Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Sustainable Plastics
  • Rubber News
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Processor News
    • Suppliers
    • More News
    • Digital Edition
    • End Markets
    • Special Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Resin pricing news
    • Videos
    • Injection Molding
    • Blow Molding
    • Film & Sheet
    • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
    • Rotomolding
    • Thermoforming
    • Recycling
    • Machinery
    • Materials
    • Molds/Tooling
    • Product news
    • Design
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Sustainability
    • Public Policy
    • Material Insights Videos
    • Numbers that Matter
    • Automotive
    • Packaging
    • Medical
    • Consumer Products
    • Construction
    • CEO Issue
    • Diversity
    • Best Places to Work
      • 2022 winners
    • Processor of the Year
    • Rising Stars
    • Women Breaking the Mold
  • Opinion
    • The Plastics Blog
    • Kickstart
    • One Good Resin
    • BRICS and Plastics
    • All Things Data
    • Viewpoint
    • From Pillar to Post
    • Perspective
    • Mailbag
    • Fake Plastic Trees
  • Shop Floor
    • Blending
    • Compounding
    • Drying
    • Injection Molding
    • Purging
    • Robotics
    • Size Reduction
    • Structural Foam
    • Tooling
    • Training
  • Events
    • Plastics News Events
    • Industry Events
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Livestreams/Webinars
    • Editorial Livestreams
    • Ask the Expert
    • Plastics News Events Library
    • Processor of the Year submissions
    • Plastics News Executive Forum
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Plastics News Caps & Closures
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
    • Plastics in Automotive
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Reuters Responsible Business Europe 2022
    • Reifenhäuser Technologies Livestreams
    • Polymer Points Live
    • Numbers that Matter Live
    • Plastics in Politics Live
    • Sustainable Plastics Live
    • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
    • Plastics in Healthcare Library
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
  • Resin Prices
    • All Resins
    • Commodity TPs
    • High Temp TPs
    • ETPs
    • Thermosets
    • Recycled Plastics
    • Historic Commodity Thermoplastics
    • Historic High Temp Thermoplastics
    • Historic Engineering Thermoplastics
    • Historic Thermosets
    • Historic Recycled Plastics
  • Rankings & Data
    • Injection Molders
    • Blow Molders
    • Film Sheet
    • Thermoformers
    • Pipe Profile Tubing
    • Rotomolders
    • Mold/Toolmakers
    • LSR Processors
    • Recyclers
    • Compounders - List
    • Association - List
    • Plastic Lumber - List
    • All
  • Directory
  • Custom
    • Sponsored Content
    • Conair Sponsored Content
    • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
    • ENGEL Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
    • Classifieds
    • Place an Ad
    • Sign up for Early Classified
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Mailbag
August 13, 2015 02:00 AM

Bag fees and bans are not the answer

Kenneth W. Russell
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print

    I was surprised to read Steve Toloken's blog on July 21, “Why the plastics industry should be OK with limits on plastic bags.” The article defended outrageous fees for plastic grocery bags and even accepted that a ban on bags was a good thing.

    Toloken mentions a fee charged in China of approximately 8 cents per bag. The number I repeatedly hear is more like 15 cents per bag in the United States. This fee is outrageous in my opinion. Why? Because there is less than 1 cent worth of plastic resin and additives in a plastic grocery bag. Processing fees for each bag are essentially negligible. But even if they were to double the total cost to manufacture each bag, how can charging a punitive fee equal to 7 to 15 times the value of a legitimate, legal product that does what it is intended to do ever be justified?

    Of course the issue of single-use grocery bags is that they are destined for a one-way trip to the landfill. Unfortunately this is essentially true. Plastic grocery bags should bear the cost for their disposal. A quick Internet search shows the average disposal costs for a landfill is between $10 and $80 per ton. Simple math shows that this equates to less than one tenth of a cent per plastic bag. For this reason, assessing such a high per bag fee is unreasonable.

    I understand that the fee is intended to reduce the number of single-use plastic bags during a trip to the grocery store. I assert that this is misguided at best and simply does not work. I also do not believe that it is necessary to reiterate all of the benefits that plastic bags provide over paper or cloth in a plastics industry trade publication.

    We, members of the plastic industry, know the benefits that plastic bags provide and the data that is available that shows that plastic bags, even single-use bags are better for the environment than paper or cloth. However, the public's perception is the opposite. Bag fees and outright bans promote this perception even as the science proves otherwise.

    Bag fees and bag bans are politically expedient threats to our industry that use emotion rather than science to eliminate a significant sector of our industry and the jobs associated with that. What are the fees used for? Are they set aside in support of R&D to research new bag materials that are compostable and biodegradable? Is the money used to set up new practical methods of collection of bags for recycling? Or new recycling methods or material handling methods to make the recycling of lightweight films economical? No. Many would consider this to be corporate welfare. The money is simply absorbed into the general fund to be used like the rest of tax money for our bloated government, or the grocers become part of this scheme in that they get to keep the fees as revenue.

    So what do we do if we are responsible, environmentally conscious citizens of this planet? We need to encourage new material and compound development. A single-use plastic bag must have the following properties:

    • It must have sufficient tensile strength to carry the groceries loaded into it.

    • It must have sufficient puncture resistance to protect against sharp packages.

    • It must have sufficient tear resistance so that if it is punctured the bag doesn't just rip open dumping the contents all over the parking lot.

    • It must use the absolute minimum amount of material possible to achieve the above properties and continually be improved to use less material as possible.

    • It must be very low cost — if we want to replace polyethylene bags, the replacement must cost the same or less. Developing more costly materials under the guise that people should be willing to pay more to protect the environment is naive and is the same thinking that leads to bag fees.

    • And finally — once it has been used it must go away!

    Since the 1970s, items that no longer retained value were simply discarded. Litter, municipal trash, landfill, oceans, wherever — as long as it wasn't my problem anymore. Someone else can deal with it.

    Thankfully that is no longer an acceptable viewpoint (at least not in the West). Recycling is the best current answer. But recycle rates for plastic bags remain very low. New technology needs to be developed for simpler and more efficient collection, sorting and processing to make recycling of thin films economically attractive. Some companies are working on this.

    Compostable bags and biodegradable bags that are low cost, have high strength properties and do not contaminate the recycling streams should be pursued. The effects of new materials on the recycling stream must be considered. Energy reclamation through incineration is another technology that is often overlooked.

    The reality in the 21st century is that the vast majority of our society gets their goods from grocery stores. This is significantly different from the first half of the 20th century when carrying a tote was the answer. Grocery bags address the issue of getting stuff home from the market. Thin plastic bags do this more efficiently with minimal energy usage, minimal material usage and a smaller impact on the environment than the other options. Now we need to find a way to make a single-use bag be truly single-use in that it really goes away after its value has been consumed. Bag fees and bans are not the answer and our industry should be fighting these political reactions with data and solutions based on science.

    Kenneth W. Russell

    Optimized Compounds LLC

    RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
    Studies say plastics are a green choice
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Plastics News would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor at [email protected]

    Most Popular
    1
    Two plastic container companies cut jobs
    2
    Armstrong may lay off more than 600
    3
    Obituary: Joseph Prischak, Plastek founder, Hall of Famer
    4
    Financing for Novolex highlights the company's greenhouse gas reduction efforts
    5
    House Democrats try again on pellet legislation
    SIGN UP FOR TO RECEIVE THESE EMAILS AND ENEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Plastics News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe today

    Subscribe to Plastics News

    Subscribe now
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Plastics News covers the business of the global plastics industry. We report news, gather data and deliver timely information that provides our readers with a competitive advantage.

    Contact Us

    1155 Gratiot Avenue
    Detroit MI 48207-2997

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1723

    Resources
    • About
    • Staff
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Data Store
    • Digital Edition
    • Custom Content
    • People
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Sitemap
    Related Crain Publications
    • Sustainable Plastics
    • Rubber News
    • Urethanes Technology
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Tire Business
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Processor News
        • Injection Molding
        • Blow Molding
        • Film & Sheet
        • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
        • Rotomolding
        • Thermoforming
        • Recycling
      • Suppliers
        • Machinery
        • Materials
        • Molds/Tooling
        • Product news
        • Design
      • More News
        • Mergers & Acquisitions
        • Sustainability
        • Public Policy
        • Material Insights Videos
        • Numbers that Matter
      • Digital Edition
      • End Markets
        • Automotive
        • Packaging
        • Medical
        • Consumer Products
        • Construction
      • Special Reports
        • CEO Issue
        • Diversity
        • Best Places to Work
          • 2022 winners
        • Processor of the Year
        • Rising Stars
        • Women Breaking the Mold
      • Newsletters
      • Resin pricing news
      • Videos
    • Opinion
      • The Plastics Blog
      • Kickstart
      • One Good Resin
      • BRICS and Plastics
      • All Things Data
      • Viewpoint
      • From Pillar to Post
      • Perspective
      • Mailbag
      • Fake Plastic Trees
    • Shop Floor
      • Blending
      • Compounding
      • Drying
      • Injection Molding
      • Purging
      • Robotics
      • Size Reduction
      • Structural Foam
      • Tooling
      • Training
    • Events
      • Plastics News Events
        • Plastics News Executive Forum
        • Injection Molding & Design Expo
        • Plastics News Caps & Closures
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
        • Plastics in Automotive
      • Industry Events
        • Injection Molding & Design Expo
      • Injection Molding & Design Expo
      • Livestreams/Webinars
        • Reuters Responsible Business Europe 2022
        • Reifenhäuser Technologies Livestreams
      • Editorial Livestreams
        • Polymer Points Live
        • Numbers that Matter Live
        • Plastics in Politics Live
        • Sustainable Plastics Live
      • Ask the Expert
      • Plastics News Events Library
        • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
        • Plastics in Healthcare Library
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
      • Processor of the Year submissions
    • Resin Prices
      • All Resins
      • Commodity TPs
        • Historic Commodity Thermoplastics
      • High Temp TPs
        • Historic High Temp Thermoplastics
      • ETPs
        • Historic Engineering Thermoplastics
      • Thermosets
        • Historic Thermosets
      • Recycled Plastics
        • Historic Recycled Plastics
    • Rankings & Data
      • Injection Molders
      • Blow Molders
      • Film Sheet
      • Thermoformers
      • Pipe Profile Tubing
      • Rotomolders
      • Mold/Toolmakers
      • LSR Processors
      • Recyclers
      • Compounders - List
      • Association - List
      • Plastic Lumber - List
      • All
    • Directory
    • Custom
      • Sponsored Content
      • Conair Sponsored Content
      • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
      • ENGEL Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
      • Classifieds
        • Place an Ad
        • Sign up for Early Classified