The United Nations plastics treaty talks are ending in just a few months, and I get the feeling that a lot of industry people still don't really understand why that's important.
Maybe it's wishful thinking: a belief that the delegates will suddenly realize that there's no need to solve plastics pollution issues and the status quo is working just fine. I'm here to tell you, that's not going to happen.
There will be an agreement, and it will certainly have a big long-term impact on the global plastics industry, especially on resin production, single-use plastics makers and recyclers.
How much of an impact and how soon? Those are big questions. Taxes or caps on virgin production are possible.
In a recent Plastics in Politics livestream, a viewer asked about Plastics News' position on this topic. Our editorial position is in opposition to bans and taxes that encourage replacing plastic products with less sustainable alternative materials.
We also support extended producer responsibility when it has a positive role in making plastics a more sustainable part of the circular economy. That includes, for example, state and national bottle bills, since deposit programs have proved effective in collecting a clean, valuable recycling stream.
EPR will likely be part of a U.N. agreement, but it's expected to go far beyond just dealing with policies that make plastics more circular. Steve Toloken has quoted delegates saying that an ambitious treaty could kick off a 20-year-plus global debate on plastic pollution and chemical health.