Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Sustainable Plastics
  • Rubber News
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Processor News
    • Suppliers
    • More News
    • Digital Edition
    • End Markets
    • Special Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Injection Molding
    • Blow Molding
    • Film & Sheet
    • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
    • Rotomolding
    • Thermoforming
    • Recycling
    • Machinery
    • Materials
    • Molds/Tooling
    • Product news
    • Design
    • K Show
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Sustainability
    • Public Policy
    • Material Insights Videos
    • Numbers that Matter
    • Automotive
    • Packaging
    • Medical
    • Consumer Products
    • Construction
    • Notable Leaders in Sustainability
    • Processor of the Year
    • Best Places to Work
    • Women Breaking the Mold
    • Rising Stars
    • Diversity
    • Most Interesting Social Media Accounts in Plastics
  • Opinion
    • The Plastics Blog
    • Kickstart
    • One Good Resin
    • Pellets and Politics
    • All Things Data
    • Viewpoint
    • From Pillar to Post
    • Perspective
    • Mailbag
    • Fake Plastic Trees
  • Shop Floor
    • Blending
    • Compounding
    • Drying
    • Injection Molding
    • Purging
    • Robotics
    • Size Reduction
    • Structural Foam
    • Tooling
    • Training
  • Events
    • Plastics News Events
    • Industry Events
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Livestreams/Webinars
    • Editorial Livestreams
    • Ask the Expert
    • Plastics News Events Library
    • Plastics News Executive Forum
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Plastics Caps + Closures: A Global Online Event
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
    • Bioplastics Live
    • Numbers that Matter Live
    • PFAS Live
    • Plastics in Politics Live
    • PN Live: Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Polymer Points Live
    • Sustainable Plastics Live
    • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
    • Plastics in Healthcare Library
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
  • Rankings & Data
    • Injection Molders
    • Blow Molders
    • Film Sheet
    • Thermoformers
    • Pipe Profile Tubing
    • Rotomolders
    • Mold/Toolmakers
    • LSR Processors
    • Recyclers
    • Compounders - List
    • Association - List
    • Plastic Lumber - List
    • All
  • Directory
  • Resin Prices
    • Resin Prices Overview
    • Commodity Thermoplastics
    • High Temperature Thermoplastics
    • Engineering Thermoplastics
    • Recycled Plastics
    • Thermosets
    • Europe - Virgin
    • Europe - Recycled
    • Europe - Feedstock
  • Custom
    • Sponsored Content
    • LS Mtron Sponsored Content
    • Conair Sponsored Content
    • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
    • ENGEL Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
    • Classifieds
    • Place an Ad
    • Sign up for Early Classified
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
November 10, 2015 01:00 AM

Upcoming vote puts single-use plastic bags in the crosshairs

Gayle S. Putrich
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Rich Williams

    Sacramento, Calif. — The countdown is on.

    In just a little less than one year, on Nov. 8, 2016, California voters will decide on what could be the first statewide ban of plastic bags in the United States. The vote is considered by many to be about far more than the environment and — by those inside and outside the plastics industry — a referendum not just on plastic bags but on plastic as a material.

    After nearly a decade of trying, California came within a whisker of having the first statewide ban on plastic bags. When Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed SB 270 into law on Sept. 30, 2014, it seemed like the successful culmination of years of effort on the part of environmental lobbyists.

    But plastics industry lawyers, backed by the American Progressive Bag Alliance (APBA), were immediately ready with a letter requesting a veto referendum.

    California's state constitution provides that if enough voters sign petitions they can halt a newly enacted law, and then that law has to appear before voters on the next general election ballot. If voters approve it, the law it goes into effect. If they reject it, the law is repealed.

    Ninety days and more than 800,000 signatures later — even though only 504,760 were required — the ban was on hold and APBA's initiative was headed for the voters. It was officially placed on the November 2016 ballot on Feb. 24.

    “SB 270 was never a bill about the environment. It was a backroom deal between the California Grocers Association and their union friends to scam consumers out of billions of dollars in bag fees — all under the guise of environmentalism,” Lee Califf, APBA's executive director, said at the time. APBA is a coalition of plastics companies including Hilex Poly Co. LLC and its parent Novolex, Dow Chemical Co., Superbag Corp., Advanced Polybag Inc. and others; APBA is part of the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc.

    The nuts and bolts

    Data by Gayle S. Putrich, graphics by Amelia Eramya

    The California Plastic Bag Ban Referendum is on the Nov. 8, 2016, ballot as a veto referendum, meaning “yes” vote would uphold and ratify the contested legislation (SB 270), while a “no” vote overturns it and keeps the bags legal statewide — except for in communities where there is a local law ban.

    And in many places in California — 129 municipalities and counties, so far — there is a local law. And should SB 270 survive next November's vote, it would not supersede local laws passed before September 2014.

    If ratified by voters in 2016, the law also would:

    • Prohibit chain grocery stores and pharmacies from providing single-use plastic bags and add small grocery stories, liquor stores, convenience stores and mini-marts to the prohibition one year later.

    • Impose fines of $1,000 per day for the first violation, $2,000 per day for the second and $5,000 per day for the third and subsequent violations of the ban.

    • Mandate a 10-cent minimum charge for paper bags, to be paid to the store and require the paper bags are made with 40 percent post-consumer recycled content.

    • Exempt from the bag fee any customer using state payment cards or vouchers, such as those who receive benefits from the California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

    • Allow thin-film bags or free small paper bags for prescription medication, dry cleaning bags and any bag “to contain an unwrapped food item,” such as bread, meat, produce or bulk foods.

    • Provide $2 million in loans from the state to California-based plastic bag manufacturers to help retain jobs and transition to making thicker, multi-use, recycled-content plastic bags.

    The law also would put stringent definitions on what bags are not acceptable in California. “Reusable” plastic bags would be defined as those rated for 125 uses and made of at least 20 percent recycled plastic at first, ultimately going up to 40 percent recycled content and be “capable of carrying 22 pounds over a distance of 175 feet for a minimum of 125 uses and be at least 2.25 mils thick.”

    Reusable fabric bags also would need to be rated for 125 uses, have handles and a tag providing extensive information on where the bag was made and what it was made of as well as be machine washable or otherwise able to be disinfected.

    Paper bags would have to be made of a minimum of 40 percent post-consumer recycled materials. 

    Legislative deal

    For nearly a decade, coastal California environmentalists pressed legislators for a statewide ban on plastic bags. But even with liberal majorities in the state legislature, and the heft of environmental groups including Californians Against Waste (CAW), the Surfrider Foundation, Save the Bay and 5Gyres, it could not pass both chambers without other key supporters: grocery stores and their workers.

    In fact, while the California State Senate passed the bill by a 22-15 vote on Aug. 29, 2014, the last day of the legislative session, an initial vote in the Assembly failed. But three days later, legislators, particularly then-Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacioma), the bill's author who now serves as California's Secretary of State and Sen. Kevin deLeon (D-Los Angeles), struck a deal that locked down the support of the California Grocers Association (CGA), which previously had been a key opponent of the bag ban, and the labor group representing grocery store workers, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW).

    Now backed by CGA, the amended bill — which would funnel the 10-cent-per-bag minimum fee to the grocers rather than environmental groups or state litter and recycling programs — was approved and signed by Brown.

    Estimates range from $700,000 to more than $1 billion in expected revenue to be generated from the 10-cent minimum fee retailers would be required to charge under the new law. Califf and APBA members say the fee will easily generate $400 million per year for grocers.

    It's the potential fate of those funds that is adding yet another wrinkle to the bag ban fight, even this late in the referendum game.

    Battle over fees

    On Oct. 2, APBA filed a second ballot measure with the California Attorney General's office related to the fees. Califf and APBA members say a majority of Californians think that money should be serving the environment.

    Tentatively called the Environmental Fee Protection Act, the ballot measure would send bag fee funds to the California Wildlife Conservation Board, which would distribute the money as environmental grants. APBA says the money could go to worthy goals, such as remediating drought-stricken forests, restoring wetlands and paying for recycling, litter removal and habitat restoration.

    Bag ban supporters, including Californians Against Waste, are crying foul, equating the Environmental Fee Protection Act with flip-flopping on bag bans. CAW maintains that the grocers' support of SB 270 came about not because of the money they stand to gain, but as a sensible way to avoid a patchwork of 130 separate local bag ordinances across the state.

    And even more anti-bag groups, including one named California vs. Big Plastic, have formed to fight both ballot measures.

    APBA believes it will have no problem getting enough signatures to put the second proposed referendum on the ballot.

    Pointing to a private poll, Califf said in an email to Plastics News last month: “We are confident in our ability to gather signatures, especially given that 84 percent of California voters believe that bag fees in general should go to a public purpose instead of increasing profit margins for grocers.”

    Read other stories in this series:

    Analyst: Industry must spend big to win

    Bag ban fight slogs on

    Huntington Beach becomes first to toss bag ban

    RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
    Auto suppliers plan for uncertainty amid UAW strike, shift to EVs
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Plastics News would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor at [email protected]

    Most Popular
    1
    An 8,000-ton dream for Milacron, 20/20 Custom Molded Plastics
    2
    Proposed tax on single-use virgin plastic resurfaces in Congress
    3
    Is the market getting serious about using recycled plastics?
    4
    Feedstock costs continue pushing up PET bottle resin prices
    5
    Reduced supply, rising oil costs lead to boost in recycled PET resin prices
    SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Find more newsletters at plasticsnews.com/newsletters.

    You can unsubscribe at any time through links in these emails. For more information, see our Privacy Policy.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Plastics News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe today

    Subscribe to Plastics News

    Subscribe now
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Plastics News covers the business of the global plastics industry. We report news, gather data and deliver timely information that provides our readers with a competitive advantage.

    Contact Us

    1155 Gratiot Avenue
    Detroit MI 48207-2997

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1723

    Resources
    • About
    • Staff
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Data Store
    • Digital Edition
    • Custom Content
    • People
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Sitemap
    Related Crain Publications
    • Sustainable Plastics
    • Rubber News
    • Tire Business
    • Urethanes Technology
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Processor News
        • Injection Molding
        • Blow Molding
        • Film & Sheet
        • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
        • Rotomolding
        • Thermoforming
        • Recycling
      • Suppliers
        • Machinery
        • Materials
        • Molds/Tooling
        • Product news
        • Design
      • More News
        • K Show
        • Mergers & Acquisitions
        • Sustainability
        • Public Policy
        • Material Insights Videos
        • Numbers that Matter
      • Digital Edition
      • End Markets
        • Automotive
        • Packaging
        • Medical
        • Consumer Products
        • Construction
      • Special Reports
        • Notable Leaders in Sustainability
        • Processor of the Year
        • Best Places to Work
        • Women Breaking the Mold
        • Rising Stars
        • Diversity
        • Most Interesting Social Media Accounts in Plastics
      • Newsletters
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
    • Opinion
      • The Plastics Blog
      • Kickstart
      • One Good Resin
      • Pellets and Politics
      • All Things Data
      • Viewpoint
      • From Pillar to Post
      • Perspective
      • Mailbag
      • Fake Plastic Trees
    • Shop Floor
      • Blending
      • Compounding
      • Drying
      • Injection Molding
      • Purging
      • Robotics
      • Size Reduction
      • Structural Foam
      • Tooling
      • Training
    • Events
      • Plastics News Events
        • Plastics News Executive Forum
        • Injection Molding & Design Expo
        • Plastics Caps + Closures: A Global Online Event
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
      • Industry Events
      • Injection Molding & Design Expo
      • Livestreams/Webinars
      • Editorial Livestreams
        • Bioplastics Live
        • Numbers that Matter Live
        • PFAS Live
        • Plastics in Politics Live
        • PN Live: Mergers and Acquisitions
        • Polymer Points Live
        • Sustainable Plastics Live
      • Ask the Expert
      • Plastics News Events Library
        • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
        • Plastics in Healthcare Library
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
    • Rankings & Data
      • Injection Molders
      • Blow Molders
      • Film Sheet
      • Thermoformers
      • Pipe Profile Tubing
      • Rotomolders
      • Mold/Toolmakers
      • LSR Processors
      • Recyclers
      • Compounders - List
      • Association - List
      • Plastic Lumber - List
      • All
    • Directory
    • Resin Prices
      • Resin Prices Overview
      • Commodity Thermoplastics
      • High Temperature Thermoplastics
      • Engineering Thermoplastics
      • Recycled Plastics
      • Thermosets
      • Europe - Virgin
      • Europe - Recycled
      • Europe - Feedstock
    • Custom
      • Sponsored Content
      • LS Mtron Sponsored Content
      • Conair Sponsored Content
      • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
      • ENGEL Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
      • Classifieds
        • Place an Ad
        • Sign up for Early Classified