Higher-end plastic food containers are able to keep fruits and vegetables fresher and longer than the cheap ones, but not as much as some of the brands claim, according to a story in Cincinnati's The Enquirer.Its not a scientific test though, as the story headline suggests. The reporter essentially did an informer test on her own, comparing brands including GladWare disposable, Rubbermaid, FresherLonger Miracle and Fresh Vac Im not sure who are the manufacturers for the latter two. The test results are:Least effective was a disposable GladWare container After about three days in the refrigerator, raspberries were showing some mold. I was surprised how long the broccoli lasted, but by about day six, it smelled bad. On the plus size, these are cheap, and it's no big deal if you leave them at a potluck or throw them out. Set of five entrée-sized containers, $3.29.Premier containers from Rubbermaid nest together and have lids that snap to the bottom, so you can keep track of them. Both raspberries and broccoli lasted about a day longer in these than in the disposable containers. $2.49-$8.99 for container sizes 1¼ cups to 14 cups.Fresher Longer Miracle Food Storage containers, sold at Sharper Image and Sur La Table, are air-tight with a rubber gasket and snap-down lid. They're made with plastic that contains antimicrobial silver nanoparticles. However, they are no longer allowed, by a quirk of government regulation, to mention the silver on the packaging. Raspberries didn't have much mold until about a week into the experiment, and broccoli still smelled OK after nine days. Set of 12, $49.95.Fresh Vac containers have rubber gaskets and close with a lock-down handle on the side. You push on the top of a filled container a few times, forcing the air out through a vacuum valve. There's a satisfying whoosh when you open the valve to break the vacuum, which may be the simple reason I liked these best. In my experiment, the raspberries had a little bit of mold after 10 days. They're available at Sur La Table. Set of three, $39.95.
The reporter also included in her test a vacuum-packing system called Food Saver, which worked very effectively: "I ran out of time before the broccoli went bad, and the raspberries took almost two weeks to grow significant fuzz." But the product's selling point is the vacuum mechanism powered by a separate electric pump (another $200) rather than just the plastic materials. I dont think it directly competes with conventional plastic containers. Also, to my surprise, the test skipped well-known and innovative brands like Tupperware.But the take-away message I get from this story is more on the business model side: is it really that traditional plastic products can only be low-margin commodities without much added-value? What can we do to leverage other materials and technologies to increase higher-end use of plastics?