Researcher calls for ban on plastics glitter

A New Zealand scientist wants plastics glitter banned to protect marine species.

Trisia Farrelly, an environmental anthropologist at Massey University in Palmerston, said there are alternatives to the PET-based glitter.

Her research is based on the findings of toxicologists and endocrinologists.

"There is a growing body of evidence to suggest toxins released by microplastics and additional pollutants absorbed by plastics in aquatic environments — what some marine scientists refer to as 'poison pills' — can bioaccumulate up the food chain with the potential to disrupt the endocrine systems of sea life, and [humans] when we consume seafood," Farrelly said.

She acknowledged glitter is a "relatively tiny part of the broader problem of global microplastics" but wants to "raise awareness about environmentally responsible production and consumption and problems associated with microplastics."

"If plastic-based glitter is the vehicle for opening more conversations, I welcome that," she said.

Farrelly also wants greater cooperation across the scientific community.

"Damage from microplastics is a serious and extremely complex global issue requiring a radical interdisciplinary approach with natural and social scientists working together to raise awareness with policymakers, health professionals and the public."

She says there are plenty of environmentally friendly glitter alternatives available, but the onus is on producer responsibility.

"Why should producers get away with making a profit out of production of single-use disposal plastics, like plastic-based glitter, while bearing little to no responsibility for the environmental damage they cause?"