SEARCH

ABOUT
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 10, 2008 11:47 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Washington Post headline misleading.

The next post in this blog is Wal-Mart's sustainable goods (2).

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by Movable Type 4.25





Return to The PN China Blog home page
Go to the PlasticsNews.com/China home page

« Washington Post headline misleading | Main | Wal-Mart's sustainable goods (2) »

Wal-Mart demands sustainable goods from China, but will the suppliers sustain? (1)

It appears that Wal-Mart is giving its Chinese suppliers no option: They must not only deliver the lowest prices on earth, but also make sure these cheap products (American consumers certainly see Wal-Mart items as cheap, but many have no idea how small a fraction of the price tag Wal-Mart pays its suppliers) are Green.

The news came from the latest Wal-Mart Sustainability Summit in Beijing, as reported by Andrew Winston (who just spoke at the Plastics News Sustain ’08 Conference in Chicago) in the Leading Green blog of Harvard Business Online.

Specifically, Wal-Mart mandates that:
All suppliers will sign new agreements indicating compliance with environmental laws, starting with Chinese suppliers to the U.S., U.K., and Canada in just 3 months. Over the next 3 years, all suppliers globally will sign.

The top 200 suppliers will achieve 20% energy efficiency improvement, and most importantly, "By 2012, all suppliers that we buy from directly should source 95% of product from companies that have the highest ratings in audits."
Wal-Mart also asks suppliers for higher-quality products. "Zero defective merchandise returns by 2012" is the goal.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for green and high quality. But someone's got to foot the bill. If that additional cost for sustainability and high quality is expected to be covered by Chinese factories that already struggle on razor-thin profits, good luck with that. Let's see if Wal-Mart can defy the "you get what you pay for" of common sense.

[Please bear with me. I'll continue to post tomorrow.]

TRACKBACK

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.plasticsnews.com/mt-tb.cgi/1785

COMMENTS (3)
Ken McClelland:

I don't buy anything from Wal Mart except Mobile 1 Oil. WalMart is a pox on the US as well as the world economy. We need to get out of the WTO and cancel all free trade agreements. I have been forcasting this collaps of the American way of life, ever since NAFTA. No jobs, no money, no economy.
China and all it's junk producers can Go To and stay put, as far as I am concerned.

Nina:

Thanks for chiming in, Ken. I do suggest you distinguish between China as a nation, the Chinese government, the Chinese people, quality Chinese manufacturers and junk Chinese producers.

John Herbert:

As an Hong Kong based energy efficiency expert I am very worried - it is too easy to simply throw around percentages, for example the 20% cited, what does it really mean, is it 20% reduce based on today's consumption? and who is keeping the records today? direct and indirect consumption? to many questions and no answers.

There are still countless opportunities to lower electricity bills in production facilities, lighting, power, air conditioning, cooling towers can be optimised to lower energy consumption and improve profits.

POST A COMMENT
(Your comment needs to be approved by the site owner before appearing. Thanks for waiting.)