Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • Sustainable Plastics
  • Rubber News
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Processor News
    • Suppliers
    • More News
    • Digital Edition
    • End Markets
    • Special Reports
    • Newsletters
    • Resin pricing news
    • Videos
    • Injection Molding
    • Blow Molding
    • Film & Sheet
    • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
    • Rotomolding
    • Thermoforming
    • Recycling
    • Machinery
    • Materials
    • Molds/Tooling
    • Product news
    • Design
    • K Show
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Sustainability
    • Public Policy
    • Material Insights Videos
    • Numbers that Matter
    • Automotive
    • Packaging
    • Medical
    • Consumer Products
    • Construction
    • Processor of the Year
    • Best Places to Work
    • Women Breaking the Mold
    • Rising Stars
    • Diversity
    • Most Interesting Social Media Accounts in Plastics
  • Opinion
    • The Plastics Blog
    • Kickstart
    • One Good Resin
    • Pellets and Politics
    • All Things Data
    • Viewpoint
    • From Pillar to Post
    • Perspective
    • Mailbag
    • Fake Plastic Trees
  • Shop Floor
    • Blending
    • Compounding
    • Drying
    • Injection Molding
    • Purging
    • Robotics
    • Size Reduction
    • Structural Foam
    • Tooling
    • Training
  • Events
    • K Show Livestream
    • Plastics News Events
    • Industry Events
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Livestreams/Webinars
    • Editorial Livestreams
    • Ask the Expert
    • Plastics News Events Library
    • Processor of the Year submissions
    • Plastics News Executive Forum
    • Injection Molding & Design Expo
    • Plastics News Caps & Closures
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
    • Plastics in Automotive
    • PN Live: Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Polymer Points Live
    • Numbers that Matter Live
    • Plastics in Politics Live
    • Sustainable Plastics Live
    • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
    • Plastics in Healthcare Library
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
  • Rankings & Data
    • Injection Molders
    • Blow Molders
    • Film Sheet
    • Thermoformers
    • Pipe Profile Tubing
    • Rotomolders
    • Mold/Toolmakers
    • LSR Processors
    • Recyclers
    • Compounders - List
    • Association - List
    • Plastic Lumber - List
    • All
  • Directory
  • Resin Prices
    • Commodity TPs
    • High Temp TPs
    • ETPs
    • Thermosets
    • Recycled Plastics
    • Historic Commodity Thermoplastics
    • Historic High Temp Thermoplastics
    • Historic Engineering Thermoplastics
    • Historic Thermosets
    • Historic Recycled Plastics
  • Custom
    • Sponsored Content
    • LS Mtron Sponsored Content
    • Conair Sponsored Content
    • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
    • ENGEL Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
    • Classifieds
    • Place an Ad
    • Sign up for Early Classified
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
August 27, 2021 12:06 PM

California eyes limits to recyclability marketing that could hit PP, thermoformed packaging

Steve Toloken
Assistant Managing Editor
Plastics News Staff
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Steve Toloken
    Items such as coffee pods may be impacted by rules under consideration in California to limit recyclability claims.

    With surveys showing the public thoroughly confused about what can and can't be recycled, California lawmakers aim to get much tougher around recyclability marketing claims for plastic packaging.

    A bill that would sharply limit those claims, including when the chasing arrows symbol can be put on packaging, has passed the state Senate by a wide margin and is making its way through the Assembly, where it faces a Sept. 10 deadline to pass.

    The group Californians Against Waste called it the "country's strongest protections against deceptive recyclability claims," and supporters said it would build up markets by creating cleaner recycling streams.

    "This bill gets at misleading recycling symbols placed on products that don't actually indicate real recyclability," said state Sen. Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica, the lead author.

    Allen opened one recent hearing on the legislation by pointing to confusing chasing arrows messaging on plastic newspaper bags, which can contaminate recycling streams if they're mistakenly put in curbside bins.

    But Allen's proposal is drawing opposition from plastics groups, who say they recognize public confusion but also fear one provision will unintentionally hurt their plans to build up viable recycling streams for PET thermoforms and polypropylene packaging.

    As well, another part of the bill that would directly impact plastics companies would limit the use of the chasing arrows symbol in the resin identification code on bottles and containers.

    The legislation, called Senate Bill 343, is attracting significant attention.

    Environmental groups have mounted phone banking, canvassing and social media campaigns to build support, and the Plastics Industry Association said Aug. 26 that its top state government specialist was in California for a week working on the bill.

    "We anticipate a number of amendments in committee and on the floor, so the legislation is likely far from a finished product," said Shannon Crawford, director of state government affairs at the association, in a statement.

    Nick Lapis, the director of advocacy at CAW, said there are talks about making reporting requirements for companies simpler, which he called a "reasonable compromise."

    It passed the state Senate on a 31-6 vote in June.

     

    Screenshot by Steve Toloken
    California environmental groups have been seeking public suport for a tough new plastics recyclability labeling law.
    Leaving out PP, thermoforms

    Beyond reforming use of chasing arrows, the legislation starts a regulatory process that could lead to some major plastic packaging materials, like polypropylene, unable to be labeled as recyclable in the state.

    It directs the state agency CalRecycle to create a list, by Jan. 1, 2023, of what can and can't be labeled recyclable.

    It's that provision that's drawing particular concern from business groups like the plastics association and the packaging group Ameripen.

    They worry that CalRecycle will decide that only PET and high density polyethylene bottles have strong enough markets to carry recycling labels, leaving out PP packaging and thermoforms.

    "SB-343 … will limit strong and viable recycling markets in the state, specifically of PET thermoforms and polypropylene," Crawford said in July testimony to the state Legislature.

    She and other industry lobbyists say they believe CalRecycle would follow the lead of the California Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling, a study group created by the state Legislature in 2019.

    In its first formal report, delivered in June, that group echoed SB-343's calls for stricter labeling. And importantly, it recommended that within plastics, only PET and HDPE bottles be marketed as recyclable and use chasing arrows symbols.

    Crawford said the plastics association is "very concerned" Allen's legislation adopts some of the commission's criteria and would result in CalRecycle declaring "only PET and HDPE bottles as recyclables."

    "PET thermoforms or clamshells, which carry so much of California's fresh produce, would not be considered recyclable, and neither would polypropylene, which has material qualities making it the preferred resin for a variety of food," Crawford said.

    It would have the "unintended" impact, she said, of "less recycling and more materials going to landfills."

    Industry groups have been working on programs to boost PP and PET thermoform clamshell recycling.

    The Recycling Partnership, for example, announced Aug. 24 that an industry-funded effort on PP had spent $4.2 million in the last year to improve PP curbside recycling access for 15 million Americans.

    "Real solutions can only be achieved by an emphasis on developing end markets," Crawford said.

    But advocates for Allen's plan pushed back on some of the industry points, with one lawmaker responding to arguments it would unintentionally send more materials to landfills.

    "There was a comment about this bill leading to more stuff being landfilled," said Assembly Member Cristina Garcia, D-Downey. "The reality is that most of this stuff is already being landfilled or burned or being shipped out where we're pretending to recycle it.

    "That's a false narrative we need to get beyond," she said.

    Recycling rates for PP and PET thermoforms are low. EPA figures say about 3 percent of PP packaging in the U.S. is recycled.

    And an industry report this year estimated that about 9 percent of PET thermoforms get recycled nationwide.

    Allen pointed to a recent survey of California cities that found 70 percent of them planned to raise waste collection rates as much as 20 percent, and he said California recycles just 15 percent of its plastic packaging.

    "Our constituents are already paying money to Band-Aid over our broken system," he said.

    Shifting to PET, HDPE

    Allen told his fellow lawmakers that he hopes the bill's "truth in labeling approach" helps shift packaging to more recyclable polymers like PET and HDPE, plastics 1 and 2 in the resin ID code.

    "We should be doing everything we can, to the extent possible, to encourage producers who are in the plastics space to produce their products using the 1s and 2s, which are highly recyclable" Allen said.

    "At the end of the day, most of the items with a 3-7 number ... most of them are technically recyclable under perfect conditions, but for a variety of reasons, they are just not being recycled," Allen said.

    He said the legislation includes flexibility if a company using a less recycled plastic material can point to markets developing.

    "There is flexibility that we offer [in the bill], but we just want to make sure that the items are really being recycled," Allen said.

    But some lawmakers expressed skepticism about Allen's proposal, arguing it would raise costs if companies had to do California-specific packaging to meet any new labeling or recycling restrictions.

    "If we're going to separate ourselves from everyone else, there's a cost to doing that," said Assembly Member Kelly Seyarto, R-Murrieta. "That cost is added on to the cost of living here, which is already higher than a lot of different places."

    Lauren Aguilar, a lobbyist with Ameripen, echoed concerns that SB-343 would cause CalRecycle to do what the state commission did and only allow a small number of plastics to carry recyclability marketing labels.

    "We expect CalRecycle to reach a similar and extremely limiting list," she said.

    The commission said only eight paper products — two glass, two metals and PET and natural and colored HDPE bottles — should carry recyclability labels.

    The head of that state commission told lawmakers that it's important to pass SB-343 because consumers are frustrated by confusing labeling and California has a chance to lead a national debate.

    "California must not be held back by other states that allow confusing and misleading labeling," said Heidi Sanborn, who chairs the recycling commission and is executive director of the National Stewardship Action Council. "We hope to set the standard for the nation."

     

    Updating resin ID codes

    In a more technical provision that directly impacts plastic firms, the bill would also prohibit using the chasing arrows as part of the resin identification code for plastic packaging, unless that packaging type is certified as recyclable by CalRecycle.

    On that point, the plastics association and California state officials seem to be in general agreement.

    But one challenge, they say, will be changing state laws across the country that currently require chasing arrows in the resin ID code on plastics.

    "This legislation has started an important conversation on the resin identification code, or RIC," PIA's Crawford said. "Unfortunately, 30 states still require that those codes be placed inside three chasing arrows, creating significant confusion."

    In 2013, an industry technical committee recommended replacing the chasing arrows with a triangle, but state laws were not changed to reflect that.

    Crawford said the plastics association would work to change those laws.

    "We sincerely appreciate the authors' amendment, which allows our industry additional time to work with these other states and our members additional time to comply by updating our molds," she said.

    RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
    Illinois AG sues 14 firms over PFAS contamination
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Plastics News would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor at [email protected]

    Most Popular
    1
    Berry CEO Salmon retiring
    2
    Slowing demand for thermoformed PET leads to Genpak plant closure
    3
    Prices on the rise for PP, PVC
    4
    SK Battery America invests $19M in Georgia IT center
    5
    Singing the praises of family ownership
    SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Plastics News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe today

    Subscribe to Plastics News

    Subscribe now
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Plastics News covers the business of the global plastics industry. We report news, gather data and deliver timely information that provides our readers with a competitive advantage.

    Contact Us

    1155 Gratiot Avenue
    Detroit MI 48207-2997

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1723

    Resources
    • About
    • Staff
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Data Store
    • Digital Edition
    • Custom Content
    • People
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Sitemap
    Related Crain Publications
    • Sustainable Plastics
    • Rubber News
    • Tire Business
    • Urethanes Technology
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Processor News
        • Injection Molding
        • Blow Molding
        • Film & Sheet
        • Pipe/Profile/Tubing
        • Rotomolding
        • Thermoforming
        • Recycling
      • Suppliers
        • Machinery
        • Materials
        • Molds/Tooling
        • Product news
        • Design
      • More News
        • K Show
        • Mergers & Acquisitions
        • Sustainability
        • Public Policy
        • Material Insights Videos
        • Numbers that Matter
      • Digital Edition
      • End Markets
        • Automotive
        • Packaging
        • Medical
        • Consumer Products
        • Construction
      • Special Reports
        • Processor of the Year
        • Best Places to Work
        • Women Breaking the Mold
        • Rising Stars
        • Diversity
        • Most Interesting Social Media Accounts in Plastics
      • Newsletters
      • Resin pricing news
      • Videos
    • Opinion
      • The Plastics Blog
      • Kickstart
      • One Good Resin
      • Pellets and Politics
      • All Things Data
      • Viewpoint
      • From Pillar to Post
      • Perspective
      • Mailbag
      • Fake Plastic Trees
    • Shop Floor
      • Blending
      • Compounding
      • Drying
      • Injection Molding
      • Purging
      • Robotics
      • Size Reduction
      • Structural Foam
      • Tooling
      • Training
    • Events
      • K Show Livestream
      • Plastics News Events
        • Plastics News Executive Forum
        • Injection Molding & Design Expo
        • Plastics News Caps & Closures
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
        • Plastics in Automotive
      • Industry Events
      • Injection Molding & Design Expo
      • Livestreams/Webinars
        • PN Live: Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Editorial Livestreams
        • Polymer Points Live
        • Numbers that Matter Live
        • Plastics in Politics Live
        • Sustainable Plastics Live
      • Ask the Expert
      • Plastics News Events Library
        • Plastics Caps & Closures Library
        • Plastics in Healthcare Library
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum Library
      • Processor of the Year submissions
    • Rankings & Data
      • Injection Molders
      • Blow Molders
      • Film Sheet
      • Thermoformers
      • Pipe Profile Tubing
      • Rotomolders
      • Mold/Toolmakers
      • LSR Processors
      • Recyclers
      • Compounders - List
      • Association - List
      • Plastic Lumber - List
      • All
    • Directory
    • Resin Prices
      • Commodity TPs
        • Historic Commodity Thermoplastics
      • High Temp TPs
        • Historic High Temp Thermoplastics
      • ETPs
        • Historic Engineering Thermoplastics
      • Thermosets
        • Historic Thermosets
      • Recycled Plastics
        • Historic Recycled Plastics
    • Custom
      • Sponsored Content
      • LS Mtron Sponsored Content
      • Conair Sponsored Content
      • KraussMaffei Sponsored Content
      • ENGEL Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
      • Classifieds
        • Place an Ad
        • Sign up for Early Classified