recent post, and some comments, on the Society of the Plastics Industry's Inc.'s "In the Hopper" blog.
The post, "Earth Day and Plastics," highlighted numerous ways that plastic contribute to a more sustainable world.
That's about as far from Newman's post as you can get.
SPI's Barry Eisenberg made a convincing case that plastics help to enable many environmental innovations -- like windmills, solar cells, and more efficient aircraft and automobiles.
But is that missing the point? Critics of plastics (at least most of them) don't dispute that plastics offer benefits to society.
Beth Terry posted a comment in response that said in part:
While I sincerely appreciate that plastics have made many of our advanced technologies possible, I cannot fail to notice that the article omits some of the most troubling forms of plastic -- those which are opposed by me and members of the Plastic Pollution Coalition: Single Use Disposable Plastics as well as plastics used to contain food and beverages.
Single use disposables are the biggest form of litter polluting the planet and are almost completely unnecessary. Bringing our own reusable bags, bottles, and containers with us helps cut this unnecessary source of pollution, as do bans and fees on disposable bags and other containers.
Plastic food containers, whether disposable or durable, can be hazardous to our health. We all know that plastics can leach the chemicals added to them, especially when subject to heat and rough handling. But how many of us actually know what those chemicals are? Phthalates, BPA, lead, antimicrobials are just some of the chemicals that can leach from certain plastics. But as you know, there are a whole host of chemicals added to affect plastic's qualities, and manufacturers are not required to disclose any of them.
U.S. law requires labeling of all ingredients on food products. Unfortunately, the chemicals that can leach from the plastic containers are not included in those ingredient lists. So how can consumers truly make informed decisions? Are your members willing to disclose the "recipes" for their products, or will they forever hide behind claims of proprietary information?
It's fine to be proud of your contributions to sustainability, but how about also addressing the ways in which plastics play a part in polluting the planet?
Eisenberg responded with a defense of plastics, to be sure, but he acknowledged that "industry needs to do more."
For decades, our industry has been a leader in finding innovative solutions to a variety of societal problems. Currently, overall sustainability and developing products with an enhanced environmental profile are targets squarely in our crosshairs. We agree that we absolutely must drive waste from the packaging value chain. Frankly, initiatives to cut plastic waste not only yield improved sustainability but are also cost-effective for companies. The packaging industry has been focused on reducing the amount of packaging necessary for a long time. But certainly industry needs to do more. Innovative solutions that augment physical recycling - including waste-to-energy and biobased/biodegradable materials -- are becoming more prevalent....
Beth, we appreciated your recent Earth Day blog post. Particularly when you wrote, "We are all suffering because of the misuse of the materials." We couldn't agree more.
Manufacturers of single-use plastics have their own take on product sustainability. As Eisenberg mentions, they point to benefits of plastic packaging including energy and material savings.
Newman, Terry and Eisenberg didn't settle the pro-plastics vs. anti-plastics debate on Earth Day 2010. But at least Terry and Eisenberg found a little bit of common ground.
I don't think it will be enough that Newman won't be updating her "anti-plastic heroes" list on Earth Day 2011, though.
The company packages its Plum Organics brand in what Adweek describes as "micro-thin [plastic] container that's devoid of Bisphenol A."
Competing baby food brands in glass jars use nine times as much fossil fuel to transport and take up to 14 times the amount of landfill space. By contrast, Plum's disposable pouch is eco-friendly, competitively priced and convenient to use. So, what's the problem?
It's plastic. And in the minds of most consumers, that's not "green." Sure, Plum could try to explain statistics about landfill space and weight-transport/carbon-usage ratings, but that's a lot to cram onto a 4.2-ounce bag. "These things are hard to talk about," Grimmer says. "There's nothing sexy about a landfill."
The story points out that frequently plastic packaging is "a lot more ecologically friendly" than alternative materials, but marketers are faced with a difficult task -- explaining the advantages of plastics to consumers -- including some who have preconceived notions that plastics = bad for the environment.
Visit your local supermarket and you'll see hundreds of products purporting to be eco-friendly. But without a third-party monitor, a twisted dynamic emerges: Much of what consumers assume is green is actually not, and those brands that really are green are often left to make a complex and technical pitch that people don't understand or just don't hear. As eco-marketing consultant Jacqueline Ottman puts it, "The consumer is very confused about what's truly green and what isn't. Marketers are confused themselves. Some products can be green in one instance and not in another. So it's all potentially confusing."
Sure, companies like Nest Collective could spend their marketing dollars convincing customers that their plastic packaging is sustainable. But why should they?
That's a message that's the responsibility of the plastics industry -- both the materials suppliers and the processors/converters that make the packaging.
David Ropeik, author of the "How Risky Is It, Really?" blog on Psychology Today's Web site, has an interesting post yesterday about bisphenol A safety.
The post, "Bisphenol A. Balancing Fact and Fear as We Face a Risk," notes that uncertainty, plus some common concerns about the safety of chemicals and the trustworthiness of the chemical industry, make this an issue where the public is naturally worried.
"BpA is a CHEMICAL, and just because it's in that category it rings alarm bells. It's a product of the less-than-trusted chemical industry, another category that automatically triggers concern," Ropeik writes.
"BpA is human-made, and that makes a risk scarier than if it's natural. (Soy is powerfully estrogenic too. Nobody's demanding that the FDA regulate that!) The risk of BpA, if there is one, is imposed on you via food containers. It's not something you choose, and an imposed risk always evokes more worry than if it's voluntary. BpA is undetectable by our senses, which makes it harder to do anything about, and the less control we feel we have about a risk, the more afraid we usually are. And the science of BpA is uncertain. The fewer facts we have about a risk, the scarier it usually is."
Ropeik cautions against banning BPA until manufacturers have time to develop, test and convert to alternative materials.
If we rush to ban BpA, for example, will its replacements produce their own dangers? (We replaced carcinogenic solvents in the electronics industry with chlorofluorocarbons that turned out to destroy stratospheric ozone, which protects us from cancerous rays from the sun. D'Oh!) If we rush to ban BpA from containers of baby foods, can the infant formula industry convert to other ways besides cans to provide all the liquid formula moms need? Not without a lot of time to make that conversion (which some companies are working on already, foreseeing such a ban).
I think Ropeik is being a little simplistic with that last point. BPA safety has been an issue in some circles for more than a decade. But progress on creating alternative materials didn't accelerate until public concern grew and regulators and legislators started to take a closer look at the issue.
So if alternatives are needed, what incentives do manufacturers have to create them unless the public demands them in the first place?
Nonetheless, this is an interesting post from an unlikely source, and I'm sure we'll be hearing more from Ropeik in the future.
I've previously blogged about the journalism awards that the Milwaukee Journal Sentinelhas received for its coverage of bisphenol A safety. Today Fast Company magazine joins the parade, with a first place award from the Association of Health Care Journalists' annual awards for excellence.
The major contribution this story made to the BPA debate was its effort to show the similarities between the chemical industry's defense of BPA safety and the tobacco industry's earlier efforts to discredit research on tobacco dangers. Case's report noted that some of the same organizations that chemical makers are using now were once key players in the tobacco industry's effort.
Our trust in science was shaken after reading Fast Company's investigation of BPA. The writer, David Case, makes a compelling argument that commercial interests - in this case plastic manufacturers - distort science and manufacture doubt in order to keep their products on the market. With its detailed revelations, the piece ultimately shows us how all industry can try to co-op science to serve a profit-making agenda. And our government, sadly, may be more complicit than we know. Excellent reporting, good storytelling, and some truly brilliant sidebars add up to a winning entry.
TV Week has a report about the AHCJ awards, which notes that Case said he first started reporting on BPA a decade ago.
He pitched the story "many times to editors over the years, but it wasn't ripe yet."
So he took his box of notes and cassette tapes with him on every move -- to San Francisco, Washington, Philadelphia and New York, each time debating whether to toss it. In mid-2008, his diligence paid off with an assignment, but it took another nine months to pull it together.
"The story involves several very determined groups of people trying to keep BPA on the market, one of the biggest industrial chemicals out there," said Case of the challenges. The other, he said, was making sure everyone understood the science.
As I've pointed out in the past, it's worth keeping track of which plastics-related stories win big journalism awards. Those issues tend to stay in the public and legislative spotlight for a long time.
New York newspapers like the idea of boosting the city's plastics recycling efforts.
PlasticsNews.com reported last week on the proposal, dubbed Local Law 19, ("NYC may accept all rigid plastics for recycling"). The proposal would be the first significant expansion to recycling in the city since the program was introduced in 1989.
Under the proposals, the city will open a new recycling facility in Brooklyn capable of accepting all rigid plastics, not just the PET and high density polyethylene containers currently accepted. In addition, access to recycling bins in public spaces will double in the next three years, and city-wide textile recycling and household hazardous waste collection programs will be offered.
Today two leading publications in New York editorialized on behalf of the plan.
The record of recycling in New York City has not been particularly impressive. Before 1989, when curbside recycling was mandated, it was left to scrappy entrepreneurs and environmentalists to collect bottles and newspapers. The new municipal program represented a leap forward, but it was surpassed long ago by other cities' efforts. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's ill-fated suspension of the recycling effort in 2002 in order to pare the budget broke the program's momentum and ultimately cost more than it saved.
New Yorkers eventually returned to the habit of recycling, but we still aren't very good at it. Our mentality, after decades of unlimited trash collection, is that government should haul off whatever is plopped on the curb, no questions asked. ...
Now the good news. The City Council has come up with a belated but welcome solution: All rigid plastics shall be recycled. Give us your tired, your poor, your Chinese takeout containers! Old socks, too. They and other unwanted clothes can be dropped into special bins to be installed citywide--a promising way to capture recyclable textiles, which make up 10% of the waste stream.
Legislation has been introduced and is expected to pass next month. We urge Mr. Bloomberg to sign it into law without too much tinkering.
Adding materials to the city's recycling load won't increase collection costs, because recycling trucks are now returning from their routes half-empty. Meanwhile, trucks collecting regular garbage will have less to pick up, so the Department of Sanitation could wring some savings out of that. But the real economic and environmental benefits will come from diverting more plastic and clothing from landfills to the recycling market. That's the kind of trash talk all New Yorkers want to hear.
The New York Daily News also editorialized in favor of adding more plastics to the city's recycling effort. The column, "Just one word: Plastics: Plan to simplify recycling sounds like a good idea," laments that "Trash recycling is one of the overbearing hassles of life in New York City: You can do plastic bottles or jugs that have a 1 or a 2 on the bottom, as long as the mouth isn't wider than the bottom. Got that? And remember, no yogurt containers!"
City Council Speaker Christine Quinn says she has a better way. Pretty much all household plastic can be recycled, Quinn says, and it can be done economically. She contends that recycling it would cost the city less than shipping it out to landfills with the waste.
The Sanitation Department says it will have to examine Quinn's proposals to see if the economies hold up. If we can recycle more while spending - and hassling - less, that's great. If not, toss the idea with the trash.
Here's hoping New York can achieve a cost-effective recycling plan that can significantly boost the volume of material that residents can recycle.
The plastics industry has long made the case that most (if not all...) plastics are recyclable. Here's an opportunity to prove it. Let's not drop the ball.
Stephen Joseph, plastic bag advocate and environmentalist
Patty Fisher of the San Jose Mercury News has discovered that Stephen Joseph, counsel for the Save the Plastic Bag Coalition and SaveThePlasticBag.com, is a quotable character.
Fisher writes in her column, "The environmentalist who wants to save the plastic bag," that she called Joseph to get "the other side" in a column that she planned to write "trumpeting the joys of life without plastic."
But the column took on a new spin after she talked to Joseph.
She discovered that Joseph seriously considers himself an environmentalist. (As I've written before, many people in the plastics industry feel that way about themselves, although that's sometimes hard for outsiders to believe.)
The difference with Joseph is that he has a platform, with the Save the Plastics Bag group, and he can come off as refreshingly convincing.
"When I was first approached by the plastic bag manufacturers, I thought it was a joke," he told Fisher.
But he felt that there were virtues to plastic bags -- yes, even environmental-related virtues, having to do with energy savings.
Joseph felt the answer to plastic-bag related litter and marine debris problems was a massive recycling campaign.
"But the environs stopped us," he told Fisher. "They didn't want to recycle them, they wanted to ban them altogether. There was this religion about it. It didn't matter what you said, they wouldn't listen."
Joseph is a quotable character, eh? We discovered that a few years ago, when Plastics News staff reporter Mike Verespej started to talk to Joseph about a plastic bag recycling project called Stripes2Stripes.
"I have never gotten involved in an industry so lacking in leadership as this one," Joseph told us at the time. "This industry has gotten so used to not being represented by a competent trade organization that it has hypnotized itself and convinced itself it is doing the right thing."
He added: "This industry needs to be better organized, fight for what it believes in, and address the problems instead of saying that it is the environmental activist's fault. But they would rather just do public relations and feel good exercises."
Joseph is up to his neck in being involved now. Is his work starting to make a difference?
While he managed to entertain Fisher, the columnist with the Mercury News, it doesn't look like Joseph converted her to side of plastics bag advocates.
Fisher writes in her column, "Joseph may be clever and passionate, but he's on the losing side of this battle. The state is forcing cities to cut down on waste that litters our waterways, and plastic bags make an easy target. Eventually, the state will ban them and we'll all be carting stuff around in reusable bags."
Thanks to Novachem blogger Frank Van Haste, who sent me a link to a post that he wrote about Fisher's column today titled "This is refreshing."
Van Haste writes: "kudos to the Mercury News' Ms. Fisher for her open mindedness and willingness to speak truth rather than parroting the conventional wisdom of the day. She still believes that the days of single-use bags are numbered, but she declines to condemn plastic bags reflexively -- good for her!"
Which is 'greener,' aluminum foil or plastic wrap?
We've often seen studies comparing certain products made from plastic and traditional materials -- like soft drink containers and grocery bags. What about food wrap -- what's the most sustainable choice? The Green Lantern blog from The Washington Post's Web site takes a look at that question today, and plastic ends up with a pretty good report card.
Judging by conversations the Lantern has had with her colleagues, most people seem to believe intuitively that aluminum foil is better for the planet, maybe because plastics are made from fossil fuels and we've heard so much about how they're polluting the oceans. Plus, foil can be rinsed and reused with relative ease, or sometimes even recycled at the curb, while plastic wrap is usually thrown away.
But as we discussed in our analysis of beer containers, aluminum has a heavy manufacturing footprint. It takes a whole lot of energy to mine bauxite ore from the Earth and then process it: Producing a ton of aluminum ingots requires 170 million British thermal units of energy and spits out about 12 tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent.
By comparison, producing a ton of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pellets requires just 17 percent as much energy and generates 12 percent as much greenhouse gas. (Consumer cling wrap used to be made out of polyvinyl chloride, a substance reviled by many environmentalists, but now it's nearly all LDPE or its tougher cousin, linear LDPE.)
For the answer, Rastogi turns to an online tool called Compass from the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, which packaging designers can use to compare the environmental impacts of their products.
When comparing one square foot of aluminum foil and one square foot of LDPE, aluminum "was the loser in nearly all the metrics Compass assesses, including fossil fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, human health impacts, aquatic toxicity and potential for eutrophication."
Using recycled aluminum helps to narrow the gap, as does reusing the aluminum foil.
These results are sure to surprise many Post readers, who likely assume that aluminum is always the environmentally superior choice in packaging.
Some gondoliers in Venice are expressing outrage over a shipbuilder creating fiberglass versions of the city's famous gondolas, according to this story from London's Telegraph.
The story, "Plastic gondola plan provokes anger in Venice," notes that traditionalists are afraid of anything that will make Venice like an amusement park.
"We gondoliers will oppose this in every way possible," said Aldo Reato, head of the Venice Ente Gondola association. "Aside from tradition and city regulations the idea of a fibreglass gondola is impractical because this is not some amusement park, this is Venice."
There's something to be said for tradition, for sure. I wonder how much easier it would be to navigate a lightweight fiberglass gondola, compared to a wood model.
The sceptics at Mother Jones magazine took a look at plastics packaging, recycling and biodegradbility as part of a special report on the environment titled "Waste Not Want Not."
The report isn't brand new, but I just noticed it today thanks to a link from the Surfrider Foundation's Rise Above Plastics blog.
One part of the special report attracted my interest. It is a sidebar headlined "Do Biodegradable Plastics Really Work?," and it quotes Ramani Narayan, a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at Michigan State University and a frequently-quoted expert on topics involving degradability and packaging.
Mother Jones senior editor Dave Gilson asked Narayan six questions:
Just how long does it take for conventional plastics to completely break down?
But broken down plastics are better than litter, right?
What about biodegradable plastics?
Can biodegradable plastics break down in landfills?
How do I avoid fake biodegradable plastics?
So what's the best way to get rid of biodegradable plastic?
Here are some of the highlights.
On biodegradable plastics:
They're pretty neat: Microorganisms can convert biodegradable plastics into water, carbon dioxide, and biomass -- with no nasty chemical leftovers. However, there is a lot of confusion surrounding these ecofriendlier plastics -- some of it intentional. "This word 'biodegradable' has become very attractive to people trying to make quick bucks on it," explains Narayan, who helped develop biodegradable corn-based plastic. Some companies, he says, are making conventional plastic that degrades quickly and then throwing around claims about biodegradability that are unproven or just too good to be true.
What's the best way to get rid of biodegradable plastic?
"The public thinks that biodegradability means 'If I throw it away, it will completely go away,'" says Narayan. "They don't even know what 'going away' means." Real biodegradable plastic should be sent to a commercial composting facility, where it will spend its final days being eaten by microbes. But here's the catch: In 2007, only 42 communities nationwide offered compost collection. (Seventeen were in California.) And though some biodegradable plastics can be recycled, no curbside recycling program will take them. So before you buy biodegradable plastics, make sure you can help them "go away" the right way.
This makes sense, and many experts in plastics and packaging would agree with Narayan.
But it assumes that consumers pay attention to whether a package is recyclable or biodegradable. It assumes that they'll properly dispose of their single-use plastics -- collecting and sorting items based on whether they should ultimately be recycled, composted, or landfilled.
But in the real world, where litter and marine debris are big problems, biodegradable plastics are also going to find their way into the waste stream, the recycling stream, and into the environment.
Since the "best way" to dispose of them isn't an option for most consumers, what does that mean for the future of biodegradable plastics?
Bisphenol A safety is part of an April Fools' joke today being pulled by the staff at OnMilwaukee.com.
The joke is on the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, which has focused on BPA in its "Chemical Fallout" series.
OnMilwaukee.com has noticed the volume of BPA coverage coming from its friends at the Journal Sentinel, so the topic is the focus of attention in its bogus April Fools' story, "Report: Journal Sentinel pages contain Bisphenol-A."
According to the story, an independent lab in Iceland tested the news pages and found trace amounts of BPA.
Some of the snippets:
JS editor Marty Kaiser is quoted saying: "The only thing I can say is that we stand by the reporting in each of the 3,500-plus stories we have published on this topic over the past three years."
When absorbed by the eyes [BPA] can cause readers to believe that dozens and dozens of daily wire stories were instead written by the staff of the newspaper.
Stanley Snuffington, "spokesman" for the pretend Plastic Bottle Manufacturers of America, gleefully notes "This is like Christmas, New Year's and Mardi Gras all rolled into one day. These sanctimonious bastards have been up in our grill for three years and now they're getting a dose of their own medicine."
Brick Bradford, a "spokesman" for the Food and Drug Administration, threw in a comment: "The last time I thought about Iceland, I was listening to a Bjork CD in the '90s. This seems like a pretty legitimate study, but you never know for sure."
All in good fun, right? I didn't laugh out loud, but it is amusing.
Time magazine posted a long special report on its Web site today about environmental toxins, headlined "The Perils of Plastic." The story focuses on government regulation of the chemical industry, with an Earth Day spin.
As scientists get better at detecting the chemicals in our bodies, they're discovering that even tiny quantities of toxins can have a potentially serious impact on our health -- and our children's future. Chemicals like bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates -- key ingredients in modern plastics -- may disrupt the delicate endocrine system, leading to developmental problems. A host of modern ills that have been rising unchecked for a generation -- obesity, diabetes, autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder -- could have chemical connections. "We don't give environmental exposure the attention it deserves," says Dr. Philip Landrigan, director of the Children's Environmental Health Center at New York City's Mount Sinai Medical Center. "But there's an emerging understanding that kids are uniquely susceptible to environmental hazards."
The story then sets up the coming Washington debates about BPA safety and the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Now that health care reform has passed, Congress will have time to focus attention on TSCA and chemical safety. Time magazine is right to frame the debate for its readers and give them the background necessary to understand the issue.
However, the story could have used some more details to help readers understand exactly which materials they're talking about -- rather than painting plastics with a broad brush. And the sub-headline that equates plastics and toxins seems more like something from Greenpeace than from a news magazine.
Washington, DC, collected $149,432.27 in January from its tax on plastic and paper bags, according to the district's Office of Tax and Revenue.
January was the first month of the 5-cent-per-bag tax on plastic and paper carryout bags.
D.C. Councilmember Tommy Wells, who supported the measure, said businesses are handing out 50-80 percent fewer bags as a result of the tax.
"While it's difficult to project the annual results based on just the first month's experience, the report shows that residents are making great strides in reducing disposable bag use," Wells said in a news release on his Web site.
He said the numbers suggest that residents are beating projections in how quickly they start to use fewer dispoable bags. The District's Chief Financial Officer estimated last year that residents use about 270 million disposable bags per year, or 22.5 million bags per month.
The new report suggests that residents used a little less than 3 million disposable bags in January.
That could also mean the CFO's estimate was unrealistically high, or that January was a slow month for retail shopping in Washington. But no matter how you compare the numbers, it's evident that the tax is having an impact.
"I'm thrilled with these initial results," Wells said. "Not only are we reducing the number of disposable bags entering our environment, but we also have new resources flowing to help with the cleanup and restoration of the Anacostia River."
The 7.0-magnitude earthquake that devastated Haiti in January, killing 200,000 people, has left the survivors with a less serious headache, but one that the plastics industry might be able to solve: how to get rid of thousands, if not millions, of used PET bottles that once contained donated drinking water.
"The country has been destroyed and, with so many people needing aid, nobody has thought about what to do with the waste, including the PET containers," Carline Seide-Murphy, president of the Haitian Community Development Project, told Stephen Downer, Plastics News' correspondent in Mexico City, in a recent telephone interview.
HCDP is a New York-based, prize-winning environmental protection organization, comprising principally Haitian expatriates.
Seide-Murphy contacted Plastics News to ask for help in finding a PET recycler willing to collect and process the PET waste.
The Caribbean island's population, she said, has been left with "an overwhelming amount of plastics to throw away and no one seems to know what the do with them [the PET bottles]."
HCDP normally works with a Haitian recycler, but Seide-Murphy said she has not heard whether the local recycler is in a position to continue with the type of service it was giving before the quake.
"I'm waiting for a response on their status... [but] I haven't heard anything yet," she said in an email.
Downer gave Seide-Murphy the name of one PET recycler, with operations in the U.S. and Mexico, and volunteered to pass on any other information.
In 2008 HCDP was awarded the Energy Globe World Award for its efforts to clean up the environment in Port-au-Prince, Haiti's capital.
Haiti's population before the earthquake was 9.7 million, according to the World Bank.
A group of 30 California college students used part of their spring break to clean up the beach in Santa Clara, Calif. -- and advocate a ban on polystyrene foodservice products.
The Santa Cruz Sentinel has a story about the students today. Reporter Romain Fonsegrives wrote that the cleanup was part of something called the Wave of Change Tour 2010, organized by California Public Interest Research Group.
"Students wanted to spend their spring break making a difference," said Coreen Weintraub, statewide oceans campaign coordinator for CalPIRG.
Today the students plan to hold a press conference in Sacramento and meet with legislators to push for three bills: a ban single-use PS take-out containers, and bans on smoking and the use of plastic bags in California state parks and on state beaches.
The group is taking a David vs. Goliath attitude toward the effort.
"There are full-time lobbies from the chemical and plastic industry over there to tell them to keep polluting," said Sean Caroll, an organizer for the research group at UCLA, told the Sentinel.
Purging compound maker Novachem of Bridgeport, Conn., is the latest company to start a blog as a resource for its customers.
The Novachem Blog started posting items in February, with topics including purging tips, plus a wide variety of general observations about polymer processing and the plastics industry.
Frank Van Haste, general manager and partner at Novachem, created the blog "to provide purging insight, discuss purging and relevant issues with those who are faced with purging challenges."
Yesterday the blog featured a simple video critical of plastic water bottles. Today I'll feature a similar message. This time, though, the topic is plastic bags, and the film by director Ramin Bahrani is much more polished.
"Plastic Bag," an 18-minute film, tells the story of a plastic bag (voiced of German director/ actor Werner Herzog) as it goes on a journey that includes a trip to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
The Treehugger.com blog featured the film today, calling it "the best film about a plastic bag you'll ever see."
Annie Leonard, a sustainability proponent known for The Story of Stuff project, has a new video that blasts the bottled water industry, called "The Story of Bottled Water."
The 8-minute video, posted below, tackles a few plastics-related issues. It criticizes the low recycling rate for PET water bottles, the fact that some of communities sell used bottles to overseas recyclers, and that many bottles are "downcycled" rather than used to make new bottles.
Leonard also tosses in a shot directly at the plastic bottle industry, noting that while tap water is usually safe to drink, "In many places public water is polluted, thanks to polluting industries like the plastic bottle industry."
This is a simple video with a powerful anti-plastics message. The industry -- including plastics recyclers -- might quibble with some of the facts. But this is, boiled down to the basic talking points, the argument that critics are making against bottled water.
Federal grants are always interesting -- Sen. William Proxmire made a reputation for himself lampooning them with his "Golden Fleece" awards, and newspaper humorist Dave Barry has enjoyed years of material thanks to federal pork projects.
I can't help it, but that's the first thing I thought of when I read this story from Maine.biz, a Web site for a Portland, Maine-based business newspaper.
The story, "Potato plastics group pushes for R&D support," notes that a group called the Sustainable Bioplastics Council of Maine, made up of manufacturers, agricultural groups, nonprofit organizations and University of Maine researchers, is seeking $1.25 million in federal funds to help commercialize plastics made from potatoes and wood chips.
The groups want to use potato starch to make PLA resin.
The story notes that supporters polled 1,000 businesses in Maine that use plastic, and "more than 90 percent of the respondents says they would use bioplastics if they were available, and two-thirds says they would pay a premium for plastics made from Maine potatoes."
That's an interesting statistic. I wonder how many of those people currently pay a premium for french fries made from Maine potatoes.
Perhaps the good folks in Idaho better get their congressional delegation on the phone, pronto.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has been honored again for its "Chemical Fallout" series, including coverage of bisphenol A safety.
Meg Kissinger and Susanne Rust will receive $10,000 and the Roy W. Howard Award for public service reporting. In a news release announcing the award, the foundation said the Journal Sentinel investigation has "spanned three years and forced federal regulators to reverse opinions and eventually declare bisphenol A ... dangerous to fetuses, infants and children."
This is a repeat win for the duo. Last year, Scripps Howard gave them the Edward J. Meeman award for environmental reporting.
Rust and Kissinger also were finalists for the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting for the series.
As I've pointed out in the past, it's worth keeping track of which plastics-related stories win big journalism awards. Those issues tend to stay in the public and legislative spotlight for a long time.
The Journal Sentinel has devoted a lot of reporting firepower to BPA safety, over a long period of time. The effort has drawn attention to an issue that had been simmering on the regulatory back-burner for more than a decade.
I compare this to the Los Angeles Times "Altered Oceans" project, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2007. Before that, few people had heard about the marine debris problem.
Since then, the plastics industry has had to spend a lot of time dealing with plastic bag bans and taxes, and growth and competition from biodegradable materials.
Chemical catalysts rarely make big news, but today's an exception. In a paper published in Macromolecules, a journal of the American Chemical Society, researchers at IBM and Stanford University said they have discovered a new way to make plastics that can be continuously recycled by substituting organic catalysts for the metal oxide or metal hydroxide catalysts most often used to make the plastics.
The news is generating headlines, in part because the Associated Press and other wire services jumped on it this morning.
Here's a story I've been watching for (and I assume some Plastics Blog readers have been too): Archer Daniels Midland Co. has started production at its starch-based polymer plant in Clinton, Iowa, according to a report in the Clinton Herald.
Jason Nevel's story says that after four years of construction, the plant may begin shipping commercial goods next month. The newspaper quotes plant manager John Morrison, who said test runs have been conducted since December, and the plant will be in full operation this summer.
At full capacity, the plant will produce 50,000 tons of Mirel-brand polymer annually, using ADM's wet corn mill as a feedstock.
"To be part of a new plant that's first-of-its-kind in the world is really a lifetime opportunity for most of us," said Kevin Moore, ADM bio-products general manager.
The plant will make Mirel for Telles, a joint venture between Metabolix and ADM.
Dow Chemical Co. is continuing to support relief efforts in Haiti, which is recovering from a major earthquake on Jan. 12. The Midland, Mich.-based company announced today that it supported a relief mission that took surgeons, medical supplies and clothing to those in need on March 6-7.
Dow "collaborated with several Boston-area hospitals and like-minded companies to bring more than $750,000 in donated medical equipment to those in need -- specifically an anesthesia machine and other specialized surgical equipment -- via a relief flight that took place this weekend from the U.S. to Haiti."
The company said the effort was "one of the single, largest private sector relief efforts" since the Jan. 12 earthquake.
On its return flight to the U.S., the airplane transported more than 40 orphans who have been cleared for adoption by the U.S. State Department.
Since the January quake, Dow has donated $500,000 to the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund, as well as an additional $250,000 through an employee matching gift program to support The United Nations World Food Programme. In addition, nearly 2,000 Dow employees personally contributed more than $320,000 of their own funds to Haiti relief efforts.
Dow also announced that it has agreed to donate $100,000 to Hogar De Cristo, a relief organization in Santiago, Chile, to support relief efforts to those affected by the 8.8-magnitude earthquake that southern Chile on Feb. 27. Another $100,000 is being set aside for future rebuilding as the needs are fully assessed. Dow also is sending provisions from Santiago to Talcahuano to assist 70 employees located near the city.
Tupperware Corp. may have a reputation as being a bit old fashioned -- remember Tupperware parties? But the PBS Nightly Business Report did a story on the Orlando, Fla.-based housewares company that emphasizes Tupperware's emphasis on new products, and its success in global markets.
Jeff Yastine, correspondent for Nightly Business Report, noted that Tupperware "doesn't even try" to compete with cheap food storage containers that consumers can buy at Wal-Mart. Instead, Tupperware invests in research, design and product development, to come up with innovative products.
Chairman and CEO Rick Goings added: "We made this very important decision, oh goodness it had to be 15 years ago, that we weren't going to make commodity products. So technology had to play a part."
He cited an example -- a cheese container that's a big seller in France. The top has a semi-permeable membrane, "very much like Goretex," that allows the container to release moisture.
On the financial side, Goings said Tupperware plans to boost its dividend -- a move sure to be popular with investors.
"You have got these baby boomers who've been so terribly disappointed over this last decade of what's happened in the equity market. We think they're going to be looking for income, fixed income, from companies like us. And if our stock appreciates, then that's just double good for them. So that's the road we're going down," Goings said.
The story notes that M&A activity in northeast Ohio's plastics industry "is resulting in stronger players taking out weak ones in an industry realignment that is driven by the recession, but which some observers say has been needed."
A key source quoted is Bill Ridenour, CEO of Polymer Transaction Advisors Inc., a Newbury, Ohio-based M&A firm that specializes in the plastics industry.
Ridenour told Crain's Cleveland that companies are pursuing M&A strategies to enter new geographical or end-use markets, or to dilute their dependence on "troubled sectors" such as automotive.
A lack of investment by private equity firms and other so-called "financial buyers," who in better times relied on easy credit to make acquisitions, means a friendlier market for traditional strategic buyers.
These are all trends that Frank Esposito, Plastics News' senior reporter who covers the M&A beat, has noted in our stories in recent months. It is interesting that Crain's Cleveland has noticed the trend, and considers it important enough news for Page 1.
The Sea Life Aquarium at the Legoland Resort in Carlsbad, Calif., has a new exhibit aimed at raising children's awareness of plastic marine debris.
The project is called "Beach Trash, A Whale of a Problem." First grade classes from a local elementary school worked with environmental artist Teresa Espaniola to turn create a life-sized gray whale mosaic -- all made from plastic trash that the collected on the beach.
Megan Malaska, education specialist for the Aquarium, calls it "a life-changing project for these children. I have no doubt they will be life-long stewards of the ocean."
Hats off to the aquarium for raising awareness of this problem, starting with its young audience. Educating the public about marine debris is a key step in fixing this problem.
Pretty soon, you won't be using paper money in Canada.
Bank of Canada announced yesterday that starting in 2011, it will begin to issue a new series of bank notes printed on a polymer material.
The new notes will incorporate security features that will "significantly increase their protection against counterfeiting." In addition, the plastic notes will last longer than the cotton paper currently in use, "resulting in lower overall production costs and reduced environmental impact."
Other countries have been using polymer banknotes for years, including Australia and New Zealand.
One city wants to educate its citizens, not ban plastics
Here's a radical idea: a sustainability committee in one California city, concerned about litter and marine debris issues, wants to start a "massive public education" program instead of banning products like plastic bags.
Commission Chair Kirstin Cattell told the Daily Tribune's Adam Jensen that the board wants to make a positive impact on the environment.
The panel decided to stress education after also considering two more onerous options: putting a fee on disposable plastic containers, or banning the products.
South Lake Tahoe is aware of the potential legal hurdles of those alternative paths, so it decided to try education instead.
The commission plans to meet March 17 to get public input on the plan.
It will be interesting to see how education works, and whether recycling plays a role.
Recyclers definitely can use more material -- that message came through loud and clear at the Plastics Recycling 2010 conference in Austin, Texas, that I attended.
I hadn't really thought of it this way before, but product bans could be a big problem for recyclers -- they need more material, not less.
Recyclers should play a more vocal role in opposition to product bans. That could raise public awareness of the fact that these products that many people want to ban are, in fact recyclable, and there's a pretty good market for them right now, in North America.
I love a good sports technology story, and The Wall Street Journal has a winner today with a look at the high-tech materials used at the Vancouver Winter Olympics.
The story, headlined "The Olympics of Engineering: From Heart Monitors to Translucent Fabric, the Winter Games Often Come Down to Who Has Better Gear," notes that "With hundredths of a second deciding who wins many events, a tiny tweak to a sled runner or a racing suit can mean the difference between gold and silver, or no medal at all."
Plastics play a key role in many of the products mentioned in the report -- dating back to the 1972 Games, when East Germans first brought plastic luge sleds to compete with other teams' wooden models. (The East Germans dominated.)
Some of the expensive, low-volume plastics sporting goods that first show up in Olympics equipment are bound to find other commerical applications.
The New York Post weighs in today on the bidding for polyolefins giant LyondellBasell Industries AF SCA, with a report saying that Reliance Industries Ltd.'s $14.5 billion bid for the company will fail.
Reporter Josh Kosman wrote that "three Lyondell creditors told the Post that Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani's $14.5 billion bid for Lyondell, the world's third-largest chemical company, is expected to be rejected by a creditor group led by Apollo [Management], setting the stage for Apollo to merge Lyondell with its Hexion Specialty Chemicals operation."
He notes that Reliance's Ambani "still has time to raise his offer, [but] sources doubt he will."
This could be posturing, with LyondellBasell creditors trying to get Reliance to come to the table with its best final offer. Stay tuned, and we'll see if Reliance takes the opportunity to sweeten its bid.
Here's what blogger Christopher Hawthorne had to say about the plastic feature:
The embassy's cubic form will be wrapped on three sides in ETFE -- a transparent polymer and the same flexible material used on the outside of the Water Cube swimming arena for the 2008 Beijing Olympics -- that will not only shade the building but also hold flexible solar panels. (The north side, facing the river, is left uncovered.) The roof, meanwhile, will be covered with an array of solar panels that will hide mechanical equipment while producing electricity.
In a phone interview Monday, KieranTimberlake's James Timberlake said the goal is a building that creates more energy on balance than it uses.
Ultimately, the embassy's success as a piece of architecture will largely depend on how the ETFE scrim operates visually. If the architects can manipulate it to curl or bend dramatically away from the boxy form underneath or to reflect light in novel ways, the building will likely carry a sculptural power to go with its operating efficiency. If not, it may fade into the skyline, resembling a well-tailored but conventional office building.
Like the US Embassy, part of the goal of using the material was environmental -- the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center was seeking a LEED Platinum rating from the U.S. Green Building Council.
PET recycling is getting a lot of media attention today, thanks to Nike's decision to use recycled polyester to make the soccer uniform shirts for all nine Nike-sponsored teams in the 2010 World Cup.
Teams from Brazil, the Netherlands, Portugal, United States, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Serbia and Slovenia all will wear shirts that are each made from up to eight PET bottles.
The news gives a nice bit of public recognition -- all around the globe -- to PET recycling. Check out these stories from London's Daily Mail, and from Fast Company magazine.
And USSoccer.com calls the jerseys the "most environmentally-friendly and technologically-advanced uniform ever produced." (I hope that will translate into an appearance in the championship game).
Does making a few dozen shirts from recycled PET have an impact on the environment? Well, don't forget that many fans will want to buy a replica shirt for their favorite team, and Nike is making those from recycled polyester, too.
According to Fast Company, that means Nike expects to use about 13 million bottles to make jerseys for fans, or about 558,000 pounds of PET.
Here's another one of those posts where you have to click through to see the photos.
The io9 blog has a photo gallery post today titled "Nothing Is Ever Junk When It Can Be Reembodied." It features the work of sculptor Sayaka Ganz,, who created beautiful horses that appear to be emerging from a wall.
When you get close to the sculptures, you realize they are are made entirely from junk plastic, like discarded packaging and foodservice ware.
Ganz had this to say about her work:
I find discarded objects from peoples' houses and give them a second life, a new home. For my sculptures I use plastic utensils, toys and metal pieces among other things. I only select objects that have been used and discarded. The human history behind these objects gives them life in my eyes. My goal is for each object to transcend its origins by being integrated into an animal form that seems alive.
The comments on the blog are also worth a look. So far, at least, there are no attacks on the plastic material -- only praise for the pieces.
Thanks to Plastics News staff reporter Rhoda Miel, for pointing out this item.
Sarah Schmidt, a reporter for the Canwest News Service, took a close look behind Canada's 2008 decision to ban polycarbonate baby bottles, and found that the decision was very controversial.
After looking at more than 5,000 pages of documents from Health Canada covering the two weeks leading up to the announcement, Schmidt wrote that she found "some unease within Health Canada about this precautionary approach to BPA."
The story, "Decision to ban BPA in baby bottles was controversial: Documents," notes that David Butler-Jones, Canada's chief public health officer, initially plannted to offer tips to consumers on how to use baby bottles properly to reduce BPA exposure of infants, and he planned to commit to "exploring options to restrict the amount of bisphenol A found in baby bottles."
But the government changed course and decided to move forward with a ban after a "gruelling five-hour dry run" with top political officials.
This is a very interesting story, but should come as no surprise. I think it's fairly common for government regulators to move slowly on big policy changes like this BPA ban.
The bottom line is that bureaucrats are unlikely to make a drastic switch without support -- or pressure -- from politicial leaders.
While plastics processors have alternatives to polycarbonate that they can use to make baby bottles and sport drink containers, according to the Post report, metal can companies are having problems finding alternatives to epoxy liners.
"Major U.S. foodmakers are quietly investigating how to rid their containers of Bisphenol A," the story says, but the goal is "taking years to reach, costing millions and proving surprisingly elusive."
One person, identified as a source at a major U.S. food company, told Post staff reporter Lyndsey Layton: "We don't have a safe, effective alternative, and that's an unhappy place to be. ... No one wants to talk about that."
Organic food company Eden Foods Inc. managed to get one can supplier to switch from epoxy resin to an oleoresin liner, but that cost about 2.2 cents more per can, and didn't work with acidic foods like canned tomatoes.
For its part, the North American Metal Packaging Alliance stressed that epoxy-lined cans are safe, and they help protect consumers from serious food-borne illnesses.
A year ago, we reported that the economy and environmental pressure were putting pressure on the bottled water sector, and the days of double-digit annual growth was over.
Further proof of the trend comes today with the release of Nestle SA's 2009 financial results. The financial press is reporting that the company's water business is struggling.
But Martin Gelnar, writing for The Wall Street Journal's "The Source" blog, says there's still hope for the sector:
Public opinion may be against Nestle and other bottled water companies, but it is likely that environmental concerns will calm over time.
Potentially more important is the fact that such discussions have little impact in emerging markets, where demand is expected to rise substantially in the next few years.
Meanwhile, bottled water companies are working hard to reduce their environmental impact. Check out our report on the International Bottled Water Association's study of beverage packaging, which found:
The average PET bottled water container weighed about 19 grams in 2000; by 2008, the average amount of PET in each bottle declined to about 13 grams.
During the eight-year period, more than 1.3 billion pounds of PET resin was saved by the bottled-water industry through container lightweighting.
In 2008 alone, the bottled water industry saved 445 million pounds of PET by reducing bottle weights.
Chicago continues to debate how to stop an exodus of trade shows from McCormick Place. This week they got a dose of common sense in a meeting with show organizers.
Exhibitors want lower costs and more flexible work rules so they can do their own booth work.
According to the story, about 30 trade show customers met this week with representatives of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority -- the organization known as McPier, which runs McCormick Place.
The exhibitors said they want McPier "to trim its take on electrical service and food service, and to open up both exclusive services to multiple providers. And they want union rules relaxed so they can do more of their own booth work."
Meanwhile, Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn signed legislation this week that would fire the current McPier board and replace it with an interim panel that, presumably, will be more likely to embrace changes at the convention center.
When auto industry writers don't like the appearance of a car interior, they pull out a word that's meant as a serious insult: plasticky.
I saw it most recently in an Automotive News report on the new Mazda2. The interior of the five-door hatchback was unveiled Feb. 11 at the Canadian International Auto Show in Toronto.
"Compared to the current European edition, the North American model will have an upgraded audio head unit, higher-grade climate control knobs, and seats with higher-grade fabric and stylish piping," the story said. "The look and feel of the top of the instrument panel appears to be less plasticky."
I shared the mention with Rhoda Miel, the Detroit-based staff reporter for Plastics News, who told me this story:
At an interiors show, I was talking to a plastics guy who said he was looking at a high-end car on display. One of the guys complained about the "plasticky fake wood" touches. The plastics guy just looked at him and said: "Well then, plastics must be getting a lot better at wood trim, because that's real wood."
Maybe the problem was the finish on the wood. You'd think the luxury car makers could use a coating that's less ...
Here's a bit of marketing that caught my eye today: Igus Inc. is touting how a manufacturer of horse-drawn farming equipment is using one of its plastic products as an alternative to a traditional metal part.
The release notes that the farm equipment maker is using iglide plastic plain bearings on a "crumbler" mechanism, a tool used to crush clods of dirt during the tilling process. Customers for the tools are primarily Amish communities.
"The bearings replaced a system of metal shafts and collars that required messy lubricants and frequent maintenance," the release notes.
I imagine that if the parts work, if they last a long time without needing to be replaced, and if they aren't too colorful, they'll be accepted just fine by the Amish customers.
Have you ever visited a trade show, then gone to a hospitality suite sponsored by a company not exhibiting at the show? It happens all the time, and people in the convention business call those non-exhibiting vendors "outboarders."
According to The New York Times, some trade shows consider outboarders "parasites who latch onto the host convention and reap the advantages of the often-considerable resources spent on organizing the show and drawing a crowd -- without paying their share of the costs."
And now they're trying to crack down on the practice.
The story describes how CES is stepping up efforts to police outboarding. The show organizer worked with local hotels to prevent companies from setting up in-room product marketing exhibits.
I'm sure that plastics firms that attend -- or exhibit -- at many end-market-oriented trade shows have seen some examples of outboarding for years. Do you think it's actually on the rise, or are show organizers just starting to pay more attention to the problem?
Crain's Chicago Business and the Chicago Tribuneare reporting that officials from Chicago's convention and tourism bureau plan to meet Feb. 17 with trade show clients to present their plan for reorganizing McCormick Place's troubled operations.
The roundtable discussion with 40 exhibitors will address concerns on how the convention center will cut costs, said a spokeswoman for the Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau, quoted by Crain's Chicago Business.
She declined to name which trade show organizers it will be meeting with.
Any guesses? How about the International Home and Housewares Show, which announced last month that it was considering moving from McCormick to either Las Vegas or Orlando, Fla.
Such a move would be a disaster for Chicago, which already is losing the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows to Orlando.
The Feb. 8 issue of Plastics News includes an editorial against legislative bans and taxes on plastic bags. [I'm the author, the column is headlined "Do you need a bag? Yeah, make it plastic." And, as usual, the cartoon from Rich Williams is brilliant.]
But Plastics News isn't alone in editorializing against bag bans this week. The Gazette Times in Corvallis, Ore., has a column headlined "Trust market to kill plastic bag use."
Sure, that headline doesn't scream "pro-plastic." But the columns have some parallels.
Both criticize legislative efforts to ban or tax plastic bags. The Corvallis column is aimed at a proposal from two Oregon legislators -- Portland Democrat Mark Hass and Central Point Republican Jason Atkinson -- that would ban plastic bags.
Hass told the Oregonian newspaper that plastic bags contribute to litter, are hard to recycle, hurt marine life and are made from fossil fuels. That's all true.
It also is true, however, that the bags can be recycled. (It's also true, for what it's worth, that 85 percent of the plastic bags used in the United States are made in this country, and that some 4,000 Americans are directly employed in their manufacture.)
The best approach here, we believe, is to continue with efforts to persuade consumers to move to reusable bags. We trust that the market will follow consumer preference. We don't need to use a heavy-handed approach such as a ban or a surcharge on the plastic bags. That's a pain for consumers -- and it could potentially hurt retailers, who frankly don't need any additional worry right now.
I like the approach -- encouraging the public to stop being wasteful, without resorting to passing a law to require it. It echoes my column, where I wrote that bag taxes and bans aren't the answer, but I don't object to non-legislative efforts to get people to cut down on bag consumption.
The coating being used during an event as global as the Super Bowl, which is seen by hundreds of millions of people around the world, shows how Dow products are applied, but also is fun for employees, Dow spokeswoman Tracie Copeland said.
"Being able to point to something is just fun," Copeland said. "It's nice to be able to say, 'Hey, I make that out in the plants and, because of what we make, we make those guys safer and keep the helmets stronger.'"
Meanwhile, up in New York at the Rochester Business Journal, the attention is on ice cream. More specifically, the Buddy Cone, a polystyrene ice cream packaging "system" from Buddy Cone Systems Inc., which the newspaper reports is being used at Sun Life Stadium in Miami.
"We've always known the Buddy System was a super product," President and CEO Robert Sotile told the RBJ. "Now, it's confirmed."
The Super Bowl is all about hype, right? Everything about it -- silly interviews, expensive commercials, huge half-time show -- screams "watch me, watch me."
So it's no surprise that some plastics companies are going to seek a bit of attention for their role in the spectacle.
Watch for more cool plastics-in-sports applications coming soon from the Winter Olympics.
Did you know that the average average straight-time labor cost for contractors at Chicago's McCormick Place is $66.30 an hour, compared with $42.62 in Las Vegas and $26.83 in Orlando, Fla.?
Those numbers come from the Chicago Tribune, reporting today on an analysis of cost differences between major exhibit locales prepared by two major trade show contractors, Freeman and GES Exposition Services.
The Tribune, which has a copy of the report, said the numbers reflect costs charged to the contractors, and include benefits and payroll taxes.
The story, headlined "McCormick Place work rules inflate labor costs, study finds," says the Freeman/GES report also cites examples where union rules at McCormick require more workers to handle tasks than would be needed in Orlando or Las Vegas:
Chicago requires the presence of four non-working union stewards for the duration of the show, including setup and tear-down days. The cost for 12 days, in two halls, is an estimated $50,915. In Las Vegas, only one non-working steward is required, at a cost of $8,183; in Orlando, none is required.
Chicago contracts require a standby labor pool of 10 tradesmen during the event, which can cost at least $40,333 for a four-day show in two halls. Las Vegas and Orlando require standby pools of two, at an estimated cost of $5,455 in Las Vegas and $3,434 in Orlando.
Those are some numbers that will get your attention.
The story quotes John Patronski, executive vice president at GES, saying that while McCormick's union workers have made concessions, "there's still a huge difference between Chicago and other cities."
But Chicago Federation of Labor President Dennis Gannon didn't back down from his stance that contractors aren't passing along the savings to customers that the unions have already approved.
"Don't you think it's kind of awkward for GES and Freeman, who make their profits on the backs of working men and women, to do an analysis of labor costs at McCormick Place?" he said. "Maybe labor should do one on how much money Freeman and GES made in Chicago."
So the finger-pointing on McCormick costs continues.
When the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. announced that the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows will move to Orlando, it predicted that the industry will save $20 million -- $10 million for exhibitors, and another $10 million for attendees.
Many in the plastics industry know Eastman Chemical Co. as a PET resin supplier. But the company may be planning to exit that business, according to a story in the daily paper where the company is headquartered.
The story was generated from an interview that Eastman President and CEO Jim Rogers gave to the newspaper on Feb. 3.
Rogers said PET hasn't made any money for Eastman since 2005. The company has made some major changes in the PET business in recent years -- selling plants around the world, and investing millions in its IntegRex technology at its only remaining PET plant in Columbia, S.C.
Now, he said, it's time for the business to start to perform.
"Our patience is measured in months, not years," Rogers told the newspaper.
"I think the real test is going to come in the second quarter to see just how much our guys have been able to do about demonstrating to the markets that we've got our act together now, and we deserve our fair piece of ... higher-value segments." Rogers said.
"We're going to get through the second quarter and see how we do, and then we'll take a look," he said.
That's about as clear a signal I've seen that a business has a very specific deadline to show improved results.
It's also a pretty clear signal to competitors that this business is on the block.
Eastman isn't alone in looking for a buyer for some major plastics assets. It looks like the resin sector is in for some major restructuring in 2010.
Remember the Plastiki -- the boat made out of old PET bottles that David de Rothschild plans to sail from California to Australia, to raise awareness of marine debris?
The Plastics Blog first discovered the project almost two years ago. Now, finally, the voyage is almost ready to get started.
Carl Nolte of the San Francisco Chronicle reports that Rothschild took the 60-foot-long catamaran out for a shakedown cruise on Feb. 3, and the actual voyage should get started next month, weather permitting.
Some interesting snippets from the story: the boat's twin hulls are made of 12,500 PET bottles, which are filled with dry ice.
Nolte says the boat is "no beauty," describing it as looking "like a kid's science project."
Let's hope it's sturdy enough to safely carry its 8-member crew on the long haul to Australia.
"Paper or plastic" has become a cliche, but with retailers trying to cut down on plastic bag usage, consumers should get used to a new phrase at the checkout: "Do you need a bag?"
Getting asked that question doesn't bother me, but it sure set off Carol Midgley, a feature writer and columnist for The Times. She recently wrote a funny column for the London paper headlined "Saving the planet or just toying with us?"
Midgley was buying some figurines at The Disney Store, and the clerk asked if she preferred to pay 5 pence for a carrier bag, £1.50 for a "re-usable" carrier, or skip using a bag entirely.
"Now hold on a minute, matey," she wrote. "I don't mind doing my bit; I know that charging for bags might be the only way to cure humanity's preposterous wastefulness. But I draw the line at being lectured on plastic overuse by a chuffing toy retailer."
She added later: "Being urged to be eco-conscious by any toy shop is like being chided for your caffeine intake by a crystal meth addict."
Delightful stuff. Thanks to Plastics News' correspondent in Mexico City, Steve Downer, for pointing it out today.
Relief workers in Haiti have begun to distribute tarps and plastic sheeting to provide makeshift shelter for up to 1 million earthquake victims, according to The Miami Herald.
The Geneva-based International Organization of Migration is "rushing to distribute" its "stocks of tarpaulins and plastic sheeting until sufficient numbers of family-sized tents can be brought into the country."
IOM made it clear that the plastic tarps are a temporary solution to a huge problem.
"Tents are a three-five month option in the midst of the dry season. But emergency and transitional shelter solutions sufficiently durable to last at least two years need to be found before the heavy rains arrive in a few months," said Vincent Houver, IOM Chief of Mission in Haiti.
"Ohio is a soybean state. We are a corn state. We are a logistics state, situated right in the heart of it all. And we are the polymer state.
"All these things make us the ideal location for an advanced biorefinery that converts farm output into food, fuel and biopolymers.
"Toothbrushes, cell phones, printer cartridges -- there's a list of products as long as my arm that are made today from petroleum-based plastic that could be made from biopolymers.
"And I'll tell you this, there is nothing more important we could do for the security and sustainability of our nation than base our economy on the output of Midwestern farmers instead of Middle Eastern oil barons.
"So to the companies drawing up plans to build a biorefinery -- bring those plans to us. Because with our agricultural output, our knowhow, and our location, we are sitting on a treasure and we will do everything in our power to tap it."
Clearly Strickland would like to have a big bioplastic plant in Ohio.
But the Buckeye State has plenty of competition on that front.
At this point, Iowa is the leader. Telles, a joint venture owned by Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland Co., already has a commercial-scale plant capable of making Mirel-brand corn sugar-based polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) resin in Clinton, Iowa.
Today Strickland sent a message to future potential bioplastic projects: Ohio will pull out all the stops to get you to locate there.
The Earth911.com blog posted a story today on the plastics industry's role in increasing the sustainable attributes of consumer products, including packaging.
Earth911.com staffer Jennifer Berry called me last week with some general questions about what's new in plastics that consumers can expect to see in coming months. As a result, the blog quotes me a couple of times, along with Fred Roselli, spokesman for Coca-Cola Enterprises.
I'll highlight one of my points here. We chatted about various materials that plastics processors are using to meet customers' sustainability goals -- recycled-content resins and bio-based plastics, for example. I pointed out that processors are sampling a variety of materials now, and they're ready to use whatever customers -- and, ultimately, consumers -- demand.
Here's what I said:
"When I think about plastics processors changing materials, they're flexible. They can shift to what their customers want. They're willing to use recycled content, etc. It all depends on cost[,] performance and if that's what the customer wants."
The Wall Street Journal posted a Q&A interview, plus a video interview, with Dow Chemical Co. CEO Andrew Liveris today. Among other things, he talks about recent efforts to work more closely with customers.
"Dow has historically been of a mindset that if you build it they will come," he said. But now the company is trying to do a better job of anticipating customers' needs.
"In this last year, I have been picking up the phones and calling fellow CEOs [to] enable my salesforce and engineers to get access to [customers'] marketing and R&D organizations to look at their future needs -- emissions controls, eco-efficient buildings and houses, removal of containaments of water to provide more pure water."
Some of the companies that Liveris says he's met with include Procter & Gamble, General Electric, Unilever and Coca-Cola.
"We have to work with their R&D departments to see what are their needs," Liveris said.
Another interesting snippet: Liveris mentions that when Dow was in crisis mode in early 2009 (following the collapse of a deal with Kuwait's state-owned Petrochemicals Industries Co.), one of the people he turned to for advice was Tony Carbone, Dow's former executive vice president of plastics, hydrocarbons and energy.
"He [Carbone] helped me and my inner team make sure we had all the pieces in place to run the fix," Liveris said.
Jeff Ritter, who works in the Pittsburgh headquarters of Lanxess Corp., is using his expertise in procurement to head up coordination efforts for Deep Springs International, a Grove City, Pa.-based non-profit that helps Haitians obtain safe drinking water.
Jeff is leading this effort because his son, Michael, was working for DSI in Baudin, Haiti, when the earthquake hit.
"After the earthquake hit and I knew my son Michael was OK, I approached my boss about devoting some time to assisting my son's emergency response effort," said Jeff Ritter.
Jeff works in the technical and services procurement department at Lanxess.
For DSI, he is currently serving full-time as the primary liaison/communicator with suppliers to help coordinate clean water efforts in the disaster response.
Lanxess donated $200,000 to help fund DSI's project, which the company said will provide 20,000 household water purification systems for the relief effort. The company also helped procure 4 million chemical water treatment tablets for Haitian families.
Jeff Ritter has previous emergency response procurement experience because of two hurricanes that hit Lanxess plants in the past few years.
"Any type of natural disaster response situation is a totally different mode of action than a typical day-to-day job," Ritter explained. "The priorities shift and speed becomes the most important priority."
Thanks to Lanxess for sharing details about Jeff Ritter's role in the relief effort, and to Jeff for his service.
I've never heard of Milly Zantow before, but according to the Wisconsin State Journal in Madison, Wis., the 86-year-old was a pioneer of post-consumer plastics recycling in the United States.
In a story posted Jan. 17, and a related video, Zantow tells how she and her friend Jenny Ehl "cashed in their life insurance policies, bought a commercial plastics grinder for $5,000 and started E-Z Recycling, what some believe was the first business of its kind in the country."
That was in 1979.
Zantow got the idea after a visit to Japan in 1978, where she saw plastics being recycled. She wondered why there were no such companies, or recycling infrastructure, in the United States.
Plastics packaging was just beginning to take off. Remember, this was before plastic bottles even had resin codes to help identify the material.
Zantow knew nothing about plastics, but she soon became an expert. She called processors in Wisconsin and discovered that they already recycled their in-house scrap.
According to the story, Zantow deserves at least partial credit for coming up with the idea for a bottle recycling code:
Zantow wanted to come up with a simple system to classify plastics, and that led to the development of the number code that identifies the polymer type.
At the urging of recyclers such as Zantow across the country, the Society of the Plastics Industry developed the numbered codes in 1988, said Tisha Petteway, a spokeswoman for the federal Environmental Protection Agency. They allow recyclers to divert the different types of plastic to specific recycling streams and now are used around the world.
Zantow didn't stay in the plastics recycling business for long. She told the State Journal that the business "never made a nickel" in the few years she ran it, and she sold it in 1982 to a Milwaukee company that folded in 1984.
It's an interesting story and video, definitely worth a look for Plastics Blog readers interested in recycling.
For the record, though, I'd like to stress that plastics recycling absolutely dates back before Zantow and E-Z Recycling, even in Wisconsin.
One such pioneer was Irv Vincent, founder of N.E.W. Plastics Corp. in Luxemburg, Wis.
Vincent founded N.E.W., a blow molder, in 1968. He branched into plastics recycling in the early 1970s, according to a profile that Plastics News published in 2003.
Who was the first plastics recycler? That's hard to say. But pioneers like Vincent and Zantow deserve credit for helping to create a sector of the plastics industry that today the entire industry depends on to buttress its sustainability claims.
This story doesn't really aim its satire at the plastics industry. The target is the public, specifically people who don't make the effort to recycle PET water bottles.
According to the inner monologue of millions upon millions of citizens, while not necessarily ideal, throwing away one empty bottle probably wouldn't make that much of a difference, and could even be forgiven, considering how long they had been carrying it around with them, the time that could be saved by just tossing it out right here, and the fact that they had bicycled to work once last July.
In addition, pretty much the entire states of Missouri and New Mexico calmly reassured themselves Monday that they definitely knew better than to do something like this, but admitted that hey, nobody is perfect, and at least they weren't still using those horrible aerosol cans, or just throwing garbage directly on the ground.
All agreed that disposing of what would eventually amount to 50 tons of thermoplastic polymer resin wasn't the end of the world.
"It's not like I don't care, because I do, and most of the time I don't even buy bottled water," thought Missouri school teacher Heather Delamere, the 450,000th caring and progressive individual to have done so that morning, and the 850,000th to have purchased the environmentally damaging vessel due to being thirsty, in a huge rush, and away from home. "It's really not worth beating myself up over."
It's evident that someone at The Onion knows a little bit about plastics -- or at least they think plastics are funny enough to merit attention. Remember the tongue-in-cheek story last year about the paper being sold to a Chinese injection molder?
Reminding readers that they should recycle PET is a good thing, and using humor might be a very effective way to get people to pay attention. Keep up the good work, Onion staffers.
Yung-Ching Wang, billionaire founder of Formosa Plastics Group, will pay an estimated US$313 million in estate taxes to the Taipei National Tax Administration, according to the Economic Daily News in Taiwan.
The paper notes that Wang's inheritance tax is the largest ever, and by itself will cover almost two years of inheritance tax budgets set by the Ministry of Finance.
Wang left an estate of NT$60 billion (US$1.88 billion). But after exemptions and an income tax rebate, "only" NS$20 billion (US$626 million) is taxable.
For those Plastics Blog readers who are quick at math -- yes, the tax rate on that estate is a whopping 50 percent.
The story notes that Wang died on Oct. 15, 2008, several months before Taiwan cut its inheritance tax rate to only 10 percent.
The story notes that Wang's survivors will sell some of Wang's stock to pay the tax.
Estate tax laws in the United States are going to be in the news this year. Congress and the Obama administration will have to decide how to deal with pending changes that could see the death tax rate drop to 0 percent, and then leap to 55 percent next year.
You know the old joke about death and taxes? Well, I don't expect Washington to repeal either one.
The article barely mentions the catalyst for this mess -- the decision by the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. to move the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows to Orlando, Fla.
In November, a big triennial plastics show that had been bringing as many as 75,000 people to Chicago since 1971 jumped to Orlando, saying it expected to save $20 million for its members through the move.
The Plastics Blog reader who shared the story this morning noted that the story doesn't even name the show. "I was amused that NPE was referenced without its name as 'a big triennial plastics show,'" he wrote.
Good point -- and I'll add that many in the Chicago media didn't use the name NPE, either.
I imagine some reporters outside the industry are confused because the intials don't stand for "National Plastics Exposition" anymore, so they just write around it rather than using an acronym that means nothing to their readers.
Anyway, I suppose this means NPE's move is finally officially a national business story. So now we should expect to see Fortune, Forbes and BusinessWeek take up the issue.
Plastics exhibitors, get ready for a new round of coverage.
Greg Hinz, a columnist for Crain's Chicago Business, posted a blog item today on a proposal by several unions to make a McCormick Place more competitive with other trade show venues.
The unions called for audits of trade-show operators and McCormick Place contractors to make sure they are passing on labor-cost savings to their customers, and drafting a customer bill of rights.
"Unions at McCormick Place have worked with management time and again to lower their costs and make work rules more customer-friendly," said Dennis Gannon, president of the Chicago Federation of Labor. "But the whole business model must change, not just labor contracts."
The unions say labor rates in Chicago are already competitive -- they pointed to data from Tradeshow Week that said the labor rate for a carpenter at a show in Chicago is $96.68 an hour, compared to $148.89 in New York and $99.96 in Los Angeles.
The unions say high drayage fees are a big problem at McCormick Place, even compared to nearby Rosemont, Ill. According to their news release:
The hourly rate charged to an exhibitor for a carpenter in Rosemont is $85, where the workers are represented by the same unions as McCormick Place. But the price charged to the exhibitor is almost $11 cheaper. Rosemont exhibitors pay $55 per hour for drayage, but more than $80 in Chicago. Drayage can account for close to 50 percent of an exhibitor's show services bill, according to Michael Hughes, vice president of research and consulting for Tradeshow Weekly.
The unions are trying to help bring down costs at McCormick, which has to be good news in a city still reeling from the loss of the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows shows to Orlando, Fla.
Still, Chicago convention officials know that they're not being measured against New York and Los Angeles. Those aren't the cities that are taking business from McCormick.
The key to Chicago's convention future is to become more competitive with Orlando and Las Vegas.
Material ConneXion, a materials consultancy, recently honored new materials -- some plastics, some not -- with its first annual Medium Awards for Material of the Year.
The big winner isn't really plastic (although it does have a PVC backing). It's called Concrete Cloth from a U.K. company called Concrete Canvas. The material is a flexible fabric impregnated with cement, which allows it to be quickly and easily molded and set into shapes.
"With the simple addition of water, Concrete Cloth makes it possible to create safe, durable, non-combustible structures for a wide range of commercial, military and humanitarian uses," said Andrew H. Dent, Vice President, Library & Materials Research at Material ConneXion, in a news release. "This innovation is especially remarkable for enabling the construction of rapidly deployable shelter and food storage structures in disaster relief situations."
Material ConneXion also recognized 11 Material of the Year honorable mentions. Some of the more interesting ones, including some with plastics connections, include:
Connex 3D Multiple Material Printers, from Objet Geometries, enable the creation of prototypes and models that are closer to the form of the desired end product.
Curran by Cellucomp is a high-strength biofiber formulated from degraded carrots with a stiffness that rivals carbon fiber.
Innegra S fiber by Innegrity is a light high-performance fiber for use in composite ballistics fabrics, sporting goods, marine and automotive applications, and military helmets.
Liquid Silicone Rubber LSR 7070 by Momentive Performance Materials, a transparent silicone for the production of optical fibers, lenses and consumer products as an alternative to traditional thermoplastics or glass.
Millad NX8000 by Milliken Chemical, an additive that improves the clarity of polypropylene.
Pebax Rnew by Arkema, an elastomer made of up to 95 percent plant-based materials, for use in consumer products, sports equipment and footwear.
Material ConneXion currently has the award winner and finalists on dispay at its showroom in New York. The exhibit will run through Feb. 19.
The Iowa Grocery Industry Association, aware of battles over single-use bag taxes and bans around the country, is taking a proactive approach with a new program to make customers aware of plastic bag recycling opportunities.
Double the amount of plastic bags recycled over a 24-month period;
Reduce consumption of plastic bags;
Increase use of reusable bags; and
Encourage purchases of furniture and equipment made from recycled plastic through a grant program for parks and schools.
The program offers "a meaningful alternative to the banning of plastic bags, a practice that has been shown to have a number of negative unintended consequences," according to the project's Web site.
Customers are getting their first look at the program in local grocery stores this week, with a two weeks of promotions that will run statewide.
Stores are handing out bags that highlight the program, and they're also placing Build with Bags posters in the entry ways of stores near plastic bag recycling barrels.
Build with Bags is supported by the Iowa Grocery Industry Association, Keep Iowa Beautiful, Metro Waste Authority in Des Moines, Iowa Department of Natural Resources and The Des Moines Register.
Horse racing journalist Bill Finley made a joke with a plastics-related punchline in his column for ESPN.com today. But because I don't normally follow the Sport of Kings, I needed some help from Google to understand what in the world he was talking about.
Finley's column, "A look at 2010, through a crystal ball," takes an imaginary look at the horses and personalities in his sport, generating tongue-in-cheek stories he expects to see this year.
The plastics angle is right at the top:
January: The Eclipse Award ceremonies are marred by a violent demonstration by the American Plastics Council, a trade association for the U.S. plastics industry. Angry protestors hurl profanities and clods of polypropylenes at Jess Jackson.
Huh?
Here's the explanation. The Eclipse Award is an honor for the top horses, given annually. Jess Jackson isn't the former presidential candidate, he's a billionaire wine entrepreneur who owns a controlling interest in Rachel Alexandra -- you remember, the filly that won the Preakness Stakes?
Jackson made headlines in the horse racing world when he refused to send Rachel Alexandra to Santa Anita Park to the Breeders' Cup, calling the Pro-Ride synthetic surface "plastic."
OK, get it? Good. I don't want any Plastics Blog readers to miss on a good plastics-in-popular-culture reference.
Just one more thing. "Clods of propropylene"? As Dave Barry might say, that might be a good name for a rock band.
Last week the news was that South Korea's Lotte Co. Ltd. was considering buying Dow Chemical Co.'s styrenics and polycarbonate business. Today, Reuters is reporting that others are still in the hunt. The unit, dubbed Styron Corp, could still end up in the hands of a private equity buyer, or a strategic buyer other than Lotte.
According to the report, potential buyers for Styron were asked today to reconfirm their interest, "in order to narrow the field of buyers."
The story attributes that information to unnamed sources. The report also includes a comment from Dow spokesman Bob Plishka, who told the wire service on Friday that the company was still on schedule to sell the business during this quarter, and that there are strategic buyers interested in the business.
This has the appearance of Reuters catching up with last week's Dow Jones report on Styron. In the process, it looks like the Reuters reporters discovered some new details about the sale.
Where there's smoke, there's fire -- so let's expect a deal of some sort to be announced in the next three weeks.
Jim Cramer, the CNBC TV host famous for getting really excited about business stories, is bullish on plastics right now, specifically PolyOne Corp.
Cramer told his Mad Money audience on Friday that chemical companies are poised for stunning rebounds when the economy improves, and he expects to see a big jump from Avon Lake, Ohio-based PolyOne, a plastics compounder and distributor.
PolyOne's focus on higher margins and lower costs puts it into a good position as the auto and appliance industries improve, Cramer said.
Ready to curl up with a good plastic e-reader? There will be a new one on the market very soon that highlights the benefits of plastics, with a plastic screen that may revolutionize the electronics sector.
Plastic Logic LLC -- the company wants to use plastics in place of glass for e-readers -- introduced its first product, the Que, at the Consumer Electronics Show today.
CEO Richard Archuleta called the introduction "the birth of a new market category [and] a milestone in the evolution of plastic electronics."
"The Que proReader was built from the ground up for people who need to read. Starting today, mobile professionals can look forward to a paperless briefcase, a lighter load, and a better way to work," he said.
Que was designed to mimic paper, but without the weight and clutter. It's the size of a pad of paper, about 1/3 inch thick, and weighs about a pound. The shatterproof plastic display is 10.7 inches, which the company touts as largest display in the market.
Brad Stone of The New York Times Gadgetwise blog calls the Que "awfully expensive." A model with 4 gigabytes of memory, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity will sell for $649. A higher-end 8GB model with AT&T's 3G connectivity will cost $799.
Remember back in July, when Dow Chemical Co. announced that it was looking for a buyer for its styrenics and polycarbonate business, which it dubbed Styron Corp.? It may have found a buyer, according to this Dow Jones report.
The suitor is Lotte Co. Ltd., a South Korean conglomerate that got its start making candy, but today has operations in food, hotels, retail, financial services, chemicals, electronics, construction, publishing, and entertainment.
The Dow Jones story quotes an official who asked not to be named. The details make it sound credible: Deutche Bank and HSBC are advising on the potential sale, the deal is valued at between $1 billion and $2 billion (admittedly a rather large range), and that Lotte is one of the seven or eight bidders that had been under consideration.
Chicago continues to churn following the loss of the 2012 and 2015 NPE shows to Orlando, Fla. The latest news comes today from the Chicago Tribune, which reports that the convention center wants to scrap its food service contract in order to find cheaper meals for exhibitors.
CEO Juan Ochoa told the paper that "In today's economy, we recognize that cost is king."
This follows an embarrassing disclosure earlier this week from the Chicago Sun-Times: that the number of employees at McCormick Place and Navy Pier who are paid more than $100,000 a year has grown to 54, a 17 percent increase since 2006.
When the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. started looking at alternative sites for NPE, who could have guessed that they'd end up stirring the pot in Chicago politics and convention circles this much?
Here's an interesting news snippet that came out today -- a Michigan ad agency helped create a customer hospitality and business center at NPE 2009 by using the online 3D virtual world Second Life.
The agency built a virtual replica of the 36,000-square-foot ballroom, including walls and furnishings, and it applied a variety of graphic themes to see which ones worked best. Clients were able to login to Second Life and, using avatars, walk freely around the virtual room to evaluate the layout and design.
The "real" Dow customer center at McCormick Place and included meeting rooms, workstations, e-kiosks, lounge and dining areas, and a full bar. Creating the space in Second Life helped the companies work out all the bugs and maximize the layout and design of the exhibit.
According to Greg Baldwin, Dow Basic Plastics communications manager, the virtual 3D ballroom was an invaluable tool.
"When you're working in such a large space, it's difficult to predict every nuance that will impact the look, feel, and functionality of the room -- color choices, deciding where graphics are needed and where they aren't, or even arrangement of dining tables. I was able to log-in to the virtual customer center any time and feel confident about the final decisions," he said in a news release.
"When I first arrived at the actual customer center, my reaction was 'I've been here before,'" Baldwin said. "There were absolutely no surprises, for me or executive leadership."
Dow said it hosted nearly 1,137 customers at the "real" center during NPE week.
It makes you wonder, how close are we to the day when trade shows are replaced by virtual shows, and we'll all be using avatars for our travel and business meetings?
This could be the ultimate in design-for-recyclability: a team of students from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute have designed a teddy bear made entirely from PET.
The toy, dubbed the "Sustain-a-Bear," recently won first prize in the 2009 Manufacturing Student Design Competition held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Instead of stitching it together, this politically correct bear is designed to be assembled using ultrasonic welding.
"This lack of adhesives and stitching, paired with the fact that the bear is stuffed with scraps of the same fleece from which its exterior is made, means a Sustain-a-Bear at the end of its days can be tossed in the recycling bin and easily find a second life as brand-new bear. (Or maybe a soda bottle.)," the release says.
The group is pursuing full patent protection, with an eye toward eventually commercializing or licensing the product.
"The teddy bear market is huge, and despite all the billions of dollars of sales every year, no one has really looked into manufacturing stuffed animals in a sustainable way," said mechanical engineering doctoral student Christina Laskowski, who was part of the team.
"It's hard to know what to do with old teddy bears, because they're difficult to clean, they get damaged when you wash them, and they usually end up in a landfill," said Todd Snelson, another doctoral student who was part of the team. "We wanted to make a bear that didn't end up in landfills, something that still had utility at the end of its product life."
Strikes are pretty rare events these days -- according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were only 15 lockouts or strikes in the United States in 2008. With the economy slumping this year, the number is probably even lower.
So it's notable that there were a few strikes in the plastics industry this year.
The Plastics Blog has already noted the strike at Co. Inc.'s Terre Haute, Ind., plant in July and August. That strike lasted 40 days.
The second strike was more recent, and shorter. According to the Sandusky, Ohio, Register, workers at A. Schulman Inc.'s Bellevue, Ohio, plant went on strike on Dec. 7. They voted to end the strike on Dec. 23, although they won't return to work until Jan. 4, after the holiday break.
The workers now have a new 3-year contract.
The Register story paraphrases comments from a union official, who said Schulman management wrongly assumed that the terrible economy would prevent workers from striking.
I have to believe that most employers would be surprised these days if workers went on strike.
Is anyone in the federal government working on cleaning up the Great Pacific Garbage Patch? Yes, according to The Washington Post -- and the point person is Holly Bamford, director and chief of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Marine Debris Program.
NOAA's Marine Debris Program has set up 160 projects since Bamford came on board in 2005. In one, bins are provided at 16 East Coast ports where fishermen can dispose of their gear at no cost.
She told the newspaper, "... once we present our research on the degradation caused by litter and debris on our seafloors, on our beaches, and in our waterways, people will be more inclined to reduce, reuse and recycle a non-degradable item, which in turn reduces marine debris."
The first-ever General Electric Plastics plant will shut down by the end of 2010, according to a story from the Taunton, Mass., Gazette.
The plant, now the Haskon Aerospace unit of Esterline Technologies Corp., "was known as the first factory in General Electric's plastics division," according to the story.
GE operated the plant for 60 years, and employed 800 there. Now it is down to 101 workers.
The factory makes rubber seals for airplane doors and windows. The parent company is consolidating those operations at a larger plant in Brea, Calif.
A live crowd of 25,000 witnessed the first Dreamliner liftoff in Everett, Wash., as well as millions more on live TV. (Check out the number of people who tweated about the test flight on their Twitter sites today).
Soon enough, all those composite aircraft fans will be able to take a ride of their own. Boeing plans to test the jets for about nine months, and then deliver the first to a customer late next year.
A trade show that spent about $40,000 for electrical services in another city got charged $240,000 for the services in Chicago's McCormick Place.
Another show organizer complained that it recently spent $125,000 on sandwich and salad-bar lunch and beverage services at McCormick, which covered 2,600 lunches over three days. (I'll save you the trouble, that's $48 per meal).
The story starts with a plastics machinery company example, but it's not from a company that had a bad experience at NPE2009. The source this time is Steve Maguire, who is connected to two auxiliary equipment companies that made a high-profile decision not to exhibit at NPE this year.
He cited a number of examples of charges that he felt were too high in Chicago. For example, it cost $22,000 to move equipment from the truck yard near McCormick to its exhibit space and back -- which he said was more than triple the cost of shipping the equipment all the way from Baltimore.
"You just can't stand being taken advantage of, and that's what they do there," Maguire told the Tribune. "When the economy got so bad, this was an easy one to cut."
The Tribune story notes that the absence of Maguire Products Inc. and Novatec Inc. from NPE this year "cost Chicago about $600,000 in potential spending." Plastics News' story from April had said that under normal circumstances, the firms would have spent around $750,000.
There's no major new ground broken on this Tribune story today, but the focus on costs -- breaking down some specific examples that typical readers can understand -- is interesting.
One snippet of potential news: Phil Brandl, president of the International Housewares Association, said that group's annual show is booked at McCormick Place only through 2011. "Though it has made longer-term commitments in the past, it is now waiting longer to sign on, keeping an eye on the competitive landscape," the story notes.
To put it all of the discussion about high cost into perspective, several sources in the Tribune story pointed out that Chicago is not alone in charging a lot for various services at trade shows.
"We're not that out of whack with what our competitors are charging, but we are looking at ways to lower costs," said David Causton, McCormick Place general manager.
"Chicago is not the only convention center in the world to have what we would consider ridiculously high food prices," said Peter Eelman, vice president of exhibitions for the Association For Manufacturing Technology, which puts on the IMTS show every two years in McCormick Place.
"But if there is an opportunity to turn things around, that would be an area to turn around quickly. It would really demonstrate a commitment to changing things," he said.
You'd think sporting goods designers would have created the perfect soccer ball by now -- after all, it's just sphere. But every few years they come out with a new version -- always better than the last, yet never popular with goalkeepers.
The newest ball, the Jabulani, was unveiled on Dec. 4 for the 2010 World Cup. (If you're wondering, Jabulani means "to celebrate" in the Bantu's isiZulu language).
What's new about this ball? The design itself. Regular balls are made with 32 hexagonal panels. The Teamgeist ball that Adidas created for the 2006 World Cup had only 14 panels.
But the Jabilani ball has only 8 panels.
As before, the panels are made of EVA and thermoplastic polyurethane -- not leather -- and they're thermally bonded -- not sewn together. Adidas says this new ball is "perfectly round and even more accurate than ever before."
A news release from Adidas notes that "Following the first tests, players all over the world are enthusiastic and are promising many goals with the new ball." Among others, it quotes German star Michael Ballack: "Fantastic, the ball does exactly what I want it to."
Perhaps that's the problem for goalkeepers -- they don't necessarily want a ball that does exactly what midfielders want! And they certainly don't want a ball that promises "many goals."
South African keeper Hans Vonk has already expressed his dislike of the Jabulani, telling Dutch magazine Voetbal International "It is claimed the ball holds its line exactly, but in reality it veers off in all directions. The ball is lighter and there seems to be more plastic used than previously."
"It is a tragedy for goalkeepers."
Blog readers may recall that it's not unusual for keepers to complain about new soccer ball designs. Perhaps they'd prefer to just play without a ball altogether!
If you're hosting executives from India who want to buy your company for as much as $12 billion, where do you take them out to dinner? How about a nice Indian restaurant?
That's where executives from LyondellBasell Industries AF and Reliance Industries Ltd. dined in Houston on Wednesday night, according to the Houston Chronicle.
Spokesmen for the companies did not confirm the meeting, but the newspaper attributed the story to the manager at Kiran's Restaurant and Bar, which is described as an "upscale Indian restaurant."
The manager even noted that Reliance Chairman Mukesh Ambani did not attend the dinner, but he was sent a take-out meal.
So it looks like the rumors that other suitors for LyondellBasell might emerge could be wrong, and the deal is getting done over plates of naan, tandoori meats and saffron rice. What could be better?
Coca-Cola's new PlantBottle -- a PET bottle made in-part from plant feedstocks -- is about to hit the store shelves. Scott Vitters, Coke's global head of sustainable packaging, gave an interview about the material to Marc Gunther, a senior writer for GreenBiz.com.
Here are a few of the highlights:
The PET resin in the bottles is made from 30 percent plant-based material, and Coke's R&D teams are to make the remaining 70 percent from renewable sources, too.
The material currently is made from sugar cane and molasses, a byproduct of the sugar production process, from Brazil. Vitters said the material is "not perfect, but the commitment from the Brazilian government, the growers down there ... enabled us to be able to get started with this process, as we look toward a long-term vision of using plant waste material."
The company has proven in the lab that it is technically feasible to make bottles from 100 percent plant-based resin.
The PlantBottle resin costs more than conventional PET, but for now the company is not charging customers a premium price. Eventually, the company expects to bring down the cost of the plant-based resin.
Vitters put it this way:
" It's largely driven because of an unoptimized supply chain. ... Long term though, we believe we can drive that price down through improving the supply chain, as well as ongoing work to look at plant waste materials, and increasing our use of recycled materials."
Littering has decreased by 61 percent in America during the past 40 years, but the amount of plastic litter is actually up 165.4 percent, according to a study released today by Keep America Beautiful Inc.
Is it any wonder that there's public pressure to ban or tax plastic bags and polystyrene foodservice products, and to place deposits on PET water bottles and other beverage containers?
KAB touts the new study as the largest litter study ever conducted in the U.S., and the first major national survey of litter in the U.S. in 40 years.
Despite the perception that plastic is the top litter problem, the study found that it is actually No. 3. Tobacco products are the biggest problem, accounting for 37.7 percent of all litter, and paper products are No. 2 at 21.9 percent.
Plastic accounts for 19.3 percent of litter, followed by metal at 5.8 percent and glass at 4.5 percent.
But the big problem is that plastics' share of the litter pie has exploded.
Since 1969, paper litter has dropped 78.9 percent; metal litter is down 88.2 percent, glass is down 86.4 percent -- but plastic is up 165.4 percent.
There's a good explanation for the increase, of course -- the amount of plastic packaging used in the U.S. over the past 40 years has skyrocketed (up 340 percent per capita). Much of the gains by plastics have been at the expense of metal, glass and paper packaging.
So, naturally, researchers are going to find more plastic in litter today than in 1969.
Some more highlights from the report:
Litter conservatively costs our nation $11.5 billion per year. These are direct costs, including cleanup and prevention programs.
There are also major indirect costs: including decreased commerce, tourism, and health effects. A significant problem: decreased property values. 93 percent of homeowners, 55 percent of real estate agents and 90 percent of property appraisers said a littered neighborhood would decrease their assessment of a home's value.
The study said there are at least 51.2 billion pieces of litter on roadways in the U.S.; an average of 6,729 pieces of litter per mile.
The study concludes that education and cleanups work, as does investing in trash receptacles.
It called for boosting the nation's recycling infrastructure (only 12 percent of public spaces surveyed had recycling receptacles), and funding is needed for education programs, volunteer programs and infrastructure.
They say the first step to fixing a problem is to acknowledge it exists. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley took a big step in that direction on Tuesday, when he told reporters why McCormick Place is losing business, including the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows.
Asked if the convention center is gouging exhibitors, Daley said: "Yes, gouging. ... You have to get away from gouging people. If you gouge `em, they're not gonna come back, to be very frank."
The Chicago Sun-Timesalso reported that Daley blamed trade show managers and the McCormick Place unions for the convention center's spate of recent defections, which started with SPI's decision to move NPE to Orlando, Fla.
"If someone works for $50- or $70-an-hour, it shouldn't cost [exhibitors] $100" to put up a booth, the mayor told reporters.
"There's ... trade show managers, McCormick Place and the unions. It's a combination of the three. ... It's both a McPier and show manager issue" as well.
Are government subsidies in McCormick Place's future? Or perhaps a major purge of all the politically connected managers from the convention agency payroll?
The editorial pages of Chicago are lining up with calls for change, in the wake of SPI's decision to move the 2012 and 2015 NPE trade shows to Orlando, Fla.
According to the column, the root of the problems at the agency that runs McCormick Place "is its double identity as a convention agency and a source of patronage jobs for the politicians who control it. ... [T]oo many jobs at all levels go to people whose political credentials are more apparent than their convention expertise. And too many McPier contracts go to companies that contribute cash to political bosses," the editorial states.
"Only a thoroughly professional convention operation can compete for shows with destinations such as Orlando and Las Vegas. McPier should purge politics from its operations. This may sound like a tall order in Illinois, but it's the only way to save our convention industry."
The same issue of Crain's Chicago includes a letter to the editor from John S. Gates Jr. and Juan A. Ochoa, the chairman and CEO, respectively, of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority. They note that "everything is on the table" in their efforts to address Chicago's problems.
Despite generating an estimated $8 billion in annual economic activity and supporting 66,000 jobs, there is not a designated revenue stream from the city or the state into our operating budgets, while our competitors in Orlando and Las Vegas are both heavily subsidized and supported by their states and cities. We're working night and day to change our business model, and we'll continue to do so until it's fixed.
So don't be surprised if some sort of government subsidy for McPier is soon on the agenda.
The Chicago Tribune has editorialized twice on the topic (and both columns cite Plastics News as a source of information).
First, "Chicago as Gouge City" on Nov. 18 blasted the convention authorities, saying their attitude toward exhibitors was "Because we can. You got a problem with that?"
That column seemed to doubt the ability of convention center officials, who were promising change following the departure of NPE.
McPier remains trapped by the lesson it never learned: Blind optimism, political influence and onerous labor costs for exhibitors don't combine to form a winning strategy. McPier has too much overhead, too much debt, too much fealty to its unions -- and some remarkable coincidences between who makes big political contributions and who wins contracts.
It concludes:
How many more defections of trade shows, how many more raids on the state treasury, how many more clouted hires, how many more costly labor rules, until the politicians and board members responsible for McPier reassert the convention industry pre-eminence that used to be Chicago's?
It's good to see this issue getting such high-profile attention.
As I noted in our Nov. 23 editorial, Chicago's future as a trade show center has some pretty big problems, namely a reputation for poor service and high prices.
It's now been a month and a half since Plastics Newsfirst reported that SPI was considering moving NPE to Orlando.
It's been two-and-a-half months since we published Tim Hanrahan's column on the high price of exhibiting in Chicago.
Chicago's media has embraced the story, and it now seems likely that some real changes are coming to McCormick Place.
Crain's Cleveland Business named its "Forty under 40" list of up-and-coming young professionals today, and one executive has ties to plastics.
Robert Patterson has been chief financial officer at PolyOne Corp. in Avon Lake, Ohio, since May 2008. The story notes that his job at the publicly traded resin compounder and distributor "seems more than a little safe. At PolyOne, he's led the company's efforts into Six Sigma cost-cutting initiatives and improved its balance sheet and financial position at a crucial time."
At age 36, the story notes that Patterson is "fairly young to be a CFO anywhere, let alone at a major public company." But PolyOne Chairman and CEO Stephen Newlin said looking at just Patterson's age is misleading.
"His experience, wisdom, professional maturity and leadership skills are vastly greater than his chronological age," Newlin said. "He's tackled substantial challenges -- reducing our working capital, improving our liquidity, and eliminating waste, while also strengthening our financial team."
Congratulations to Patterson and all of this year's "Forty under 40."
This weekend we got the confirmation that Reliance Industries Ltd. was making a cash bid for LyondellBasell Industries AF.
Now, it seems, more potential buyers are coming out of the woodwork.
Today Bloomberg is reporting that China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. and U.S. buyout firm Texas Pacific Group are interested in buying LyondellBasell.
Other candidates could surface, although some of the usual suspects might be distracted because they're working on other deals, according to this report from the Asian Chemicals Connection blog.
Will Reliance succeed in buying LyondellBasell? We probably won't know for a few months. At this point we don't even know if LyondellBasell's board will decide the sell the company.
Meanwhile, keep an eye on Len Blavatnik, the billionaire who put LyondellBasell together two years ago.
Experts and analysts seem to agree that combining Reliance and LyondellBasell makes sense. But that doesn't mean Reliance will overpay for the company, should it come down to a bidding war.
I missed it, but one of our reporters notes that plastics health and safety issues were highlighted in the B story on last night's episode of "The Simpsons."
Here's the context: Marge's attempts to placate the oversensitive mommies in her mommy circle ended with her making a non-fat, all organic muffins, only to have the mommies get enraged that she used Teflon-coated bakeware. Then they started to panic when they noticed a No. 7 resin code on the plastic sippy cups -- beware of bisphenol A!
Cue the other mommies going insane and taking their babies into a passing ambulance.
A.V. Club TV reviewer Todd VanDerWerff has this to say about the program:
I ... liked the B story, wherein Marge gradually became aware of all of the dangers she faced in junk food and common plastics thanks to a baby play group that Maggie was a part of. The show's portrayal of hyper-vigilant mothers who worry too much and the sorts of inane baby activities that occur at these groups was spot-on, and Homer and Marge's junk food binge made up for some of the sloppiness in the main plot.
Is "The Simpsons" dealing with BPA and fluoropolymer safety yet another sign that these issues are now in the mainstream public eye? I suppose so -- although I like to think that "The Simpsons," like Mad magazine, are always a bit more intellectually advanced than they appear.
I wrote about plastics companies using social media last week, so today let's tackle a related topic -- critics of the plastics industry using social media.
A reader suggested that I check out the entry for Polyethylene in Wikipedia. A section titled "Environmental Issues" says, in part:
The wide use of polyethylene makes it an important environmental issue. Though it can be recycled, most of the commercial polyethylene ends up in landfills and in the oceans (notably the Great Pacific Garbage Patch). Polyethylene is not considered biodegradable, as it takes several centuries until it is efficiently degraded.
The reader suggests that the author of that section "clearly [has] an anti-plastic agenda."
I'll say this -- there's an anti-plastics spin. That's also typical of many blogs and other social media sites that tackle plastics-related issues.
Sometimes these blogs have connections to mainstream media Web sites -- for example, check out the plastics-related posts in the "Julie's Health Club" blog on the Chicago Tribune's site. The Tribune connection certainly would tend to give this blog credibility, at least with some readers.
Does it matter when dozens of blogs highlight issues like phthalate and BPA safety, or marine debris? I think so.
Many of these Web sites come up pretty high in search engine results. So every time someone hears a rumor or sees a news report about plastics and the environment and decides to go online for more information, this is what they'll find. Likewise for students who are doing plastics-related reports and science fair projects.
The plastics industry can't wish away its problems -- or pretend that social media sites that highlight them (sometimes with an anti-plastics spin or agenda) don't exist.
A lot of plastics companies seem to be exploring social media these days. Interest in Twitter is growing, in addition to Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube ... you name it.
Acrilex Inc., a producer and distributor of custom-colored acrylics, announced a major social media initiative this week, include sites on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. The company hopes the platforms will help generate discussions on key trends with important customers including distributors and store fixture designers.
On a related front, Plastics News staff reporter Rhoda Miel wrote about a new iPhone app that DuPont Co. is using to reach out to designers, to let them know about available color samples in its Corian cast acrylic product line.
It takes time and effort for companies to create compelling social media sites -- I've seen plenty of blogs created by plastics companies wither after a few months, for example.
Still, there are a lot of exciting things happening. Some companies -- like Acrilex -- are jumping in with both feet, while many others are just dipping a toe in the water.
Three new technology forums at next year's Antec conference will explore ways to improve the environmental sustainability of plastics.
The half-day forums will begin at 1:30 pm on three successive days of the May 16-20 conference in Orlando, Fla:
On Monday, May 17, Polymer Applications for a Clean Environment. This symposium on plastics as keys to clean air and water. The moderators will be Sadhan C. Jana of the University of Akron; Prithu Mukhopadhyay of Ipex Inc.; and Vassilios Galiatsatos of LyondellBasell Industries.
On Tuesday, May 18, Successful Case Studies in Bioplastics. Presentations will focus on commercial bio-content applications, including film, fiber, and molded parts for use in automotive, building and construction, industrial, medical, and packaging markets. The moderators will be Maggie Baumann of G.H. Associates; and Roger Avakian of PolyOne Corp.
On Wednesday, May 19, Latest Developments in Non-Halogenated Flame Retardants. This forum will cover recent advances in technology and applications for mineral fillers such as alumina trihydrate, phosphorus compounds, antimony trioxide, borates, intumescent materials, nanocomposites, and other flame retardants. The moderators will be Baumann and Avakian.
Antec is organized by the Society of Plastics Engineers. For more information check www.antec.ws or www.4spe.org.
According to a news release, the hall of fame's purpose is to recognize individual leaders in the manufacturing community "whose vision, leadership, and legacy not only provided value to their individual organizations but also beneficially impacted the larger business community and our society."
During the span of their careers, these 10 leaders have helped to shape a historic and challenging era of change in the manufacturing enterprise. Companies have become increasingly global, sourcing their products across continents, seeking new markets in developing nations and welcoming talent from around the world. They have invested in new technologies that have made manufacturing operations faster, more flexible, leaner and more productive. At the heart of many of these changes has been unprecedented access to, and use of, communications and information technology, allowing component orders placed in Atlanta to be processed in Bangalore, manufactured in Shenzhen and shipped to Seattle with increasing precision, speed and clarity.
Lankton, Welch and Holliday are in good company -- others in the class include George David of United Technologies Corp.; Joseph Engelberger, the "father of robotics,"; William George of Medtronic; Andrew Grove of Intel; Lee Iacocca of Chrysler; Steve Jobs of Apple; and lean manufacturing guru James Womack.
Congratulations to all, especially the three with strong ties to the plastics industry.
Crates and pallets used to transport soda bottles and milk are apparently popular with some thieves, but the legal authorities in Maryland are on the case.
According to severalreportstoday that are very likely to be picked up in other news media, Prince Georges County State's Attorney Glenn Ivey and representatives from a Coca-Cola bottler and a Baltimore bakery today announced the indictment of five people suspected of stealing the containers from retail and industrial businesses.
Allegations of milk crate banditry aren't new -- I had a similar blog post back in 2007.
Just like the last time, the authorities in Maryland say the alleged thieves were selling the pallets and containers to overseas recyclers, who grind them and use the plastic to make new products.
The authorities claim that nearly $10 million in losses from plastic pallet theft have occurred in Maryland in the past year.
Really? $10 million in stolen plastic pallets? Sold to apparently unsavory overseas recyclers?
This just sounds too much like a bad script for "CSI New York."
The exhibit, dubbed Electric Avenue, will include advances in lighweight design and battery technology. It will include almost 20 vehicles, plus related symposiums and special events on an adjacent stage.
"We believe developing and commercializing next generation battery technology, for example, will help ensure the sustainability of the automotive industry while meeting the nation's energy and environmental goals and generating tens of thousands of green collar jobs in Michigan and throughout the nation," Dow's Heinz Haller, executive vice president for performance systems, said in a news release.
The auto show will be here before you know it -- the press preview starts Jan. 11, and the industry preview on Jan. 13.
I saw Nicholas Kristof's op-ed column about bisphenol A in The New York Times a few days ago, but I wasn't going to post a comment in the blog because he didn't appear to cover any new ground.
But it's noteworthy that -- to Times readers at least -- the column seems to be getting a lot of attention. The column has been hovering near the top of the newspaper's Web site list of most popular stories most of the day.
Since many readers look to Kristof for his opinion, here's what he has to say about BPA:
While the evidence isn't conclusive, it justifies precautions. In my family, we're cutting down on the use of those plastic containers that contain BPA to store or microwave food, and I'm drinking water out of a metal bottle now. In my reporting around the world, I've come to terms with the threats from warlords, bandits and tarantulas. But endocrine disrupting chemicals -- they give me the willies.
BPA safety is a pretty high priority issue these days -- not as "hot" as global warming, of course. But between BPA and marine debris, there's no doubt that plastics will continue to face plenty of legislative, and regulatory, pressure in 2010.
Indian chemical conglomerate Reliance Industries Ltd. is close to announcing a big acquisition, according to India's The Economic Times, and the target could be all or part of LyondellBasell Industries AF SCA, the world's largest polyolefins maker.
The financial press has already linked Reliance to a potential deal, although LyondellBasell has made it clear that it plans to exit bankruptcy in a few months and launch an equity offering sometime in 2010.
The story in The Economic Times does not quote anyone from Reliance confirming the news, but notes that its reporters talked to "people with direct knowledge of the deal."
ET spoke to a number of bankers and analysts to ascertain the possible size of the transaction. One banker said the transaction could be in the region of $6 billion and may include both the US and the European assets of LyondellBassell.
Will this deal get done? It's clear from this report, and others in recent weeks, that there are some negotiations taking place. But it is noteworthy that Reliance in the past has expressed interest in some big global chemical company assets -- remember its interest in GE Plastics?
Will this be the deal that Reliance actually delivers? It certainly does seem like a better fit.
Tim Hanrahan of Erema North America Inc. struck a nerve with his story about paying $345.39 to get four cases of Pepsi products delivered to his booth at NPE2009. But there's still someone defending that price tag.
Mary Kay Marquisos, a spokeswoman for McCormick Place, told ABC 7 in Chicago: "If you go to a routine vending machine it cost[s] you $1 to $2 to vend a soda bottle and then another $1.50 for staff to deliver to the booth. This price includes receiving, warehouse, staff and delivery. This charge is not dissimilar to what you would pay at a hotel or another convention center."
I thought about that comparison myself, back when complaints about McCormick first came to light after this year's show. Compare the cost of doing business at NPE to, say, the cost of ordering room service at a hotel in New York.
But a lot of NPE exhibitors aren't buying that explanation.
Today I traded emails with a longtime NPE exhibitor who says he knows no exhibitors who are in favor of staying in Chicago. (He asked, "Maybe I'm talking to the wrong people?" Maybe I am too, because I'm hearing the same things.)
He wants to be anonymous, so I won't include any details that will disclose his company, but he agreed to let me share his story:
I could go on and on, with the ridiculous stories of this past show's labor practices. The setting of some of my display items in the aisle, and the union telling me, "You only get one spot, if you want it moved (to inside my booth), you need to pay extra."
The Millrights union who stopped us from attaching a sprue picker to our machine. "You need 2 millwrights for that ... oh, and we need the riggers union to lift it up ... oh, and when you start running your machine, and it falls off because we didn't tighten the bolts, well you need to put in a work order for more riggers and millrights. And did you forget the electricians union to plug it into your machine?"
The union official who asked me what I thought I was doing, by trying to hang my own Velcro-backed signs to my display materials: "There's a decorators union for that, ya know."
And heaven forbid your crate which needs opening has been secured by both screw AND nails. The Millwrights we do the unscrewing, but the Carpenter's union handles the prying of nails.
We've heard such complaints before, typically after every NPE show. Is this reality, or are the stories exaggerated?
Hanrahan, whose letter was on the record, made a point of specifically saying that he thinks the traditional complaints about unions at McCormick Place are urban myths.
"I have not witnessed any of the rumored problems in the past regarding uncooperative workers, bribes or payoffs. I have found most of the tradespeople to be courteous and professional and, for the most part, qualified for the job," he wrote.
His problem focused on the cost of exhibiting. The now-famous "Pepsi incident" was just one example.
It's clear that many companies feel they'd get a better deal in Orlando.
For the past couple of days, I've been asking exhibitors this question: Traditionally, Orlando would not be a serious candidate even for a regional plastics show. Can exhibitors be serious about holding an international show in Florida?
One gave me this answer: "Surely, fewer people will come, but they will be better quality, and the return on investment will be better for exhibitors."
I'm still skeptical that Chicago can offer concessions that will make a difference.
If McCormick gives the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. a discount for NPE, won't all the other big shows (Pack Expo International, IMTS, the International Home + Housewares Show) demand the same deal?
These are the big shows that fill the hotel rooms with thousands of out-of-town visitors. If threatening to pull out of Chicago works for SPI, I expect they'll all do the same.
Still, Chicago just spent millions to build the new West Hall at McCormick Place. They can't just use it for local car and boat shows.
I still think Chicago will manage to keep NPE for 2012 and 2015. I personally like Chicago, and I think it's the best location in North America for an international plastics trade show.
But more than a few exhibitors believe they need to move the next couple of shows to Orlando -- and hope that Chicago eventually comes to its senses and reduces its costs, so they can go back to McCormick in 2018.
The lightweight Boeing 787 Dreamliner has experienced more than its share of delays, but that didn't stop the folks in Charleston, S.C., from celebrating the company's decision to make that city the site of a second assembly plant for the revolutionary aircraft.
The first assembly plant is in Everett, Wash., but Boeing says it needs a second line so it can eventually deliver as many as 10 of the wide-body jets per month, according to this story from The Seattle Times.
Although production of the 787 has been delayed several times, airline companies are eager to buy the Dreamliners because the revolutionary fuel-saving design.
Boeing already has a plant in Charleston where it employs 900 fabricating single-piece rear-fuselage barrels out of composites. The company also has an adjacent joint venture plant that employs 1,600 assembling the central fuselage, according to the story.
With the new assembly line, the company expects to add 3,800 new jobs in South Carolina.
That sort of investment will quickly make South Carolina a major force in high-tech composite plastic design and manufacturing.
Here's a sentence I never expected to write: actress Kaley Cuoco from TV's "Big Bang Theory" is partnering with the American Chemistry Council to celebrate the future of plastics in fashion.
ACC put out a news release on the partnership, and I have to admit I'm a little out of my element writing about plastics' impact on the fashion industry.
The announcement starts with the headline: "Plastic Is the New Black!" and notes that Cuoco will host the Oct. 29 Gen Art "Fresh Faces in Fashion" Los Angeles show.
"Plastics and couture might not seem like an obvious fit, but the fact is that plastics have played a very large role in fashion for decades," said Steve Russell, vice president of ACC's Plastics Division, in the release.
"Without plastic, we wouldn't have faux fur, and skinny jeans wouldn't have their stretch. Plastics also provide women with comfortable, smooth support under their favorite looks. We're thrilled to partner with Gen Art to highlight how plastics inspire designers' imaginations and allow artists to create pieces that are cutting-edge, on trend, chic, affordable, and even eco-friendly."
At the show, Cuoco will announce a fashion design competition that will challenge designers to create "two dynamic womenswear" looks made from fabrics that include plastic-based fibers. The winner will receive a $10,000 prize and a runway show at Gen Art's Fresh Faces event at Winter 2010 New York Fashion Week.
Will this type of event help improve the image of plastics, especially among the young millennial generation? Stay tuned.
As a footnote, I discovered a new ACC Web site through this story, PlasticsMakeItPossible.com. ACC uses that "brand" throughout the announcement, apparently assuming that its target audience still remembers the old American Plastics Council TV ads and radio spots that touted the benefits of plastics.
Recycling foodservice polystyrene products offers some unique challenges. The light weight of the PS foam is one of the biggest stumbling blocks, and so is contamination.
I remember interviewing the some leaders of the now-defunct National Polystyrene Recycling Corp. back in 1992. One told me that NPRC had spent $60 million between 1988 and 1992 to set up and promote its PS recycling infrastructure, and yet it had only managed to recycle about 35 million pounds of material.
Not exactly a great return on investment.
So I'm not surprised to see this story from the Oakland Tribune today, reporting that GB Industrial Materials Corp., the only company in the Fremont-Union City area to collect plastic foam for recycling, will no longer allow people to make drop-offs at its Union City plant.
"People leave all the garbage bags in our parking lot and on weekends. Many times we come in in the morning and are like, 'What is that?,'" owner Christina Liu told the newspaper. "We are short-handed. This is very labor-intensive work."
GBIM Corp. specializes in importing and exporting thermoplastics, including both virgin and recycled material.
The company wasn't alone -- the story points out that other companies that recycle PS foam are in Oakland, Redwood City and Stockton. Plastics Newshas written stories about successful PS recycling programs, as has our sister newspaper Waste & Recycling News. (Herearea few).
But with PS bans spreading across California (24 California towns and two counties have banned PS takeout packaging), the news that a drop-off program in one community is scaling back is bad news for the foodservice packaging sector.
Apple Inc.'s newest MacBook has a polycarbonate shell, and it's getting pretty good reviews. Considering that the company has been using aluminum for everything else, retaining PC for the entry-point laptop is worth noting.
We had a chance to play around with the laptop, and it's pretty snazzy for a hunk of plastic. The surface is super slick (AKA super fingerprint friendly), though the base of the laptop utilizes a soft-touch, non-slip surface that's nice to handle.
TUAW (The Unofficial Apple Weblog) and PCmag.com note that the new iBook features a unibody design similar to the more expensive MacBook Pro (which are aluminum).
Apple claims the unibody makes the MacBook lighter and more durable.
Apple also notes that the new laptops are PVC-free.
The energy-efficient MacBook joins the industry's greenest lineup of notebooks, with every Mac notebook achieving EPEAT Gold status and meeting Energy Star 5.0 requirements. The entire Mac notebook line now comes standard with energy efficient LED-backlit displays that are mercury-free and made with arsenic-free glass. Mac notebooks contain no brominated flame retardants, use internal cables and components that are PVC-free and are constructed of recyclable materials.
Blog readers will remember that BusinessWeek wrote a feature back in September about Apple's efforts to eliminate PVC.
The Automotive Division of the Society of Plastics Engineers today announced the finalists for its 39th-annual Automotive Innovation Awards Competition.
Maria Ciliberti of Ticona Engineering Polymers, and chair of the awards program, said despite the challenging year for the auto sector, the contest attracted more than 50 nominations, with entries that can be found on commercial vehicles produced on four continents -- North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
"Clearly, there is no shortage of innovative automotive-plastics applications being commercialized right now," she said in a news release. "Polymeric materials continue to bring value to molders, tier integrators, OEMs, and the ultimate customer -- the consumer."
Category and the event's Grand Award Winner will be announced on Nov. 12 during the Automotive Innovation Awards Gala in Livonia, Mich.
Here is a list of the finalists, by category, courtesy of SPE:
CATEGORY: Body Exterior
LOW-PROFILE OUTER-BELT WEATHERSTRIP DESIGN
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Taurus Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Cooper Standard
Material Supplier: ExxonMobil
Material: TPV
Process: Tri-Layer Extrusion
Description: These outer-belt weatherstrips are the first to provide a low-profile, tri-extrusion with stainless steel, TPV, and a high-gloss vinyl ionomer. The manufacturing process envelop was pushed to the maximum to satisfy the Taurus design theme, achieving a functional component that offers three different textures (low-gloss, high-gloss, and stainless) in the same part.
GLASS-RUN WEATHERSTRIP CORNER MOLD OVERLAYS
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Taurus Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Henneges / ITW
Material Supplier: DuPont Automotive
Material: 16.5 percent-GR PA 6/6
Process: Injection Molding
Description: These door glass-run weatherstrip corner mold overlays are an industry first, providing gloss and appearance differences to the glass seals while helping guide the glass properly into the top seal. A simple part that solves a big problem in an elegant way, the plastic glass-run corner mold overlays offer improved appearance and customized craftsmanship for window surroundings while ensuring a good seal.
EXTERIOR SPOILER WITH INTEGRATED CHMSL ASSEMBLY
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: 2009MY Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon
Tier Supplier/Processor: ABC Group
Material Suppliers: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: PC/ABS (with proprietary nanofiller package)
Process: Injection Molding
Description: Highly dimensionally stable, this thermoplastic Class A horizontal body panel meets stringent gap requirements by managing a low coefficient of thermal expansion (3.9) while also maintaining heat, impact, and surface quality for a highly aesthetic application. The center-high-mounted stop light (CHMSL) is also integrated in this first-surface part.
HEADLAMP BEZEL
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Taurus Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Ford ACH Lighting - Sandusky
Material Suppliers: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: PC (with metallic-pigment package)
Process: Injection Molding
Description: The inclusion of a special metallic-flake pigment package in the resin matrix for this application eliminated the need for paint while delivering improved styling aesthetics in an as-molded part.
CATEGORY: Body Interior
TUFTED PET AUTOMOTIVE CARPET - BODY INTERIOR
OEM: GM Holden
Make/Model: 2010MY VE Commodore Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Futuris Automotive Interiors
Material Supplier: Not stated
Material: Recycled PET
Process: Fiber Spinning
Description: For the first time, tufted PET carpeting has been used in an automobile. Containing 20 - 80 percent post consumer recycled content, and with the option to use 100 percent recycled PET, this tufted carpet meets or exceeds all major OEM carpet performance specifications, is 12-15 percent less expensive than traditional tufted nylon, and provides a sustainable solution.
PLASTIC POST-ISOLATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE HVAC BLOWER MOTORS
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Chevrolet Camaro Sportscar
Tier Supplier/Processor: Delphi
Material Supplier: Spartech Polycom
Material: 20 percent talc-filled PP
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This application uses an integrally molded plastic mount instead of multiple rubber isolators that softens and quiets HVAC fan-motor vibrations, resulting in significant reductions in cost and development time plus a quieter vehicle interior for consumers. A resonant frequency "tuning" feature allowed for noise/vibration/harshness (NVH) optimization even late in the vehicle-development cycle with minimum impact on mold tooling. Now bare motors can be purchased, allowing more motors to be shipped per container, and a quick snap-fit joins the plastic mount to motor, facilitating assembly.
MOLD & FOLD CLUSTER ATTACHMENT BRACKET
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2009MY Ford F-Series Pickup Truck
Tier Supplier/Processor: Automotive Components Holdings
Material Supplier: ATC
Material: 20 percent Talc-Filled PP
Process: Injection Molding
Description: Using "negative space" in the tool, this mold-&-fold cluster attachment bracket provides a mounting surface for the instrument panel's cluster without the necessity of adding an additional part. Cluster attachment locations are integrated into the IP substrate tool and the "molded-in hinge" is then folded into place. This allowed the styling team to maximize the size of register openings and the cluster lens by minimizing the design space between them.
LIGHTWEIGHT ACOUSTICAL HEADLINER BASED ON SOY FOAM
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Escape HEV & Edge and Lincoln MKX CUVs
Tier Supplier/Processor: Magna (Escape) & International Automotive Components (Edge)
Material Supplier: Woodbridge Group
Material: Polyurethane (with 10 percent-Bio-Based Polyol)
Process: Not stated
Description: Lightweight, open-cell acoustic foam based on polyurethane chemistry with some soy-based polyols (replacing petroleum-based polyols) were used in this application, which also featured permeable thermoplastic adhesives and permeable felt fabrics in the headliner construction. The result is industry-leading noise/vibration/harshness (NVH) performance and lower weight
CATEGORY: Chassis & Hardware
ELECTRIC POWER STEERING FLEXIBLE COUPLING
OEM: Fiat S.p.A.
Make/Model: 2010MY Fiat 500 Compact Car
Tier Supplier/Processor: Nexteer Automotive / Forteq
Material Supplier: DSM
Material: Heat-Stabilized, 50 percent-GR PA 4/6-
Description: This flexible plastic coupling for the vehicle's electric power steering replaced a similar stainless steel coupling with broached splines and grease. The part features ribs that connect and transfer torque from one rotating shaft to another, which in turn strokes axially and stretches and compresses the coupling. The fully complient constant-velocity joint eliminates torsional lash, the need for grease, and all sliding interfaces at a cost savings, while reducing audible interior cabin noise and improving steering "feel." The system replaces traditional hydraulic systems, reducing weight 17 percent, cost 50 percent, and increasing fuel economy by 4 percent. System performance and customer satisfaction were also improved.
LOAD-MANAGEMENT STRIKER CAP (LMSC)
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: 2009MY Cadillac CTS V-Series Luxury Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Delphi / Ammex Plastics
Material Supplier: BASF
Material: TPU
Process: Injection Molding
Description: When styling opted to add larger wheels/tires well into program development, this small thermoplastic urethane (TPU) load-management striker cap was designed to increase energy absorption by 74 percent and reduce loads on shock towers by 14 percent. This improved vehicle ride without the need to add extra structure to the body/chassis vs. standard nylon striker caps with a metal ring alone. The 43-g, high-elongation TPU part has a "springboard" effect designed in so it improves vertical impact management, leading to lower trim capability, better structural survivability, better energy management (via ride and handling), and enabling additional content (new wheels/tires) without adding significant cost or mass.
BELOW-BELT DOOR-GLASS RETAINING BRACKET
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Taurus Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Henneges
Material Supplier: Dow Automotive
Material: PA 6/6
Process: Injection Molding
Description: These nylon 6/6 below-belt door brackets are an industry first, replacing steel channels. The plastic channels will not ding the door outer panel during installation and provide quiet window-system operation, while also reducing weight 50 percent and cost 20 percent.
CATEGORY: Environmental
RADIATOR END TANK FROM RENEWABLY SOURCED MATERIAL
OEM: Toyota Motor Co
Make/Model: 2010 Toyota Camry Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: DENSO Corp.
Material Supplier: DuPont Automotive
Material: PA 6/10 (with monomer from caster bean oil)
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This is the first use of bio-plastic in a chemically aggressive and mechanically demanding application - in radiator end tanks. Roughly 40 percent of this new nylon 6/10 material is sourced from caster bean oil, reducing reliance on petroleum-based inputs and helping lower the vehicle's carbon footprint.
WHEAT-FILLED PP FOR QUARTER TRIM BIN
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010 FordFlex CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: International Automotive Components
Material Supplier: A. Schulman
Material: Wheat-Straw-Reinforced PP
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This is the auto industry's first use of renewable (and locally sourced) wheat-straw filler for storage-bin components. This natural-fiber-reinforced PP offers greater dimensional stability than unfilled resin and is more sustainable than talc-filled PP.
HALOGEN-FREE WIRE COATING
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: 2008MY GMC Yukon, Chevrolet Tahoe, & Cadillac Escalade SUVs
Tier Supplier/Processor: Delphi
Material Supplier: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: PPO
Process: Extrusion
Description: Flexible, halogen-free, PPO resin for wire insulation provides an environmentally friendly alternative to PVC and cross-linked HDPE. The durability and low specific gravity of the material enables thinner insulation and jacketing, allowing comparable performance to be achieved in less packaging space and at lower weight.
CATEGORY: Materials
MOLDED-IN-COLOR METALLIC INTERIOR-FINISH PANELS
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Mustang Sportscar
Tier Supplier/Processor: Ford Motor Co. / Summit Polymers
Material Supplier: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: PC/ASA
Process: Injection Molding
Description: Molded-in-color metallic finish PC/ASA replaced painted PC/ABS in this Injection-molded application, eliminating paint for greater sustainability while meeting tough weathering, scratch/mar, and low-gloss requirements. Optimized gating strategies and a modified pigment package were essential to minimize flow disruptions that can lead to dark streaks in molded metallic parts where flow-fronts converge. The result is the industry's first metallic-finish interior-trim panel, which is greener, increases customer satisfaction (by eliminating paint-related defects), and provides a $2.30 USD/vehicle cost savings
DOOR PANEL FROM NATURAL-FIBER PREG COMPOSITE
OEM: BMW
Make/Model: 2008MY BMW 7 Series Luxury Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Dräxlmaier Group
Material Supplier: BASF AG (resin) / J. Dittrich & Söhne GmbH (fiber mat)
Material: Acrylic Copolymer
Process: Compression Molding
Description: This lower door-panel inner was compression molded from a new, high-performance, lightweight, cost-effective, and green composite. The resin matrix is a unique acrylic polymer that is thermoplastic in its "B-stage," allowing for production of prepreg/semi-finished rollstock or blanks, yet cross-linking at temperatures above 120C to produce a very durable thermoset. The resin's high wetout of natural fibers and ability to form chemical as well as mechanical bonds to the reinforcement allows for production of composites with very-high fiber loadings - 70 percent in this application - yielding lightweight parts with high stiffness in thin walls. The resulting panel saves weight and cost, significantly reduces VOC emissions, and its rapidly renewable natural fiber needled mat reduces the vehicle's carbon footprint without sacrificing performance.
LONG-GLASS-PP FIRST-SURFACE CONSOLE SIDE PANELS
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Lincoln MKT CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Automotive Components Holdings
Material Supplier: Ticona Engineering Polymers
Material: 20 percent Long-Glass PP (Pelletized)
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This is the largest molded-in-color, long-glass PP part with a Class A surface out of the tool for a premium vehicle to date. The precolored and textured part is 100 percent color-matched, has no glass read-through, and offers higher stiffness than talc-filled PP and lower cost than ABS, while also eliminating the need for squeak & rattle countermeasures, saving $6 per vehicle.
CATEGORY: Performance & Customization
THERMOFORMED FULL-SIZE CARGO VAN PARTITION & CONSOLE
OEM: Various
Make/Model: 1985-2010MY Ford Astra & E-Series, Chevrolet Express & GMC Savana Cargo Vans
Tier Supplier/Processor: Chameleon 2000 / Advantage Plastics
Material Supplier: Primex Plastics
Material: Reprocessed ABS
Process: Thermoforming
Description: This large, thermoformed ABS partition and console closes off space between front and back of cargo vans, reducing workload on HVAC units, keeping exhaust fumes from the passenger compartment, and protecting passengers from flying or falling objects that could enter the passenger compartment from rear cargo space. The console provides a work surface between front seats, holding laptops, phones, and paperwork, and rear-accessible storage allows large parts to project into the underside of the console from the rear cargo hold. This application saves 100 lb vs. steel partitions while eliminating rust, quieting the passenger compartment, adding more functionality, and allowing significantly faster installation, making it ideal for fleet vans. The unit is fully recyclable and uses recycled material.
ILLUMINATED DOOR-SILL INSERT USING SINGLE-LED LIGHT ENGINE
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Mustang Sportscar, Lincoln MKZ & Ford MKT Sedans
Tier Supplier/Processor: Innotec Group
Material Supplier: Altuglas, SABIC Innovative Plastics, Serigraph
Material: ABS Bi-Laminate, Polycarbonate, & Acrylic
Process: Multiple
Description: Combining several different plastic technologies to create highly efficient optics that require only one LED light source, this illuminated door-sill insert can easily be customizable (via laser etching) to produce high-impact illuminated graphics. The system's unique construction allows the design to be adapted to new vehicles in weeks, not months, significantly reducing development costs. In addition, the application is the auto industry's first to provide multi-color illumination from a single LED light engine.
HIGH-TEMPERATURE CORED-CARBON COMPOSITE AIR SPLITTER & DIVE PLANES
OEM: Chrysler Group LLC
Make/Model: 2010MY Viper ACR Supercar
Tier Supplier/Processor: Prefix / Plasan Carbon Composites
Material Supplier: Evonik
Material: High-Temperature Epoxy
Process: Hand Layup / Autoclave Cure
Description: A unique carbon composite with a special high-density, high-temperature core capable of surviving autoclave temperatures and pressures was used to produce an extremely thin, lightweight, precision air splitter and set of dive planes for the 2010MY Viper ACR supercar. The splitter is adjustable and produces extremely high downforce resistance of 1,000 lb without deflecting more than 0.25 mm at 180+ mph. A fast-cure, UV-stabilized grade of clear epoxy resin (with visible carbon fiber weave on the surface) brings autoclave cycles down to an average of 10 min. The aerodynamic package went from concept to production in just 12 month.
CATEGORY: Powertrain
BLOWMOLDED INTERCOOLER AIR DUCT IN PPS WITH JECTBONDING
OEM: Volkswagen AG
Make/Model: 2008MY Volkswagen PQ35 Platform
Tier Supplier/Processor: Röchling Automotive Leifers GmbH
Material Supplier: Ticona Engineering Polymers
Material: Glass-Reinforced PPS
Process: Hybrid Injection/Blow Molding
Description: This is the first time glass-reinforced PPS has successfully been blow molded. The complex part was formed by a unique patented hybrid injection/blow molding process called Jectbonding, which allows functional elements to be injected against the parison during expansion, forming a chemical bond and yielding a robust part with a clean joint vs. welding the element to the part in a secondary step. Two different grades of glass-reinforced PPS were used. The process eliminates two previous production steps and provides extremely high repeat accuracy; high-performance PPS resin provides dimensional stability and outstanding mechanicals in high-temperature, chemically aggressive environments with cost and weight reductions.
PLASTICS-INTENSIVE FLUID FILTER MODULE
OEM: Daimler AG, Mercedes Car Group
Make/Model: 2010MY Mercedes C-Class Compact Executive Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Mahle Filtersysteme GmbH
Material Supplier: Lanxess
Material: 35 percent-GR PA 6/6
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This fluid module filters engine oil and cools it via cooling liquid. The cooling unit is fully integrated into a new plastic housing that provides 38 percent weight and 16 percent cost reduction and reduces pressure losses for higher engine efficiencies. The 35 percent-glass-reinforced nylon 6/6 shell covering the cooling unit serves to stiffen the filter housing against oscillation. A plastic hose replaces rubber for further cost savings.
OIL PAN OPTIMIZED FOR STONE IMPACT
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY 6.7L Power-Stroke Turbo Diesel
Tier Supplier/Processor: Dana
Material Supplier: BASF
Material: Impact-Modified, 35 percent-GR PA 6
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This is the first plastic oil pan designed for full exposure to the road environment and optimized to withstand road chemicals and stone impacts thanks to a new material / ribbing configuration. An impact-modified 35 percent-glass-reinforced nylon 6 provides excellent impact strength even at -40C and is not affected by calcium chloride thanks to a proprietary modification package. A special waffle-design ribbing pattern can handle multiple impacts (unlike earlier plastic designs with sacrificial ribs). Another unique aspect of this oil pan is that it features the first plastic drain plug, which sports a cam-lock design that makes it impossible to over-torque and break the plug's screw threads. The oil pan is 2.1-lb lighter than the steel pan it replaced and 30 percent less costly. It has an noise/vibration/harshness value similar to that of cast aluminum and quiet steel, yet will not rust or corrode and provides better protection against stone impact than metal designs
HIGH-FEATURE V6 RIGHT & LEFT-BANK TIMING-CHAIN TENSIONER ARMS
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: GM HFV6 Engines
Tier Supplier/Processor: Cloyes / Mayfair Plastics
Material Supplier: DSM
Material: Unfilled & 50 percent-GR PA 4/6
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This application features the first thermoplastic timing-tensioner arms, which replaced cast aluminum. The parts meet high-performance engine dynamics and sustain chain tensions up to 3,000 N. A heat-stabilized, 50 percent-glass-reinforced grade of nylon 4/6 provides high strength and stiffness at 140C. It also offers extremely high fatigue resistance at elevated temperatures, extreme wear resistance at pivot and tensioner piston interfaces, long-term property retention in oil, impact strength, dimensional stability, and a low coefficient of linear expansion, plus high knitline strength at the pivot. A separate unfilled nylon 4/6 wear surface is also used. The system provides 30 percent cost and 20 percent mass savings vs. previous metal designs, eliminates the need for a hardened-metal wear pin, eliminates 5 machining operations/part, provides tooling savings of $200,000 USD/year, and is quieter.
CATEGORY: Process / Assembly / Enabling Technologies
TWO-SHOT INVISIBLE PASSENGER-SIDE AIRBAG DOOR
OEM: Hyundai Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2009MY Hyundai i20 Supermini Car
Tier Supplier/Processor: Hyundai-Mobis / Hyundai-Motor Co.
Material Supplier: Multibase Co.
Material: TPO (door) & Talc-Filled PP (IP substrate)
Process: Twin-Shot Injection Molding
Description: This soft, seamless passenger airbag (PAB) door is integrally molded into a hard instrument panel substrate using a simultaneous twin-shot molding process and two grades of olefins: talc-filled PP for the IP and a TPO grade for the door itself. This system provides a simple, uncluttered appearance and color harmony while eliminating fit & finish issues and providing improved cold-temperature impact strength. Both design and materials optimization was required for success and the final system - which is covered by seven tooling and materials patents - provides better performance at a $5 cost and 500-g weight reduction, while significantly reducing molding and assembly operations.
AUTOMOTIVE PLASTIC-CASE RADIO WITH INSERT-MOLDED EMC SHIELDING
OEM: General Motors Co.
Make/Model: 2009.5MY ChevroletTahoe/GMT900 Family
Tier Supplier/Processor: Delphi E&S
Material Supplier: MRC
Material: Reprocessed 16 percent-GR PC/ABS
Process: Insert Injection Molding
Description: This application features an innovative, patented method of embedding EMC shielding into an environmentally friendly plastic case, enabling significant reduction in weight and assembly time. A metallic-mesh Faraday cage is insert molded into the reprocessed 16 percent glass-reinforced PC/ABS material. The design also enables the use of slide lock & snap lock design features that speed assembly while, eliminating the previous sheet-metal case and 29 screws. The resulting unit provides significant weight reduction, assembly cost & time savings, with improved physical and EMC shielding and a more sustainable product.
MOLDED IN FAUX STITCHING WITH NEAR-PERFECT APPEARANCE
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2010MY Ford Taurus Sedan
Tier Supplier/Processor: Ford Motor Co. / Automotive Components Holdings
Material Supplier: BASF
Material: Polyurethane
Process: Spray Polyurethane
Description: The realistic appearance of a hand-wrapped leather insert with French and Coach seams was achieved on this door panel using a single-piece molded spray polyurethane part without need for separate operations. The realistic appearance of leather stretching, bunching, and stitching is achieved via a silicone mold cast from leather originals. Each of the vehicle's four door panels retains its own unique bunching and stretching pattern, yet each panel is absolutely repeatable vehicle-to-vehicle. The result is a $50 USD/vehicle cost savings, better quality, perfect repeatability, and greater durability.
CATEGORY: Safety
GENUS FOLDING HEAD RESTRAINT
OEM: Kia Motors
Make/Model: 2010 MY Kia Sorento CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Gill Industries / Sturgis Molded Products
Material Supplier: BASF
Material: PA 6
Process: Insert Injection Molding
Description: This is the first folding-headrest system for stowable rear seats that is fully compliant with new FMVSS 202A and EC standards. The integrated system makes use of toughened, glass-reinforced nylon 6 to reduce overall part count by 50 percent, lowering weight by 2.5 kg, and simplifying manufacturing and installation.
PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION BUMPER-REINFORCEMENT EA SYSTEM
OEM: Ford Europe
Make/Model: 2009MY Ford Kuga Compact CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Plastal Germany
Material Supplier: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: PC/PBT
Process: Injection Molding
Description: An innovative energy absorber (EA) design mounted on the grille-opening reinforcement instead of cross-car beam enabled this vehicle to be the first in the SUV class to meet tough European pedestrian-protection requirements for lower-leg impacts, eliminating the need for a separate EA in front of the bumper beam. An unfilled PC/PBT resin was used to injection mold this EA/upper reinforcement, providing best-in-class performance and allowing for the vehicle's aggressive styling due to a reduction in packaging space.
PEDESTRIAN-PROTECTION-COMPLIANT FRONT FENDER
OEM: Ford Motor Co.
Make/Model: 2008MY Ford Kuga Compact CUV
Tier Supplier/Processor: Montaplast
Material Supplier: SABIC Innovative Plastics
Material: MPPE/PA
Process: Injection Molding
Description: This is the first SUV with thermoplastic fenders that meets tough European pedestrian-protection requirements for head impact in a single part, eliminating the need for secondary bracketry under the fender as in steel designs. The MPPE/PA material is online paintable, dent and corrosion resistant, a unique styling enabler, and reduces both weight and cost by 50 percent vs. steel. The vehicle was also able to qualify for a better insurance rating because of this innovation.
Will the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. vote to move the NPE 2012 and 2015 shows to Orlando, Fla.? Or will Chicago manage to keep the show in McCormick Place?
Plastics Newsbroke the story on Friday about the two cities courting SPI's Executive Board at SPI's meeting in Arlington, Va.
Today the Chicago Tribune weighs in, with a follow-up story headlined "Chicago in battle to keep plastics trade show."
According to the story, "A revised proposal from Chicago at the 11th hour forestalled a vote on whether to move the triennial show to Orlando starting in 2012. ... Chicago's last-minute revisions were 'significant enough' that the trade group's board didn't take a vote Oct. 16, as had been expected."
This is an issue that many within the plastics industry have very strong feelings. So far we've heard from a few who like Orlando.
Herb Hutchison of Global Advantage Group LLC posted this comment on our story minutes after it was posted:
Chicago has held this show hostage and has been very inflexible to exhibitors in the past. Why would we expect anything different in the future? It is time to move on, Orlando would be a much more friendly enviornment for both exhibitors and attendees.
Over the weekend, Walter Cornell of Up and Running add this post:
As an installer of plastics machinery, I know what hassles and costs Chicago levies on attendees when setting up their displays. I've know of union workers living out of state that fly into McCormick to work this deal. It's that lucrative, for them and costly for attendees. Florida is a right-to-work state so unions don't control Orlando's impressive and sparkling convention center.
Orlando has lower cost hotels within walking distance (no more bus/cab waiting lines) and with low cost airfares, international and domestic direct flights, people especially internationals, would want bring the whole family and enjoy the world famous attractions like Kennedy Space Center, The Golf and Beaches and of course Disney's Epcot SPI exhibit.
The world has changed, now it's time for a NPE change, let's try something new.
I've also heard from NPE exhibitors -- and attendees -- who think SPI should stick with Chicago.
Some think the flirtation with Orlando isn't really serious. They believe SPI is just trying to play hardball with Chicago, and win some concessions before going back to McCormick Place.
Well, SPI, I think you've got Chicago's attention. Now you're faced with a pretty big decision. What's it going to be -- Mickey's playground, or City of the Big Shoulders?
Bill Caudle, a former raw materials coordinator at a plastics compounder, recently made a huge career change -- at age 39, he joined the US Army.
The reason for the decision is the interesting part of the story. Caudle was laid off from his job at PolyOne Corp.'s Sussex, Wis., plant, and he couldn't find a job with health insurance benefits.
Insurance was essential because his wife, Michelle, has ovarian cancer.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel posted a heart-tugging feature story yesterday about the Caudle family's story.
"The Army would solve their health coverage problem," the story says. "In years past he would have been too old, but in 2005 the age limit for enlistment was increased from 35 to 40, and a year later it was raised again to 42. The tradeoff would be his absence from home," including his wife and three children.
So on May 13, his 39th birthday, Bill signed up for a 4-year hitch in the Army.
In the end, although he risked leaving Michelle to fight cancer on her own, Bill chose the Army. He signed on for a job as a signal support systems specialist, a soldier who works with communications equipment.
"Seventy percent of the reason is for the insurance," said Bill's mother, Marguerite Hemiller. "He told me, 'I've always wanted to do something for my country and I have to help Michelle.'"
That couldn't have been an easy choice, especially for a family man with a wife battling through chemotherapy.
The plastics industry in West Virginia contributes $2.2 billion annually to the state's economy, according to a new report that's getting a lot of attention in the Mountaineer state.
West Virginia's plastic industry, directly and indirectly, accounts for more than 22,630 jobs, $1.19 billion in employee compensation, $2.2 billion in economic activity, and pays more than $178 million in state taxes.
75 percent of its customers located out-of-state.
Polymer companies pay pay among the leading salaries in the state. Plastic industry wages average $54,000, which is more than one and one-half times the state average wage of $37,000.
The fact that West Virginia is home to some big resin plants -- think Bayer MaterialScience LLC, DuPont Co. and Sabic Innovative Plastics, among others -- certainly helps raise that average wage figure.
Politicians are paying attention to the report. Gov. Joe Manchin told the paper: "The plastic industry in West Virginia is both robust and diverse and is an economic engine for the state of West Virginia. This is a high-tech, high-wage industry that sells its product all over the globe."
Having good, up-to-date information on the plastics industry's economic impact is essential to getting attention from politicians, especially on the state and local level.
Hats off to the Polymer Alliance Zone for helping raise the profile of West Virginia's plastics sector.
What's your company's carbon footprint? How about your suppliers' footprint, and your customers'? That's not a front-burner issue for most North Amerian plastics processors -- yet -- but it's getting a lot of attention in Europe.
Let's look at a couple of recent columns that touch on the subject.
First, Carl Mortished of The Times in London writes about how Western Europe is losing heavy industries -- including resin manufacturing -- in part because of efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
"Billions of dollars of potential investment in heavy industry, notably refining and petrochemicals, is moving east in search of lower costs -- and carbon trading is making the money drain flow faster," Mortished writes.
"The popular prejudice in Britain is that chemicals is a sunset industry, an embarrassing industrial legacy that soon will be buried by the service sector and some fanciful 'green manufacturing,' powered on alternate Wednesdays by windmills. For decades our government has condoned this nonsense, but the truth is that chemicals is big business for Europe. The European Union runs a huge trade surplus in chemicals, €37 billion in 2007 -- more than €70 billion, if you include pharmaceuticals.
"Unfortunately, the surplus is gradually shrinking. Asia, which for many years was a net importer of chemicals, is now in balance and is moving into surplus. China, with the assistance of American and European petrochemical companies, is building plant to satisfy domestic demand. In the Middle East, meanwhile, they have been building export industries -- manufacturing bulk plastics and oil products for export to Asia and to Europe. They are building scale while we are shrinking."
Mortished laments that Western Europe will still need chemical products in the future, but instead of making them locally, they'll be buying them from "an Indian manufacturer fuelled by a dirty coal or diesel generator [that] ... can sell his plastics at rock-bottom prices in the EU."
He adds: "We still need the products, but someone else will make them, out of sight and out of mind."
Chris Smith, editor of our sister publication European Plastics News, addresses a different carbon dioxide-related issue in an opinion column that Plastics News reprinted in its Oct. 12 issue.
Smith notes that "an increasing number of plastics producers and users today are boasting that their products are made from renewable sources or contain renewable material. The question is: What exactly does this mean? And what should it mean?"
One problem, Smith says, is that companies are focusing too much attention at the renewable or bio-based content of their materials.
"Focusing on material content alone overlooks the energy used in production. Is a polymer made from renewable resources using non-renewable energy necessarily better than one made from non-renewable resources using renewable energy? And what of recycling? Focusing on the source cannot differentiate between virgin and recycled material.
"These are difficult issues to resolve. We need clear standards to ensure that manufacturers' environmental claims can be validated. But those standards must inform rather than misinform -- we cannot expect every consumer to read the small print."
Smith and Mortished each raise some issues that are important to the long-term future of the global plastics industry. Some within the industry already doubt that the answers to the questions will favor petrochemical-derived plastics.
Congratulations to material supplier Lubrizol Corp. and packaging injection molder Weatherchem Corp., which were recently named to the NorthCoast 99 "Great Places to Work" in northeast Ohio.
The NorthCoast 99 is given annually to employers that have an "exceptional commitment to creating positive, supportive workplaces that recruit and retain top talent." The awards are sponsored by the Employers Resource Council.
Among other things, Weatherchem was honored for "improving energy efficiency and environmental sustainability -- Weatherchem strives to be a more environmentally sustainable company, with such methods as using new energy efficient presses and chillers, a company-wide recycling program, and focusing on ways to reduce scrap material and waste."
Blogs are buzzing with reports that blame America's obesity problems on plastic. And why not? No one wants to hear that they're overweight because they eat too much or spend too much time watching TV.
Blumberg's list of Obesogens includes bisphenol A -- not a surprise since previous studies have suggested a link between endocrine distruptors and obesity.
Plastics are just the latest item to take the blame for America's obesity. The Treehugger blog even has a "What makes you fat" section of its Web site devoted to posts on all the studies about products that make us look and feel like the Pillsbury Doughboy.
Among the other culprits: Cars, suburbs, the recession, where you live, cheap gas, and architecture.
BusinessWeek posted a feature today on Apple Inc.'s efforts to catch up to other computer makers on the sustainability front.
Plastics Blog readers will be most interested in what the story has to say about PVC. Here's an excerpt that the story has under the subhead "Eliminating PVC and Other Toxic Materials":
Apple is also winning kudos for an intensified effort to eliminate toxic materials. While many tech companies have promised to stop using particular commercial compounds that include bromine and chlorine, Apple two years ago began requiring suppliers to prove that their products included none of these chemicals at all. That required a major investment, says COO [Tim] Cook, including hiring chemists to help suppliers come up with alternatives. Take PVC, the additive that gives computer cables their flexibility. To avoid using the material inside its products, Apple came up with a "special blend" of polyester.
Meantime, while both Dell and HP had promised to stop using PVC by the end of 2009, both recently said the goal was impossible because of a lack of commercial substitutes. Yet Apple met its target of 2008 for the innards of its devices, and sources say future products will ship with PVC-free power, mouse, and monitor cords. "We report what we've done, while others set goals they can't meet -- and then they're let off the hook," gripes Apple Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer, noting that Dell and HP rank highly in a recent green list in Newsweek.
Apple may be anti-PVC, but it's not anti-plastic. Numerous blogs, including Gizmodo, are reporting today at the computer maker is preparing to introduce a polycarbonate-body MacBook later this year.
Toyota Motor Corp. plans to pool resin purchasing among its group firms, according to a report in the Nikkei (7203.T) plans to consolidate purchases of resin materials among group firms to cut costs and strengthen its bargaining power, according to a report in the Nikkei business daily.
Citing the Nikkei report, the Reuters wire service noted that Toyota "will bundle its purchase of polypropylene, which is used in bumpers and other vehicle components, beginning this fiscal year."
The report says Toyota spends about $2.24 billion to buy 500,000 to 600,000 tons of resin a year. PP accounts for about 40 percent of the total.
Other big OEMs handle resin purchasing, but it's not strategy that's been universally adopted. Are any blog readers aware of either drawbacks, or cases where centralized purchasing has worked out well?
Critics of taxes on plastic bags may argue that they have no environmental benefit, but that's not stopping Ireland's environment minister.
John Gormley said Sept. 23 that he will introduce a bill later this year that would double Ireland's tax on single-use plastic bags to 0.44 euros (59 U.S. cents).
According to this report, Gormley spoke at an environmental conference in Dublin, where he said the tax initially was met with resistance, but now has proved "hugely popular."
A spokesman for the minister said raising the tax will "ensure that there's a sufficient deterrent against people moving back to plastic bags."
Ireland was a pioneer in taxing plastic bags. It originally put a 0.15 euro tax on bags in March 2002.
Opponents of bag taxes had better bone up on reasons why taxes are a bad idea. (The American Chemistry Council has a list here).
Because once politicans settle on something that they can tax -- especially if they think the tax will actually be popular -- you can be sure that they'll keep going back to that well.
Sabic Innovative Plastics LP plans to keep its world headquarters at 1 Plastic Ave. in Pittsfield, Mass., according to this story posted today on The Berkshire Eagle's Web site.
According to the story, Sabic IP started to consider either "reducing the footprint of its facility on Plastics Avenue, leasing another building from the city, or building anew in Pittsfield" back in December, when it laid off 40 of its 300 employees.
The Eagle's story quotes company spokeswoman Jodi Kennedy saying the decision to stay up follows several months of "consideration and analysis."
Sabic IP wasn't really looking at moving outside the area -- top officials previously had pledged to stay in Pittsfield. The only question was whether it would move -- and possibly downsize -- the global HQ in Pittsfield.
Kennedy told the newspaper that Sabic IP's decision to remain on Plastics Avenue is "an affirmation of our commitment to the Pittsfield community."
A couple of Hall of Famers -- one from plastics, one from the NFL -- are part of a new private equity firm that is on the hunt for middle-market leveraged buyouts.
Jon Huntsman Sr., the founder and former chairman of Huntsman Corp., is the plastics guy. The football Hall of Famer is former San Francisco 49er Steve Young. Also on the team is Robert C. Gay, the former managing director of private equity player Bain Capital. The name of the new firm is Huntsman Gay Global Capital LLC.
According to this San Jose Mercury News story, Huntsman Gay has $1.1 billion that it plans to invest in companies in companies with $20 million to $100 million in annual sales.
This information kit from the company (PDF) adds that the fund will look primarily in the United States for buyouts, and will "continue to follow the proven methodologies of the Huntsman Corp. and Bain Capital."
Neither the Mercury News story nor the Huntsman Gay Web site mention plastics as a specific target for the new firm. But both Huntsman and Bain have been players in the world of plastics M&A. So it wouldn't be a big stretch to assume that the new firm will eventually end up with some polymer-related assets.
Once you make possession of PVC pipe a crime, only criminals will have PVC pipe ... right?
Maybe not.
Remember the blog post back on Aug. 7 about Pittsburgh making it against the law to have PVC pipe in public places? The city passed the law in advance of next week's G-20 summit meeting, to stop people at protest rallies from linking themselves together in tough-to-break formations.
Apparently police are taking the law seriously. According to this report from Pittsburgh's ABC affiliate WTAE, police have visited Redzone Robotics twice in the past few weeks, confiscating 60-foot-long PVC pipe in an alley where the firm does test work.
Redzone doesn't plan to use the pipe to make "sleeping dragon" protest formations -- they use it to test robotic pipe inspection equipment.
Plastics help Abbott make packaging more sustainable
Abbott Laboratories is on its way toward a goal of cutting the packaging used in its key products by 5 percent by 2013. Yesterday the Abbott Park, Ill., company gave a progress report on its sustainable packaging efforts.
Abbott said it is implementing more than 40 sustainable packaging initiatives, which emphasize "use of lighter and sustainable materials in package design."
Based on that definition, it's no surprise that plastics are playing an important role.
The company cited one example: its Abbott Nutrition unit reduced the amount of plastic in its 8-ounce re-closable bottles by 8.3 percent.
"Through better design, the company cut polypropylene plastic usage by 2.7 million pounds annually. The reduced-weight bottles also will help save 436,000 gallons of gasoline used for transportation per year," the company said.
Abbott said since 2007, it has eliminated an estimated 2.88 million pounds of packaging on an annualized basis, the equivalent of preventing 15,000 pounds of polystyrene foam from going into landfills.
The post, titled "Recycling Plastic: What a Waste," ties together a couple of issues -- concerns about chemicals including bisphenol A and phthalates, and litter-related issues including marine debris.
I thought it was worth sharing the column so Plastics Blog readers can see what she thinks of industry efforts to fight plastic bans and taxes by pushing for more recycling:
The [American Chemistry Council] spends millions to defend the chemicals produced by their members to make plastics. They have hired the same advisors who defended the tobacco industry to formulate a strategy to promote and defend the petrochemical industry. If measured by the difficulty in passing legislation to curtail SUPs [single-use plastics], and the positive press generated on the issue of plastic recycling, the strategy seems to be working.
At the center of ACC's strategy is its promotion of recycling as the solution to plastic pollution. This band-aid approach allows the industry to look environmental while continuing with business as usual, making SUPs out of virgin -- not recycled -- petrochemicals. The ACC knows well that only 5-7 percent of plastics are recycled, and that this figure will probably not grow substantially.
However, SUPs, the majority of plastics, are not designed to be recycled. Instead, SUPs are designed and promoted to be used on the go, and to be dumped whenever and wherever their contents are consumed. Even if SUPs are discarded into a recycling container, they are often contaminated by food waste and rendered unsuitable for recycling, or made of a type of plastic that have no recycling infrastructure. Spending relatively little on promoting recycling plastics offers a big public relations payoff with no real threat to an industry that earns billions pushing SUPs as the foundation of our throw-away consumer culture.
The ACC also knows that even if more plastics are recycled, there is not a big market for recycled plastic. It is usually cheaper for manufacturers to use virgin petrochemical material. Furthermore, the downgraded recycled by-product is routinely sent overseas to China, where it may also end up in a dump or incinerated, after the most recyclable fraction is "cherry picked" out. In short, recycling will never put the ACC members out of business.
Boyle calls ACC's effort a "cynical strategy." Her description sounds awfully cynical to me. There is a big, healthy market for recycled plastics (North American recyclers often complain that they can't get enough raw material). Recycled plastics are rarely more expensive than virgin resin.
I agree that recycling won't put ACC members out of business -- but is that really the goal? There's a place for virgin resin, and a place for recycled resin. Often the materials compete. Sometimes I'm frustrated when I see virgin resin win markets that seem natural for recycled plastics. But that's a matter of consumer preference, not chemical industry conspiracies.
Boyle didn't say this, but I will -- some industry-sponsored efforts to boost recycling have been too weak. But the plastics industry doesn't deserve all of the blame for standing in the way of good ideas like bottle deposits. Grocers, soft-drink companies and water bottlers have been the roadblocks.
That's another column ... but perhaps it's time for ACC and others in the industry to realize that plastics will continue to shoulder the blame for litter and marine debris problems because the plastics industry hasn't done enough to push its customers to take more responsibility for single-use disposables.
The column concludes by urging readers to refuse to use single-use plastics. Boyle writes: "Instead, bring your own shopping and produce bags to the market. Use reusable bottles. Bring your own containers for take-out or ask for non-plastic disposable packaging."
Nothing wrong with that. In fact, some consumers seem to be catching on to the "use less stuff" lifestyle -- just check the latest trends in bottled water sales for proof.
DuPont Co. economist Robert C. Fry Jr. has some good news in his quarterly economic forecast -- the recession is over.
"The worst global recession since World War II has come to an end in most of the world," Fry wrote in the Sept. 3 report.
"The recovery from the current global recession is likely to be weak by historical standards - due to ongoing deleveraging - but might still be stronger than many forecasters expect, especially if the massive global fiscal and monetary stimulus is effective. The fear of a double dip or W-shaped recession, perhaps caused by defaults on mortgages on U.S. commercial real estate, is not currently being validated by leading indicators."
Here's what Fry has to say about U.S. plastics processing:
"Industrial production of rubber and plastic products, which fell 22.4 percent from November 2007 to May 2009, rose in both June and July. Recovery is expected to continue going forward"
...and for suppliers:
"The chemical industry trade balance has returned to surplus in recent months as Asian demand for U.S. chemicals has rebounded."
Anecdotally, I've noticed more stories about companies investing in new (and used) equipment in recent weeks, and fewer about firms filing for bankruptcy or going out of business.
There's one notable exception: Whirlpool Corp. on Aug. 28 announced that it will close its Evansville, Ind., plant by mid-2010, eliminating 1,100 jobs, and shifting the work to Mexico. We haven't seen the plastics-industry fallout from this decision yet, but it might be coming.
"Owning an artificial Christmas tree is healthier for the environment over a 10 year period than using real trees," the association reports. "The environmental study found that a consumer using an average artificial Christmas tree has a significantly smaller carbon footprint than a consumer using average farm-grown Christmas trees."
My typical tree-acquisition strategy was singled out as the worst of all:
"The study also indicated that driving out to a tree farm and cutting down a tree is the worst environmental choice you can make when buying a Christmas tree and that it's substantially better for the environment to buy a tree from a local retailer rather than to drive out to a farm, due to the incremental fossil fuel consumed."
I guess the association doesn't realize that I live closer to Christmas tree farms than to local retailers.
Anyway, let's take this report with a grain of salt. First, let me repeat my standard complaint about lifecycle analysis -- they always seem to favor the companies sponsoring the report. And how can anyone judge competing environmental claims without making subjective decisions about which criteria are most important?
Remember the Water Cube, the cool-looking National Aquatics Center at the Beijing Olympics? A new rail hub in Anaheim, Calif., will feature some of the same materials, including a roof made of lightweight ethylene tetrafluoroethylene foil.
The material is helping architectural firm HOK design the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (yes, it's really called ARTIC) with a goal of achieving a LEED Platinum rating from the U.S. Green Building Council.
According to a news release from HOK, the building will incorporate "solar panels, ETFE cushions -- a highly insulating enclosure system one-tenth the weight of glass -- and a solar water heater built into the roof to reduce energy use, water use, solid waste production and carbon emissions."
The new transportation hub is scheduled to break ground in 2010 and be completed by mid-2013. Phase one is estimated to cost $180 million. When it's finished, it will connect local entertainment and sports venues including the Anaheim Convention Center, Angel Stadium, Disneyland and Honda Center.
The Los Angeles Times' Culture Monster blog has an interesting story about the ARTIC, including some impressive-looking artist renditions of the finished building. Check it out -- and thanks to our long-time correspondent in California, Roger Renstrom, for suggesting this post.
Project Kaisei, one of this summer's missions to study the plastics vortex in the Pacific Ocean, is on the way back to California.
Dennis Rogers, a marine educator who has been blogging from the trip, notes that he saw "exactly what I expected to see: the plastic was about in the concentration that credible media had reported."
I've seen beautiful sunrises give light to shocking areas of plastic accumulation, held handfuls of plastic particles filtered from the surface of the ocean, and shared the simple joy of sailing while storytelling with ocean enthusiasts from around the world. You do not need to sail to the middle of the Pacific to know what to do about plastic in our oceans, in our streams, and on our shores, but sailing to it makes the message even more compelling.
Most people reading this blog know the personal solution already; Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Many of us have found new ways to live with less stuff; how to make things last; and how to properly dispose of what we use. If you have done this, you know that we are all works in progress and that it's only with constant attention to details that one can succeed. On the other hand, how do you make a whole culture pay constant attention? It seems that, while we've been chanting, "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle," somehow our throwaway culture has marched forward unaware.
I share his frustration, and I'm sure many Plastics Blog readers do, too. As I've pointed out before, many people in the plastics industry consider themselves to be environmentalists. They may have a bias toward plastic products, but that's understandable. Plastics offer many advantages to the sustainably minded: energy efficiency and light weight (which saves on transportation costs) are in the forefront, but so is recyclability.
But now there's so much plastic floating in the Pacific Ocean that, in a single summer, we have multiple scientific missions exploring the problem. Something must be done to get more people to change their behavior. They've got to start to recycle, or at least properly dispose of plastic waste. If they don't, the problem will keep getting worse, and the industry will face more solutions that it finds distasteful -- bans and taxes.
So the question is, how best to change human behavior, and discourage the throwaway culture that Rogers laments? I hope his voyage helps, and I applaud him for focusing attention on the problem.
Yesterday we blogged about the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's story that criticized the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s social media-based Internet campaign, which it compared to tobacco industry lobbying efforts.
The story noted that SPI President and CEO Bill Carteaux "declined to be interviewed," but it quoted a speech that Carteaux gave at NPE2009.
For the record, here's a copy of a statement from Carteaux that SPI says it gave to the Milwaukee reporters prior to publication of their story. The statement was not included in their report:
"As you know conversations about plastics are already taking place in print, broadcast and online media as well as in town halls and state legislatures and in online forums and blogs. SPI: The Plastics Industry Trade Association is committed to developing and maintaining an open and transparent dialogue about the safety of products and their relationship to the economy, the environment and a sustainable future.
"Simply put, the goal of SPI's proposed consumer outreach campaign is to join the existing conversation about plastics with key stakeholder audiences -- including millennials, industry employees, policymakers and the media. Since we have not yet started the program, there is little to report at this time."
I still question how SPI handled this. The Journal Sentinel has taken a high profile in environmental journalism circles for its coverage of bisphenol A safety.
If SPI wants to be a player in the game of public opinion, it needs to step up the effort.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel continued its special report on the chemical industry this weekend with a story that takes a critical look at the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s social media-based Internet campaign aimed at the millennial generation.
On the Web, the story features a big photo of SPI President Bill Carteaux (although the story notes that he declined to comment). It describes SPI as a group that "represents manufacturers of thousands of products made with BPA."
To translate that, let's note that bisphenol A is a feedstock used to make polycarbonate, and that some -- but certainly not a majority -- of SPI members use polycarbonate.
The report quotes from a June video of Carteaux, apparently from his speech at NPE2009. Here's the nut graph -- the part of the story that sums up for readers the essence of the news:
The industry has launched an unprecedented public relations blitz that uses many of the same tactics -- and people -- the tobacco industry used in its decades-long fight against regulation. This time, the industry's arsenal includes state-of-the-art technology. Their modern-day Trojan horses: blogs, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia and YouTube.
The story claims several times that the plastics industry is following the same playbook as the tobacco industry in managing public and regulatory concerns about product safety.
"If I hadn't studied how this industry has operated in the past, I would say I was shocked," Rosner said. "But this attempt to deflect and distort public opinion is par for the course. They will ultimately do virtually anything to protect their product, even attack the messengers."
He added: "We're watching a propaganda campaign in the making."
I question why SPI didn't talk to the Milwaukee reporters for this story. Perhaps they didn't think they'd get a fair hearing.
Now that the tobacco industry comparison is on the table, I expect SPI will respond.
A few readers suggested that we blog on this story today, including one who wrote: "Had I not found this article on a local TV channel's Web site, I would have guessed it was April 1st of maybe somebody was playing a joke on the Web site's news editor. I am so embarrassed to be from Missouri right now. This would be funny if it were not so absurd."
Chris Blank, who covers state government and politics for the Associated Press, discovered that lawmakers got confused when they tried to pass a law making it illegal for boaters and river floaters to float inexpensive polystyrene coolers full of beer and other adult beverages on Missouri's rivers.
The problem occured because they knew that it was wrong to call the coolers Styrofoam -- that's a trade name for a specific product.
But they didn't know the name of the actual material they were trying to regulate.
So the law, as passed, says it's illegal for folks to use polypropylene containers on the rivers.
Of course no one actually does that, so that part of the law is moot.
I presume the local law enforcers can spend their time on the other parts of the new law -- bans on beer bongs, alcohol funnels and containers that hold more than 4 gallons of alcohol.
Violators face a fine of up to $1,000 and a year in jail.
Actually, that probably makes more sense than putting people in jail for a year for floating a foam cooler on the river, doesn't it?
Some pundits seem to think it a case of the American Chemistry Council throwing a million dollars in advertising at the city and duping the voters.
Others say it was an ill-conceived proposal that voters -- even in Seattle, a city with a reputation for support for environmental causes -- couldn't stomach.
I thought it would be fun to share some opinions from a variety of sources:
Frankly, Seattle, a plastic bag fee is a no-brainer, and it is proven to work. The cost is low enough to be a nominal dent in your wallet, and the fee can simply and easily be avoided with a few reusable bags. The arguments against it--the cost, the "wrong approach," fear of misused funds--just seem flimsy.
There are some things Europe just does better, and sometimes this has to do with perceived "rights." Americans believe they have a right to a free bag. Here, when it comes to the environment--be it car emissions, closing the center of a city to traffic, or plastic bags--the laws are just passed. Because these small changes are for the greater good.
It was a costly and unnecessary tax. ... I think you saw Seattle voters saying this was not the right approach to protecting our environment.
Adam Parmer of the Coalition to Stop the Seattle Bag Tax FromThe Seattle Times
Residents clearly expressed that a tax was not the way to go. The message it sends to us is that consumers value plastic bags and have rejected the idea of paying a fee for something they value and already use responsibly.
Steve Russell, vice president of plastics for the American Chemistry Council fromPlastics News
It wasn't the American Chemistry Council but the stable poor and newly unemployed taking an unsustainable hit in the current economic downturn who decided this was one tax/fee too many. What used to be chump change now gets us through the day. The mayor and his advisors targeted hapless users of the reusable plastic and paper totes instead of requiring manufacturers of toxic carryalls to come up with an eco-friendly product. The mayor hoist himself on his own petard by his arrogant disdain for the people with no voice. He never stepped up to the plate in defense of Jane and John Doe paying increasingly higher costs of food, rent and public transportation, failure to oversee due maintence of the infrastructure and suffering massive job losses. He dessicrated entire neighborhoods by confiscating private properties for a monorail that never was and ignored the voters who trekked to the polls four times to support the project. It's time the grinch who stole Christmas exit the stage gracefully.
I didn't see much of a campaign myself [in favor of the proposal]. And when it became visible, it was whining about the petrochemical industry. It seems like at the end, it was more about who was opposing it than dealing with some of the issues raised.
Political consultant Blair Butterworth fromThe Seattle Times
Nanny legislation, in all forms and at all levels, is a pernicious evil and must be eliminated.
It is not the government's responsibility to manage the lives of its citizens. If I choose to use canvas bags, or if a grocer opts not to offer plastic/paper, that is my (or their) choice.
Although this may be an important societal issue, I see no reason to codify it in law. Not everything has to be a law.
I count this as a win for the big, polluting plastic and chemical companies. All this claptrap about hurting the poor is a ridiculous argument. If you're poor, how many bags full of groceries are you going to be buying in the first place? Even if you have five bags, that's an extra buck. Big deal.
I don't know why the city council didn't just ban plastic bags and leave it at that. They overplayed their hand by putting the fee on paper, too. Paper is at least a renewable resource, and it's much less environmentally destructive.
Oh, well. We use canvas bags anyway. I'm just sorry to see the outcome of this vote.
Latest problem for plastics -- it doesn't last forever
All along we've been reading about how plastic marine debris will float in the ocean for centuries, killing wildlife and causing havoc.
Now the latest problem is that the plastic won't last forever -- it's degrading faster than scientists expect, and the chemicals being left behind will kill more wildife and cause more havoc.
The news comes from a widely-covered speech by Katsuhiko Saido, a chemist at Nihon University in Chiba, Japan, who led a team of scientists that looked at the marine debris problem. Saido spoke this week at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Washington.
According to a report from National Geographic News, the team collected ocean water samples from around the world and found that they all contained derivatives of polystyrene.
The toxic compounds the team found don't occur naturally in the ocean, and the researchers thought plastic was the culprit.
The scientists later simulated the decomposition of polystyrene in the sea and found that it degraded at temperatures of 86 degrees Fahrenheit (30 degrees Celsius).
Left behind in the water were the same compounds detected in the ocean samples, such as styrene trimer, a polystyrene by-product, and bisphenol A, a chemical used in hard plastics such as reusable water bottles and the linings of aluminum cans.
The National Geographic News version of the story is one of the more complete that I've seen. It notes that water temperatures in much of the ocean are much cooler than 86 degrees Fahrenheit.
A few weeks ago, if someone had told me that scientists had discovered that plastic marine debris was breaking down in the ocean, I would have thought that was good news.
Apparently I would have been wrong.
Really, the best solution to this problem is to stop creating marine debris in the first place -- and to work toward a solution to clean up what's already out there.
The Seattle Timestook a look at the early returns and pronounced that the referendum and pronounced that it "was being resoundingly defeated."
The Seattle Post-Intelligencernoted that as of 8:20 p.m. local time, the "no" votes were leading 58 percent to 42 percent.
The PI report also quotes pollster Stuart Elway saying that "Seattleites certainly have demonstrated a willingness to raise their own taxes for a variety of programs they deemed worthy. Plus, Seattle and the Northwest people generally want to do their part to help save the environment. So I think the question is whether voters think this measure is really going to do enough to help solve a real problem vs. the amount and impact of this tax."
Looks like a victory for the American Chemistry Council and its Progressive Bag Affiliates group, which lobbied hard against the bag tax.
Even here in the polymer valley, plastic products sometimes can't win the battle against other materials. The Akron (Ohio) Beacon Journal has a story today on how local grocery chain Acme Fresh Market Inc. is ending a 4-year experiment with plastic shopping carts and going back to metal.
President Steve Albrecht told the newspaper: "In the winters, they get so cold and the plastic gets brittle. We've had a number of them crack and break and the wheels don't hold up. The ice with the salt that we have in the parking lot, that corroded some of the wheels."
He added: "Our customers did like them very much, but they just weren't able to hold up."
Like everything else that can't stand Ohio winters, the plastic carts are moving South -- but not to Florida or Myrtle Beach. The best of the carts have been shipped to the Acme store in North Canton, Ohio, where they'll spend the next couple of years, presumably golfing every Wednesday and enjoying early-bird-dinner specials on Friday nights.
Don't plastic shopping cart makers offer a cart that can stand up to Ohio weather?
The Star-Ledger in Newark, N.J., has a feature story about the dispute -- Wang had a mansion in Short Hills, N.J., and many of the Formosa Plastics operations in the United States are headquartered in Livingston.
According to the Star-Ledger story, Wang never completed a will, and now his nine children can't agree on who should control the estate. On Thursday, one of his sons, Winston Wen-Young Wong, plans to ask a Newark Superior Court to designate him administrator.
If this case goes to trial, be prepared for enough personal intrigue to keep a team of soap opera writers busy for the next year.
National Public Radio's "All Things Considered" is doing a series this month called "How green Is It?," which is taking a closer look at things Americans are doing because they believe they help the environment.
On Friday, the focus was on reusable bags, which some grocery chains -- and some communities -- are encouraging shoppers to use instead of the traditional paper or plastic.
To start, environmental consultant Catherine Greener points out the differences among reusable bags.
Last year, Wal-Mart started selling a black bag that was made entirely from recycled bottles. Now, it offers a cheaper blue bag that is thinner and uses less plastic. On the other hand, however, only a third of the plastic in the new blue bag is recycled. And, it lasts only about half as long as the black one.
"I think we are living in the land of confusion right now as we migrate through what is less bad into what is truly good," Greener says. "This is an evolving and a moving target."
That's a problem with lifecycle analysis. In the end, deciding what's best requires some assumptions. What should manufacturers optimize? Carbon footprint? Recyclability? Recycled content? Not everyone is going to agree.
In the end, deciding between paper, plastic and resusable bags isn't going to make a lot of difference for the environment, according to Bob Lilienfeld, editor of the Use Less Stuff report (which touts lifecycle impact studies on its home page).
In the big picture, he says, the big fuss around shopping bags is really just a distraction.
"The bag is not the environmental bogey-person that everybody thinks it is," he says. "If you look at the entire grocery package that you bought, the bag may account for 1 to 2 percent of the environmental impact.
"The other packaging may account for 7 percent. Ninety percent is accounted for by the products you buy. That's where all the environmental impact is."
Thanks to blog reader Andrew Peacock for pointing out the NPR story. He called the report "refreshingly balanced." Let's watch the "How Green Is It?" series for more plastics-related topics.
The St. Petersburg, Fla., Times, has an interesting Q&A interview with Lisa P. Jackson, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Here's the question, and answer, that caught my eye:
[Q:] In 1999 the Clinton Administration's EPA sued Tampa Electric Co. over air pollution from its coal-burning power plants, forcing it to switch to cleaner-burning natural gas. Now your agency is trying to steer utilities away from fossil fuels entirely.
[Jackson:] Burning natural gas for baseload power is like burning your antique furniture in the fireplace. There are so many other things you can use it for that are more constructive (including paints, fertilizer, plastics, antifreeze, dyes and medicines). The problem with moving the industry to renewable resources, though, is that renewables aren't cost-effective yet. But if we grow the industry right, then we can make sure we dominate the manufacture of renewable energy components.
If Obama's policy is to discourage burning natural gas to generate electricity, and using it instead as a feedstock for products including the items that Jackson listed, that sounds like good news for the North American plastics industry.
Sure, it's a potential restriction on PVC, but it's not what you think ... Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl is preparing legislation aimed at banning people from carrying PVC pipe into public places.
According to this story from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the effort is aimed at stopping people at protest rallies from linking themselves together in tough-to-break formations.
Protesters frequently use PVC pipe adorned with big signs as a shield to keep police from pushing into the crowd with shields and batons. Other tools of the trade, according to the story, include handcuffs, locks and wire.
Councilman Patrick Dowd told the newspaper that he has a lot of questions, noting that if the city can't bar people from carrying concealed guns, "How can you restrict somebody from carrying PVC?"
Dow Chemical Co. played a role in former President Bill Clinton's trip to North Korea this week to secure the release of American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee.
According to this story from The Washington Post, Dow provided the corporate jet that took Clinton from his home in Westchester County, N.Y., to Burbank, Calif., where he transfered to a plane owned by Hollywood producer Steve Bing.
Ling and Lee worked for a Current TV, a media company led by former Vice President Al Gore and former U.S. Senator Joel Hyatt.
According to news reports, the journalists thanks Dow and its Chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris for their role in the mission.
Dow posted a brief news release on its Web site with a statement from Liveris:
"Dow is appreciative of the opportunity to provide assistance in support of the release of
Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee, by providing aircraft support. The Dow plane was used in different parts of the mission in recent days.
Dow is grateful that Ms. Ling and Ms. Lee are back home safely and we were honored to contribute to President Clinton's humanitarian mission to obtain their release."
Ling and Lee were jailed for four months for allegedly entering North Korea illegally.
Many of the reports, like this one from Minnesota Public Radio, just give the anti-PVC side. There's no hint that not all experts agree that buying your kid a colorful vinyl book bag is hazardous to their health.
So I thought it was noteworthy that this report from Ontario actually tried to add some context to the story.
Along with the "PVC is bad" message, the reporter also interviews Keith Solomon, an environmental biology professor from the University of Guelph, who notes that PVC poses little risk in such products because they are not consumed.
Even though the anchor concludes with a rhyme that implies that only certain types of plastic are safe, I doubt that most reports on the subject will be this balanced.
Natural England, a state-backed conservancy agency, introduced a plastic beehive in London today, designed to encourage city-dwellers to keep bees in their gardens or on rooftops.
The plastic hive, called the Beehaus, certainly looks cool. Perhaps the photogenic nature of the story -- the colorful hive, the active bees -- explains why it is getting so much attention in the U.K. media today, including the BBC video posted below.
I have a friend who has been beekeeping for a couple of years, and he seems to enjoy it. Based on his comments, I know that beekeeping takes training. It's not as simple as buying this plastic box and setting it up in your backyard.
But if this attract more fans to the hobby, that's good.
I never would have thought of making a plastic hive. Just when you think that all the material replacement opportunities for plastics have been done, up pops another one.
The trustees released a statement that said, in part: "It is disappointing that some family members have chosen to take their personal unhappiness with the late Mr. Smith's estate plan to court. Before Mr. Smith died in 1997, he very clearly decided that control of the company he had built over so many years should be left in the hands of trusted associates who would see to it that the company, the people who work for it and the communities that benefit from its presence are preserved, strengthened and grown for future generations, including his descendants."
According to the petition, the book value of the company and its subsidiaries was $267 million at the start of 2008, but it has dropped significantly because of the troubles in the auto industry.
Ah, the joys of running a family business. I bet this eventually gets settled out of court ... and that family reunions, weddings and holidays will be quite strained for a long time.
The Progressive Bag Affiliates unit of the American Chemistry Council is spending $500,000 to fight a referendum that would tax disposable shopping bags.
This Seattle Timesstory notes that PBA's contribution is the single-largest for a local ballot-measure in recent history, according to Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission.
The vote on the referendum is scheduled for Aug. 18.
It will be interesting to see how Seattle voters react -- will they agree to fight the 20-cent-per-bag tax? Or will there be a backlash against the PBA effort?
Keep California Beautiful is attracting some attention with its first new public service announcement in three years, a catchy TV spot with a 1960s theme that urges people to take responsibility for the marine debris problem.
The spot isn't preachy -- it tackles the subject with humor, with a group of teens singing and dancing as they trash the beach.
Our sister magazine Advertising Agehas featured the spot, and today The New York Times has a story about the effort.
Even if you don't live in California, don't be surprised if you see the PSA. According to the NYT story, Keep California Beautiful has given the new spot to Keep America Beautiful to use in other states beaches.
California's Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee, in three separate votes on July 15, voted 7-0 not to list bisphenol A on the state's list of toxic chemicals under the voter-approved Proposition 65.
Environmental groups and consumer health advocates that were lobbying to put BPA on the list consider the votes a minor setback. The Los Angeles Times' Greenspace blog quotes one saying "We see the decision as basically a speed bump on the way to banning a chemical that we think people should not be ingesting, especially pregnant women or infants and toddlers."
Even Dorothy Burk, chairwoman of the committee that voted in favor of BPA, told the Times in a phone interview: "I think if I had a baby I probably would try to use glass."
Not exactly a ringing endorsement of polycarbonate.
There definitely has been more critical coverage of this issue in the news media in recent weeks, with more experts questioning the importance of placing restrictions on BPA.
If one company uses recycled content to make a product, and another makes the same product out of a bioplastic, which item is more sustainable?
It's a matter of opinion, of course. But until now, my opinion -- or yours -- was just as as valid as any other.
Starting July 16, there will be a new standard.
That's when Wal-Mart Stores Inc. will unveil its long-awaited sustainability index, which will use life-cycle assessment to to measure the environmental impact of all the products it sells.
This will likely have major impact on some plastics markets, including packaging and housewares.
But keep in mind that the changes have already started to occur in those markets, since Wal-Mart has been talking about sustainability with its suppliers for several years.
Christopher Steiner, an Evanston, Ill.-based senior staff reporter at Forbes magazine is getting attention this week for his new book, "$20 Per Gallon: How the Inevitable Rise in the Price of Gasoline Will Change Our Lives for the Better."
This topic is interesting, entertaining, and more than a little frightening. Change can be scary. But Steiner is taking an "Always look at the bright side of life" attitude about high fuel prices that's sure to attract attention from journalists.
Perhaps Steiner is taking the whole every-cloud-has-a-silver lining concept to an extreme when he says:
We've grown used to engorging ourselves on the back of cheap oil and it has lead to all manners of problems. As the price of gas goes up, we'll live closer to work, school, eat healthier foods and even be skinnier and safer. The book profiles research that connects cheap oil to America's obesity rate and to the daunting numbers of people that die on our roadways. As the price of gas goes up to, say, $6, we'll save more than $30 billion on obesity-related diseases, 10,000 fewer people will die in car crashes and thousands of people will be spared heart attack deaths related to air pollution. Those kinds of effects will only be magnified as the price of gas rises further. And that's just a sampling of the benefits.
Steiner emphasizes that $20-per-gallon gasoline lies "far ahead in the future." But he adds that some of the changes he predicts -- such as the collapse of the airline industry -- may occur much sooner.
It's hard to predict when prices will rise or fall, let alone how much. Is it too soon to think about how plastics companies -- and their customers -- will be impacted by super-high fuel prices?
Plastics can still be traded electronically, but would no longer be traded in LME's ring sessions, which allow for more transparency of pricing.
Reuters quotes LME CEO Martin Abbott: "Plastics is coming off the floor ... they are not trading on the floor basically."
Mo Ahmadzadeh, president of Mitsui Bussan Commodities Ltd., added: "It doesn't surprise me because there was nothing going through on the floor. ... I would assume 90 percent was done online."
"There is no point having a floor session if no one is doing anything. They can always bring it back to the floor."
LME has offered plastics futures since 2005. LME officials have often described interest in trading plastics as low, but growing.
Bundanoon, a town with about 2,000 residents in New South Wales, is in the spotlight today, as it can claim to be the first town in Australia -- perhaps in the world -- to ban bottled water.
The town, which is about 2 hours from Sydney, had a community vote with about 400 people participating. Only two voted against the ban.
It will now be illegal for shops to sell bottled water. The town will install water fountains on main street "so people can fill their bottles for free," according to this story from London's Telegraph newspaper.
"Visitors to the town will also be discouraged, but not banned, from drinking bottled water," according to the report.
So what'll it be, Bundanoonans? Water fountains, a Coke, or a Foster's?
If you're planning a garage sale this summer, are you aware that the government wants you to research the products that you sell to make sure they don't contain recently banned chemicals like certain phthalates?
The story notes that Washington made it illegal last year to sell recalled products, including at yard sales and flea markets.
"The Consumer Product Safety Commission, which is charged with enforcing the law, is urging consumers who buy and sell products at garage sales to research the goods and make sure they're are safe," the story notes. But don't expect the FBI to bust your garage sale. "We're an agency that has a certain number of employees," CPSC spokesman Scott Wolfson told the WSJ.
Wolfson added that "it doesn't take much work to know that a product was recalled," and said the agency is offering consumers guidelines for how to avoid reselling products that have been recalled.
But, obviously consumers aren't going to be able to tell if an old toy contains di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, dibutyl phthalate or butyl benzyl phthalate. Most people can't even tell (or even care...) if a product is made of vinyl, polyurethane, silicone or rubber. And it's unrealistic to expect consumers to go online and try to figure out if every item they plan to sell at a garage sale is "legal."
I think the best that CPSC can hope for is to convince some people to avoid buying and selling old toys at garage sales.
Otherwise, they'll be headed toward a life of crime, destined to tear the tags off their mattresses and cross the street against the light.
BASF Corp. has a series of monthly podcasts aimed at answering questions about chemistry in everyday life. Today's item answers the question, "What are sponges made of?"
The 4 minute audio report is a little silly, but perhaps aimed at children. It explains the history and science of sponges (did you know that traditional sponges are animals, not plants?), and how modern artificial sponges improve on nature's design.
Interesting idea. I wonder about the format -- is audio the best way to tackle this kind of information, rather than video or text? Are other companies making efforts to reach consumers through basic informational messages about chemicals, including polymers?
Are biodegradable plastics a "silver bullet, silver lining, or none of the above?" That's the question the Environmental Protection Agency plans to address in a July 16 Webinar, "Biodegradable Plastics: From Cradle to Cradle."
Can an ad campaign make millennials love plastics?
The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s $10 million social-media ad campaign is generating some attention, including this video interview posted today on AdAge.com, the Web site for our sister publication Advertising Age.
SPI President and CEO Bill Carteaux explains how the ads will focus on the benefits of plastics, and how SPI will attempt to reach an audience of young people who may already have preconceived opinions against plastics.
The off-camera interviewer is Robert Grace, Plastics News' editor and associate publisher -- he did the story at NPE2009 in Chicago. For more PN videos from NPE, including a similarly themed interview with American Chemistry Council's Steve Russell, check out the video page on our Web site.
Salon.com has an interesting feature today about museums struggling to preserve plastic art objects that are starting to fall apart as they age.
Early polymers including cellulose acetate, cellulose nitrate, PVC and polyurethanes are all featured, and curators are struggling with ways to keep important objects from flaking, discoloring, or simply falling apart.
As of today, most chemical damage to plastics is irreversible, and conservators focus less on rehabilitation than simple maintenance. The Smithsonian Air and Space Museum recently asked the Museum Conservation Institute to help preserve a high-altitude flight suit in its collection. The suit had belonged to the one-eyed aviation pioneer Wiley Post. The leather straps and cotton garments in Post's suit look fine, if a little dingy. But his plastic gloves look like the shriveled hand of a mummy. Conservation scientists said even light handling of the gloves would cause them to crack and crumble, and they admitted they can do little but put the suit in deep-freeze storage and take pictures for posterity.
One branch of the art industry that has taken a particular interest in the question of how to preserve plastics is insurers, since they will have to pick up the tab for damaged goods. Insurance agencies fund much of the research into preserving plastic art, a fledgling science aching for a breakthrough. One company, AXA Art Insurance, publishes a book with the dour title Plastic Art: A Precarious Success Story, and has held numerous training sessions to teach curators the best-known methods of staving off decay (and, it hopes, to generate new ideas on how to reverse it). In a warning to museums snapping up the work of some of today's hottest artists, the AXA book states that plastic-heavy pieces by Damien Hirst, Matthew Barney, and Jeff Koons will be "difficult, costly, and nerve-racking to preserve."
The story notes that in the future, museums may be reluctant to display or share plastic holdings, and curators worry about this generation of artists using biodegradable plastics that won't stand up to years of display.
It's interesting how museum curators are struggling to preserve plastics, while others -- concerned about issues like marine debris and litter -- are trying to deal with issues created by plastics' durability.
I've seen a few stories in the past week about a company in England that has a prototype of a washing machine that uses nylon pellets to clean clothes.
The company Xerox Ltd., says the "virtually waterless" technology saves up to 90 percent of the water used in a conventional machine, plus it cleans faster and uses less detergent.
According to the stories, the technology was developed by Professor Stephen Burkinshaw from the University of Leeds, who discovered that certain types of polymer beads could be used for cleaning. The pellets can be reused, and when they've reached the end of their useful life as cleaners, they can be recycled.
Xeros hopes to have the machines on the market by the end of next year. It's nice to see plastics playing a role in a new product that has such strong green credentials.
Andrew Winston, a nationally recognized expert on green business, says he heard the sound of "taps" being played for the plastic shopping bag last week.
Since so much of the plastics industry's efforts have gone into fighting legislative initiatives against plastic bags, it's interesting to note that Winston thinks that retailers' decisions to reduce bag use are just as significant.
Winston writes on The Huffington Post blog today about a meeting that he attended in Brazil with Wal-Mart Brazil and all of its suppliers. The meeting wasn't just about plastic bags -- it was a wide-ranging discussion of Wal-Mart's sustainability goals.
He notes that the company used the meeting to unveil a big national campaign, in cooperation with the Brazilian government, to drastically reduce plastic bag use. Wal-Mart's goal is to reduce bag use 50 percent by 2013. In Brazil, they are participating in an television ad campaign featuring a popular musician with the slogan "Saco E um Saco," which translates as either "A bag is a pain in the butt" or "A bag sucks."
"Either way, it's a funny, yet aggressive way to get people to stop using these things," Winston notes. "All companies should take note of this kind of coordinated effort by governments and other companies -- imagine what happens if your product, manufacturing process, or sourcing strategy ends up on the societal bad list."
"Bags are not the only products facing this kind of challenge -- it's happening to bottled water as well. But nothing compares to the coordinated global attack on plastic bags. Once your product is declared a pain in the butt, where do you go from there?"
The Wall Street Journalhas a story today about how the latest delay in the commercialization of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner "highlights the engineering, manufacturing and maintenance issues" associated with carbon-fiber-reinforced composite parts.
"Boeing's stumble is striking because in the past, concerns with high-tech composites generally have focused on the manufacturing challenges of turning out ever-larger composite parts with extremely tight tolerances," according to the report.
This time, maintenance issues are key, because structural experts are having trouble predicting how composite parts will wear.
As the transportation industry considers ways to reduce weight and improve fuel economy, these challenges are going to become pretty commonplace. Engineers and designers won't be able to throw more steel at a structural problem to make a part work -- not with ambitious fuel economy standards and the drive to reduce the sector's carbon footprint.
It's probably a good time for young people to consider careers in mechanical engineering and industrial design.
Where exactly is the global economy right now? In a trough? Starting to recover? You know the joke: Ask a couple of economists, and you'll get a couple of opinions.
But here's a ray of sunshine: DuPont Co.'s Robert C. Fry Jr. highlights the state of the economic recovery in his newest business development report, released today. The news for manufacturers is especially postive.
"Evidence is growing," he wrote, "that the U.S. economy is at or near a business-cycle trough." But for manufacturing, the economy may be poised for a nice rebound.
"The schedule for U.S. motor vehicle production ... argues for a June trough, at least for industrial production. Vehicle production has been slashed this year to the lowest levels since 1958, as General Motors and Chrysler have shut down plants as part of their restructuring, but production is scheduled to surge in the third quarter. Production will still be far below pre-recession levels, but the jump in seasonally-adjusted motor vehicle production from June to July will be huge, and given the importance of this industry as a source of demand for other industries, total U.S. industrial production is likely to rebound as well."
Fry also notes that the recovery has already begun in some of the developing countries of Asia and in Brazil, and that it is especially strong in South Korea and Taiwan.
NPE attendees will remember that the 2000 show took place just as the U.S. manufacturing sector hit a peak. Will NPE2009 be remembered as the show that started a long, strong recovery? Let's hope so.
The Baltimore Sun newspaper editorialized today against a proposed 25-cent tax on plastic and paper grocery bags, arguing that it "smacks of a tax on the poor in the middle of a recession."
The column notes that the proposed tax is deliberately high to encourage residents to buy and use reusable bags instead of single-use bags.
The Sun thinks encouraging residents to recycle bags is a better idea.
Baltimore should take steps to reduce the number of disposable bags its residents use. The city should encourage merchants to give a rebate to people who bring their own bags, and officials should amend Baltimore's single-stream recycling program so that it, like some suburban counties, accepts bundles of used plastic bags. The city should also require that all grocery stores have recycling bins for bags.
It is certainly unsightly to see plastic bags blow in the breeze, get caught in tree branches or float through the Inner Harbor. But that's not a good enough reason for Baltimore to lead the nation in enacting what could become a significant and regressive tax increase.
According to the story, Toronto's City Council won the legal authority to do things like tax grocery bags as part of a 2006 law passed by the province of Ontario, which permits the city to enact any bylaw as long as it is related to the "economic, social and environmental well-being" of the municipality.
But the story notes that with the bag law, Toronto became "the first municipality in Canada to pass a law that dictates part of the business relationship between two other parties."
So, if the plastics industry decides to challenge the law in court, would it stick? The answer isn't clear.
The story notes that courts have given cities leeway in passing laws for the general public good. But it also cited a Supreme Court of Canada decision in 2001 that permitted a town in Quebec to ban pesticides, but said there are limits to municipalities' powers.
It will be interesting to see if Canada's plastics industry -- or some of its bag suppliers -- decide to test the law. A suit could discourage other communities from passing similar laws. But a losing case could open the floodgates.
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act still isn't working
Toxicologist Tim Zacharewski, a professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Michigan State University, submitted this op-ed column on the impact of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) on the plastics industry as it relates to the new phthalates regulations.
If confirmed, Zacharewski notes, Tenenbaum will inherit the responsibility of implementing this controversial new law and oversee the review processes of phthalates and other plasticizing alternatives.
What follows is Zacharewski's column:
This week, the Senate will hold a hearing on the confirmation on Inez Tenenbaum as Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). If confirmed, she will inherit some of the trickier issues associated with the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), which went into effect earlier this year.
The CPSIA was passed by Congress last summer in an effort to increase chemical regulation on toys and children's products. But the law is having a negative impact on businesses, including manufactures of vinyl plastic toys and children's items.
Most problematic is that the CPSIA imposed an interim ban on the manufacture and sale of certain plastic softening agents called phthalates until a comprehensive review is conducted by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Phthalates include several different compounds with different characteristics and toxicity profiles. The CPSIA specifically bans three low molecular weight (LMW) phthalates from use in toys but exercises constructive caution in its treatment of three high molecular weight (HMW) phthalates (DINP, DIDP and DnOP).
The law puts an interim ban on DINP, DIDP and DnOP, which are not deemed to be harmful in most circumstances. These compounds have been proven safe by multiple government and independent evaluators including the CPSC and the National Toxicology Program (NTP). But there are serious consequences of banning a safe substance -- even temporarily. Although the objective of the CPSIA was to protect children against dangerous chemicals, it may actually expose them to toxic alternatives by requiring manufacturers to use untested substitutes. In banning a thoroughly tested and safe class of chemicals from children's toys, plastic toy manufacturers are left with no choice but to use substitute chemicals with uncharacterized health risks that have not been tested or approved by any U.S. government agency.
Government scientists from the Consumer Product Safety Commission have testified to Congress that plastic toys made with these phthalates presented no health risk to children. Moreover, in a recent report featured on National Public Radio, CPSC scientist Marilyn Wind spoke for the agency when she said "We could not ban DINP because there was no risk of injury to children." Ironically, in order to lift the temporary ban now in place, DINP and other phthalates will undergo another Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) review that will be organized by the Commission Product Safety Commission.
The incoming chairman to the COSC will be tasked with the responsibility of ensuring the CHAP review process on these chemicals is carried out in a timely and effective manner. It is crucial that the Commission expedite the review process for phthalates and alternative plasticizers, as use of untested chemicals in products is not only a hazard for children, but creates uncertainty for businesses.
It will be important for any new CPSC chairman to be educated thoroughly on the science of phthalates and to recognize the different characteristics and toxicity profiles of phthalates. DINP is a phthalate that has been previously approved and tested by the CPSC. Consequently, before banning a tested chemical with a history of product safety, it would be more appropriate to establish the toxicity of untested substitutes.
USA Today's Open Road blog today reports on the growing use of bioplastics in the automotive industry -- a trend we've been following for some time.
It's nice when the mainstream press discovers a story like this, although I have to note that blogger Chris Woodyard couldn't help but make a joke at plastics' expense:
In the lexicon of famous oxymorons, the auto industry about to add another: ecological plastics.
Before too long, expect it to rank right up there with jumbo shrimp and military intelligence.
Har.
Woodyard cites the soon-to-be-introduced Lexus HS 250h hybrid luxury car as an example of a heavy user of bioplastic, noting that "about 30 percent of the car's interior and trunk will be covered in this newfangled plastic that will help make the car 85 percent recyclable."
Readers seem shocked by the news today that Achim Steiner, executive director of the U.N. Environment Programme, on Monday called on all countries to immediately take steps to ban single-use plastic bags.
His comments came with the release of a report on the growing global problem of marine litter.
"Some of the litter, like thin film single use plastic bags which choke marine life, should be banned or phased-out rapidly everywhere -- there is simply zero justification for manufacturing them anymore, anywhere," he said in a news release. "Other waste can be cut by boosting public awareness, and proposing an array of economic incentives and smart market mechanisms that tip the balance in favor of recycling, reducing or re-use rather than dumping into the sea."
The 234-page report (warning: it's a huge file) notes that plastics are the main ingredient in marine debris:
Plastic - especially plastic bags and PET bottles - is the most pervasive type of marine litter around the world, accounting for over 80 per cent of all rubbish collected in several of the regional seas assessed.
Plastic debris is accumulating in terrestrial and marine environments worldwide, slowly breaking down into tinier and tinier pieces that can be consumed by the smallest marine life at the base of the food web. Plastics collect toxic compounds that then can get into the bodies of organisms that eat the plastic. Global plastic production is now estimated at 225 million tons per year.
What does this mean? Well, it is a kick in the gut for a sector of the plastics industry that was feeling pretty good after some recent victories in efforts to stop bag bans.
Steiner's comments, and the UN report, generated a ton of headlines around the world. That's going to contribute to the public perception that plastic bags are clogging landfills and trashing the oceans.
A former bag company owner emailed some interesting these thoughts on the issue today. He notes that the global bag-ban trend is fed by plastics' negative public perception. He blames plastics industry leaders who "led the industry into the world-wide public image toilet" by failing to devote the necessary resources to education and image-building efforts.
This is an incredible situation - a "UN", fergodsake, world-wide ban on single-use plastic bags.
Regardless of one's ups and downs (assuming it hasn't yet been fatal), it's always comforting to think your professional work has made at least a few contributions to your industry and to the world, greater or lesser, in addition to building your own cash reserves. Abject "plastic product stewardship", to use their euphemism, has resulted in thousands of people being blasted as having spent their entire career - and many family fortunes - damaging the world to a greater degree. What wasted lives and assets so many of us committed to that unseen, unintended and ridiculously-accused result.
No one should foolishly find comfort in not being a "single-use bag producer" today. "Single-use plastic everything" is next.
That's a sobering thought, and it may be close to the truth. There's an anti-plastics bias that's evident -- supporters of the ban would tell you that it's warranted -- because Steiner isn't calling for a ban on all single-use bags -- just the plastic ones.
In a couple of weeks, visitors to NPE2009 will arrive in Chicago to paint the town plastic.
But right now, Chicago has a plastic-related project of its own that's pretty neat.
Columbian Model & Exhibit Works Ltd. is creating a plastic model of downtown Chicago. The Chicago Tribune has a feature story and slide show about the exhibit, which is on display at the Chicago Architecture Foundation in the Santa Fe Building, on 224 S. Michigan Ave.
Viewing of the 25- by-35-foot model is free. Each building in Chicago's downtown is represented, manufactured from acrylic using a stereolithography machine.
The exhibit runs through Sept. 20, and Cathy Tinker, owner of Columbian Model & Exhibit Works, told the newspaper "We're not aware of any city model that has a footprint of this size and scale anywhere else in this country."
Now if Chicago only had a tall building that tourists could visit where they could view the downtown area, to compare the accuracy of the model with the real thing...
Many plastics molders are geniuses at finding ways to make products using less resin, or less expensive materials. Warner Home Video got some attention for its efforts on Sunday, in a story on its lightweight DVD packaging on The New York Times' Web site.
The story, headlined "Making a Case for the Environment and the Bottom Line," notes that Warner, "by far the world's largest distributor of television and movies on DVDs, has started releasing all of its new and library titles in cases that have 20 percent less plastic, a spokeswoman said. In some instances, the cases feature a thin layer of plastic; others have cutouts in the walls."
Cutting the weight of its jewel boxes will reduce the division's carbon emissions by 31 percent, according to the story.
The D.C. Council voted to put a 5 cent tax on plastic bags yesterday. Do newspapers, like The Washington Post, have to pay the tax -- or give up plastic sleeves?
The answer is no, according to Andrew Alexander, the Post's ombudsman. He writes in his blog today that the sleeves are "safe" from the D.C. plastic tax.
This despite the fact that the Post "has written several editorials supporting the nickel tax, including one that ran several days before a hearing on the legislation in early April," he writes.
Alexander notes that some opponents of the tax felt it was hypocritical of the newspaper to support a tax, while at the same time using plastic bags to protect its morning newspapers from the weather.
Do you think?
Other bags exempt from the tax: Door-hanger bags; dry cleaning bags; packages of bags intended for use in holding garbage, pet waste, or yard waste; bags provided by pharmacists for prescription drugs; bags used by consumers inside stores to package bulk items such as fruit, vegetables, nuts, grains, candy, or small hardware items; bags to wrap frozen foods, meat or fish, flowers or potted plants, or other items where dampness may be a problem; and bags to carry unwrapped prepared foods or bakery goods.
Environmental blogs are buzzing this week with stories on a leaked email from a trade group for metal containers on efforts to block bans of bisphenol A.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, The Washington Post and Environmental Working Group obtained copies of the email, which gives an insider look at the metal can industry's strategy for dealing with BPA-related safety issues.
Attendees suggested using fear tactics (e.g. "Do you want to have
access to baby food anymore?") as well as giving control back to consumers
(e.g. you have a choice between the more expensive product that is frozen or
fresh or foods packaged in cans) as ways to dissuade people from choosing
BPA-free packaging. Attendees noted, in the past, the different associations
have had a reactive strategy with the media, with very limited proactive outreach
in reaching out to journalists. The committee agrees they need to promote new,
relevant content to get the BPA perspective into the media mix. The committee
believes industry studies are tainted from the public perspective.
The committee doubts social media outlets, such as Facebook or Twitter, will
work for positive BPA outreach. The committee wants to focus on quality instead
of quantity in disseminating messages (e.g. a young kid or pregnant mother
providing a positive quote about BPA, a testimonial from an outside expert,
providing positive video, advice from third party experts, and relevant messaging
on the GMA website). Members noted traditional media outreach has become
too expensive (they have already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars) and
the media is starting to ignore their side. The committee doubts obtaining a
scientific spokesperson is attainable. Their "holy grail" spokesperson would be a
"pregnant young mother who would be willing to speak around the country about
the benefits of BPA."
Eventually, the committee concluded before deciding on the tactics to spread
their messages, they need to develop the messages. The committees plan to
fund a joint survey and message testing--what new messages they need to
sell--before implementing a website and creating materials. Another task group will be implemented to finalize how to develop messages and aggressively use
electronic media to deliver those messages.
According to The Washington Post, the accuracy of the note was confirmed by Kathleen M. Roberts, a lobbyist for the North American Metal Packaging Alliance.
NAMPA has a statement on its Web site today attacking the Milwaukee paper's report. The trade group's site calls the memo "blatantly inaccurate and fabricated," although it goes on to defend the tactics.
"The Journal's attempt to pass off this illegitimate memo from an unidentified source as proof that industry is trying to manipulate the process is shoddy journalism at best and a breach of journalistic ethics at worst," it says. "The fact is, despite the best efforts of the Journal to portray the meeting as something sinister, it was nothing more than an effort by industry to find a way to portray correctly the science about BPA that has been repeatedly ignored by the media."
Meanwhile, the American Chemistry Council has two BPA-related statements today.
One criticizes a California Senate vote today to restrict BPA in some consumer products, saying that the legislature "bowed to pressure from vocal special interest groups. If this bill becomes law, it will do nothing to enhance product safety; it will, however, result in reduced product choice for consumers and needlessly more expensive food products."
The second welcomes a congressional request to the Food and Drug Administration to expedite its review of the scientific evidence on the safety BPA in food-contact products.
That's an eye-catching headline, isn't it? But don't worry -- Liberty Enlightening the World is still made of copper clad onto a steel structure.
The plastic is behind the scenes -- in two high density polyethylene towers used to cool the museum on Liberty Island and the interior space of the statue.
The news release came from Delta Cooling Towers Inc., which highlights the benefits of plastic towers vs. stainless steel. (Corrosion resistance, easy transportation and installation, etc.)
It's all quite promotional for the company. But I'm highlighting it in the blog today because it jumped out at me as a good example of a plastics company generating some interest in the benefits of a product that otherwise the public would never notice.
That looks to me like an effective marketing effort.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has dropped his proposal to place a 5 cent tax on plastic bags, according to severalnewsWeb sites.
Council Speaker Christine Quinn opposed the plastic bag fee, telling the mayor that the majority of council members would not support legislation that they thought would be seen as a sales tax on food.
Will that attitude carry over to other communities where local mayors and councils are considering bag taxes?
Tarheels to make throwing away plastic bottles illegal
Starting Oct. 1, it will be illegal to throw away plastic bottles in North Carolina.
According to this story in the Elizabeth City, N.C., Daily Advance, the law will prohibit disposal of rigid plastic containers. Scott Mouw, environmental supervisor for the state Department of the Environment and Natural Resources, told the newspaper that the state expects a huge environmental payoff, in addition to economic benefits. By collecting more HDPE and PET, local recyclers will benefit, as well as the state's plastics processors.
Mike Verespej, Plastics News' staff reporter who covers recycling, talked to Mouw for some stories recently, too. In our recent special report on recycling, Verespej's sources noted that the market for HDPE is "a little bleak" right now, while PET is experiencing an uptick.
I enjoyed some of the reader comments on the Daily Advance story. One reader suggests that the government pay people to go to the dumps and sort trash for recycling. Wouldn't it be easier collect them in a recycling bin, rather than digging through a landfill?
This is the first day that the city of Toronto is requiring stores to charge customers a nickel each for single-use plastic bags.
With all the debate about bag taxes in New York and various cities in California, Toronto's city council passed and implemented its bag tax pretty quickly. The original proposal was to give shoppers a 10-cent-per-bag discount to those who brought their own reusable bags.
The city wants to cut by 70 percent the 460 million plastic bags used in Toronto per year by 2012.
For those of you in Toronto who plan to avoid the 5 cent tax by using reusable bags, don't forget not to use the same bags for food that you use for diapers and gym clothes.
Where can you turn for accurate info on chemicals?
There's plenty of information available on the Web about chemicals, but many of the sites are loaded with misinformation or bias. So which sites can you trust?
STATS, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization affiliated with the George Mason University, recently polled toxicologists, and the results are pretty sobering. WebMD was the only source rated as accurate by the majority (56 percent) of toxicologists for covering the risks of chemicals. Second place went to Wikipedia (45 percent).
Only 15 percent described similar coverage in the national print media as accurate.
The survey isn't scientific, so take the results with a grain of salt, but it's interesting that toxicologists don't seem to be enamoured with the information available on the Web.
I decided to check out what WebMD has to say about bisphenol A, since that chemical has been in the news headlines. The site had a few relevant links, including one list of FAQ on BPA.
Here are a couple of the key questions and answers:
Is bisphenol A safe?
That's a controversial question.
An FDA draft report issued in August 2008 says bisphenol A is safe at typical exposure levels from food and drink. But another government report, from the National Toxicology Program, doesn't rule out safety risks and notes "some concern" about effects on the brain, prostate gland, and behavior in fetuses, infants, and children.
The NTP's report, issued in September 2008, also notes "minimal concern" about effects on the mammary gland, early female puberty, and reproductive effects in adults who work with bisphenol A, and "negligible concern" about fetal or neonatal death, birth defects, reduced birth weight or grown in babies born to women exposed to bisphenol A during pregnancy, and reproductive effects in adults who don't work with bisphenol A.
The American Chemistry Council, a trade group for the plastics industry, says bisphenol A is safe for typical consumer uses.
What does the research say about bisphenol A?
A study published in the Sept. 17, 2008 edition of The Journal of the American Medical Association shows that adults with high levels of bisphenol A in their urine samples are more than twice as likely to report a history of heart disease or diabetes, compared to adults with low urinary levels of bisphenol A.
That study was the first to show an association between higher urinary levels of BPA and health problems in human adults. But it doesn't prove that bisphenol A causes heart disease or diabetes, and the researchers caution that their findings need to be confirmed.
Much of the other bisphenol A safety research has been done on rodents, which handle bisphenol A differently from humans. In those rodent studies, the greatest risk has been seen in developing fetuses and infants.
How about environmental groups, and industry groups like the American Chemistry Council? Interestly, industry groups polled higher on the accuracy scale. Only 3 percent of the toxicologists polled consider Greenpeace to be an accurate source of information, for example, compared to 41 percent for ACC.
BASF Corp.'s Polyurethane Business Unit is offering a design seminar for thermoplastic polyurethanes at NPE2009. The event will take place on Wed., June 24, in room W476 at Chicago's McCormick Place, from 2-5 p.m.
Admission is free to the first 100 registrants. For information, check the agenda and listing of speakers and topics at elastollanevent.com or e-mail info@elastollanevent.com.
Speakers include representatives from BASF, Krauss Maffei, Glycon, the Mold Doctor, BrandImage, Mike Sepe from the Material Analyst.
Plastic straws seem like pretty simple products, right? But an inventor near Atlanta has come up with an interesting new version that prevents a common problem -- juice squirting out the end of the straw when you insert it into a juice box or pouch.
By the way, don't you hate it when that happens? Somehow the straw always seem to be aimed at my shirt.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has a story about Robert Stribling of Between, Ga., who came up with the clever straw.
The basic idea was simple enough: add a valve to the top of the straw that would permit liquid to rise only when drawn by mouth. The bottom part of the straw looks like the others, long and straight. But the top, the piece that goes into the mouth, is different.
The tricky part of Stribling's innovation -- the part that's required years of planning, engineering, manufacturing research and testing for safety and functionality -- is the material that goes into that mouthpiece. It's liquid silicon rubber, an inert, engineered resin made from sand that thus far has had mostly medical and automotive applications.
Stribling has deals to produce the material and to design and assemble the machinery to make the straws.
Stribling's company, The Last Straw LLC, hasn't made him a million bucks -- yet. According to the story, he's looking for a beverage company willing to give his straw a try.
It turns out that reusable bags can be a breeding ground for potentially scary stuff: bacteria including E. coli and Salmonella, plus mold and yeast.
The researchers noted that using reusable bags as a multi-purpose tote -- something it saw from the majority of bag owners in this study, is a big concern, "particularly if the reusable bags are used to transport gym equipment or diapers. Gym equipment may carry drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, skin infecting dermatophyte fungi and other dangerous microorganisms."
Among the conclusions: drafting of protocols on the hygienic use of reusables, including suggestions for regular replacement of reusable bags.
My first thought, before reading the entire report, was that consumers can avoid all the hazards of reusable bags (often made of nonwoven polypropylene or other polymers) by simply washing their bags regularly. But the study notes:
Reusable bags can in principle be cleaned, but drying them out thoroughly is problematical and their flimsy nature deters scrubbing that would remove organic deposits. Any imperfect cleaning would tend to add water to incompletely removed food
material and thus inadvertently boost microbial growth.
Serious consideration needs to be given to a microbiologically adequate cleaning protocol for such bags. At very least, if people do choose to wash their bags, it is critical that they not lay them flat to dry but instead turn them inside out and suspend them in order to properly air them out. This will avoid the creation of a moist habitat for bacteria, mold and yeast. Consideration should also be given to replacing the reusables regularly to avoid the whole issue of bacterial build up.
Some critics may dismiss the results of this study because it was commissioned by CPIA, which you might assume could be trying to cast doubt on the safety of reusable bags in order to slow the avalanche of taxes and bans on plastic shopping bags.
But the trade group notes that it "strongly supports reduction and reuse, and recognizes use of reusables as good environmental practice, but it does not want to see these initiatives inadvertently compromise public health and safety."
So there you have it. Go ahead and use reusable bags to tote your groceries. But don't use the same bags for food that you use to carry your gym clothes or dirty diapers.
And, for goodness sake, wash them once in a while, dry them carefully, and don't continue to use them to carry food after they get dirty and gross.
Nestle Waters North America and other bottled water companies have filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New York to stop the state from implementing a deposit law on water bottles.
Nestle Waters CEO Kim Jeffery released a statement that said in part: "We believe the best ones encourage recycling of all containers, do not hurt consumers and do not favor special interests. The New York bottle bill fails all three tests. Moreover, the new law is unconstitutional, and we need a sound foundation if we are going to build a lasting and effective recycling program."
The company also highlighted opposition to the N.Y. deposit by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who owns a small bottler called Keeper Springs.
The bottlers have a point about drinks being treated unequally under the law, since it covers water but not sports drinks. Still, their cries that they support recycling, but oppose deposits, come across as hollow.
Not anymore. Today Reuters is reporting that Kuwait oil minister Sheikh Ahmad al-Abdullah al-Sabah, in an interview at the World Economic Forum in Jordan, said the deal is not going to happen.
Asked if Kuwait might consider reviving a $17.4 billion petrochemicals deal with Dow Chemical that was scrapped last year, he said: "No no no. It is dead."
Not a big surprise at this point, but it's worth sharing with Dow watchers on the blog.
I'll be watching for a Liveris interview on CNBC to react to the news and map out the company's next step.
About a year ago, I posted an item about Coca-Cola Co.'s thoughts about bioresins. Fast forward to today, and it's apparent that Coke has made quite a bit of progress in just 11 months.
This morning, Coke introduced a new bottle made a blend of conventional and bioresin materials that it dubbed the PlantBottle.
Up to 30 percent of the resin used the in bottle is made from PET sugar cane and molasses as feedstocks.
According to Coke, bottles made from the blend "can be processed through existing manufacturing and recycling facilities without contaminating traditional PET."
"This innovation is a real win because it moves us closer to our vision of zero waste with a material that lessens our carbon footprint and is also recyclable," said Scott Vitters, director of sustainable packaging for Coke, in a news release.
Coca-Cola North America will pilot the PlantBottle with Dasani and sparkling brands in select markets later this year, and with vitaminwater in 2010.
No. 6: Given a choice between paper and plastic bags, go with paper. Fact: From a standpoint of carbon emissions, they're equally bad. Plastic is worst from a solid waste perspective. (But plastic is a littering problem in many places.) Most environmentally friendly of all, as you already know, is bringing your own resusable bags [which is, admittedly, easier if you aren't buying groceries for a family of four].
and,
No. 9: Buy milk in paper or glass cartons if you have the choice. Fact: Because half-gallon plastic milk jugs use much less material, they have lower life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions than glass or paper containers of the same size.
Judy Lowe of The Christian Science Monitor's Bright Green Blog challenged Zeke Hausfather, executive vice president of energy science at Climate Culture, to share the science behind the "myth" claims.
Here's what he had to say. Regarding paper vs. plastic bags, he said: "Paper and plastic bags both require comparable amounts of energy per bag for production, given that paper bags are considerably more massive than plastic ones, though paper bags are slightly preferred. Data on lifecycle carbon emissions for paper and plastic are taken from FRIDGE: Socio-economic impact assessment of the proposed plastic bag regulations. Other reports argue that paper bags have higher lifecycle GHG emissions, though methodologies and analysis boundaries differ across reports."
The Chicago Tribune has a feature story today on how the horticulture industry is trying to "green up" the way it uses plastic products, including trays, flats and pots.
The story notes that "Growers, big-box stores, manufacturers and garden centers are under pressure not just from more environmentally conscious consumers, but from the zooming prices of oil and natural gas -- the raw materials of plastics. Though a substantial proportion of the plastic resin that goes into the larger, sturdier pots is recycled from other sources, not much of that gets reused or recycled again. Most goes to landfills."
But talks are underway to fix the problem. This week the American Nursery & Landscape Assocation is discussing a proposal to make recycling easier by standardizing and limiting the sizes of pots and the materials used to make them.
According to the story, one of the industry's goals is to produce a biodegradable pot that could be planted directly into the soil.
That's certainly possible today -- but I doubt that consumers will be eager to pay a premium for such products.
Thanks to Pete Fehrenbach, managing editor of sister newspaper Waste & Recycling News, for alerting me to this story.
Pawlenty also signed the a piece of legislation called the Toxic Free Kids Act, which requires the state Health Department to assess chemicals used in consumer products.
The BPA ban takes effect in January 2011. Since most manufacturers of baby bottles and sippy cups are already rushing to find alternative materials to replace polycarbonate, chances already are pretty good that these products will disappear from store shelves everywhere -- not just in Minnesota -- well before the deadline.
A NASA technology that was developed for an aerospace high-speed research program is now part of an implantable device for heart failure patients.
NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., created an advanced aerospace resin, named Langley Research Center's Soluble Imide, or LaRC-SI. NASA describes the material as highly flexible, resistant to chemicals, and able to withstand extreme hot and cold temperatures.
"One of the advantages of this material is that it lends itself to a variety of diverse applications, from mechanical parts and composites to electrical insulation and adhesive bonding," said Rob Bryant, a NASA Langley senior researcher and inventor of the material, in a NASA news release.
In July 2004, NASA licensed the patented insulation technology to Medtronic Inc., which used the material in its Attain Ability left-heart lead, which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune describes the lead in this story, posted today:
Medtronic Inc., the Fridley[, Minn.]-based medical device maker, claims that its Attain Ability heart lead wire represents the first time a NASA-developed material has been used in an implantable medical device.
The company said Wednesday that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the lead, a wire that connects a cardiac resynchronization device (CRT) implanted in the chest to the left ventricle of the heart.
CRT devices emit electrical impulses to resynchronize heartbeats in patients suffering from heart failure, a chronic condition that afflicts about 5 million Americans. Historically, it has been difficult for doctors to snake the leads, or wires, to the correct spot in the heart targeted for stimulation.
The "super plastic" insulation on the lead, as well as its thin design, make this process easier, said Lonny Stormo, vice president of therapy development for Medtronic's Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management division. FDA approval was bolstered by a 190-patient clinical trial to prove the device's safety and effectiveness.
So now we can count LaRC-SI as the latest in a long line of medical applications that have benefited from NASA technology. For more on the resin, check NASA Langley's Advanced Materials Web site.
If a retailer starts charging for plastic bags, some consumers will start using reusable bags, or opt out of using bags at all. But how many will choose to pay for a bag? The answer comes from Marks & Spencer plc in the U.K.
The retailer started charging 5 pence for bags last year, and the Daily Mailreports today that the result of the "Banish the Bags" campaign was an 83 percent reduction in bag use in 12 months.
That adds up to 400 million bags "that would otherwise have ended up in landfill or blighting streets, the countryside and seas," according to the story.
By the numbers: M&S cut the number of bags it distributed from 464 million in the previous year to 77 million. The £1.2 million (US$1.8 million) that it collected -- 5 pence at a time -- went to an environmental group called Groundwork, which used it to create or improve greener living spaces.
Here's a proposed law related to plastic bags that the industry might support. Madison, Wis., Alderman Judy Compton and Mayor Dave Cieslewicz on Tuesday will propose banning the disposal of clean, recyclable plastic bags.
According to this story in the Wisconsin State Journal, soiled bags could still be thrown out. But if citizens throw away a clean bag -- instead of recycling it -- they could receive a $100 fine for a first offense, $200 for a second offense and $400 for third and later offenses in a year.
"It's a matter of putting our money where our mouth is on environmental issues," Compton told the newspaper. "It's really a simple thing."
She would prefer to ban bags -- a la San Francisco. But Compton offered this proposal instead, as a compromise, because she doesn't want to penalize residents who like using plastic bags. (Some people really do... really.)
Madison doesn't plan to create a trash cop who will inspect everyone's garbage, looking for offenders. But it will make it easier for residents to recycle bags. The plan calls for investing in new drop-off recycling sites.
This is an interesting idea. It should boost bag recycling, which is pretty pitiful in most communities. It also allows people who like reusing plastic bags to do so without being penalized (assuming they don't litter, of course). That's a plus for dog owners.
Will the plastics industry actually support this idea, with its roots in the liberal hotbed of Madison? I don't see any reason why not.
Three Bristol, Vt., high school students went to the state legislature this week proposing a tax on plastic bags. They ended up getting a lesson on politics.
The Rutland Heraldhas the report on Tuesday's testimony in Montpelier by Torin Olivetti, 18, Cooper Thompson, 17, and Alex Horn, 17, before the state House Ways and Means Committee.
According to the story, the Mount Abraham Union High School students suggested a 6 cent bag tax to encourage use more widespread use reuseable bags, and to raise new revenue for the state.
Horn explained: "We use plastic bags for everything from the grocery store to the mall. But these bags aren't great for the environment, so we started thinking of ways to discourage people from using them and encourage them to switch to reuseable bags."
Legislators had some interesting advice for the trio.
Rep. David Zuckerman, P-Burlington, suggested they change the language in the bill from a tax to a fee. I love that advice. Voters hate taxes -- but fees are hunky-dory, right?
Rep. David Sharpe, D-Bristol, suggested building a grassroots movement for their plan. Isn't that what they were trying to do? I don't think these kids are registered lobbyists.
Following Tuesday's popular Plastics Blog post on a St. Louis high school student's Earth Day newspaper column, I thought it would be interesting to note some other students' efforts in opposition to plastic bags.
Remember next time, kids -- if you want the legislators to like your idea, don't call it a tax. Call it a fee.
The American Chemistry Council's Plastics Division offered two training sessions on the sustainability of plastic packaging at Wal-Mart's Sustainable Packaging Fair, held April 14-15. The first session, entitled Plastic Packaging and Sustainability, was delivered by ACC's Keith Christman. The second, given by Jeff Wooster of Dow Chemical Co., addressed Bioplastics.
The presentations use lifecycle assessment and Wal-Mart's packaging scorecard to show how plastic packaging reduces environmental impacts compared to alternatives.
Now ACC will offer these training sessions via a free webinar on May 13. Interested? Sign up here to participate.
Forgive the headline on this post -- I'm not advocating beating up anyone. But blog reader Sam Longstreth at Brentwood Plastics Inc. in St. Louis felt a bit like he was reduced to that last week, when he wrote a letter to the editor of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch responding to an Earth Day column written by a high school student.
Liz Godar, a junior at Villa Duchesne High School and a member of the Interschool Ecological Council, wrote the April 22 column that started the debate, headlined "The plastic bag is not a harmless necessity." Here's an excerpt:
Plastic bags are more than they appear. The consequences of this oversight are severe and at this point, no longer can be ignored. Plastic bags are made largely through petroleum, increasing the United States' already overwhelming dependency on foreign oil. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the United States uses about 320 billion plastic bags and sacks each year.
Perhaps the worst effect is their catastrophic environmental consequences. Plastic bags account for 10 percent of the waste built up along the U.S. shoreline and kill thousands of birds and marine animals each year, from seals to turtles to dolphins. These bags break down into even more toxic petro-polymers that then work their way into our food system. Not only are billions of these soon-to-be-toxic waste bags floating around in our waterways and oceans, but they will take 500 years to disappear completely.
While plastic bags are recyclable, fewer than 1 percent actually are recycled. Even so, the recycling process is extremely economically insensitive. According to the San Francisco Department of the Environment, processing and recycling a ton of plastic bags costs about $4,000, and the new recycled material will then be sold in the commodities market for a pathetic sum of $32.
The column goes on to push for consumers to reject plastic bags, with praise for various communities that have passed bag taxes or bans.
That didn't sit well with Longstreth, president of Brentwood Plastics, a St. Louis-based film extruder.
Longstreth wrote this reply to the newspaper:
It is apparent that Villa Duchesne does not teach chemistry prior to the second semester of the junior year, otherwise it is probable that Miss Godar would not have regurgitated the pernicious nonsense she is being taught by the Interschool Ecological Council. Had she taken chemistry, Miss Godar would be able to figure out that high density polyethylene, the product that she finds so dangerous, is chemically inert. In other words, it does not react with other chemicals. That's why, if she had taken chemistry, she would know that the statement that polyethylene "bags break down into even more toxic petropolymers" cannot be defended.
I hate to break this to Miss Godar at the tender age of 17, but she should not believe everything the government tells her. The San Francisco Department of Environment's price of $32 per ton for post-consumer polyethylene is so far off the mark that it makes anyone who purchases polyethylene burst into laughter. I will buy every ton Miss Godar can find at $32, I'll even pay the freight.
Bans are emotionally satisfying quick answers to complex problems. But do bans work? If you ban alcohol, will people not drink? If you ban abortions, will women not get them? If you ban guns, will people not kill each other? If you ban plastic bags, will people not litter?
Longstreth is a rare breed these days. He's a plastics industry executive willing to stick his neck out and comment, with his name attached, on a news report that he felt was unfair.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently honored four Westport, Conn., residents for their part in enacting a ban on plastic bags in their town.
Jonathan Cunitz, Liz Milwe, Gene Seidman and Jeffrey Wieser were among the winners of the 2009 Environmental Award. EPA's Web site notes:
In early 2008, the four Members of District 4 of the Westport, Connecticut Representative Town Meeting (RTM) met to discuss the concern of the increasing appearance of plastic bags on the town's roads, streams, river and beaches. Jonathan Cunitz, Liz Milwe, Gene Seidman, and Jeffrey Wieser spent the next several months researching the issue of plastic bags in the environment and the available alternatives to remedy this growing problem. After many meetings with town leaders, merchants, students, residents and other members of the Westport RTM, they concluded that the appropriate response was to enact an ordinance that encouraged the use of reusable shopping bags and ban the use of plastic retail checkout bags. In the months to follow, the ordinance was discussed at various meetings and finally submitted to the proper committees for approval. It received overwhelming support, and was approved by a vote of 26 to 5. Westport has now become one of the first communities east of California to pass a ban on retail checkout bags and its ordinances is the most extensive in the country, applying to all stores and even farmers' markets and sidewalk sales.
I think it's noteworthy that EPA chose to honor a group for banning a plastic product.
How the media played ACC's bag-recycling announcement
Plastic bag makers and the American Chemistry Council made a pretty big announcement yesterday -- a pledge that they intend to use 40 percent recycled content in plastic carryout bags by 2015, including 25 percent post-consumer material.
They say the move will save enough energy to heat 200,000 homes.
Seems like a natural for news reporters looking for Earth Day stories, right? I thought I'd check into how the story is being played.
USA Today gave the industry side, along with some views of opponents:
"It's annoying. And it's transparent," says Kathleen Rogers, president of Earth Day Network. "The death knell has sounded for plastic bags. They're just trying to continue to make a bad thing."
The Natural Resources Defense Council agrees: "We don't want people to use disposable bags. We want people to use reusable bags," says Darby Hoover, a senior research specialist.
Management consultant Pam Murtaugh says the Earth Day gambit will backfire. "They're late to the party of good sense. In bragging about it now, they're only building their own glass house."
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer noted that one local environmentalist gave the plan a somewhat lukewarm endorsement:
"Forty percent as a target six years from now is a very positive step," said Heather Trim of People for Puget Sound, one of the groups pushing for the 20-cent per bag fee in Seattle. "But a turtle choking on a plastic bag doesn't notice if the bag is recycled."
Trim said people in Seattle should avoid using plastic bags altogether. "That's why we have this (proposed) green fee. The sentiment of Americans is turning away from plastics."
The comments sections of both stories, as usual, feature a pretty healthy debate on the pros and cons of plastic bags.
(And yes, I noticed that someone named "Clear Perpsective" kicked off the discussion on both sites with identical responses. Would "Clear Perspective" care to identify him/herself on the blog?)
Overall, I'm surprised that the story didn't get more attention today. Perhaps it will be wrapped into more Earth Day coverage in tomorrow's headlines.
According to the Christian Science Monitor's vote blog, Limbaugh also announced today that he will personally see to it that he destroys two acres of rain forest.
"What else am I going to do for Earth Day?" he asked. "I'm going to have every one of my cars driven as much as possible today; I've got my airplane flying to Los Angeles and back; ... all the lights are going to be on, the air conditioning down to 68 degrees in all, well, four out of the five houses -- the property manager in [the fifth house] likes the temperature down to 65 degrees."
Probably not the image the plastics industry was hoping for today. Thanks anyway, Rush.
The American Chemistry Council is taking another stab at using social media to start a dialogue on plastics issues, with its second Blog Summit. The new summit went live today, and the topic is a focused on plastics, "Too Valuable to Waste."
Participants in this go-around include Sharon Kneiss, ACC vice president of products divisions and blog moderator, plus Bill Carteaux, president and CEO of the Society of the Plastics Industry; John Frederick, executive director of the Professional Recyclers of Pennsylvania Recycles; Blaire Pollock, solid waste planner of Orange County, N.C.; Anne Johnson, director of the GreenBlue Sustainable Packaging Coalition; Billy Jones, general manager of Salvage America; John Lively of Preserve Products; Patty Moore, president of Moore Recycling; Rachelle Strauss, blog author from MyZeroWaste.com; Amanda Wills, assistant editor of Earth911.com; and Jeff Wooster, Dow Chemical Co.'s North American senior value chain manager.
Some of the initial posts include "the bright side of the recession" from Wills, "let's make it EASY for people to recycle" from Wooster, and the interestingly named "return to Gilligan's Island" from Jones.
The Toronto Star is the latest newspaper to assign a reporter to the task of trying to live a week without plastic. Once again, the reporter discovers that it's really difficult to buy food at a modern supermarket without any plastic packaging.
Once again, the reporter also fails to note that the assignment is basically pretend, because there's no real effort to live without any plastics. The focus here is pretty much on packaging. And why do food companies use plastic instead of other materials? There's no effort to find out -- just a general plastics-are-bad attitude.
Star feature writer Francine Kopun starts the story by saying that living without plastic is a fantasy of hers:
I dream of whacking every plastic toy that has been brought into our house since my son was born four years ago. My fantasy includes a brown packing box, the Goodwill and a shopping expedition to The Toy Space Inc., an eco-friendly, family-owned store that sells wooden toys.
My son will buy educational hand puppets and grow up to be an acclaimed actor. Or a best-selling author, telling Vanity Fair that he got his start making up stories for Peter and Patty puppet.
Second thoughts sour my fantasy as I mentally scan the contents of our house. The meat we buy is wrapped in plastic. So are the mushrooms, milk, cereal, bread and sparkling water. My toothbrush is plastic. I think the bumper on our Dodge Caravan is plastic.
I decide to try anyway. With everything going green these days, I should be able to make it up as I go along.
As it turns out, even organic produce is wrapped in plastic and a good, plastic-free water bottle is hard to find.
Yes, that bumper is probably plastic. Take a closer look at the car, and your house, your computer, your plumbing, your office.
You can pretend if you like, but unless you move to a log cabin without electricity (insulated cords -- remember?), you're probably going to have quite a bit of plastic in your life.
But I doubt that will stop us from seeing more newspapers and TV stations tackling this story ideaagain this year.
Great. Just what we all need -- another sin to possibly commit. This one, however, has nothing to do with your neighbor's wife. It has to do with "greenwashing," or "the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service."
TerraChoice Environmental Marketing, which published an original document listing "The Six Sins of Greenwashing" back in 2007, has just updated its research and added a seventh sin -- "the sin of worshipping of false labels." Its new report contains some startling information about the use and misuse of environmental marketing claims, including a 98 percent sinning rate. Here's a snippet from the executive summary:
In November 2008 and January 2009, TerraChoice researchers were sent into category-leading 'big box' retailers in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia with instructions to record every product making an environmental claim. For each product, the researchers recorded product details, claim(s) details, any supporting information, and any explanatory detail or offers of additional information or support. In the United States and Canada, a total of 2,219 products making 4,996 green claims were recorded.
These claims were tested against best practices, notably against guidelines provided by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Competition Bureau of Canada, Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, and the ISO 14021 standard for environmental labeling.
Of the 2,219 North American products surveyed, over 98% committed at least one of the previously identified Six Sins of Greenwashing and a new Seventh Sin emerged.
Philadelphia-based Terrachoice explained this new sin thusly: "Some marketers are exploiting consumers' demand for third-party certification by creating fake labels or false suggestions of third-party endorsement. This development is serious enough to warrant its own category -- hence the seventh Sin."
TerraChoice offers downloadable PDF versions of both the 2007 and the updated reports on its Web site. And if this topic interests you, then you also may wish to check out this video clip of TerraChoice VP Scot Case when he discussed the first six sins last November at the Sustain '08 conference in Chicago. Another Sustain speaker, C. Steven Baker, Chicago-based head of the Federal Trade Commission's Midwest Region, in his presentation added some thoughts of his own on the topic of responsible environmental marketing.
Good luck keeping your nose clean! (and thanks to Robert Grace, editor and associate publisher of Plastics News, for contributing this post).
When I think of salty snacks, I'm not thinking "sustainability." But apparently some consumers of Frito-Lay North America Inc.'s SunChips do -- because the company announced yesterday that, by 2010, it will introduce "the first fully compostable snack chip bag made from plant-based materials."
This month the company is taking the first step, using PLA in the outer layer of its 10.5-ounce SunChips snacks bags. "We know environmentally-friendly packaging is a priority for our SunChips consumer,” said Gannon Jones, vice president, marketing, said in a news release. “Today’s launch of packaging made with 1/3 renewable materials is an important first step towards having a fully compostable chip bag in market by Earth Day 2010.”
Do you remember Starlite, the supposedly nuclear-bomb-proof plastic created by Maurice Ward, who we described back in 1994 as an "eccentric inventor, horse-racing enthusiast, former plastics recycler and one-time hairdresser"?
The London Telegraph remembers, and it has an amusing feature story on Ward and Starlite on its Web site today.
Ward is still quite a character. He meets a reporter and shows off a chunk of Starlite with a small charred mark, which Ward claims is the result of a nuclear blast.
Despite a rush of publicity 15 years ago, Starlite has not been commercialized. The Telegraph story chalks that up, in part, to the failure to finalize a deal with Boeing Co.
Publicity stopped when Ward entered into talks with Boeing in the late Nineties (and, according to Ward, involved researching using Starlite to protect Air Force One from a nuclear flash). They were almost successful. Contracts were drawn up, though no figures were written down. 'They used x and y on the documents, but figures were being bandied about of between a hundred million and half a billion.' ... Negotiations collapsed, says Ward, because Boeing got into trouble (there were accusations of industrial espionage and the CEO was forced to resign). He surfaced from Boeing to find that no one was knocking on his door any more. 'Boeing asked us not to talk to anybody else. It was a huge mistake, because it stopped all the opposition coming to us, too.' He sounds resigned -- 'It's quite a tale of woe, isn't it?' -- but also somewhat a changed man.
I enjoyed the opportunity to catch up on the Starlite saga. But I wish that the Telegraph story had included more independent verification of Ward's story. When Plastics Newswrote about the material back in 1994, we found a few examples where comment from third-party sources helped to paint a clearer picture of what was going on.
National Public Radio posted a story and audio report on bisphenol A and how it fits into the debate on the precautionary principle.
The story, "Is 'Better Safe Than Sorry' Reason Enough For Law?", points out that even supporters of the concept of the precautionary principle disagree about where to draw the line.
To put it bluntly, when is there enough doubt about the safety of a product to ban it? Reasonable people can disagree.
California Sen. Dianne Feinstein used a very broad definition of the precautionary principle last month when she introduced her bill to restrict BPA. "If you do not know for certain the chemical is benign, it should not be used," Feinstein said.
"It's almost impossible to prove that something will never happen," said Schettler, an expert on the precautionary principle. (He still believes BPA should be removed from food and drink containers).
Obviously the chemical industry doesn't want Feinstein's definition to set a precedent. Still, I doubt that even she would take it that far. Many chemicals that we all depend on every day in modern society are not "benign." Should we ban them all? When can we trust regulators, rather than politicians, to make these decisions?
This is probably a case of a politician oversimplifying an issue for the benefit of creating a good sound bite.
Meanwhile, BPA bans continue to gain traction, not only in Congress but in statehouses, too. In New Britain, Conn., The Herald newspaper has this report on a rally in Hartford that attracted about 50 people yesterday aimed at banning BPA. The event was sponsored by the Coalition for a Safe & Healthy Connecticut, and it was attended by state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and state Sen. Ed Meyer, co-chairman of the Environmental Committee.
According to The Herald, Blumenthal had this to say about BPA:
"This chemical kills and cripples," Blumenthal said, adding that everyone needs to demand that all manufacturers be more responsible.
Perhaps Blumenthal and Feinstein need some remedial training in writing those sound bites.
Nancy Eve Cohen reports for NPR's Morning Edition that "after years of double-digit increases, bottled water sales have stopped rising. Industry analysts say the economy is driving the change, but they also say environmentalists may be having an effect."
Except maybe not. The report notes that Americans spent more than $11 billion on bottled water last year, and it quotes Kim Jeffrey of Nestle Waters North America saying that environmental concerns are not having much of an impact on sales.
"The problems we're seeing right now are very much attributable to the economic downturn, not to the fact that people are leaving bottled water in droves -- because it's just not happening," Jeffery said.
Likewise, the Canwest report reminds us that although Canadian bottled water sales topped $730 million in 2007, "yet, suddenly a bottle of water is about as au courant as Michael Jackson's Thriller -- still the world's best-selling album, but you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who will admit to ever owning it."
Reminds me of the Yogi Berra quote: "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." As soon as they started selling bottled water by the case at Wal-Mart, no one wants to admit drinking it.
I've never been a bottled water fan -- I'm too cheap. Does that mean that now I'm cool? Somehow, I doubt it.
San Jose, Calif., is the new ground zero for the battle over plastic bags, thanks to a big push by the group Save the Bay called ""The Bay vs. the Bag.
Lewis went straight for the jugular in the blog post, comparing the American Chemistry Council's efforts on behalf of plastic bags to the tobacco industry's support for cigarette smoking.
When the tobacco industry tried suing cities to stop restaurant smoking bans, it fueled public anger and resolve, not a resurgence of puffing. So it is striking to see the American Chemistry Council (ACC) using the same heavy handed tactics against cities trying to reduce or eliminate plastic bags, a dominant feature of urban trash and ocean pollution.
From Phoenix to Philadelphia, and Seattle to Washington, D.C., the ACC has unleashed lawyers, lobbyists and PR flacks against local efforts to kick the plastic bag habit. But this attempt to protect industry profits could backfire, because it's based on myths that are flimsier than the bags themselves.
Likewise, the Mercury News frames the battle as a David vs. Goliath battle:
Fearing they are losing ground in the battle to eliminate litter-producing plastic bags, members of a leading Bay Area environmental group launched a counterattack Tuesday against a chief foe: the multibillion-dollar chemical industry.
If you had any doubt which side is wearing white hats, the story concludes with this quote from Save the Bay's Lewis: "There's a battle on -- it's the bay versus the bag. And we want to make sure the bay wins."
Lewis certainly won the PR war on Tuesday. I'm sure ACC will battle back with a timely letter to the editor. Will that be enough?
The group's target: deca-bromine fire retardants in plastic pallets.
"As a result of the grave concerns surrounding deca-bromine by researchers, environmental groups and fire fighters (who come into contact with the chemical in its gaseous form), lawmakers are beginning to ban the use of deca-bromine" the release says. "The states of Maine and Washington have already passed legislation and 10 other states have introduced bills that would ban the dangerous chemical. Various countries around the world have also banned deca-bromine in the electronic, furniture, toy and clothing industries. Officials may be unaware that deca-bromine is being used in these quantities in plastic pallets."
The release touts wood pallets as "the benchmark for fire safety," and it quotes Bruce Scholnick, president and CEO of NWPCA, saying: "We recognize that alternative materials each have their place, and competition breeds innovation and quality improvements. But if new technologies prove to be harmful or risky, it needs to be excluded from use. There are alternative fire retardants. Let's face it, they may be more expensive, but what price does one put on human health and our environment?"
DuPont Co. is the latest company to give workers unpaid furloughs in an effort to save money, according to this story on delawareonline.com from Wilmington, Del.'s, The News Journal.
There are a couple of differences in DuPont's plan -- one, they don't call it a furlough, and two, it is voluntary.
According to the story, 75 senior executives have agreed to take three weeks off without pay, and thousands of others in the company are being asked to take the equivalent of two weeks.
"It's something to be said about DuPont employees that when there are challenging times, our people rally around and step up to the challenges. We have every reason to believe we'll continue that tradition in 2009," spokesman Anthony Farina told the newspaper.
DuPont has already cut 2,500 full-time jobs and eliminated 4,000 contract workers.
If your employer asked you to voluntarily take two weeks off without pay, would you do it? How many of your co-workers would take it? That would be a tough decision.
Remember back in January, when BusinessWeektouted DuPont for its decisive response to the economic downturn?
Dart Container Corp. is enlisting its workers in Lancaster, Pa., to help fight a proposed polystyrene foodservice packaging ban 70 miles away in Philadelpia.
Dart is taking the threat seriously, according to the story:
If the "Food Service Waste Reduction" ordinance passes, creating the first such ban in Pennsylvania, the company estimates it could lose 15 percent of its sales, leading to layoffs.
Worse, with Philadelphia setting a precedent, other municipalities across the state might follow suit, intensifying the damage at Dart, company officials said.
"Everybody is scared to death," said [Susan] Leftwich, of Lancaster, a quality control inspector and 13-year employee.
She called the proposal "the No. 1 topic" of conversation among the company's 1,700 workers here [in Lancaster].
Supporters of the PS tax also plan to attend the hearing. They're asking for people to bring "piles of plastic bag litter, signs, and most importantly, other supporters."
It will be interesting to see which side brings a bigger crowd, and whether the crowd will have an impact on the committee's decision.
Congratulations to the University of Akron, which this year is celebrating 100 years of polymer education.
Back in 1909, Charles M. Knight, a professor at Buchtel College, realized that young Akron rubber companies like BFGoodrich Co. would need well trained workers to keep growing. So he set up a rubber chemistry laboratory and began teaching a related course -- the Chemistry of India Rubber -- the next year.
To celebrate, the university and the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society will sponsor a black-tie optional dinner on May 4 at the John S. Knight Center in Akron. The keynote speaker will be John D. Ong, former chairman of BFGoodrich.
The plastic bag beat continues to be one of the hottest in environmental journalism. Here's a sampling of bag-related headlines today:
The California Film Extruders and Converters Association and the American Chemistry Council are each backing producer-responsibility legislation in Sacramento. If one of these bills passes, it would shift the bag debate in California -- and the trend would likely spread elsewhere. Check out staff reporter Mike Verespej's coverage of the issue, posted on our Web site today.
Whole Foods Market estimates that it has kept 150 million plastic bags from going to landfillls in the past year, since it stopped giving them out at cash registers a year ago. “At first we wondered if shoppers would just switch to paper but to our great surprise, people have been truly excited about using reusable bags,” co-President and Chief Operating Officer A.C. Gallo said in a news release.
The city of Edmonds, Wash., may beat Seattle and become the first city in Washington state to ban plastic bags. The effort is being led by Councilman Strom Peterson, according to this report on The Daily Herald's Web site.
With communities facing tight budgets and politicians reluctant to raise property or income taxes, watch for more bag tax proposals to pop up around the country in the next few months.
Crime scene investigators are changing their procedures for getting fingerprints, which they say is the result of more widespread use of recycled plastics.
According to this story from NewScientist magazine's Web site, fingerprint experts at the United Kingdom's Office Scientific Development Branch are working on a new manual for lifting prints from plastic surfaces.
"We noticed there were changes in the plastic products on the market around two to three years ago," Vaughn Sears, a project manager in the branch's Fingerprint and Footwear program, told the magazine. He said products made with recycled content may look the same, but CSI officers have to learn to adapt to the different physical and chemical properties of the materials in order to get good fingerprints.
"These new products are made from an unspecified mix of polymers, which makes them much more difficult to work with," Sears said.
I wonder if the problem is really recycled plastic, or if it could be some changes in the additive formulations. Maybe "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" will have to bring Gil Grissom and Sara Sidle out of retirement to solve this mystery.
As expected, the Seattle City Council agreed to let voters decide on the fate of a proposed plastic bag tax. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer notes, in a story that's drawing a lot of comments, that the issue could turn into quite a battle.
Reporter Chris Grygiel sets up the conflict as a war between the greens -- environmentalists -- and some opponents with "serious green" -- the plastics industry.
Those supporting the bag fee are counting on Seattle's green-friendly electorate. If recent history is any guide, opponents will be counting on vastly superior monetary resources.
The Coalition to Stop The Seattle Bag Tax -- a group funded largely by the American Chemistry Council -- had raised nearly $250,000 by the end of February, according to Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission.
Most of that money -- $239,000 -- had already been spent. The group paid to gather signatures to put the bag fee question before voters.
The anti-bag-tax group has $8,720 left in the bank, but could presumably raise a lot more.
Overall, this is a pretty fair story. It allows leaders on both sides of the debate to make their case. Keith Christman, of the American Chemistry Council, notes that despite environmentalist claims that they speak for the majority, the city's own polling shows that three out of five Seattle residents are against a fee on disposable bags.
"We think Seattle residents will look at this and say we don't need a punitive tax to do the right thing for the environment," Christman told the P-I.
It's interesting to see how the media describes the plastics industry. Keep this in mind: despite how it is often portrayed, D.C. insiders don't really consider the plastics industry a major player in political lobbying.
The plastic bag tax/ban debate has reached Washington, D.C., and it looks like it might get nasty. Marc Fisher of The Washington Postdevotes his entire Potomac Confidential column to the subject today, and the plastics industry doesn't come across very well.
The headline is "You Can Wrap That Red Herring in a Plastic (or Paper) Bag," and he starts by comparing the American Chemistry Council's current effort to stop a proposed bag tax in D.C. to a 1987 effort that turned back a deposit on soft drink containers, which elicited help from the NAACP and Operation Push.
A group called the Progressive Bag Affiliates, funded by the American Chemistry Council and leading bag makers, has hired Darrell Carrington, a lobbyist from Annapolis who is African American. Carrington tells me that he's making the rounds of council members' offices, arguing that any fee on bags "is going to disproportionately hit low-income people, who are predominantly minorities. That's what it is. Truth is truth."
Council member Yvette Alexander (D-Ward 7) has heard from more than 100 constituents who expressed their opposition, as the automated calls urged. "I'm really angry that people are portraying this as something that hurts poor people when what they're really doing is defending their own industry," she says. "It bothers me that they're making this an economic issue when the real issue is the pollution in the Anacostia River."
Retorts Carrington: "That's so dismissive and disrespectful of the poor. It's easy to sit in an ivory tower and say that."
When I seek a comment from Progressive Bag Affiliates, Shari Jackson, a leader of its campaign, says she'd be happy to talk. But the next thing I know, I get a call from their media wrangler, Jennifer Killinger, who says, "Unfortunately, we won't be able to participate in an interview."
But I get to Mark Daniels, vice president of Hilex-Poly, the nation's largest plastic bag maker, who says the appeal to minorities "is an effective argument for us because these 'taxes' really affect the minority individuals who are walking to the store."
Daniels says the industry knows there is a pollution problem. "Believe me, I'm not comfortable when I see a plastic bag in a tree, but how did it get there? When was the last time your city council went after people for littering?" He says the answer lies in more recycling, not fees or bans.
Fisher will be taking part in a live Web chat today (April 2). Check out the Post's site to participate -- it's likely that he'll be getting questions on the bag tax column.
Mohamed Al-Mady, CEO of Saudi Basic Industries Corp. of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the world's largest chemical company, gave a live interview to CNBC's Erin Burnett yesterday. The interview covers Al-Mady's thoughts on the global recession, plus a few comments about the plastics sector.
Asked whether there's any hope for a recovery soon, Al-Mady says: "We are beginning to see some glimpse of hope. I think the light at the end of the tunnel is visible right now because of depleted inventory and because of the things we have done in our industry ... reducing capacity worldwide."
He adds that Sabic has seen good signs of recovery in China and the United States, although he couches that a bit, noting that "everything is relative."
Sabic has seen some improvement in prices, but he adds that it remains to be seen whether increases will stick, he said.
Although Al-Mady was recently quoted elsewhere saying Sabic had badly timed its purchase of GE Plastics (paying $11.6 billion in 2007), he continues to emphasize that the company is taking a positive long-term view of the business.
"We are bullish on plastic for the future. Plastic will always be with us," Al-Mady said.
Greenpeace updated its Guide to Greener Electronics rankings today, and the environmental group singled out three companies for "backtracking on their commitment to eliminate vinyl plastic and brominated flame retardants from their products by the end of 2009."
Hewlett-Packard Co., Lenovo Group Ltd. and Dell Inc. were called on the carpet, while Apple Inc. and Acer were praised for "sticking to commitments to phase out these toxic substances."
"With the exception of one technical hurdle -- achieving certified PVC-free power cords -- Apple has already met its commitment to have all of its products free of PVC and BFRs by the end of 2008," Greenpeace said in a news release. "If Apple can find the solutions, there should be no reason why the other leading PC companies can't," said Iza Kruszewska, Greenpeace International toxics campaigner.
Here's a reminder from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer's Web site: Today the Seattle City Council may decide whether to let voters consider a 20 cent-per-bag tax on plastic and paper grocery bags.
Seattle had passed a bag fee last year, but a petition kept the ordinance from taking effect. Now the City Council will decide whether to let a public referendum decide the issue once and for all.
For amusement, check the comments on the PI's Strange Bedfellow blog about the issue. But be prepared for lots of name calling -- apparently Seattle is riddled with "eco-zealots" "cakesniffing ecoyuppies" and "Marxists," if you believe the commenters...
Carl Bialik, The Wall Street Journal's "Numbers Guy," today looks at a question that we've kicked around on the Plastics Blog before -- exactly how big is the Pacific Garbage Patch?
Just how big is this oceanic zone? Some say it is about the size of Quebec, or 600,000 square miles -- also described as twice the size of Texas. Others say this expanse of junk swept together by currents is the size of the U.S. -- 3.8 million square miles. Or, it could be twice that size.
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch, as it has been called, has become a symbol of what some say is a looming crisis over trash. But this floating mass of plastic in the Pacific Ocean is hard to measure, and few agree on how big it is or how much plastic it holds. That makes it difficult to determine what to do about it.
That hasn't stopped activists and the media from using only the biggest estimates of the patch's size to warn of an environmental catastrophe.
Bailik notes that some newspaper articles have exaggerated the size and density of the patch. Some stories have described it as an island, for example, which implies it is something you could walk on.
It's actually more like a soup with floating bits of plastic.
The story also notes that data comparing the volume of plastic to plankton has been misused and misquoted.
Bialik has a blog post on the topic, seeking feedback from readers.
He raises some interesting points in the story. Certainly many print and broadcast news stories do a good job reporting environmental issues related to plastic. There are lots of good environmental beat reporters out there who make sure to include all the proper context, quote experts, and thoroughly cover all the bases.
But many stories are condensed and simplified to the point that they use exaggeration and partial facts in a way that can mislead readers.
I've talked to people who really do think the Garbage Patch is a floating island that could somehow be towed to shore and recycled, landfilled or incinerated. The truth is more complex.
Still, the marine debris issue is serious, and public pressure -- even when it is informed by less than accurate news reports -- is continuing to drive debates in many communities on plastic bag taxes and polystyrene food service bans.
Tennessee is a frequent battleground in the debate over bottle deposits. Stop me if you've heard this before, but this could be the year the state finally passes a deposit law.
That's the opinion of Marge Davis, vice president of Scenic Tennessee, who wrote this opinion piece on the topic posted on the chattanoogan.com Web site.
Scenic Tennessee is a partner in a project called Pride of Place, which supports adoption of a deposit program. Davis notes that some business groups that had opposed deposit laws in the past are more open to the concept these days.
Mike Verespej, Plastics News' Washington-based staff reporter who covers recycling, notes that there are nine active bottle bills this year, not counting the one in Connecticut that already passed.
Remember the marine researcher who said the threat that plastics posed to sea life was being exaggerated? Today comes word from another researcher who disagrees.
“We wanted to see if plastics ingestion in leatherbacks was hype or reality,” James told Science Daily. “It was a monumental effort that looked back at necropsies over the last century from all over the world. ... After reviewing the results of 371 necropsies since 1968, we discovered over one third of the turtles had ingested plastic.”
The story explains that once leatherbacks ingest plastic -- which they apparently mistake for jellyfish -- "thousands of spines lining the throat and esophagus make it nearly impossible to regurgitate. The plastic can lead to partial or even complete obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in decreased digestive efficiency, energetic and reproductive costs and, for some, starvation."
“Plastics ingestion doesn’t always cause death, but there are clearly health risks to the turtles,” James said.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel won the Edward J. Meeman award for environmental reporting from the Scripps Howard Foundation for its "Chemical Fallout” series, which concentrated on bisphenol A safety and related regulatory issues.
One of the Scripps judges, Beth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, lauded the team and the newspaper for doing the work "that took the place of government agencies and public health officials."
"Here is a news organization doing the job to look out for the public's health and safety," she said.
I think it's worth keeping track of which plastics-related stories are winning big journalism awards. Remember that in 2007 the Los Angeles Times won a Pulitzer Prize for explanatory reporting for "Altered Oceans," its series that on marine debris. That coverage helped focus a lot of attention on the issue, and the plastics industry is still dealing with it today.
The Journal Sentinel's work on BPA is already generating a similar reaction -- and I think it's just beginning.
When the Milwaukee paper first started researching chemical safety, one of their reporters called me for background. I clearly remember telling him that BPA was a back-burner issue for the plastics industry. Marine debris, plastic bag recycling, Chinese product safety and PET water bottle waste were getting a lot more attention.
Things certainly can change quickly when the mainstream media focuses attention on an issue.
Various news sites, including this story from the MilwaukeeJournal Sentinel, are reporting that Sunoco Chemicals has begun requiring customers to guarantee that its bisphenol A will not be used in food and water containers for children under 3.
"We will no longer sell BPA to customers who cannot make this promise," Thomas Golembeski, head of public relations, wrote in a letter to two investors. The company policy took effect in November, according to the stories, but was just revealed in the letter this week.
Sunoco is a fairly small player in the BPA market.
DSM Thermoplastic Elastomers Inc. deserves some attention for an off-beat approach to Web marketing for its Sarlink thermoplastic vulcanizates.
The company has set up a pseudo-blog authored by would-be scientific genius Phil Gains, who posts faux-home videos about Sarlink, sprinkled with humor about his garage lab and living with his mom.
One video shows him testing the elasticity of the TPV, with results that are both amazing and amusing. (His test strip springs back to the original shape, but his dad's car does not...)
Here's a taste of the humor, from the site's "About me" page:
As I said, I’ve always been fascinated by science. I’m sure some day one of my inventions will be called pioneering research and then I can get any job and house I want (and mom will be happy after all). And maybe the lady next door will come over some time. I don’t mean (although she’s welcome as well) the kind 84-year old lady, Diane, who gives me soda whenever I pass her house during my route, but the one who’s around my age and just got divorced. Maybe I’ll show her some of my inventions, or the footage at least. I’m positive she’ll enjoy it! Last week she asked me what I was working on in the garage. I told her exactly what I was up to. ‘Interesting’, she said and smiled at me and turned around. I stepped back on my bike to finish my route.
It is nice to see a company trying something new in marketing on the Web -- not just trying to recreate electronic versions of the data sheets that it has been publishing for decades. Take a look and let me know if you agree.
You'll recall that Georgia Gulf made a big bet on the plastics construction market back in 2006 when it bought Royal Group Technologies Ltd. -- an investment that hasn't gone all that well.
But, then again, not much in the construction market has gone well lately.
According to this story in the The Janesville Gazette, Georgia Gulf wants Freedom's plant in Janesville, Wis., and Silver-Line wants the company's plant in Fort Pierce, Fla. These companies were the high bidders in an auction for the assets last week, but the court decided to hold another auction next week.
"Had we won yesterday, we would have been there today engaging the employees," Ashley Mendoza of Georgia Gulf told the newspaper. "That was our plan."
Court-appointed receiver Michael Polsky told the newspaper that Bank of America, Freedom's primary secured creditor, would not agree to the bids from Silver-Line Plastics and Georgia Gulf. The bids were for "substantially less" than the $20 million Freedom owes the bank.
Marc Skapof, a lawyer representing Silver-Line and Georgia Gulf, told the newspaper that his clients object to the new auction. So the next step, and the future of Freedom Plastics, is unclear. Polsky told the newspaper that a company consultant is preparing an operating budget for the next couple of weeks, and the bank will decide whether the company keeps running or shuts down. Stay tuned!
Thailand's Indorama Polymers plc expects a 15 percent jump in sales this year thanks to its new PET plant, which is scheduled to start running in the second quarter.
According to this story in the Bangkok Post, chief executive Dilip Kumar Agarwal said the AlphaPet Inc. plant in Alabama will benefit from growing demand for PET resin. The company expects its profit margin to improve this year, thanks to lower oil, utilities and logistics costs.
"The downside risks are very limited and we don't foresee any big issue coming up," Agarwal said.
Dow Chemical Co. and Rohm and Haas Co. issued a statement today announcing "that they are in discussions relating to the merger of their companies and the pending litigation. At this time, the companies cannot predict the outcome of these discussions. The companies will not comment further on these discussions at this time."
Reuters news service noted that the news caused shares in both companies to surge. Dow was up $1, or 15.5 percent, at $7.47, and Rohm rose $8.49, or 15.7 percent, to $62.50 on the New York Stock Exchange.
Rohm and Haas sued Dow in January to try to force the company to complete its purchase. The trial is scheduled to start on Monday.
I don't think either company's CEO wants to sit in the witness box and be grilled by the other firm's lawyers. Smart money says they settle.
Six major manufacturers of baby bottles in the United States say they will stop selling bottles made with bisphenol A -- in other words, they're dropping polycarbonate.
The companies announced the news in a letter to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who, along with the attorney general of New Jersey, had asked the companies to voluntarily stop using the material.
The request probably didn't really play any role in making the switch. Retailers have already urged bottle makers to find an alternative, and growing public awareness of the BPA safety issue made this inevitable.
"We made a business decision to move out of BPA," said Shannon Jenest of Philips Avent, which is number one in U.S. dollar sales of baby bottles.
Philips Avent stopped selling baby products with BPA on Dec. 31 in North America but continues to market them overseas, she said. "We felt like we had hit a tipping point with our consumers and with our retailers," Jenest said. "Babies R Us was banning it, Target was going to, CVS was going to, and so the distribution channels were lessening and lessening."
I'm surprised that Philips Avent is continuing to sell the bottles overseas. Could that be the difference in the legal systems?
I'm at the Plastics News Executive Forum in Las Vegas, swapping news and information with a great group of speakers and attendees. Some of my personal favorites from the first two days:
Jeff Mengel from Plante & Moran PLLC predicted that 300,000 tools will be moving around in the next few months, as struggling custom injection molders are liquidated and other work is transferred. Times are tough -- that's clear. But that sounds like an opportunity for the companies that are healthy enough to survive.
Hoop Roche, formerly of Erie Plastics Corp., gave a detailed story-behind-the-story account of how the Corry, Pa., molder went out of business last year. He had lots of good advice for companies that want to avoid the same fate.
Brian Jones, a consultant and advisor and former CEO of Nypro Inc., told the story about how the company successfully entered the packaging market in the 1990s -- despite tough competition and opposition from within the company -- and how that helped the company to make its U.S. operations profitable.
That's just a small sample. Watch our pages and our Web site for stories and videos on M&A trends, resin prices, marketing, the economy, key end-markets and more.
A tax on plastic might seem onerous if the alternatives weren't so readily available. Paper is an easy option. But clearly, the best choice is BYOB (bring your own bag).
Prius drivers determined to save the planet no longer have the market cornered on reusable bags. Biodegradable and reusable are all the rage. Even newspapers, including this one, are making the shift to biodegradable bags.
Sure, Texans could do this on their own, and many already have. But Anchía's bill would speed the transition, quickly raising consciousness about this plastic poison – the bags that will outlive us all.
Perhaps paying 7 cents will compel consumers to use common sense at the check-out by taking a pass on the plastic.
Any readers in Texas -- are grocery stores there collecting plastic bags for recycling? And are you surprised that the legislature is considering a tax on plastic bags -- and that the Dallas paper supports the idea?
Bag taxes frequently proposed, but few actually adopted
Plastic bag taxes and bans continue to pop up just about everywhere in America these days. Some seem driven by groups like the Surfriders Foundation and others concerned about marine debris. Others have an element of "here's something that the public hates that we can tax" from cash-strapped cities like New York.
But most of the proposed taxes and bans have not been successful. (Colorado shot one down today, for example). The New York Timeshas a feature story on the topic today, noting that "momentum for imposing fees or bans has expanded from a few, often affluent, liberal cities on the West Coast ... tto dozens of legislative proposals in states like Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Texas and Virginia.
"Yet as support increased in places, the national economy began to decline. No state has imposed a fee or a ban."
Why have bag taxes and bans failed? The story credits bag makers, who have stepped up marketing efforts and brought lawsuits against cities that have tried to impose bans and fees. (Check out the photo on the coalition's Web site -- it makes President Obama look like he's a plastic bag supporter!)
The story also notes that, "Despite its popular appeal, the issue has not been a priority for national environmental groups. They are more likely to focus on broad federal issues like carbon emissions, renewable energy and use of public lands."
Many artists use plastics to create interesting and beautiful pieces. In the course of my regular work, see stories about plastics in art pretty frequently. Two recent stories are worth sharing with blog readers.
First, check out this story, and the brilliant, colorful photos, from the Columbus Dispatch. The story is a Q&A interview with Bruce Siple, a Clintonville, Ohio, folk artist whose home features elaborate displays comprised of tens of thousands of pieces of plastic, arranged in symmetrical, multilevel formations.
Before Siple was married, he lived in an apartment that his friends called "the Plastic Palace." Here's a snippet from the story:
Q: Why plastic? Is this some kind of tribute to the famous line in The Graduate?
A: No, I was really attracted to plastic because it was a fascinating subject -- so accessible, so cheap. It passes through our lives like a river, and people don't pay any attention to it.
Even when it's used in packaging, there's a lot of really articulated plastic, stuff that's highly conceived and executed and does a very specific job. Maybe it's a cap on a milk carton, and we tend to just throw it in the trash without even thinking about it.
But once it gets a stage, it becomes something completely different, especially when it's put together and put in a different context.
As I've gone through life, I've sort of amplified on that. I just began to see the beauty in it. The more I got, the better it looked to me. And here I am, with tens of thousands of pieces. I can't give you a motivation beyond that.
The other story worth reading -- again, with some interesting photos -- is about an exhibit featuring the work of four Los Angeles artists who created fashionable outfits made from recycled plastic shopping bags.
"We chose to focus on the crinkly plastic shopping bag that you get at Home Depot and grocery stores. It is such a great medium to work with, very versatile, great texture," said Eveline Morel, owner of EM & Co., the boutique that featured the exhibit, in a news release. "The dresses are very wearable, they're layered onto a silk slip, have lots of holes, keep you from overheating... to clean them, you can just hose them down, no ironing required."
I definitely wouldn't iron those dresses. But from the photo, I can't really tell that they're made of plastic bags.
I've seen plastic bags used to make hula skirts, but nothing this nice. Check it out.
Are you interested in more information about bioplastics? The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s new Bioplastics Council today announced its key initiatives for 2009. They include:
Publication of the first-ever Bioplastics Industry Overview Report, including companies, products made, production numbers, applications, market growth and more.
Publication of a terminology guide to help clear up confusion over terms such as biobased and biodegradable.
Spring meetings with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Trade Commission to discuss issues impacting the bioplastics industry.
Organizing, sponsoring and leading a "Business of Bioplastics" educational program on June 23 at NPE2009.
Participation in the Emerging Technologies Pavilion at NPE2009.
"The Bioplastics Council's work for 2009 will center on our mission to educate the industry and government agencies about bioplastics, and promote the industry's growth," said Chairman Bob Findlen, vice president of sales and marketing at Telles, in a news release. "The bioplastics industry is still in its infancy but growing fast, so now is the time for this group to help lay a foundation by providing
guidance concerning bioplastics terminology and the harmonization of policies and practices."
The six founding members of the group are Arkema, BASF Corp., Cereplast Inc., DuPont Co., NatureWorks LLC and Telles.
Yesterday was the 200th anniversary of President Abraham Lincoln's birth. Did you know that a plastics fabricating company based in the heart of Dixie played a pretty cool part in the celebration?
Foam Depot in Alpharetta, Ga., made a giant foam bust of Lincoln for the David Wills House in Gettysburg, Pa. Company founder Bruce Trott and his artist partner spent 80 hours on the project, according to this story from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The bust is 7 feet, 6 inches tall and 10 feet wide, and cost $6,000.
"I’m tickled. I think it’s great,” Trott told the newspaper. “If you looked at it, you’d think it was something more dense, but if you touch it, it’s obvious it’s much softer.”
Foam Depot has a great photo spread on the project on its Web site, showing the photos and sketches that the company worked with, and various shots of the foam blocks as the were transformed into the sculpture.
The David Wills House is a museum dedicated to the Battle of Gettysburg and Lincoln, and is home to the Lincoln Leadership Institute.
With Valentine's Day coming soon, Scientific Americanhas a timely feature on greenhouses -- you know, those places that grow the roses you're supposed to buy on Saturday?
Scientific American's angle? Dutch researchers are working on ways to make greenhouses more energy-efficient. Plastics, of course, play an important role.
Until recently, most efforts to improve them involved installing thicker insulation or blocking sunlight during summer months. But Piet Sonneveld, an agricultural engineer at Wageningen University in the Netherlands, and his colleagues designed a prototype greenhouse that creates an indoor environment ideal for the Netherlands's crops and saves energy in the process.
He designed a special removable film that blocks near-infrared radiation -- a wavelength of sunlight that, unless filtered out, can overheat and damage plants during the summer. The film is just 80 microns thick (one micron equals about four one hundred-thousandths of an inch) but contains hundreds of layers of plastic polymers that filter out infrared light while allowing plant-nourishing visible light to pass through. In the wintertime, when heating is necessary, the film is removed.
Sonneveld's greenhouse also features a curved roof that focuses light on clusters of photovoltaic cells to that generate electricity for the building. Pretty cool!
The Sao Paulo, Brazil, Valor Economico newspaper is reporting that Dow Chemical Co. and Santelisa Vale SA have suspended their $1 billion project to make polyethylene resin from sugar cane. The venture had planned to start production by 2011.
For those of us who are not fluent in Portuguese, here's Bloomberg's version of the story, attributed to the the original report. It notes that the Brazilian story cites "an unnamed person familiar with the plan."
Plastics News has published a few stories (including this one) that have noted that sustainability is not a fad -- it will persist even with times are tough. So perhaps we'll see this project resurface later, once Dow can sort through its other problems.
The Society of Plastics Engineers has named the finalists for the Clean Technology Business Forum competition, which will be named at the Global Plastics Environmental Conference later this month in Orlando, Fla.
The companies will make presentations on their technologies on Feb. 26.
"This diverse group of enterprising companies will disclose innovative technologies ranging from alternative energy sources to bioplastics to new approaches in the fields of photodegradable plastics and solid waste recycling," said Eric Koester, the Clean Technology Business Forum Coordinator, in a news release. "SPE's forum will provide a unique opportunity for the industry to discover cutting-edge clean and green technologies while still in their formative phases. The finalist companies will offer an exciting look at the future of the plastics."
The finalists are:
Cool Energy Inc., a solar energy equipment company located in Boulder, CO, is focused on the development and implementation of systems that can cost-effectively harness the sun's energy to provide heat and electricity for homes and business.
Exotech Bio Solutions Ltd. manufactures biocompatible and biodegradable superabsorbent polymers (SAP) for use in the personal hygiene, pharmaceutical, food, environmental and agricultural markets. ExoSAP is biodegradable and less expensive to produce than competing materials.
FRX Polymers Inc. is a pilot-stage specialty polymer company that is developing a patent-protected family of environmentally friendly, inherently flame retardant, transparent, high-flow engineering thermoplastics.
Polyflow LLC, is commercializing patent-pending alternative energy technology that makes it possible to convert mixed-waste polymers into monomers, the feedstock used by petrochemical companies to make polymers. The major product of the Polyflow process is styrene, a feedstock for polystyrene and other polymers. The process is a low-cost alternative to existing methods for producing styrene.
PolyNew Inc. blends PLA with other plastics for use in solid and foamed tray prototypes for microwaveable food and other packaging applications.
SunBrite Packaging Co. Inc, has developed packaging that has the same appearance and applications as polystyrene foam for food and beverage packaging and is engineered to photodegrade in the environment, both on land and in water. After use, the power of light is harnessed to degrade this packaging material in a matter of weeks to months, depending on the photoaccelerant concentration present.
According to TheHill.com, resin suppliers are lining up for government help -- they're trying to get "billions of dollars in energy efficiency funding" to the Senate version of the economic stimulus bill.
Jim Snyder reports that Cal Dooley, president and CEO of the American Chemistry Council, is asking for more funds for make buildings more energy-efficient, and also to support coal gasification technologies.
Companies like DuPont, Dow Chemical and Owens Corning that have shed thousands of jobs in recent years could be big winners if more money is added to these accounts. They make the vinyl windows, thermal roof coatings and insulation that seal buildings and homes so that they leak less energy, which not only cuts heating and cooling costs but carbon emissions as well. ACC estimates there is about $17,000 worth of chemical products in a new home.
"The [Senate Appropriations Committee's] $50 plus billion of clean energy investments is a good start, but we urge you to put even more money into building tomorrow's lower carbon energy economy," ACC said in a letter sent last week. It noted an estimate by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank with ties to the Obama administration, that as much as $120 billion could be spent on clean-energy programs.
What a difference a year makes. At this time last year, North American resin companies were raising prices as fast as they could, spurred by skyrocketing feedstock prices and strong demand (at least from export markets).
Now many these same suppliers are suffering, as demand has collapsed and feedstock prices have fallen through the floor. Will Congress -- and the Obama administration -- see fit to include their requests in the big stimulus bill?
Out-of-work folks line up for shrink-wrap franchises
Here's an interesting idea for a plastics-related small business. A Reno, Nev., company is offering franchises for investors who want to go into business as freelance shrink-wrappers.
That's right -- shrink wrappers. It's not just for packaging anymore. A lot of folks use shrink wrap to store boats over the winter, and the company, Fast Wrap USA, notes that uses for the protective film are "growing beyond marinas to disaster zones, construction sites and basic backyard uses," according to this story.
The recession is creating demand for wrapping some products, also helping to generate interest from people looking for jobs or supplemental income.
Mike Enos, co-founder of the company, says he has franchises in eight locations, with three more in the works. He hopes to have 30 locations by the end of 2009, and 500 nationally within five years.
Right now a franchise goes for $50,000 to $60,000, and includes training "and all supplies needed to get started -- heat guns, ladders and rolls of shrink wrap."
What plastics companies are doing the most innovative things related to the environment, sustainability and plastics recycling? One place to find out is at the annual Global Plastics Environmental Conference (GPEC), scheduled for Feb. 25-27 in Orlando, Fla.
In advance of the event, the Plastics Environmental Division of the Society of Plastics Engineers has named the winners of its GPEC 2009 Environmental Stewardship Awards. The awards recognize organizations that have demonstrated environmental leadership and excellence. Here's a list of the winners:
Cereplast Inc. of Hawthorne, Calif., for "Emerging Technologies In Materials." Cereplast developed Cereplast Hybrid Resins, a proprietary polypropylene blend with about 50% renewable additives and properties similar to traditional PP.
Mohawk Greenworks of Eton, Ga., for "Carpet/Floor/Wall Coverings Recycling." The company contributed to the 'total recycling' of post-consumer carpets, establishing small-scale (portable) recycling centers.
Western Digital of Lake Forest, Calif., for "Design for Sustainability." Collaborating with the Packaging Plus company, Western Digital developed a lightweight, efficient packaging and shipping system using recycled plastics for safe transportation of fragile computer hard-drives across the globe, reducing weight, cost, damage, and energy consumption.
KW Plastics of Troy, Ala., for "Plastics Recycling Technologies and Applications." The company pioneered efforts to set up a national paint can recycling program and developed proprietary cans made from recycled plastics.
Eagle Performance Products of Calhoun, Ga., for "Enabling Technologies in Processes and Procedures." The company insitituted a voluntary emissions control program at its plant to reduce waste and emissions from plastics additives, and it promoted such stewardship throughout its supply and customer chain.
List AG, of Arisdorf, Switzerland, for New Technologies in Processes." List developed a continuous, free radical, non-solvent polymerization process for methyl methacrylate monomer, using a unique kneader extruder system with low power consumption.
Cascade Engineering Inc. of Grand Rapids, Mich., for "New Environmental Technologies in Conventional Plastic Materials." The company manufactures wind turbines for domestic and community applications, using a recyclable engineering thermoplastic.
Braskem SA of Sao Paulo, Brazil, for "Plastic Materials from Renewable Sources." Braskem developed an innovative process for using ethanol to produce polyethylene, and the company implemented the process in a large-scale production plant.
DuPont Co. of Wilmington, Del., for "Plastic Materials from Renewable Sources." DuPont invented and produces bio-based Cerenol polyols from renewably sourced 1,3 propane diol (Bio-PDO) for use in various applications, including use as intermediates in the manufacture of several polymers.
Pace Industries of Reedsburg, Wis., for the "Chairman's Award." The company supplies recyclable/compostable sheet and film products, recycles its own and customers' plastics, has taken measures to reduce waste and energy consumption, makes use of alternative energy sources, and facilitates similar practices among its suppliers and customers in the graphic arts industry.
Peninsula Packaging Co. of Exeter, Calif., is the receipient of the "Daniel Eberhardt Environmental Award." Peninsula Packaging has established an Environmental Sustainability program that involves recycling of large amounts of post-consumer plastic bottles, converting them to sheet and containers for the packaging and food industry, and deriving a substantial part of its electricity needs from its own photovoltaic solar farms. The company also supports academic research at universities to develop tools for the post-consumer plastics industry. This award is given in recognition of Peninsula Packaging's total commitment to environmental sustainability.
Fast Company blasts chemical industry stance on BPA
Fast Company magazine has a long, detailed story on the history of the bisphenol A safety debate on its Web site. The chemical and plastics industries are right in the bulls eye, starting with the title, "The Real Story Behind Bisphenol A," and the introduction: "How a handful of consultants used Big Tobacco's tactics to sow doubt about science and hold off regulation of BPA, a chemical in hundreds of products that could be harming an entire generation."
The story doesn't require a thorough understanding of the BPA issue, although it definitely helps. It sets the stage pretty quickly, giving the history of researchers' questions about BPA, and establishing the differences in various studies ("Of the more than 100 independently funded experiments on BPA, about 90% have found evidence of adverse health effects at levels similar to human exposure. On the other hand, every single industry-funded study ever conducted -- 14 in all -- has found no such effects.")
The Harvard Center for Risk Analysis,Sciences International and Weinberg Group, three insitutions that have played a role in industry efforts to defend BPA, are singled out for criticism. One critic notes that during the period that the Harvard center studied BPA, it "acted very much like a product-defense group." The other institutions are similarly discredited.
The major contribution this story makes to the BPA debate is its effort to paint the chemical industry with the same brush as the tobacco industry, which used some of the same organizations in its efforts to discredit research on tobacco dangers.
Obviously plastics don't want to be mentioned in the same story as tobacco, so readers of Fast Company's story are going to have a strong negative reaction against BPA.
Here's the story's conclusion:
... consumers and concerned producers and retailers of BPA products are left with two options: Trust that the chemical industry has their best interests at heart, or take precautions. In its report, the NIH's National Toxicology Program advised "concerned parents" to reduce their use of canned foods; use BPA-free baby bottles; and opt for glass, porcelain, or stainless-steel containers, particularly for hot foods and liquids. Independent scientists applauded, though many of them contend that the advice should have been even more strongly worded -- and would have been, were the agency not constrained by the industry-funded science.
"The U.S. has this disjointed approach to chemicals management that doesn't focus on the inherent hazard of the chemical," says Joel Tickner, project director at the Center for Sustainable Production at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. BPA is far from the only modern-age substance whose effects we don't fully understand, and isn't the only product whose safety record has been twisted. In that way, perhaps, it may be the canary in the coal mine. And so the question looms: In our quest for progress -- and profit -- are we putting our future at risk?
Critics have high expectations that the Obama administration will push for change in how the Food and Drug Administration regulates chemicals.
To no one's surprise, Dow Chemical Co. is not going to complete its big purchase of Rohm and Haas Co. tomorrow. The two companies put out short news releases today explaining their positions.
PHILADELPHIA -- Rohm and Haas Company announced today that it has been advised by The Dow Chemical Company that Dow does not intend to close the pending acquisition of Rohm and Haas on or before Tuesday, January 27, 2009. Rohm and Haas and Dow have received all required approvals for the closing and the merger agreement requires that Dow close by such date.
Rohm and Haas stated that it intends to pursue all available alternatives to protect its shareholders' interests.
Dow has determined that recent material developments have created unacceptable uncertainties on the funding and economics of the combined enterprise. This assessment is based on several macro-economic factors such as the continued crisis in global financial and credit markets combined with the dramatic and stunning failure of Petrochemicals Industries Company of Kuwait (PIC) to fulfill its obligation to complete the formation of the K-Dow joint venture in late December 2008.
"Our long term strategy remains unchanged and the proposed acquisition of Rohm and Haas is consistent with this strategy," said Andrew N. Liveris, Chairman and CEO. Since Dow learned in late December of PIC's failure to close the K-Dow transaction, Dow has been aggressively engaged on multiple paths seeking ways to enable the Rohm and Haas transaction. Dow remains interested in discussions to find a solution to complete the acquisition of Rohm and Haas, but recent events have made closing untenable at this time.
"Dow Chemical has a long history of resiliency in responding to changing market conditions, and that resiliency continues," said Liveris, "but the world has changed significantly and we still do not see the bottom of this unprecedented demand destruction which only accelerated through the fourth quarter and brought December operating rates to historic lows. The Company's commitment to remain financially strong is part of the DNA of this 112-year old company."
Dow previously announced a series of wide-ranging actions to address global economic conditions and is accelerating those actions based on continued deteriorating demand. "We are well-prepared to take the appropriate steps to ensure we retain our options and financial flexibility to see our way through what we anticipate will be an extremely challenging year,"
said Liveris.
Meanwhile, speculation continues on whether Dow will find a new partner to take PIC's place in the K-Dow joint venture. Chemical Week is reporting that Saudi Basic Industries Corp. is in discussions with Dow. Stay tuned!
It's going to be interesting to see just how many North American plastics executives venture to New Delhi next week to participate in the subcontinent's huge, triennial plastics fest known as Plastindia. Two factors may serve to keep some people close to home -- the global economic crisis and the recent, high-profile terrorist attacks in Mumbai. But, those challenges notwithstanding, India remains one of the world's largest, most promising plastics markets.
One thing is for sure: Those who do go to the six-day exhibition will have no shortage of activities from which to choose, starting with a pre-show rotomolding conference. The Association of Rotational Molders International recently rebranded its division in the region as the Society of Asian Rotomoulders (StAR), and the group will meet Feb. 1-3 at the Hotel Park Plaza Noida. The India-China Plastics Summit also takes place on Tuesday, Feb. 3.
On Feb. 5, the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. is co-organizing the India-U.S. Plastics Trade Summit. The show organizers Plastindia Foundation also are putting on an internatiional business and technology conference on Feb. 6-7, and then the environment takes center stage on Feb. 7 with the Asian Plastic Recycling & Waste Management Conference.
The Plastindia Foundation has even turned to YouTube to promote the event, with a fast-paced, 50-second video clip. So, if you are headed to New Delhi, rest up because you'll have a hectic schedule. If you can't make it this time, stay tuned in to our (newly redesigned) PlasticsNews.com, as we will have two reporters there to gather and deliver the week’s most important news to you.
Spartech awarded LEED green building certification
Sheet extruder and compounder Spartech Corp. is proud of its new plant in Greenville, Ohio -- and now the operation is being recognized from an outside group, too. The company announced today that the U.S. Green Building Council has awarded the plant Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver certification.
LEED is USGBC’s rating system for designing and constructing green, energy-efficient buildings.
LEED certification of the Spartech plant was based on green design and construction features including installation of a cool roof, innovative wastewater technologies, and building materials with recycled content.
On Dec. 6-7, 50 Maine Plastics workers (including owner David Kaplan) joined volunteers including local scout, church and and community groups to help pack 312,500 meals for distribution to starving children throughout the world. The packaged meals consist of rice, soy protein, dehydrated vegetables and 20 vitamins and minerals mixed with vegetarian chicken flavoring.
FMSC distributes these meals to orphanages, clinics, relief centers and schools to more than 50 countries in the developing world.
Mike Dikelsky, an employee of Maine Plastics, said the event was "a tremendous success. In six packing sessions, 1513 volunteers packed 312,552 meals. This is enough food to feed 856 malnourished children one meal per day for an entire year.”
Kaplan said that he hopes that Maine Plastics can make this an annual tradition.
Congratulations to Maine Plastics, its workers and the local community for their efforts to make a difference in the world.
The story notes that Bayer wants to use a clause in its union contract that allows the company to cut wages by 10 percent while leaving working hours unchanged. The union is against the plan.
BMS isn't the first company I've seen ask for wage cuts -- others are asking workers to take time off without pay. This is definitely a trend -- companies are getting creative finding ways to cut costs without cutting staff. Is there a good way to do that, or will you always end up with an unhappy workforce?
Watch the poll question on our home page next week, where we will be asking readers how you feel about wage cuts vs. layoffs. Leave a comment on the subject here today, and make sure to vote in our poll next week.
Bloomberg news posted a speculative story today that suggests that Ineos Group Holdings, Georgia Gulf Corp. and Chemtura Corp. could be in danger of filing for bankruptcy.
“The most leveraged names are the first ones that are going to run into problems,” Andrew Brady, a New York-based analyst at CreditSights Inc., told Bloomberg. “The market knows they are struggling, and there is a huge risk of bankruptcy.”
Debt and derivatives for those three companies "are trading as if they are on the brink of bankruptcy," the report noted. "Bonds issued by closely held Ineos lost 90 cents on the euro, and credit derivatives priced in almost certain odds the company will default. Georgia Gulf bonds trade as low as 16 cents on the dollar."
The report notes that Chemtura could sell assets to avoid defaulting on its debt.
"If by the end of the first quarter, there are no deals to sell assets, the chance of bankruptcy goes up considerably," said Dmitry Silversteyn, a Longbow Research analyst in Independence, Ohio.
Ineos, Georgia Gulf and Chemtura aren't the only plastics/chemicals companies to report bad news today. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. reported that its profit in the fourth quarter dropped 95 percent. The company blamed "the decline in demand for petrochemical products and metals because of the economic recession that has hit the world's major economies, as well as the credit crunch that led to difficulties for consumers in obtaining the necessary financial facilities from banks and financial institutions."
Martin Schrager, a plastics recycling industry consultant in Boca Raton, Fla., was a college roommate of alleged investment fraud perpetrator Bernard Madoff, according to this story in The New York Times.
He was my roommate. There was nothing nefarious about the guy. When I heard years later that he was who he was, I was astonished. He never seemed like the kind of guy who could move millions on Wall Street.
I did hear about him some years later in Florida. My accountant was his accountant. I invested a small amount with him. But those were the years we had a president named James Earl Carter. Interest rates were like 18 percent. So I figured that if you put your money in the bank they gave you 18 percent and a toaster. So I took my money and got 18 percent and a toaster, too. Then he went on to infamy.
Sounds like Schrager is one of the few former Madoff investors who came out ahead.
The Canton Repository reports that Larry Snodgrass, national sales manager for Massillon, Ohio-based U.S. Chemical & Plastics, was one of the 155 passengers on US Air Flight 1549, the plane that made an emergency landing on Thursday afternoon in the icy Hudson River.
Settling in for the ride home, Snodgrass waited for when he could take out his laptop. He had only been in the air for five minutes when he heard an explosion.
From his seat near the right wing, Snodgrass could see "a huge ball of fire." He felt the plane turn, but assumed they would make it back to the airport.
"I thought it was an engine issue and that was about it," he said.
Then the captain's voice came over the cabin speakers.
"Prepare for impact."
Some passengers on the plane prayed. Children were crying.
Snodgrass said he had just enough time to turn on his Blackberry and bang out a text message to his wife, Carol, before the plane splashed into the water.
In the message, Snodgrass said he explained how the engine had exploded and the plane was going to crash. He told her how much he loved her and their two adult children.
The jet dug into the water like it was wearing cleats.
"The captain did one heck of a job with landing the aircraft," Snodgrass said.
Within moments, he was on the wing, helping other passengers into rafts. He also called Carol to tell her he was safe.
All 155 passengers survived.
U.S. Chemical & Plastics supplies products for repairing vehicle finishes, including liquid and gel resins used to bind fiberglass.
The Dalai Lama, spiritual and political leader of the Tibetan people, made "an appeal not to use plastic" to a gathering of devotees and Buddhist monks today, according to this story from The Times of India.
It clearly wasn't just an anti-plastics speech. The Dalai Lama "expressed his concern over environment degeneration and said that the uncontrolled material development and exploitation of nature was causing tremendous harm to the environment, particularly the Himalayan environment," the story says, quoting the Dalai Lama: "If things remain the same, the ancients rivers will go dry in near future."
The Dalai Lama -- who is frequently described wearing saffron robes and plastic sandals, although I can't confirm the material -- frequently speaks out on environmental issues. In fact, there's a whole section of his Web site devoted to environmental-related messages and speeches. They're worth reading.
I see criticism of plastics in print every day -- it has become so common that 95 percent of the stories aren't worth sharing in the blog. Even when celebrities speak out, I'm rarely surprised. But every once in a while, I see something noteworthy (like when Laura Bush spoke out very strongly against plastic marine debris). I think the Dalai Lama falls into the same category.
The economic downturn is now old enough that it's the subject of business books, not just business news articles. BusinessWeek magazine has a book excerpt on its Jan. 19 issue about how DuPont Co. CEO Charles Holliday Jr. reacted to the slump. The story gives him credit for rallying the troops and confronting the crisis decisively.
The first clear sign that the economic crisis was spreading globally came to DuPont CEO Chad Holliday in early October of last year, while he was visiting a major customer in Japan. The CEO of the Japanese company, among the largest and most highly regarded in its global industry, told Holliday he was worried about his company's cash position. The Japanese boss had ordered his executives to conserve cash in case the financial contagion affected his ability to raise capital.
That conversation was a wake-up call. When Holliday's plane landed back in the U.S., he immediately summoned the six top leaders in his company to a meeting at 7 a.m. the next day. He asked them the following questions: How bad is it now? How bad could it get?
So there's the time frame -- early October. Was your company holding similar meetings then? Were you taking the recession seriously? I'm sure quite a few blog readers can go back even farther, at least to this summer, when resin prices were skyrocketing without an accompanying increase in business.
Holliday decided to invoke DuPont's Corporate Crisis Management plan, which "instantly brings together senior managers to appraise the cause of the crisis and put appropriate disaster control procedures in place." The story goes on to explain the steps that Holliday and DuPont managers took with all of the company's employees, to make sure they were making the right moves. It notes that each employee was asked to identify three things they could do immediately to help conserve cash and reduce costs.
I'm looking forward to some good business books about the problems that the Big Three automakers are facing, leading up to the bailout. If anyone has a recommendation, please pass it along.
Liveris finally is starting to talk, and The Wall Street Journal has an excerpt of a Q&A interview with the CEO on its Web site today.
Some highlights:
Dow believes it might get more than the $2.5 billion breakup fee from Kuwait for pulling out of the JV. Liveris said: "We will seek remedy for the damage done to Dow and we will seek it until we get remedy and that could be multiple billions of dollars and that could be any time frame this year or beyond."
He said there is "no deadline on the Rohm and Haas deal."
Watch for Dow to make some more asset divestments, and to find a new JV partner to replace the Kuwaitis.
On that front, here's what Liveris had to say:
We've already got two prospects who are working with us already. We believe within months we'll have a replacement to the Kuwaitis. This is a highly prized asset. This two years ago was sought after by many. We went exclusive with the Kuwaitis because they were our partners and because they really wanted the deal. The fact that they didn't want the deal last week is a shame, a tragedy, but almost the same day the announcement came out, we were contacted and we believe we'll have over a dozen interested parties in our process and within a matter of a month or two, we'll be down to a couple, and within two or three months we'll have one exclusive, and sometime in the first six months of the year, we will have a monetary and strategic answer to the Kuwaitis. That is a firm go-forward path.
Mattel Inc.'s Barbie turns 50 this year -- the doll was introduced at the American International Toy Fair in New York on March 4, 1959 -- and the International Herald Tribune jumped ahead just a bit with a feature story about the icon.
There are tons of Barbie Web sites out there, so if you're interested in more information feel free to surf the 'net. Wikipedia is a good place to start -- that's where I learned that Barbie's body orginally was made of PVC, but the modern versions are ABS (although the head is still made of vinyl).
The Wall Street Journal is reporting today that LyondellBasell Industries AF may file for Chapter 11 protection from creditors. The story quotes unnamed sources who told lenders on Monday that the company "has hired bankruptcy counsel and told lenders it is trying to line up as much as $2 billion in bankruptcy financing."
Bloomberg is reporting that LyondellBasell investors "face losses of more than 90 cents on the dollar" as the company "struggles to restructure debt that financed a $12.7 billion takeover a year ago."
At this point (9 a.m. on Dec. 31), LyondellBasell has no word on the possible Chapter 11 on its Web site. The company did post a news release yesterday clarifying a Standard & Poors release, noting that LyondellBasell is not currently in default of its bank agreements.
The Chicago Tribunehad a feature story on Saturday about a reporter's effort to (sort of) live for a week without plastic. This story topic is becoming popular everywhere, it seems. As usual, the reporter doesn't really make much of an effort to live entirely without plastic. That would require giving up electricity and plumbing, healthcare and automobiles. No, the focus is on giving up packaging and disposable diapers -- and even then, reporter Trine Tsouderos discovers that living without plastics in 2008 isn't easy (or perhaps even desireable).
The story is labeled "A consumer watch special report," which seems a bit of a stretch. I guess it's "special" because Tsouderos subjected her husband and children to the pseudo no-plastic lifestyle for a whole week.
The story itself is OK, but my favorite part are the reader comments. Most are submitted anonymously, but I think I recognize a few of the authors based on their comments and writing style.
Someone with the pen name "2nd Amendment" from Sycamore, Ill., writes: "To be honest, I simply do not understand the fear of plastic? What in the world is wrong with it? Ooo... It doesn't degrade in a landfill. So what? Most things don't. What, in a few years are you expecting the landfills to become a nice pile of fluff to turn into a vegetable garden? Folks would do well to learn some real science and forget about the latest pop-culture, carbon footprint, pseudo-science that is seems to pass as fact these days."
"Reality" from Winfield, Ill., adds: "another stupid article. To go without plastic you'd have to live in a cave or tree. There is lots of plastic in every building. You couldn't drive a car, ride a bus/plane, or ride a bike. You'd have no food since it's used in the equipment to grow and harvest food and transport, refrigerate, etc. Get real!"
Someone who calls themselves "American" wrote: "I see a lot of articles like this lately, trying to live plastic free, trying to buy nothing for a year, trying to eat locally for a year, and they all end up sounding like a variation on obsessive-compulsive disorder."
There are also interesting debates among the readers about the pros and cons of plastics packaging, what living plastic-free really means, and whether the debate should actually be about America's overconsumption habit. As a result, the reader comments add depth to the story, and I encourage you to check them out.
Dow Chemical Co. is in the unusual position of explaining the advantages of its new joint venture -- K-Dow Petrochemicals -- to the news media and people of Kuwait.
Dow's partner in the joint venture is Kuwait's Petrochemical Industries Co. (PIC). The deal is scheduled to close next week -- on Jan. 1.
Despite some questions raised in the news media in the Middle East, Dow has sent signals over the past few weeks that plans for the JV are moving ahead as scheduled. This story from the Amman, Jordan-based Al Bawaba Group news site, is the latest signal. The story is basically a statement attributed to comments made by Dow Chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris, responding to issues raised about the JV.
The statement starts: "Among the accomplishments I am most proud of since becoming Dow's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 2005, has been the strong and growing economic relationship between our company and our business partners in Kuwait. ... In recent weeks there has been much discussion and debate about whether a fifth partnership to establish a new joint Kuwaiti-American company -- K-Dow Petrochemicals -- is in the long-term interest of the people of Kuwait," he said. "As the person who often sat at the table while the details of this joint venture were being settled, I know from personal experience that our Kuwaiti partners negotiated with tenacity and resolve to assure the company we were building together would be one that would be worthy of the immense talent and energy Kuwaiti men and women who would become its foundation."
The article then goes into some detail explaining that the deal was "thoroughly and fairly negotiated," offers "exceptional value," and will be good to Kuwait. It also includes a list of how Dow has been a generous corporate citizen to Kuwait, and an explanation of the materials that K-Dow will make.
The terms of the deal are the focus of much of the report. It certainly seems unusual that Dow's CEO is spending time explaining how PIC's executives got a good deal in their negotiations with Dow.
A story on Bloomberg.com today helps to explain Liveris' statement. It notes that a group of Kuwaiti opposition lawmakers calling themselves the Popular Action Bloc is urging Prime Minister Sheikh Nasser al-Mohammed al-Sabah to kill the JV, "saying the investment was ill-timed and doesn't benefit the nation. Kuwait's cabinet yesterday debated whether to proceed with the venture and planned to make a final decision today, the Kuwait Times reported, citing sources it didn't identify."
As was the case in the blog item I posted on K-Dow a month ago, I still don't think the K-Dow deal is in danger of falling apart. Chemicals are a cyclical business, and the near-term outlook for joint ventures like this are going to have their ups and downs.
Honoring the inventor of the plastic toothpaste tube
Do you know who invented the first plastic toothpaste tube? According to this story in the Lowell Sun, it was Westford, Mass., plastics expert Roger Brandt, who died on Dec. 8 at age 88.
Brandt worked for American National Can Co., which is where he invented the plastic toothpaste tube back in the 1960s.
"Before plastic tubes, they were all aluminum or lead," said Brandt's daughter, Betsy Nahas, a science teacher at Chelmsford High School. "For a long time, people said it was no big deal, the tubes didn't include the lead ion that makes you sick. Procter & Gamble was ready to reject the plastic tube, when a new report showed you could get lead poisoning from the (old) tubes. Procter & Gamble called Dad the next day, and asked, how many tubes can you deliver tomorrow?"
His reward?
"It was like any company," said Nahas. "A slap on the back, here's 50 bucks, what are you going to do for an encore? You sign away intellectual property rights to the company you work for."
Thanks to the Sun, and to Nahas, for sharing that story today.
Computer company Dell Inc. wants to be "the greenest technology company on the planet," and today announced a green-packaging strategy that it said would help save $8 million and approximately 20 million pounds of packaging material over the next four years.
One of the interesting angles: Dell will replace foam with air-filled cushions, molded pulp cushions, and thermoformed cushions made from 100 percent recycled high density polyethylene. In the next year, Dell estimates that it will use an estimated 33 million recycled milk jugs to make packaging for its desktops and laptops.
"We're challenging every technology company to join us in implementing a global green packaging strategy," said Tod Arbogast, director of Sustainable Business at Dell. “In doing so, we will drive extraordinary environmental and cost savings for our businesses and customers while setting a new efficiency model for other industries to follow.”
If there's one thing that makes me vomit in my mouth, it's plastic gadgets painted silver.
It's not the plastic. I like plastic fine. And painting with other colors, that's ok, too. It's just that the overriding reason for painting a plastic device silver is to make it look like metal. It's stupid! And it needs to stop as surely as wooden panels on station wagons needed to stop 30 years ago and why tofurky is a totally unacceptable replacement for either turkey or tofu.
He blames the trend on cellphone designers, noting that now the cheapest devices on the market are made of silver-painted plastic, and the best are made of real metal.
Yes, the methods of turning a hunk of plastic into a shiny thing is getting better, so these piece-o-craps look better than ever close up. But contextually, they're not fooling anyone with half a brain. Everyone, everyone, EVERYONE knows that when they see a huge silver TV, even from 30 feet away, it's probably not made of metal but rather coated with Pantone 877c. And that overly curvy designs are likely plastic sprayed with paint. And mainstream gadgets, like PSPs and DVD players made in China, well, those things are too chintzy to ever get the full metal treatment. They're not worth their weight in metal.
Interesting point. Designers want to make stuff that sells, of course. But painting plastic to make it look like metal does seem to miss taking advantage of the unique qualities of the plastic. What do you think -- is the silver-painted plastic trend on its last legs?
When Clorox Co. announced last month that it would set up a system to accept used Brita water filters for recycling, it was the culmination of an effort by a blogger who started putting pressure on the company in June 2007.
This story in Canada's National Post tells the story of Beth Terry, author of the Fake Plastic Fish blog, who used the Web site to start a petition to urge the company to set up a program to recycle the filters.
When Terry -- who lives in Oakland, Calif., and keeps track of all the plastic she purchases and discards as part of her green blog -- realized she couldn't recycle her filter, she decided to email Brita and ask why. In return, she got a standard form letter explaining there was a lack of recycling infrastructure available in the U.S.
"I sent another email after that," says Terry, "asking why Brita was able to build its own facility in Europe but not here, and then I didn't really get anything from them, so I just kind of blogged about it and ranted, then eventually let it go."
Some time later, however, when she was checking her Google analytics to see what search terms had directed people to her site, Terry noticed the words "Brita" and "recycling" came up a lot. This prompted her to ask around and see if there was interest in starting a campaign, and so began the process of letters, petitions, websites and meetings with various environmental organizations.
The story notes that Clorox's campaign "began with a single, frustrated woman not knowing how to get rid of her water filter and ended with massive structural change at a multinational corporation in just months."
Pretty amazing. No wonder more companies and trade groups are starting to pay attention to the role that bloggers play in informing the public.
Remember the contest that Telluride, Mountain Village and Aspen, Colo., had this summer, where they encouraged residents to use reusable grocery bags instead of disposables? Now the contest to being expanded to as many as 24 other ski towns in Colorado, and it will cover all of 2009.
That's the story from the Summit Daily News in Frisco, Colo., which reports that the voluntary challenge among the Colorado Association of Ski Towns could prevent the use of nearly 7 million single-use plastic bags.
Participating towns are asking local groceries and other retailers to keep track of how many reusable bags are used, and to make a 5 cent donation for each bag to an environmental education fund.
This is such a better idea than a bag ban or a tax. Consumers can participate in the contest, and perhaps even get a small rebate from the store for using using reusable bags -- but the stores can still hand out disposable bags, which are handy for people who reuse them or who forget to bring their reusable bags.
The Society of Plastics Engineers plans to present its first "virtual" conference on March 5-6. The idea is that in a down economy, processors can still get the benefits of attending a conference without taking a hit on their travel budget.
Gain access to other popular pre-recorded webinars
Network and converse with fellow attendees and presenters in the “Virtual Lounge”
Visit exhibitors’ virtual booths and “virtually talk” with booth representatives in the “Virtual Exhibit Hall”
Continue to learn and network in the “Virtual Conference Hall” for 30 days following the live event
“Plastics professionals typically do a fair amount of traveling during the course of a year,” explains Elizabeth Reagan, SPE’s online program developer. “This conference gives them an excellent alternative -- without the stress and expense of traveling -- to learn, network, and exchange ideas with peers who have the same plastics-related interests.”
It will be interesting to see how the virtual conference works. Have blog readers attended many Webinars, online tradeshows or virtual conferences?
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is reporting today that President-elect Obama will meet next week with a coalition of health advocates that want to ban bisphenol A.
The story notes that "the fact that Obama's team is willing to meet now -- with all the other pressures facing the incoming administration," is significant. The meeting has been set, but participants gave the newspaper few details "because they say they do not want to call it to the attention of chemical manufacturers."
Activists say chemical makers, led by the American Chemistry Council, have too much influence over government policy.
It will be interesting to see exactly what sort of ban the activists want. Most of the concerns to date have been about polycarbonate in infant products and refillable sport-drink bottles (and epoxy used to line metal cans). But more recently, the newspaper has raised concern about housewares products, too.
Did you know there are blogs devoted almost entirely to criticizing plastics? I stumbled across a few today that I had not seen before, thanks to a story in Mother Jones.
The story is about the "new ascetics" -- activists (and, typically, authors) in the mold of Henry David Thoreau, who try to live in ways that have minimum impact on the earth. It's an interesting story, and here's the passage that sent me to an anti-plastics blog:
In all of these self-deprivation experiments, there comes a moment when self-denial becomes self-defeating. An Internet entrepreneur from San Diego named Dave Bruno has received a lot of back pats for his "100 Thing Challenge," a goal to limit his possessions to that magic number. It's a useful thought experiment, but do shoes count as one thing, or should each shoe count as a separate item? The point -- how much crap do you really need? -- can quickly get lost in the details. Ascetics often become distracted by the rules or take things too far. Consider the fervent subculture of people who try to live plastic-free lives. Another perfectly worthy goal, but then you stumble upon advice like this on the blog PlasticLess.com: "Get a Vasectomy: Children are the target market for pointless plastic stuff. Most temporary forms of birth control involve some plastic packaging." (Uh, okay.)
So I decided to check out PlasticsLess.com, and found a blog with pretty frequent posts dating back to May 2007. The author (who doesn't seem to have a page explaining who he or she is, or why the blog exists) has posted on topics including marine debris, bag bans, BPA safety. But the overlying theme is that people should use less plastics stuff. It's interesting that it's specifically less plastic stuff -- some of the posts highlight products that aren't made of plastics that people can buy instead of plastic varieties.
That blog included links to "The Great Plastic Challenge, Eliminating plastic from our lives...one week at a time," and "Life Less Plastic," a blog about a Chicago woman's "quest to protect the environment and my health by reducing the amount of plastic" that she uses every day. (Check out her list of "What I'm doing to be mostly plastic-free.")
Thanks to Mother Jones for sending us on this look at the "fervent subculture of people who try to live plastic-free lives."
There's an interesting item tucked away in A. Schulman Inc.'s recently released proxy statement, dated Nov. 24, that's getting some attention from investing blogs today. It's the news that Schulman this year sold a Canadian fish camp to Terry Haines, the company's former president and CEO, for $55,000.
Proxies often make for dry reading, but this one is pretty interesting. Here's the relevant passage:
During fiscal 2008, the Compensation Committee determined that maintaining a lease on a private airplane was no longer a cost-effective method for providing business-related transportation to our Named Executive Officers and Directors. The airplane was used only for business-related travel, and personal use was not permitted. With the termination of the lease on the airplane, it also became increasingly difficult and cost prohibitive to access our Canadian fish camp. Consequently, the fish camp, which was only used for business entertainment purposes, was offered for sale during 2008. The only offer to purchase the fish camp came from Terry L. Haines, our former Chief Executive Officer and President. Ultimately we negotiated with Mr. Haines to sell the fish camp for a purchase price of $55,000 and the transaction closed during fiscal year 2009.
I imagine there are some blog readers out there -- big Schulman customers -- who were visitors to the fish camp. Perhaps they can share some photos or information about the camp with the rest of us. Was it worth $55,000? Some of the investing blogs would be very interested in your comments. The Toronto Globe and Mail's Market Blog calls the filing A fishy footnote. Michelle Leder of footnoted.org calls it "Gone fishing -- seriously," adding:
There’s so much to poke at here that I almost don’t know where to begin: The leased airplane for business purposes only? The fishing camp in Canada? The fact that the airplane was no longer necessary because the fishing camp was sold? The sale of the fishing camp to the former CEO? The bargain basement price? Clearly, this is in the running for footnote of the year.
Plastic bag taxes are making a rare (up to now, at least) foray into the heartland: The mayor of Toledo, Ohio, has proposed a tax, similar to the plan offered last week by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Reaction from the city council was mixed. District Councilman Lindsay Webb called it "crazy," adding "I think we have had enough with the garbage fee, and I will not support another increase in fees for people."
Councilman Joe McNamara supports the idea, offering some commonly held misconceptions about plastic bags in the process:
"The plastic bags are petroleum-based and they take up a lot of space in our landfill," he said. "Anything that ultimately saves the landfill will save the taxpayers money."
Attention Toledo taxpapers: don't expect to start saving tons of money on those landfill costs anytime soon.
The New York Times' Green Inc. business blog is reporting today that in 2009, the Times will begin using PolyGreen biodegradable bags to protect its newspapers shipped around the country. The bags, from GP Plastics Corp., are supposed to degrade in an open environment within a few months, "and within two to three years when in a landfill," according to a Times spokeswoman.
She said the Times is the "first national newspaper to commit to using this environmentally friendly bag. While this new bag is more expensive, we believe it is an important change to make."
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel continued its "Watchdog report" series on bisphenol A safety this weekend. The newest wrinkle: the results of lab tests on containers either marketed for infants or billed as microwave-safe.
According to the story, the 10 products tested release "toxic doses" of BPA when heated.
If regulators agree with the "toxic" defiinition -- and if the lab results are accurate -- it could extend the issue of BPA safety beyond polycarbonate baby bottles and reusable sport drink containers.
"The newspaper's test results raise new questions about the chemical and the safety of an entire inventory of plastic products labeled as 'microwave safe,'" the story says. "The newspaper tests also revealed that BPA, commonly thought to be found only in hard, clear plastic and in the lining of metal food cans, is present in frozen food trays, microwaveable soup containers and plastic baby food packaging."
Frederick vom Saal, the University of Missouri researcher who has kept a spotlight on BPA safety for the past decade, oversaw the Journal Sentinel's testing. He's quoted in the story saying: "There is no such thing as safe microwaveable plastic."
Some manufacturers quoted in the story dispute that conclusion. The story quotes John Faulkner, director of brand communications for Campbell Soup Co., who wrote: "These levels are EXTREMELY low. In fact, you might just be able to find similar levels in plain old tap water due to "background" levels. We are talking 40 to 60 parts per trillion (ppt). What is 40 to 60 ppt? 40 to 60 seconds in 32,000 years! Essentially, these levels have absolutely no relevance in terms of human risk."
Rubbermaid, for example, notes that "BPA is used in a small fraction of our products including Premier to provide the clarity and stain & odor resistance consumers desire. Based on numerous thorough, empirical scientific studies and the positions taken by major regulatory authorities from around the globe, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Union, we continue to believe Bisphenol A is safe in our applications." But the company goes on to say that the company has a new page on its Web site to help consumers "easily identify which Rubbermaid food and beverage containers do and do not contain BPA, to help consumers choose alternatives if they wish."
It looks like BPA safety issues are getting ready to leap into new segments of the packaging and housewares markets. It will be interesting to see how companies respond.
Bag bans and taxes continue to pop up across the country, but defenders of plastic bags can point to a victory in Red Bank, N.J., where the borough council decided to drop a proposed ban on Monday. The Asbury Park Press reported on the move today, noting that the decision came after a "spirited debate."
The story notes that the proposal has been in discussion for almost 10 months. It would have banned plastic bags starting July 1.
Once again, an industry promise to step up bag recycling efforts was an important part of the arsenal. Donna Dempsey of the American Chemistry Council's Progressive Bag Affiliates spoke at the meeting, arguing that "A better approach is to sit down with people who know plastic bags, recycling, stores and solid waste."
Meanwhile, as I noted, plastic bag legislation is continuing to spread. In Toronto, where city officials are discussing a new packaging proposal, a group of elementary school kids are going to speak to the city council's works committee today to push for a bag ban, according to this story from the Globe and Mail.
"When we're adults, we want a clean world, we don't want it polluted all over with plastic bags and whatnot," said David Cash, 11.
Their teacher, former human-rights lawyer Harriet Simand, says the exercise has taught the children about organizing to fight for a cause.
"They have a very clear sense of right and wrong," Ms. Simand said. "Sometimes adults need to hear it."
It seems fitting to see 11-year-olds take up the issue. Watching the plastics industry battle against bag bans already seems like watching a kid play Whac-A-Mole. Whenever they knock one down, another pops up somewhere else.
Popular Mechanics magazine's Web site has a fun feature today, "Recycling Myths: PM Debunks 5 Half Truths about Recycling." It's always interesting for me to see what magazines like Popular Mechanics are saying about plastics, so I'll share the publication's Myth No. 5: "Most of the plastic put in recycling bins ends up in the garbage."
This one is true now, but changing quickly. Sorting plastics is tricky for recycling processors. Bottles can't be separated out with a magnet; small pieces like coffee-cup lids get flattened and mixed into paper bales; bags get caught in the spinning disks of sorting equipment, forcing frequent shut-downs. Trying to decode the recycling numbers on plastic products is also a pain for consumers.
As a result, it's true that most of the plastic we use does end up in landfill sites. Less than 1 percent of polystyrene containers (e.g. yogurt pots) are recycled, and even well-established recyclables like PET (e.g. soft-drink bottles) end up in the trash more than two-thirds of the time. But the problem isn't that recycling programs are dumping recyclable plastic into the trash -- it's that they don't accept the plastics in the first place.
That problem is on the way out, though. This spring, San Francisco announced that its pioneering recycling program would begin accepting all rigid plastic, including anything from yogurt pots and clamshell containers to plastic toys and buckets. Other cities are also expanding the range of plastics they accept. New technology makes this feasible: Optical sorters use infrared light to instantly identify the chemical composition of a container, then a puff of air directs it into the right pile.
Recyclers also have to find a market for plastics once they're sorted -- and that's starting to happen, too. San Francisco recently signed a deal to sell rigid 5-gal buckets, common in construction, to a company that will turn them into artificial lumber for landscaping.
The information about sortation isn't really new. Big PET recyclers have been using sophisticated sortation equipment -- like the technology described here -- for over a decade.
I don't think it's really fair to say that this myth "is true now." Obviously most plastic thrown away in the U.S. today ends up in landfills, and the numbers PM cites are accurate. But that's not the same as saying that "most of the plastic put in recycling bins ends up in the garbage." Sure, consumers throw stuff in their recycling bins that communities don't want, and that ends up being thrown away. But is that the majority of plastics?
I suspect that most of the plastic put into recycling bins are PET and HDPE bottles, and there is definitely a market for those containers.
So the bottom line is that PM is right, it is a myth that most plastic put in recycling bins ends up in the garbage. They also happen to be wrong, because the first sentence of the article contradicts the headline.
Thanks to PN colleague Kathie Case for pointing out this story today.
This week the American Chemistry Council kicked off a blog summit on energy efficiency, which will cover some topics that are very important to readers of this blog. The summit is located at www.benefitsofplastics.com, and the trade group is calling this effort its "inaugural foray into social media."
The event will take place from Nov. 5-23, and will cover topics including the role of plastics in the advancement of energy efficient products. I'm one of the summit panelists -- others include Randy Dearth, the president and CEO of Lanxess; Chris Pappas, the president and COO of Nova Chemicals; Sara DeLucia of Bayer MaterialScience AG; Bob Lilienfeld, editor of the ULS [Use Less Stuff] Report; and Rita Schenk, executive director of the Institute for Environmental Research and Education.
The general public can participate too, through moderated comment boards. So check it out and let us know what you think. I'll watch for opportunities to link to some good discussions.
The city of Toronto is preparing to release a report on ways to reduce packaging waste. The news could come as soon as tomorrow. But while the proposal has not been released yet, it is already generating attention, especially from representatives of the plastics industry that worry that their products could be banned.
The Globe and Mail newspaper wrote last week: "Many options are in play, such as an outright ban on materials used in food takeout, a tax on plastic bags, a city deposit-return program, encouragement for customers to leave packaging at the store and, there's that word again, a ban on bottled water at city facilities." (Sorry, that story is behind a pay wall).
The story quotes city councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, identified as one of the forces behind the proposal, saying: "I think it is appropriate to consider banning things that cannot be recycled," but adding that "polystyrene would not fall into that [category]."
Still, some in industry are concerned, and today they announced the formation of a "coalition on city in-store food packaging source reduction" that has requested a meeting with Mayor David Miller to discuss the plan.
The coalition presents its case in a news release today: "Businesses with expertise in food retailing and food distribution want to ensure their voice and expert opinion is heard. Food packaging is a very complex subject and decisions related to it cannot be solely dictated by waste diversion concerns. ... Business and industry are calling on the City to use voluntary approaches and to exercise caution. Heavy emphasis on taxes, environmental fees, deposits, and licensing restrictions to force reduction could have a number of unintended negative consequences that could end up hurting residents, consumers, retailers and ultimately the City with a marginal environmental win."
Add Dell Inc. to the list of computer and office equipment makers that are touting materials-related choices in their marketing efforts. The company today announced that its new OptiPlex 960 desktop PCs have at least 10 pecent post-consumer plastic in the housing.
"That’s about the equivalent of three plastic water bottles,” Curtis Campbell, the OptiPlex’s product manager, told earth2tech.com. The line of green PCs is aimed mostly at institutional buyers, according to the Web site.
It will be interesting to see which plastic wins the hearts and minds of environmentally minded office product buyers -- recycled content like Dell is using, or biopolymers like Canon Inc.
Plastic card maker CPI Card Group Inc. is on board the sustainability bandwagon with a line of biodegradable PVC cards using a material that it calls bioPVC. U.S. Bank announced yesterday that it has started offering gas cards made of the material to customers in the company's Fleet Systems Inc. program.
A news release from U.S. Bank quotes Michael Oleniczek, senior vice president, saying: "Our clients are increasingly concerned about selecting products and services that have less impact on the environment. We expect these cards to be extremely popular."
CPI has produced millions of bioPVC cards. The cards are made of 99 percent PVC, and biodegrades in nine months to five years in soil, water, compost, or wherever microorganisms are present.
CPI Card Group VP of sales Bob Clarke added: "The finished card performs equal to cards manufactured on regular PVC as no biodegradation takes place unless the product is in a fertile environment such as compost."
CPI Card Group also offers cards made of NatureWorks PLA, as well as cards made with recycled content ranging from 25-100 percent.
I'm curious about how these cards made of alternative materials will catch on. On one hand, I recognize that credit card recycling programs have limited appeal -- the volumes would be too small to handle, and consumers would never risk sending old cards to be recycled. So the idea of having a card that won't be around for decades, if not centuries, must appeal to some consumers.
On the other hand, how many people are going to send cards to composting facilities? If you cut them up and put them in the trash, are they really going to biodegrade if they end up in a landfill?
If you're wondering, the volume of plastic cards manufactured each year is pretty significant. According to the International Card Manufacturers Association, 19.2 billion cards were made in 2007, which is up 12 percent over 2006. North America is the largest card unit market, with more than 9.1 billion cards manufactured in 2007.
How's that for an alphabet soup headline? But the story itself looks quite serious: the Milwaukee Journal Sentinelreported yesterday that it may have discovered the reason that the Food and Drug Administration has taken the position that bisphenol A is safe for food packaging.
It's because the American Chemistry Council and the American Plastics Council helped do FDA's research.
"Although the Food and Drug Administration will not reveal who prepared its draft, the agency's own documents show that the work was done primarily by those with the most to gain by downplaying concerns about the safety of the chemical," according to the report by Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger. "That includes Stephen Hentges, executive director of the American Chemistry Council's group on bisphenol A, who commissioned a review of all studies of the neurotoxicity of bisphenol A and submitted it to the FDA. The FDA then used that report as the foundation for its evaluation of the chemical on neural and behavioral development."
According to the Journal Sentinel story, a U.S. House subcommittee is asking FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach about the issue. It quotes from a letter the subcommittee sent to FDA, asking "Specifically, why industry-funded studies provide the basis of your regulatory decisions and why the totality of the science around the chemical continues to be ignored by your science-based agency."
The story includes ACC's side, but saves the reaction to the last three paragraphs. It quotes ACC spokeswoman Tiffany Harrington saying that Hentges was acting appropriately in his capacity as an advocate for the plastics industry.
"We are a stakeholder just like anyone else," she told the newspaper. "It's part of the process."
It certainly makes sense to include input from manufacturers in the regulatory process. After all, they have a lot of expertise. But how can they contribute without commercial interests getting in the way, or without accusations of having a conflict of interest?
Experts can disagree about whether toys can safely contain certain phthalates. But that's no excuse for the lack of sound judgment exhibited by some of the people featured in today's Wall Street Journal story, "Toys Containing Banned Plastics Still on Market."
The angle: there's a flood of toys hitting stores nationwide that contain phthalates, because some retailers are rushing to sell them before a Feb. 10 ban takes effect.
Consumers will see "toys marked down at a discount without knowing that they contain a substance that will be banned in February," Elizabeth Hitchcock of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group told the newspaper.
A spokeswoman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission defended the practice, telling the WSJ that Congress did not deem phthalates unsafe, but only banned future sales.
Here are some questions to consider.
If CPSC doesn't think Congress thought these toys were unsafe, why does it think they banned future sales?
If Congress thinks the toys aren't safe, yet retailers are trying to push them out the door now (just ahead of the Christmas shopping season), what will they do if some lawyers decide that would make an interesting class-action lawsuit?
And if Congress thinks these toys are unsafe, why did they allow retailers to continue to sell them until Feb. 10? These are toy ducks and teethers we're talking about, not life-saving medicines.
The lack of common sense is, apparently, contagious.
You may have heard that Wal-Mart Stores Inc. plans to cut back its plastic bag waste by one-third by 2013. It should come as no surprise that some people don't think that's fast enough.
Winston isn't a radical environmentalist (not that there's anything wrong with that...) -- he's the type of expert who companies like Wal-Mart hire to give them advice on how to deal with sustainability issues. So his opinions carry a lot of weight with many in the business community.
Here, in part, is what Winston had to say:
I'm generally a fan of doing something now and getting moving. But I found myself thinking at the Wal-Mart announcement about much larger goals. Instead of targeting one-third of plastic waste by 2013, why not eliminate all plastic bags by then, or eliminate half by next year? It's been done before. IKEA put a small charge (a nickel) on bags and eliminated 90% in one year in multiple countries. ...
In the case of bags, Wal-Mart and other retailers are setting up recycling programs in stores. The efforts strike me as a bit onerous and expensive. It seems possible that going for a much larger change -- through, for example, an IKEA-like charge to signal to customers the behavior change desired, or a Whole-Foods-like rebate for bringing your own bag -- may actually save a ton of money and effort. It may be counterintuitive that a larger initiative could be cheaper, but it's worth pursuing. Of course charging customers has some downsides, but Wal-Mart could make the shift more palatable by funneling proceeds to good causes in the community.
I imagine that some plastics industry folks would disagree, since setting up in-stores bag recycling is the centerpiece in most efforts to save plastic bags from being taxed or banned.
Winston will focus on plastics more on Nov. 6, when he gives a keynote speech at the Sustain 08 conference in Chicago. The event is sponsored by Plastics News and the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.
It will be interesting to see how Winston spins the get-rid-of-plastic-bags message in front of that crowd.
Toyota Motor Corp. plans to replace 20 percent of the plastics used in its automobiles with bioplastics by 2015, according to this story from Nikkei Business Publications Inc.'s Tech-On! news Web site.
Toyota's Masatoshi Matsuda announced the goal at the BioJapan 2008 conference, held Oct. 15-7 in Yokohama. The report notes that Toyota has been cautious about using bioplastics. In 2003, it started making the spare tire cover and floor mat for the Raum from a composite material made of polylactic acid and kanaf. (The Raum is sold only in Japan).
"We have not used bioplastics for any of our cars since then," Matsuda said. "We are not ready to use more bioplastics in view of the balance between the cost and the performances such as properties and formability."
But the company will start to use more bioplastics -- starting with interior parts -- in order to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, he said.
My experience with Japanese OEMs is that they're serious about these sorts of pledges -- and they often underpromise and then overdeliver. So 20 percent may not seem huge, and 2015 may seem like quite a few years from now, but I wouldn't be surprised to see progress toward meeting this goal a lot sooner.
Until now, the great bottled vs. tap water debate has largely been a decision left to personal preference. Sure, some communities have stopped buying bottled water. But those decisions haven't affected bottled water sales much -- they've just meant some cities took bottled water from city hall vending machines, or stopped selling water at community events.
But in Florida, the debate might be getting a bit louder, now that Miami-Dade county has gone on the offensive with a 30-second radio ad that slams bottled water. Nestle Waters North America is considering fighting back, according to this story in The Miami Herald.
In the radio ad, a talking faucet extols Miami-Dade's tap water as cheaper, purer and safer than bottled water.
It may have sounded innocuous to most listeners, but the 30-second spot left the nation's largest purveyor of bottled water boiling mad.
Nestle Waters North America, which makes nearly $4 billion a year selling Zephyrhills and other brands, is threatening to sue if the county doesn't kill commercials the company brands as false advertising.
''It's an attack on the integrity of the company,'' said Nestle spokesman Jim McClellan. ``It's an attack on the product we produce -- and it's blatantly wrong.''
The county paid $100,000 for the radio ads, which John Renfrow, director of the Water and Sewer Department, told the Herald were aimed at educating the area's immigrant population, many from countries where tap water is not safe.
"'This is your water faucet speaking, " the ad says. "You think bottled water is purer and safer? You think it's better? Well, you're wrong. It's just the opposite. Bottled water is not regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency. Tap water is. That's why you always can be sure Miami-Dade tap water is superior. Stop wasting your money!"
Nestle responded by testing Miami-Dade's water -- it claims the results show the samples exceed federal standards for fecal coliform -- and sent complaints to the county and the state attorney general.
"'When you make a statement and say your water is better than our water, we want to find out," Kevin Mathews, director of health and environmental affairs for Nestle, told the Herald.
So now the gloves are off. Nestle has shown that its willing to step up and take legal action when bottled water comes under attack, even when its own brands aren't specifically named. I don't think the response will put an end to this debate, but it may discourage some cities from taking aggressive anti-bottled water stands.
Canada's news media is reporting today that the federal government there is set to add bisphenol A to its list of "toxic substances" tomorrow. According to this Toronto Globe and Mail report, the move will make Canada " the first country in the world to take such aggressive action against the controversial chemical."
What will this mean? According to the story, "Declaring the synthetic chemical toxic opens the way for regulatory action, and the government has already announced that it wants to ban plastic baby bottles made from the chemical and work with food and packing companies to reduce the amounts leaching out of tin cans into infant formula."
The decision isn't a surprise -- Health Canada and Environment Canada revealed the draft proposal back in April, which touched off a flurry of activiity. Big retailers in Canada have already stopped selling polycarbonate baby bottles. But we can expect to see another barrage of news stories this weekend as a result of the move, and increasing pressure on other governments to adopt the same strict policy.
Canon Inc. and Apple Computer Inc. made headlines this week for materials-related choices in their electronics products. One of the companies chose to work with bio-based plastics, while one the other trumpeted a move away from plastics.
Canon announced that it had developed a new bio-based plastic that will be used in exterior plastic parts for office products that will be launched early next year. Canon worked with Toray Industries Inc. to develop the material, called "Ecodear." The resin is based on polylactic acid, according to a report in our sister publication Plastics & Rubber Weekly.
"Particularly in the area of flame retardance, Ecodear is the world's first bio-based plastic applicable for use in multifunction office systems to achieve 5V classification under the UL 94 flammability testing program," Canon said in a news release. "Compared with conventional petroleum-based plastics used in multifunction office systems, the new bio-based plastic developed by Canon and Toray offers an expected reduction in manufacturing-related CO2 emissions of approximately 20 percent. The development of the new bio-based plastic will enable its use not only for select parts in multifunction office systems, but also for replacing petroleum-based plastics used for exterior parts, which require a high level of flame retardance."
Apple went the plastics-avoidance route, introducing a new line of MacBook laptops with aluminum unibody enclosures. The move has been rumored all summer, so it wasn't a big surprise. But it still seemed like the announcement generated quite a bit of news coverage.
“Apple has invented a whole new way of building notebooks from a single block of aluminum. And, just as important, they are the industry’s greenest notebooks,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO.
Greenpeace, which has been pressuring Apple to change its material usage, praised the move -- not specifically because of the switch from plastics to aluminum, but for continuing to move away from PVC and brominated flame retardants.
"The new MacBook's are a major step forward," said Greenpeace's Zeina Alhajj. "The models are still not entirely free of PVC, but they mark an industry first in having a BFR-free motherboard. Apple is now setting standards for other manufacturers to follow."
Those MacBooks still carry a premium price, so don't expect the competition to follow the leader and switch to aluminum.
I think it will be interesting to see how Canon's PLA products sell next year -- and how much the material choice is featured in the company's marketing efforts.
The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s blog is live and ready for prime time, so go take a look. It's located at plasticsindustry.blogspot.com, and it's called "In the Hopper."
Barry Eisenberg at SPI is the primary author/poster, but others (including SPI President and CEO Bill Carteaux) can and will post items.
It looks like they've been posting on a wide variety of topics during the warm-up period, including energy policy, sustainability, and some general-interest items. There's also a blog roll with links to other plastics-specifics blogs.
This should be an interesting site to watch. Welcome to blogland, SPI.
The Toronto Globe and Mail boils the phthalate safety issue down to the essence with this alarming headline today: "Plastics ingredient linked to smaller penises."
I've seen that angle emphasized before on other Web sites, but this is the first time I've seen it from a mainstream newspaper. Most have danced around the subject, but wouldn't "go there." (I hesitated to link to it myself, but I assume that my blog readers are mature adults who are interested in how the media is portraying plastics issues).
The story notes that researchers are looking at that angle because studies of male mice have suggested that some phthalates may have "the peculiar ability to shorten the space between the anus and the genitalia," known as the anogenital distance or AGD. "For mice, AGD is considered a measure of masculinity and a way to determine the sex of the pups. Scientists are so confident of the effect that they've given the impact of the chemical on male rodents a name -- phthalate syndrome," according to the Globe and Mail story.
This story was the result of a study published in the journal Environmental Research by a team led by Shanna Swan, director of the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology at the University of Rochester's school of medicine.
Swan's report was based on human research -- an examination of 106 U.S. boys, and "is among the first to raise the possibility that phthalate syndrome may also be at work in humans, because it found pregnant women with the highest amount of phthalates were markedly more likely to give birth to boys who had shorter anogenital distances."
The story concludes with this information:
Dr. Swan cautioned that the research was conducted on a relatively small number of boys, and the findings need to be independently verified by other investigators. It also isn't known what effect, if any, the chemical might have on the fertility of the boys, later in life, because the group would need to be followed into adulthood.
Nonetheless, Dr. Swan said she believes labelling laws need to be strengthened to allow consumers to choose whether to buy products or packaging that contain phthalates.
Cosmetics often contain phthalates, but the chemical isn't specifically mentioned because it is included in other listed items, such as fragrances.
Dr. Swan says she tries to buy phthalate-free cosmetics and doesn't store or microwave food in plastic containers, among other steps, to minimize her own exposure.
It is no surprise that The New York Timesrecently editorialized in favor of the plastic bag ban in Westport, Conn. After all, we noted back in September that Westport resident David Pogue, technology columnist for the Times, spoke in favor of the ban at a public meeting and told the crowd: “...if you pass it, I’ll write about it ....”
It looks like he kept his promise.
Here's an excerpt from the newspaper's recent editorial on the topic:
Americans use and dispose of at least 100 billion bags every year. Although the plastics industry points out that plastic grocery bags are made more from natural gas than petroleum, natural gas is not a renewable resource and contributes to global warming. And about only 5 percent of all plastic bags are recycled nationwide. The rest end up in the trash, hanging in trees or floating in water where they menace marine life.
There are other possible remedies, including a constructive idea that has taken hold in Ireland. In 2002, Ireland became the first country in the world to impose a tax on plastic bags. Use of the bags dropped by 90 percent, and proceeds from the tax went to environmental causes.
If Ireland is any guide, tax laws may have greater impact on human behavior than recycling laws. Tax law could also be written to apply to an entire state, thus eliminating the need for town-by-town bans.
Today the Times' Web site has publised two letters to the editor in response to that editorial -- including one opposed to bag taxes. The counterpoint comes from Cal Dooley, president and CEO of the American Chemistry Council. Here's what he has to say:
We all want a cleaner environment, and based on the facts, your editorial misses the mark.
Bans and taxes penalize consumers and are not effective at preventing litter or enhancing our environment. Instead, consumers buy new bags to replace the grocery bags, because 92 percent of consumers reuse plastic grocery bags for a variety of household purposes. Ireland’s tax actually led to a 400 percent increase in the purchase of other types of plastic bags.
Moreover, plastic-bag bans generally increase demand for paper bags, increase energy use by 70 percent and double greenhouse gas emissions.
The more environmentally sustainable solution is to promote recycling. Plastic bag and film recycling grew 24 percent in 2006, and is being embraced from coast to coast, from California to New York City and Rhode Island.
Plastics are a valuable resource -- too valuable to waste -- and should be recycled. Let’s work together to promote recycling.
I think Dooley's response was on target. Recycling is the solution, and ACC (as well as communities and retailers) need to play a role. But, obviously, there's a lot more to be said on the topic. What other points should he have made?
Here's an attention-getting idea for plastics recyclers that are looking for some attention from their local media: a company in Tempe, Ariz., has set up a program to recycle campaign signs after election day.
Most of the signs are made out of corrugated plastic sheet, so there's obviously some value to the material. So Plastics General Inc. is willing to grind old signs and sell the material to processors to make new products, according to this story from The Arizona Republic.
"There are a lot of applications for these materials," Bill Wiess, ombudsman for Plastics General, told the newspaper. "It's a renewable resource and it's better than a landfill."
The company has even set up drop-off locations where candidates can bring signs to be recycled after the Nov. 4 election. Good idea!
The Boston Globe's Sunday magazine had a big feature story about plastics yesterday, and it's noteworthy that the story was quite positive. It feels a little weird blogging on this one, since I'm a source quoted in the story. But a half dozen people who saw the story yesterday have already mentioned it to me today. So I thought I should point it out to those who missed it.
The story has a headline that will attract attention, especially from plastics industry members used to negative media attention. The title: "In Praise of Plastic: Why an oil-sucking, landfill-clogging, non-biodegradable, it's-everywhere material is so good for the environment. Really."
Here's a taste of the story:
Plastic -- symbol of a bankrupt consumer society from its maxed-out credit cards to its obsession with in-bulk acquisition -- is about as popular these days as an oil spill. People love to hate plastic for the petroleum used to produce it, for the litter it becomes, for the space it takes up in landfills, and the damage it can do in oceans. At one point this year in the United States alone, the plastics industry faced some 400 pieces of anti-plastics legislation, including one on Beacon Hill and another in Plymouth. Plastic bags -- for the plastic-haters, anyway -- are especially evil. The goal of most of the proposed laws is taxing the use of plastic bags or banning them outright. And though most have failed or wound up tabled, the anti-plastics people have had their victories, too. Namely, Seattle.
In July, the city of Seattle banned polystyrene takeout food packaging (think Styrofoam coffee cups or soup bowls) and placed a 20-cent tax on plastic bags that is set to go into effect January 1. The City Council's vote, supported by the mayor, shook a plastics industry that was still reeling from a panic in the spring. Parents concerned over the use of a possibly harmful chemical called bisphenol A, found in some clear plastic baby bottles among other things, ditched the bottles in droves, and some stores and manufacturers did the same. Then there was the phthalate ban, enacted by Congress over the summer, singling out yet another worrisome chemical often found in plastic toys.
Overall, it has been a bad year for plastics. But, quietly, the plastics industry, plastics engineers, and plastics lovers -- yes, they do exist -- are making a case for what may be a misunderstood touchstone of our times. "We see the legislative debates as an opportunity to tell the story of plastics," says Steve Russell, managing director of the plastics division at the American Chemistry Council, the group that represents the plastics industry. "And we believe there's a great story to tell." Plastics, Russell and others argue, aren't just durable, convenient, and inexpensive to manufacture; innovative new plastic packaging is actually more energy-efficient than other alternatives and helps users reduce, not increase, their carbon footprints.
The story goes on to tout the benefits of plastics in packaging, automobiles, aircraft and construction.
The underlying message is that plastics have plenty of positive attributes and don't deserve the bad reputation they have accumulated over the years.
But the industry's poor recycling record is front-and-center. "... Plastics are recyclable, able in most cases to be used over and over again," the story states. "The problem is, Americans, even as global warming becomes an accepted truth, don't take recycling seriously. In 2006, Americans consumed more than 29 million tons of plastic, but recycled just 2 million tons of it, a paltry 7 percent."
I have a feeling some in the plastics industry will miss that point and focus instead on the rare praise found elsewhere in the article.
Regardless, I'm pleased to see that reporter Keith O'Brien did such a thorough, well written story about plastics. I will be recommending the article to others who are looking for background information about the industry.
Plastics get a couple of mentions in Wal-Mart Canada's new corporate sustainability report, which was released today. The references come in the report's "environment" section. Here are the relevant snippets:
Wal-Mart Canada is aggressively pursuing its long-term sustainability goals: to be supplied by 100 per cent renewable energy; to produce zero waste; and to sell merchandise that sustains resources and the environment.
The company made several notable strides in 2007 including the expansion of its waste diversion program to include additional types of plastics. As a result of Wal-Mart Canada's multi-stream recycling program, the company was able to divert more than 100,000,000 kilograms of waste from landfill.
Given that 92 per cent of the company's waste is the result of product packaging, Wal-Mart Canada established new criteria to assess suppliers and supply chain partners on the basis of their environmental efforts, impact and improvement. In addition, suppliers were invited to participate in two sustainable packaging expos, in conjunction with the Packaging Association of Canada, where they were educated on new sustainable packaging materials, technologies, designs and alternatives. Wal-Mart Canada is on the verge of rolling out its new packaging scorecard, a roadmap designed to help suppliers reduce their individual packaging.
I wanted more information about the "additional types of plastics" that are being recycled, as mentioned in the news release. So I checked out the relevant section of the full report. Here's what it has to say:
Over the years, our in-store recycling efforts have grown in scope and complexity. Initially our stores recycled just cardboard. In 2006 we added plastic film to the mix. In 2007 we evolved to include virtually every type of plastic waste generated in our stores, from hangers to pill bottles. The materials are compacted together to create “sandwich bales” (a layer of plastic between two layers of cardboard), eventually sold at a profit for Wal-Mart for re-use by others.
Finally, here's what the report has to say about plastics (and other materials) in connection to the company's packaging scorecard:
Packaging reduction offers huge environmental and business benefits. Globally we’re targeting a five per cent reduction in packaging for merchandise sold in our stores by 2013. We will need to work closely with our suppliers to reach this goal.
n 2007 Wal-Mart Canada held two sustainable packaging expositions, in partnership with the Packaging Association of Canada and 120 exhibitors, to help educate many of our suppliers
and other businesses on new sustainable packaging materials, technologies, designs and alternatives. On the strength of the first exposition, the second exposition was the largest attended one-day packaging event in Canada’s history.
In 2008 Wal-Mart Canada will introduce a packaging scorecard to measure suppliers and their products on these criteria: package reduction and elimination; use of materials that are biodegradable or have residual value; commitments to reduce emissions or use renewable energy in the creation of packaging and support for programs that encourage recycling.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. obviously can move a lot of mountains in the packaging and recycling sectors. And with a goal of eventually cutting waste to zero, the company still has some heavy lifting to do. A lot of plastics packaging companies around the world are watching every Wal-Mart move very carefully.
Dow Chemical Co. Chairman and CEO Andrew Liveris spoke at the Detroit Economic Club today, emphasizing the need for a "comprehensive U.S. industrial policy."
Liveris outlined the need to balance energy, the environment and manufacturing as a foundation to keep the nation competitive in a world that is increasingly global, sophisticated and interdependent.
"What I'm talking about is a pro-industrial policy crafted and developed by manufacturers for manufacturers; a policy that rejuvenates our economic base. Consider it a new strategy, if you will, to make American industry competitive again, re-establish our economic and energy independence, and regrow jobs in America. What are the components of this plan? There are two. First, we must look with fresh eyes at the structural costs that have weakened the very foundation of our manufacturing enterprises and remove the obstacles hurting our competitiveness. And second, no surprise to any of you, we must develop a comprehensive energy policy."
Liveris signed on as a co-chair a National Summit on technology, energy, the environment and manufacturing. The other co-chair for the event, which is scheduled for June 15-17, 2009, in Detroit, will be William Clay Ford.
Hmmm, let's see. Those dates will put the summit just a week before NPE, and about five months into the first term of either President McCain or Obama. Anyone want to predict where the Dow Jones Industrials (and the price of a barrel of oil) will be when Ford and Liveris convene their summit?
Plastics recycling continues to get a lot of attention in the mainstream media. Cleveland's The Plain Dealer is the latest to weigh in, with a feature today that looks at effort and payback of recycling. The story attempts to answer the common question, is the effort of recycling worth the trouble?
Here's what reporter John Campanelli has to say about plastics recycling:
What it is: Water bottles, milk jugs, yogurt containers, etc.
Market price per ton: $500 for water and soda bottles (code No. 1 plastic), $800 for milk cartons and other HDPE plastics (code No. 2).
Benefits: Recycling a ton of plastic bottles saves almost four barrels of oil and 200 cubic feet of landfill space.
Downsides: Before recycling, plastics need to be sorted into their different polymer groups (those tiny numbers inside triangles you see on the products). Plastic water and soda bottles are also rarely recycled into more bottles. Instead, they end up in other products, like carpeting or synthetic fabrics.
How we are doing: Americans recycle about 24 percent of their plastic bottles. Recycling rates for other kinds of plastics are lower.
Campanelli gives plastics recycling the equivalent of three-and-a-half stars (he actually uses little recycling bins instead). That's behind steel, paper and aluminum, but ahead of glass. His sources for plastics information include the American Chemistry Council and, for pricing data, the Cuyahoga County Solid Waste District.
Plastics' light weight is a disadvantage when it comes to recycling. But the volume and homogeneity of products like milk jugs and soda bottles make recycling a natural. I've been getting a couple of calls per week from newspaper reporters doing stories on plastics recycling, so don't be surprised to see more coverage coming soon to a paper near you.
For its efforts today, I'll give The Plain Dealer four little recycling bins.
General Motors Corp.’s production version of the Chevrolet Volt has been getting plenty of press since the first photos began leaking out a week ago. Now with its official unveiling at GM’s 100th birthday party on Sept. 16, the media has finally started getting a close look at it.
There are some big differences between the concept Volt that rolled out at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit in January 2007 -- especially in the body structure. While GM engineers aren’t saying much about it, they did say that the body panels will be made of metal, unlike the concept which had a lightweight thermoplastic skin.
But plastic is still making a statement in the plug-in electric car, with splashes of white plastic in the interior. GM’s Global Design Director Ed Welburn told the Los Angeles Times that the carmaker wanted to mimic the design cues of today’s industrial design icons, including Apple Inc.’s iPod.
You can check out the inside view yourself through a GM video of the interior here.
Finally, special thanks to Rhoda Miel, our staff reporter in Detroit, for contributing this item to the blog today.
Bisphenol A is back in the headlines today, with a new report in the Journal of the American Medical Association that suggests an association between high exposure to BPA with the development of heart disease and diabetes.
The story is getting a lot of media attention. Check out this Washington Post story, as well as this sidebar telling readers how to avoid exposure to BPA.
The first tip in that sidebar -- telling consumers to avoid microwaving food in polycarbonate containers -- is potentially huge. A lot of informed consumers already know about the allegations of risk related to BPA in baby bottles, and in water bottles. But telling consumers to avoid microwaveable plastic containers is a new wrinkle.
The Post story about the new study includes an important caveat -- "The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their work and stressed that follow-up studies are needed to confirm their work and to determine whether BPA caused the observed health problems."
But I guarantee that many other media reports will leave out that detail.
The timing of the release, coming out the same day as the Food and Drug Administration holds a public hearing to debate BPA safety, will ensure that this story will get a lot of attention in your local newspaper and TV station today and tomorrow. Watch for more pressure to ban BPA in food packaging.
Merger and acquisition rumor stories are coming fast and furious lately, with a couple popping up this morning. The big news is from Reuters, which is reporting that Pfizer Inc. is interested in buying Bayer AG.
Also, in an unrelated move, some media including our sister newspaper Plastics & Rubber Weeklyare reporting that acylic resin and sheet supplier Lucite International Ltd. may be the object of a takeover.
Pfizer would be interested in Bayer primarily for the drug side of the business, so if this deal comes to fruition -- certainly that's a very big if, at this point -- expect to see the plastics unit find a home elsewhere.
Lucite, created from the 1993 merger of the acrylics businesses of DuPont Co. and ICI plc, holds about a 25 percent share of the global acrylics market, according to the PRW report. Potential bidders here could include Mitsubishi Rayon Co. Ltd., and Saudi International Petrochemical Co., known as Sipchem.
Plastic Logic Ltd. is getting an unbelievable amount of publicity today for a new product, the Plastic Logic Reader, which could someday replace paper for newspapers and magazines. The company calls the product "a gamechanging new device that brings a panoply of business information to your fingertips with powerful tools to make people more productive and simplify their work lives."
The Reader is the the size of a 8.5 x 11-inch paper, thinner than a pad of paper and lighter than many business periodicals, according to the company's news release. It's made of plastic, of course, using "high resolution transistor arrays on flexible plastic substrates, manufactured at a low temperature."
Plastic Logic also notes that its new manufacturing plant in Dresden, Germany, is scheduled to open next week.
One of our sister publications in Europe, Plastics & Rubber Weekly, previewed this announcement back on Aug. 22, while also noting that the company had raised an additional $50 million on top of the $150 million already raised by a consortium of investors backing the company.
There does seem to be a lot of interest in this technology. I think that's partly because news is whatever editors think is interesting, and most editors are going to be very interested in what the newspaper and magazine of the future might look like.
The story seems pretty speculative -- it's based on the news that Clariant CEO Jan Secher had resigned, coupled with conjecture that company Chairman Juerg Witmer may be inclined to seek a merger with Ciba.
Still, if it's true, this would be a deal of special interest to a lot of folks in the plastics industry, especially in the compounding sector. Bloomberg notes that both companies "have struggled since 2000 with reorganizations, unsuccessful purchases and increased Asian competition."
This isn't the first time that Ciba and Clariant have been named in takeover rumor stories, Remember a year ago, when a Swiss newspaper reported that Huntsman Corp. considered both companies attractive takeover candidates? That one sure did not pan out!
Why do some politicians like to ban stuff, like polystyrene takeout containers and polyethylene grocery bags? Peter Shawn Taylor, editor-at-large of Maclean's magazine, answers the question with this opinion column titled "Bomb the ban," in Canada's National Post.
Basically, Taylor says, there are four reasons for banning stuff:
1. Bans mean you care. ["Popular belief holds that saving the environment requires direct and immediate action. Further study is for wimps."]
2. Bans are easy. ["For politicians hoping to find simple solutions to difficult problems, a ban is the perfect option. ... Thinking intelligently about the law can be a complicated and time-consuming process. Not so with bans."]
3. Bans can make you famous. So true!
As politicians discover that bans give them a useful environmental profile, there's a strong incentive to be first. Case in point, Turner Valley's curious plan to ban Styrofoam. Such a move makes even less scientific sense than bans on pesticides or baby bottles. The embodied energy costs of Styrofoam are far less than paper alternatives, and it is entirely inert. This move will most likely do more harm than good for the environment. Besides, Styrofoam is simply the brand name for one form of polystyrene foam, which wasn't banned. But so what? Just announcing they were thinking of a ban got Turner Valley great press. It's the same reason even smaller Leaf Rapids, Man., banned plastic shopping bags last year. A ban is a great way for small-time politicians to get themselves national attention.
4. Bans provide cover for other ideologies.
If there is a ban to watch, it's the prohibition on bottled water sales. The Waterloo Region School Board got there first, as per reason three. Now university campus activists across the country are gearing up for major campaigns that will see bottled water banned in student buildings and offices. But this is not a crusade based on health issues. It clearly makes no sense to deny students access to a convenient and popular source of water at school, particularly given the state of most public water fountains. Rather, this urge is motivated by local politicians and campus groups who believe it is improper to make a profit selling water. The ban is meant to enforce the leftist belief that water should be free by outlawing its capitalist version.
Thought-provoking stuff... thanks to frequent blog reader Jim Cairns for pointing it out.
Here's government in action... today the National Toxicology Program released a statement and a report that suggests that parents might want to reduce infants' exposure to products containing bisphenol A, such as polycarbonate baby bottles.
Remember, this comes just a few months after the Food and Drug Administration took the opposite approach, with testimony to Congress that BPA is safe.
When FDA came out with its statement, I was surprised by the amount of press converage it generated. After all, FDA wasn't really saying anything new -- the agency has said all along that BPA is safe.
Now the National Toxicology Program is publicly contradicting FDA. Here's NTP's advice to parents:
More research is clearly needed to understand exactly how these findings relate to human health and development, but at this point we can't dismiss the possibility that the effects we're seeing in animals may occur in humans. If parents are concerned, they can make the personal choice to reduce exposures of their infants and children to BPA.
With the release of this report, you can expect to see BPA in the mainstream media again, like this story posted today from USA Today.
And expect to see a lot of very confused consumers.
There's been a lot of attention on plastics recycling lately, thanks in part to the high cost of virgin resin. It reminds me a little bit of the early 1990s, when recycling was part of my beat. At the time, it seemed like I was getting phone calls every week from people interested in starting plastics recycling companies. Who will buy our material, they asked. How much will they pay?
A handful of those pioneering companies are still around today. Many more didn't last more than a few years.
Like now, prices for virgin resin were inflated back then, in part because of Gulf War. (The explosion at the Phillips 66 Co. plant in Pasadena, Texas, also contributed to the rise in virgin HDPE prices).
A couple of recycling-related items caught my attention today. First, this plastics recycling backgrounder came from Consumer Reports magazine's Greener Choices electronic newsletter. It's a decent source of information that doesn't slip into the common mistake of describing some plastics as unrecyclable, or worse. Nice job.
Second, I noticed this story from the Indiana Gazette newspaper's Web site in Indiana, Pa., which notes that the local recycling program is actually generating a profit this year thanks to rising prices for recyclables, especially newsprint and cardboard. (Unfortunately the borough doesn't collect plastic yet, but it may start soon).
Plastics recycling is a cyclical business, and if virgin resin prices start to drop, some recyclers will consider that pretty bad news.
The Discovery Channel's Web site has an interesting story today on how the city of Vandergrift, Pa., plans to use plastic strips to generate electricity thanks to the strong currents of the Kiskiminetas River.
Lisa Weiland, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh's Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, explains that Vandergrift is a steel town that is "reinventing itself and going for sustainability." The town hopes to generate between 20-40 percent of the city center's electricity using the technology.
Here's how the plastic strips will work:
That sustainable power will most likely come from a grid of undulating strips made of polyvinylidene fluoride or PVDF, a material that generates a slight electrical current when it is moved, in this case, by the currents and eddies in the Kiskiminetas River. Such materials are described as piezoelectric and the resulting electrical current would pass to small substations along the river's edge before charging a group of batteries. ...
The exact details about how dense the grid would be, how long the PVDF strips will be, or even when the grid would be laid down, are still being worked out. But whatever the final plans are, the researchers claim they will maintain the health and appearance of the Kiski, which is used for fishing, canoe trips and other recreational activities.
Sounds like an interesting technology that, no doubt, could easily be duplicated elsewhere. It will be interesting to see if the project is really cost effective, which would make it truly sustainable.
Here's a post that's sure to make some Plastics Blog readers angry. It's a Web-based cartoon called Gorilla in the Greenhouse, and its first episode is devoted to plastic bag litter.
I don't think most readers will have a problem with the idea of communicating to kids that they shouldn't litter, or that they should recycle or reuse things like plastic bags. Those messages are in the cartoon. The part I think some will find objectionable is how the cartoonist portrays the plastic bag company. The factory is run by some smarmy characters named Wormulus and Dr. Hufflebot, a "destructive duo" bent on world domination. In this episode, titled the "Great Pacific Garbage Patch" (which not a new concept to this blog's readers), Wormulus and Hufflebot are creating billions of plastic bags in order to create a floating empire called Baglandia.
Remember, this is aimed at little kids. The tone is that plastics are bad, and factories are run by evil people. The Web site urges kids to push for legislative bag bans -- they're told that's the only real solution to the problem.
Thanks to the Los Angeles Times' Daily Deal Travel blog, of all places, for alerting me to this cartoon.
Polyester film extruders -- prepare to save the planet. An Australian PhD student has won top prize in a global competition for a proposal to save the earth from a possible collision with an asteroid dubbed Apophis by wrapping the intruder with plastic film.
The theory is that if we could wrap enough reflective film on the surface of the asteroid, the film would act as a solar sail. "Such a coating may increase the asteroid’s reflectivity, enabling deflection by solar radiation pressure."
The prize winner is Mary D'Souza, a student at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Queensland in Australia (two blog posts in a row from U of Q? Just a coincidence). Her paper is titled "A Body Solar Sail Concept for the Deflection of 99942 Apophis.”
The project is getting some mediaattention today, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it featured in your local newspaper or TV report sometime soon.
But isn't this all a bit far-fetched? Maybe so. (How would we get enough film into space? How could we wrap the asteroid?)
Sustainability is the latest buzzword in the plastics industry, and now some universities seem to believe it's an issue that will be with us for a long time. The latest to jump on board -- specifically related to plastics -- are the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, and Queen's University Belfast in Northern Ireland.
The universities announced the news today. Their agreement -- they call it a "partnership to promote plastics sustainability" -- "will accelerate research into new-generation plastics that are biodegradable, and environmentally friendly manufacturing techniques," according to the release. Peter Halley, director of the Centre for High Performance Polymers in the Australian university's School of Engineering, said polymer research was vital in developing a sustainable future for the plastics industry.
“The partnership connects leading researchers and research laboratories in nanocomposites, biopolymers and polymer processing, and allows us to share equipment and expertise,” Halley said.
In the United States, the University of Massachusetts Lowell has a sustainability effort with a notable plastics angle. (It's interesting that UMass Lowell also has a "Precautionary Principle Project," a topic that also of interest to the plastics industry.)
To learn more about sustainability, check out the Sustain '08 conference in November organized by Plastics News Global Group and the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.
The Boisset Family Estates winery is making a big deal out of its decision to package all of its Beaujolais Nouveau being imported into the United States in PET bottles. Never mind the glass bottle shortage in France -- this is all about sustainability.
"It is critical in today’s time, with the scarcity of our planet’s resources and the known environmental impacts of human activity, that we consider whether we should still ship thousands of cases of wine in heavy bottles via air throughout the world in order for the wines to arrive on time for their annual release date in November, when we can reduce fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions by more than half through a responsible choice of packaging," said President Jean-Charles Boisset, in a news release.
"Were all of this year’s Beaujolais Nouveau imported to North America similarly packaged in PET or other alternative packages, we estimate saving literally millions of pounds of greenhouse gas emissions from entering our atmosphere," he added -- and estimated 37,000,000 pounds of carbon dioxide.
Consumers will share in the benefits. The company expects its freight costs will be 33 percent lower, and "This savings will be directly passed on to the consumer," Boisset said. Instead of $13.99 to $14.99 per bottle, the wines will retail for $12.99.
I have a feeling U.S. consumers are ready for Beaujolais in PET -- after all, they've already accepted "Two Buck Chuck."
Here's some bad news -- within 10 years, the price of plastic resin will be so high that it may be economically worthwhile to dig up landfills and collect the stuff that we're throwing away today.
That's the story from Plastics & Rubber Weekly, our sister publication in Europe. Online editor Katie Coyne has a story today quoting Peter Mills, a waste specialist from New Earth Solutions Ltd., who says plastic prices are fast reaching a point where mining landfills will be a viable option.
Mills says plastics in well maintained landfills should be perfectly preserved. He adds that another source of material could be all the plastic marine debris that's causing so many problems today.
So I guess there's some good news here too -- higher resin prices will mean less litter, and people (and companies) will be willing to recycle more.
Since many experts in resin pricing think prices are going to go down next year, I wonder how many years away we really are from starting to dig in landfills for old plastic trash.
"We're getting a bit tired of this distraction campaign, frankly," said John Mullinder, executive director of the Etobicoke, Ontario-based PPEC. He says the plastics industry leadership "resorts to taking cheap shots at paper, using emotive and non-scientific terms such as 'environmentally friendly' (a meaningless term, according to the Canadian Standards Association and the Canadian Competitions Bureau) and 'tree-hungry' paper bags."
The plastics industry is also fond of trotting out so-called scientific or "life cycle" studies, PPEC says, many of them commissioned by themselves, and others that have little relevance to Canada and Canadian circumstances. "There is no, repeat no, peer-reviewed life cycle analysis of paper and plastic grocery bags used in Canada that meets ISO standards. In fact, we would welcome a credible analysis that recognizes the environmental impact of manufacturing polymers from oil and natural gas and shipping plastic resin and/or bags all the way from coal-dependent China. That would be interesting."
It's interesting to see the competitive arguments between plastics and paper. To add some perspective to the story, let me add that the paper industry rarely sees the sort of negative perception that the plastics industry is constantly battling. As an example, here's a feature titled "The dangers of plastic bags" on the Stroudsburg, Pa.-based Pocono Record newspaper's Web site. I see this type of thing every day. When's the last time you saw a "dangers of paper bags" feature in the mainstream media?
The San Diego Union-Tribune's Web site has a story today about the city of Solana Beach, Calif., linking up with Trex Co. Inc. to recycle plastic bags.
This is an unusual step, for a community to make a deal directly with a manufacturer like Trex. Kyle Pogue, a supervisor at the California Integrated Waste Management Board, told the newspaper that Solana Beach could serve as a model for other cities.
The idea came from Debbie Sandler, described as a stay-at-home mom involved in school recycling efforts.
The story also notes that Solana Beach has a reputation for embracing environmental initiatives.
Trex is a major recycler, using waste film and other materials to make decking. A Washington Poststory recently noted that the company boosted its profit last quarter thanks to "improving productivity and buying lower-quality recycled plastics."
We saw a story that referenced PVC pipe in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune back on Aug. 1 that didn't make any sense. The story was basically a list of laws that were taking effect in Minnesota that day, with a brief description of each one. Here's the blurb that got our attention:
GLOBAL WARMING: Producers and buyers of industrial and commercial gases with a high "global warming potential" must now report data on their sales and use to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Outdoor lighting fixtures installed or replaced with state funds must use specific cutoff luminaires that conserve energy and minimize light pollution.
Additionally, homeowners can get up to $250 from the state when replacing PVC piping in home heating oil systems with metal piping.
I showed the story to Matt Griswold, our staff reporter who covers building and construction, and it had both of us puzzled. What does replacing PVC pipe in home heating oil systems have to do with global warming? Why would the state pay anyone to replace PVC with metal? (If you think we were confused, check out the comment section of the story on the Star-Tribune's Web site. It's obvious that none of the readers have any idea what this law is about).
Matt did some checking, and here's what he found:
The state of Minnesota will pay homeowners up to $250 for replacing PVC pipe being used in residents' home heating oil systems with iron pipe. But it is a simple engineering problem, not an environmental one, according to Steve Lee, manager of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Emergency Response unit.
In an Aug. 5 telephone interview, Lee explained that in rural parts of the state, many homes are heated with fuel oil. Often, the oil systems are built in a home's basement. When homeowners remodel their basements, some of the do-it-yourself types are relocating the heating oil systems, and using PVC pipe to connect their tanks to the fueling ports outside their homes.
In addition to being non-code-compliant, fuel oil has a tendency to attack PVC joints, and can cause the system to fail after a few fill ups, Lee said. The end result can be a homeowner's basement flooded with fuel oil.
Where does the money come from? Minnesota has a Petro Fund, Lee said. Anyone who sells petroleum is taxed a penny or two per dollar earned, and that is deposited into the fund. That fund will finance the $250 pipe replacement projects, he said. Also, the state can help homeowners arrange for someone in the pipe trade to come in and put in the proper metal piping that meets the code, he said.
So that's the real story: PVC pipe doesn't contribute to global warming, and Minnesota isn't really interested in paying its residents a bounty to get rid of plastic pipe. They just want to protect homeowners from flooding their basements with fuel oil.
I don't know about you, but I can sleep better at night knowing the truth. Thanks to Steve Lee and Matt Griswold for solving the mystery.
Michigan State University is touting a start-up company that is commercialing a material developed by researchers from the school's Composite Materials and Structure Center. The material, -- xGnP Exfoliated Graphite NanoPlatelets -- can make "plastic stiffer, lighter and stronger and could result in more fuel-efficient airplanes and cars as well as more durable medical and sports equipment."
The company is XG Sciences Inc., with offices in East Lansing and a manufacturing plant in Lansing, Mich. The research was led by Lawrence Drzal, a professor of chemical engineering and materials science and director of the composites center.
The company claims its technology can make better nanocomposites:
Our nano-particles consist of small stacks of graphene layers that can replace carbon nanotubes, nano-clays, or other carbon compounds in many composite applications. When added in trace amounts to plastics or resins, our nanoparticles make these materials electrically or thermally conductive, and less permeable, while simultaneously improving mechanical properties like strength, stiffness, or surface toughness.
For example, when our graphene nanoparticles are added to nylon, the resulting nanocomposite is significantly less permeable to gasoline or other fuels while also dissipating static electricity. This composite is an ideal material for lining fuel tanks.
Other applications listed on the company's Web site inlcude electronic enclosures, automotive parts that can be electrostatically, aerospace composites, appliances, batteries and fuel cells.
Automotive applications for nanopolymers are especially interesting. These materials are proving that they can help plastics compete with metals in new applications, saving weight and therefore boosting fuel economy.
The Christian Science Monitor has a story about a cool new application for plastics -- in thin, bendable screens that can be used in a wide variety of electronics goods.
The technology will make possible the kind of technology we saw in Steven Spielberg's film "Minority Report," where "Newspapers updated in readers' hands and advertisements talked to passersby. Even cereal boxes were animated."
Plastics are making the technology possible, because they are cheaper than silicon. The market is growing fast -- the plastics electronics industry will grow from $30 billion in 2015 to $250 billion in 2025, according to an electronics consulting company quoted in the story. The market for organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays and lighting could reach $15.5 billion by 2014.
Flexible displays -- LG Display and Sony have prototypes -- will likely be on store shelves in the next five years, although they probably won’t be widely affordable for a few more years after that, says [Janice Mahon, vice president of technology commercialization for Universal Display Corp. in Ewing, N.J.].
For a peek at where the technology is today, check out the October issue of Esquire magazine, which will have a special e-paper cover that blinks to commemorate its 75th anniversary.
In another move from the city that loves plastics every three years -- for NPE -- Chicago is banning farmers' markets from using plastic shopping bags starting next year.
The story comes from our sister paper, Crain's Chicago Business, which reports that vendors at the city's 24 farmers' markets will be told later this week that they can't use plastic bags next year.
“This is part of the city’s message to go greener,” a spokeswoman for the Mayor's Office of Special Events told the paper. "We want to set a precedent that this is something we believe in."
The story notes that one farmer is questioning the new policy. Henry Brockman of Henry's Farm "questioned on his farm's Web site whether biodegradable bags are as environmentally friendly as marketed."
First a tax on PET water bottles, now a limited ban on plastic shopping bags. Does anyone else expect Mayor Richard M. Dailey may not get the warm welcome he's used to receiving at McCormick Place next summer?
Time magazine's Web site has a feature story today on Stephen L. Joseph, head of the Save the Plastic Bag campaign. The story's headline calls Joseph "The Patron Saint of Plastic Bags."
In the pantheon of lost causes, defending the plastic grocery bag would seem to be right up there with supporting smoking on planes or the murder of puppies. The thin white ubiquitous bag has moved squarely beyond eyesore and into the realm of public nuisance, a symbol of waste and excess and the incremental destruction of nature. But where there's an industry at risk, there's an attorney, and the plastic bag's advocate-in-chief is Stephen L. Joseph, head of the quixotically titled Save the Plastic Bag campaign.
Ouch.
The former Washington lobbyist, who was born in England and reluctantly gives his age as 50-something, admits it's an uphill battle trying to improve the image of a throwaway item that has been tied to everything from global warming to dependence on oil and the death of marine life. Especially in California. Particularly in ultra-liberal Marin County. It took him more than a year after the bag manufacturers came calling to take on the cause. "It's very challenging to counter the myths and misinformation," he says from his Tiburon, Calif., law offices. "I'm a one man show."
One-man show is an exaggeration, of course. It's interesting to see that Time discovered Joseph -- perhaps his reputation as a publicist is well deserved. Anyway, there are others who have been crusading on behalf of plastic bags -- and at this point, it looks like they all can use some help.
The Consumerist blog has an interesting photo, and an active comment section, with a post today about the PLA bottle used by Primo Water Corp.
Titled "The incredible shrinking water bottle," the blog has a photo of two Primo bottles, one that apparently shrunk to half its regular size after being left in a car in the hot Houston sun. The post concludes: "Degradable bottles seem like a good idea, we just don't want them degrading inside of our cars."
I'm not too alarmed about half-empty PLA bottles shrinking in my car. But I'm still not convinced that water bottles are the best target market for PLA. It would be a much better idea to get people to recycle their PET bottles instead. A 10 cent deposit on water bottles would work wonders.
Fortune magazine's Marc Gunther has an interesting perspective on the bisphenol A controversy with this column, "Wal-Mart: the new FDA." There's a lot of background and perspective, so it's a great story to read if you're new to the issue, or if you need some help understanding what all the fuss is about and how the major players are involved. Gunther even remembered to include NBC medical reporter Dr. Nancy Snyderman. Wow! (Marc, are you reading the Plastics Blog?)
This is exactly how a general-interest business publication should cover an environmental issue.
Near the end of the article, Gunther sums it all up with an interesting question:
I asked Wal-Mart why the company is removing a legal product, which may or may not be dangerous, while continuing to sell cigarettes, which are incontrovertibly harmful. "We sell products our customers want to buy," responded spokeswoman Linda Brown Blakley. "Our customers are telling us they want this option."
That won't end the war. You can expect to see anti-BPA forces keep up the pressure. Will soup, soda and beer cans be next?
I'm not sure about that. BPA critics are definitely aware of the metal can/BPA connection, but to date they've gone after polycarbonate exclusively.
The Washington Post has an interesting story today that's bound to get some play elsewhere. It's an article by David Michaels, an author and epidemiologist who teaches environmental health policy at the George Washington University School of Public Health, on the link between research findings and who is doing the funding.
The headline sums it up: "It's Not the Answers That Are Biased, It's the Questions: If Two Similar Studies Completely Disagree, Look at How the Funders Framed the Issue."
Michaels leads into the topic by looking at the debate about bisphenol A safety:
One of the eyebrow-raising statistics about the BPA studies is the stark divergence in results, depending on who funded them. More than 90 percent of the 100-plus government-funded studies performed by independent scientists found health effects from low doses of BPA, while none of the fewer than two dozen chemical-industry-funded studies did.
This striking difference in studies isn't unique to BPA. When a scientist is hired by a firm with a financial interest in the outcome, the likelihood that the result of that study will be favorable to that firm is dramatically increased. This close correlation between the results desired by a study's funders and those reported by the researchers is known in the scientific literature as the "funding effect."
Having a financial stake in the outcome changes the way even the most respected scientists approach their research. Scientists make many decisions about the doses, exposure methods and disease definitions they use in their experiments, and each decision affects the result.
Michaels doesn't charge that industry-funded studies (or non-industry funded studies, for that matter) are junk. Instead, he explores why the results are so different, and he offers a solution:
It has become clear to medical editors that the problem is in the funding itself. As long as sponsors of a study have a stake in the conclusions, these conclusions are inevitably suspect, no matter how distinguished the scientist.
The answer is de-linking sponsorship and research. One model is the Health Effects Institute, a research group set up by the Environmental Protection Agency and manufacturers. HEI has an independent governing structure; its first director was Archibald Cox, who famously refused to participate in President Richard Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre" meant to help cover up the Watergate scandal. HEI conducts studies paid for by corporations, but its researchers are sufficiently insulated from the sponsors that their results are credible.
Interesting idea. Does it have a chance to succeed?
Debbie Hauser responded to a column in the Escondido, Calif. North County Times with a thorough letter to the editor that's worth sharing.
The subject of the Hauser's wrath was this June 23 article by freelance columnist Gail Chatfield, headlined "Solutions to plastic pollution." Chatfield was praising Elizabeth Willes and the Surfrider Foundation for their efforts to get Encinitas, Calif., to adopt a ban on single-use plastic bags.
Chatfield wrote:
According to the Surfrider Foundation, Californians use 600 plastic bags per second, 30 billion plastic bags per year! Even more horrifying, the foundation estimates that it takes 12 million barrels of oil annually to produce the 100 billion plastic bags used nationally.
Yes, we do have recycling bins for plastic bags, but nationwide only about one percent of plastic grocery bags get recycled. Unlike cans and bottles that can repeatedly be made into new cans and bottles, plastic grocery bags cannot be made into new bags. They are "downcycled" into other plastic consumer products, like plastic lumber, but that's only if the bags are recycled.
Paper bags are a good alternative since grocery stores distribute three plastic bags for each paper. However, paper bags are usually made from recycled content paper. California ships its post-consumer mixed paper to China where it is made into recycled content paper and shipped back to us.
Gail Chatfield's recent column in the North County Times was so biased under the guise of an informed and factual article, that I felt statements need to be addressed.
She said that grocery bags cannot be made into new bags, as are cans and bottles. Grocery bags should be compared with paper bags, not cans and bottles. Plastic bags are made from "up to 25 percent recycled plastic bags."
She stated that paper bags are a good alternative because they are usually (?) made from recycled content. Is she saying that it is a good use of transportation fuel so that bags are sent to China from California and back to the Golden State to become paper with recycled content?
She said grocery stores distribute three plastic bags per paper bag to their customers. The stores prefer plastic because paper is so bulky and expensive to transport as compared with plastic. Many customers prefer plastics, because after the groceries are home, there are so many uses for the plastic bags versus paper: food wrapping, ice bagging, lining of garbage pails, picking up dog poop, etc. The many secondary uses of plastic bags are also one of the reasons that plastic bags do not end up in recycling bins.
It's interesting (and rare) to see someone like Hauser respond to criticism of plastics in the media. Perhaps we'll see more of this when the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s promotion campaign takes off later this year. How many others are out there like Hauser, who are willing to spend the time and stick their neck out to stand up for plastics?
Time magazine's Web site posted a story yesterday that I'm really surprised to see from a magazine with such a solid reputation. Basically it combines a couple of different plastics-related issues -- BPA, phthalates and marine debris -- into a story that casts a shadow over all plastics. And even though it devotes nearly 1,000 words to the story, there's no hint of any industry response.
Here's a taste of the story, which has the headline "The Truth about Plastic":
The U.S. produced 28 million tons of plastic waste in 2005 -- 27 million tons of which ended up in landfills. Our food and water come wrapped in plastic. It's used in our phones and our computers, the cars we drive and the planes we ride in. But the infinitely adaptable substance has its dark side. Environmentalists fret about the petroleum needed to make it. Parents worry about the possibility of toxic chemicals making their way from household plastic into children's bloodstreams.
The article suggests that the public "avoid plastic bottles and toys labeled with the numbers 3 or 7, which often contain BPA or phthalates, and steer clear of vinyl shower curtains and canned foods -- especially those with acidic contents like tomatoes."
Plastics News readers aren't going to find anything new in Time's report, but it's interesting to see how it boils down some pretty complicated issues into a one-sided report that will probably unnecessarily scare some readers. I expect to see reporting like this on TV, but not from a news magazine.
OK, it's still too early to do too much blogging on the presidential election. If you're really interested in that sort of thing, there are plenty of places you can get it. But it's interesting that John McCain brought up plastic footware maker Crocs Inc. in a July 7 town hall meeting in Denver.
Here's a link to the video, in which McCain suggests that Barack Obama would favor a protectionist policy that would have stymied growth at Crocs.
"Five years ago, the outdoor footwear company, Crocs, was started by a couple of entrepreneurs with a great idea, ingenuity and drive," McCain says. "This former small business now employs 600 people in Colorado alone, and sells over 50 percent of its products in 90 countries around the world. Building barriers to Crocs or any American company's access to foreign markets will have a devastating effect on our economy and jobs, and the prosperity of American families."
I wonder if McCain knew that Crocs is in the process of shifting some work to Mexico (scoll down in the link for the story from our April 21 issue). Please, don't anyone tell Ross Perot!
Getting retailers to stop giving customers free plastic bags might be difficult. A few reports from the UK today seem to indicate that many clerks at major chain Marks & Spencer have been giving customers smaller free bags, or just not charging the 5 pence fee for regular-sized bags.
This report from the Telegraph accuses the chain of misleading the public about its campaign to cut plastic bag use. The paper sent staffers to 10 M&S stores and found that "staff often encouraged customers to avoid charges by offering them several smaller bags, which are still free. In some cases, the charges were just being waived."
A spokesman for M&S disputed the findings. He said the company has managed to cut its plastic bag use by 80 percent, and that it has seen no increase in the use of small bags not covered by the fee.
"We have clear evidence that this is working," he told the Telegraph.
Breaking retailers of the habit of automatically handing customers a plastic bag with every purchase might be difficult -- perhaps even more difficult than getting consumers to stop expecting free bags all the time.
The Houston Chronicle has two different takes on polystyrene foodservice products this week, and it's notable how they seem be be coming from such different points of view.
First, a science-related blog on the paper's Web site called SciGuy had an item on Sunday that asked "Better for the planet: Java in a mug or a Styrofoam cup?" It's notable, in this new era of PS product bans, that the report took a pretty balanced view. It noted that "it takes about 14 megajoules (or about 14 million times the energy required to lift an apple 1 meter) to manufacture a ceramic coffee mug. It takes 200,000 joules to make a polystyrene cup, about half the energy required to make a paper cup. So, even before other considerations, you'd have to use the ceramic mug 70 times to offset the energy of a single polystyrene cup."
Adding in the energy of washing the ceramic cup, and it turns out that the mug has to be used 1,006 times to equal PS cups.
"There are other factors, of course," notes SciGuy Eric Berger. "Polystyrene accumulates in landfills, and ceramic mugs much less so. But how many coffee mugs actually get used 1,006 times, or just about every day for three years?"
Yesterday the Chronicle took a different approach to PS, with a Page 1 story on the Houston Independent School District switching away from "environmentally unfriendly lunch trays" at the suggestion of a 10-year-old pupil. It notes that the district plans to spend an extra $160,000 next year in order to buy biodegradable trays, instead of the PS variety it buys now.
The story notes that: "The new trays take about nine months to decompose, compared with the hundreds of years it takes other polystyrene trays to break down, officials said."
In addition to the higher cost, the new trays also mean other changes. For one, kids need to learn to neatly stack used trays back in the boxes they came in, rather than throwing them out in plastic trash bags, so that when they are disposed, moisture and oxygen can get in and make them decompose.
The credit for the change goes to a rising sixth grader in the district.
Austin Fendley, who just finished fifth grade at Lovett Elementary, encouraged HISD to take the leap by publicly scolding them at a May school board meeting for using roughly 40 million foam trays a year.
Worried that the old trays were bad for the environment and for students' health, he started packing his own lunch and conducted a science experiment involving alternative products.
He said he's thrilled HISD is switching to a biodegradable trays. "I'm really surprised," he said from summer camp Tuesday. "I didn't know I would actually make a difference."
Perhaps Fendley, or someone like him, is the next generation's SciGuy. What will that mean for the future of the plastics industry?
The New York Times Magazine had a feature story yesterday on marine debris, focusing on how plastic is reaching remote coasts in Alaska.
It's sad to see so much plastic trash spoiling this wilderness. No one lives in Gore Point, Alaska -- yet, in two weeks, nine volunteers managed to collect 30 tons of debris there, most of it plastic. Who's responsible? What can we do to stop it? The Times asks lot of questions, and does a good job of putting it all into perspective.
For example, it introduces readers to Charles Moore, the oceanographer who deserves much of the credit for publicizing the "Garbage Patch," and then the story points out that his work is "somewhat controversial."
Even marine biologists who share his alarm have misgivings about the sensationalism with which the Garbage Patch is sometimes described. Since the plastic debris in the North Pacific convergence zone is spread out unevenly across millions of miles of ocean, and since most of it is fragmentary, flowing through the water column like dust through air, the Garbage Patch bears little resemblance to a floating junkyard. But it is, numerous scientists assured me, very much for real.
Beth Flint’s nuanced testimony was typical. Flint is a wildlife biologist with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. One seabird she studies is the Laysan albatross, which, thanks to a recent Greenpeace ad campaign, has become plastic pollution’s most famous victim — its poster bird, if you will. The ad shows a photograph in which a slimy casserole of bottle caps, cigarette lighters and unidentifiable plastic shards spills from the downy belly of a necropsied Laysan albatross chick. “How to starve to death on a full stomach,” the caption reads. The image is not merely powerful, or shocking; it’s persuasively accusatory. Look, dear consumer, it seems to say; look at what you’ve done, look where what you throw away ends up.
There’s only one problem, Flint says. No one knows for certain whether plastic killed the albatross. Do plastic shards perforate the intestines of chicks? Sometimes. Does plastic obstruct the digestive tract or make a bird “starve to death with a full stomach”? Probably, in some cases. Then again albatrosses eat squid, and chitonous squid beaks are also indigestible. Are the toxins in and on plastics poisoning the birds, as Moore has proposed? It wouldn’t be surprising. According to Flint, long-lived seabirds like albatrosses do indeed have alarmingly high contaminant burdens. But research into the pathology of plastic poisoning is ongoing, and in the meantime, “it’s still all sort of circumstantial.”
Despite these caveats, Flint has little doubt that plastic is “clearly not good” for seabirds, and her praise for Moore is unequivocal. “I think that he’s done a tremendously valuable service to humanity by pursuing this when none of the big oceanographic or academic institutions or government institutions did,” Flint said. She predicts that other researchers will soon “get on his bandwagon.”
Later in the story, author Donovan Hohn looks how to deal with marine debris. Is there a solution?
As nearly everyone I spoke to about marine debris agrees, the best way to get trash out of our waterways is, of course, to keep it from entering them in the first place. But experts disagree about what that will take. The argument, like so many in American politics, pits individual freedom against the common good. “Don’t you tell me I can’t have a plastic bag,” Seba Sheavly, the marine-debris researcher, says, alluding to plastic-bag bans like the one San Francisco enacted last year. “I know how to dispose of it responsibly.” But proponents of bag bans insist that there is no way to use a plastic bag responsibly. Lorena Rios, an environmental chemist at the University of the Pacific, says: “If you go to Subway, and they give you the plastic bag, how long do you use the plastic bag? One minute. And how long will the polymers in that bag last? Hundreds of years.”
“The time for voluntary measures has long since passed,” says Steve Fleischli, president of Waterkeeper Alliance, a network of environmental watchdogs ...
The statistics quoted in this story will be considered authoritative, and will be repeated. So you can expect the Times story will raise the heat on the marine debris issue.
National Public Radio has posted a story this afternoon about how the rising price of energy threatens the North American plastics industry.
Host Madeleine Brand interviewed Dow Chemical Co. CEO Andrew Liveris, who pointed out that he has been saying for years that the United States needed to do something or its chemical sector would face a crisis.
Then, host Alex Cohen talked to Tom Duffey, CEO of Germantown, Wis.-based injection molder Plastic Components Inc. (a Plastics News Processor of the Year finalist), who quoted some alarming statistics. He said that many molders have not been able to pass along resin price increases -- and the near-term future for those companies is dire:
"I've talked to a number of people in the industry who have a much broader perspective on the North American marketplace than I do, and it is their expectation that we can see an attrition rate of up to 30 percent of the molders in North America in the next 12 to 15 months. Which will involve hundreds and hundreds of companies, and thousands and thousands of employees in that industry," Duffey said.
"And a lot of these industries are heartland industries. These are Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan manufacturing companies that I think are going to be in severe distress over the next year as these economic forces work at us from two different sides of the equation. One is the decreasing demand for our products just because of the economic slowdown. And the other being the dramatic increase in the price of raw material, which is clearly the biggest cost driver in our industry."
Are vinyl shower curtains "harmless" or "potentially toxic"? If it's a slow news day, expect to see coverage of this question in your local newspaper tomorrow, thanks to the release of a report, "Volatile Vinyl: The New Shower Curtain's Chemical Smell."
A news release from CHEJ and CELA claims vinyl shower curtains off-gas toxic chemicals, and it calls on the U.S. and Canada "to take serious action on the use of PVC in consumer products." (The full report is available here.)
The Vinyl Institute was prepared for this report today, and sent out a news release of its own. Here are some excerpts:
Decades of research and use prove that shower curtains made of vinyl are safe, effective and deserve their popularity, the Vinyl Institute said this morning.
The Institute responded to a report released today that attempts to manipulate retailer and public fears over this simple, popular and trusted household item.
The report lists substances in vinyl shower curtains. To a doctor or scientist, the report shows that vinyl shower curtains are not much different from other familiar consumer goods. Even foods can contain some of the chemicals listed in the report.
To a consumer or retailer, however, the report is carefully written to provoke anxiety over whether shower curtains are harmful – without citing any evidence of actual harm.
Greg Bocchi, president of the Vinyl Institute, said, “Shower curtains are not harmful. This report is simple scare-mongering. It is a blatant attempt by a well-known pressure group to manipulate consumers and retailers into thinking that shower curtains pose a danger, when they don’t. It offers no evidence of actual harm.”
It will be interesting to see if -- and how -- the media reports this story. The first news Web site that I've seen pick it up today is the New York Daily News, which covered it with the pithy headline "Shower curtains could mean curtains for you, says watchdog group."
That story doesn't quote VI or its response, but it does include comments from a Consumer Product Safety Commission spokewoman who says "The claims being made about the dangers of shower curtains are phantasmagorical. It's ridiculous"
Plus there's this reaction at the end of the Daily News story:
"If you don't eat the shower curtain, it probably doesn't pose a real risk, but if there's no ventilation you'll be exposed," said Dr. Joel Forman, an associate professor of community and preventive medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
"If you have one that's more than a month old, the levels are likely quite low," Forman said. "My year-old one, I'm more worried about the mold."
Careful what chemicals you use to clean that curtain, Dr. Forman. They could be toxic.
I've seen an awful lot of headlines today about some comments that FDA made yesterday about the safety of bisphenol A.
In journalism, there's a name for a story about something that isn't really new. We call it a non-story. This BPA story is a non-story.
The big headlines shout that Dr. Norris Alderson, FDA's associate commissioner for science, testified before a U.S. House subcommittee that BPA is safe.
"Although our review is ongoing, there's no reason to recommend consumers stop using products with BPA," Alderson said.
Sound interesting? Not really. This is exactly what FDA has been saying for months, including just after the wave of publicity that saw stores remove polycarbonate baby bottles and water jugs from their shelves.
Since the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee is considering a bill that would outlaw polycarbonate baby bottles, we'll all get a chance to hear opponents and proponents re-state how they feel about BPA safety. So expect more headlines in the coming days as experts testify, and representatives question them and make their own mini-speeches.
Is it newsworthy? Not really. It's certainly not an important new revelation. A colleague said this is an example of daily newspapers and wire services being dumb and lazy, looking for easy stories. Sometimes, I'm sure, they feel the need to write about everything that moves in Washington -- even when the motion is just hot air.
Public relations firms are usually stuck behind the scenes -- often playing an important part in major company news, but rarely getting any credit for their role. So I'll take an opportunity today to highlight a firm that our Plastics News reporters deal with all the time, AH&M Marketing Communications Inc.
The Pittsfield, Mass.-based Berkshire Eagle has this feature story today on AH&M, described as a "global media relations firm" celebrating its 20th anniversary this year. The subject of the interview is the firm's boss, Jim Allison, a former GE Plastics spokesman.
Most of the North Street agency's clients are Fortune 500 companies that operate on the cusp of invention and technology — in plastics, chemicals, electronics, construction and health care. But such advancements often are most tantalizing within industry circles and in trade publications that track the latest buzz in carbon fiber, thermoplastics, flexible plastics and chemical advances, which eventually wind up in scores of consumer products, medical equipment, cars and electronics.
I thought it was interesting that although our reporters talk to Jim and his crew frequently, and we see them at trade shows around the world, neither he nor AH&M show up in a search of our story archives.
Talk about being behind-the-scenes. Today, here's a rare chance for Jim to enjoy the spotlight.
Behind Kreinberg and Reinhard's pitch for Dow Chemical
The financial media this week is covering the settlement of the lawsuits between Dow Chemical Co. and two former executives, Romeo Kreinberg and J. Pedro Reinhard. One of the more interesting stories I've seen the past few days is in today's The New York Times business section, titled "Secret Life of a Deal."
The story looks at court documents and pieces together the timeline and players of "Project Achilles," the name the pair gave to their secret plan to try to take over Midland, Mich.-based Dow.
The story notes that "the case and its juicy depositions weren't just about two rogue employees. It pulled the curtain back on a netherworld of deal makers on various continents who had become wrapped up in this plot."
Some juicy tidbits from the story:
If they had been successful, the pair would have ousted Dow CEO Andrew Liveris and made Kreinberg CEO and Reinhard chairman.
The would-be takeover team tried to get Len Blavatnik, owner of Basell Polyolefins, to participate in the deal.
Reinhard sought $5 million from the Sultanate of Oman to resign from Dow and work on the buyout.
JPMorgan executives met with Kreinberg and Reinhard in secret at a hotel outside London, the Compleat Angler. The group had "hired entire hotel for confidentiality." Looks like a nice place. Let's hope they tipped well and made it worthwhile for the staff.
Most interesting to me is this question: What did the mutineers get for settling the case?
The answer isn't clear.
The Times reported that Dow paid the men "a substantial sum." But the Wall Street Journal quoted a company spokesman saying that Dow had "secured some of what it had sought in the lawsuit it filed last spring, including reducing the amount of equity compensation the men received during their employment at Dow. The spokesman also said Dow is not paying any damages that Kreinberg and Reinhard sought in defamation suits they filed against Dow last year."
But the WSJ report also quotes Reinhard's lawyer, Gary Naftalis, saying his client is "very satisfied with the financial aspects of the settlement."
Given the millions he hoped to pocket from this deal, I don't think Reinhard would be "very satisfied" with nothing.
I'm sure the numbers will come out eventually. If we've learned anything from this escapade, we know that eventually someone will talk.
Folks in New London, Conn., are debating whether a urethane foam blob, painted orange and appearing to flow down the front of a downtown building, is art.
Check out the photo on the link above. You'll see why Barry Neistat, owner of the Muddy Waters Cafe next door told the New London The Day newspaper, "It looks like King Kong climbed the building and threw up."
The comments section of the story has some other terrific descriptions: Creamsicle melting, toxic sludge, and many more. The paper even started a "What should we call that Blob on Bank Street?" contest.
I think the blob is pretty impressive looking, and it certainly seems to have people talking. From time-to-time artists and their agents contact Plastics News with pitches for stories about their work in plastics media. A lot of the stuff is interesting, but typically not the kind of thing we write about. But I'm happy to include the blob in our blog today, and to thank Frank Antosiewicz, our correspondent in South Hadley, Mass., who alerted me to the story.
The Los Angeles Times Emerald City blog has a post today on the subject of corporate sponsorships of "green" events, and much of the focus is on PET bottles.
It seems that the Heal the Bay group had a dinner party/fundraiser last night. While the group's brochure said there would be no bottled water served at the event, attendees actually got PET bottles of a product called Bone Water in their gift bags. On top of that, a brand that's often criticized by environmentalists, FIJI Water, had a page in the dinner brochure.
I'm not saying Heal the Bay was wrong to accept these sponsorships or products, necessarily. I'm just pointing out the quandaries to say I don't envy the jobs of the people who work there. Sure, I really do have a bone to pick with this Bone Water thing -- but every environmentalist has her pet peeve, and every little compromise the nonprofit makes must bring forth a cacophony of complaints --
Her comments are something for plastics companies to keep in mind. Sponsoring or contributing to an environmental project or effort might win some support. But don't expect it to change everyone's mind.
It looks like sailing across the Pacific Ocean in a craft made of plastic bottles isn't an original idea after all.
A few weeks ago I wrote about the upcoming voyage of The Plastiki, a boat made of post-consumer plastic bottles that is preparing to make a San Francisco-to-Australia voyage.
Today I'll share news of a similar trip, from Hermosa Beach, Calif., to Hawaii, by a sailboat called Junk.
Junk, which is made from 15,000 plastic bottles, is scheduled to set sail on Sunday. The trip's aim is to "raise awareness about plastic debris fouling our oceans," according to the project's blog.
If the marine debris issue isn't on your radar now, I think it's going to be very soon.
Junk is part of the Algalita Marine Foundation's "Message in a Bottle" project, all aimed at problems associated with plastic debris.
I had more fun with this post when I imagined that Jim Cramer delivered it by screaming at me from my TV.
Cramer today picked Owens-Illinois Inc. stock as a "buy" on the CNBC "Stop Trading!' segment. He gave a pretty anti-plastics reason for the selection. O-I makes glass bottles, and Cramer likes glass a lot more than plastics.
"I have to emphasize to people," Cramer said, "at a certain point we're going to come around. ... Glass doesn't have toxins.
"Everybody else uses glass around the globe. You can recycle it 30 times," Cramer said. He predicted that consumers will turn to glass instead of plastic.
I assume he knows that glass is also heavy, which makes it costlier to transport, and that it uses more energy to create than plastics. Those would seem to be very important considerations with oil near $130 per barrel.
And someone might want to talk to him about that plastics=toxins theory.
Last year we celebrated the 100th anniversary of plastics, which got its start when Leo Baekeland filed his famous “heat and pressure” patent for phenol formaldehyde on July 13, 1907.
This year, we must note the somewhat creepy side of the Baekeland family history, with the limited U.S. release this weekend of "Savage Grace." The movie stars Stephen Dillane as plastics heir Brooks Baekeland; Julianne Moore as his wife, Barbara; and Eddie Redmayne as their son, Tony.
Here's the plot, summed up in 20 words thanks to Wikipedia:
The story is based on the Baekeland family and the dysfunctional, incestuous relationship between Antony Baekeland and Barbara Daly Baekeland.
Hmm. I think I'll pass. Even "Sex in the City" has got to be better.
The towns of Telluride and Aspen, Colo., are taking a different approach to the plastic bag issue. Instead of proposing taxes or bans, they've set up a friendly competition to try to get residents to use reusable bags instead of plastics grocery bags.
The Telluride Watch newspaper has a story about "The Great Plastics Bag Reduction Challenge." Starting Saturday, groceries in both towns will donate 5 cents to their town's Green Fund every time a reusable bag is used or purchased until July 6.
Whichever town raises the most money per capita will win two solar monitor sets from the runner-up for use in the public schools. Plus have bragging rights over the other, of course.
The idea got its start a few months ago when SMA partnered with The New Community Coalition to initiate a plastic bag reduction campaign in Telluride and Mountain Village. The goal was to raise awareness for the environmental and social cost of the single-use plastic bag and to promote a "European" approach to shopping in which people would shop with reusable bags rather than rely on paper or plastic to get their goods home.
Sounds easy enough, but strictly volunteer efforts at reducing the use of plastic bags are ineffective, according to [Sheep Mountain Alliance project coordinator David] Allen.
But rather than lobby for a plastic bag fee or tax like one in Ireland that successfully reduced plastic bag consumption by 90 percent, or an ordinance banning the bags outright as was passed last year in San Francisco, SMA tried to think up a way to give the community a positive, not punitive, motivation to voluntarily embrace the reusable bag.
"We want to disprove all the statistics that say that voluntary reduction efforts don't work," he said.
Sounds like a good idea. Consumers who prefer plastic -- including lots of folks with dogs, I'm sure -- can continue to use "disposable" bags.
I've got one suggestion for any community considering copying this idea. How about giving credit to people who are offered a bag but turn it down? Or for taking a batch of bags back to the store to be recycled?
The Prensa Latina state news agency in Cuba is reporting that Cuba will produce more than 14,000 homes per year, mostly from PVC, thanks to a joint project with Venezuela.
The project will ease a housing shortage in Cuba, according to another report.
Cuba calls the homes "Petrocasas," and says it will build about 40 of the 753-square-foot homes daily. The manufacturing equipment to make the components (one would assume extrusion lines, although the story does not say) will be installed in September.
About 75 percent of each structure will be made of PVC, according to the Prensa Latina report. It will take eight working days to build each one, and officials expect them to last about 50 years.
Cuba plans to start producing its own PVC resin in 3-4 years, according to the Prensa Latina report.
Considering the problems that PVC extruders in North America are experiencing right now, it's too bad that the Cubans can't buy housing components from suppliers in the U.S. and Canada, instead.
Elizabeth Royte, a noted science and environmental author, has a new book, "Bottlemania: How Water Went On Sale And Why We Bought It," that's going to be in the news in the next few weeks. Here's a link to a review from the Huffington Post, and an excerpt from the book, courtesy of alternet.org.
From the excerpt, it is clear that Royte is a good writer. She weaves facts and humor together in an entertaining style:
Like iPods and cell phones, bottled water is private, portable, and individual. It's factory- sealed and untouched by human hands-a far cry from the public water fountain. (Fiji exploits this subliminal germophobia with its slogan "Untouched by Man," as does a company called Ice Rocks that sells "hygienic ice cubes"-springwater hermetically packaged in disposable plastic.) Somehow, we've become a nation obsessed with hygiene and sterility. Never, outside of an epidemic, have we been more afraid of our own bodies. Supermarkets provide antibacterial wipes for shopping cart handles. Passengers bring their own linens to cover airline pillows. Supermarkets wrap ears of corn in plastic: corn still in its husk! (The downside, besides mountains of waste, is the development of super-resistant bacteria immune to most of the commonly used antibiotics.)
There's also a fun story about how she didn't take a taste of Poland Spring water when she visited Tom Brennan, natural resources manager for Nestle Waters North America, in a visit to Hollis, Maine, because Royte was afraid she'd like it more than the tap water she brought to the interview.
Watch for more coverage of "Bottlemania," and an accompanying new wave of TV and new reports critical of the bottled water sector.
A couple of plastics-related stories today have a Wal-Mart Stores Inc. connection. First, the retailer announced on Monday that its stores in Canada are phasing out plastic packaging from its energy-saving light bulbs.
"The change will eliminate an estimated 150,000 pounds of PVC plastic waste each year, increase package recyclability and save natural resources," the company announced in its news release. It cited its "packaging scorecard" as a driver in the decision.
Meanwhile, Wal-Mart, Toys "R" Us Inc. and Target Stores Inc. announced that they have instructed their toy suppliers to meet strict new standards on the amount of lead and other materials. The retailers' standards are stricter than what is called for by House and Senate bills, according to this Associated Press story. The story goes on to address some plastics-related materials: phthalates and bisphenol A.
Bentonville-based Wal-Mart told its suppliers to reduce the amount of phthalates, a chemical used to soften plastics. The updated Wal-Mart requirement matches rules in California, standards Toys "R" Us and Target say they will also meet. The California rules limit phthalates to 0.1 percent.
That looks like the last word on the subject of phthalates and childrens' products. Others can continue the debate. But once Wal-Mart decides, suppliers will find a way to meet the standard.
Actually, Jennie Pollock does explain why she's doing this in one of her blog posts. It's because she was challenged to do so for a story assignment. But she doesn't explain why, though. I suppose the average Rockford Woman reader just assumes that plastics are bad and should be avoided. It's one of those things that goes without saying.
Although the blog initially promises a life without plastic, it seems that the actual exercise has taken a different direction. What she's really doing is trying to spend a week without buying anything made of plastic.
As we've learned so far, it's made buying bandages, food and toys difficult.
Sorry, but it's tough to write about this exercise without being a bit sarcastic.
I understand that not everyone is going to see the value in every plastic product. But trying to live without all plastics isn't any "greener" than trying to live without aluminum, steel, glass, or paper, is it?
Here are a few sports-related items that caught my eye today.
First, a story from a news Web site in England about a team using inflatable soccer goalposts. The goals were used in a match between Hackbridge Primary School and the Stanley Park Juniors.
The PVC iGoal inflates on the spot, has a built-in net, and looks pretty much like the "real" thing. In addition to portability, there's a safety advantage, too. A significant number of injuries occur every year when kids hang on portable soccer goals.
I wonder how the ball rebounds off of the inflatable goals, especially in comparison to wood and metal posts and crossbars.
Now if they could only make a pitch that's pre-mowed and lined. No, wait, they do! But that brings me to the second sports-related link of the day. In the past few weeks, I've seen a number of stories questioning the safety of artificial turf. This story from USA Today, for example, reported that a half-dozen artificial fields in New York and New Jersey have been closed because of concern about high levels of lead in the turf fibers. Now the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is investigating.
The closed fields include four New Jersey surfaces — in Jersey City, Newark, Hoboken and at the College of New Jersey in Ewing — as well as a high school field in Cicero, N.Y., that were found to contain high levels of lead. Another closed high school field in Liverpool, N.Y. is being tested.
New Jersey health officials discovered the lead, used in pigment to color some fields, in the turf fibers. Kids and athletes could be exposed by inhaling or swallowing lead-laced turf fibers or "dust" kicked up by those playing on the fields, state epidemiologist Eddy Bresnitz says.
There have been no known cases of illness attributed to the fields, but at least four of the closed fields will be torn up and replaced with new artificial surfaces.
Other fields around the United States are being tested, and California is looking into whether signs should be posted near artificial turf fields warning that users could be exposed to toxic chemicals.
Artificial turf manufacturers, meanwhile, say the product is safe. They held a news conference yesterday to present findings from an "expert panel" that concluded, in part, that lead does not leach from synthetic turf, and the "amount of ingested turf required to pose a threat is absurdly unrealistic."
Minneapolis TV station KARE-11 has the intriguing headline "What's the deal with the big duck," along with a photo of a giant yellow "toy" duck in front of the Minnesota State Capitol. The story is about an effort to gain support for a bill that would ban phthates from some children's products.
The Duck
Senator Sandy Rummel, DFL - White Bear Lake, is the chief author of the bill in the senate.
She said she was elected to protect people from harmful things and who better to protect than Minnesota's children.
"We need to remove risk and there should be no acceptable risk especially when it comes to children," said Sen. Rummel.
"We live in a chemical world and some of those chemicals are unsafe and we know that."
I imagine we'll see this duck at other State Capitols around the country in coming weeks. If we can get a copy of the duck's itinerary, we'll know what state legislatures will be looking at phthalate bans this summer.
I wonder if it's also available for birthday parties?
Having your heart in the right place is a nice quality. But it often makes for bad public policy, and in the case of Baltimore City Councilman James Kraft, D-1, the practice of putting his emotions first seems to have displaced his head.
He equated using plastic bags with Nazi extermination tactics at a City Council meeting earlier this week.
“We don’t want to be criticized by future generations for not doing enough now as were those who dealt with the Germans then,” Kraft said.
So what follows? Should those who use plastic bags be charged with murder? Genocide?
The editorial goes on to suggest that instead of trying to ban plastic bags, Kraft try less drastic measures to improve the environment, such as asking the city of Baltimore to stop buying bottled water, requiring city employees to pay for their own parking to encourage them to use public transportation, and doing more to encourage plastic bag recycling.
The Diane Rehm radio show today (Tuesday, April 29) features a discussion on the bisphenol A safety issue. The show, hosted by WAMU in Washington and nationally broadcast on many National Public Radio stations, is scheduled for 10 a.m. (if you miss it live, you can check the Web site for a recording and a transcript later today).
Scheduled guests are:
Steven Hentges, American Chemistry Council, PhD, Senior Director Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group
Frederick vom Saal, reproductive scientist and professor, Division of Biological Sciences, College of Arts & Science at the University of Missouri-Columbia
Warren Foster, director, center for reproductive care and reproductive biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
John Bucher, associate director, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Concern is mounting because the new generation of biodegradable plastics ends up on landfill sites, where they degrade without oxygen, releasing methane, a greenhouse gas 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. This week the US national oceanic and atmospheric administration reported a sharp increase in global methane emissions last year.
"It is just not possible to capture all the methane from landfill sites," said Michael Warhurt, resources campaigner at Friends of the Earth. "A significant percentage leaks to the atmosphere."
"Just because it's biodegradable does not mean it's good. If it goes to landfill it breaks down to methane. Only a percentage is captured," said Peter Skelton of Wrap, the UK government-funded Waste and Resources Action Programme. "In theory bioplastics are good. But in practice there are lots of barriers."
Recycling companies said they would have to invest in expensive new equipment to extract bioplastic from waste for recycling. "If we could identify them the only option would be to landfill them," said one recycler who asked to remain anonymous. "They are not wanted by UK recycling companies or local authorities who refuse to handle them. Councils are saying they do not want plastics near food collection. If these biodegradable [products] get into the recycling stream they contaminate it.
Our sister publications in Europe, Plastics & Rubber Weekly and European Plastics News, noted today that The Guardian's report didn't really break new ground.
"This and the other issues covered about bioplastics, recycling and oxy-degradables have all been covered over the past few years by PRW and EPN," online editor Katie Coyne wrote. "These include concerns over contamination by bioplastic into oil-based plastics recycling streams."
So far coverage of bioplastics in the United States has been largely uncriticial. It will be interesting to see if the popular press here picks up on The Guardian's lead.
(One notable exception came up on April 16, with this curious story, "Questioning how Biota sprung a leak," from the Telluride, Colo., Daily Planet, which quoted two former employees of a Colorado bottler who alleged that water containers blow molded by a now-defunct company company using corn-based plastic leaked on store shelves.)
Men.style.com, the online home of GQ and Details magazines, has a short blurb and photograph today about a plastics-related environmental project that I had not seen before.
David de Rothschild, described as a "banking heir and Global Warming Survival Handbook author,", plans to set sail in December on an 8,000-mile journey from San Francisco to Australia, on a boat named The Plastiki, made from post-consumer plastic bottles.
The trip will take him through the Eastern Garbage Patch, the area in the Pacific Ocean where floating plastic is said to vastly outnumber marine plankton.
It will be interesting to see what approach the Plastiki voyagers take to encouraging solutions to the marine debris problem.
Kansas City's The Pitch newspaper has a very interesting story about the bisphenol A controversy. The story is told primarily from the perspective of University of Missouri Professor Frederick vom Saal and his team, although it includes reaction from a variety of industry sources.
Vom Saal is the researcher who managed to keep a spotlight on BPA safety for the past decade. It would not be an exaggeration to say that his efforts are responsible for the what we called "the beginning of the end for polycarbonate bottles that contain bisphenol-A in North America" in our April 21 issue.
Here's an excerpt from The Pitch's story:
Vom Saal is a controversial figure in his area of expertise — at least where the manufacturers of bisphenol A are concerned. His willingness to speak frankly about his findings is alarming to the top five makers of bisphenol A: Dow Chemical, Bayer Material Science, Sunoco Chemicals, SABIC Innovative Plastics and Hexion Specialty Chemicals.
More than 6 billion pounds of bisphenol A are produced every year.
"If I were to say to you, 'Oh, here's a pack of birth control pills. I'm going to extract out the hormone and make plastic out of them,' you'd think I was crazy," vom Saal says. "And indeed, the idea that you're using sex hormones to make plastic is just totally insane."
For a decade, vom Saal has seen the chemical industry distort his research and government regulators ignore it.
But after years of quietly publishing studies in scientific journals and presenting papers at toxicological conventions, vom Saal is starting to be heard. Since the first study of bisphenol A came out of vom Saal's lab in 1997, he has been interviewed about the chemical for PBS' Frontline series and by ABC's 20/20. For Fox News, he has measured the amounts of bisphenol A that leach out of plastic baby bottles, and he has even been quoted in subculture-celebrating Vice magazine regarding the Texas-sized island of discarded plastic floating in a remote part of the Pacific Ocean. Recently, he has flown around the country to testify in front of state legislators writing measures against the use of bisphenol A.
The story details some serious allegations against the chemical industry. For example, it describes a 1997 meeting with Dow Chemical Co.'s John Waechter, who offered to replicate vom Saal's research in a larger, industry-funded study.
Vom Saal says he'll never forget Waechter's words: "Can we arrive at a mutually beneficial outcome where you withhold publishing this paper until authorized to do so by the Chemical Manufacturers Association?"
The scientists felt they were being offered a bribe.
Mark Walton, the lead spokesman for Dow Chemical, has been asked about Waechter's visit by media outlets before — Frontline, specifically. He tells The Pitch that what felt to the scientists like bribery was "simply an enormous misunderstanding between what Dr. Waechter attempted to communicate and what was heard by Dr. vom Saal. And there was no intent or effort in any way, shape or form to do anything that would cause Dr. vom Saal to do anything other than to publish science that was accurate."
Vom Saal says that he told Waechter, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his offer.
It was the MU scientists' first glimpse of industry backlash.
Some of the mistakes in the story jumped out as I read them. For example, trying to make a connection between vom Saal's research and the American Plastics Council's "Take another look at Plastic" ad campaign was a ridiculous stretch. And calling the Society of the Plastics Industry a subsidiary of American Chemistry Council is a sloppy mistake.
Still, this is an interesting story, worth reading for anyone involved in BPA- or polycarbonate-related issues.
Vom Saal seems destined to be an individual who will make a major impact on the future of the plastics industry. It's obvious from his comments that his interactions with industry people to date has not impressed him.
"Honesty in industry is not a requirement," vom Saal said. "As a matter of fact, the willingness to be dishonest seems to be the criterion for these people being hired and representing the chemical industry. We're playing on a very uneven playing field when we talk to them."
Entymologists, including Coby Schal of North Carolina State University, have observed that cockroaches prefer paper to plastic. "They really like to live in the creases found in paper bags," said Schal, the nation's top expert on cockroaches. Many cockroach species chew into paper bags to lay their eggs - something they don't do with plastic.
This is a problem beyond just the yuck factor. Darryl Zeldin, a senior scientist with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, says: "Cockroaches significantly increase asthma symptoms in allergic individuals. And while a third of inner-city residents are cockroach-sensitive, sensitivity to cockroach exposure is widespread in our nation - not just in the inner cities."
If Whole Foods' "green" move starts a trend among food stores, it may contribute to New York's asthma epidemic.
It gets worse. The move flies in the face of the enviro mantra to "reduce, reuse and recycle" - in that order. Almost everyone keeps a stash of plastic bags. We reuse them to line garbage cans, bring lunch to work and clean up after the dog - try doing that with paper. Plastic bags are easier to reuse and more efficient to recycle than paper. In fact, starting this summer, New York City will require large stores to offer shoppers recycling bins. (Maybe the city's overbearing emphasis on public health resulted in something positive, this time.)
That makes a lot more environmental sense than San Francisco's governmental greenwash: an outright plastic-bag ban. If you are worried about the environment, reusing plastic bags is a better choice than paper bags, which rarely get reused.
Stier goes on to say that too many people "mindlessly follow green initiatives and bask in how good it feels -- without recognizing the unintended consequences." He gave the example of the Penn and Teller video in which hundreds of people sign a petition to ban water -- they call it dihydrogen monoxide -- because it is a "chemical found in reservoirs and lakes" and used in pesticides and nuclear energy that is finding its way into grocery stores and baby food.
The Today show this morning did an update on its report on plastic container safety. Primarily the report reinforced the message that it delivered yesterday -- that consumers should avoid PVC, polystyrene and polycarbonate containers.
NBC chief medical editor Dr. Nancy Snyderman did clarify that PVC and PS do not contain bisphenol A. But she added that PVC and PS contain "other chemicals like polyvinyl chloride that we know in rat studies can be linked to cancers and other problems." (I think she meant to say vinyl chloride, not polyvinyl chloride, but at this point who really knows.)
Host Matt Lauer asked if her advice was "to err on the side of caution, or to throw caution to the wind?" The question gave Synderman the opportunity to reinforce her view, that consumers should be cautious.
Finally, she suggested that consumers with questions about plastic safety check www.iatp.org, which she described as an "independent organization." The Web site has been down all morning -- no doubt thanks to the Today show plug -- so I haven't been able to check out exactly what it says about various plastics. But I can tell you that the site is the work of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, a non-governmental organization based in Minneapolis. For more information about IATP, check out this link, which says the group "uses its activist network to strong-arm American corporations into endorsing its politically-correct trading model, which includes importing more food from “sustainable” growers in other countries. The group’s most successful push has been in the area of so-called “fair-trade” coffee, which is more expensive to buy because its growers claim to pay their workers drastically above-market wages."
Plastics manufacturers are all too familiar with the problem of having their products counterfeited. Intellectual property is a hot-button issue. But here's a new twist -- researchers in England say they've devised a way to add anti-counterfeiting features to plastic products during the molding process
The news comes from the Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick. In a news release from the school, lead researcher Professor Gordon Smith compared the technology to a watermark, and said it could cost less than 1 percent of the total cost of manufacturing a product.
"There is an enormous amount of interest in anti-counterfeiting technology for plastic products. We at the University of Warwick are working on several processes to prevent plastic components being copied and this 'in mould' process is the first of them to be developed for use," Smith said.
"For commercial reasons we cannot detail collaborators but we are now exploring its use with one company that is plagued by the failure of a counterfeit plastic based safety critical product which is made to look exactly like their safety critical product and therefore damages their reputation as well as losing them sales."
Smith believes manufacturers of DVDs and CDs used in the entertainment and computing markets will be interested in the technology.
Plastic threat to sea life 'exaggerated' -- That's the headline on a news story from The Australian, a Sydney, Australia, newspaper. That was enough to get my attention.
The thrust of the story is that Colin Limpus, introduced as "Australia's leading authority on sea turtles," believes that environmentalists who are lobbying to ban plastic shopping bags are exaggerating their impact on marine life.
"This has been picked up by the conservation community, but these bags would only account for a small proportion of plastic-related injuries," said Limpus, a scientist with the Queensland Environmental Protection Agency.
The bigger threats, according to Limpus: careless boaters and fishing nets.
As he helped release into Moreton Bay 13 sea turtles that had recuperated after being taken sick or injured to Sea World on the Gold Coast, Dr Limpus identified boat strikes as the biggest threat to turtle populations in coastal waters.
About 100 large turtles are killed each year by boats in southeast Queensland compared with an average of 20 boat-related deaths in the late-1980s.
"These animals are mainly adults which take 30 years to reach breeding age, so the losses are substantial," Dr Limpus said.
Conservationists have used sea turtle and other marine animal deaths as a key argument in their campaign to eliminate plastic shopping bags.
The campaign has often cited a Canadian study to demonstrate that 100,000 animals are killed annually by the bags, although the study identified discarded fishing nets as the cause.
If the government really is serious about protecting turtles, it should regulate the speed of boats in areas frequented by turtles, dugongs and other vulnerable marine animals, Limpus said.
"The problem is that the boats are moving so fast that the animals don't have time to get out of the way and below the propeller," he said.
The newspaper also talked to Clean Up Australia chief executive Kerrie-Ann Johnson, who insisted that the impact of plastic bags on marine life had not been exaggerated. She cited a study by the Australian Marine Conservation Society -- although that group's spokesman denied that it had conducted such a study.
It looks like Limpus is using the raging plastic bag ban in Australia to try to focus attention on what he considers a more serious problem. Good for him.
Still, I don't think this is a signal that the marine debris issue isn't real. It's not going away -- especially in California and Hawaii.
The Huffington Post Web site has been host to a mini-debate on the safety of phthlates in recent weeks, including most recently a post from Mark Schapiro, author of the book "Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products."
Whelan: Phthalates are chemicals that are used to make plastics flexible -- and they have been widely used for some fifty years in everything from plastic shower curtains to medical devices to rubber duckies. Phthalates are invisible, unfamiliar (who can pronounce the word, much less spell it correctly?), and totally unknown to almost every parent. So when an activist like Mark Schapiro -- author of Exposed: The Toxic Chemistry of Everyday Products -- claims that "American infants are...sucking on phthalate-contaminated teething rings, ingesting toxins directly into their still-developing, vulnerable bodies," you have the perfect storm: a purportedly hostile, invisible agent attacking your baby. The scaremongers have got you -- all because you are a loving, caring parent.
Contrast the activist scare about phthalates with the scientific reality: there is no evidence whatsoever -- not even a hint -- of health problems from phthalates in any consumer products used by children or adults. That is the conclusion of esteemed scientists from the Food and Drug Administration, Consumer Product Safety Commission, and universities around the world -- and a blue ribbon panel on phthalates and health chaired by former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop. The issue has been addressed and studied extensively. There are more than 1,000 articles on phthalates in the scientific literature. The claimed health risk is totally bogus, based exclusively on results of high-dose rodent experiments. If one were to assume that phthalates should be regarded as dangerous because vast quantities make rodents sick, then we would also have to fear the myriad collection of natural foods (like mushrooms, table pepper, coffee, and nutmeg) that contain chemicals that cause cancer in rodents -- as plenty of all-natural chemicals do, without any corresponding illness in humans.
The scare tactics on phthalates worked like a charm recently in California, since Gov. Schwarzenegger banned most forms of phthalaltes, declaring, "we must take this action to protect our children. These chemicals threaten the health and safety of our children at critical stages of their development." Building on this momentum, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) introduced legislation to ban phthalates nationwide. These regulatory moves will do absolutely nothing to promote the health of children. They will only serve to remove from the market safe, useful products.
Schapiro: In her post, Dr. Whelan, President of the American Council for Science and Health, claims that "there is no evidence whatsoever--not even a hint--of health problems from phthalates used by children or adults." Alas, there is far more than a "hint" of such evidence. My book contains abundant, peer-reviewed evidence of such claims.
Dozens of studies of rodents and, increasingly, of humans have demonstrated precisely that: the evidence suggests strongly that phthalates disrupt the developing endocrine system of infant boys (at this stage, most of the research does focus on boys because phthalates affect production of the male sexual hormone, testosterone). A study published last week in the journal Pediatrics found evidence of phthalates in every one of the 163 infants under thirteen months that a team of scientists tested for the synthetic substance. Why does this matter? Studies in Denmark concluded in 2006 that high levels of phthalates in mother's breast milk contributed to lower levels of testosterone production in their male offspring in the first three months of life.
Closer to home, scientists in the United States have come to similar conclusions. Dr. Shanna Swan, Director of the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology at the Rochester University School of Medicine and Dentistry, showed a corollary between the phthalate intake of pregnant women and decreased ano-genital distance in their male offspring. That study was published in Environmental Health Perspectives, a scientific journal published by the U.S.-government funded National Institutes of Health. She told me shortly after the study was published that one of her fears is that phthalates could be contributing to "the feminization of infant boys."
There's much more if you click through to the links. It's interesting... about six months ago, a reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel called me with some questions about phthalates, and I told him that it didn't seem to be a front-burner issue for the plastics industry. Other issues including bag bans and PET water bottles were getting more attention in the mainstream press. I think that's still the case, but I have a feeling that a lot of people have at least a crude understanding of this issue today.
Most of the stories we see about plastic product bans and taxes quote only people in favor of the restrictions. In fact, often if seems like there's no one at all, outside a few vocal bag makers and their suppliers, who are fighting the trend. So this story from the Palo Alto, Calif., Daily News has a "man-bites-dog" tone -- it's a city where some businesses have actually decided to fight against restrictions on plastic bags and polystyrene foam containers.
According to the story, about 40 businesses are supporting a petition that will be presented to the Palo Alto City Council tonight. The businesses say a ban would not work, and would hurt local stores and restaurants.
"Please don't punish local businesses just to make an empty environmental gesture," the petition reads. "Products don't litter, people do."
The City Council is tentatively set to take action on a bag ban on April 21, and it expects to look at restrictions on PS foam containers this summer.
The story quotes council member Yoriko Kishimoto saying she supports a ban.
"To me it seems like a no-brainer," Kishimoto told the Daily News. "I believe we definitely need to drastically reduce our use of plastic bags." She added that cities have tried for years to increase their plastic bag recycling rates, but the rate still hovers at about 5 percent.
I'm skeptical of that point. I have seen very few efforts by municipalities anywhere to recycle plastic bags -- typically they expect grocery stores to handle that chore.
Plastic pipe is a relatively new product, and manufacturers have always faced tough competition from traditional materials, including concrete, steel and ductile iron. One question that's been tough to answer has been durability -- how will plastic pipe hold up in the field, where it's expected to work without fail for decades at a time?
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc., a Hilliard, Ohio-based manufacturer of high density polyethlyene pipe, recently got some first-hand information about how its pipe is doing, when it examined hundreds of feet of pipe that was installed in Ocean City, Md., as part of a storm water drainage project in 1987.
According to a news release from the company, the inspection revealed that the original pipe was still in excellent condition, even in this demanding application where it is subjected to saltwater, sandy soil and heavy vehicle traffic.
"The inspection definitively concluded that after the initial 20 years of service life, the ADS N-12 HDPE pipe installed in Ocean City is still performing as originally designed with no visual signs of deflection or other defects,” said Nathan Jovanelly, ADS regional engineer.
For more information how plastic pipe holds up, check out this 2007 story from Michigan Contractor & Builder.
Just in time for Easter, the Associated Press has a report on toxic lead levels in plastic Easter eggs.
The report was the result of testing on toys done by Jeffrey Weidenhamer, a chemistry professor at Ashland University, who has his students test Easter items each spring. According to the report, 13 of the 45 items they purchased had paint made with lead.
At Ashland, the biggest lead hazards were found in Easter egg spinning tops, plastic Easter eggs that typically are filled at home with treats, bunny hair clips and chick-style sipper cups -- all exceeding the government paint standard of 0.06 percent lead content.
Weidenhamer said the toys with lead-based paint would pose only a small risk, if the paint doesn't chip and the item is discarded before it deteriorates.
Still, this is a persistent problem for the plastics industry -- particularly for processors in China, since many of the products are made there.
Who in the world thinks it's a good idea to use lead-based paint on a children's toy? There's no excuse -- it has to stop.
The March 15 crane collapse that killed seven people in New York City is being blamed on a broken nylon sling. The New York Times has a story, and photos, posted on its Web site today.
Investigators believe the accident occurred as workers were trying to install a massive square steel collar around the crane’s tower, at the 18th floor of the construction site. They were using a series of manual winches that appeared to have been hung from nylon slings attached to a higher portion of the tower. The collar was to have been attached to the building by steel struts to give the tower added stability.
But the collar broke free and — along with the winches and slings — plummeted down the outside of the shaft, smashing into a second collar at the ninth floor and shearing it from the building before coming to rest on top of a third collar near the base. That destabilized the tower, and the weight of the crane’s cab pulled the tower down onto the buildings to the south, damaging several on 51st and 50th Streets and completely demolishing the town house where the bodies were recovered on Monday.
For investigators who arrived at the site after the accident, the ragged, broken slings immediately raised alarms, according to people involved in the recovery. Construction safety experts said the slings typically cost about $50 and, depending on their size, can lift moderate loads or loads of several tons. But they warned that if the slings are worn or damaged, their strength may be greatly reduced.
Another expert, Steven Dewey, president of All-Lifts, a company in Albany, N.Y., that manufactures construction slings, said slings generally fail only when they are cut or damaged.
S.C. Johnson & Son Inc. is the latest plastics processor to harness wind power in an effort to reduce the company's carbon footprint. The Racine, Wis.-based consumer products company announced March 13 that it has signed a deal to buy wind-generated power to run its big Ziploc bag and Saran wrap manufacturing plant in Bay City, Mich.
The company's news release doesn't mention the word sustainability, but this certainly is part of the trend.
S.C. Johnson said the deal, with Spartan Renewable Energy in Michigan, will provide 46 percent of the plant's power, and will reduce its environmental footprint by 29,500 tons of carbon dioxide annually. The amount of energy S.C. Johnson will save is comparable to the electricity needed to supply 1,800 average homes.
“In addition to helping accomplish our global renewable energy goal, this initiative further reduces the company’s reliance on coal-fired electricity,” said Fisk Johnson, Chairman and CEO of S.C. Johnson. “As a family company, we’re committed to exploring innovative technologies that hold the promise of cleaner, more efficient energy. This is a great step for SC Johnson, and for the future generations that will be affected by the environmental choices all of us make today.”
S.C. Johnson says it has a "legacy of environmental leadership," and the company's advertising frequently highlights those efforts -- for example, its decision to remove chlorofluorocarbons from its aerosol products three years ahead of the 1978 U.S. mandate.
So don't be surprised if the company features its wind-powered plastics film operations in a future TV ad.
(Interestingly enough, another apparently environmentally related move -- to stop using Saran polyvinylidene chloride resins to make Saran wrap -- has never been a featured topic in those advertisements. Perhaps it's too confusing, or maybe they don't want to highlight a change that some consumers might believe hurt the quality of the product.)
Will using more wind power make a difference with consumers? Will they pay a premium for plastic wrap and storage bags made with "sustainable" energy? I think they might. These types of moves certainly give the company a higher profile and a boost to its reputation, which can help with issues like employee recruitment.
MSNBC has in interesting story today on how the plastics industry, specifically T-shirt bag makers and their suppliers, are battling the wave of bans and taxes that started in San Francisco and seems to be sweeping across America.
Sometimes there's a tendency in stories like this to make industry into a villain, but that's not the case here. I think this story is pretty fair. Both sides of the issue have their say, including two representatives from the Progressive Bag Affiliates, Donna Dempsey and Keith Christman.
Here's an excerpt:
The plastics industry had no intention of allowing the San Francisco model to spread without a fight, though. It quickly and quietly joined with retailers and other business interests and launched a successful counterattack, using lobbying muscle to quash proposed bans. In the face of the onslaught, the cities have instituted voluntary recycling programs that proponents of the bans say are ineffective and likely to remain so.
And in at least two instances, plastics interests have turned the tables on their green adversaries by filing lawsuits on environmental grounds in an effort to prevent bans from taking effect.
“The plastic industry … will try to win local battle by local battle,” says Marc Mihaly, director of the environmental law center at Vermont Law School. “They will intimidate where they can. If they can’t intimidate … they will try to influence legislators.”
Plastics industry representatives attribute their successes to a growing realization that plastic bans are misguided.
“The trend is that cities who are taking a look at what San Francisco did … are all taking a step back and going toward recycling,” said Donna Dempsey, a spokeswoman for Progressive Bag Affiliates, which represents plastic bag makers.
The so-far scattered skirmishes are part of a grander battle over bags, a conflict in which plastic and paper industries are fighting for supermarket supremacy while fending off an ecological newcomer: the reusable fabric bag.
The "scattered skirmishes" characterization is interesting. It seems like every week -- almost every day -- I see proposals pop up somewhere to tax or ban plastic bags. In the past week, Massachusetts joined the party, and the plastics industry is preparing for a battle in the United Kingdom, according to our sister publication Plastics & Rubber Weekly.
Does the plastics industry have a winning strategy for fighting bag bans? If not, what should it be doing differently?
When a customer says he wants a part to be lighter, plastics component suppliers figure they've got a foot halfway in the door. But this story by Design News contributing editor Doug Smock notes that Ford Motor Co. is focusing on lighter weight metal -- not plastics -- in its efort to improve fuel economy on vehicles currently being designed.
Smock interviewed Shawn Morgans, Ford's body structure technical leader, who said the carmaker's focus is on using thinner-gauge, high-strength steels.
“I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but our head man is from the aircraft industry and he doesn’t understand why our vehicles aren’t lighter already,” said Morgans. He was referring to Alan Mulally, who became chief executive officer of Ford in 2006 after a 37-year career at Boeing, going from engineer to executive vice president. Mulally was involved in the game-changing decision to go to all-composite aircraft bodies at Boeing.
But despite Mulally's experience at Boeing, Ford apparently isn't hooked on composites. Smock writes that Ford expects to use more high-strength composites in front-end applications, but has "no plans to introduce dramatic new plastic technologies such as carbon-fiber reinforced composites. They’re too expensive right now, said Morgans. There are also technical problems with much-discussed efforts to make roofs out of polycarbonate. Scratch and weathering problems still have to be resolved, said Morgans."
For another opinion on the future of polycarbonate windows and roofs, check the March 10 issue of Plastics News for a feature on Exatec LLC by our Detroit-based staff reporter Rhoda Miel.
The Christian Science Monitor posted a story on its Web site yesterday that touches on some issues that plastics molders, material suppliers and designers can all appreciate. It's the story of John Huling, owner of a vacuum cleaner repair shop in Natick, Mass., who shut down his business this week.
The reason? Today's vacuum cleaners are difficult and costly to repair. When they break, most people throw them away and buy new models.
Huling blames the predominance of plastic parts.
He sighs as a woman comes in with a new machine. Politely referring her elsewhere, he confides, "It's a piece of junk, speaking technically ... that [machine] was made by the company that made the best vacuum cleaner that was ever made and then they switched to plastic."
The way he utters the word leads me to ask about the evils of plastic. His excited cadences take me back to childhood visits when – dislodging socks or Barbie clothes from a clogged hose – he'd counsel my mother on the need for careful attention. "You can't fix half the new vacs," he says. "Everything's plastic now, even the lever that releases the handle that you have to step on every day.... They snap off. By the time I order the parts and charge labor to repair it, you don't want to do it. I'm just waiting for them to tell me they can't fix my car someday!"
I think the "evils of plastic" is a bit overboard -- it's not the plastic that's the problem.
Obviously you can design and manufacture a very durable vacuum cleaner using plastic parts. But too many vacuums on the market today aren't durable. Consumers buy them anyway, rather than spend hundreds more on more dependable, more durable models -- the kind worth repairing, which keep people like Huling in business.
So American consumers have voted with their pocketbooks: they're satisfied with semi-durable products that fall apart after a few years and end up in the trash. Just make 'em cheap, we'll buy more.
Over the long term, is that a sustainable business model? I don't think so. But I can't predict whether that will change next year, 5 years from now, or 100 years after we're gone.
Thanks to EDN.com's Anablog, compiled by technical editor Paul Rako, for tipping me off to this story.
What happens to chemical plants when they finally shut down for good? In Sarnia, Ontario, the plan is to tear down everything and, in a few years, turn a former Dow Chemical Co. site into wetlands.
That's according to this story from The Observer newspaper, which notes that demolition of the 65-year-old polyethylene and polystyrene plant will begin in a few months, even though some production will continue until April 2009. The report quotes Catherine Creber, Dow's site closure leader, who spoke yesterday to the local Golden 'K' Kiwanis Club.
After the property has been cleared, it will be maintained in a natural state, at least until it's sold, she said.
"If it's not sold, we'll put in long grasses, wildflowers and trees," she said. "It's our intention that it will be esthetically pleasing. When you drive over the overpass, you won't see a mess."
I live near a chemical plant that has been cleaned up and reclaimed, the PPG Lime Lakes plant in Barberton, Ohio. It's amazing how a manufacturing site can disappear and return to a natural state in such a short period of time.
Wisconsin is the newest state to debate a ban on plastic grocery bags, according to this story from the Madison, Wis., The Capital Times. The bill was introduced by two Democratic state legislators, Mark Pocan, a represenative from Madison, and Bob Jauch, a senator from Poplar.
The story quotes Brandon Scholz of the Wisconsin Grocers Association saying that biodegradable bags are too expensive, and that consumers have not been pushing for a ban. He also noted that many retailers collect plastic bags for recycling.
"You're finding more and more grocery stores providing receptacles for their customers to bring the bags back," he said. "And there is a market for those bags."
Pocan, one of the bill sponsors, made one point in the story that is a more than a bit simplistic. The story attributes this information to him:
... because plastic bags are made with petroleum, they increase the United States' reliance on foreign crude oil, Pocan said. Biodegradable bags, in contrast, are made with the starch from corn and other agricultural products.
In North America, most polyethylene is made from natural gas, not oil. And agricultural products may come from sunshine and rainbows, but it takes a lot of energy to harvest the crops and turn them into starch-based resins -- by some measures, more energy than is used to make conventional plastics.
GE Plastics skipped exhibiting at NPE 2006, but it looks like the company will be back again next year.
Sabic Innovative Plastics, the company that bought GE Plastics last year, will be exhbiting at NPE 2009, according to this nugget posted today by Bob Martino on the NPE blog:
A grand old name has returned to NPE in a new guise. Sabic Innovative Plastics, the new identity of GE Plastics, has taken a 12,000 sq.ft. booth in the new McCormick West hall. In May of 2007, General Electric Company sold the plastics business to Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC). GE was one of the original exhibitors at the first NPE in 1946 and was missing from NPE for the first time in 2006. But with Sabic the company’s globally supplied range of engineering thermoplastics will be back in the show.
For your background and reading pleasure, here's a story I wrote in October 2006 explaining how GE Plastics was working to reach customers as an alternative to NPE.
It will be interesting to see if more resin companies decide to come back to big plastics trade shows like NPE -- if not next year, then in 2012. Some of the resin companies that have skipped NPE in recent years still have big exhibits at the K fair in Germany and Chinaplas. If there's value in exhibiting at those shows, why not in North America?
What's better for the environment, using less resin to make a PET bottle, or using more material but incorporating recycled plastic into the container? This is one of those questions where the answer depends on your priorities.
First, it's nice to see that they actually look at materials pricing, which is an important consideration for plastics processors and their customers. They also consider landfill tipping costs, since there is a hidden cost to handle all of the PET bottles that aren't recycled, too.
The conclusion: although landfilling used PET bottles is cheaper in the short run, it is wasteful (a half a billion dollars worth of PET bottles were sent to landfills in 2005, acccording to the Container Recycling Institute), especially with virgin resin prices rising. So they acknowledge that using less virgin resin, by making lighter bottles, is a priority, as well as making an effort to use recycled material, too.
Now here’s what we’re going to do with those resources and how we’re going to create jobs.
We will invest 250 million dollars in the advanced and renewable energy economy, including solar, wind and clean coal.
We will invest 150 million dollars in our state’s infrastructure to help create a seamless network of roads, rails, and ports to support our logistics and distribution industry.
We will invest 100 million dollars in bioproducts that use renewable sources instead of petroleum to create plastics and other products.
I'm always skeptical when politicians start talking about where they're going to invest taxpayer dollars. Will they pick the right projects? How do they decide -- and do they have a better record of picking winners than the free market? If Strickland can convince the state legislature to go along with his plan, I guess we'll find out.
Which plastics companies do you think will get in line for a share of that $100 million pot?
“Are we all going to show up in front of the Sun-Times and Tribune building and say, ‘Here’s your plastic bags. You have to take them back?’ Remember, it’s you who’s doing it. You wrap your newspapers in plastic. You should take them back, right? You have a responsibility.”
The mayor added, “Everybody’s against plastic. But let’s think about all the industries it has to do with. I’d rather see the industries do it themselves, truthfully. Not all of the sudden, [say] they want a fine. They want us to sue you. Let’s work this out. [Let’s have] a voluntary approach.”
This is the best line I've seen in an obituary for Richard Knerr: "He left behind a legacy of fun."
That's from a report on National Public Radio's "All Things Considered," and it seems to capture the essence of Knerr, co-founder of Wham-O Inc., the company that made a fortune selling Hula Hoops, Frisbees and other iconic plastic toys to a generation of baby boomers.
Knerr died Jan. 14 at age 82.
Knerr and childhood buddy Arthur "Spud" Melin started a slingshot-selling business in 1948 in Pasadena and called their company Wham-O after what they said was the sound a slingshot made when it hit something.
"They were like John Wayne and Ernest Hemingway all rolled into one. They were all about fun," recalls Richard's son, Chuck.
Melin and Knerr had run a used-car store together in downtown Los Angeles before founding Wham-O. They started making slingshots, just for kicks, out of the ends of orange crates, Chuck recalls.
"Then their barber recommended they put an ad in a magazine and try mail order," he says.
At first business was slow — and the pair struggled to get by on just a couple dollars a day — but gradually the orders were pouring in.
Some other Wham-O plastic classics include the Slip 'N Slide, Silly String, and Superball.
The Hula Hoop has a beloved place in plastics history -- it was the first major application for Phillips Petroleum Co.'s Marlex-brand high density polyethylene.
Add Matt Lauer, host of NBC's "Today" show, to the list of celebrities who are taking a stand against plastic bags. According to the Business & Media Institute Web site, Lauer "pestered shoppers at a Manhattan grocery store for the last installment of the “Today Goes Green” series on January 25."
“Paper or plastic? Turns out the right answer should be neither,” Lauer said, adding that Americans dispose of 100 billion plastic bags every year. “And where does it all go? Everywhere. Just about every piece of plastic we’ve every used still exists, clogging up landfills, spilling over the landscape for washing out to sea.”
“I’m on the prowl for victims, converts in our growing movement,” Lauer said while roaming the aisles of an upscale Food Emporium store in the Bridgemarket neighborhood of New York City. He stopped shoppers to ask questions like, “Do you have any idea how many plastic bags you accumulate in the average month?”
According to the report, Lauer was mostly encouraging shoppers to use reusable totes instead of paper or plastic. He told one that "If you think that we throw away a hundred billion plastic a year, it’s like taking 12 million barrels of oil and dumping it down the drain."
The Business & Media Institute report -- the group says its mission is to "audit the media's coverage of the free enterprise system ... to bring balance to economic reporting and to promote fair portrayal of the business community in the media" -- notes that "...the United States imported more than 10 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2006. Even if Lauer's figure is accurate, plastic bags account for only 0.32 percent of the oil imported into the United States every year."
Much of the mainstream media clearly is embracing the "use less stuff" movement, which in large part seems to be a "use less plastics" movement. Are consumers following their lead? And how will it impact plastics product manufacturers?
Madison, Wis., has a Commission on the Environment that is starting to consider bans on two plastics products. That's according to this story from the Wisconsin State Journal.
The group will discuss a ban on the sale of bottled water at public events, and on the use of plastic grocery bags.
Jon Standridge, chairman of the commission, said members voted unanimously at the end of last year to place both items on upcoming agendas.
"Each year toward the end of the calendar year we sit down and talk about what people are interested in, ' ' Standridge said. "We ask if something is an environmental problem and if it is worth taking up. And if it is worth taking up, is there something we can do? ' '
Both the use of bottled water and the use of plastic grocery bags are issues that are receiving considerable attention elsewhere, Standridge said. Plastic items are problems mostly because they pose tremendous waste disposal issues. Many things are made of plastic, which can be recycled, but when it does end up in landfills it doesn 't break down.
But, Standridge added, plastics also pose environmental threats because of the energy and resources used to manufacture them.
The idea of banning the sale of bottled water at public events seems pretty radical. The story quotes George Dreckmann, the city's recycling coordinator, who suggests that an alternative might be to encourage recycling.
Wisconsin has a pretty large and healthy plastics industry, but I'm not sure if that will make a difference to lawmakers in Madison.
In the meantime, Standridge's commission, which advices the mayor and city council on environmental issues, is at least a year away from making any recommendations on the use of plastic bottles and bags, he told the newspaper.
Here's a story about in-house recycling that a lot of processors could learn from -- and that many could try to pitch to their own local media.
Hoffer Plastics Corp., a South Elgin, Ill., injection molder, is the subject of the feature in the Arlington Heights, Ill., Daily Herald newspaper. It expalins how the company has made a commitment to recycling in late 2007 -- and how the decision is paying off.
In December, the company didn't send any waste to the landfill, according to Gretchen Hoffer Farb, the company's director of supply chain management.
"We're doing everything we can to sustain the environment and recycle. We send truckloads of plastic to a Jackson, Mo., recycler every week," Farb told the newspaper.
Farb said that value is translating to benefits for employees as well.
She estimates the company -- South Elgin's biggest employer -- will net more than $100,000 in the coming year from the initiative.
Although it takes workers more time to sort the materials, some of the funds will or have been used for employee recognition, the summer picnic and a Christmas gift for each worker.
"Without all the employees doing it, it wouldn't be successful," Farb said. "It's extra work, but everybody's embraced it."
Congratulations to Hoffer on implementing this successful program.
Each year, the Statistical Assessment Service (STATS) Web site publishes its "Dubious Data" awards, for activists and journalists who abuse science and statistics. STATS is affiliated with the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.
This year, some plastics-related issues are featured. Here are a few highlights:
If it sounds suspicious, ban it
In June, San Francisco’s mayor, Gavin Newsom, decided to ban plastic water bottles, in part because of concerns about recycling, which was reasonable enough, and in part because they contained “toxic” vinyl softeners known as phthalates, which was, at least metaphorically, garbage. The mayor – and the journalists who dutifully conveyed his fears to the public – seemed oblivious to the fact that plastic bottles do not contain phthalates; they are, instead, made with a polyester called polyethylene terephthalate, which is something quite different even though it seems to sound similar. But that’s chemistry for you. Poylethylene terephthalate, or PET for short, is not considered a health hazard by any regulatory agency in the world.
Perhaps a refresher course in puberty?
Phthalatophobia, a subcategory of chemophobia (the fear of chemicals), led the media to make all sorts of remarkable claims in 2007, none more ballsy, perhaps, than Time magazine’s decision to advance puberty beyond the bounds of biological plausibility with the claim, in September, that inhaling phthalates from air fresheners could decrease sperm levels in infants.
Perhaps, Time was demonstrating that the mere act of reporting on toxic chemicals can cause mental derangement, as a) infants don’t produce sperm and b), the author of the study on phthalates in air fresheners, Dr. Gina Solomon of the Natural Resources Defense Council, admitted that had no “clear cut evidence here for health effects.” This comment was something of a let down from urgent wording of the NRDC press release, which claimed that phthalates were “particularly dangerous for young children and unborn babies.”
There are more, including the flurry of news stories that Greenpeace generated when it ranked Apple Computer at the bottom of its list of envronmentally friendly computer companies. Check out the link for that and more, as well as links to the STATS "Dubious Data" awards from 2005 and 2006.
For more Web sites that offer plastics-related science, check out the American Council on Science and Health's HealthfactsandFears.com Web site, the American Chemistry Council's plastics mythbuster site, or the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.'s mythbuster site. If you have your own favorite, feel free to post it in the comments section.
According to cool Toronto blog blogTO, the last vinyl factory in Canada recently shut down.
For triva buffs, the last vinyl record produced in Canada was the single "Flesh Python" by Toronto-based electronic pop/alternative band vitaminsforyou.
"It is true that the vinyl factory is closing due to the retirement of our master pressman and plant manager", confirmed Aaron Zon, Vice President of Music Manufacturing Services (MMS). "We are indeed the last Canadian plant standing (that I'm aware of anyway)."
Do you have a favorite Canadian performer? A favorite Canadian album? Please, no Celine Dion or Bryan Adams posts!
India's Tata Group generated headlines around the world this week when it unveiled the long-promised Nano, a $2,500 car aimed primarily at emerging markets. Plastics play a big role in the Nano, but not necessarily in some of the applications that were originally planned.
The Times of India has a very interesting question-and-answer interview with Tata Group Chairman Ratan Tata, which covers some of the plastics details, as well as a wide vareity of other issues.
Here are a few of the plastics-related tidbits:
We decided to look at everything from scratch. I thought that we could have a car made from engineering plastics that would not be welded but use adhesives. But some of these concepts did not lend themselves to costs or volume manufacturing. So we moved on to a more conventional kind of car.
That led us to configure a small car which would be a full-fledged car. We started again in an evolutionary way. It started with a concept of being a four-wheeled rural car. Do we have roll up plastic curtains instead of windows? Do we have openings like autorickshaws have instead of doors, but have a safety bar? We had many such early concepts and we finally decided that the market did not want a half car. If we wanted to build a people's car it should be a car and not something that people would say, 'That is a scooter with four wheels or an autorickshaw on four wheels'. And so we decided to do a car and really pare the cost.
Can we expect to see the Nano in the United States? Tata thinks so. Asked "who are your potential customers?" he replies: "Rather than look at it geographically, look at who might be the buyer of the small car. If you look in the US or Europe, in some garages that have a Bentley or two, or a high-end Mercedes, you may also find a Smart (a subcompact car from Mercedes). Because that person thinks that it is a fun extra car to have. Then you may have a person who needs utilitarian transport and is not looking for a lot of creature comforts. Then you look at someone who is thinking of owning or owns an existing small car—to him this makes sense because it is more fuel efficient and costs less. On the other side, you have someone who aspires for a car. And this can come from anywhere in the country."
There's been a flurry of news about plastic bag bans this week, including news that China will ban some bags (I imagine that will be a very difficult law to enforce), and Australia may do the same.
On top of that, today the New York City Council voted not to ban bags, but to require many retailers to recycle them. (Check out the flurry of comments at that link, a couple of dozen in just a few hours!)
The New York Times weighs in on the issue here, with a quick opinion piece encouraging readers not to use plastic bags at all:
Plastic bags now represent an estimated three percent of the waste stream — and that percentage is rising. It can, however, be reduced through effective recycling.
Some municipalities already have such programs, but none is as sweeping as the measure passed today by the New York City Council. It would require plastic bag recycling for stores of at least 5,000 square feet or stores belonging to chains with more than five locations in the city.
Considering the size of the New York market, where about one billion plastic bags are used every year, the mandate is enormous. The law could go into effect by early summer.
What will become of these bags? They can find new life pressed into durable composite lumber, like that used in decks and boardwalks. Or they could be made into more plastic bags, and presumably re-recycled indefinitely.
Better still, the new law might just encourage people to forego the plastic and carry their own reusable bag for shopping and chores.
After all, from an environmental perspective, the best answer to the ubiquitous question “Paper or plastic?” is “Neither.”
The Associated Press has a fairly good laundry list of bag bans, taxes and other laws around the globe, although this seems to be a list that changes almost daily.
The news that oil traded for $100 per barrel yesterday for the first time generated a boatload of news stories today, many of them mentioning that higher prices could mean plastics will get more expensive. (I won't start a whole debate on that topic in this post, although I welcome comments. We've had a variety of items in recent months about whether the link between oil and plastics pricing is real or spurious).
The most interesting story I found, though, is one that pooh-poohs the $100-per-barrel trade itself. Apparently the transaction may have been a sham, according to this story in the London Daily Mail:
An independent trader 'seeking his moment of fame' caused oil prices to hit unprecendented levels of $100-a-barrel yesterday following a single deal.
The buyer, who was trading on his own money bought 1,000 barrels of crude oil from a colleague, which is the minimum allowed.
Strangely, he then sold then back almost immediately, making a loss of $600. The move left industry insiders questioning the reasons behind the deal.
Let's call it the trade that launched a thousand "trend stories" around the globe. A word to the wise: don't cite this news story when you call your customers and tell them why you need to raise your prices.
A coalition of beverage industry trade groups plans to challenge a tax on water bottles by the city of Chicago that is scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1.
In the past few days, newspapers and TV stations in Chicago have done stories on how consumers plan to buy bottled water in the suburbs to avoid the tax. Opponents of the tax say it is illegal, and that it will hurt retailers in the city. Dave Vite, CEO of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, told the Chicago Tribune: "People are already leaving the city when it comes to gas, alcohol and cigarettes. This will affect anybody that sells bottled water, because when customers do migrate, they take other business with them."
Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley proposed the tax to help the city government erase a budget deficit -- but the proposal may have gained traction because of growing criticism of the environmental impact of the bottled water industry.
If the lawsuit doesn't put a stop to Chicago's tax, expect other cities to try the same trick.
The dealReporter news service is reporting today that although some strategic buyers are interested in pieces of Fairlawn, Ohio-based compounder and distributor A. Schulman Inc., none are interested in paying a premium for the whole company.
The story, on the London-based Financial Times Web site, depends a lot on a single source, who is not named but described as "claiming knowledge of the situation." It also cites an unnamed "industry banker" who said he did not see an opportunity to break up Schulman.
Given that both sources are quoting the company's own point of view, it wouldn't be a surprise if at least one turned out to be a company executive or board member. But, frankly, the report rings true. Sure, Alcoa Inc. got a premium price for its packaging business, but does anyone out there really think Schulman could generate the same level of interest from buyers if it put the company on the auction block today?
According to the report, there are buyers interested in Schulman's compounding plants in Europe (no surprise there). The source also claims that Eastman Chemical Co. is interested in parts of Schulman, and Wellman Inc. "has indicated interest on a partnership basis." That part is a little surprising, although Wellman itself already is in play.
Schulman, meanwhile, continues to battle with dissident shareholder Ramius Capital. Yesterday, Schulman released a letter from board member Will Holland urging shareholders to reject a competing slate of directors offered by Ramius. Here's a copy of the letter:
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
For the past two years, A. Schulman's Board of Directors has listened to shareholder concerns and taken a number of significant actions to address them. We have also made great strides in transforming our business, even in the face of difficult industry-wide market conditions.
This is a time of great change and opportunity at A. Schulman. We recently announced that our long-serving CEO, Terry Haines, is retiring and that Joseph M. Gingo, an A. Schulman Board member, has been appointed as his replacement. Mr. Gingo most recently served as Executive Vice President, Quality Systems and Chief Technical Officer for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, a $20 billion public company. The Company will benefit from his international operational experience and technical background, as well as his intimate knowledge of the workings of A. Schulman. Mr. Gingo operated four divisions during his career at Goodyear (three of which were global) with revenues of up to $1.2 billion, and was a key participant on a strategic turnaround team project which ultimately resulted in the divestiture of significant business lines for substantial value. He is the ideal candidate to lead A. Schulman, building on the progress we have made across our business and bringing fresh perspective that will allow this Company to continue to enhance shareholder value.
In addition, the Company has already agreed to nominate Stanley W. Silverman, another experienced, independent director to join the Board, and to establish a special director committee, chaired by an independent director new to the board, to consider all strategic options available to the Company. Mr. Silverman will enhance both the independence and the expertise of the board through his significant previous operational experience as the President and CEO of a public company in the specialty chemicals industry. Further, the business plan we have put in place is beginning to pay dividends and we are well-positioned for the next phase of A. Schulman's growth. We are committed to delivering value for our shareholders and have shown openness to considering all options that will accomplish this.
As you may be aware, Ramius Capital has nominated a competing slate of directors to stand for election at the 2008 annual meeting, seeking to replace two of our experienced board members, James Karman and the Company's new CEO, Mr. Gingo. Removing them from the Board would hinder the implementation of the Company's ongoing strategic initiatives that are beginning to show results. Ramius is taking this step despite the significant operational progress we have made to date and the meaningful actions we have taken to address shareholder concerns -- including Ramius'. Ramius fails to explain how adding its two director nominees will improve shareholder value.
A. Schulman's Board already has fresh perspective in place and has and will continue to hold management accountable. Since 2005, the company has added four new directors independent of the Company, including James A. Mitarotonda, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Barington Capital Group, L.P., one of our largest shareholders. The company has worked closely with Mr. Mitarotonda and Barington in good faith to comply with our past agreements and in the pursuit of additional measures in our efforts to be responsive to shareholder interests and to enhance shareholder value. Mr. Mitarotonda was a key member of a three-member special committee of our board which helped craft and implement our significant cost-cutting initiatives and restructuring plans in 2007. As our meeting on January 10, 2008 draws near, we wanted to provide you with the most up-to-date and accurate information regarding our long-term plans so that you can make an informed decision.
THE BOARD BELIEVES IT HAS IMPLEMENTED THE RIGHT OPERATIONAL BUSINESS PLAN, COST STRUCTURE, STRATEGIC REVIEW PROCESS, MANAGEMENT TEAM AND BOARD COMPOSITION TO CREATE SIGNIFICANT ONGOING VALUE FOR SHAREHOLDERS. RAMIUS' NARROWLY FOCUSED ACTIONS WOULD ONLY DISTRACT FROM THIS PROCESS.
COMMITTED TO TRANSFORMING OUR BUSINESS
We believe we have implemented the right business plan to grow and enhance shareholder value. Our main objectives are to return North America to profitability, grow Europe profitably and maximize the successful launch of our key new product, Invision.
-- In North America, we have successfully streamlined our business units to focus on three growth areas: polybatch; engineered compounds; and merchant, distribution and rotomolding. For the last quarter of 2007, excluding the investment costs for Invision and corporate spending, our North American business generated operating profit.
-- In Europe, we are working on the integration of the Deltaplast Color Business and are continuing to grow our business in Asia. We will also continue to maintain vigilance on cost controls while growing in strategic markets worldwide.
-- Inventory reduction initiatives helped drive cash flow from operations to $65 million in 2006, up from $19 million in 2005.
-- We recently launched Invision, a new multi-layered sheet product that leverages A. Schulman's manufacturing base and technical abilities. It already shows strong promise of providing high-growth opportunities in many markets globally, and we believe that Invision will add significant value going forward as customer acceptance grows.
With innovations like Invision and the successful streamlining of our North American business, we believe we are well on our way to making our growth goals a reality and delivering enhanced value for shareholders.
REALIGNING OUR COST STRUCTURE TO DELIVER SHAREHOLDER VALUE
Over the past year, we have implemented a number of cost-cutting initiatives and a restructuring plan aimed at promoting profitability in the Company's North American business segment and the Company's overall long-term success. We expect to save an annual $18 million through cost reductions affecting all lines of the A. Schulman P&L.
Examples of these cost-cutting initiatives include selling, general and admin reductions, headcount and capacity.
Since 2000 we have:
-- Improved North American operations by eliminating 35% of manufacturing capacity and 33% of headcount.
-- Closed 10 sales offices and consolidated order management in Akron.
-- Consolidated all freight and warehousing with a single service provider.
In addition, last year a special committee of the Board was formed that resulted in $8 million in cost savings. The committee was a well-balanced effort by the Board, comprised of one significant shareholder representative (James Mitarotonda), one new independent board member (David Birney) and one experienced board member (John Yasinsky).
Going forward, management and the Board will work closely together to rigorously review and control expenses.
LISTENING TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS AND TAKING ACTION TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS
A. Schulman's Board is diverse, experienced, highly qualified, and independent and we believe our shareholders benefit from this broad perspective. We have instituted several steps to improve corporate governance and address shareholder concerns:
-- Added four outside independent directors to the Board since 2005.
-- Nominating an additional independent director, Stanley W. Silverman, as recommended by our third largest shareholder, Barington, for election at this annual meeting, bringing the total number of outside directors to 11, of which 5 have either been directly recommended or approved by Barington. Mr. Silverman will bring valuable expertise to the board, as he has served as President and CEO of PQ Corporation, a public company which is a leading global producer of specialty chemicals and engineered glass materials. He also has served as a business advisor to private equity firms, performing due diligence on acquisition targets in the manufacturing and manufacturing services industries, and currently serves on the board of directors of C&D Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: CHP) and as executive in residence at the Krall Center for Corporate and Executive Education at the Lebow College of Business of Drexel University.
-- Created a Lead Independent Director position.
-- Terminated a "poison pill" in 2007 and adopted a policy consistent with ISS guidelines.
-- Amended the corporate certificate of incorporation to remove supermajority voting for approval of business combinations.
-- Linked management bonuses to key performance metrics of cash flow, return on invested capital and operating profit.
-- Adopted new internal management standards and initiated a new internal audit function.
-- Established a new special committee of the board, including Mr. Mitarotonda and two of the recently added independent directors, to consider all strategic options for the company, addressing Ramius' primary concerns as expressed in its shareholder proposal.
It is important to note that Barington and Ramius were originally partners in advocating for change at A. Schulman. However, while our management and Board have been working cooperatively with Barington since 2005, Ramius ended its affiliation with Barington apparently in order to agitate and push its Board nominees instead of supporting our strategic plan, which addresses the same issues Ramius has raised.
Barington has made valuable contributions to the Company and we look forward to continuing to work with them. We believe the Company's slate of directors will allow us to focus on the Company's future and what's best for all shareholders.
A. SCHULMAN BOARD IS OFFERING THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION TO DELIVER VALUE FOR SHAREHOLDERS
The Company's proposed slate is committed to a course of action that will deliver value for shareholders:
-- Special committee formed to consider all strategic alternatives
-- Share repurchase program approval increased to 5 million
-- Positioned to turn around financial performance in North America
-- Completing restructuring and cost-cutting initiatives
-- Maximizing value of Invision
A. SCHULMAN'S BOARD IS INDEPENDENT, ENGAGED AND HOLDING MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTABLE:
-- If the A. Schulman slate is elected, 11 of 12 board seats will be held by independent outside directors.
-- James Karman has extensive experience in the specialty chemical industry, including service as Vice-Chairman of RPM International, Inc., a manufacturer of coatings, sealants, and specialty chemicals with more than $3.4 billion in revenue.
-- As CEO, Mr. Gingo will provide reinvigorated Company leadership. Mr. Gingo has excellent knowledge of all aspects of the polymer business, as well as the workings of A. Schulman, particularly the Invision technology, and will be instrumental in taking this Company to the next level. Mr. Gingo has operated four public company divisions (of which three were global) with revenues of up to $1.2 billion, and played a key role as part of a strategic turnaround team for a $20 billion public company which ultimately resulted in the divestiture of significant business lines.
Ramius and its nominees are not offering a different strategy for the company -- they are simply distracting from our ongoing value-creating process.
MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE
We strongly recommend that you vote FOR the A. Schulman nominees and AGAINST Proposal No. 3 by voting the WHITE proxy card by Internet, telephone or mail. We urge you not to sign any other proxy cards that may be sent to you by other shareholders. If you have previously returned another proxy card, you can automatically revoke it by signing, dating and returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the accompanying envelope. If you need assistance or have any questions, please call Georgeson, which is assisting A. Schulman with the proxy solicitation, at 877-668-1646.
In closing this letter, I want to express our thanks to our employees for their hard work and diligence and thank you, our shareholders, for your loyalty and support as we continue to execute our long-term strategic plan.
Not all of the stories are specifically related to plastics, but there was another flurry of headlines today about the safety of toys -- many of them made in China -- that contain lead.
Consumer Reports magazine, for example, had this blog item about Fisher-Price pulling a plastic toy blood pressure cuff off the market because of complaints there about lead content -- but keeping the product on store shelves elsewhere because it is "fully compliant" with federal regulations.
That strikes me as being a odd reaction. If the product is safe, why take it off the market in Illinois? But if it's dangerous, why keep it on store shelves elsewhere?
Meanwhile, the Michigan-based Environmental Health Project of the Ecology Center garnered a lot of attention with its report on lead and toys, including this blog item in the Wall Street Journal, and this related story.
My kids are beyond toy age -- can anyone please find lead in Ugg boots and Coach purses? -- but I imagine that some parents are going to be very confused about what toys are safe this Christmas season. Will this story disappear after the Christmas shopping season, or will the public -- and regulators -- care enough to do something about it in early 2008?
The story is part of a regular feature that Skrzycki writes called "The Regulators," which concentrates on federal regulations on U.S. business.
How does the Post do? Well, the headline is shocking ... comparing vinyl to lead is going to attract attention, but it's a reach. In the column itself, she tries to achieve some balance, with comments both from Greenpeace's Rick Hind and from the American Chemistry Council. She ties in a few recent stories on how Apple and Target have responded to pressure to drop vinyl, along with some context about the debate.
This is a complicated issue, and I think in a few places she boils it down too far, at least for readers who don't have sufficient background on the debate. For example, this passage: "Though much of the science is still being debated, activists say PVC causes developmental delays in children..." might be enough to scare someone into ripping the PVC pipe out of their basement.
Here's another problem, but it's small -- at the end of the column she quotes us, saying:
A Nov. 16 article in Plastics News, an industry trade publication, summed up it up best: "There's no way to spin this -- it's bad news for vinyl."
Actually, the item that she's quoting is an editorial that ran in our Nov. 19 issue, although it was posted to our Web site on Nov. 16. I think it's important to differentiate editorials from news stories (although at the Post, some might say there's less of a difference).
What do you think of Skrzycki's take on vinyl? Feel free to comment here, or click through to see the opinions of Post readers, in the comment section of the column's Web page.
The New York Times is officially in favor of banning plastic bags. In an editorial posted on Dec. 2, the paper said "banning plastic bags would be a relatively effortless way to protect the environment, save energy and reduce a danger to wildlife as well as dogs and other pets."
Here's an excerpt from the column:
Here are some facts: Unlike paper bags, which can be easily recycled, relatively few plastic bags (about 7 percent) are ever used a second time. They last what seems an eternity, probably longer than most of the people using them. They put toxins in the soil, water and food chain. They are made of oil, something we should be saving rather than using when we do not need it. (It takes millions of barrels of oil to make the 100 billion plastic bags that Americans use in a year.)
And, as you may have noticed, they fly and tumble with the wind — to bodies of water where they endanger fish and aquatic life and to low-lying shrubs, lawns and woodlands where they pose a real danger for wildlife and pets that get tangled up in them. Dogs have been known to choke on them.
This column goes a bit farther than a column the paper ran on Nov. 25, which supported a bill that would encourage recycling of plastic bags.
The Houston Chronicle, meantime, had a story on its Web site this weekend on how plastic bag makers including Superbag Corp. and the Progressive Bag Alliance trade group are fighting back against bag ban proposals -- and New York is a key battleground.
The plastic bag industry hopes that recycling programs, if passed in some major cities, could serve as models for the rest of the nation.
"We believe New York is the tipping point," said Isaac Bazbaz, whose family owns Superbag, a major plastic bag supplier to Wal-Mart that has its headquarters and factory in northwest Houston.
Bazbaz has spent more than $1 million to start the Progressive Bag Alliance, in part because he believes the industry has gotten a bad rap.
"We have been good corporate citizens," he said. "We just don't understand why no one has taken the time to hear our story."
This issue seems to surface somewhere new every week. It's interesting to see the PBA take a leading role in this debate.
Steven Hentges, executive director of the polycarbonate/PBA unit of the plastics division of the American Plastics Council, will participate in an online chat about the safety of bisphenol A at noon Central Time today (1 p.m. Eastern, on Monday, Dec. 3) on the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's Web site.
The chat is part of the newspaper's Watchdog Report on chemical safety. The second part of the feature, specifically on BPA, ran on Sunday.
It will be interesting to see what sorts of questions Hentges gets from Journal Sentinel readers after they've read the newspaper's coverage.
Last week, the newpaper hosted an online chat with Frederick vom Saal, the University of Missouri professor whose research has focused attention on the safety of BPA.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel had a "watchdog report" in Sunday's paper about endocrine disrupting chemicals, with most of the emphasis on certain phthalates in PVC and on bisphenol A (BPA) in polycarbonate.
The story doesn't appear to break any new ground, but it's interesting that the mainstream media continues to follow this rather complicated issue. (USA Today had a similar feature on Nov. 2, which no doubt reached more readers, although the Journal Sentinel story is a better place to start for readers who want to know more about the topic).
OK, but you clicked through to this item for the "bizarre" part, right? Well, I wouldn't steer you wrong, dear reader. Check out the interactive chat with Dr. Frederick vom Saal, the University of Missouri biologist and expert on endocrine disrupters, that the Journal Sentinel posted on its Web site as part of the special report package. Nearly all of the questions are very serious, and indicate a high level of concern that many people have about how chemicals affect human health. But there are a couple of odd questions in the chat, and I enjoyed the way vom Saal dealt with them.
Los Angeles Times writer David Lazarus has an interesting story in today's "Consumer Confidential" column about how the city is dealing with the plastic bag issue. In light of the San Francisco plastic bag ban that took effect this week, Lazaraus talked to Los Angeles city councilman Ed Reyes about the city's effort to promote recycling of plastic bags, a strategy he is pushing rather than initiating a ban or a tax.
Lazarus asked Reyes, would a San Francisco-style ban work in Los Angeles?
"Maybe," Reyes said. "But first let's give what we have right now a chance. Los Angeles is not San Francisco. We are much bigger and much more diverse. We need to look at things that would be effective. ...
"We have to educate people," he said. "It's a process."
And if that doesn't work, Reyes said, then it'll be time to look at more aggressive approaches, such as what San Francisco is doing.
So I wonder, will plastic bag recycling work in Los Angeles? This is a very important question. With resin prices at high levels and large numbers of Californians (including the Governator) concerned about the environment, this is a great opportunity for bag makers, recyclers and retailers to prove that plastic bags can be part of a sustainable economy. It would appear that the stars are aligned in their favor.
But there's still a lot that can go wrong. Someone needs to recycle the bags, obviously, but there are rumblings of trouble in the plastic lumber industry right now, as manufacturers of recycled-content decks are competing with companies that are making similar products out of virgin resins. And perhaps the biggest risk of all is that consumers in Los Angeles just might not bother to recycle plastic bags in large enough numbers to make a difference. How much money should industry invest in trying convince the public to recycle? Is this a battle just for bag makers, or should the plastics industry as a whole try to get behind the effort?
Some provincial legislators in Alberta, Canada, must be very serious about boosting plastics recycling, because they've proposed putting a 10 cent deposit on milk containers. That's according to this story from the Calgary Sun newspaper's Web site.
The story says the province is suffering from "poor recycling rates," but the numbers cited are actually pretty decent: a 52 percent recycling rate for plastic jugs, 28 percent of cartons and 24 percent of juice boxes.
Also part of the proposed plan: doubling the province's existing nickel-per-container deposit to a dime.
"Above all, the committee recognized that primarily this is an environmental issue," Denis Ducharme, a member of the legislative assembly. "Throughout its deliberations the committee was focused on the goal of ensuring that the recycling program is convenient and effective for the Alberta public."
Milk jugs certainly have recycling value, and putting a deposit on them would probably make the recycling rate skyrocket. Still, putting a deposit on milk seems like a big step. If Alberta slaps a deposit on milk, will other communities follow?
The bottled water debate seems to be everywhere these days. Today it even made the daily comics. The "Judge Parker" strip, of all places, tackles the topic.
For those of you who aren't "Judge Parker" fans, the star of the strip is a lawyer (really), Sam Driver. In the Nov. 14 strip, Driver's know-it-all adopted daughter Sophie is telling her stepfather about the perils of bottled water. Yesterday, she told us that in 2006, Americans spent $15 billion on bottled water. Today, she continues: "...the real downside is the plastic container. It accounts for nearly two billion pounds of landfill every year."
When "Judge Parker" discovers the recycling problem that's posed by PET water bottles, I think it's safe to say this is way beyond being a mainstream issue. I don't think threats to ban PET water bottles are serious, but don't rule out more taxes.
Here's a cool looking new product, although I don't expect it to be a huge seller: a combination vinyl CD. It's a standard CD on one side, and a vinyl record on the flip side capable of holding up to 3.5 minutes of music.
The product is from Optimal Media Productions. It looks neat, but if I had one I'm afraid I couldn't do anything with the vinyl side. I threw out my turntable a few years ago. (Those old LPs are still hiding in the basement, though).
The Marks & Spencer retail chain in the United Kingdom is expanding its plan to charge customers 5 pence each (about 10 U.S. cents) for plastic bags.
The company will start charging for bags in southwest England in February. In the weeks before the move, it will give away free reusable bags to customers with each food purchase.
M&S started charging customers in Northern Ireland for bags, which has led to a 66 percent drop in the number of bags used by shoppers there.
"Our initial trial in Northern Ireland has shown us that introducing charging does make customers think twice about the number of bags they use, which is why we are extending our carrier bag charging trial to the South West of England," Chief Executive Officer Stuart Rose said in a news release. "If we see similar results and get an encouraging response from our customers in the South West, we plan to roll this out across the UK."
Ikea retail stores announced a similar plan in the United States back in February, but it doesn't have quite the same impact -- how many people buy things at Ikea that they carry out in plastic bags?
How soon will it be before a major U.S. retailer or grocery chain adopts a pay-for-bags policy like Marks & Spencer's?
Here's a story from Columbus, Ohio, that's probably relevant just about anywhere in the country. It's about a pilot project called the Boat Shrinkwrap Recycling Program that plans to collect and recycle all the shrink wrap that boat owners are using now to prepare their craft to deal with the harsh winter elements.
In Ohio, the program has collected 240 tons of boat wrap and greenhouse plastic in the past two years, which a local company, Mondo Polymer Technologies Inc., used to manufacture about 48,000 guardrail blocks.
This shrink wrap has a lot of value, and it's a shame to throw it away. If local marinas in your area plan to trash the wrap next year, please help put them in touch with a local recycler that will handle the material.
Another member of the Bush family is getting involved in a plastics-related issue. According to The New York Times' CityRoom blog, Lauren Bush, "a fashion model and niece of President Bush," has endorsed a New York City Council bill that would require supermarkets and retail stores to collect and recycle plastic carryout bags.
Ms. Bush, 23, appeared at the Whole Foods Market in the Lower East Side this morning with the City Council speaker, Christine C. Quinn, who supports the legislation, which was introduced last week by Councilman Peter F. Vallone Jr., a Queens Democrat. At a news conference, Ms. Bush, who graduated from Princeton last year, said her interest in plastic bags began about four years ago, when she learned about their impact on the environment. Ms. Bush told reporters:
"The average American uses between 300 and 700 bags a year. To give you a visual of that number, if everyone in the U.S. were to make a giant chain with their plastic bag, it would wrap around the earth 760 times. That’s just the American annual consumption of plastic bags. And on top of that, plastic bags don’t biodegrade. They only break down into tiny toxic little bits that pollute the soil and our waterways. This process is called photodegrade and it takes around 1,000 years for these bags to break down in our landfills. It is for these reasons that I support this legislation in City Council. I think it is important for New Yorkers to recycle plastic bags and buy reusable bags."
The blog goes on to say that Lauren Bush promoted something called the FEED Bag, a reusable cloth bag that costs $60 and enables the United Nations World Food Program to feed a child for one full school year. Bush is an honorary spokeswoman for the program.
With Laura Bush (once again) speaking out on plastics and marine debris last week, it's starting to feel like the White House should have a cabinet-level appointee to handle plastics issues.
First lady Laura Bush again addressed the topic of marine debris this week, in a speech at the J.L. Scott Marine Education Center’s Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, at the University of Southern Mississippi. It's obvious by now that marine debris is a pet issue of Laura Bush, and she's got strong feelings about the plastics part of the problem.
Here are some excerpts from her speech:
I've seen what humans can do and what our behavior can do to devastate marine life. Jim told you about -- Jim and Secretary Kempthorne and I got to visit Midway Island. Midway is the only inhabited island of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands that President Bush designated as a National Marine Monument. It's 140,000 square miles of National Marine Monument that he named. And when we were there -- we happened to be there at the very same times the Laysan Albatross were nesting. The Laysan Albatross is a tall bird. They nest on the ground because there are no natural predators of theirs at Midway where they nest. And so when we were there, we literally had to look where we walked or we would step on one of these funny little chicks, little Laysan Albatross chicks that were in their nest on the ground.
And they don't leave their nest because their parents do leave and fish on the oceans and then come back and feed them, and so they have to be where their parents left them, and they just instinctively stay in these nests.
We became very fond of these funny little birds that we watched, but we also saw the carcasses of a lot of these infant Laysan Albatross, because when their parents fish, they fish on the surface for squid, and that's where the plastic floats. And so they eat plastic and then feed their babies, regurgitate this plastic that they've eaten.
So we would see the little carcasses, and when we sort of looked in them, you would see cigarette lighters and toothbrushes and bottle caps and toys -- toy cars or little tires from toys -- and every single type of plastic that we all know we use every day.
And this is not from falling off of a boat. I mean, this isn't plastic that fell overboard, although certainly a lot of debris in the ocean is fishing gear that did fall from boats or was tossed from boats. But this could be a cigarette lighter somebody dropped in a curb, you know, on their street somewhere in the United States or anywhere in the world, and it slowly washed through the drains out into the oceans, and then finally ended up at these Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
So that reminded me, when I saw these little Laysan Albatross carcasses, baby carcasses, of how what we do here can affect every single part of our world, and why it's so important for us to make sure children know that. And that's one of the great things about what we just saw with these children inside. They were going through debris that somebody had picked up, marine debris. And of course, a lot of it was Styrofoam buoys, real marine debris that happens because of marine economy. But a lot of it were just things that people had dropped somewhere -- a lot of plastic, a lot of wrappers from -- plastic wrappers from paper, a lot of cans, a lot of beer cans. (Laughter.) That's what they got to go through.
But it really is very important that state and local governments and industry and academia and non-profit organizations and our federal institutions work together to make sure we reduce and remove debris in the marine environment.
And...
Thanks to each of you for your stewardship of our ocean and for making sure that their treasures can be enjoyed for every succeeding generation. In the meantime, I urge people here on the Gulf Coast and across our whole country to join these conservation efforts; volunteer for beach cleanup; get involved in public policy discussions about the sustainable, responsible development of our coast; reuse plastics; only buy plastics that are recyclable or reuse the ones that you've got. These efforts will preserve a cleaner, healthier ocean for everybody.
The American Chemistry Council is taking this issue seriously, and today we posted a story on our Web site about the association's new $2.5 million public education campaign aimed at California. It will be interesting to see how the rest of the plastics industry responds to this intitiative. Plastics trade associations to often have a tendency to work on their own. But this is a mainstream issue, and if ACC's effort fails, then we can expect more product bans in the industry's future.
Some plastics processors in Kenya plan to skip next week's K trade show in Dusseldorf, Germany, in part because of high taxes on plastics.
That's the story from Nairobi's Business Daily, according to this report from allAfrica.com.
Hit by hefty taxes and stringent production standards, several Kenyan plastic makers have pulled out of the world's biggest plastics and rubber fair, which begins in Dusseldorf ,Germany, on Wednesday.
They say even if they learn new plastic manufacturing technologies in Germany they can not implement them in Kenya because the cost of producing plastics has gone up by 120 per cent following the passing of the Finance Bill on Tuesday.
Not all the Kenyans are skipping the show. The story quotes Parit Shah, managing director of Silpack Industries Ltd., saying he will go to the show anyway, not only to see new technology but to learn more about how companies in other countries are dealing with environmental issues.
That sounds like a better way to deal with the threat. I hope he finds what he's looking for.
The high-level legal dispute between Dow Chemical Co. and former executive Romeo Kreinberg generated some more headlines today, with the news that Kreinberg filed a complaint on Oct. 12 suing J.P. Morgan for its alleged role in the dispute. The New York Times has a fascinating story about the development today, as well as a link to the latest court filing.
For those who don't remember, Dow fired Kreinberg in April, along with Pedro Reinhard, a senior advisor and member of the board of directors, accusing the pair of engaging in "business activity that was highly inappropriate and a clear violation of Dow’s Code of Business Conduct. Reinhard and Kreinberg were involved in unauthorized discussions with third parties about the potential acquisition of the Company."
A month later, Kreinberg and Reinhard turned around and sued Dow and CEO Andrew Liveris for $675 million.
The latest chapter in the saga is Kreinberg's suit against J.P. Morgan, which alleges that the investment bank deceived Dow about the attempt to sell the company.
According to the Times story:
Some time in late 2006, J.P. Morgan — without informing Mr. Liveris — got in contact with various investors, including the government of Oman and some private equity groups, to explore the possibility of a Dow deal. Reports about the talks kept popping up in the press, prompting Mr. Liveris to begin an aggressive search for their source.
When it emerged that J.P. Morgan was the financial adviser behind the rumored talks, Mr. Liveris called the bank out on the carpet.
What followed was a dinner — most likely a tense one — on April 9 in Midland, Mich., where Dow is based. It was attended by Mr. Liveris; Mr. Dimon; Christopher Iannaconne, a senior banker at J.P. Morgan; and Geoffrey Merszei, Dow’s chief financial officer.
The complaint described the dinner conversation this way:
Liveris made clear to Dimon and Iannacone that the company (or more precisely, Liveris personally) was out for “scalps.” Liveris indicated that the bank could curry favor by helping him implicate Kreinberg.
Within a few days, Mr. Kreinberg and Mr. Reinhard were fired.
I still can't believe this case hasn't been settled. Kreinberg's suit against J.P. Morgan is full of redacted details that surely will come out if this ever goes to trial. This is going to end up being embarrassing for some high-powered executives.
To put it in poker terms, it looks like Kreinberg just raised the stakes. Will Dow go all-in, or fold?
The Progressive Bag Alliance announced today that it supports Wal-Mart's decision to offer reusable bags in some stores.
The Chicago Tribunereported today that Wal-Mart will sell cloth bags with the slogan "Paper or Plastic? Neither." The bags will cost $1 each.
PBA points out that reusable bags aren't for everyone, although it supports offering that option to consumers. But it suggested a few other steps that retailers can make "to provide sustainable bag options."
At-Store Recycling: Plastic grocery bags are 100% recyclable and retailers need to provide bins at their stores where customers recycle plastic bags. This provides a resource for the customer and a revenue stream for the retailer, who can sell the valuable recycled plastic.
Bagger Training: Retailers must ensure that employees at the checkout have the proper training to ensure that each bag is used efficiently to reduce waste. PBA members have used bagger training programs to successfully reduce waste for large supermarket chains.
Recycling Measurement: Retailers that offer at-store recycling should also adopt a simple accurate system of measurement. This provides concrete metrics by which they can track the success of their program and identify best practices that can be shared with others to encourage similar action.
PBA should be commended for this reasonable reaction to Wal-Mart's announcement.
Our sister newspaper Advertising Age weighs in on "the backlash against plastic bottles" with a Page 1 story in today's edition, "Nestle, Pepsi and Coke Face Their Waterloo."
The "Waterloo," according to the story, is a slowing market for bottled water (growth of only 9 percent this year, compared to 16 percent in 2006). Consumers, according to the story, are participating in a growing environmental backlash against plastic containers. As proof, the report cites moves to discourage bottled water purchases by the cities of New York and San Francisco, as well as a large numbers of Google hits for searches like "stop using plastic water bottles" and "bottled-water waste."
"This could be pretty significant," said Joe Pawlak, VP of restaurant consultant Technomic. "People are being more socially conscious, whether it's global warming, sustainability or landfills. I think it's an offshoot of the boomers wanting to leave a positive legacy."
The story covers alternatives to PET bottles, including $20 refillable aluminum containers, and $10 polycarbonate bottles. It also cites efforts to make PET bottles lighter, and to incorporate recycled content into the containers.
There's nothing really new here. Rather, it looks like a story that's trying to tie together a variety of recent developments and give readers a big picture look at the issue.
Still, it's interesting to see what Ad Age thinks marketing professionals need to know about the bottle issue. And the fact that the newspaper put the story on Page 1 shows that the editors there consider it a major story.
University of Michigan researchers have developed a new plastic that sounds pretty amazing -- a composite plastic that they tout as being as strong as steel but lighter -- and transparent!
The material is made of layers of clay nanosheets and a water-soluble polymer. The molecular structure mimics a brick-and-mortar design found in seashells.
Engineering professor Nicholas Kotov almost dubbed it "plastic steel," but the new material isn't quite stretchy enough to earn that name. Nevertheless, he says its further development could lead to lighter, stronger armor for soldiers or police and their vehicles. It could also be used in microelectromechanical devices, microfluidics, biomedical sensors and valves and unmanned aircraft.
Kotov and other U-M faculty members are authors of a paper on this composite material, "Ultrastrong and Stiff Layered Polymer Nanocomposites," published in the Oct. 5 edition of Science.
The scientists solved a problem that has confounded engineers and scientists for decades: Individual nano-size building blocks such as nanotubes, nanosheets and nanorods are ultrastrong. But larger materials made out of bonded nano-size building blocks were comparatively weak. Until now.
"When you tried to build something you can hold in your arms, scientists had difficulties transferring the strength of individual nanosheets or nanotubes to the entire material," Kotov said. "We've demonstrated that one can achieve almost ideal transfer of stress between nanosheets and a polymer matrix."
The researchers created this new composite plastic with a machine they developed that builds materials one nanoscale layer after another.
The polymer used in the construction is polyvinyl alcohol. Picking the right material was important, because the polymer and clay form strong hydrogen bonds that Kotov calls "the Velcro effect," because if they are broken they reform easily in a new place.
Reed Conner Birdwell LLC is calling on Spartech Corp. to hire a financial adviser, a step that could lead to the sale of the company, according to this report from the Associated Press.
In a letter dated Sept. 27 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Reed Conner Birdwell LLC said it is distressed by a number of corporate matters and intends to "actively influence the board of directors through both private and public means."
According to the filing, Reed Conner beneficially owns 3.1 million shares, or a 9.8 percent stake in the Clayton, Mo.-based company, which makes plastic alloys and finished molded products.
Reed Conner said it has lost confidence in the board to maximize shareholder value, noting that the stock price has remained unchanged over the past 10 years and has underperformed peer groups indices.
Reed Conner also expressed displeasure over the drawn-out search for a chief executive, following CEO George Abd's resignation in July.
The letter also blasts Spartech's recent purchase of PET sheet extruder and thermoformer Creative Forming Inc. "It is both inexplicable and lacking in basic common sense to make a $60 million acquisition without a current CEO and in the midst of a search for a new CEO," the letter said.
The story likens Wang to Ross Perot. The comparison is interesting -- both are business executives who are political outsiders. Wang, like Perot, could play a spoiler role by mounting a third-party run for the presidency.
But Wang has some personal baggage -- his father, Wang Yung-ching, basically banished Winston to the United States after a scandal over a love affair in the mid-1990s. I don't know enough about politics in Taiwan to say whether the scandal makes his campaign a non-starter. But the China Post story deals with the scandal very casually -- "The cause for the alienation was Winston's extramarital affair with his former student Annie Lu" -- and perhaps voters in Taiwan are willing to look past personal indiscretions to elect a leader who can fix a failing economy.
Notice the similarities to the U.S. political climate?
Practically all the people in Taiwan have been fed up with the escalating political turmoil, resulting from the all but cut-throat strife between the ruling party, which is a minority in the Legislative Yuan, and the opposition.
Things are getting worse in Taiwan, with the stagnant economy seeing no light at the end of the tunnel. Unemployment has remained intolerably high. People have lost hope for the future. Many have committed suicide.
Worsening relations between both sides of the Taiwan Strait have hit the economy hard. Taiwan has no way to get out of its current -- and long -- economic doldrums.
All Winston Wang wants is to get into the saddle and get Taiwan's economy back to its former robust self.
"We have to increase our economic efficiency," Winston told the press yesterday. The current administration and the one that may follow can't do that, unless he himself heads it.
Wang believes improvement in cross-straits relations with China are essential to improving Taiwan's economy, a point that makes sense, but is sure to evoke strong feelings. Whether or not he wins, it would be interesting to have a president in Taiwan with plastics industry ties (including affliates in the United States that are major players in plastic resin, pipe and film).
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. today announced that by May, the company's U.S. stores only will sell concentrated products in the liquid laundry detergent category. The company says the change will save more than 400 million gallons of water, 125 million pounds of cardboard -- and 95 million pounds of plastic.
The move obviously saves a lot of shipping and handling costs too. Smaller bottles take less space, and less energy to transport. According to Wal-Mart's news release:
The technology to concentrate liquid detergent has been available for more than a decade, but was little used due to lack of interest in commercialization. Partnering closely with its suppliers, Wal-Mart made the decision to offer only concentrated detergent, and leading manufacturers began transforming their facilities to accommodate this request, leaving less capacity for old-fashioned detergents with high water content. This encouraged other retailers to move toward selling only the concentrated version of liquid detergents.
Bravo to Wal-Mart, this is a move that makes a lot of sense.
Maggie Joyce, a 10th grader in Brookline, Mass., wants people to use less polystyrene. Because her dad, Brian Joyce, happens to be a state senator in Massachusetts, Maggie Joyce got a chance to speak out on the topic in the state legislature yesterday, and to be featured in this story from the Quincy, Mass., Patriot Ledger.
The headline, "Senator’s daughter targeting Styrofoam," is what really caught my eye. According to the story, Maggie Joyce asked her father to propose a bill that would give towns across Massachusetts the option to ban polystyrene foam products.
Maggie, a tenth-grader at the Dexter School in Brookline, had been studying recycling with her class and became concerned after learning that polystyrene foam - known mainly by the trademarked Styrofoam - is made with petroleum.
‘‘This isn't so much about banning Styrofoam in the Commonwealth as it is about educating consumers about the detrimental impact of polystyrene on the environment, and asking individuals and corporations to seek alternative options,’’ Brian Joyce said.
Does this remind you of the late 1980s, when kids protesting and picketing McDonald's restaurants eventually convinced the company to drop the PS foam clamshell, even though the recplacement package was environmentally inferior?
Get ready for some national news coverage that will question the safety of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, the new aircraft that uses composites in a revolutionary lightweight design that will save fuel. Tonight, Dan Rather Reports, a weekly cable news program on HDNet, will interview aerospace designer Vince Weldon, who says the 787 "has major safety problems stemming from its design and use of reinforced plastics -- called composites -- that will make the plane unfit to withstand survivable crash landings."
Weldon describes how the composite fuselage will "shatter, not crumple" in a crash landing. He also says that the type of composites used for the exterior of the 787 makes passengers more vulnerable to toxic fumes in the event of fire. Weldon believes it will be very difficult for Boeing to make the 787 as safe as an aluminum plane and he adds that Boeing management repeatedly ignored his concerns and those of his colleagues about the plane's design.
Boeing, for its part, has been testing the 787 to make sure it is crashworthy and airworthy -- here's a link to a Boeing blog that goes into the testing program in some detail.
For more information on the Dan Rather Reports story, check this Web site. The Seattle Times also has a story today on Weldon's allegations. The story describes Weldon as a 46-year aerospace engineer veteran who worked for Boeing's Phantom Works research unit, who was "fired last year under disputed circumstances."
The plastics industry played a role in a historic event on Friday -- the first-ever U.S. trucker to haul a shipment across the U.S.-Mexico border.
According to this news release from the U.S. Department of Transportation, a truck from Stagecoach Cartage and Distribution in El Paso, Texas, crossed the border at 9 a.m. Sept. 14, hauling a load of plastic resin to Obregon, Mexico, which is near Hermosillo.
“Today is historic. We’re giving U.S. trucking companies the opportunity to compete in a new market that they have never before been allowed to penetrate,” said John H. Hill, FMCSA Administrator. “These opportunities will help reduce costs for American consumers and businesses while increasing trade efficiency at the border and maintaining safety on America’s highways.”
Thousands of Mexican commercial trucks operate every day in U.S. cities like San Diego and El Paso and last year made more than 4 million crossings into border commercial zones, which extend approximately 20-25 miles into the United States. U.S. commercial trucks, however, have never had the authority to operate in Mexico.
Transportes Olympic, a Mexican trucking company based in Nuevo Leon, earlier last week became the first Mexican carrier to operate beyond U.S. commercial border zones, as part of the demonstration project. The company delivered a load of steel to North Carolina, where it will be used to build a Baptist church.
Antec 2008 isn't going to happen until May 4-8 in Milwaukee, but the Society of Plastics Engineers already has two key speakers on its agenda. Ed Barlow, president of Creating the Future Inc., will speak on May 5 about “A Journey Through the 21st Century,” exploring the rapid and dramatic economic, technological, social and political changes that lie ahead, and defining the impact to each attendee and their organization.
“Change is a constant in the plastics industry, and it’s something that we all need to embrace,” says Susan Oderwald, executive director of SPE. “Mr. Barlow will provide valuable insight as to how attendees can define and seize opportunities and prepare for the underlying challenges.”
On May 6, William F. Banholzer, corporate vice president and chief technology officer of Dow Chemical Co., will speak about “The Challenges and Opportunities in Future Feedstocks for the Plastics Industry.”
Here's some more background about the speakers, courtesy of SPE:
Ed Barlow is president of Creating the Future Inc., and is dedicated to enhancing an understanding of the future and the influences which will affect personal, professional, organizational, and community settings. In addition to his extensive speaking and consulting schedule, he is interviewed regularly by the media. He has also testified before the U.S. Congress on several occasions, and his advice and counsel is sought regularly by leaders in business, government and the non-profit sector. Barlow’s professional experience includes executive positions in health care, business, higher education, and a Washington-based management-consulting firm. He holds a master's degree in management from the University of Notre Dame. Barlow’s client list represents the "Who's Who" within industry, government, and the not-for-profit sector, including: Abbott Laboratories, Hewlett-Packard, Kimberly-Clark, U.S. Navy, Lockheed Martin, and Pepsi.
William F. Banholzer is Corporate Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Dow Chemical Co., located in Midland, Mich. He is a member of the Dow’s management committee, chairs the company’s innovation committee, and leads Dow’s research and development activities across the globe. Prior to Dow, Dr. Banholzer had a 22-year career with General Electric Co., where he was vice president of Global Technology at GE Advanced Materials, responsible for worldwide technology and engineering. During his GE career, Dr. Banholzer was honored with GE’s Bronze, Silver, and Gold Patent Awards; GE Superabrasives’ Leadership Award; GE Plastics’ CEO Six Sigma Award; and election to the Whitney Gallery of Technical Achievers. In 2002, Dr. Banholzer was elected to the U.S. National Academy of Engineering, one of the highest distinctions that can be accorded an engineer. He also sits on the advisory boards for chemistry and chemical engineering at the University of Illinois and UC Berkeley, is a member of the American Chemical Society and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, and serves on the AIChE Awards Committee. Dr. Banholzer is a certified Six Sigma Master Black Belt, holds 14 U.S. patents, and has over 80 publications, which have received more than 1000 citations, for his work in the field of engineering and chemistry.
I'm looking forward to Antec next year, especially since it will be in one of my favorite cities. Since SPE is thinking this far advance about plenary speakers, I guess it's not too early for me to start to plan which restaurants I'd like to visit. For some suggestions, check out this list of the Milwaukee area's top 30 restaurants, from my former colleague at The Milwaukee Journal, the late, great Dennis Getto.
First lady Laura Bush is again speaking out on the marine debris issue, with a letter to the editor published in the Wall Street Journal yesterday. The letter has some pointed criticism of plastics, but I think it's safe to say that the Bush family isn't really anti-plastics, despite some of the things she wrote that might come across that way. Rather, I think readers should focus instead on what she has to say about marine debris, and take the criticism to heart. This is a very big issue, especially in California and Hawaii, which is something that people elsewhere in the country still might not realize.
Since the WSJ's Web site is restricted to subscribers only, I can't share a link, but I will share the letter itself. She wrote it in response to a WSJ commentary that ran on Aug. 8 about thousands of plastic bathtub toys that were lost overboard in 1992 and continue to wash up on shore in various places around the world:
Curtis Ebbesmeyer's commentary "Rubber Ducky Frenzy" (editorial page, Aug. 8) about the thousands of bathtub toys lost overboard in 1992 highlights the persistent problem of marine debris in our oceans and along our coastlines.
I witnessed the grim toll marine debris takes on wildlife during my visit to Midway Atoll in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands last March. These islands are home to over 70% of the world's Laysan Albatrosses. My visit coincided with the Albatross nesting season when the chicks are dependent solely on the adults for food. Adult Albatrosses fly far from these islands in search of food and in the process of fishing they mistake floating plastic for fish to feed their chicks. I saw firsthand the unfortunate result: carcasses of Albatross chicks which upon examination had fragments of plastic, including toys, cigarette lighters, toothbrushes and bottle caps, in their stomachs. Many Laysan Albatrosses die each year as a result of ingesting plastic, and research shows that increasing accumulation of debris also entangles seals and turtles on the islands.
Debris floating in the oceans and coastal waters enters from many sources: litter and illegal dumping on land, fishing gear lost at sea, and cargo lost overboard. Trash that is disposed of improperly along coastal areas is likely to wash out into the ocean. A significant portion of the waste consists of non-biodegradable plastic. The plastic may float in the ocean for years, entangle marine animals or be eaten by them, degrade habitats such as coral reefs, or end up on the shores in distant places -- like Midway Atoll.
In June 2006 President Bush established the world's largest fully-protected marine conservation area, the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. The monument designation ensures the protection of these islands, the coral reefs, the unique native species and cultural and historic resources. The monument is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the State of Hawaii. This partnership is working to restore the wildlife and habitat, remove marine debris from the coral reefs and islands, and promote greater public awareness of this unique part of the world.
People everywhere have a responsibility to be good stewards of our environment. The trash we throw away can have harmful consequences on wildlife and the environment far from home. President Bush joins me in encouraging all Americans to reduce the amount of plastic we use in our daily lives; re-use the plastic we already have; and buy items made of recycled materials and those that can be recycled. Our efforts will help ensure a cleaner and healthier environment for future generations.
Laura Bush
The White House
Washington
If Hillary Clinton had written a letter like this eight years ago, saying that she and Bill were encouraging Americans to use less plastic, do you think there would have been an outcry? I don't expect the same reaction from Bush's comments.
Anyway, this isn't the first time Laura Bush has commented on plastic marine debris. I blogged about this back in March, and noted at the time that this was proof that marine debris is not a fringe issue. Now, with a signed letter to the editor of the most prestigous business newspaper in the United States, she is once again stressing the importance of this message.
The Pittsfield, Mass., Berkshire Eagle newspaper is taking a friendlier tone toward Saudi Basic Industries Corp., now that the company has closed on its deal to buy GE Plastics. The newspaper's Web site today has a column by a former managing editor who compares Sabic to a fairy tale white knight, riding to the rescue of the company's local operations.
White knights are usually to be found in fairy tales.
But in this case, it's a reality. All indications point to a happy ending — and that's something that's sorely needed for a city and a county where doubts and skepticism persist among some people, despite impressive evidence that a new chapter of major economic expansion already is being written.
Remember back in March, when the Eagle had an editorial that said if Sabic bought GE Plastics, it "would likely be the worst case scenario" for the company? Talk about a huge turnaround!
Congratulations to BASF Corp., which recently donated $100,000 as part of its $500,000 pledge to Children's Specialized Hospital, the largest pediatric rehabilitation hospital in the country.
The company's gift will be used to build a gym for children recovering from serious accidents, illnesses and injuries who need to undergo therapy. The facility will be part of PSE&G Children's Specialized Hospital, a 60-bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital in Mountainside, N.J., that will open in December.
“The therapy gym is at the heart of this building,” says Philip Salerno III, president and chief development officer of the Children's Specialized Hospital Foundation, a non-profit group that supports the institution. “Because of the generosity of our partner BASF, children living at the hospital will have an extraordinary place to learn to walk, run, and move in a new way following a serious accident or illness.”
Can you tell the difference between a thermoplastic and a thermoset? Well, if you're reading this blog, I hope so. High school students probably cannot, but they can learn at the "Heating Plastics" online game, at the Nobel Foundation's Web site, Nobelprize.org.
The game, which is sponsored by Basell Polyolefins, features a talking plastic duck that teaches young people about how plastics are made, then gives them a quiz on polymer chemistry. The students judge (or perhaps guess) which materials are thermoplastic and which are thermoset. Each correct answer wins a "catalyst," and winners collect enough catalysts to produce their own virtual toy duck.
“We are proud to be a sponsor of an educational tool that highlights the significant contributions that plastics make every day to improving our quality of life,” said Massimo Covezzi, president of Basell Research and Development. “We are equally as proud of the fact that Basell predecessor company scientists Karl Ziegler and Giulio Natta shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1963 for their revolutionary work in the development of polyethylene and polypropylene polymerisation. Over 40 years later, we still produce catalysts that bear their names and that continue to produce high performance plastics which meet the needs of today’s consumers.”
I'm always skeptical of industry-sponsored intiatives designed to reach out to young people. They often seem less educational and more like propaganda. That's not the case here -- although I'm not sure how 14-year-olds will react to the talking duck narrator. (To be fair, it is presented pretty tongue-in-cheek).
I do have one minor criticism, and it relates to the game's introduction. When the duck takes players on a journey from the oil well through the plastics processing plant, the animated processing plant includes a couple of big smokestacks that belch some sort of big clouds. I guess that's supposed to indicate that it's a factory ... but in real life, it's rare to see a processing plant with a big polluting smokestack.
How do you design a toothbrush that prison inmates can't fashion into a shiv?
National Public Radio's Weekend Edition on Saturday had a fascinating interview with Paul Biermann, an engineer at Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory, who has done just that:
In prisons, almost anything can be fashioned into a weapon. Razor blades, toothbrushes, padlocks and even bucket handles have been used in U.S. prisons as lethal weapons.
While some prisons have replaced toothbrushes with three-inch versions that slide onto a fingertip, others stick with more traditional, cost-efficient products.
Paul Biermann, an inventor at Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory, thinks that altering the molecular properties of everyday toiletries can make them functional, normal-size — and harmless.
At his lab in Laurel, Md., Biermann and a team of engineers have been working on a toothbrush that can't be filed down or melted. After rejecting several designs — including a toothbrush with a hollow handle filled with plastic balls — the team invented a system using polyurethane, reinforced with a tightly wound paper product that by itself is not usable as a weapon if removed.
Biermann's design is clever, and the story is a great reminder of the role that universities can play in helping manufacturers tackle difficult problems.
When you think of plastics, do you think of an industry in the "last dying throes...on its way out"? Because that's what Fairfax, Calif., Councilman Lew Tremaine told the Marin Independent Journal, in a story on the newspaper's Web site.
The angle? Fairfax leaders intend to fight a lawsuit that would challenge the town's ban on plastic grocery bags.
Tremaine appears to be an extremely quotable guy. Here are a few more of his comments from the story:
"For us to cave into a whining plastics industry is not what we should do," Tremaine said. "We should stand up to these guys. These are the last dying throes of an industry on its way out."
"Common sense tells you that this [banning plastic bags] is good for the environment. This [lawsuit] is a ploy, and I'm not in any mood to buy into it."
"It's [recycling plastics bags] a nice thought, except that crap can't be recycled," Tremaine said. "It's the same argument that was made against the polystyrene ban all over again. The industry claimed that product was recyclable, but it wasn't. They warehoused it because they couldn't do anything with it. And it's the same with plastic bags. By the time you get it down to that thin film, the plastic is used up. It's done. There's no market for it."
Something tells me he's not in a mood for compromise. Do you think he has aspirations for a higher public office? Just don't try to confuse him with any facts.
Do you like Dow Chemical Co.'s corporate image ads -- the ones that feature the "Human element"?
Rance Crain, president of Crain Communications Inc. (the parent company of Plastics News) likes them a lot. He wrote about the ads in a column for our sister newspaper Advertising Age, and it also ran in BtoB, another sister publication.
The TV spots and print ads are written by DraftFCB's John Claxton (who also does the voice-over). They are powerful, even lyrical in tone—for my money, the best corporate campaign today. Listen to this: "For each of us, there is a moment of discovery. We turn a page. We raise a hand. And just then, in the flash of a synapse, we learn that life is elemental." (How many ads would dare use the word "synapse"?) It goes on: "And in the dazzling brilliance of this knowledge, we may overlook the element not listed on the chart—its importance so obvious its presence is simply understood. The missing element is the human element. And when we add it to the equation, the chemistry changes. ... The human element. Nothing is more fundamental, nothing more elemental."
Dow allocated "upward of $25 million" for the corporate ads, according to the column, "on top of the $5 million it normally spends on general advertising."
Patti Temple Rocks, a Dow vice president, said the ads have helped the company counter the chemical industry's negative image -- and even helped Dow recruit new employees.
Obviously these ads are aimed at a much wider audience than the plastics industry. But readers of this blog pay closer attention than most folks when they see a TV ad from a company like Dow Chemical. What do you think of Dow's "Human Element" campaign? Is the company's $25 million well spent?
Let's take a break from all the attacks on plastics and share a nice success story: Pubs and nightclubs around the world are gradually switching from glass bottles and cups to plastic, and the trend is saving a lot of patrons from serious injury.
The latest news comes from the Penticton, British Columbia, Western News, which reports today that four bars switched to plastic containers last week, and they were very pleased with the results.
“For us it was great,” said David Prystay, general manager of the Penticton Lakeside Resort and Casino, whose Barking Parrot Bar made the switch over the long weekend.
The Element Nite Club, Blue Mule and Nite Moves also agreed to make the change under the suggestion of Penticton RCMP and the B.C. Liquor Board inspector Susan McClean.
“Last year there were some issue with bottles,” she said of various fights where beer bottles were used as weapons and another incident where a women cut her foot in the bar after stepping on broken glass.
It might seem trivial, but glass containers and pubs can be a deadly combination. In addition to accidental cuts, there's a serious problem called glassing, defined as "an extremely violent attack, involving the use of a glass as an offensive weapon. Glassing attacks are most often carried out at bars or pubs where alcohol is being served, and hence a drinking glass is readily available to be used as an offensive weapon."
According to one news report cited by Wikipedia, there are more than 5,000 glassing incidents each year in the United Kingdom alone.
Sure, there's something about drinking from a plastic cup that reminds me of being at a college frat party. But I still think this is a good idea.
And I hope that taverns that make the switch are recycling all those empty plastic cups and bottles.
Online newsmagazine Salon.com has a feature today about plastic bags, and it's not pretty. It starts with the headline "Plastic bags are killing us," and goes on to call them "an environmental scourge like no other, sapping the life out of our oceans and thwarting our attempts to recycle it."
And that's just the introductory paragraph.
The author, Katharine Mieszkowski, covers the issues very thoroughly. Bag bans have been a front-burner issue for the plastics industry for a couple of years, although the industry is just beginning to react to the challenge.
There's nothing in the Salon story that's going to be new to Plastics News readers -- many of Mieszkowski's sources are the same people we've been quoting about bag bans and marine debris. But it's still interesting to see the story though a different perspective, especially how she deals with some of the industry arguments about plastic bags being recyclable, and how they save energy compared to alternatives.
The story covers all sides of the debate, even though the headline is a great example of hyperbole.
Here's another prominent point that is worth debating. The story quotes Carol Misseldine, sustainability coordinator for the city of Oakland, saying that recycling plastic bags into composite decking is not an example of true recycling. "We're not recycling plastic bags into plastic bags," she says. "They're being downcycled, meaning that they're being put into another product that itself can never be recycled."
First, I don't think there's anything wrong with recycling a disposable product into a durable application. Second, I don't think you can say that composite decking "can never be recycled." And, finally, it's an exaggeration to say that we're "not recycling plastic bags into plastic bags," because some people are doing just that.
The New York Times today editorialized on the topic of plastics recycling. The bottom line: the newspaper supports expanded bottle deposit laws.
The column starts with the hot-button issue of bottled water, arguing that "it is time to start thinking twice about drinking commercially bottled water." It cites the energy needed to manufacture and transport plastic bottles as an important reason. Plastic water bottles contribute to global warming and create a "huge recycling problem," the paper reports.
Of the mountain of individual plastic water bottles created by Americans each year — including enough to hold more than seven billion gallons of water — less than one-fourth are sent to the recycling industry for a second round.
That makes absolutely no sense for the environment or for the economy.
The newspaper laments that only three states — California, Hawaii and Maine — put deposits on water bottles. "Passing new bottle laws or expanding old laws to include plastic bottles should be an easy call for most Legislatures. But the grocery and drink industry have been able to use their clout, and campaign funds, to keep that from happening. That needs to change."
I'm happy to see the editorial writer places the blame where it belongs. Many people in the plastics industry quietly support bottle deposits. But opposition from their customers -- grocers and soft drink companies -- has made it nearly impossible for state legislatures to pass new bottle bills.
Plastics News has editorially supported expanding deposit programs to more kinds of plastic bottles since 1997 -- and we've supported a national bottle bill even longer. It's a stance that hasn't been unanimously supported by all of our readers, but I think time has shown that it is the right position. Perhaps now that the NY Times has joined our bandwagon the march will pick up speed.
The bottled-water industry is battling back from a variety of attacks in the past few weeks with a new advertising campaign. Today the International Bottled Water Association took out full-page advertisements in The New York Times and The San Francisco Chronicle titled "It's Healthy to Think About Water."
Here's an excerpt:
Diabetes. Obesity. Heart disease. America’s declining health is in the headlines every day. At a time when one of the greatest challenges facing this country is the health of its people, it’s time to think about water. Calorie-free, refreshing water. Whether it comes from a faucet or a bottle, drinking water is an easy step people can take to lead a healthier lifestyle.
When we drink any beverage, it’s likely to come out of a bottle or a can. In fact, 70% of all beverages consumed are from a container. That’s a result of our 24/7, on-the-go society. So, as far as we’re concerned, the drink in everyone’s purse, backpack and lunch box should be water.
Bottled water is always there when you need it. During emergencies, such as earthquakes, floods, fires, tornados or hurricanes, the bottled water industry has provided millions of bottles of water to people and communities in need.
As more people choose to drink water, we must continue to protect and preserve the environment. The bottles our member companies produce are 100% recyclable. We use lightweight plastic bottles and the bigger containers found on bottled water coolers in many homes and offices represent the largest reusable bottle business in America.
Why advertising? IBWA President and CEO Joseph K. Doss said: "The bottled water industry has a right and responsibility to help ensure that consumers are not swayed from making bottled water--a healthy, safe, and convenient product -- their beverage of choice."
The key, though, is that bottled water has been under attack. As Newsweek recently reported:
It’s been a tough summer for the bottled-water industry. In June, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, led by San Francisco’s Gavin Newsom, passed a resolution calling for a study of the negative environmental impact of bottled water and praising the high quality of municipal tap water. In July, under pressure from environmental activists, Pepsico announced it would begin adding “source labels” to bottles of Aquafina, making it clearer to consumers that the stuff inside is merely tap water that’s been subjected to extra purification. And in the July issue of Fast Company magazine, award-winning writer Charles Fishman penned a highly critical story about Americans’ $16 billion-a-year bottled-water habit, which he calls an “indulgence” in a world in which 1 billion people lack access to dependable water sources. “When a whole industry grows up around supplying us with something we don't need—when a whole industry is built on the packaging and the presentation—it's worth asking how that happened, and what the impact is,” Fishman writes.
I understand critics' points about wastefulness of buying bottled water in the United States, where tap water is widely available and safe to drink. But, as a parent, I'd rather have my kids drinking bottled water than soda when they're on the go, so we usually have a case of the stuff in the house.
I don't think the bottled water industry is at risk of disappearing. Mayors and city councils can make speeches condemning it. But if they try to ban or tax it, I think they'd have a tea party on their hands.
Charlene Begley was the "odd woman out" when General Electric Co. announced it would sell GE Plastics to Saudi Basic Industries Corp. She was president and CEO of the Pittsfield, Mass.-based unit for almost two years. But when the deal was announced, GE said Begley would move on to a new role, and she would be replaced by Brian Gladden.
Today, we learn what that "new role" will be. GE announced that Begley has been named president and CEO of GE Enterprise Solutions, "a new business that is focused on helping GE’s global customers increase their productivity through superior information management and automation solutions." The unit will have annual sales of $11.5 billion.
Everyone I talk to in the industry thinks Begley left the plastics business because there wouldn't be much of a future for a female executive at Sabic. That makes sense -- but if it's not true, I think Sabic should say so soon after the deal closes. GE Plastics is a global company, and regardless of the cultural norms in Saudi Arabia, it would be poor form for them to alienate thousands of female executives at plastics companies around the world.
Back in 2005, when Newell Rubbermaid Inc. told us that it was "strategically exiting" resin-intensive categories and "looking very aggressively" at alternatives to plastics, it seemed too radical to believe. But there's new proof that it's pursuing the strategy today, with the news that Rubbermaid Commercial Products has purchased United Metal Receptacle Corp., a manufacturer of metal trash cans.
Today's story, from the Winchester Star in Virginia, says Rubbermaid made the deal in June. United Metal is based in Pottsville, Pa., and employs 150. It eventually will change its name to Rubbermaid.
Joe DeZarn, director of marketing communications, said United Metal's products complement Rubbermaid waste containers. "It’s really a nice fit for us because the products we manufacture and the products they manufacture are sold to the same customer," said Joe DeZarn, director of marketing communications at Rubbermaid Commercial Products.
Covering Rubbermaid's manufacturing strategy has been a bit difficult over the past decade, as the company sometimes has announced plans to expand a plant, then turned around and closed it instead. But perhaps the tumult is over now, and Rubbermaid has settled on a consistent path.
Are you tired of the "I am not a plastic bag" story? You know, the designer bag that has drawn crowds everywhere it's introduced, and has sometimes sold for a premium on eBay?
Here's some info from the eBay post about the "I am a plastic bag...":
Seeking authentic in a knock-off world? Facts not fashion? Then don’t miss out on this 100% recyclable and reusable plastic bag. That’s right! Looking for a practical solution to a greener globe? This is the real deal…
Plastic bags are a practical alternative at the checkout stand, but what people don’t know is that most plastic bags are 100% recyclable. The Progressive Bag Alliance is making this limited edition plastic bag available to help spread the word.
Here are a few things you should know:
Myth: Plastic bags are single use
Fact: Plastic bags are 100% recyclable and reusable. Recycled plastic bags are already being made into new consumer products including new plastic bags and outdoor decking products.
Many grocery stores will take back your plastic bags for recycling – check with your local grocer.
Myth: Paper grocery bags are a better environmental choice than plastic bags.
Fact: Plastic bags use 40% less energy to produce and generate 70% less emissions & 80% less solid waste than paper. (U.S. EPA website, www.epa.gov/region1/communities/shopbags.html)
Myth: Plastic grocery bags take 1,000 years to decompose in landfills.
Fact: Today’s landfills are designed to prevent decomposition of anything. Chances are your orange peel, milk carton and even last year’s newspaper won’t breakdown.
Research by William Rathje, who runs the Garbage Project, has shown that when excavated from a landfill, newspapers from the 1960s can be intact and readable.
Myth: Compostable bags can degrade in backyard composts.
Fact: In order to breakdown, compostable bags must be sent to an industrial composting facility. Burying them in your backyard, leaving them out in the open or sending them to the neighborhood municipal composting center won’t work. The limited number of these facilities functioning in the U.S. significantly reduces the viability of compostable bags as an alternative.
And finally, my favorte part: "(Please note, this is a real auction and the winning bidder will receive the item indicated.)"
According to the eBay post, there was one bidder for the "I am a plastic bag," and the winning bid was 1 cent (plus 41 cents for shipping.)
Tucked away in Coca-Cola Co.'s annual environmental report (released yesterday) is an interesting snippet of news on the company's PET recycling efforts:
The Coca-Cola system also continued to invest in closed loop recycling plants. In 2006, Coca-Cola Beverages Austria finalized a €15 million investment partnership to build the country’s first bottle-to-bottle recycling plant. The plant, which will begin operations in 2007, will have capacity to provide 6,000 tons of recycled PET plastic material for use in new bottles.
This will be an interesting development to watch. Coke is under a lot of pressure right now, especially on the bottled water side of the business, to do something to improve its environmental reputation. If this project in Austria is a commercial success, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried similar projects around the world.
National Public Radio had a pretty good report this morning on plastic bottle recycling. The story doesn't cover much new ground, but it's worth a listen because it's balanced, and because it's an indication that there's pressure building to put deposits on more plastic bottles -- not just PET soda containers.
What do I mean by balanced? Well, the report quotes a small grocer who is opposed to bottle deposits, which I think is pretty rare in a typical recycling story.
"It's somewhat dirty, it's inconvenient and it actually costs us money," says Ken Capano, who owns two ShopRite stores in Connecticut.
Capano says the deposit law in his state places too much of the burden of recycling on grocers, who have to provide space and machines to take the bottles back. It costs each of his stores about $20,000 a year, he says.
Also consider this somewhat radical idea proposed by a water company executive:
Kim Jeffrey, president and CEO of Nestle Waters North America, says he's not against container deposits, but he says beverages should not be the only containers targeted.
"Everybody that sells a plastic container that's recyclable should have some deposit on it if we're going to do this thing the right way," Jeffrey says.
And he means everybody.
"If it's P&G with a detergent container; if it's ConAgra with a peanut butter container; or if it's me with a bottled water container; or if it's a dairy with a one-gallon milk container — this should be a level playing field on this," Jeffrey says.
Bottle deposit legislation was introduced in several states this year, but it didn't seem to catch fire. That's too bad -- I think deposits are the most effective way to boost the plastics industry's lackluster recycling rate. And remember, there's real demand for recycled PET containers. But politicians seem more interested in plastic bag bans right now, and deposits are stuck on the public policy back burner.
Here's an interesting Associated Press story about how many plastic milk crates get stolen each year -- both for college kids' dorm furniture and to be recycled. Some of the numbers related to the plastics recycling angle look spurious, so I suggest taking them with a grain of salt.
The story says U.S. dairies lose about $80 million annually to milk crate theft, and that one company in California has hired a private detective to track down lost crates. The story's sources blame the problem on recyclers in China.
"We saw them disappearing into this black hole," said Rachel Kaldor, executive director of the Dairy Institute, a trade group in Sacramento. "We just don't know who's stealing these crates off the loading docks."
Here's the first part that doesn't make sense. The story says consumers pay as much as $10 for crates at places like the Container Store. Yet the dairies think most of the crates end up at recyclers who pay only pennies per pound.
"If it were just college kids taking them, the dormitories would be overflowing with milk cases," said Stephen Schaffer, general manager of Alta Dena Dairy near Los Angeles.
That doesn't seem right. If you could sell a crate for $10, why would you sell it for a buck or two to a recycler?
The California dairy industry is so convinced that recyclers are the problem that it lobbied the state legislature to pass a law that allows dairies to sue recyclers accused of accepting stolen crates. Yet, so far, no cases have been filed.
After the law went into effect last January, the Dairy Institute hired private investigator Chuck Wall to educate recyclers about documenting purchases and to conduct sting operations against suspected offenders.
Wall said he helped recover 24,000 pounds of ground-up plastic from crates belonging to dairies, bakeries and beverage companies at one recycler -- but the story says that's "at least a quarter-million dollars of plastics." That's either a typo or a gross exaggeration. I think 24,000 pounds of HDPE regrind is worth, at most $18,000 -- probably much, much less.
Anyway, if you know someone who has stolen milk crate furniture in their apartment, you can turn them in to the Alta Dena Dairy's "milk crate abuse" hotline, at (800) 457-6688. Operators are standing by...
Friday, July 13, officially was the plastics industry's 100th birthday -- that's the day that Leo Baekeland patented Bakelite. We're up to our elbows in plastics industry history this week, preparing our Aug. 6 special report, "Celebrating a Century of Plastics." Our staff is having fun with the project.
To whet your appetite, here's an interesting interview with Jeffrey L. Meikle, a professor of American studies and art history at the University of Texas, and the author of "American Plastic: A Cultural History." National Public Radio's Michelle Norris is the interviewer, and they touch on a wide range of topics in a bit less than 8 minutes.
Here's a highlight: Norris gives a list of environmental concerns related to plastics and asks whether the continued use of plastic makes sense. Meikle's reply: "Actually, I think it does make sense. One of the things about plastic is that has always been a democratizing material. It has made it possible to manufacture more cheaply things that otherwise would be too expensive for millions of people to have."
Meikle isn't a cheerleader for the industry -- but he does touch on some interesting advantages of plastics that seem to get lost in modern debates about controversial issues like product bans, and the industry's sustainability.
Pittsburg State University in Pittsburg, Kan., is offering a new "Plastic is Fantastic" camp for kids this week, according to this feature in the Pittsburg Morning Sun.
Paul Herring, Plastic is Fantastic camp instructor, said the camp is intended to combine fun and math to create a hands-on learning experience.
"We want to give them an understanding of how math and science are used in technology," Herring said. "We have had the kids use their math skills to help us calculate material usage and prices. We have also had them on the computers and we've used the rapid prototyping machine in the lab. So they have been able to experience a lot of different things."
On Wednesday, the students were in the computer lab creating computer-generated car designs that they will use to make a mold form and a plastic car.
This is the first year for the camp, which costs $90 per child, according to the university's Web site. Herring told the newspaper that the camp had a good turn-out for the first year, and he hopes to continue the program in the future. "This is just another opportunity for kids to become interested in science and learn how math and science are used to create everyday things," Herring said.
Who knows, maybe the camp will encourage a future Stan Gault or Jon Huntsman to enter the plastics industry.
Do any other schools offer plastics-related camps? Do you wish you could have gone to plastics camp when you were a kid?
Everywhere they're introduced, the "I'm not a plastic bag" reusable shopping bags are causing a stir. It's kind of like Beanie Babies and Harry Potter ... the frenzy feeds upon itself. And the opportunity to make money by selling them for a big profit on eBay certainly helps.
The newest stories are from New York, where Whole Foods retailers offered a limited supply of the bags today. They actually had crowds waiting to buy them, and sold out of the $15 designer totes in minutes.
This CNN story says the bags are selling for $200 to $250 each on the Web.
Certainly no Plastics News readers were among those standing in line for an "I'm not a plastic bag," were there?
Every once in a while I'll see a plastics-related technology story that seems so amazing that it's almost hard to believe. That's the case with this Science Daily story on tiny self-propelled polystyrene balls that can navigate narrow channels -- like a human blood stream.
Researchers coated one side of each PS ball with a thin layer of platinum, then dropped them into a solution of hydrogen peroxide and water.
This metal catalyzes a reaction in which hydrogen peroxide breaks into oxygen and water. Because the reaction spits out three molecules for every two that it consumes, the polystyrene ball is pushed from the platinum side.
Objects as small as these polystyrene balls naturally wander about randomly, a phenomenon caused by jostling about among vibrating atoms and molecules. This "random walk" movement is called Brownian motion. To account for it, the platinum-coated balls were tested against polystyrene balls with no coating.
Over short distances, they found that the half-coated balls moved in a particular direction although their paths meandered over longer distances. Still, the wanderings of the coated balls were distinct from the Brownian motion of the uncoated balls. Their paths were a random walk with step sizes that depended on the concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The larger the hydrogen peroxide concentration, the larger the step.
They don't seem to have an application for this phenomenon yet, but with all the research into nanotechnology, I can imagine that these jet-propelled little balls could have an interesting future.
BASF AG is ready to entertain bidders for a big part of its styrenics business. The company announced this morning that it has an offer to buy its styrene monomer, polystyrene, ABS and styrene butadiene copolymer units. As a result, the company plans to "start discussions with the interested party" -- which was unnamed.
The unit has plants in Antwerp, Belgium; Altamira, Mexico; São José dos Campos, Brazil; Ulsan, South Korea; and Dahej, India. It posted sales of about €3.2 billion in 2006 and has about 1,000 employees.
“Earnings in our styrenics activities have improved considerably thanks to efficiency optimization measures and fine-tuning of business models. However, further repositioning steps are necessary to meet appropriate levels of profitability,” said Dr. John Feldmann, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, responsible for the Plastics as well as Oil & Gas segments. “We will now begin talks to examine this initial offer as well as consider other options to see if these activities can realize additional potential in their highly competitive markets as part of the portfolio of a company experienced in the global commodities sector.”
Hans W. Reiners, President of BASF’s Styrenics division, said that BASF’s remaining styrenics activities will in the future focus on foams and specialties for the construction, automobile, packaging, sport and leisure industries. “This ties in with the strategy of BASF’s Plastics segment to supply its customers with highly innovative, tailor-made solutions.”
Despite all the consolidation going on the the styrenics market right now, this development caught me a bit by surprise -- mainly because the company just two weeks ago made a point of announcing that its plastics business was not for sale.
And some people wonder why news reporters are skeptical.
The biggest surprise I saw in my news searches this morning was a release from Spartech Corp. announcing that George Abd was leaving the company, citing "personal reasons." Abd was president, chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors. The resignation is effective immediately.
Randy Martin, the company's chief financial officer, was named interim president and CEO.
The company followed that up with an announcement updating its earnings guidance for the current fiscal year:
Spartech Chief Financial Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, Randy C. Martin, stated, "We indicated in our second quarter earnings release that our outlook for the rest of 2007 included an anticipation for a weaker overall demand environment, substantial weakness in the transportation and residential construction markets, and challenging comparisons to the prior year third quarter. We believe that in light of the other communication occurring today, it is appropriate to update our outlook and related guidance for the year."
Mr. Martin added, "Our fiscal 2007 volumes sold through the month of June continued to be negatively impacted by a challenging demand environment particularly from weakness in the transportation and residential construction markets, which combined with strong volumes in the first portion of our prior year third quarter, has resulted in a difficult comparison for sales volume in our third quarter to date of this year. Our sales volume for the first two months of our fiscal third quarter is down 7% from the prior year comparative period. In addition, our third quarter earnings to date have been adversely impacted from foreign currency losses due to the continued weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. Based upon this start to our third quarter, we are refining our estimated range for fiscal 2007 diluted earnings per share to $1.45 to $1.50, from our previous guidance of $1.55 to $1.62 per share. This revision considers our change in estimate for our third quarter performance. This guidance does not include the impact of entering into a separation agreement with our former Chief Executive Officer announced earlier today. The impact of the terms of the severance agreement on fiscal 2007 diluted earnings per share will be approximately four cents and will be included in special items."
Most investors didn't like the news: Spartech's shares dropped nearly $5, or about 18.3 percent, in trading today, to close at $22.33 per share.
I hesitate to say this is the final word, but it looks like Huntsman Corp. officially has a buyer, and it's not Basell Holding BV.
Huntsman and Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. announced today that they have agreed to a definitive merger agreement. The total value of the deal is $10.6 billion, including assumed debt.
Huntsman also announced that it has terminated its previously announced merger agreement with Basell. Basell will receive a $200 million break-up fee, to be paid in a 50:50 split by Huntsman and Hexion.
Hexion may not be a household name in the plastics industry yet, but it should be. The Columbus, Ohio, company is the world's largest maker of thermoset plastics. It was created via the 2005 merger of Borden, Bakelite AG, Resolution Performance Products and Resolution Specialty Materials. Hexion is controlled by private equity firm Apollo Management LP.
Huntsman is a household name, but perhaps not for much longer. The Salt Lake City-based company makes polyurethanes and speciality materials.
Cereplast Inc. had pretty big plans to feature its bio-based renewable plastics at the Live Earth Rio de Janeiro concert on July 7. But things didn't work out.
The Hawthorne, Calif.-based company sent out a news alert late today explaining the problem:
As a follow up to the press release sent to you on Tuesday, July 3rd, the Cereplast products -- 27,000 cups, 10,000 forks and 10,000 spoons -- made from biodegradable and compostable bio-based plastic resin were shipped to the Live Earth Concert in Rio de Janeiro, but unfortunately were not able to be used. Cereplast fulfilled the Live Earth order but shipping logistics prevented the products from arriving at the concert venue on-time.
Oops. I actually was going to blog on the company's participation in the event before I found out that things didn't work out, so I don't feel too bad about mentioning the problem. Cereplast puts out a lot of news releases -- it is one of the few companies I've seen that puts out a news release when a trade newspaper or magazine mentions them in a story.
But I have to take my hat off to them for this one.
On the processing side, according to Cereplast's earlier release, Glens Falls, N.Y.-based GenPak LLC supplied the cups for the concert.
Blogs are still pretty rare in the plastics industry, so let me direct you to another that I just discovered: Shawn Chambers, an executive at Warehoused Plastic Sales Inc. in Toronto, has started "The Plastic Spork," a blog devoted to plastics sheet, rod, tube and film distribution.
Shawn started posting comments on June 27, and he's already up to nine entries. He's got some interesting first-person stories, including "How not to apply for a sales job in plastic," and "What makes plastic distribution an interesting career."
Welcome to blogland, Shawn. And thanks to Mel Ettenson at "Global Plastics Letter" for making me aware of The Spork.
According to a story from the Fitchburg, Mass., Sentinel & Enterprise, one of the lawsuits related to the failure of compounder Gitto Global Corp. will go to trial in U.S. District Court on Sept. 10. A criminal investigation is still underway, according to the report.
Gitto Global filed for bankruptcy in September 2004, and it's taking quite a while for the whole mess to unravel. The former owners were alleged to have overstated sales for several years, and referred to the room where allegedly phony invoices were prepared as "The Secret Garden."
The Fitchburg newspaper deserves credit for staying on top of the case. Bankruptcy cases -- even interesting one like Gitto's -- can be tough to understand, and Gitto wasn't a huge company or a household name. But the Sentinel & Enterprise has been following every step of the process, and it even has an interesting special report on Gitto on its Web page, appropriately titled "The Secret Garden."
I'm always cautious about companies that claim to be the first to do something -- most of the claims are just about impossible to verify. But here's an interesting "first" plastics application, courtesy of BASF Corp.'s Web site: stirrup inserts made from an ABS/nylon blend by an injection molder in Belgium.
This marks the first time that this plastic has gone into such an application, where primarily leather or metal had been used up to now. The lightweight, easy-to-install parts prevent the rider’s foot from slipping through the stirrup when the horse is galloping. It really helps children to learn not to put their feet too far into the stirrups. Plastics in these safety-relevant parts for horse-riding have an edge over conventional materials: they are easier to maintain, more dimensionally stable and cheaper.
Polymar bvba is the company credited with marketing the product, and A. Schulman helped develop the stirrup, according to the release.
I doubt that stirrups are a high-volume market, but it's a neat niche that I never would have imagined. I guess this is proof that there are still applications out there for plastics to replace metal and other traditional materials.
We get calls all the time from people who want data on various resins -- how much is produced? How much is used in specific applications? How are the numbers changing from year to year? We refer the callers to the American Chemistry Council, which writes the book on resin statistics.
Well, if you're one of those readers who wants resin data, there's good news: the 2007 data is available. ACC announced on June 19 that its reference book "The Resin Review: The Annual Statistical Report of the U.S. Plastics Industry," is finished. The report is compiled annually from data collected by ACC's Plastics Industry Producers' Statistics Group and other sources.
The 2007 edition contains detailed tables on U.S. resin production, sales and captive (internal) use by end-use application, industry capacities and utilization rate data from 1996-2006. Sales data is broken down into various end-use markets from 1996-2006 for more than a dozen individual resins. A table with historical data on U.S. plastics production and sales and captive use tracks the trend from 1973 to 2006.
The publication also explains the basic chemistry of plastics and includes material flow diagrams and monomer derivatives diagrams. It provides a glossary of basic plastics terms and details the history of plastics development and current applications.
Sound like something you need? A PDF download of the report costs $200 (that's a handy format for searching), and an old-fashioned hard copy costs $250, plus shipping and handling. You can order it online at www.resinreview.com.
The head of a Canadian government team studying the safety of bisphenol A has been reassigned, according to Toronto's Globe & Mail. Health Canada is investigating claims that Mark Richardson, manager of its contaminated-sites division, was biased in favor of the chemical.
According to the story, Richardson got into trouble because of some remarks he made at a medical conference.
He indicated at the conference that he personally didn't think bisphenol A presented a danger, extolled the virtues of its use in dentistry and dismissed possible health threats posed by exposures to the substance, comparing it to eating tofu.
The Globe and Mail raised questions about Dr. Richardson's objectivity yesterday morning with Health Canada. Shortly afterward, Health Minister Tony Clement's office asked for an investigation into Dr. Richardson's remarks and suitability to work on the review. The investigation will be conducted by the department's chief scientist, Wendy Sexsmith.
The story goes on to say that some scientists are concerned about the safety of tofu, too -- something I didn't know.
"Tofu, and many products from plants, contain estrogen-like chemicals and there is scientific uncertainty about their possible health effects."
I agree that the public should be concerned if regulators show bias -- either in favor of the chemical industry or against it. I wonder, if Richardson's comments had been anti-BPA, would the reaction have been the same?
The Swiss newspaper Hangelszeitung is reporting that Huntsman Corp. considers both Clariant AG and Ciba Specialty Chemicals AG to be attractive takeover candidates.
If your German is rusty, Bloomberg has a story on the wire this morning summarizing the report in English.
Peter Huntsman told the Zurich newspaper that his company would be interested in all or parts of the companies. Both Ciba and Clariant are big players in the plastic colorant market.
Huntsman told the paper that he would not make a hostile takeover.
Bloomberg quoted an analyst who is sceptical that Clariant would be interested in a deal.
"Clariant has streamlined its businesses, it wouldn't make industrial or financial sense to sell some parts now,"' said Martin Flueckiger, an analyst at Helvea in Zurich. "The company has repeatedly said it wants to stay independent."
He added that Ciba is not attractive at its current price.
Celebrity blog radaronline commented: "With the green movement taking off as the greatest trend since the 'Rachel' haircut, former 'Friends' star Jennifer Aniston is finding herself on the wrong side of the hour's most polarizing topic: drinking bottled water. Aniston recently jumped on board as spokeswoman for Smartwater, booking the back page ad in July's W and thereby siding against a growing number of increasingly important environmentalists.
"Victoria Kaplan of Food and Water Watch is forwarding a movement called "quitting the bottle," citing such early adopters as celebrity chef Alice Waters and others who, because of the impact plastic containers have on the environment, are starting to serve from the tap instead of the bottle in their restaurants. "Consumers are waking up to the myth of bottled water, despite celebrity endorsement," says Kaplan. With 86 percent of bottles being tossed rather than recycled, Aniston is making a political statement, whether she knows it or not, Kaplan says."
(Radar later softened its criticism, pointing out that Aniston saves water by taking 3-minute showers. Important to know!)
It's all silly, of course. But the fact that anti-plastics rhetoric is reported in the celebrity gossip headlines has an impact on consumer attitudes.
A county commissioner in Alabama wants to revoke a tax break that was granted to a local GE Plastics plant in the early 1980s because the business is being sold to Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
This story from the Montgomery Advertiser explains Lowndes County Commissioner Robert Harris' plan to revoke a property tax break for GE Plastics' Burkville plant.
Harris, who called Lowndes the second-poorest county in Alabama, doesn't care for a foreign government owning the major employer in the county.
"We are looking at the contract itself," he said of the ongoing tax break for the plant. "We don't know clearly yet if we can do anything."
SABIC is a state-owned company that produces basic chemicals, intermediates, specialty products, polymers, fertilizers and metals.
It recently announced it will purchase the GE Plastics division for $11.6 billion, and part of the deal will include the Burkville plant.
If the county's legal team decides the commission can change or revoke the tax break, Harris thinks that will happen quickly.
"I am sure we would not have any other choice but to look at that," he said.
This is just about the craziest idea I've heard. If Toyota (a "foreign" company) wanted to build a plant in Lowndes County, would the commission give it a tax break? Of course it would.
The really surprising thing to me is how this bias is cropping up in towns where GE Plastics has a long history as a responsible corporate citizen. Remember that back in March, the Berkshire, Mass., Eagle ran a very stern editorial that called a proposed GE Plastics sale to Sabic "the worst case scenario for the sale of the company." That column went on to make a link between Sabic and terrorism.
I think this anti-Saudi bias is going to continue to surface. It will be very interesting to see how Sabic, and GE Plastics, deal with the issue. Perhaps we're already seeing part of the strategy. At Chinaplas last week, one observer pointed out that none of the executives at Sabic's booth were wearing traditional robes -- they were all dressed in western-style business suits. Was Sabic trying to send a subtle message?
Here's an update from California: a bill that would ban use of phthalates in children's toys was rejected yesterday, according to this report in the Sacramento Bee.
The measure, Assembly Bill 1108, would have prohibited phthalates from teethers, rattles, rubber duckies, plastic play books and other products designed for children younger than 3.
The Assembly voted twice on the measure Tuesday. The final tally was 36-31, five votes short of the majority needed for passage.
Most Republicans opposed the bill, but the fatal blow was dealt by 13 Democrats, most of them moderates, who abstained from voting.
According to the story, Fiona Ma, the sponsor of the bill, may ask for another vote "in coming days."
What a story to have waiting in my email box when I returned to the states: last fall, Dow Chemical Co. pursued a deal to acquire DuPont Co.
The story is on the New York Times' Web site, featured in a double-barreled lead about how the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating events that led Dow to fire two senior officials, Romeo Kreinberg and J. Pedro Reinhard, over alleged unauthorized M&A talks.
Last fall, Dow made an overture to acquire DuPont in a deal worth more than $40 billion, according to people involved in the talks. If the approach had ultimately led to a deal, it would have combined the largest and third-largest chemical companies in the United States. ExxonMobil is No. 2.
Shares of Dow and DuPont traded somewhat erratically at the time, though neither company disclosed the approach. From September to December, shares of DuPont climbed 15 percent.
DuPont rebuffed Dow's advances and never engaged in negotiations, these people said. Dow's chief executive, Andrew N. Liveris, sits on the board of Citigroup with Alain J. P. Belda, the chief executive of Alcoa, who at the time of the overture was also a director of DuPont; Mr. Belda stepped down from DuPont's board in March.
Dow declined to comment. A DuPont spokeswoman did not return a call last night seeking comment.
It doesn't look like Dow is in a good position to make a big purchase like DuPont right now. It looks like top Dow executives might be tied up in investigations and lawsuits for several months, if not longer. But if things clear up later this year, what other target might Dow want to pursue?
I'm in Guangzhou this week for Asia's largest plastics trade show, Chinaplas. This is my first trip to China, and several people have asked for my impressions.
Here's a rough lis, without any regard for importance:
The show is huge, and very international. There are 1,578 exhibitors, and about 1,000 are from outside China. Adsale, the organizer, did not announce attendance figures yet today, but should have some numbers ready in a few hours. The show seemed pretty busy.
Exhibiting companies seemed to have a lot of news, as many are growing here to serve the expanding market.
Traffic is unbelievable. I've been teaching my youngest daughter to drive the past few months, and I never get to the point with her where I cover my eyes and hope for the best. That happened twice today. I don't know how we missed that pedestrian...
I've heard a variety of strategies for serving the Chinese market, and right now it seems like everything is working OK. It will be interesting to see, if there's a downturn, which strategies really work the best.
I'm looking forward to the second day of the show. All day today, people were interested in whether the GE Plastics sale to Sabic had been finalized. But it wasn't announced until after the show closed. Tomorrow, I think there will be plenty of buzz about the news. Interestingly, Sabic is exhibiting at Chinaplas, but GE Plastics -- which my colleague tells me usually has a huge presence at the show -- isn't here.
London's Financial Times reported today that four bidders have submitted "final offers" for GE Plastics, valuing the Pittsfield, Mass.-based engineering thermoplastic supplier at up to $12 billion.
According to the report, the bidders are Saudi Basic Industries Corp., Koch Industries (possibly working with private equity firm Blackstone), private equity firm Apollo, and polypropylene maker Basell.
A decision on the sale, part of GE's strategy of divesting commodity businesses to focus on higher-growth industries is due in the next two weeks. GE declined to comment.
The potential buyers are the same ones that have been mentioned for several months (although India's Reliance seems to have dropped out, or perhaps was never a serious candidate). If the $12 billion figure is accurate, then it looks like this sale will exceed General Electric's expectations.
Bloomberg is reporting today that Apollo Management LP, Saudi Basic Industries Corp. and Basell NA each bid more than $10 billion for GE Plastics. The story quotes three unnamed "people with direct knowledge of the auction."
All three contenders have submitted offers and are meeting with GE executives this week to get more information on the Pittsfield, Massachusetts-based division, said the people, who declined to be identified because the process isn't public. The purchase may be announced as soon as this month.
Spokesmen for the companies who could be reached declined comment.
The story speculates that Apollo might have an edge because it bought GE Advanced Materials last year.
Saudi Basic's advantage, should it make the purchase, will stem from the Middle East chemical makers' access to abundant sources of raw materials such as natural gas. Sabic uses petroleum feedstock provided by state-owned Saudi Aramco, the world's biggest oil company, putting its costs lower than U.S.- based and European chemical companies.
Basell, the world's biggest maker of polypropylene, would be able to expand its lines of plastics and benefit from production volume. The Hoofddorp, Holland-based company was acquired by New York-based Access Industries Inc. two years ago.
This story has enough specific information about the deal that it sounds on target. I think Apollo, Sabic and Basell would all be very different owners, although any major changes in strategy could take months or years to develop. Stay tuned.
Bloomberg is reporting that Romeo Kreinberg and J. Pedro Reinhard, fired by Dow Chemical Co. for allegedly holding unauthorized merger talks, have sued the company and CEO Andrew Liveris for $675 million. The company, meantime, has filed a suit against the pair seeking to recover $50.9 million in bonuses paid to the pair.
``I am deeply saddened that I have to file a lawsuit to clear my good name and restore my reputation against a company to which I devoted 37 years of loyal service,'' Reinhard said in an e-mail statement. ``I have and will continue to categorically deny that I have been part of any secret effort to take over or acquire Dow Chemical.''
Dow's suit seeks $30.9 million from Reinhard and $20 million from Kreinberg, representing stock and cash bonuses awarded in the past three years, and an end to financial obligations to the men. The company also is seeking damages against Reinhard, 61, and Kreinberg, 56, for breach of fiduciary duties.
Kreinberg's lawyer, Stanley Arkin, told Bloomberg that "in light of the injury they did, [$675 million] was very modest." Kreinberg, who formerly headed Dow's plastics business, is suing for $400 million in defamation and $200 million for wrongful termination.
The lawsuits aren't a surprise. What will be surprise is if anyone in this group ever sees the inside of a courtroom. The question is, how mud will these guys throw before they settle?
I'll be blogging from Antec 2007 and Plastics Encounter in Cincinnati for the next few days. One of the highlights today was the speech by incoming Society of Plastics Engineers President Vicki Flaris, who spoke about the vision and direction of SPE.
One of her main points was how globalization is changing the plastics industry, and how the changes are affecting SPE:
The plastics industry is truly global. Manufacturing and research are migrating to China and India. It is expected that by 2020, the Asian region will be the leading producer of polymers. New developments for polymers will occur at an extremely fast pace in cross-disciplinary fields such as biochemistry, electronics and communications. International corporations are expected to spend most of their R&D money in China, the U.S., and India, in that order.
New centers of materials R&D are emerging in Singapore, China, South Korea and Taiwan, owing to major government funding. In 2000, 500,000 engineering degrees were awarded in China out of 1 million engineering degrees awarded globally in materials science and engineering.
SPE's motto for 2007-08 is "No borders," because, she said, "There are no geographical borders for polymer research, there are no borders for where extra polymer capacity is added, and there are no borders where the information can, and will, flow."
This trend isn't new, but it's interesting to step back and get someone else's perspective on how globalization is changing plastics, and to see how SPE is reacting. I think they're on the right track.
A May 2 decision to recall some vinyl baby bibs because they contain lead is generating a lot of headlines. What's interesting to me is how the issue got attention in the first place: a woman in suburban Chicago decide to test her grandson's vinyl-backed bib.
The Arlington Heights, Ill., Daily Herald has a follow-up story today on Marilyn Furer, the grandmother-activist, whose grandson Jensen started the ball rolling:
Jensen would also put the bib in his mouth when he was hungry, something that came to Marilyn Furer’s attention when he started using the vinyl-backed bibs.
It caused Marilyn to think back to reports she had heard of lead being found in plastic school lunch boxes.
“So there I think, hmmm, plastic in the mouth, plastic in school lunch boxes. What the heck, I’ll just go get a (lead testing) kit just to play it safe. I never thought it would come out like that.”
Using a household lead test kit produced by Homax Products Inc., she crushed the two points on the barrel of the testing swab, shook the swab and squeezed it until a yellow liquid appeared on the tip. Then she rubbed the swab tip on the test area. To her surprise, the swab tip turned pink, indicating the presence of lead. She wound up testing 20 bibs, with eight of them yielding a positive result.
She sent the bibs, which were made in China and sold at Wal-Mart, to the Center for Environmental Health in Oakland, Calif., which had done the research on the lunch boxes.
Testing commissioned by the center revealed that one of the Baby Connection brand vinyl bibs, which were sold exclusively at Wal-Mart stores, had a lead level of 9,700 parts per million, more than 16 times greater than the legal limit for lead in paint.
Now Marilyn Furer wants a ban on lead-based products used by infants and children.
The Vinyl Insitute reacted well to this story, putting out a news release yesterday explaining its position.
“Lead does not need to be used in babies’ bibs,” said Tim Burns, president of the Vinyl Institute. “You don’t need lead to make vinyl, and most vinyl products don’t contain lead.”
He added: “This is a lead issue, not a vinyl issue. It appears that although lead may not have been added deliberately, it made its way into products from some environmental or workplace source. It is critical for manufacturers, importers and retailers globally to work together to set and enforce policies to address these concerns.”
As the Daily Herald story notes, the bibs were imported from China. As we've also seen from the melamine/pet food story, new measures are desperately needed to ensure the safety of products being imported into North America.
Computer maker Apple Inc. tried to quiet critics of the company's environmental record today with long open letter posted on Apple's Web site.
The letter from CEO Steve Jobs, titled "A Greener Apple," goes into detail about Apple's efforts to remove various toxic chemicals from its products, and to recycle old Macs and iPods. The letter makes some plastics-related promises, specifically related to PVC and brominated flame retardants: "Apple plans to completely eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in its products by the end of 2008."
Here are some details:
Some companies have made promises to phase out other toxic chemicals like polyvinyl chloride (PVC), a type of plastic primarily used in the construction industry but also found in computer parts and cables, and brominated flame retardants, or BFRs, which reduce the risk of fire. Apple began phasing out PVC twelve years ago and began restricting BFRs in 2001. For the past several years, we have been developing alternative materials that can replace these chemicals without compromising the safety or quality of our products. Today, we’ve successfully eliminated the largest applications of PVC and BFRs in our products, and we’re close to eliminating these chemicals altogether. For example, more than three million iPods have already shipped with a BFR-free laminate on their logic boards.
Dell and Lenovo have publicly stated that they plan to eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in their products in 2009. Hewlett Packard has not yet publicly stated when they will eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in their products, but has said that they will publish a plan by the end of 2007 which will state when in the future they will eliminate the use of these toxic chemicals in their products.
Apple plans to completely eliminate the use of PVC and BFRs in its products by the end of 2008.
A note of comparison — In 2007 HP stated that they will remove PVC from all their packaging. Apple did this 12 years ago. Last year, Dell began the process of phasing out large quantities of brominated flame retardants in large plastic enclosure parts. Apple’s plastic enclosure parts have been bromine-free since 2002.
In one environmental group’s recent scorecard, Dell, HP and Lenovo all scored higher than Apple because of their plans (or “plans for releasing plans” in the case of HP). In reality, Apple is ahead of all of these companies in eliminating toxic chemicals from its products.
We are cheering! Steve Jobs has decided to bring us closer to the greener apple that Mac users all over the world have been asking for.
Today we saw something we've all been waiting for: the words "A Greener Apple" on the front page of Apple's site, with a message from Steve Jobs saying "Today we're changing our policy."
It's not everything we asked for. Apple has declared a phase out of the worst chemicals in its product range, Brominated Fire Retardants (BFRs) and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) by 2008. That beats Dell and other computer manufactures' pledge to phase them out by 2009. Way to go Steve!
Greenpeace can take credit for forcing this change. But it will be up to Apple and its suppliers to find materials that perform as well.
Dow Chemical Co. CEO Andrew Liveris yesterday "launched an impassioned defense" of his strategy, according to thisFinancial Times story, saying he had "earned the right" to run the company.
Andrew Liveris told the Financial Times that over the past few months he "felt I was in a rugby scrum" as takeover rumors intensified and the alleged plot to sell the company to a buyout group led to the sacking of two high-level employees.
The turmoil at Dow, the largest chemical group in the US, underlines the pressures faced by companies that attempt to overhaul their business while remaining listed, bucking the current trend for private equity takeovers.
Mr Liveris argued that the majority of shareholders backed his plan to reduce Dow's reliance on commodity businesses and focus on higher-margin products in an attempt to reduce the traditional cyclicality of its earnings.
"Few people remember that in 2002-2003 we were on our knees. We have earned the right to transform this company," he said, noting that unlike most of its competitors Dow wanted to remain independent and publicly listed.
I'm sure Liveris is ready for the soap opera that has been Dow Chemical's past few months to end. Appealing directly to investors, via the press, looks like a good strategy.
Reuters has an interesting story today about which potential buyers are still interested in GE Plastics. The meat of the story is entirely attributed to "sources familiar with the situation," so there's no way to tell if it's inside information or just Wall Street speculation. But it's very interesting nonetheless, especially for GE Plastics employees (and perhaps their competitors).
Private equity firms Bain Capital, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. [KKR.UL] and TPG [TPG.UL] are no longer involved in the process, these sources told Reuters, with Carlyle Group's status unclear.
Blackstone Group [BG.UL] remains in the bidding, separate sources say. Apollo Management appears to have advanced to the second round as well, sources say.
At least two corporate buyers -- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (SABIC) (2010.SE: Quote, Profile, Research), the world's largest chemical firm by market value, and Basell (BASL.UL: Quote, Profile, Research), the Dutch petro-chemical maker -- are also expected to submit second-round offers for the division, according to some of the sources.
It was unclear whether Koch Industries, the world's largest private company, which Reuters previously reported had partnered with Blackstone, was still in the running.
GE shed very little light on the topic at its annual meeting yesterday. Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt told reporters that the company expects to close a deal in the third quarter, which is what they've been saying for a while.
The Los Angeles Times won a Pulitzer Prize for explanatory reporting for "Altered Oceans," its series that "revealed how man has choked the oceans with trash and basic nutrients -- killing advanced sea life, making people sick and effectively reversing the course of evolution back toward "the primeval seas of hundreds of millions of years ago."
The fourth part of the five-part series focuses on the "plastic plague" of marine debris.
If you wonder why cities in California are banning polystyrene food service products and polyethylene grocery bags, reading this story will help explain why these issues are getting so much legislative attention this year.
Dow Chemical Co. remains in the news today following last week's firing of senior executives Romeo Kreinberg and J. Pedro Reinhard. The latest news: Reinhard has released a statement denying that he was "involved in any clandestine effort to take over the company," and Dow is taking steps to remove Reinhard from its board of directors.
According to an Associated Press report, Reinhard's statement says: "I categorically deny that I have been part of any secret effort to take over or acquire Dow Chemical." It adds: "I have always faithfully complied with my fiduciary duties to Dow," and "My conscience is clear."
On the board action: Midland, Mich.-based Dow announced that its board has "authorized a revised slate of nominees" to be considered at the company's May 10 annual meeting. The new slate includes "each of the current directors, with the exception of J. Pedro Reinhard."
What happens if shareholders already returned their proxy, casting their ballots for the board of directors? Dow said it will not count ballots cast for the board's nominees for Reinhard, "in light of his no longer being a nominee of the Board of Directors."
I don't think we've heard the last word on this battle. Corporate annual meetings typically are boring, scripted affairs, but Dow's annual meeting could be a bit more interesting this year.
Dow Chemical Co. announced this morning that it has terminated two top officials: Pedro Reinhard, a senior advisor and member of the board of directors, and Romeo Kreinberg, one of the company's top plastics executives. A news release from the company accused the pair of engaging in "business activity that was highly inappropriate and a clear violation of Dow’s Code of Business Conduct. Reinhard and Kreinberg were involved in unauthorized discussions with third parties about the potential acquisition of the Company.
"The Company took swift action: information about the misconduct was first disclosed to Dow on Tuesday, April 10; the Board of Directors was informed on Wednesday, April 11; and the employees were terminated this morning with full support of the Board.
“The values of integrity and respect for people are at the very core of our Company,” said Andrew Liveris, chairman and CEO. “I think I speak for all employees when I say we are greatly saddened by the disrespect shown by our former colleagues. But we will move on to shape our future with an even greater resolve to execute our strategy and deliver value to our shareholders. We will uphold Dow’s 110-year history of commitment to the highest standards of integrity, ethical conduct and corporate governance.”
It will be interesting to see if this news is linked to all of the rumors about Dow being acquired that have circulated in the business press for several weeks.
Earlier this week, Dow announced that it is forming a styrenics joint venture with Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LP.
The Science Museum in London will open a new exhibit, "Plasticity – 100 years of making plastics," on May 22. The show will run until January 2009. The event is timed to coincide with the 100th anniversary of Leo Baekeland's patent on Bakelite, on July 14, 1907, the plastics industry's birthday.
The news release from the museum makes it sound like it has an interesting collection of products to display:
Among the 400 exhibits are design classics such as Ekco radios and Art Deco mantle clocks, beautifully engraved cigarette boxes, the 1960s Finnish Futuro House whose design was inspired by the Apollo space mission craft, a 1960s PVC mac and boots, a polyurethane 2006 World Cup football, a working chandelier made from hundreds of Bic biros, an ergonomically designed Herman Miller Mirra office chair, made from recyclable materials and itself 96% recyclable, and even an extremely rare Bakelite coffin together with a phone made from plant-based plastics.
The exhibition will reveal the simultaneous but separate work of Baekeland and British scientist Sir James Swinburne to discover the formula for Bakelite – Baekeland pipping Swinburne to the patent by 24 hours – and will draw on the Museum’s collections to present an array of Bakelite products.
Plasticity will be brought up to the modern day with new uses of plastics, such as plastic blood, a wondrously light and resilient ski suit, a plastic model-producing printer and aeroplanes which are able to change shape during flight to optimise flight at different speeds.
Susan Mossman, a curator at the museum, also is the author and editor of a Early Plastics: Perspectives 1850-1950, a book on the history of early plastics. She's quoted in the release: “The story of plastics is a key story of the material world over the past century. Plastics allowed a consumer revolution with the cheap mass production of an array of goods such as radios, televisions, computers, synthetic clothing and disposable biros and razors. However, whilst we have become reliant on plastics for a variety of consumer goods, this exhibition will enable visitors to consider the changes needed in the production, reuse, recycling and disposal of plastics to continue enjoying them in the future.”
If you're a fan of plastics industry history, a visit to this museum sounds interesting. Also watch on Aug. 6 for Plastics News' special report, "Celebrating a Century of Plastics."
During a webcast today announcing a new Xenoy resin for fuel tanks, GE Plastics spokesman Chris Tessier gave a short update on the possible sale of the company.
Tessier said General Electric Co. is sharing information with potential bidders now, and hopes to announce a serious bidder in second quarter, with deal closing later this year.
A few more communities made headlines today for considering plastic grocery bag bans. The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors is considering a ban on polyethylene bags, similar to San Francisco's, at a meeting today. Here's a link to the motion that's being considered.
The Los Angeles Times has a interesting story on its Web site about how San Francisco's law would not make sense in LA because the city doesn't have a composting infrastructure for handling degradable bags. But don't think that means plastic bags are off the hook. One environmentalist suggests that the solution should be to ban all plastic bags -- both the polyethylene and degradable varieties.
"We're all for any community that wants to pursue a ban on plastic bags," said Mark Murray, executive director of Californians Against Waste, a nonprofit group based in Sacramento.
"But if I was going to Los Angeles or any other communities that are thinking they might take this approach, we would propose they look at a straight-out ban on plastic bags" — including compostable plastic bags, he said.
Meantime, a small community on the opposite coast also is making noise about banning plastic bags. Isle of Wight, Va., a small county on the James River near Smithfield, blames plastic bags for, among other things, contaminating the local cotton crop.
Tom Ivy, chairman of the Isle of Wight board, said he's not sure Isle of Wight has the power to ban the bags because Virginia is a Dillon Rule state. That means cities and counties can only exercise powers granted by the state.
But it's worth looking into, Ivy said, if the bags damage farmers' crops. Cotton is a major crop in Isle of Wight, where farmers grew 19,600 acres of it in 2005 - the second-highest producer of cotton in the state.
Bags can go through cotton gins, which shred them into pieces that can damage the cotton's quality, Parker said.
Plastic bag makers are going to have a tough time fighting to keep their products legal in cities and towns as geographically and demographically diverse as Los Angeles and Isle of Wight.
Dow Chemical Co. and Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LP announced this morning that they have signed a deal that would form a joint venture combining their polystyrene and styrene monomer businesses in the Americas.
This is definitely a trend: Nova Chemicals Corp. and Ineos Group announced the same kind of deal in late March.
Dow intends to contribute: a styrene monomer plant (Camacari, Brazil) and six polystyrene plants (Gales Ferry, Connecticut; Ironton, Ohio; Joliet, Il.; Torrance, Calif.; Cartagena, Colombia; and Guaruja, Brazil). Chevron Phillips Chemical intends to contribute a styrene monomer plant (St. James, La.) and a polystyrene plant (Marietta, Ohio).
In semi-related news, Dow came out with a firm denial of the rumors of a leveraged buyout that drove the company's stock up yesterday.
The San Francisco Chroniclereports on Page 1 today that parents of newborns are so concerned about leaching bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles that glass bottles are making a comeback -- and local stores can't get enough to keep up with demand.
As the story says, some parents simply don't want to take any chances with their children's health. It's the "precautionary principle," but instead of government making the decision, families are making the choices.
After reading The Chronicle's November story about bisphenol A and phthalates, David Lippman of Berkeley switched his 16-month-old daughter, Lucina, to glass bottles and sippy cups made of softer, opaque plastic, which some environmental health advocates are promoting as a safer alternative to polycarbonate.
"She's going to be exposed to enough plastics in the world that I can't be so obsessed about it," Lippman said. But "it was something small I could do in my own home."
The story cites three suppliers of glass baby bottles that all report seeing a big jump in sales -- one cited a 10-fold increase.
I'm not sure that glass really qualifies as a safe alternative to polycarbonate. I'd be concerned about breakage. But this is a trend worth watching.
Dog food and car interiors. What do they have in common? Both products have been in the news recently. But, more specifically, both stories are hard to understand because media reports on the topics seem too simplified, and scientific experts quoted give contradictory explanations. I'll call them "whose science do you believe?" stories.
The pet food story is a good example. A week ago, the Food and Drug Administration said melamine in certain brands of pet foods was killing dogs and cats. FDA linked melamine to wheat gluten from China, and announced that companies had voluntarily recalled certain products. In the past week, the news wires have been filled with stories and updates. Various experts have either disputed or confirmed FDA's theory. It's not clear to pet lovers whether melamine is to blame, and, if so, where it came from. It's all very confusing.
The other "whose science do you believe?" story is the result from a report from a Michigan group called the Ecology Center that charges that plastics in car interiors emit toxins. The group's newest report ranks cars, so that consumers can avoid cars that emit the most and worst toxins.
Here's what a typical news story, from CBC News, had to say about the report:
A new report from a U.S. environmental group suggests the "new car smell" long beloved by the purchasers of vehicles could be a sign of harmful chemicals inside the car.
Much of the smell comes from plastics and materials used inside the car, from the steering wheel to the dashboard to the carpets — parts often made with chemicals including flame retardants, plasticizers and other chemicals that can give off gas or leach into the environment.
However, shortly after that report was released, another came out with the opposite conclusion.
Toxicologist Jeroen Buters at the Technical University of Munich in Germany and his colleagues investigated the health effects of volatile organic compounds that cars emit. They focused on conditions mimicking those where the molecules would likely get emitted most in cars—when parked in hot sunshine. ... New car smell does not appear to be toxic, the scientists found. Air from the new car did cause a slight aggravation of the immune response that could affect people with allergies, but the same was not seen with the older vehicle.
Which report should we believe? It's hard to tell. One place I like to check is www.stats.org, which is affiliated with the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University. The site monitors the media to expose abuse of science and statistics. (The site has a post on the "new car smell" toxin story that's worth reading.)
But if most of the news media won't bother to put these "whose science do you believe?" stories into the proper context, we certainly can't count on most consumers to do it themselves.
Portland, Ore., may be the next U.S. city to ban plastic bags. The Portland Business Journal has a story on the Web today quoting a staffer for city commissioner Sam Adams, saying that he might introduce plastic bag ban legislation this summer.
"He's concerned about the problem that all litter, but especially plastic bags, cause in our society," said Shoshanah Oppenheim, a policy analyst for Adams. "They're a nonrenewable resource. They exist forever and they're a common source of litter."
Adams has poll on his blog where readers can give him feedback on the proposal. So far, the comments are strongly in favor of a ban.
You know an issue is the focus of mainstream American thought when USA Today makes it the focus of its lead editorial. That's the case today with a thoughtful column on the San Franciso plastic bag ban.
McPaper comes out against the ban, with a provocative headline: "Our view on the environment: Plastic-bag ban full of holes." But the column isn't exactly a pro-plastics essay. The writers just feel that the ban is misdirected.
The real culprit is the slob who litters or refuses to recycle either one — or communities that don't provide the means for him to do so. Our throwaway society is to blame as well.
The best answer to the paper or plastic question is neither. Each individual can do more to help the environment by reusing whatever bags groceries distribute or buying a canvas sack to carry goods.
Public education campaigns about littering and recycling can help more than ineffective bans on products that are used every day by billions of people worldwide. It needn't take 1,000 years to alter anti-social behavior.
Keeping with the newspaper's tradition, the editorial page also features a counterpoint. In this case, the author is Ross Mirkarimi, a San Francisco supervisor who authored the ban. Its headline: "100 billion reasons for ban. We’re protecting the environment, and we’re saving oil, too."
(That definitely would depend on whether consumers start using reusable bags, because if they don't the energy will continue to be used, only in the manufacture and transport of paper or degradable plastic bags. And the claim ignores the fact that U.S. polyethylene producers use natural gas, not oil, to make resin. But let's not cloud this argument with too many facts...)
"Despite San Francisco's excellent residential recycling program, the recycling rate for plastic bags is only 1 percent," he writes. "Each year, we spend $8 million sweeping bags from our streets, untangling them from recycling machinery, scooping them from storm drains so sewers don't back up, and, ultimately, dumping them into landfills. Local governments are subsidizing the production of waste because producers know that whatever they manufacture and distribute, taxpayers will shoulder the bill. This is unacceptable."
How many more U.S. cities will adopt plastic bag bans this year? In the spirit of the NCAA tournament (I still can't believe I picked Texas), I'd put the over-under at 10.
San Francisco's decision to ban plastic grocery bags is generating headlines in news media around the globe. But the story won't end there. In the next few days, newspapers and TV news crews around the country will be looking at whether their cities should do the same thing.
One place where journalists go for story ideas is Al's Morning Meeting, a Web site updated daily with suggestions from Al Tompkins of the Poynter Institute, a training ground for journalists in St. Petersburg, Fla.
Why is that relevant to the plastics industry? Because Al's column today leads with the plastic bag ban story. It's loaded with data, potential story angles and links for more information. You can be sure that a fair number of media outlets around the country will pick up on his story ideas.
So if you're in the bag making or plastics recycling business, don't be surprised if you get a call in the next couple of days from a local reporter looking for a bag ban-related story.
Better yet, why not pick up the phone and make the first move? Make sure the local media knows what's at stake for your company, and your local employees, if a ban comes. Or highlight what you're doing with recycled or degradable plastics, and your efforts to make your company "green" and "sustainable." Reporters are looking for local angles now, and this is an opportunity to make sure they include your point of view.
The Berkshire Eagle in Pittsfield, Mass., has a surprising editorial on its Web site today that is very critical of Saudi Basic Industries Corp.'s reported bid for GE Plastics.
"The purchase of GE Plastics by a Saudi Arabian firm would likely be the worst case scenario for the sale of the company, and not just because this would be another American firm sold to a foreign interest," the column says. "The company's strong ties to the Saudi government, which while nominally anti-terrorist has leaked money to terrorist groups and individuals, should set off alarms about the rumored sale."
More provocative language comes later in the column:
It is safe to say that Sabic and its overlords in Riyadh will have no loyalty to Pittsfield and the 420 employees of GE Plastics here, should the sale go through. GE doesn't necessarily have to sell to Sabic, but if it offers the best bid, stockholders concerned only with their dividends will undoubtedly demand it, and with GE CEO Jeffrey R. Immelt on the record that the Plastics Division is up for sale not because it is unprofitable but because it isn't profitable enough, corporate headquarters won't concern itself with the greater good.
Surely Washington would step in? Not given the complex business ties the Bush family has had with the Saudi ruling family going back to the first President Bush. These links have prompted the Bushes to overlook all manner of Saudi behavior that has enabled the growth of terrorism within its borders. There may be nothing to stop a sale that has many possible ramifications, none of them good.
I was very surprised to see these comments in print, especially since they appear as the official editorial position of the Eagle, which is GE Plastics' hometown newspaper. If Sabic ends up buying GE Plastics, it looks like the paper and the company will be quite unfriendly.
San Francisco's board of supervisors voted 10-1 Tuesday to ban plastic bags from supermarkets and pharmacies.
The law kicks in in six months, and will require stores to use paper or degradable plastic bags instead.
The San Francisco Chronicleeditorialized in favor of the legislation on Tuesday. In part, the column sings the praises of degradable plastics:
The California Grocers Association has put up a vigorous resistance to the regulation, arguing that it would be confusing and costly for consumers. The grocers have been threatening to go back to paper bags if the ordinance passes.
But after hearing the arguments of both sides, it seems to us far more likely that consumers will be demanding the compostable bags once they learn of their advantages over the petroleum-based "throwaway" plastic bags.
Among the superior attributes of the biodegradable bags, which are typically made of starches from potatoes and corn:
-- They're stronger. "The days of double-bagging your loaf of bread would be over," said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, author of the compostable bag ordinance.
-- They can go straight into the green recycling bin. They would be clearly marked as biodegradable.
-- They're versatile. Today, far too much food waste heads to the landfill because of what some recycling advocates call the "ick factor." With a biodegradable bag, you could scoop the food scraps into the bag, then, quickly and neatly, plunk it all into the green bin.
-- They're environmentally friendly. Plastic bags are a huge nuisance: they pose a threat to marine life, they gum up recycling machines and they consume landfill space.
Perhaps this is the wave of the future. It will be incumbent on San Francisco to set up an infrastructure to collect and compost these bags, otherwise there's not much advantage to using them.
Who do you think the city will expect to finance such a collection infrastructure?
London's Financial Times is reporting that Saudi Basic Industries Corp. is getting ready to bid for GE Plastics, and that the bid will be up to $12 billion. That's a couple of billion higher than what analysts predicted when GE Plastics first went on the block.
According to the report, Sabic is working with Citigroup "to prepare an indicative offer ahead of the first round of the auction in mid-April."
The story also mentions many of the "usual suspects" said to be interested: Blackstone and Koch Industries; Apollo; KKR; Carlyle Group; and Bain Capital. In addition to Koch and Sabic, the other potential strategic buyers are Reliance Industries and Basell, according to the report.
I'm not big on bashing lawyers (except in jest), but this does seem a bit like the modern equivalent of chasing ambulances. A plastics processor reader told me that her company got a call from a firm soliciting it to join a class action suit with other users of plastic additives.
She was referred to a Web site called plasticrefund.com that explains who is eligible for the refund. This particular class action suit is the result of an antitrust complaint that dates back to 2005 involving a dozen suppliers of additives. The materials in question include some heat stabilizers and impact modifiers.
The reader told me: "The firm is based out of D.C. with the sole intent to make filing appellate papers easier for the attorney in class action suits. I found it a bit scary to be called on the phone to join in a lawsuit regarding using materials." I agree.
Emeryville, Calif., is the newest city to ban polystyrene food service products from local restaurants, according to this story from the Oakland, Calif., Tribune. The city council passed an ordinance on Tuesday. The law says restaurants can only use food containers that are biodegradable or recyclable.
As I've noted before, these anti-PS proposals are catching on in California because of the marine debris issue.
"I think we need to be better environmental stewards and take some measures to protect our resources," said Vice Mayor Ruth Atkin, who proposed the change. "I participated for years in our shoreline cleanups, and the little tiny bits of Styrofoam end up getting stuck in the rocks. It's impossible to collect all that stuff. It gets stuck in the nooks and crannies, and birds ingest them."
Restaurants will have to comply by Jan. 1. Fines will start at $100, and go up to $400 for repeat offenses. Oakland and San Francisco have similar laws on the books.
Bob Canter, president of the Emeryville Chamber of Commerce, made sure all its members were notified of the proposed ban, but has heard nary a word about it, yea or nay.
According to the story, many restaurants in Emeryville already have dropped PS food service products.
I didn't realize that today is World Water Day, but the American Chemistry Council shared the news, taking the opportunity to tout the benefits of chlorine chemistry. The news release cites a report that I've seen before, but it's worth featuring:
The American Water Works Association stated in a 2003 report that some 2.2 trillion gallons of water are lost annually in the U.S., primarily as a result of pipe corrosion leaks and breaks.
It's amazing that we waste this much water. It's such a precious resource. But many municipalities, and taxpayers, treat it like it is basically worthless.
Conservatively, though, 2.2 trillion gallons, at the average U.S. municipal cost of $1.50 per 1,000 gallons, works out to $3.3 billion in water wasted annually.
And just imagine what it would be worth if we could save it all, package it in PET and sell it for $1 per bottle out of a vending machine!
Remember "The Gates Project," the big outdoor art display in New York's Central Park by artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude? Back in the winter of 2005, the project got lots of headlines -- it covered 26 miles of walkways, with saffron-colored gates and draperies brightening the city's gray winter exterior. Many news stories erroneously said the gates were made of steel, but actually they were PVC, with components made of high-impact polystyrene, polypropylene and nylon.
The project may soon be in the news again, as Nazareth, Pa.-based Nicos Polymers & Grinding Inc. has been nominated to receive the Innovative Deconstruction Project award from the Building Materials Reuse Association for its role in recycling "The Gates." According to a news release from Nicos, "The nominators believe that design professionals, building owners and community members at-large stand to benefit and learn from demonstration projects such as `The Gates,' which was a socially responsible work of art."
The award will be announced May 14.
Although spring officially is here, it's still a treat to see a bit of color (at least here in still-dreary Akron, Ohio). So check out the slide show and video of "The Gates" on Nicos' Web site.
Dow Chemical Co. has been in the spotlight the past few weeks, since the company has been the subject of rumors that it is about to do a major deal with India's Reliance Industries Ltd.
I've watched as the story has appeared to take on more credibility almost every day. It started with daily updates from the financial press in India and Britain (most of the stories not attributed to any named sources). Then, as Dow's stock price began to jump as a result of the rumors, the financial press in the United States started to take note.
Late today, the Reuters news agency picked up the story, and it seems to put it in the proper perspective.
Analysts said Dow is likely to split off the basic chemicals and plastics business as part of what it calls its "asset light" strategy, which would give it a more nimble and higher-margin profile focusing on specialty chemicals.
"This is the time; there's so much pressure," said Hassan Ahmed, an analyst with HSBC. "So Dow management has a gun to their head to do something."
Dow said it is involved in many different negotiations but would not comment on any specific talks.
"Right now we are examining more than 60 potential (merger and acquisition) deals," said Chris Huntley, a Dow spokesman.
"Joint ventures are at the heart of our asset-light agenda," he added. "We are continually talking to all manner of companies, big and small, as we assess the value to Dow of those companies."
We're covering changes at Dow this week too, concentrating on the plastic-specific facts, but folding in a mention of the Reliance rumors.
Reliance seems to want to make a big splash outside India (the company also has been rumored to have an interest in GE Plastics. A deal with Dow would fit the bill. Is a purchase or major joint venture in the works? We might know very soon.
Composites are changing the commercial aircraft industry at an incredible pace, and Boeing Co. is leading the charge with its 787 Dreamliner. The Seattle (Wash) Times has been doing an excellent job covering the trend, most recently with this profile of Phil Lathrop, a composites expert who leads a trouble-shooting team that's working on what the story calls "the world's first airliner built largely of plastic."
"I got lucky. I picked composites 28 years ago," Lathrop told the newspaper. "This is a composite guy's dream."
This week the company will celebrate the completion of the first 787 tailfin. The link includes a photo of the fin, which will be assembled at Boeing's Frederickson, Wash., plant tomorrow. The leading edge of the fin was delivered complete from China, according to the story.
Lathrop's five-man classic-rock band, named The Composites (of course), will play at a ceremony celebrating the milestone.
The story points out that the University of Washington and some Seattle-area community colleges are working with Boeing to offer composites-materials training. Also, starting next month, the company and the Machinists union will start a 4-year apprenticeship program to train lead-composites technicians.
This looks like a real growth market. And with fuel prices and conservation getting so much attention right now, I think a lot of people getting training in aerospace composites might soon be in demand from the automotive sector.
Interested in what industrial designers think about plastics? Check out the "plastics primer" posted a few days ago on core77.com, a Web site that serves the global design community.
The column is authored by Carl Alviani, an industrial designer at FlatHED in Portland, Ore. It touches on the history of plastics, some significant applications, and the differences among polymers. The column also includes lots of useful links. Although it's intended for designers, the primer has plenty of information that would be useful for folks in the plastics industry. Plus, Alviani reaches some interesting conclusions on how designers should take advantage of the unique nature of different plastics, rather than using them to try to mimic traditional materials.
Product design today frequently means plastics design, and there are a number of compelling reasons to design plastics in a way that distances them from the "cheap plastic" perception. From a marketing standpoint, consumers are wary of objects that look like inferior imitations, and from a sustainability perspective, the less disposable an object feels, the better. The encouraging message for designers is that there is a wide array of ways to achieve this distance. Revealing polymers for what they are is key, as is educating the consumer to appreciate what a perfectly chosen material they hold in their hand, either through marketing or through design cues.
He adds:
Perhaps it's going too far to advocate a total embargo on imitative finishes on polymers, but a limited one seems well in order. Just as building a brick house and then painting it to look like wood is absurd, so too with many consumer goods; especially those, like point-and-shoot cameras, that are guaranteed to eventually be caught out. Given the thousands of alternative ways to allow plastics their own unique aesthetic, and the inexorable forces pushing consumers towards their acceptance, designers are running out of excuses for playing dumb.
Let me relate this to a common design-related complaint about plastics. In many stories that I see about new car and truck models, the reviewers complain about the interiors looking "too plastic," or using "cheap plastics." Is it possible that a radical change in how car designers use plastic could take away this negative perception, and perhaps even turn the negative into a selling point?
A warning first: don't click the link if you have a weak stomach.
Holland Colours Americas Inc. in Richmond, Ind., is featured in this in unusual story from the Richmond Palladium-Item, courtesy of the Associated Press. It tells the story (with some interesting photos!) of Holland's role in helping to create prosthetic fingers for Richard Kinon, a South Carolina carpenter who lost two digits in an industrial accident.
Holland got to use its special color-matching skills to come up with prosthetics with a very realistic matching skin tone. The coloring was hard to deal with, Kinon told the newspaper. To help get it just right, a silicone manufacturing company put him in touch with Amy Brattain, Holland Colours’ industry manager.
Initially, the Holland Colours team thought they could do the skin pigment match using a photograph.
They quickly realized that just like the custom colors for customers who send along a sample of what they’re seeking to match, they needed to match Kinon’s coloring in person.
The company paid for his flight, hotel and meals for a three-day visit so he could work with the research and development team.
“Everybody was very excited about helping Richard meet his goal,” Brattain said.
The effort was a success, as you can see from the photographs. (Admit it, you clicked on the link just to see them!)
San Francisco's board of supervisors may extend their proposed plastic bag ban law to include pharmacies and smaller retailers.
According to this report from the San Francisco Examiner, the board has delayed a vote on the previous proposal, which would require grocery stores that do more than $2 million in sales a year to only use bags made of recyclable paper, compostable plastic or reusable bags.
But the idea isn't dead. Instead, a vote was delayed for two weeks so it can be amended to apply to more stores. The new language applies to all establishments with 5,000 square feet of retail space and a pharmacy license.
“I think we should be consistent. I think that by going directly after grocery markets, we weren’t showing consistency,” said Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier.
I'm afraid that the "compostable plastic" provision in this law has the potential to create some real problems for the city. Although supervisors are aware of the drawbacks, some are set on moving ahead, regardless of the scientific arguments or results of grocers' plastic bag recycling efforts, which were instituted to avoid a bag ban or tax.
Plastic bags have become a scapegoat for litter, recycling and marine debris problems. It doesn't look like consumers in San Francisco will come to their defense.
The Reuters news agency is reporting that Koch Industries Inc. plans to bid for GE Plastics. The report, which quotes "sources close to the process," says Koch is teaming with Blackstone Group.
The story names other bidders, too: Apollo Management, Carlyle Group (teaming up with Texas Pacific Group) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (working with Bain Capital). Many of these companies have other plastics holdings, so it would be interesting to see if, for example, TPG would combine GE Plastics with its existing Kraton business. That's just speculation, of course. But with private equity companies owning so many plastics businesses these days, the possibilities are intriguing.
The Reuters story also says that the bidding teams will receive additional details about GE Plastics' finances by the end of this week. So it doesn't sound like a deal is going to happen in the next week or two.
Koch, which several weeks ago bought Huntsman Corp.'s commodity plastics business, is the second-largest private company in the world, behind Cargill Inc.
The U.S. Chemical Safety Board today issued its report on the April 23, 2004, explosion and fire at Formosa Plastics Corp.'s plant in Illiopolis Ill. Five workers died and three more were seriously injured in the accident.
The report blames human error, but is critical of the company for not doing more to prevent the accident.
The CSB found that both Formosa and Borden Chemical, the company from whom Formosa purchased the plant in 2002, were aware of the possibility of serious consequences of an inadvertent release of chemicals from an operating PVC reactor. But the investigation determined that the measures both companies took were insufficient to prevent human error or minimize its consequences.
A news release from the agency quotes Chairwoman Carolyn W. Merritt: "People do make mistakes. And that is why it is all the more important for chemical plants to design systems that take into account the possibility of such errors." She added: "This accident occurred because the companies involved did not look closely enough at the potential for catastrophic consequences resulting from human error."
The board recommends that Formosa review the design and operation of all of its U.S. PVC facilities. It also urges Formosa "to ensure chemical processes are designed to minimize the consequences of human error, improve control of safety interlocks, more thoroughly investigate high-risk hazards, and consider all consequences in near-miss investigations. Formosa was also urged to improve emergency planning and conduct periodic drills, emphasizing prompt evacuations."
Safety experts at chemical companies across the country will be taking a close look at this report today, looking for steps they can take to make their plants safer.
CSB is a federal agency charged with investigating industrial chemical accidents. It does not issue citations or fines, but does make safety recommendations to plants, industry organizations, labor groups, and regulatory agencies such as OSHA and EPA.
First lady Laura Bush touched on the plastic marine debris issue in remarks yesterday at the Hawaiian Monk Seal Captive Care Project on Midway Atoll.
In response to the question, "What can people back home, do you think, do? What can people at home do to help ensure that these animals have a safe habitat?" she replied:
Well, I hope people will study up about the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, about this very important part of our country and the new monument here that protects the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
But I also hope people will take from this that we need to really pay attention to how we recycle plastic, and to pay attention to everything that you consume at home that's plastic, and how you get rid of it, and just make sure it doesn't someday end up here on one of these islands, or on any other coast, or in the stomach of one of these marine animals.
Plastic marine debris is prominent in my thoughts right now, after hearing Stephanie Barger's comments at our Plastics NewsExecutive Forum in San Diego earlier this week. Barger, founder of the Costa Mesa, Calif.-based Earth Resource Foundation, urged plastics industry leaders in attendance to take this issue seriously, and I think many took her comments to heart.
Seeing Laura Bush echo Stephanie Barger is additional proof that this isn't a fringe issue -- despite what a substantial number of people participating in our current Web poll on the topic seem to believe.
The U.K. tabloid Sunday Express reported yesterday that Dow Chemical Co. is about to get a takeover bid from a consortium of private equity firms.
The big question: is there any substance to the report? MarketWatch's report on the story points out that the Express is "a publication not well-known for its mergers-and-acquisition coverage," and it did not identifiy the source of the information.
The report says the buyout group may include Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts, Blackstone Group and Carlyle Group, and that they plan to break up Midland, Mich.-based Dow into smaller companies.
Dow's shares shot up $3.47, to $46.92, on the news. I'm not sure I'd mortgage the farm on this one.
The Reuters news service has a short item on the wire today quoting BASF AG Chief Executive Officer Juergen Hambrecht on his company's interest in buying GE Plastics.
"I think the price of the [GE Plastics] assets is not within the general target corridor of BASF," Hambrecht said at a news conference, according to the report.
This isn't a surprise. We reported a month ago that industry observers don't expect BASF to be interested in buying all of Pittsfield, Mass.-based GE Plastics. No word on whether BASF might be interested in some parts of the company, if some selected assets became available.