SEARCH

ABOUT
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 18, 2008 9:23 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Why is GE keeping appliances business?.

The next post in this blog is China's fear of foreign resin.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by Movable Type 4.25





Return to The PN China Blog home page
Go to the PlasticsNews.com/China home page

« Why is GE keeping appliances business? | Main | China's fear of foreign resin »

Plastic bag and government priorities

Have you noticed that the global green wave of anti-plastic-shopping-bags rhetoric and legislation is waning?

For instance, Bulgaria is postponing plans to levy a tax on plastic shopping bags, based on fears that the tax would burden businesses too much during the global financial crisis [see full report from Reuters].

China, the first and only country with a nationwide ban on ultra-thin bags and a nationwide mandate for retailers to charge consumers for shopping bags, is also showing signs of more lax enforcement. The central government appears to be concentrating on other priorities -- like measures to sustain economic growth, such as the adjustment of tariffs on imports and tax rebates on exports.

Here in North America, progress is still being made -- New York state recently adopted a law that mandates recycling of plastic bags at large stores. But the recession and gloomy outlook is holding up some localities from embarking on the bag tax. For instance, Santa Clara county in California (source: press release) decided earlier this month to postpone its vote on a new tax of 25 cents for every shopping bag. The reasoning seems to be that raising tax during a severe economic downturn discourages businesses and the public.

At this moment, the U.K is still going ahead with its bag reduction efforts. Seven large supermarkets in the nation have pledged to the government that they will halve the use of plastic shopping bags by spring 2009, through such methods as charging customers for single-use plastic bags or giving them extra loyalty points for bringing their own. But bag taxes will be reconsidered if retailers fail to fulfill their ambitious pledge.

TRACKBACK

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.plasticsnews.com/mt-tb.cgi/1800

COMMENTS (2)
Mike Frey:

The green movement has only temporarily moved off of the top priority issues among everyday people because they are more concerned with other things at the moment.

I don't like seeing plastic bags festooning the trees like misplaced (ugly) holiday decorations, and agree that it is a problem

Make no mistake; the activists are still out there attacking the plastics industry. I keep a close eye on what they are saying and doing.

Our industry is under constant attack and is almost always too slow to react to negative press. BPA and Phthalates are still looked at like lead poisoning and it is very easy to find anti-plastics rhetoric if you look.

Nina:

Good points, Mike.

The plastics industry definitely needs to take more aggressive steps to educate the consumers and the public about plastic materials' positive attributes, advantages and contribution to the modern society.

In China, advocates are starting to campaign against the "eco-friendly", non-woven, reusable, carrier bags retailers offer, simply because they are actually made of plastic materials like PP or PET. Well, if that logic is valid, should people stop wearing clothes made of synthetic materials like nylon and polyester?

I think consumers are deeply confused and lost. They deserve un-biased facts and guidance.

POST A COMMENT
(Your comment needs to be approved by the site owner before appearing. Thanks for waiting.)