The PolyGreen plastic newspaper bags made and marketed by GP Plastics Corp. may not be living up to its eco-friendly claims. The Dallas, Texas-based company has been "recommended" by the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus to modify or discontinue certain advertising claims, including "100 percent oxo-biodegradable," according to NAD's December 8 press release.
The New York Times, which had planned to switch to PolyGreen bags next year, has responded to the findings and decided to postpone the move to the bags. The Times said it would not use the bags until "further analysis can be conducted and verified."Mike Skinner, the chief financial officer of GP Plastics, told the Times' Green Inc. blog that the NAD's decision was "in no way a legally binding decision or precedent, and the level of scientific and other review that the NAD makes of advertising claims is less extensive than what would occur in a legal proceeding." In the meantime, the company told NAD that it "intends to appeal all findings adverse to GP Plastics in the NAD's decision to the National Advertising Review Board."According to a February 21 press release from GP Plastics, the bag maker uses oxo-biodegradable additives supplied by Willow Ridge Plastics of Erlanger, Kentucky. And the PolyGreen bags have been confirmed by Willow Ridge's tests to "meet the specification of an oxo-biodegradable plastic."The Green Inc. report pointed out that Mexico Plastic Co. Inc. of Mexico, Missouri., a rival maker of newspaper bags, has been challenging GP Plastics' marketing claims.Is it the bag maker's "green wash" or NAD's paranoia? We hope to see more clarity on the issue in the near future.Background link: PN Managing Editor Don Loepp's November 18 blog entry NY Times switching to biodegradable bags.